Research Team
Lead Analyst Research Director
Federico Baguear
Industry Analyst Healthcare LATAM (+54 11) 4777 7060 Federico.Baguear@frost.com
Eduardo Golisano
Business Leader Unit Healthcare LATAM (+54 11) Phone number Eduardo.golisano@frost.com
Reenita Das
Senior Vice President, Asia Pacific & Latin America
<NB06-48>
Contents
Section Executive Summary Market Overview Definitions Segmentation Discussion Key Questions This Study Will Answer Economical Background External Challenges: Drivers and RestraintsTotal Market Forecasts and Trends Demand Analysis Market Share and Competitive AnalysisTotal Market Slide Numbers 5 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 30 38 41
<NB06-48>
Contents
Section Argentina Breakdown Brazil Breakdown Mexico Breakdown The Last Word (Conclusions and Implications) The Frost & Sullivan Story Slide Numbers 48 79 104 130 133
<NB06-48>
Executive Summary
<NB06-48>
Executive Summary
The purpose of this study is to analyze the Argentinean, Brazilian, and Mexican the picture archiving communication system (PACS) market with regard to revenue, installed base, market share, and competitive scenario. In 2011, the PACS installed base in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico reached 5.5 percent. Although the region is still far behind North America and Europe in terms of penetration of the solutions where the installed base reaches more than 70.0 percent, the high growth of the industry is likely to change this scenario in the medium and long term. The appealing return on investment (ROI) model allows for immediate cost reductions associated with replacing analog film printing and distribution with digital image viewing and communication. Hospitals and diagnostic centers are integrating and creating larger groups; IT solutions, including PACSs, are becoming a necessity for this integration and for better workflow for the institutions. There are increasing investments being made in local PACS companies, such Intel Capitals investment in the Brazilian PACS company Pixeon. There are more sophisticated products and softwares with technologies that have never been used in the healthcare area before, such as Microsofts Kinect and Cloud computing.
<NB06-48>
The most representative and mature market for this solution is Brazil, representing 73.7 percent of the 2011 total market revenue, with an installed base of 1,483 PACSs. Mexico represents the 10.7 percent of the 2011 total market revenue, with 1,860 installed PACSs. Argentina represents 4.4 percent of the 2011 total market revenue, with 341 installed PACSs.
In 2011, the total Latin American market presented a revenue of $81.11 million and will reach $372.57 million by 2017, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2011 to 2017 of 28.9 percent.
Mergers and acquisitions are expected to shape the evolution of the Brazilian market.
<NB06-48>
Growth
$81.1 M
(2011)
638
(2011) (2010)
$170,000
(2011)
$372.6 M
(2017)
Market Concentration
27.5%
28.9%
(CAGR)
7
(scale:1 [Low] to 10 [High])
Low
(2011; scale:1 [Low] to 10 [High])
53.4%
(% of market share held by top 3 companies)
<NB06-48>
Slide 8 SR9 The link is not opening to the correct slide. Pls check.
Sudatta Roy, 9/4/2012
17
(active market competitors in base year)
0
(2011)
$320,000
(2011)
$140,000
(2011)
$60,000
(2011)
Decreasing
Stable
Increasing
<0000-00>
New business models are enabling new adopters of the solution. By 2017, revenue will reach $372.6 million, led by Carestream, with 21.7 percent of the market share.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. 10
<NB06-48>
Market Overview
<NB06-48>
11
Market OverviewDefinitions
The picture archiving communication system (PACS) is an intelligent storage system that sends, recovers, and processes images. PACS solutions provide a secure database for medical images and allow the sharing of medical images across different platforms. PACS is an IT system that can be integrated with other platforms, such as radiology information systems (RIS), hospital information systems (HIS), electronic health record (EHR), and electronic patient record (EPR), among others.
The major advantages of PACS are time saving and cost reduction by reducing image hard copies, favoring diagnoses, and enabling future consultation of patients examinations. PACS is capable of comparing images on the same computer desktop screen. In addition, advanced PACSs possess 3D construction of images for research and advanced diagnostic purposes.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
12
<NB06-48>
13
<NB06-48>
14
Market OverviewSegmentation
Key Takeaway: The middle PACS that connects small hospitals and diagnostic imaging centers is the most installed solution. Installed Base Breakdown Total PACS Market: LATAM, 2011
Mini-PACSs 38%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
15
Market OverviewDiscussion
In the beginning of the adoption cycle, IT solutions were restricted to huge hospitals and laboratories. Only large institutions could afford these solutions, having the extra budget to invest in this kind of technology. Nowadays, IT systems are a reality for medium and small healthcare institutions, although the installed base for these segments is significantly smaller. Major standards governing the RIS and PACS workflow are digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM ) and health level 7 (HL7). PACS is the primary module to which DICOM and HL7 standards have quickly and continuously evolved. Therefore, a brokera software and hardware unit that takes the HL7 messages and maps them to produce DICOM messages for PACS interpretationis installed to make the legacy RIS compatible with PACS. However, there are drawbacks to installing a broker: paper-based workflow is required and legacy RIS being unidirectional implies that multiple duplicative databases are produced.
