(RI)(min)
Essentialoil()
b
O.basilicunL.
O.kilinandscha-
ricunGuerke
O.gratissinunL. O.canunSims.
O.tenuiorunL.
(greentype)
-Pinene 4.76 0.23 0.98 0.12 0.17
Camphor 4.87 0.64 21.65 0.15 3.47 0.05
Citral 5.26 23.51 1.23 0.52 0.33 0.22
Geraniol 5.76 34.89 0.49 1.52 0.14 0.83
Cineole 5.83 0.05 2.07 1.97 1.44
-Pinene 5.92 0.19 1.02 0.18 0.13 0.09
Citronellal 5.96 0.59 0.51 3.56 0.79 1.44
Eugenol 6.57 1.33 9.65 47.45 0.32 8.81
Vanillin 6.72 0.27 0.30 1.52 1.03 1.16
Linalool 7.41 2.21 0.23 0.12 0.02
a
identication of oil components was based on their relative retention indices (retention times) with those of authentic
standards,
b
quantitativeestimationwasdonebyanalysisofFIDareapercentdata
198
Vol. 31, 2013, No. 2: 194202 Czech J. Food Sci.
O.kilinandscharicunobtainedfromplantsgrown
innorthernIndia,wasfoundtoberichinO.ba-
silicunmethylchavicolandlinalool(21.9),O.
gratissinuneugenol(72.2),1.8-cineole(7.6),
germacrene D(2.7)and-caryophyllene(1.7),
and O. kilinandscharicun camphor (64. 9),
limonene (8.7), in accordance with previous
report(Poii&Vvvr2011).Similarresults
werefoundwithO.gratissinunandO.kilinand-
scharicun in sub tropical India (Vvvr et al.
2011). In the oils obtained from the aerial part
ofO.basilicungrowninColombiaandBulgaria,
linaloolandmethylcinnamatewerereportedas
the major components of volatile oils, respec-
tively ( Jivovv:z & Bucnnuvv 2001, Vi &
Muviiio 2003). It is interesting that the oils
extracted from Ocinun basilicun L. collected
from Bangladesh contain linalool and geraniol
as their main constituents (Mooviio et al.
2002), and the authors concluded that the oil
compositioncouldbedependentontheclimatic
conditions.Thechemicalcompositionofessential
oilsofOcinunspeciesshowsalargeinterspecies
variabilityand,withinthesamespecies,itseems
to depend on the genetic characteristics of the
plant and on the conditions under which it has
grown.Inthepresentstudy,ourfindingsonthe
majorcomponentsofO.kilinandscharicunand
Table3.AntibacterialactivityoftheessentialoilandmethanolextractofOcinunssp.againstthebacterialstrains
testedbasedondiscdiusionmethod
Microorganism
Inhibitionzoneindiameter(mm)aroundthediscsimpregnatedwith10lofessential
oilsandextracts(300gidisc)
essentialoil(10lidisc)
a
MeOHextracts
b
gentamicin
(10gidisc)
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
B.subtilis(MTCC441) 22 24 18 15 22 8 8 7
c
26
M.luteus(MTCC1541) 20 16 16 14 18 26
P.aeruginosa(MTCC741) 23 21 22 15 14 13
S.dysenteriae(clinicalisolate) 16 16 15 18 18
E.coli(MTCC443) 16 17 21 9 10 8 8 30
V.cholera(MTCC3904) 22 16 21 18 18 10 7 17
S.exneri(MTCC1457) 18 18 15 21 27
E1E5essentialoils:EIOcinunbasilicunL.,E2OcinunkilinandscharicunGuerke,E3OcinungratissinunL.,
E4OcinuncanunSims,E5OcinuntenuiorunL.(greentype),M1M5methanolextracts:M1Ocinunbasilicun
L.,M2OcinunkilinandscharicunGuerke,M3OcinungratissinunL.,M4OcinuncanunSims,M5Ocinun
tenuiorun L. (green type),
not active,
a
inhibition zone in diameter (mm) around the discs impregnated with 10 l of
essentialoil,
b
inhibitionzoneindiameter(mm)aroundthediscsimpregnatedwithextracts(300gidisc)
Table4. TeMICvaluesofessentialoilsofthevespeciesofOcinunagainstthebacterialstrainstestedinmicro-
dilutionassay(giml)
Microorganism
Essentialoil
O.basilicun
O.kilinand-
