(5)
where '
j
i
/
s
i
/
j
i
//
s
i
//
_ _
j
q
/
T
/
j
//
q
T
//
_ _
(6)
where A
X
is the exergy dissipation velocity and T
o
is the
temperature of the innite reservoir. Dimensionally j
i
/
and j
q
/
are expressed in mol/s or kg/s and in W, respec-
tively. Eq.(6) is particularized to two opposed elemen-
tary processes which are permanently encountered in the
heat absorption technology: (i) the gas interacts with the
liquid, resulting in a liquid with new properties
(absorption); (ii) the liquid decomposes in liquid and gas
with new properties (generation). Taking the above into
account as well as the common conventional signs in
thermodynamics, Eq. (6) can be rewritten for case (i) as
S
X
= j
iYg
/
s
g
/
j
iYl
/
s
l
/
j
iYl
//
s
l
//
_ _
j
qYg
/
1
T
/
g
j
qYl
/
1
T
l
/
j
qYl
//
j
q
_ _
1
T
l
//
_ _
(7)
where j
q
is a heat current, considered as an excess ele-
ment resulting from the deviation from the ideal state of
the mixture. The following currents balances are con-
sidered in the system
process heat
j
qYg
/
j
qYl
/
= j
qYl
//
j
q
(8)
total mass
j
iYg
/
j
iYl
/
= j
iYl
//
(9)
156 M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167
mass for one of the species
yj
iYg
/
xj
iYl
/
= x x ( )j
iYl
//
(10)
In Eq. (10) x is the nite variation of molar fraction,
suered by the liquid as a result of its interaction with
the gas phase. The heat ows are extensive elements.
Taking into account the previous observation concern-
ing the calculation of the heat exchange by means of
total enthalpy, they can be written as
j
qYg
/
= j
iYg
/
h
/
g
j
qYl
/
= j
iYl
/
h
/
l
j
qYl
//
= j
iYl
//
h
//
l
(11)
Taking into consideration Eqs (9) and (10), the rst
bracket of Eq. (7) can be written as
j
iYg
s
/
g
j
iYl
/
s
/
l
j
iYl
//
s
//
l
_ _
=
j
iYg
/
s
/
g
s
/
l
_ _
y x ( )
s
//
l
s
/
l
x
_ _
(12)
It is noted that the rst bracket of Eq. (7) represents the
contribution of mass currents to the entropy source
only, therefore the ratio in the right side of Eq. (12)
becomes
s
//
l
s
/
l
x
ds
l
dx
_ _
pYT
(13)
Temperature T
l
//
is related to the nite variation of
liquid temperature due to the deviation from the ideal
state T = T
l
//
T
l
/
by
1
T
l
//
=
1
T
l
1
T
T
l
/
_ _ =
1
T
l
/
1
T
T
l
/
T
T
l
/
_ _
2
. . .
_ _
(14)
Following simple calculations by means of Eqs. (14) and
(8)(11) the second bracket of Eq.(7) may be written as
j
qYg
/
1
T
g
/
j
qYl
//
1
T
l
/
j
qYl
//
j
q
_ _
1
T
l
//
_ _
=
j
iYg
/
1
T
g
/
1
T
l
/
_ _
h
/
g
1
T
l
/
h
/
g
h
/
l
h
/
l
j
r
_ _
T
T
l
/
1
T
T
l
/
_ _
_
_
_
_
(15)
where
j
r
=
j
iYg
/
j
iYl
//
(16)
is the reduced mass current of gas (mol mol
1
), involved
in the interaction. The ratio
T
T
l
/
is calculated by means of
the liquid specic heat equation at constant pressure
c
pYl
=
dh
l
dT
_ _
pYx
(17)
resulting in
T
T
l
/
=
h
/
l
T
l
/
c
pYl
= Aj
r
(18)
where the non-dimensional factor A in Eq. (18), herein
called ``reduced excess heat'' is obtained with Eqs. (9),
(10) and (16) and has the expression
A = y x ( )
dh
/
l
dx
_ _
pYT
1
T
l
/
c
pYl
(19)
Eqs. (12)(19) are introduced in Eq. (7) and the entropy
source is written as
S
X
= j
iYg
/
X ( ) (20)
where
X =
_
s
/
g
s
/
l
_ _
y x ( )
ds
/
l
dx
_ _
pYT
_ _
h
/
g
1
T
g
/
1
T
l
/
_ _
A
T
l
/
1 Aj
r
( )
h
/
g
h
/
l
_ _
j
r
h
/
l
_ _
_
(21)
Eq. (20), written as above, points out the proportion-
ality of the entropy source with the coupling gas mass
current j
iYg
/
and with factor X ( ), which is the thermo-
dynamic (generalized) force of the irreversible process at
hand [22,23]. The force diers of forces governing the
coupled heat and mass transfer in continuous media and
originating from Fourier's and Fick's laws, respectively.