<NB06-48>
16
Is the market growing, how long will it continue to grow and at what rate?.
Is this an industry or a market? Will these companies/products/services continue to exist or will they be acquired by other companies? Will the products/services become features in other markets?
How will the structure of the market change with time? Is it ripe for acquisitions?
Are the products/services offered today meeting customer needs or is there additional development needed? Are the vendors in the space ready to go it alone, or do they need partnerships to take their business to the next level?
<NB06-48>
17
50 0
Source: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 2011-10-14 and Frost and Sullivan analysis..
<NB06-48>
18
<NB06-48>
19
Market Drivers
Increased volume of data encourages PACS installations Consolidation of healthcare institutions is expected to require integration of databases among hospitals New PACS business models are expected to fulfill every healthcare institution budget Teleradiology expands the PACS market Rise of medical tourism is expected to enforce investments
Market Restraints
Small budget for IT solutions dissuades the installation of PACS Lack of basic infrastructure in LATAM constrains the implementation of PACS Lack of specialized IT professionals limit the work force of the PACS providers
Impact: <0000-00>
High
Medium
Low
20
Drivers Explained
ROI becoming more recognized among institutions
Because it is software, the return on investment (ROI) of PACS solutions has not been as visible to the health institutions as the diagnostic imaging equipment, which generate revenue. Thus, these solutions were almost an exclusive privilege of large clinics and hospitals. Today, this scenario has evolved, and even small institutions can see the value and benefit of PACSs, such as the reduction of more than 50.0 percent of film consumption, improvement of the quality of diagnosis, and also greater flexibility in decision-making.
<NB06-48>
21
<NB06-48> .
22
Health providers are increasingly consolidating and forming huge groups of hospitals or diagnosis centers, laboratories, and private health plans. This consolidation makes the purchase of higher value-added products easier because the institutions can negotiate better rates due to the high demand. The groups will need IT software in order to ensure the integration of databases among hospitals. In Argentina, for example, Swiss Medical Group bought many small hospitals like Clinica Olvios and is building a new institution with 120 beds. Larger groups provide greater negotiation power to decrease costs and increase profits. In Brazil, examples of this consolidation are Fleury, Diagnstico das Amricas (DASA), Rede Dor, and the Alliar Group. In Mexico, the three main private hospital firms are StarMedica, AmeriMed, and Grupo Angeles are building new hospitals. .
<NB06-48>
23
Multinational companies are developing and implementing more accessible business models that focus on the low budget market segment that do not yet have PACS solutions. These model businesses are rental, pay-per-use, and cloud-based pay-per-use.
o
Some companies offer to rent PACS software by image diagnostic modality, which means that the institution pays monthly for the type of equipment they use. Pay-per-use allows healthcare institutions to install PACS and pay for every study managed by the software. The cloud-based model provides a low-cost solution that avoids high investment in hardware such as servers, diagnostic workstations, storage, and IT staff wages. In this case, the institution pays a fixed value of approximately $2 for each exam sent to the cloud.
In Argentina, there have been partnership agreements within telecommunication and PACS companies (e.g., Telecom Argentina signed a partnership agreement with Carestream in 2009, while AGFA signed with Telefonica Argentina, and Philips offers Iron Mountain cloud services).
<NB06-48>
24
Teleradiology implementation
Teleradiology is a very common concept today. A related concept, night hawking, is where images are sent to outsourcing centers at night (i.e. India), and reports are generated and sent back electronically in time for the doctors to send in their diagnosis.
Although this is becoming a very common practice and reducing costs, in Argentina, teleradiology is used just to ask for a second opinion, academia research, or to diagnose away from the medical institution.
In Mexico, the government has implemented an e-HCare for the users of the SPSS, a smart cardbased solution that allows the doctor to access a patients information and add new data to it. There are 91,000 million mobile cellular phones in Mexico (mobile penetration is 77.2 percent of total population, which ranks 11th in the world). This opens an impressive market for mHealth, which is expected to influence the PACS market.
<NB06-48>
25
Latin America is expected to continue to grow as hub for medical tourism, with a $7.0 billion business in 2015, led by Brazil and Mexico.
global
Brazil will present a CAGR of 28.0 percent until 2015, becoming a $2.1 billion business. Mexico will receive investments of more than $700 million for the construction of new hospitals. Healthcare IT solutions, such as PACS, are crucial to maintain the high standard of medical treatments. Medical procedure costs are significantly lower than other countries like United States, Canada, and Europe. Mexicos proximity to North America is a big advantage for the attraction of medical tourists versus Brazil or Argentina.
