Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: ROSALIA - CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE


OF P OVERTY BEFORE AND NOW/ AFTER STUDY CIRCLES FROM
P OSTSURVEYS 2.09

4.0

Rosalia
3.5
3.37
3 . 11 3 . 19 3 . 19 3.08
3.0
2.89 2.92 2.96
2.5
2.36 2.32 2.32
2.21
2.0 2.08
1. 8 0 B EFOR E a v e r1.a9ge
2 r a t i ng 1. 8 8
1. 5

1. 0 N OW/ A FT ER a v e r a g e
0.5
r a t i ng

0.0

P ossi bl e D i f f er ent R easons i t i s H ow pover t y St r a t e g i e s t o I ndi vi dual C o mmu n i t y P ol i ci es t hat


causes of ki nds of di f f i cul t t o a f f e c t s my r educe act i ons t o act i ons t o woul d r educe
pover t y pover t y get out of c o mmu n i t y pover t y r educe r educe pover t y
pover t y pover t y pover t y

Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: ROSALIA


STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09 Community Progress:
100.0%

90.0%
89.7%
Study Circles and
Leadershipplenty®
80.0%

70.0% 58.6% 62.1%


55.2%
60.0%

Survey Results
44.8%
50.0%
40.0%

30.0%
20.0%

10.0%

0.0%
I ncr eased A l r eady t aken V er y l ikel y in V er y l ikel y in V er y li kely i n
knowl edge of act i on f ut ur e t o t ake f ut ur e t o j oi n f ut ur e t o suppor t
pover t y i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n pol i ci es t o
r educe pover t y

Study Circles
63 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
69 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data: R O S A LIA C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S : Rosalia BEFORE
B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S E LF R A T IN G S LE A D E R S H IP S KILLS F R O M
H OR I Z ON S C OM M U N I T Y: R OS A LI A LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9 Rosalia AFTER
P OVER T Y R A T ES C OM P A R I S ON C EN S U S WI TH S T U D Y C I R C LE A D U L T
P A R T I C I P A N TS
All Washington BEFORE
5.0 All Washington AFTER
35.5%
40.0% 4.5 4.59 4.53 4.53
4.35 4.29
4 4.41 4.28 4.12
35.0%
4
4.13 4.10 4.09 4.29
22.6% 4.06 4.18 4.12 4.12
30.0%
4.0 4.05
25.0%
3.94 3.82 4.02 3.94 3.82 3.80 3.95 3.75
12 . 8 % 3.73 3.81 3.72 3.74
20.0%
9.7% 3.5
3.73 3.61 3.69
15 . 0 %

10 . 0 %
3
3.12 3.06 3.06 3.18 3.18
3.0
5.0%
2.82 2.94 2.88 2.82
0.0% 2
2.72 2.62 2.71 2.65 2.45 2.48 2.68
2.58 2.57 2.59 2.39
C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G 2.5 2.47 2.47
2.35 2.33 2.41 2.35 2.35
2.23 2.29
2.0 2.23 2.13
2.11
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: ROSALIA 1.5
AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY
P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09 1.0
I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I k now how t o I now how t o I know t he
r ecogni ze wor k wi t h t he i dent i f y t he l ead manage pl an and ass es s t he v al ue of

Census 5 6 .2 l eader shi p l eader s hi p i n s t ages of pr oduc t i ve c onf l i c t i n i mpl ement val ue of br i ngi ng

60 s ki l l s i n my gr oup meet i ngs. gr oup wor k . c ommuni t y gr oup c i t i zens

LP Participants ot her s or gani zat i on devel opment . change pr obl em- t oget her t o
and/ or pr oj ec t s. s ol v i ng t al k about
50 gr eat er ef f or t s. i ss ues.
c ommuni t y .
3 2 .1
40 Scale of 1=St rongly Disagr ee t o 5 =St r ongly Agree

30

20 11.7 R O S A LIA
L C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S : WA Y S
P R OG R A M H A S H E LP E D T O A D D R E S S / C H A N G E P OV E R T Y IN Rosalia
C O M M UN IT Y F R O M LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9
10 8 .8 % 6 7 .6 % 2 3 .5 %

0
All Washington Horizons
Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over  communities

HOR IZ O N S C O M M U N IT Y : R OSA LIA 53 .8 %


M or e pe opll e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y i n
PR IO R EX PER IEN C E A N D C OM M U N I T Y R O LES OF LEA D ER SHI PPLEN T Y t he c ommuni t y 76 .5%
PA R T I C I PA N T S 4 . 0 9
We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd wha t 6 6 .8 %
4 4 .1% t o do a bout i t 6 4 .7%
45. 0% 4 1. 2 %
4 4 .2 %
40. 0% M or e pe opl e a r e st e ppi ng up t o
35. 0% a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y 6 4 .7%
2 9 .4 %
30. 0%
25. 0% M or e l ow i nc
n ome pe opl e a r e i nv ol v e d 3 3 .6 %
i n t he c ommuni t y 3 5.3 %
20. 0% 14 . 7%
15. 0% 8 .8 % 4 0 .9 %
10. 0% We a r e worr k i ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s i n
5. 0%
2 .9 % publ i c pol i c y 52 .9 %
0. 0%
E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r e a l l y N or or ever M or e pe o pl e ar e ge t t i ng he l p t o ge t 2 5.6 %
3 5.3 %
i nvol ved ma k e s not a or di nar y par t of t he an el ected out of pov e r t y
l eader shi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al
p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r We a r e t a ki ng c oncr e t e s t e ps t o
2 3 .6 %
a ddr e s s pov e r t y 2 3 .5%

0.0% 10 . 0 % 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%