It only depends on the entry values of the system, for
which reason the marking primary (
/
) is hereinafter
given up to. Because it depends only of the interface p,
T, x and y state parameters, force is a way independent
function, therefore a state function. According to Eqs.
(8)(11) the coupled heat current j
q
has the expression
j
q
= j
iYg
/
C (22)
M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167 157
where C is the local thermal capacity (availability) of the
binary mixture [24]
C = h
/
g
h
/
l
_ _
y x ( )
dh
/
l
dx
_ _
pYT
(23)
This paper is conned to considering that the currents
involved are linear functions of the thermodynamic for-
ces. Later on, this consideration will be justied. Hence,
the phenomenological equations are reduced to the
simplest linear expression
j
iYg
/
= L
11
X ( ) (24)
where L
11
is the strictly positive phenomenological
coecient of proportionality, having the dimension of
mol
2
KJ
1
s
1
. In a rst approximation L
11
is con-
sidered to be constant, independent of X. With Eq. (24),
the entropy source, [Eq. (20)], acquires the denite
positive form
S
X
= L
11
X
2
(25)
for all interface p, T, x and y values, except the ideal
points, given by
p
l
= p
g
= p
e
T
l
= T
g
= T
e
"
1 2 ( )Yl
= "
1 2 ( )Yg
where, according to current opinion it vanishes [23].
Later, the paper will refute this last statement. It is use-
ful to further proceed to non-dimensioning the equa-
tions referred to above. In order to do this, the
following reduced elements are considered
L
11Yr
=
L
11
j
iYl
//
R
_ _; X
r
=
X
R
; S
X
r
=
S
X
Rj
iYl
//
h
r
=
h
T
b
R
; c
pYr
= c
p
aR; s
r
= saR
p
r
=
p
p
b
; T
r
=
T
T
b
(26)
In Eq. (26) R, p
b
and T
b
are the gas constant, a reduc-
tion pressure and, respectively, an absolute reduction
temperature. In view of the above, the previously
deduced equations can be re-written in a reduced form
(index ``r'') as follows
S
X
r
= j
r
X ( ) = L
11Yr
X
2
r
(27)
j
r
= L
11Yr
X
r
( ) (28)
X
r
= s
gYr
s
lYr
_ _
y x ( )
ds
lYr
dx
_ _
p
r
T
r
_ _
h
gYr
1
T
gYr
1
T
lYr
_ _
A
r
T
lYr
1 A
r
j
r
( )
h
gYr
h
lYr
_ _
j
r
h
lYr
_ _
(29)
A
r
=
dh
lYr
dx
_ _
p
r
T
r
y x
T
lYr
c
pYlYr
(30)
j
qYr
= j
r
C
r
(31)
where
C
r
= h
gYr
h
lYr
_ _
y x ( )
dh
lYr
dx
_ _
p
r
T
r
(32)
The partial reduced thermodynamic force of a purely
mass nature, given by the rst square bracket of the
right side of Eq. (29) is marked as X
iYr
X
iYr
= s
gYr
s
lYr
_ _
y x ( )
ds
lYr
dx
_ _
p
r
T
r
(33)
We have to remark here the similitude of Eqs. (32) and
(33).
Bearing in mind that L
11Yr
must be in a rst approx-
imation independent of X
r
, from Eqs. (28) and (29) the
reduced thermodynamic force is expressed in an implicit
form as [20,25,26]
X
r
=
X
iYr
h
gYr
1
T
gYr
1
T
lYr
_ _
A
r
h
lYr
T
lYr
1 A
r
L
11Yr
X
r
( )
_ _
1
A
r
h
gYr
h
lYr
_ _
T
lYr
1 A
r
L
11Yr
X
r
( )
_ _ M p
rYe
Y x
e
_ _
(34)
where M p
rYe
Y x
e
( ) is a new function discussed later in
Section 3. It may be derived rather solving Eq. (34) with
respect to X
r
( ) by means of a simple iterative method
[27] (which the author preferred), but also as a second
degree algebraic equation [26]. Force is useful in
approaching interaction mass and heat currents of
mono-, bi- and particular poly-component gasliquid
interactions with non-ideal mixture, coupling it with
Eqs. (28) and (31) and the classic hydro-gasodynamics.