<NB06-48>
26
Restraints Explained
Small budget for IT solutions dissuades the installation of PACSs
There is a high level of resistance to acquire IT software in hospitals, clinics, and laboratories. This is reflected in the low budget designated for these solutions in both public and private clinics and hospitals. In Brazil, not even 5.0 percent of the government funding is intended for investment in these solutions. According to the annual report of the Brazilian Association of Private Hospitals, in 2011, this number was only 3.0 percent. Multinational companies provide robust solutions, but with a high price. This represents an advantage to local companies because of the lack of investment in healthcare IT. In addition, the hourly rate of a multinational service engineer is higher than that of local companies, so system customization is very expensive. Depending on the solution provided, PACSs require an IT department in the healthcare institution. In contrast with the decreasing hardware costs, human resources are increasing due to the regional economy and lack of specialized IT engineers. In public institutions, there is a conservative attitude toward the radiology technical personnel to adopt to an advanced technology such as PACS. Moreover, in Argentina, some film distributors pay a percentage of money for the films consumed.
<NB06-48>
27
<NB06-48>
28
<NB06-48>
29
<NB06-48>
30
Market Stage (Nascent, Growth, Mature) Market Revenue (2011) Market Shipment Units (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Enterprise PACS Average Price Per Unit: Middle PACS Average Price Per Unit: Mini-PACS Revenue at End of Forecast Period (2017) Base Year Revenue Growth Rate Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), 20112017 Customer Price Sensitivity (scale of 1 to 10, Low to High) Market Concentration (% of base year market controlled by top three competitors)
Growth $ 81.1M 638 $320,000 $140,000 $60,000 $372.5 27.5 28.9 7 53.4
31
Note: *= Weighted Average Selling Price. All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
Region Background
Brazil is considered one of the leading emerging economies together with China, India, and Russia. It is also part of the MERCOSUR with Argentina, a commercial agreement that is under a high debate due many restrictions that both countries are applying. Mexico has several commercial agreements with other countries and it is positioned well geographically near the U.S. and Canada. It is part of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). In 2012, the Mexican FDA (Food and Drug Administration), COFERIS, signed a commercial agreement with Japan to facilitate the importation of some Japanese medical devices. Brazil does not have restrictions on importation, but the government invests large amounts of money to improve the Brazilian healthcare industry. Argentina has implemented strong restrictions on imported articles. This was done with the intent to improve the local Argentinean economy.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
32
32.0 31.0
Note: All figures are rounded; the base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
30.0
Units
<NB06-48>
34
400 350
Revenue ($ Million)
28.0 150 100 50 0 2011 8.6 30.8 41.7 2012 10.1 38.3 55.0 27.5 2013 11.7 47.7 72.7 27.7 2014 13.6 59.5 96.5 28.5 Year 2015 16.2 74.6 128.4 29.3 2016 19.2 93.7 172.0 30.0 2017 23.0 118.2 231.4 30.8 27.0 26.0 25.0
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
<NB06-48>
36
<NB06-48>
37
<NB06-48>
38
LATAM PACS Market Penetration Per Region and Total Number of Exams Managed by PACS Solutions
PACS Market Penetration, LATAM, 2011 PACS Market: Number of Exams Managed by PACS Solutions, LATAM, 2011
Total 609.6
<NB06-48>
39
Methodology The potential adoption of PACS solution is 100.0 percent, which includes all hospitals and diagnostic centers in the region. It is important to note that not every diagnostic center possesses image diagnostic services. As an example, biochemical laboratories are considered diagnostic centers. The average adoption is only 5.5 percent, meaning that 3,684 healthcare institutions have a PACS solution installed. This number can be divided between 1,627 hospitals and 2,057 diagnostic centers. The higher adoption is by large hospitals, where the penetration reaches 10 percent in both public and private hospitals. The smallest adoption of PACS solutions is among small public diagnostic centers, reaching a penetration of less than 1 percent. The penetration of this solution is far higher in other regions around the world. The installed base reaches almost 80.0 percent in Europe and in North America. The installed base will reach 13,876 in 2017, with a CAGR of 24.7 percent.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
40
<NB06-48>
41
* A list of Other companies can be found at each country breakdown. Note: All figures are rounded. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
42
Philips, 12.3%
<NB06-48>
43
Philips, 10.2%
AGFA, 14.8%
* A list of Other companies can be found each country breakdown. Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
46
Competitive Environment
PACS Market: Competitive Structure,
LATAM, 2011
Number of Companies in the Market Competitive Factors Key End-user Groups Major Market Participants Market Share of Top 6 Competitors Other Notable Market Participants Distribution Structure Notable Acquisitions and Mergers 12 with revenues greater than $81 million Cost, performance, schedule, support, technology, reliability, contractor relationships, customer relationships A, B, C, and D Carestream, AGFA, Fuji, GE, Siemens, Philips 76.1% Pixeon (Brazil), Visualmedica (Argentina) Direct and Indirect Sales
<NB06-48>
47
Argentina Breakdown
<NB06-48>
48
<NB06-48>
49
In 2011, the Argentinian GDP was $447.6 billion and showed a 9.1 percent growth rate. Eight private insurance groups, OSDE, Swiss Medical, Galeno, Medicus, Medife, Omint, Consolidar, and Hospital Italiano, have 2.8 million affiliates. Due to the uncertainty created by import restrictions, the high inflation rate, and political unrest, investment decisions are being delayed.
