Anda di halaman 1dari 3

8/6/13

WHO negotiators propose putting off R&D treaty discussions until 2016 | Knowledge Ecology International
DonatemoneytoKEI Listserves MainAreasofWork Videos Events Publications Blogs AboutKEI
Search

Knowledge Ecology International

Attendingandmendingtheknowledgeecosystem
Navigation

HomeBlogsJamesLove'sblog

SiteMap Recentposts Feedaggregator Polls Groups

WHO negotiators propose putting off R&D treaty discussions until 2016

View

Whatlinkshere

SubmittedbyJamesLoveon28.November201220:22

RoundIIoftheParisAccord tookplaceinParisonOctober 23and24,2009.

Around2amtheopenendedconsultationsontheCEWGrecommendationsfinishedtheirworkonareportandproposed resolution,whichisattachedbelow.[Seealsointerviewsduringthenegotiationshere: http://www.youtube.com/user/KEIWashDC/videos.] Intheafternoonofthethirdday,WHODirectorGeneralMargaretChansteppedinandtookchargeofthenegotiations, insistingthenegotiatorsarriveataconsensustext,whichemergedlongaftertranslationwasavailableandaftermany negotiatorshadlefttheroom.Thefinaltextis4pageslongwithnosubstantivebrackets.Thelastrecommendationofthe reportwasasfollows: TheopenendedmeetingofMemberStatesstronglyrecommendsthattheEBconsidersthisreportandits attachedresolutionwithaviewtorecommendingtheadoptionoftheresolutionbytheWHAwithoutre openingit. ThethreepageresolutionthatwasattachedtothereportrequirestheDirectorGeneral: todevelopnormsandstandardsforclassificationofhealthR&D toestablishaGlobalHealthR&DObservatorywithinWHOsSecretariat todevelopaproposalforeffectivemechanisms,includingpoolingresourcesandvoluntarycontributions,aswellas aplantoindependentlymonitortheireffectiveness theimplementationofafewhealthR&Ddemonstrationprojectstoaddressidentifiedgapswhichdisproportionately affectdevelopingcountries,particularlythepoorandforwhichimmediateactioncanbetaken Tomakeanumberofreportsoncoordinationandfundingmechanismsanddemonstrationprojectsin2014and2015 toconveneanotherOpenendedmeetingofMemberStatespriortothe69thWHAinMay2016,toassessprogress andcontinuediscussionsontheremainingissuesinrelationtomonitoring,coordinationandfinancingforhealth R&Dtakingintoaccountallrelevantanalysesandreports,includingtheanalysisoftheCEWGReportconsensus Anumberofnegotiatorsfromdevelopingcountriespressedforamuchmoreambitiousoutcome,buildinguponthebold reportoftheWHOConsultativeExpertWorkingGrouponR&DFinancing,buttheUnitedStatesandtheEuropeanUnion, bothdealingwithlargefinancialcrises,weredeadsetagainstanyactionoftheR&DTreatyproposaluntil2016.Unless WHOmemberstatesarewillingtoopentheresolutiontoamendment,attentionwillnowshiftthethecreationoftheR&D observatoryandthe"demonstrationprojects,"andevaluatingnewstrategiestopersuadetheUnitedStatesandthe EuropeanUnionthatinvestmentsinmedicalresearchanddevelopmentareinadequate,andthatthecurrentsystemhas flaws,includingbutnotlimitedtothoseassociatedwithhighpricesforproducts,inadequateR&Dfordiseasesthat predominatelyconcernpoorpersonslivingindevelopingcountries,underfundingofotherpriorityhealthR&Dneeds,and welldocumented(butnotreferenced)inefficienciesandmarketfailures. TheCEWGreportproposedthecreationofanewbindingagreementtoprovidebillionsofdollarsannuallyforR&Dto addressthespecialhealthcareneedsofpoorpersonslivingindevelopingcountries,andtointroducenewapproachesto fundingR&Dthatincludedopeninnovationmodels,thedelinkageofR&Dcostsfromproductpricesandtechnology transferandcapacitybuildingindevelopingcountries. Whatemergedfromthenegotiationwasamuchweakerwatereddownresolutionthatbasicallycalledforthecreationofthe R&DObservatory,mentionedsomegoodprinciplesandvalueswithoutopenlyacknowledgedthefailuresofthecurrent system,andputoffdiscussionsoftheCEWGmoretransformativereformsuntil2016. Theissueofdelinkagewasmentioned,butonlythepreambleofthedocumentandonlyinconnectionwithincentives,and nototherfundingmechanismssuchasgrantsorother"push"funding. KEIStatement ThereportandproposedresolutionareahugedisappointmentforKEIandotherswhoexpectedtheWHOtobeginworkon aninternationalagreementtoprovidesustainablefundingformedicalR&Dinareasofpriority,andtoimplementdelinkage andopeninnovationmodels.KEIrecognizesthatthisisadifficulttimetocreatenewfinancialobligationstofundR&D.But itisappallingthatthenegotiatorssettledonathreeandhalfyeardelayinthediscussions.IftheUSandtheEUdon'tthink medicalR&Disthatimportant,theyshouldstopmakingdemandsintradeagreementsforexpandedintellectualproperty protectionforpharmaceuticaldrugs. TheObamaAdministrationhasresistedtheR&DtreatyandmoregeneralreformsofmedicalR&Dfinancingforthepast fouryears,andnowhasblockedthetreatyuntiltheendofhissecondterminoffice,leavingtheissueoffundingforglobal healthprioritiestothenextPresident.AtreatyonR&DfinancingwouldhavenothavecosttheUnitedStatesanymoney,