For instance, the two last types of interactions are
encountered in the binary systems NH
3
/H
2
O, H
2
O/
LiBr, NH
3
/LiNO
3
, NH
3
/NaSCN. CH
3
NH
2
/H
2
O etc.,
or in the ternary systems such as NH
3
/H
2
O-LiBr,
CH
3
NH
2
/H
2
O-LiBr etc. The resulting Phenomen-
ological Hydro-GasoDynamical (PhHGD) method was
already successfully used to model a few ammonia/
water absorption/generation applications [20,25,28,29].
158 M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167
The thermodynamic force enjoys several important
properties [26]. First, as already mentioned, force
applies also to interactions of solidliquid, solidgas or
gasgas, liquidliquid type, provided that appropriate
indexes in Eq. (34) be used (e.g. for a liquidsolid inter-
action with a solid nal phase, the indices g and l change
in l and s, respectively). Force is valid for both con-
tinuous or discontinuous media. Obviously, the currents
assessment needs to analytically determine the right
phenomenological coecients, which often is a dicult
task. Second, force must be not dened in the ideal
points, because otherwise it should take at the same time
and with the same probability two opposite values, cor-
responding to the elementary processes at hand, with
opposite signs of the homologue currents, which is
impossible. This property extends to the currents and to
the entropy source, not dened in an ideal point as well.
Concerning the entropy source, our conclusion contra-
dicts the current opinion, previously mentioned in this
paragraph. The set of ideal points separates the strictly
positive thermodynamic forces ( X
r
b 0), character-
ized by absorption currents, j
r
b 0, from the strictly
negative forces, ( X
r
` 0), which fact gives rise to
generating currents, j
r
` 0. The third property is related
to the force behavior near an ideal point. So far, the
specialized literature does not point out this aspect and
refers only to the total entropy increase to maximum
values when the system approaches such a point, caus-
ing the entropy source strictly positive denition. In this
work it is considered that real systems naturally making
for equilibrium obey the following postulate [26]: The
generalized thermodynamic forces of closed and open
systems continuously increase in absolute value to max-
imal nite values approaching an ideal point. Here are
included the systems with physical or chemical interac-
tions in the rst place. The phenomenological factors,
proportional to the force, must have the same force
feature.
The case of pure component interactions is important
and worth to paying a little bit more attention to. The
Eq. (34) holds here too, simply considering that x and y
take close values to 0, or 1. However, the reduced excess
heat A
r
and the term y x ( )
ds
lYr
dx
p
r
YT
r
in Eq. (33) are
vanishing when x and y approach 0 or 1, so that Eq.
(34) simplies in case of pure components, namely
X
rYp
= s
gYr
s
lYr
_ _
h
gYr
1
T
gYr
1
T
lYr
_ _
(35)
In Eq. (35), the two terms of the right member have
dierent signs, but X
rYp
is strictly negative and holds
for vaporization
X
rYpY)
= X
rYp
j
rY)
= L
11Yr
X
rYpY)
_ _
T
gYr
b T
lYr
(36)
In case of condensation, the currents are changing the
sign, therefore
X
rYpYc
= X
rYp
_ _
j
rYc
= L
11Yr
X
rYpYc
_ _
T
gYr
` T
lYr
(37)
When the system approaches an ideal point, the second
term in the right side of Eq. (35) vanishes and force
takes maximum absolute values, in accordance with the
postulate. The next paragraph includes case studies for
binary and pure component interactions.
The phenomenological coecient may be theoreti-
cally estimated making a simple imaginary experiment.
Let us consider an isolated gaseous mixture bubble, of
volume V
g
t ( ), at pressure p
g
t ( ) and temperature T
g
,
which interacts with the liquid phase surrounding it. For
convenience, it is assumed that the bubble has an iso-
therm adiabatic evolution in the liquid. In accordance
with the rst principle of thermodynamics, the variation
of its internal energy within the time unit is equal to the
power exchanged between the gas and its environment,
namely
U
X
g
= p
g
V
X
g
or,
j
r
&
l
[V
X
g
[u
g
= p
g
V
X
g
(38)
where u
g
= c
vYg
T
g
is the gas specic internal energy.