<NB06-48>
50
Tucuman Mendoza Total: 3311 South 1,071 17% Inhabitants (Millions) Private Public 1.5 56.8 43.2 2.0 65.9 34.1
The last Pan-American Health Organization analysis report revealed that Argentina has 3,311 hospitals, of which 38 percent are public institutions and 62 percent are private facilities. The total country population is 40 million citizens. Fifty-two percent of the population have medical insurance, while the remaining 48 percent receive medical attention at public institutions (universal coverage).
Sources Panamercial Health Organization; Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
51
<NB06-48>
52
Trend
Importation restrictions and increasing film costs are expected to drive the need for PACS solutions. Lack of political willingness/decisions/interest decreases the public investments in implementing PACS.
Degree of Impact
8
Impact Timing
Present
Present
<NB06-48>
53
<NB06-48>
54
<NB06-48>
55
<NB06-48>
56
TREND
MEASUREMENT
Market Stage (Nascent, Growth, Mature) Market Revenue (2011) Penetration of PACS Solution (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Enterprise PACS Average Price Per Unit: Middle PACS (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Mini-PACS (2011) Revenue at End of Forecast Period (2017) Base Year Revenue Growth Rate Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), 20112017 Customer Price Sensitivity (scale of 1 to 10, Low to High)
Market Concentration (% of base year market controlled by top three 71% competitors) Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
57
Discussion The potential adoption of PACS solutions is 100.0 percent, which includes all hospitals and diagnostic centers in the country. It is important to remark that not every diagnostic center possesses image diagnostic services. As an example, biochemical laboratories are considered diagnostic centers. The average adoption is only 2.0 percent, meaning that 341 healthcare institutions have a PACS solution installed. This number can be divided between 250 hospitals and 91 diagnostic centers. The higher adoption is among large hospitals, where the penetration reaches 28 percent in both public and private hospitals. The smallest adoption of PACS solutions is among small public diagnostic centers, with a penetration of less than 1 percent. The penetration of this solution is far below other regions around the world. The installed base reaches almost 80.0 percent in Europe and in North America. The installed base will reach 1,452 in 2017, with a CAGR of 27 percent.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
58
200 20.0 150 15.0 100 50 0 2011 43 22 14 2012 60 28 18 34.2 2013 74 33 22.00 21.7 2014 91 41 27 23.3 Year 2015 113 51 33.00 23.9 2016 140 62 42 23.9 2017 171 77 53 23.4 10.0 5.0 0.0
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
Units
<NB06-48>
60
Revenue ($ Million)
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2011 1.16 1.48 2.30 2012 1.62 1.85 2.95 30.0 2013 1.99 2.22 3.63 22.1 2014 2.44 2.73 4.46 22.8 Year 2015 3.03 3.42 5.49 23.9 2016 3.73 4.14 6.86 23.4 2017 4.55 5.13 8.64 24.4
0.0
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
80%
Revenue (%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
Small Medium Big
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
62
The total PACS market revenue forecast by size of contract is expected to remain almost constant, with a CAGR from 2011 to 2017 of 24.7 percent for big contracts, 23.0 percent for medium contracts, and 25.7 percent for small contracts. Although verticalization of big hospitals would suggest an increase of big contracts, there are many small hospitals and diagnosis centers with low IT budgets that will digitalize their services and will need mini-PACS solutions. Although the average price is forecasted to decrease over the years, revenue will still grow faster than units because of the higher participation of big contracts.
<NB06-48>
63
80%
Revenue (%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
Diagnostic Centers Hospitals
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
64
<NB06-48>
65
Argentinean Market-PACS Market Revenue Per Region and Total Number of Exams Managed by PACS Solutions
PACS Market: Concentration of Total Installed Base Per Region, Argentina, 2011
Total Millons of exams managed by PACS solutions in 2011 The highest penetration rate is at Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires the capital city. It has 172 hospitals, of which 77 percent are private, and 1,494 diagnostic centers, of which 96 percent are private. Moreover, just 26 percent of the population do not have health insurance. 53.7
Hospitals 45.1
In 2011, we estimate that 50 million exams were managed by PACSs in Argentina. However, considering the increasing market penetration, this number could reach 700 million in 2017.