Book navigation

CopyrightandRelated Rights AboutKEI AccesstoMedical Technologies CompetitionPolicy Databases EconomicsofCreativity andKnowledge Enforcementand RemediestoInfringement Events GeneralAccessto KnowledgeIssues GovernmentFunded Inventions KnowledgeGovernance Fora Medicaldiseases, conditionsand technologies NuclearProliferation PatentPolicy Prizestostimulate innovation Publicationsand ResearchNotes Timelines Transparency

User login

Username:*

Password:*

Log in

LoginusingOpenID

keionline.org/node/1612

1/3

8/6/13
Requestnewpassword

WHO negotiators propose putting off R&D treaty discussions until 2016 | Knowledge Ecology International
whilecreatingobligationsonothercountriestopaymoreforglobalhealthR&Dprojects.Theonlyreasonforblockingthis initiativetowastoprotecttheexistingdrugdevelopmentbusinessmodel.Theexistingmodelbenefitsbigpharmathe most,andexploitsconsumersandmarginalizesthepoor. Selectedelementsofthepreamble,fromtheproposedresolution PP5AcknowledgingtheneedforimprovingmonitoringofhealthR&Dresourceflows,andidentificationof gapsinhealthR&D,bettercoordinationofhealthR&Dandprioritysettingbasedonthepublichealth needsofdevelopingcountriesconsensus PP6Acknowledgingalsothattheprovisionofadditionalinformationondiseaseburden,research opportunities,thepotentialhealthimpact,andestimationsoftheresourcesneededtodevelopnewhealth productsandmakethemaccessibletothepoorindevelopingcountriescanprovideanimportantbasisfor advocacyforadditionalfinancingconsensus PP7RecognizingtheimportanceofsecuringsustainablefinancingmechanismsforhealthR&Dto developanddeliverhealthproducts1toaddressthehealthneedsofdevelopingcountriesconsensus PP8RecallingtheGlobalstrategyandplanofactionwhichreferstoarangeofincentiveschemesfor healthR&DwithoneobjectivebeingthedelinkageofthecostsofR&Dfromthepriceofhealthproducts consensus PP9Recognizingtheinterlinkageofmonitoring,coordinationandfinancingofhealthR&Daswellasthe importanceofpredictabilityandsustainabilityofresourcesrequiredtoenhancehealthR&Dconsensus PP10Reaffirmingtheimportanceoffacilitationoftechnologytransferonmutuallyagreedtermsbetween developedanddevelopingcountriesaswellasamongdevelopingcountriesasappropriateconsensus PP11UnderscoringthathealthR&Dshouldbeneedsdrivenandevidencebased,andbeguidedbythe followingcoreprinciples:affordability,effectiveness,efficiency,equity,anditshouldbeconsideredasa sharedresponsibilityconsensus PP12Realizingtheneedforimprovingprioritysettingandtransparentdecisionmakingprocessesbased onthepublichealthneedsofdevelopingcountriesconsensus PP13Notingtheimportantroleofthepublicandprivatesectorsinpromotinginnovationanddeveloping newhealthproductsconsensus OP1Endorsesthefollowingstrategicworkplantoimprovemonitoring,coordinationandensure sustainablefundingforhealthR&D,inlinewiththeGSPA,asasteptoachievethegoalofdevelopment anddeliveryofaffordable,effective,safeandqualityhealthproductsinwhichexistingmarket mechanismsfailtoprovideincentivesforhealthR&Dalsoagreestofurtherdevelopthestrategicwork