ANTI DALITH POLITICAL GULAM Dr C.

SOMSHEKAR MADE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO ENCOURAGE TRESSPASS OVER DALITH TENANTS LAND

STORY BEHIND THIS

REPECTED SIR, SUBJECT:- COMPLAINT AGAINST LOCAL REVENUE OFFICIALS, SEVERAL POLICE OFFICIALS OF KARNATAKA STATE, FOR FAILURE TO TAKE ACTION, LOCAL LAND MAFIA ELEMENTS, WHO ARE INDULGED IN DOING ATROCITY ACTS AGAINST US TO DEPRIVE OUR POSSESSION OF LAND IN SY.NO.13 OF KYATHSANDRA VILLAGE, OORDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK. BRIEF HISTORICAL FACTS OF OUR CASE:- We the undersigned are the tenants in Sy.no. 13 of Kyathsandra Grama, Oordigere Hobli, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District. We are in possession from time immemorial and paying rent to the persons as directed by Shri Gopalakrishnaswamy temple management. We are from Schedule Tribe community by caste Nayaka community. One upper caste Hanumantharayappa was a Melavadhya servant of temple. The rent was paid by us to Hanumantharayappa until Inam abolition laws were enforced and later it was stopped. Later Mr Hanumantharayappa got Tasthik amount as salary for his services from government. One K.N. Rajanna was a former lawyer for Mr Hanumantharayappa, such lawyer fought for the same survey number land in civil courts. That lawyer later became the member of land tribunal Tumkur. On his influence and on his own hand writing a one page order WITH 16 LINES is promulgated on 06-011982 in INA ULRM 150/150A/1979-80, by the land tribunal behind the back of us. To prove possession of us there is certified copy of spot mahazar from Revenue officials, house of ours existing in that sy.no.13 property, RTC extracts showing name of our ancestors in 1968 to 1972-73, and there is open eye visible tampering of revenue record from the 1970-71 to 1972-73 from Hanumaiah (ancestor of us) to Hanumantharayappa (client of Mr K.N. Rajanna). The tampering is the starting point of atrocity committed on us by collusion of local revenue officials and local land maphia politicians. The INA ULRM 150/150A/1979-80 order is stayed by Honble High court of Karnataka in WP 5168/1982 Dated 08-02-1982, and later such order is quashed as illegal and remanded back to Deputy Commissioner Tumkur, to consider all applications. The same tribunal order is also stayed in another WP 15303/1985 by Honble High Court Of Karnataka. Later many disputes were raised against us by Mr Hanumantharayappa in OS 145/1984 (which abated and closed with no fruits). During 1983-84 with fabricated MR No. 13/1981-82 the name of Gopalakrishnadevaru has been changed to Hanumantharayappa, in ownership column no.9 of RTC. Despite the knowledge of High Court stay, this is clear fabrication of record with an intention to perpetrating atrocity against the scheduled tribe tenant in possession of land.