Sources: Brazilian Ministry of Health; Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
66
<NB06-48>
67
<NB06-48>
68
<NB06-48>
69
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
70
Fuji 18%
Carestrea m 26%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
71
IMDC 2%
Carestrea m 37%
AGFA 28%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
72
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. 73
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
74
<NB06-48>
75
Visualmedica
Company Information
Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio 1998 Argentina Argentina Details
Company History
Argentina
Visualmedica is a Argentinean company focused on PACS and RIS solutions. Visualmedica signed partnership with ICRco (USA) to commercialize products in the digital radiology area. This joint venture allows them to sell the digital radiology equipment with an IT solution included.
Recent M&A
Visualmedica leverages a very aggressive growth strategy in Argentina. It provides simple and low-cost solutions for every healthcare institution. Generally,Visuamedica offers the first IT-integrated solution to institutions that do not have digital systems.
<NB06-48>
76
NetMed Solutions
Company Information
Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio 2008 Argentina Argentina NetMed Solution is the Argentinean distributor of Pixeon. Their general manager has much experience in this field. They provide solutions for every segment. Details
Company History
Brazil
Recent M&A
They first installed PACS Aurora at Hospital Favaloro, and in 2012, they installed PACS in the San Camilo clinic that holds 120 beds .
<NB06-48>
77
IMDC
Company Information Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio n/a Uruguay Argentina, Uruguay Details IMDC is the Argentinean distributor of CharruaSoft. CharruaSoft is a DICOM and Imaging Uruguayan software company. They started developing DICOM applications in 1996. They worked together with ImageSystems from Germany in the creation of the DICOM viewer K-PACS/iQ-View and with Med-sX from France to implement a DICOM paper printing system PrintSCP. The company is continuously improving their product line and also develops custom software according to our customers needs. Company History
Uruguay
PACS, CharruaSoft
Recent M&A
IMDC offers a wide range of solutions, including paper print, full DICOM storage, and more. CharruaSoft has been awarded a loan by the Uruguayan Government agency for financing the FDA certification process of their main products: CharruaPACS and Charrua Workstation.
<NB06-48>
78
Brazil Breakdown
<NB06-48>
79
The international monetary fund ranked Brazil as the 6th biggest economy of the world, with a GPD of $2,492.90 billion and a population of 192.0 million.
Brazil is considered one of the leading emerging economies together with China, India, and Russia.
<NB06-48>
80
North 483 (8%) Northeast 1,750 28% Center-West 780 Southeast 12% 2,210 35% South 1,071 17%
Total: 6,294
The number of hospitals has been stable in the last five years, between 6,300 and 6,400. Both categories from Ministry of Health philanthropic (nonprofit institutions) and private hospitals are privately funded. In the South and Southeast, the two main regions in terms of GDP, philanthropic hospitals have a significant participation. In North and Northeast regions, public hospitals are the majority.
Sources: Brazilian Ministry of Health; Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
81
<NB06-48>
82
TREND
MEASUREMENT
Market Stage (Nascent, Growth, Mature) Market Revenue (2011) Penetration of PACS Solution (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Enterprise PACS (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Middle PACS (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Mini PACS (2011) Revenues at End of Forecast Period (2017) Base Year Revenue Growth Rate Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), 20112016 Customer Price Sensitivity (scale of 1 to 10, Low to High)
Market Concentration (% of base year market controlled by top three 51.8% competitors) Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
83
Discussion The potential adoption of PACS solutions is 100.0 percent, which includes all hospitals and diagnostic centers in the country. Nowadays, the average adoption is only 6.0 percent, meaning that 1,483 healthcare institutions have a PACS solution installed. This number can be divided between 537 hospitals and 946 diagnostic centers. The higher adoption is among large hospitals, where the penetration reaches 20.0 percent in both public and private hospitals. The smallest adoption of PACS solutions is among small public diagnostic centers, reaching a penetration of only 2.0 percent. The penetration of this solution is far below that of other regions around the world. The installed base reaches almost 80.0 percent in Europe and in North America. The installed base will reach 4,634 in 2017, with a CAGR from 2011 to 2017 of 20.9 percent.
<NB06-48>
84
Units
500 400 300 200 100 0 2011 44 92 58 2012 48 115 77 23.7 2013 50 144 103 23.8 2014 52.00 181.00 138.00 24.9 Year 2015 52 228 186 25.6 2016 47 288.00 252.00 26.0 2017 35 365 342 26.4
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
25.5
The sales of PACSs for hospitals represented only 32.0 percent of the total sales; however, the CAGR for this type of institution is 34.2 percent, in comparison with 27.4 percent of the units sold for diagnostic centers.
The integration of hospitals is boosting the acquisition of PACS solutions. Big hospitals are acquiring small and medium ones, creating big groups. PACS solutions are essential for the institutions to fully integrate with the other hospitals in the group.
