By
Zaffar Junejo
he camel must be a coward,
re-
would suggest. The act smacks of cruelty. However, the good news is that this prac-
the rod from the fire and, quickly yet firmly. fixes it on the neck of the camel. The usual
place in the village, and hearing the stricken groans of the herds. After
all, how was it possible that such a huge ani-
tice, used by herders to distinguish animals belonging to one community from another, is in decline, which seems like good news
for the animals. Branding is a particularily brutal prac-
mal could not bear the pain of a tiny burn? Crowds of spectators were amusing themselves at the scene, passing derogatory remarks over the bleating animals. The scene was telling
the burn wound infected. A septic wounc catalyses the process and the code soor:
becomes permanent. The animal's suffering is in no way mitigated, and as mentionec
the case
ters in Pakistan. Research in neurology sciences has proved that mammals have a f ully
propelling oxygen into fire, and sometimes by using kerosene oil. When the rod is red-
hot, the owner and the brander converse and confirm timing through hand-signals.
After that, the coding expert hurriedly takes
60 ] Newsline 0ctober
2013
tle owners and enquired about the history and tackground of animal coding in Thar. None of those interviewed could trace the orrgins of the practice. The
areas. Goats are also easier to sell, and are, therefore, preferred over cows. Goats and sheep are not coded in the
same way as cows and camels
are. A hot iron stamp can leave
a deep wound in the animal's soft skin, so they are identified instead by a cut around the
book, Tar e ekh-e-Registan (The History of the Desert), does not elaborate on the roots of
animal coding either. However,
Restructuring
of pasture
there are 18 differ.ent codes, associated with various surnames, castes and subgroups.
When a family stamps its respective code, it marks ownership of the coded animal to that
commissioned. An insensitive
compart-
specific family - be it Thakur, Meghwar or Bajeer. But only five o{ the 18 codes are still in use. There may be more than
one reason for this decline.
is
distinguishing symbols.
shape
ffi::Jli;Xi,,1;ffi:l:ff
factors pushed an unprepared Thari society into the stream
or consumerism.
time tO fgafh a pfgdg(tiVe age, When The new.-' they (an he ustd fOr milking or saffi-
the road network in Thar, cattle traders from Karachi and South Punjab started visiting
the desert, specially on the eve of Eid-ul-Azha. They preferred
ffi ,}.Jffi:.;::ffi;:X# fited for their meat. Additionally, goats l[iffiT:J['J:::5'Jjile tan easily be managed by women,
owners to
but
should be 'clean,' i.e. without any mark or cut. He believes that this is a decisive factor in
less
age, Sheep
and
l3lll,,Jll;
fffi:Jn[T[il',::"" soft skin, s0 they are ldentlfied instead by a (ut around tht taF, a spot of henna, f #:T:::Tj'* li[i::l ,, i.'?,:#;;,11':d fl:i:
Muslim communities. However,
the reduction in the usage of codes. Therefore, out of the five codes that are still in use, only two are frequently used codes today: the Tirshul and Surjio, which belong to non-
set
0f S$fne tOlOUfing.
I I 61