Later Many acts of atrocity in collusion with officials of local revenue department ensued, just to deprive our possession of land and to encourage land mafia elements behind this. Those acts are:1. We were subjected to section 145 crpc proceedings prohibiting from entering our home itself in MAG CR 147/2002-03 by Local Sub-inspector, taluk magistrate (who belong to upper caste with all caste prejudice and encouragers of land mafia elements) order dated 18-08-2002. That order was quashed by High Court of Karnataka in CRP no. 2646/2004 dated 15-07-2005. 2. Taking advantage of revenue record entries the opponents LRs of Hanumantharayappa made sale agreement rewgarding sy.no.13, with land mafia elements B.R. Kumar s/o Shivanna and R. Basavaraju s/o Shivanna. Based on such agreement revenue entries were made by revenue officials. Based on such illegal agreements Deputy Commissioner fabricated his own order and impleaded them in inam proceedings. 3. Based on such above agreement our physical abuse and verbal abuse started from 2003 to till date there are many occasions wherein we were subjected to harassment by local officials and local goonda elements through one way or other based on caste prejudices, and to deprive our actual possession from the land. 4. One Ramakrishnaiah a case worker belonging to Brahmin community is tampering all the records in DC court proceedings in INA 9/98-99 the proceedings is prima facie tampered on many occasions. Despite complaint to Deputy Commissioner no action is taken because the land mafia elements belong to major Lingayath community. Which is having high political influence here. 5. A spot mahazar copy conducted by present DC is being misplaced by Ramakrishnaiah along with many old records which are favouring us. 6. When we were abused with filthy languages and sudden criminal trespass by erecting temporary shed in the sy.no. 13 land by Hanumatharayappas LRs on 18-05-2010 we have given complaint to local police, local police without registering FIR filed CMIS case and given endorsement thereby encouraging criminals to continue their atrocity against us. ( we have video and photos to prove their trespass). 7. Since the police behaved as ignorants of law we have given complaint to all higher police officials including upto Secretary of Home affairs Government of Karnataka. It seems government has adopted unconstitutional policy to help encourage land grabbers, land mafia elements, upper caste atrocitys, and official record fabricators. In Tumkur there is no opposition political leader to come to the help of us, all local political stalwarts have colluded together saving their own interests. 8. It is strange to see that a politician belonging to Schedule Tribe community targeting their own people and encouraging land acquisition against them. Example:- A land belonging to only Schedule tribe (Ajjagonahalli Grama) is selected for waste disposal of municipality. A local BJP MLA colludes with congress local leaders using local SC/ST community youngsters for all vice things. He encouraged land mafia against several people in Tumkur Just because they refused to sell their land. A local Congress former MLA is also indulged in land mafia activities, has indulged in atrocity against Schedule Tribe lecturer and making all efforts with his BJP MLA friend to close the case. All these stories we heard from our advocate. ONLY THROUGH YOUR KIND HEART YOU CAN SAVE OUR TUMKUR. 9. Despite bringing to the knowledge of The deputy commissioner, The superintendant of police, State police chiefs, Secretary to Home affairs, no one is ready to hear our grievance, everyone is misleading us. The case of us is very simple. We are claiming our rights as tenants, opponents are claiming rights based on their services to the temple. There is no previous grant of land based on service inam. The authorities without understanding basic things are encouraging land mafia elements. Since the land stood in the name of temple diety Gopalakrishnadevaru the land is not service inam land, it is religious and charitable inam land. 10. Here in case of ours previously from the starting year of RTC that is from 1968 to 1973 One Narasappa and Thimmaiah both ancesters of us are doing VARASAGU (TENANTS) IN INAM LAND. Subsequently among us Puttammas husband name entered in RTC that is HANUMANTHIAH Name. The said name is tampered by vested interests which is visible to open eyes to the name of Hanumantharayappa. Subsequently by colluding with revenue officials and without any order from either ANY COURT Hanumatharayappa and his wifes name is entered in RTC. Which is against the laid down law and made with pure intention to harass Schedule Tribe possessors. Moreover we have also files OS 742/2007 against Hanumatharayappas LRs and impleaded land mafia elements B.R. Kumar s/o Shivanna and R. Basavaraju s/o Shivanna, as parties and also impleaded Sub-Inspector of Police Kyathsandra and Taluk Magistrate as parties. The Honble Principal civil court of Tumkur was pleased to order Exparte Temporary Injunction order restraining defendants therein from interfering with the possession of the suit schedule property on 24-07-2008, with reasoned order. On 27-09-2008 the same Honble court was pleased to order to both parties to maintain status quo regarding suit schedule property which existed as on the date of filing of suit when D1 to D6 advocate opposed extension of T.I. order. On 05-01-2009 the Honble court was pleased to pass orders extending status quo orders until further orders. Inspite of existence of civil court stay orders, the local politicians along with Sub-Inspector of police colluded together and extended atrocity acts against us. We are even