Upon absorption V
X
g
` 0, and upon generation V
X
g
b 0
and Eq. (38) is simplied to the expression
j
r
=
p
g
&
l
c
)Yg
T
g
(39)
Eq. (39) shows that positive reduced currents are
obtained upon absorption, and negative reduced cur-
rents are obtained upon generation, as previously men-
tioned herein. This equation is valid when the
homobaricity condition in the bubble is met [30]
R
X
aC
_ _
2
`` 1
where R
X
and C are the interface velocity and the velocity
of sound in gas, respectively. Physically, the above con-
dition is met in the case of mass currents with low
values, that is, anticipating the conclusions hereof, mass
currents which are far from the state of equilibrium,
when the pressure from the wall is sensibly equal to the
pressure in the rest of the gas volume and has a known
value. The determination of the phenomenological
coecient is not aected by the position of the system
relative to the point of equilibrium in respect of which it
M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167 159
has been assumed that L
11Yr
is independent of X
r
. L
11Yr
is
calculated by means of Eq. (28)
L
11Yr
=
j
r
X
r
(40)
where j
r
and X
r
are determined through an iterative
process from Eqs. (39) and respectively (34) [20]. A
similar result is obtained if, instead of the energy equa-
tion, the mass balance in the bubble is written
j
r
&
l
[V
X
[ = &
g
V
X
(41)
resulting in
j
r
=
&
g
&
l
(42)
For an ideal gas
&
g
=
p
g
RT
g
(43)
and the reduced mass ow acquires the form
j
r
=
p
g
&
l
RT
g
(44)
which is likewise valid and useful in homobaricity con-
ditions.
3. Application of phenomenological equations to the
gasliquid systems. The ideal point approaching
(I.P.A.) eect
The thermal factors involved in the calculation of the
thermodynamic force have been rst analytically
expressed for the NH
3
/H
2
O system [20], and its pure
components [26,29], by means of Ziegler and Trepp
state equation [31]. In a second step, the applications
were extended also to other known working combina-
tions, namely NH
3
/LiNO
3
and NH
3
/NaSCN, using
thermodynamic and physical property data already
published for them [32]. From the experience, the gas
liquid interactions of these systems are nonlinear and
the assumption of a linear set of phenomenological
equations needs to be justied. Indeed, the currents are
linear with respect to the thermodynamic force, only. In
fact, they are strong nonlinear with respect to all inter-
face variables through the thermal factors s
r
Y h
r
Y A
r
and
C
r
intervening in the calculation of the thermodynamic
force [31,32].
For the beginning we shall present the results of the
ammonia/water system. The phenomenological coe-
cient has been estimated by means of Eqs. (40), (39) and
(34), resulting in L
11Yr
= 10
3
[R[
1
= 1a8314. Prior to
starting the application, we paid special attention to the
consistency of the thermodynamic force equation with
respect to the equilibrium thermodynamics, regarding
the ideal points calculation of a gasliquid system and
particularly of the ammoniawater mixtures. As we
already mentioned, the force is not dened in an ideal
point and never cancels. Practically, such a point is
determined by progressively restricting the interval of
denition throughout which the function has nite
values, of equal absolute value and contrary signs, up to
the desired level of accuracy (here usually obtained up
to the sixth decimal). In principle, the two approaches,
equilibrium and phenomenological, are equivalent, as
far as the determination of the ideal point is concerned.
However, although in both cases the same state equa-
tion for the binary mixture under study has been used,
the phenomenological calculus have led to sensibly dif-
ferent results in some parts of the solubility eld [20].
First attempts to approach the results of the two meth-
ods failed when a nonlinear dependence of the mass
current with respect to the thermodynamic force was
considered. This explains why we used only a linear
dependence of the mass current with respect to the
thermodynamic force [Eq. (24)]. Best results were
obtained amplifying the second term of the denomi-
nator in Eq. (34) by a match function M p
rYe
Y x
e
( ),
already mentioned in Section 2. Several values of the
match function are given in Fig. 1 for ve reduced ideal
pressures and ve ideal solution mass fractions. These
values were good correlated by a four-order double
polynomial expansion:
Fig. 1. Several values of the match function in Eq. (34) for
ammonia/water gasliquid mixtures (p
b
= 10Lai; T
b
= 100 K).
Fig. 1. Plusieurs valeurs correspondent a Eq. (34) pour les mel-
anges ammoniaceau (gazliquide) (p
b
=10 bar ; T
b
= 100 K).
