Inside major intentional smart synchronization architecture is involving within following fatal focus ons

Said Mchaalia (draft copy September 29th, 2013)

Introduction: Dear best friendly reader and "symbolic Satan across modeling's intelligence", herewith, I, Said Mchaalia, would like to send thou this gift for ahead Professor at Munich technical university due to the old mistake inside the measurable core's processing, whom major intentional smart synchronization architecture is involving within following fatal focus ons: 1. invent music adjustment secrets to satisfy soul's symbolic smooth secret across intentional investigation inside any manufacturing inspiration surrounding advances:

fuck Susanne up fuck Susanne down inset what if this close to wish to kiss to do to rue

fuck Susanne up fuck Susanne down inset what if this a flow to wish to kiss to do to rue

fuck Susanne up fuck Susanne down inset what if this close to wish to kiss to do to rue fuck Susanne up fuck Susanne down inset what if this a flow to wish to kiss to do to rue fuck Susanne up fuck Susanne down inset what if this a flow to wish to kiss to do to rue

2. Intel's failure measurement around the frequency's fashion flow:

McKinsey = want to buy a 4 GHz processor computer for highest resolution across space simulation within all probable mobile satellite system's architectures? McLean = do thou know that Albert Einstein did a big great mistake within the measurable core's processing during the determination of exactly true value of frequency, thus: lambda . Nu = constant 2.99*10.e.8 is false, because the Berkeley test try trips around the electrical energy's fashion flow during hearken Catherine and other hearkens, require the symbolic smart sensor of velocity to indicate the exactly true values of electrical energy's coming from clouds during simulation time of hearkens. McDonals = not only the mathematical intentional amount quantity " lambda . Nu = constant 2.99*10.e.8 " is wrong, but many of actual working of Grid inventors are false and hurrying huge hard wrong, for example look in deep in the details of this paper: "December 2011,Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 571-581. A system-centric metric for the evaluation of online job schedules. Uwe Schwiegelshohn .... Uwe Schwiegelshohn uwe.schwiegelshohn@udo.edu" McMillan = see primary minister of Canada to deal with the missing thesis of an unknown "Mc" name, whom old inventors did think up of its highest holy hierarchy within human chaotic stochastic probabilistic segment ]0, 1[ measurable centric major motor kernel within any "Cm = lord making progress within handling across IA, thanks God". McLean = who is this? McDonals = Said Mchaalia, who was coming to Montreal since June 06th 2006 in McKay Street and did quit within the permission of the primary minister of Canada after asking to continue within the research inside the measuring centric system's architectures across manufacturing industrial secrets, but it was no symbolic synchronization.

I/ Said Mchaalia = soul's symbolic synchronization across smart Satan at modeling's inspiration:

Hence, the symbolic synchronized {(clear, not), (digit, event), (surround

smart secret custom, under consumer's seals), (scaling<up, down>stair, frequency's fashion flow)} dynamic design around the modeling's inspiration consist to first of all define the requirement across the environment reality flow as follows:

1.

clear = +tg(v) for any v such that 2.k.pi < v < 5.k.pi/2

2. clear = -tg(v) for any v such that 5.k.pi/2 < v <(2.k + 1).pi 3. digit = increment(initial = 0) until final = last = 9 4. event = (slice of time within t=n.T, event's value), for more details see
the primordial principles of discrete event simulation.

5. surround smart secret custom = valuable variable extensible (its

transmission's transportation is based on safe transition translation inside logics language of system's adjustment and signal's architectures).

6. under consumer's seal = current node's operation processing, during

"token simulation" within any virtualism dynamic mechanism processing.

7.

scaling<up, down>stair = first of all {stair = a set of steps leading from one floor of a building to another, typically inside the building: he came up the stairs thus a single step in a set of stairs: the bottom stair}, second of all scaling<up, down> is a type definition structure involving within the Cox and C++ program types. Hence, to identify the scaling<up, down> :: iterator it, a requirement of environment reality flow engendering two keys ((*it).first, (*it).second) is then handling all statement iteration and across dynamic processing design.

