Anda di halaman 1dari 4

Cabrera, Jorge T.

658 S. Bonnie Brae St., Ste 2


Los Angeles, CA 90057
L.b. cgamc00H5c
Executive Ofce fr Im igation Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
Ofce of the Clerk
5107 Leebur Pike, Suite 2000
Fals Church. Vrginia 22041
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - LOS
606 S. Olive Street, 8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Name: GONZLEZ-VENTURA, MARIA SABASTIANA A076-318-715
Date of this notice: 3/25/2011
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-refrenced case.
Enclosure
Panel Members:
King, Carol
Sincerely,
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Maria Sabastiana Gonzalez-Ventura, A076 318 715 (BIA March 25, 2011)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
.b. gBtlm0f 0J05f00
Eecutive Ofce krImigration Review
Decision of the Board oflmigration Appeals
Falls Church, Virginia ZZ4l
File: A076 318 715 - Los Angeles, CA
Hre: MARIA SABASTIANA GONZALEZ-VENTUR
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL
Date:
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Jorge T. Cabrera, Esquire
ON BEHALF OF OHS: Rubab Z. Razvi
Assistant Chief Counsel
ORER:
MAR 2 5 2Di1
The respondent has appealed fom the Immigration Judge's April 28, 2009, decision denying her
motion to reopen. The Immigration Judge did not clearly state his reasons fr denying the motion,
describe which fcts he considered to be mis-stated, or provide legal authority fr his decision. We
therefre wiO remand the record to the Immigration Judge fr the preparation of a more complete
decision. In light of the inconsistency between the fcts stated in the motion and those stated in the
respondent's declaration, the Immigration Judge may fnd it prudent to conduct fct-fnding in
deciding the motion to reopen. See Matter of Rodriguez-Carri/o, 22 l&N Dec. 1031 (BIA 1999)
(discussing the importance of a full decision by a Immigration Judge).
Accordingly, the record is remanded fr fher proceedings.
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Maria Sabastiana Gonzalez-Ventura, A076 318 715 (BIA March 25, 2011)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Ii::IIGRTION COURT
606 SOUTH OLIVE ST., lSTH FL.
JORGE T. CABRERA, ESQ.
658 S. BONNIE BR STREET, #2
LOS AGELES, CA 90057
LOS AGELES, CA 90014
IN THE M.TTER OF FILE A 076-318-715
GONZALEZ-VENTURA, MARIA SABASTIANA
UNABLE TO FORWARD - NO ADDRESS PROVIDED
DATE: Apr 30, 2009
ATTACHED IS A COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE IMMIGRTION JUDGE. THIS DECISION
IS FINAL UNLESS A APPEAL IS FILED WITH THE BOAD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
WITHIN 30 CALENDA DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS WRITTEN DECISION.
SEE THE ENCLOSED FORMS AD INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPERLY PREPAING YOUR APPEAL.
YOUR NOTICE OF APPEAL, ATTACHED DOCUMENTS, A FEE OR FEE WAIVER REQUEST
.
MUST BE MAILED TO: BOARD OF IMMIGRTION APPEALS
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
P.O. BOX 8530
FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041
ATTACHED IS A COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE AS THE RESULT
OF YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT YOU SCHEDULED DEPORTATION OR REMOVAL HEAING.
'
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ULESS A MOTION TO REOPEN IS FILED IN ACCORDACE
WITH SECTION 242B(c) (3) OF THE IMMIGRATION AD NATIONALITY ACT, 8 U.S.C.
SECTION 1252B(c) (3) IN DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS OR SECTION 240(c) (6),
8 U.S.C. SECTION 1229a(c) (6) IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS. IF YOU FILE A MOTION
TO REOPEN, YOU MOTION MUST BE FILED WITH THIS COURT:
IMMIGRATION COURT
r .,
Los AGELES, CA 00141 _
{
606 SOUTH OLIVE ST., lSTH FL.
)OTHER' fc'.---
CC:
f 8
"*
* .
COURT
*
` ' ^ .*

" ' .
FF
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
In the Matter of:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IM!!IGRATION REVIEW
IMMIGRTION COURT
606 SOUTH OLIVE ST:, 15TH FL.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90014
Case No.: A076-318-715
GONZALEZ-VENTURA, MARIA SABASTIANA
Docket: LOS AGELES, C.LIFORNIA
RESPONDENT
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE
Motion to Reconsider an Immigration Judges decision
)
Motion to Reopen proceedings
.
,
filed in the above-entitled matter, it is hereby ordered that the motion
Be Granted
.



4
)
Be Denied for reasons indicated in the .. attached;decision
l ,
8
.
i ... ,..

/
, .. . ,

/1V,.fr; Yrl | >_J ,:i. . - |_ ,. "
//
,. I ' I _
I
no /t.0 / ~--'
/
/ .
J
/
I i ) , ,// '

-..
v
Appeal: NO APPEAL (AJIJB)
Appeal Due By: Mar 16, 1998
.: .
.
- i._

,
: : .: . -- .
,!
/ , I /// .-J
/ /
"J .
/
IHD D. WALTON
mngraUo.n Judge
Date:. Apr 28, 2009
/
(__.+,...

'. l

. . . ,

, ..... _g. "' .


a

.
.. \ . .
..
.
.
. "
_
*

:
4_

. ..
.
.
.
. .
. . .
" .
OHS
Other

1_ :'',:

."'


;-:..:
F

+ ` " .
.
_ : . ._
;'t .
.+_ ,
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t

Anda mungkin juga menyukai