160 M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167
M p
rYe
Y x
e
_ _
= ex
4
iYj=0
A
iYj
p
i
rYe
x
j
e
_ _
(45)
The coecients A
iYj
are given below:
A
00
= 1X55107 10
0
; A
01
= 4X30114 10
0
;
A
02
= 2X50709 10
1
; A
03
= 5X14562 10
1
;
A
04
= 3X53064 10
1
; A
10
= 2X20458 10
1
;
A
11
= 3X43605 10
2
; A
12
= 2X15534 10
3
;
A
13
= 5X56704 10
3
; A
14
= 4X87992 10
3
;
A
20
= 5X72617 10
1
; A
21
= 9X54441 10
2
;
A
22
= 6X00841 10
3
; A
23
= 1X54652 10
4
;
A
24
= 1X35339 10
4
; A
30
= 5X53949 10
1
;
A
31
= 9X34452 10
2
; A
32
= 5X88969 10
3
;
A
33
= 1X51448 10
4
; A
34
= 1X32402 10
4
;
A
40
= 1X74164 10
1
; A
41
= 2X94977 10
2
;
A
42
= 1X86140 10
3
; A
43
= 4X78901 10
3
;
A
44
= 4X18852 10
3
The relative dierences (%) in the approximation of
equilibrium mass fraction of the mixture solution with
Eq. (34), are plotted in Fig. 2. The dierences could
come also from the dierent units used for x
e
, namely
mass fraction in hx diagram, respectively molar frac-
tion in the equation of state of Ziegler and Trepp, and
the use of a unique computing value for the phenomen-
ological coecient. Eq. (34) covers an usual domain for
refrigeration purposes with the NH
3
/H
2
O system,
namely of 1.04p415.0 bar, 0.14x40.45 and
0.54y40.998.
The presence of the match function in force equation
must be explained, because a less experienced reader
may think that its use was necessary to compensate for
the much simplify assumptions considered in our theo-
retical approach. In fact, M p
rYe
Y x
e
( ) compensates the
arbitrarily chosen zero reference state of a system gas/
liquid enthalpy and entropy, which Eq. (34) is quite
sensitive to. To this extent, Eq. (45) is valid for Ziegler
and Trepp work, only.
Prior to using Eq. (34) in an evolution process
assessment, we need the ``nearest'' ideal point which the
system evolves to, in order to calculate the match func-
tion. Normally, this should result from an iterative cal-
culus, searching, according to a Prigogine theorem, the
way of minimum entropy production. However, not all
but in many cases a simpler practical method can be
considered, remarking that most systems have state
parameters with quasiconstant values all along the evo-
lution period, provening from their connection with the
innite reservoirs or other engineering purposes etc.
Depending on the system variance, these parameters
partially or completely dene the nearest ideal point. In
our case, the ammonia/water system is biphase and
bicomponent, so it suces to have two such parameters,
but the type of the parameters may change upon the
specic application. For instance, for the absorption
process of a closed system absorption refrigeration
plant, these parameters are the rich solution nal tem-
perature, close to the sink source temperature and the
absorbed gas molar fraction, but for the generation
process, they change to the nal poor solution tem-
perature, close to the warm source temperature and the
condensing pressure. In case of the bubble absorption
experience, mentioned in the introduction, the nearest
ideal point is dened by the quasiconstant absorption
pressure (p
l
= p
g
) and gas molar fraction y.
The phenomenological Eqs. (27), (28), (31) and (34)
have been represented for exemplication as partial
functions of the reduced state parameters xY t
lYr
Y y and
t
gYr
, respectively, in Figs. 37 for the NH
3
/H
2
O system
(at interface, gas and liquid are in mechanical equili-
brium, p
l
p
g
, and no pressure partial functions exist in
fact). The thermodynamic force of pure components
water and ammonia is given in two study cases in Fig. 8,
and that of NH
3
/LiNO
3
and NH
3
/NaSCN systems in
four study cases in Figs 9 and 10, respectively. The
curves are dierent in shape, depending upon the vari-
able used in the abscissa and the nature of the system.
Partial functions which depend on the parameters of the
same phase have the same absorption or generation
monotonous variation. According to the postulate and
its consequence, the diagrams show the continuously
increase to nite values of force, entropy source, and of
the coupled mass and heat currents, approaching an
ideal state. In case of currents, an ideal point approach-
ing (i.p.a) eect is emphasized: depending on how strong
Fig. 2. The relative dierences % in the approximation of
equilibrium mass fraction of ammonia/water solutions with Eq.
(34).
Fig. 2. Dierences entre la fraction massique des solutions
ammoniac / eau et l'Eq. (34), exprime en pourcentages.
