Analysis On Total Factor Productivity Changes and Efficiency in Construction Industry From The Year 1997 2009

Economic Management Journal
1997~2009
430079
DEA 1997-2009 TFP
TFP
DEA
Analysis on Total Factor Productivity Changes and Efficiency in

Construction Industry from the Year 1997-2009
Dongdong Huang
School of Economics and Management of Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan, China, 430079
Abstract: The paper evaluates the total factor productivity of Chinese construction industry from 1997 to 2009 based on DEA models,
and analyzes the causes and process of TFP changes. The results show that technological progress is the main source of growth for TFP.
The growth mode of construction industry is changing from an extensive one to an intensive one. By comparing efficiency indicators of
the construction industry from different provinces, we found that the efficiency indicators of Shanghai, Beijing, and Zhejiang are in the
leading level in our country, whose construction industries are with reasonable scale and advanced technology.
Key words: Construction; DEA; Total Factor Productivity; Technical Efficiency
GDP 30 10%
9.46% 11.04%[1]
1978 3.8%
2009
76807.74 GDP 22.9%
SFAStochastic Frontier Analysis

DEAData Envelopent Analysis
DEA
[2][3][4] 1981~1996
[5]2007
1996~2003
EMJ July 2012 Vol.1 Iss.1 pp.9-15 www.em-j.org 2012 American V-King Scientific Publishing, LTD | 9

[6]2009 DEA
1997 2009
Malmquist DEA
DEA CharnesCoopor Rhodes 1978
DMU, Decision Making Units

DEA DEA
DEA
EDA Malmquist Malmquist 1953
CavesChristensen Diewert 1982 DEA Malmquist 1994 Fare
Malmquist
k 1
k 1
Lt ( y t | C , S ) [( x1t ,, xNt ) : ykt ,m zkt ykt ,m , m 1, , M ; zkt xnt ,k xkt ,n ,

n 1, , N ; z 0, k 1,, K ]
t
k
z x y C
Farrell
K
Fi t ( y t , x t | C , S ) m i n k s.t ykt ,m zkt ykt ,m , m 1, , M

k 1
z x
t
k
k 1
t
k ,n
k xkt ,n , n 1, , N ; z kt 0, k 1, , K
t
Farrell Fi ( y , x | C , S ) 1
t
Fi ( y , x | C , S ) =1
Di ( y , x ) 1 / Fi ( y , x | C , S ) t t+1 Malmquist
t
M it Dit ( x t , y t ) / Dit ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
M it 1 Dit 1 ( x t , y t ) / Dit 1 ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
M i ( x t 1 , y t 1 ; x t , y t ) {[
Dit ( x t , y t )
Dit 1 ( x t , y t ) 1/ 2
]
[
]}
Dit ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
Dit 1 ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
Dit ( x t , y t )
Dit 1 ( x t 1 , y t 1 ) Dit 1 ( x t , y t ) 1/ 2
[
t t t ]
Dit 1 ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
Dit ( x t 1 , y t 1 )
Di ( x , y )
EC ( x t 1 , y t 1 ; x t , y t ) TC ( x t 1 , y t 1 ; x t , y t )
t 1
t 1
EC TC M i ( x , y ; x , y ) 1 t t+1
t 1
t 1
M i ( x , y ; x , y ) 1 t+1 t EC TC 1 1 1
10 | EMJ July 2012 Vol.1 Iss.1 pp.9-15 www.em-j.org 2012 American V-King Scientific Publishing, LTD

EC
D0t ( X t , Yt | C )
D0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 | C )
D0t ( X t , Yt | C ) / D0t ( X t , Yt | V )
D0t ( X t , Yt | V )
D0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 | C ) / D0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 | V ) D0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 | V )
SE0t ( X t , Yt )
D0t ( X t , Yt | V )
SE PTE
SE0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 ) D0t 1 ( X t 1 , Yt 1 | V )
ECPTESE
M i ( X t , Yt , X t 1 , Yt 1 ) TFP EC TC SE PTE TC
2
2.1
DEA -
1996
1997
6 18
1997 1997~2009
2.2
Goldsmith 1951
[8]
Kit Kit 1 (1 it ) I it
i i
t K
I
1997
Ki
Yi
K1997
Y1997
K i 1997 Yi 1997 Y1997

