land development, irrigation, transporta- plant species out of the total 32 priori- Rs 33,32,000. The state-wise break up of
tion of planting material, organic manure, tized species of the Board. However, the the proposals received and the amount of
barbed wire fencing, etc. Since each state selection of medicinal plant species for funds to be allocated to respective SMPBs
and Union Territory has its own State developing herbal gardens is not restric- are given in Table 1. Within a short pe-
Medicinal Plants Board (SMPB) working ted to prioritized species of the Board. riod of six months, submission of project
for NMPB, the funding provided by Marketing of cultivated medicinal plant proposals by 359 schools located at dif-
NMPB will be routed through respective species will be made through networking ferent corners of the country, reflects the
SMPBs. of SMPB, drug manufacturers and traders. interest and awareness of schools in me-
For developing herbal gardens in In order to meet the objectives, the dicinal plants. This interest will be a
schools, the concerned SMPBs will arrange Herbal Garden Scheme of the NMPB has milestone in developing the medicinal
to provide technical support with the help been circulated to all SMPBs for wider plants sector and the conservation of bio-
of state forest/horticulture/agriculture de- dissemination of the scheme. Within six logical diversity in the days to come.
partments of Agricultural Universities/ months (April to September 2006) a total
Research Institutions, whatsoever is near of 359 project proposals on School Herbal
the school. Besides, the SMPB will pro- Gardens have been received from 13 Chandra Prakash Kala* and Bikram
vide quality planting material. Only use States/Union Territories. After screening Singh Sajwan, National Medicinal
of organic manure/bio-fertilizer is sug- and internal reviews of all the proposals Plants Board, Chandralok Building, 36
gested for raising herbal gardens. A received, 238 proposals were found suit- Janpath, New Delhi 110 001, India
school may grow about 5–10 medicinal able for financial assistance, which costs *e-mail: cpkala@yahoo.co.uk
Is the work on plant systems 1. Fire, A., Xu, S. Q., Montgomery, M. K.,
Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E. and Mello, C.
ignored in the award of Nobel ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I thank Indian
C., Nature, 1998, 391, 806–811. National Science Academy (INSA) for the
Prize? 2. Napoli, C., Lemieux, C. and Jorgensen, R., award of a position of INSA Senior Scientist,
Plant Cell, 1990, 2, 279–289. during the tenure of which this article was
After the award of the 2006 Nobel Prize 3. Van der Krol, A. R., Mur, L. A., Beld, M., written. Thanks are also due to CCS Univer-
to Fire and Mello for the dicovery of the Mol, J. N. M. and Stuitje, A. R., Plant sity, Meerut for offering me the position of
mechnism involved in RNAi, questions Cell, 1990, 2, 291–299. Honorary Emeritus Professor, and to Head,
have also been raised arguing that recog- 4. Van Blokland, R., Van der Geest, N., Mol, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding,
nition of the earlier work done on RNAi J. N. M. and Kooter, J. M., Plant J., 1994, CCS University for providing facilities.
in plant systems was ignored. For in- 6, 861–877.
5. Caplen, N., Parrish, S., Imani, F., Fire, A.,
stance, in a letter published in Nature on
and Morgan, R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
October 26, 2006, it has been argued that
USA, 2001, 98, 9742–9747.
several aspects of the discovery that were 6. Kooter, J. M., Plant Epigenetics (ed. P. K. Gupta, Molecular Biology Labora-
cited in favour of the award including Meyer, P.), Blackwell Press, Oxford, 2005. tory, Department of Genetics and Plant
sequence specificity, RNA degradation 7. Vagin, V. V., Sigova, A., Li, C., Seitz, H., Breeding, Ch. Charan Singh University,
and post-transcriptional nature of gene Gvozdev, V. and Zamore, P. D., Science, Meerut 250 006, India
silencing were earlier demonstrated in 2006, 313, 320. e-mail: pkgupta36@hotmail.com
MEETING REPORT