The international events that Brazil will hostthe 2016 Olympic Games and the 2014 Football World Cupwill also be a great opportunity for the acquisitions of this solution, mainly for the public sector. This will enable huge public tenders in order to be prepared for these events.
<NB06-48>
86
32.0 31.0
Revenue ($ Million)
200 29.0 150 100 50 0 2011 3.53 23.28 33.02 2012 3.81 29.04 43.92 28.3 2013 4.03 36.34 58.63 29.0 2014 4.15 45.60 78.56 29.6 Year 2015 4.12 57.41 105.67 30.3 2016 3.74 72.52 142.76 31.0 2017 2.79 91.93 193.72 31.7 28.0 27.0 26.0
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
250
30.0
PACS Market Percent Revenue Forecast by Size of Contract, Brazil, 2011 and 2017
100% 80%
Revenue (%)
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
88
In 2011, the breakdown of the $59.8 million were as follows: o o 80.4 percent for the private sector and 19.6 percent for public sector; 55.2 percent for big contracts, 38.9 percent for medium contracts, and 5.9 percent for small contracts; 36.9 percent for hospitals and 63.1 percent for diagnostic centers.
Due to the integration trend, the large contracts are forecasted to increase more than the average, with a CAGR from 2011 to 2017 of 34.3 percent. Small contracts are forecasted to decrease its participation, and in 2017 will represent less than 5.0 percent of total revenue.
Although the average price is forecasted to decrease over the years, revenue will still grow more than units because of the higher participation of big contracts.
<NB06-48>
89
100%
80%
Revenue (%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
Diagnostic Centers Hospitals
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
90
The larger representation of diagnostic centers in the total revenue is basically due to the greater number of clinics in comparison with hospitals. There are more than 17,000 diagnostic centers in Brazil, while there are only 7,536 hospitals.
Even with the greater number of institutions, the installed base of PACS solutions in diagnostic centers is lower than in hospitals: 5.6 percent versus 7.1 percent.
It is valuable to mention that public diagnostic centers represent only 2.6 percent in the penetration of the solutions; the number of public clinics is not very representative either, at only 6.0 percent.
<NB06-48>
91
Brazilian PACS Market Revenue Per Region and Total Number of Exams Managed by PACS Solutions
PACS Market: Concentration of Total Installed Base Per Region, Brazil, 2011
North 30 (2%) Northeast 222 15% Center-West 267 Southeast 18% 564 38% South 400 27%
Hospitals 114,120.7
Total: 1,483
The Brazilian installed base is not divided equally among regions. The North represents only 2.0 percent , while the Southeast has the higher number of PACS solutions, representing 38.0 percent of the total.
In 2011, more than 300 million exams were managed by PACS solutions in the country. However, due to the small penetration of the solution , more than 2 billion exams were not managed by the solution.
Sources: Brazilian Ministry of Health; Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
92
<NB06-48>
93
<NB06-48>
94
Pixeon, 6.1%
Philips, 8.1%
Microdata, 6.0%
Carestream, 17.3%
GE, 7.9%
Fuji, 11.0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. 95
<NB06-48>
Philips, 7.8%
<NB06-48>
96
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. 97
Mini-PACS contracts
Others, 14.0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
98
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
99
<NB06-48>
100
Medical Systems
Company Information Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio 1990 Brazil Brazil, Argentina Medical Systems is a Brazilian company focused on PACS and RIS solutions. The company has been developing software since 1990 and has 6 products in its portfolio. Medical Systems is included on the cartao BNDES program, which enables the company to offer better financing conditions to its clients. Details Company History
Brazil
Recent M&A
Medical System is always looking for partnerships as the main part of its strategy. In 2010, Medical System signed a partnership with Pixeon in order to integrate its solutions. Medical systems provides the RIS solution and Pixeon the PACS solution. The company is now working on prototypes for this integrated system. The company is expanding in Latin America and is already negotiating contracts in Mexico; in addition, it has two clients in Argentina.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Microdata
Company Information Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio 1999 Brazil Brazil Details Company History The acquisition of Microdata by MV Sistemas is an important strategic step in Microdatas product portfolio, which can take advantage of the leading market position that MV has over the other healthcare IT segment in Brazilthe hospital information system (HIS) market in Brazil. In addition to the strong brand of MV Sistemas, Microdata can also associate its products with Vivos name, a company acquired by the multinational Telefonica, which formed the partnership in the beginning of 2012. Microdata can take advantage of the distribution and sales channel of Telefonica around the globe in order to expand its product penetration.
Brazil
RIS/PACS
Recent M&A
Microdata developed and launched a unique PACS software in 2011 in partnership with Amil, an important network of hospitals and health insurers in Brazil. The software stores and distributes radiological images with an application, and when in connectivity with Microsoft Kinect, which is a technology developed by Microsoft to use in the Xbox 360, allows the participants to interact with the game without needing a joystick in the hands.