Y1997 1997
1
2002 8%I
1997
1 Malmquist
1998
0.838
1.132
0.882
0.953
0.946
1999
0.854
1.078
0.908
0.941
0.921
2000
0.889
1.086
0.869
1.024
0.966
2001
0.951
1.171
0.971
0.979
1.112
2002
0.971
1.113
0.966
1.006
1.081
2003
0.928
1.175
0.94
0.987
1.09
2004
0.919
1.228
0.945
0.972
1.129
2005
1.069
0.986
1.066
1.003
1.055
2006
0.976
1.141
0.991
0.985
1.114
2007
0.893
1.236
0.928
0.963
1.104
2008
0.910
1.183
0.922
0.987
1.076
2009
0.985
1.093
0.961
1.024
1.076
mean
0.930
1.133
0.944
0.985
1.054
3.1
Malmquist TFP
1997-2009
5.4% 13.3% 2005 1
2005 1
1998-2000 1 TFP
2000 TFP
2004 12.9% 22.8% 1999 TPF
0.921 2000 2002 2005
2009 1
2005
1 0.944
3.2
20 90 TFP
2008 DEA 1996-2005 10
0.5%

1997-2009 DEA Malmquist
13 TFP 0.54%
13 TFP
1997-2000 TFP
2000
1999 1
600
2001-2004
TFP 10.3%
17.18%
21 WTO
2005
2005 88604
25.7% 15759 TFP
3.3
DEA
TFP EC TC SE PTE TC , TFP
ln TFP ln EC ln TC ln SE ln TE ln TC
TFP
1.000
1.127
1.000
1.000
1.127
1.000
1.126
1.000
1.000
1.126
1.000
1.120
1.000
1.000
1.120
0.980
1.124
0.982
0.998
1.101
0.979
1.122
0.983
0.996
1.099
0.968
1.131
1.000
0.968
1.095
0.971
1.121
1.000
0.971
1.088
0.958
1.125
0.978
0.979
1.077
0.949
1.131
0.955
0.994
1.073
0.962
1.110
0.966
0.996
1.068
0.940
1.134
0.947
0.993
1.066
0.933
1.141
0.934
1.000
1.065

2
0.934
1.141
0.936
0.998
1.065
0.949
1.121
0.963
0.986
1.064
0.929
1.131
0.939
0.989
1.051
0.917
1.145
0.917
0.999
1.050
0.915
1.139
1.000
0.915
1.042
0.915
1.136
0.917
0.998
1.040
0.918
1.133
0.925
0.992
1.040
0.914
1.137
0.914
1.000
1.039
0.910
1.140
0.910
1.000
1.037
0.906
1.144
0.963
0.941
1.037
0.905
1.141
0.913
0.992
1.033
0.907
1.135
0.910
0.997
1.030
0.901
1.137
0.903
0.998
1.025
0.898
1.137
0.906
0.990
1.020
0.884
1.145
0.914
0.967
1.012
0.898
1.126
0.900
0.998
1.011
0.880
1.142
0.882
0.997
1.004
0.866
1.147
0.884
0.980
0.993
0.871
1.130
0.960
0.908
0.984
mean
0.930
1.133
0.944
0.985
1.054
TFP
1
1
4
Malmquist 1997~2009

1997~2009 1.33%
TFP
[1] , . [J]. , 2009 10 .

[2] , ,. : 1996~2005 [J]. , 2008 11 .
[3] . [J]. , 2009 10 .
[4] , . [J]. (), 2000 10 .
[5] , ,. [J]. , 2007 10 .
[6] , . DEA [J]. (), 2009 4 .
[7] , , . [J]. (), 2003 1 .
[8] , , . : 1952~2000[J]. , 2004 10 .
[9] , , . [M]. : , 2009.
[10] . : 1979~2008 [M]. : , 2009.
[11] . 1979~2008 [M]. : , 2009.
2009
E-maildongdong997399@163.com

Analysis On Total Factor Productivity Changes and Efficiency in Construction Industry From The Year 1997 2009

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Analysis On Total Factor Productivity Changes and Efficiency in Construction Industry From The Year 1997 2009

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Economic Management Journal