8. frequency's fashion flow : this is the huge hard hierarchy home of

dealing with failure, mistake, measurable core's proceeding, modeling's inspiration, mathematical intention, mechanism secrets, etc ... Hence, within the failure of lambda . Nu = constant, the major most thread task of programming dynamic design across measurable core's for exactly true values, consist to use Intel's measurable unit = million instruction per second, but how many exactly for any processor type? Said Mchaalia did invent two dynamic designs across the mathematical inspiration surrounding the system's architectures inside the modeling's intelligence, which have to be defined as follows: i. sqr[sin(2.pi.f.t)] = ratio of (times(event(byte = char))) to

sum( (times(event(byte = char)))) = times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))

Thus, the following software could then measure the required parameters: #include <cstdio> #include <cstdlib> #include <cmath> #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <map> using namespace std; typedef map<int, float> Process_Map; typedef map<char, vector<int> > Storage_Map; int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { while (argc > 1) { typedef map<char, vector<int> >::iterator it = Storage_Map.begin(); i = 0; FILE *fptr =fopen( argv[1], "r"); char *pch; char ch; fscanf(fptr, "%c", ch); if((*it).find(ch)) { ((*it).second).push_back(i++);

} else { ((*it).insert(xx); ++i; } } return 0; }

Hence, execute this program for a file within just one character "a" or other "b" or "C", etc .. to get the float=times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char)))) then, sqr[sin(2.pi.f.t)] = float = times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char)))), whereby times(event(char)) = times of reading just one character file and sum( (times(event(byte = char)))) = times of reading just one character file + 1 (end of file char = eof).

Thus,

f = [1/(2.pi.t)].(arcsin[sqrt[times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))]]) just ask any of Intel's firm's worker to run this frequency test try to validate the proposal envisage frequency values, due to the failure within the formula: Lambda . Nu = constant of many.

On the other hand, an other proposal treatment consist to use the formula across the information theory of Claude Shannon, whereby:

p = float= times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))

p.Log(1/p) = [p/Ln(10)].[Ln(1/p)] = sqr[sin(2.pi.f.t)] such that 0<= sin(2.pi.f.t) <= 1.

Hence,

[p/Ln(10)].[Ln(1/p)] = sqr[sin(2.pi.f.t)] such that 0<= sin(2.pi.f.t) <= 1. Implies the following equalities within frequency's fashion flows:

[( times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char)))))/Ln(10)]. [Ln(1/[ times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))])] = sqr[sin(2.pi.f.t)] such that 0<= sin(2.pi.f.t) <= 1. Notice, that the t is equal to the required time to read the corresponding file. Then, end frequency's fashion flow computing is done as follows:

f = [1/(2.pi.t)]. arcsin[sqrt[[( times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char)))))/Ln(10)].[Ln(1/[ times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))])]]] Conclusion:

within Said Mchaalia ideal idea dealing with frequency's fashion flow to validate the major intentional secret around the Watt's insight and the secret of frequency's fashion flows involving within the Kirchhoff liable law (L.C.sqr(2.pi.f.t) = 1 for any (inductor L, capacitor C) filter), did propose the following measurable core's around the frequency's measurable core processing, which has modeling's inspiration based on built in information theory of mathematical intentional system's architectures by Claude Shannon within following amount quantity: p.Log(1/p), which is defined for any p such that 0<= p <= 1 and has to be involved within boundary limits 0 and 1 such that for any p, such that 0<= p <= 1, the amount quantity p.Log(1/p) verifies, 0 <= p.Log(1/p) <= 1, why should this be don?

First of all due the mathematical inspiration of the normal distribution exp(b.x.y), where b > 0, x =>0 (for timing slice definition), y=>0 (for frequency fashion flow) of old Gauss.

Hence, Said Mchaalia proposal similar modeling's inspiration has to define frequency as follows: f = [1/(2.pi.t)].(arcsin[sqrt[times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))]]) f = [1/(2.pi.t)]. arcsin[sqrt[[( times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char)))))/Ln(10)].[Ln(1/[ times(event(byte = char)) / sum( (times(event(byte = char))))])]]]

Just write software to resolve above equations, to bring up major intentional secret across mathematical inspiration around modeling's inspiration and mode's intelligence for any soul's satisfaction around manufacturing integration and system architectures.