abused with filthy language against our caste by Sub-Inspector of Police Kyathsandra. We are helpless persons after all these repeated atrocities approaching your Honble authority to seek justice in stopping further atrocity and to have detail enquiry regarding the atrocities committed against us and to book appropriate case against all those involved in it. WHAT THE LAW SAYS REGARDING TENANCY, POSSESSION, & INAM:The Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, came into force on 2-10-1965. The object of the said Act, inter alia, is to terminate the relationship of landlord and tenant and to confer ownership rights on the tenants. Landlords are prohibited from evicting their tenants. Section 25 provides for surrender of lands held by a tenant. In Thunga Bai And Ors. vs Vishalakshi Heggadthi And Anr ILR 1975 KAR 739 it is observed that: By Section 25 a bar was imposed against surrender of any land held by a tenant without the previous permission in writing of the 'court'. The Court can grant permission after making enquiry if it is satisfied that the proposed surrender is bona fide and the land surrendered does not exceed the extent of land which the landlord could have resumed from his tenant under Section 14. The section further barred the landlords from entering upon the land surrendered by their tenants without the previous permission in writing obtained from the Court. Thus there is a prohibition against surrender of any land by a tenant and a further prohibition against the landlord from entering upon the land surrendered by the tenant, without the previous permission in writing of the Court. THE KARNATAKA CERTAIN INAMS ABOLITION ACT, 1977 passed including temple inam lands into its ambit, the provisions of the act worth notable here: Section 4(2) (b) says all rights, title and interest vesting in the inamdar including those in all communal lands, cultivated lands, uncultivated lands, whether assessed or not, waste lands, pasture lands, forests, mines and minerals, quarries, rivers and streams, tanks and irrigation works, fisheries, and ferries shall cease and be vested absolutely in the State Government, free from all encumbrances ; Section 4(2) (j) says the tenants in the inam and persons holding under them and holders of minor inams shall, as against the State Government, be entitled only to such rights and privileges and be subject to such conditions as are provided for by or under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 and any other rights and privileges which may have accrued to them in the inam before the date of vesting against the inamdar shall cease and determine and shall not be enforceable against the State Government or such inamdar. Section 5(1) says every tenant of the inamdar or holder of a minor inam shall be entitled to be registered as an occupant of lands in respect of which he was a tenant immediately before first day of March, 1974 ; In a judgment . Shambhoo Nath Misra v. State of U.P., the Apex Court has no doubt pointed that fabrication of record and misappropriation of public fund by public servant is not his official duty and sanction for his prosecution for such alleged offence is not necessary. In which it was held that no sanction was required under Section 197 , Cr. P.C. for prosecuting a public servant for offences such as misappropriation, falsification of accounts, criminal conspiracy, etc. as they were not integrally connected with the official duties of the public servant. Shambhoo Nath Misra v. State of U.P., (1997) 5 SCC 326 : (1997 Cri LJ 2491), In the case of Afzal v. State of Haryana 1995 Supp (2) SCC 388 wherein Supreme Court observed: It cannot be lightly brushed aside and the tendency to file false affidavits or fabricated documents or forgery of the document and placing them as part of the record of the Court are matters of grave and serious concern. Ramaswamy J. Observed as follows None of them made any candid admission nor tendered unqualified contrite apology. Police officers, who are supposed to be the so- called disciplined force, have deliberately fabricated false records placed before this Court without any compunction. It is, therefore, of utmost importance to curb this tendency, particularly, when they have the temerity to fabricate the records with false affidavit and place the same before the highest Court of the land. Their depravity of conduct is writ large. M. S. Ahlawat (Superintendent of Police) Is unworthy to hold any office of responsibility. PRAYER:We the undersigned does not know any language except kannada and we explained all our grievances to _________________________ and prepared the above draft to convey you all the details. We hope your authority will take stern action against all those culprits by initiating suitable enquiry and proceedings as per law. THANKING YOU (RANGAPPA) YOURS FAITHFULLY (PUTTAMMA @ CHICKKATHIMMAKKA) (GOVINDARAJU)

YES HE GOT HIS REWARD FOR BEING PRO LINGAYATH LAND MAFIA AND ANTI DALITH POLICIES DURING HIS TENURE. YET IN ANOTHER CASE NEPS POLICE SUB INSPECTOR DINESH KUMAR ABSCONDS BY CREATING DALITH ATROCITY TO EVICT A DALITH FAMILY FROM THE LAND IN BATWADI- THIS IS OFFICIAL ANTI DALITH WAVE SUPPORTED BY BAD POLITICIANS AND ENCOURAGED BY SADIST AND PSYCHOPATH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Dr C. SOMSHEKAR