planthroughbroadengagementofpublicandprivateentities,academiaandcivilsocietyconsensus FromtheoperationalsectionsfortheDirectorGeneral: OP4REQUESTStheDirectorGeneral:consensus OP4.1todevelopnormsandstandardsforclassificationofhealthR&D,buildingonexistingsources,in consultationwithMemberStatesandrelevantstakeholders,inordertosystematicallycollectandcollate informationconsensus OP4.2tosupportMemberStatesintheirendeavortoestablishorstrengthenhealthR&Dcapacitiesand monitorrelevantinformationonhealthR&Dconsensus OP4.3toestablishaGlobalHealthR&DObservatorywithinWHOsSecretariattomonitorandanalyse relevantinformationonhealthR&D,buildingonnationalandregionalobservatories(orequivalent functions)andexistingdatacollectionmechanismswithaviewtocontributingtotheidentificationofgaps andopportunitiesforhealthR&DanddefiningprioritiesinconsultationwithMemberStates,aswellas,in collaborationwithotherrelevantstakeholders,asappropriate,inordertosupportcoordinatedactions consensus OP4.4Tofacilitatethroughregionalconsultationsandbroadengagementofrelevantstakeholdersthe implementationofafewhealthR&Ddemonstrationprojectstoaddressidentifiedgapswhich disproportionatelyaffectdevelopingcountries,particularlythepoorandforwhichimmediateactioncanbe takenconsensus OP4.5Toreviewexistingmechanismstoassesstheirsuitabilitytoperformthecoordinationfunctionof healthR&Dconsensus OP4.6toexploreandevaluateexistingmechanismsforcontributionstohealthR&D,andifthereisno suitablemechanism,todevelopaproposalforeffectivemechanisms,includingpoolingresourcesand voluntarycontributions,aswellasaplantoindependentlymonitortheireffectivenessconsensus OP4.7toconveneanotherOpenendedmeetingofMemberStates1priortothe69thWHAinMay2016,to assessprogressandcontinuediscussionsontheremainingissuesinrelationtomonitoring,coordination andfinancingforhealthR&Dtakingintoaccountallrelevantanalysesandreports,includingtheanalysis oftheCEWGReportconsensus OP4.8toreportonthereviewofexistingcoordinationmechanisms(OP4.5),aswellasontheevaluation ofexistingmechanismsforcontributionstohealthR&D(OP4.6)tothesixtyseventhWorldHealth

keionline.org/node/1612

2/3

8/6/13

WHO negotiators propose putting off R&D treaty discussions until 2016 | Knowledge Ecology International
Assembly,throughtheExecutiveBoardatits[]sessionandtoreportontheimplementationofhealth R&Ddemonstrationprojects(OP4.4)tothesixtyeightWorldHealthAssembly,throughtheExecutive Boardatits[]session,andtransmitthereportoftheopenendedMemberStatesmeetingtothesixty ninthWHA.consensus ===

Attachment

Size

CEWG_follow_up_meeting_final_report_20121129_2am_.pdf 156.79KB
JamesLove'sblog Addnewcomment Printerfriendlyversion Sendbyemail

SupportKEI
WASHINGTON1621ConnecticutAve.NW,Suite500,Washington,DC20009/TEL:+1.202.332.2670FAX+1.202.332.2673GENEVE1RoutedesMorillons,CP2100,1211Genve2,SwitzerlandTEL:+41.22.791.6727

THEMEDESIGNCopyright2009underGPLbyTributeMedia.SitePoweredbyDrupal.

keionline.org/node/1612

3/3

Anda mungkin juga menyukai