<NB06-48>
102
Pixeon
Company Information Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio 2003 Brazil Plans to expand to LATAM Details Pixeon is the first Brazilian company to develop equipment completely locally in the IT segment. It is one of the most important companies in the sector. The main product of Pixeon is PACS Aurora. In April 2010, Pixeon signed a partnership with Shimadzu (Japan) to commercialize products in the digital radiology area. This joint venture allows them to sell the digital radiology equipment with an IT solution included. The main target of this alliance is public and private hospitals looking for a complete solution. Company History
PACS, teleradiology
Recent M&A
Intel
Pixeons office is located in Santa, Catarina but the company is building its headquarters in So Paulo. Pixeon expanded its business to Latin America in order to become the leading suppliers in the region. In November of 2010, the company opened its first office in Buenos Aires. With the new office in So Paulo and the expansion to other countries in Latin America, the company is expecting to grow at rate of 35.0 percent annually. The company had revenues for $2.0 million in 2010. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48> Go back to Company Profile Index
103
Mexico Breakdown
<NB06-48>
104
Market Overview
Economic Background
The international monetary fund ranked Mexico as the 14th largest economy of the world with a GDP of $1,154.784 billion and a population of 110 million. Mexico has several commercial agreements with other countries and it is positioned well geographically near the U.S. and Canada. It is also part of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). The Mexican FDA ,COFERIS, signed a commercial agreement with Japan to facilitate the importation of some Japanese medical devices
<NB06-48>
105
Beds/1,000 inhabitants
8.33
9.4
1499
3. West Region: Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima, Michoacn 4. North Central Region: Aguas Calientes, Zacatecas, San Luis Potos, Guanajuato, Queretaro 5. South Central Region: Estado de Mexico, Distrito Federal, Morelos 6. South Western Region: Chiapas, Oaxaca, Guerrero
12.0
2543 2084
8.25 7
11.2
23.0
2,200
0.92
10.7
4,298
4.67
7. South Eastern Region: Yucatn, Quintana Roo, Campeche, Tabasco 8. East Region: Veracruz, Puebla, Hidalgo, Tlaxcala
5.6
1,414
4.67
14.0
3,816
6.75
All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: INEGI and Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
106
Out-of-pocket payments
The main objective of the government is to provide universal coverage by 2012 to 2013
<NB06-48>
107
<NB06-48>
108
<NB06-48>
109
TREND
MEASUREMENT
Market Stage (Nascent, Growth, Mature) Market Revenue (2011) Penetration of PACS Solution (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Enterprise PACS (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Middle PACS (2011) Average Price Per Unit: Mini PACS (2011) Revenues at End of Forecast Period (2017) Base Year Revenue Growth Rate Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), 20112017 Customer Price Sensitivity (scale of 1 to 10, Low to High)
Market Concentration (% of base year market controlled by top three 55.5% Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2010. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. competitors)
<NB06-48>
110
Discussion The potential adoption of PACS solution is 100.0 percent, which includes all hospitals and diagnostic centers in the country. Nowadays, the average adoption is only 8 percent, meaning that 1,860 healthcare institutions have a PACS solution installed. This number can be divided between 840 hospitals and 1,020 diagnostic centers. The higher adoption of PACS is large private hospitals where the penetration reaches 12 percent. The smallest adoption of PACS solution is among small public diagnostic centers, reaching a penetration of only 2 percent. The penetration of this solution is far lower than other regions around the world. The installed base reaches almost 80.0 percent in Europe and in North America. The installed base will reach 7075 in 2017 with a CAGR from 2011 to 2017 of 25 percent.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
111
Units
1,000 800 15.0 600 400 200 0 2011 166 132 63 2012 197 162 81 21.9 2013 241 198.00 103.00 23.2 2014 297 244 134 24.5 Year 2015 385 300.00 172.00 27.0 2016 502 372 223 28.0 2017 668 461 290 29.4 10.0 5.0 0.0
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
The sales of PACS for hospitals represented 41 percent of the total sales. However, the CAGR for this type of institution is 27.5 percent, in comparison with 49 percent for the units sold for diagnostic centers.
The integration of hospitals is boosting the acquisition of PACS solutions. Big hospitals are acquiring small and medium ones, creating big groups. PACS solutions are essential in order for institutions to fully integrate with the other hospitals of the group.
It is important to notice that between 2009 and 2012, the Mexican government invested more than 3 billion US dollars in healthcare programs and impact the Mexican PACS market in 2011.