M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167 161
the currents coupling is, the approach to an ideal state
determines an increase eect of the function absolute
value by several percent (in case of pure components), to
several hundred times (for the binary systems), as com-
pared to the states which are far from the same ideal
point. In this way, the term of ``far from equilibrium
state'' changes its classical meaning and corresponds to
its opposite, namely of ``low interaction''. The i.p.a.
eect may be quantied by a gure of merit, ``f '', equal
to the ratio of two same type (absorption/condensation
or generation/vaporization) function values, corre-
sponding to the states closer, respectively, further to the
ideal state. Figs. 310 include also the maximal ``f ''
values for the chosen examples. As a direct consequence
from the above it results that estimation of the interface
mass transfer by analogy with heat transfer lacks basic
physics. Force in Eq. (2) tends to zero approaching an
ideal point, which is not true, therefore is erroneous.
The specialized literature does not contain systematic
theoretical or experimental accounts of the non-equili-
brium interaction at hand which the results obtained
herein might be compared to. The only conrmation of
such results is given by their compliance with a few
experimental works which are in agreement with the
graphs shown in Figs. 310, proving the increase of the
gaseous mass ow driven as a two-phase binary system
Fig. 4. The i.p.a. eect for the reduced mass (a) and heat cur-
rent (b) as functions of solution mass fraction.
Fig. 4. L'eet i.p.a de la masse reduite (a) et le ux de chaleur
(b) en fonction des fractions de masse de la solution.
Fig. 5. The i.p.a. eect behavior for the reduced entropy source (a)
and thermodynamic force (b) as functions of solution temperature.
Fig. 5. Comportement de l'eet i.p.a. pour la source d'entropie
diminuee (a) et la force thermodynamique (b) en fonction de la
temperature de la solution.
Fig. 3. The i.p.a. eect behavior for the reduced entropy source (a)
and thermodynamic force (b) as functions of solution mass fraction.
Fig. 3. Comportement de l'eet i.p.a. pour la source d'entropie
diminuee (a) et la force thermodynamique (b) en fonction des
fractions de masse de la solution.
162 M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167
is approaching a state of saturation. To this eect,
mention should be made of the experimental work of
Hui and Thome [33], who investigated the boiling of
binary azeotropic ethanolwater and ethanolbenzene
mixtures and ascertained the increase of the number of
vaporization points, until it became impossible for such
points to be individually distinguished, as the molar
fraction of the mixtures approached the saturation
value.
4. The PhHGD approach of the single bubble absorption
The author used the PhHGD approach to model local
absorption/generation processes in the ammonia/water
system [20]. Because generation in an absorption plant
passes more or less through a sequence of ideal points,
but absorption, on the contrary, working usually with
rectied vapor is far from the ideal point and takes place
therefore at low gasliquid interaction, the author paid
more attention to the absorption process. However,
taking into account the ndings of Section 3, he had
additional good reasons to model the bubble absorp-
tion: (i) it was used to satisfactorily explain the ammonia
bubble absorption problem, raised in the introduction;
(ii) it contributed to a simpler experimental validation of
the PhHGD method [20,28], and (iii) it served to perform
an analytical study of absorption for the system at hand,
based on the single bubble dynamics. Here we present
only a few results referring to the rst point and some
conclusions of the analytical study.
Fig. 7. The i.p.a. eect behavior for the reduced entropy source
(a) and thermodynamic force (b) as functions of gas reduced
temperature.
Fig. 7. Comportement de l'eet i.p.a. pour la source d'entropie
diminuee (a) et la force thermodynamique (b) en fonction de la
temperature reduite des gaz.
Fig. 6. The i.p.a. eect behavior for the reduced entropy source (a)
and thermodynamic force (b) as functions of gas mass fraction.
Fig. 6. Comportement de l'eet i.p.a. pour la source d'entropie
diminuee (a) et la force thermodynamique (b) en fonction des
fractions de masse des gaz.
Fig. 8. The water and ammonia i.p.a. eect behavior for the
reduced thermodynamic force as function of liquidgas reduced
temperature.
Fig. 8. Impact du comportement l'eet i.p.a. de l'ammoniac / eau
pour le force thermodynamique reduite en fonction de la tem-
perature reduite du melange liquide / gaz.
M.D. Staicovici / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 153167 163
Absorption takes place between gas and the sub-
cooled absorbent, when forces and currents are positive.
The set of the PhHGD code entry data corresponds to
the absorption of the ammonia bubble (y=0.992) in
water (x
= 10
4
), at normal pressure (p
= 1X001 bar)
and environment temperature (T