<NB06-48>
113
70 60
Revenue ($ Million)
40 30 20 10 0 2011 3.91 6.07 6.36 2012 4.63 7.43 8.14 23.60% 2013 5.66 9.10 10.42 24.62% 2014 6.98 11.21 13.44 25.64% Year 2015 9.02 13.76 17.26 26.66% 2016 11.76 17.01 22.36 27.67% 2017 15.65 21.09 29.07 28.69%
0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
50
PACS Market Percent Revenue Forecast By Size of Contract, Mexico, 2011 and 2017
100% 80%
% Revenue
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
115
In 2011, the breakdown of the $16.33 million were as follows: o 18 percent for the private sector and 72 percent for public sector; o 39 percent for big contracts, 37 percent for medium contracts, and 24 percent for small contracts. o 41 percent for hospitals and 49 percent for diagnostic centers.
Due to the integration trend, big contracts are forecasted to grow more than the average, with a CAGR from 2011 to 2017 of 29 percent. Medium and small contracts are forecasted to decrease its participation, and in 2017 will represent 32 and 24 percent of total revenues.
<NB06-48>
116
100%
80%
% Revenue
60%
40%
20%
0%
Diagnostic Centers Hospitals
Year
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
117
Even with the higher number of Institutions, the installed base of PACS solutions in diagnostic centers is lower than in hospitals: 6 percent versus 16 percent.
In public diagnostic centers, the penetration of the PACS was 3 percent in 2011, with 27 installed PACS. It is important to highlight that the 1,020 public clinics are not so representative, accounting for only 6.0 percent of the total Mexican diagnostic centers.
<NB06-48>
118
<NB06-48>
119
Competitive Environment
PACS Market: Competitive Structure,
Mexico, 2011
Number of Companies in the Market Competitive Factors Key End-user Groups Major Market Participants Market Share of Top 5 Competitors Other Notable Market Participants Notable Acquisitions and Mergers 9 with revenues greater than $16.33 million Installation, service maintenance, integration, price, technology, Hospitals and Diagnostic Centers AGFA, Carestream, Fuji, Philips, Siemens 67.9% EyMSA, SMH, TeleRadiologia
<NB06-48>
120
Fuji, 8.0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
121
<NB06-48>
122
Philips, 18.0% SMH, 4.0% Fuji, 5.0% EYMSA, 4.0% GE, 13.0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis. 123
<NB06-48>
Carestrea m, 20.0%
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
124
Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2011. Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
<NB06-48>
125
<NB06-48>
126
SMH
Suministros Para Uso Medico y Hospitalario, SA de CV
Company Information
Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio Recent M&A n/a Mexico Mexico China, Germany PACS, RIS, HIS Details A Mexican distributor of medical equipment, SMH sells low- and midtech systems to small and mediumsized hospitals, clinics, and freestanding imaging centers. Until recently, it imported EBM PACSs from China, but now also handles the German IQ Systems brand to cover its IMSS sales, because the Institute restricts its purchases to items from countries with whom Mexico has a free-trade agreement.
Company History
<NB06-48>
127
Company History
Details 1979 Mexico Mexico n/a Diagnostic imaging equipment, RIS, PACS A Mexican manufacturer and distributor of electronic components for medical equipment, EYMSA also offers technical support for imaging and other medical equipment. In operation since 1979, it gained a reputation in the early years for maintaining and repairing imported medical equipment when the severe import restrictions of the day hampered the acquisition of spare parts.
<NB06-48>
128
TeleRadiologia Medica
Company Information
Parameter Founded in Country of Origin Geographic Presence Production Site (PACS) Healthcare Portfolio Recent M&A n/a Mexico Mexico Canada Diagnostic imaging Equipment, RIS, PACS Teleradiologia Medica is the Mexican distributor of RamSoft. Details
Company History
RamSoft is a Canadian leading IT software and services company, dedicated to developing and delivering innovative medical imaging, radiology workflow, teleradiology and billing solutions for the Radiology market.
<NB06-48>
129
<NB06-48>
130
PACSs will become crucial software through which to integrate healthcare platforms.
<NB06-48>
131
Legal Disclaimer
Frost & Sullivan takes no responsibility for any incorrect information supplied to us by manufacturers or users. Quantitative market information is based primarily on interviews and therefore is subject to fluctuation. Frost & Sullivan research services are limited publications containing valuable market information provided to a select group of customers. Our customers acknowledge, when ordering or downloading, that Frost & Sullivan research services are for customers internal use and not for general publication or disclosure to third parties. No part of this research service may be given, lent, resold or disclosed to noncustomers without written permission. Furthermore, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of the publisher. For information regarding permission, write to: Frost & Sullivan 331 E. Evelyn Ave. Suite 100 Mountain View, CA 94041
<NB06-48>
132
One of Frost & Sullivans core deliverables is its Market Engineering studies. They are based on our proprietary Market Engineering Methodology. This approach, developed across the 50 years of experience assessing global markets, applies engineering rigor to the often nebulous art of market forecasting and interpretation. A detailed description of the methodology can be found here.
<NB06-48>
133