scharicun
O.gratissinun O.canun
O.tenuiorun
(greentype)
B.subtilis(MTCC441) 15.62 15.62 62.50 62.50 62.50
M.luteus(MTCC1541) 31.25 62.50 125 125 125
P.aeruginosa(MTCC741) 62.50 62.50 125 250 250
S.dysenteriae(clinicalisolate) 125 250 250 125 nt
E.coli(MTCC443) 15.62 31.50 31.50 nt 500
V.cholera(MTCC3904) 31.25 125 125 125 250
S.exneri(MTCC1457) 15.62 62.50 125 nt 62.50
ntnottested
199
Czech J. Food Sci. Vol. 31, 2013, No. 2: 194202
O.gratissinunoilswereinagreementwiththe
previousreport(Vvvretal.2011).According
totheliterature,themajorcompoundsconcerned
of O. basilicun, O. canun, and O. tenuif lorun
(green type) are different. The observed differ-
encesmaybeduetothedifferentenvironmental
andgeneticfactors,differentchemotypes,andthe
nutritional status of the plants as well as other
factorsthatcaninfluencetheoilcompositions.
Antibacterial activity (Disc diffusion test)
The in vitro antibacterial activities of the five
species of Ocinun essential oils and methanol
extracts against the microorganism employed
andtheirpotentialswerequalitativelyandquan-
titativelyassessedbythepresenceorabsenceof
inhibition zones and the zones diameters, MIC
values being showed in Tables 3 and 4. Accord-
ing to the result given in Table 3, the essential
oils of O. basilicun, O. kilinandscharicun, and
O. gratissinunhadagreatpotentialofantibacte-
rialactivities(inhibitiondiametersrangedfrom
1524 mm)againstall7 bacteriatested,whereas
thoseofO. canunandO.tenuiflorunhadsubstan-
tial activities (inhibition diameters ranged from
9 mmto22 mm)against5and6bacteriatested.
Ontheotherhand,thefractionsofthemethanol
extracts of O. basilicun, O. kilinandscharicun,
andO.gratissinunwerealsofoundtobeeffective
against B. subtilis, E. coli, and V. cholera out of
7 bacterialspeciesexamined(inhibitiondiameters
rangedfrom710 mm),respectively,probablydue
to the presence of similar compounds in these
methanol fractions, whereas those of Ocinun
canun Sims and Ocinun tenuiflorun L. plants
showednoantibacterialactivities(Table3).This
disagreement can be explained by that the bet-
terextractionofantimicrobialcompoundsfrom
various medicinal plants may require different
solvents.Whencomparedtothemethanolextracts,
theessentialoilsexhibitedastrongerandbroader
activityascomparedtothemethanolextracttested.
Based on these results of chemical composition
of the essential oils, it is possible to conclude
thattheantibacterialnatureoftheessentialoils
studiedisapparentlyrelatedtotheirhighphenolic
contents,particularlyoxygenatedterpenoidsand
phenolicterpenes,andthisfindingisinagreement
withpreviousreports(Buv:2004,Giiucciet
al.2009,Bssoiv&Juiii2012).Thisclaimis
furthersupportedbyourfindingsindicatinghigh
contents of terpenoids such as citral, geraniol,
eugenol, and camphor in the oils (Table 2). The
findings in this study support the observations
ofsomeotherresearchersaboutOcinunspecies
containing some substances with antibacterial
properties(Pvsoetal.1986,Nruvetal.
1999, Aovnoiu & Oioirvii 2005, Aoiouzvi
et al. 2005, Moonoor et al. 2011, Vvvr et
al.2011).However,itisdifficulttocomparethe
datawiththeliteraturebecauseseveralvariables
influencetheresults,suchastheenvironmental
andclimaticconditionsoftheplantandthechoice
oftheextractionmethodandantimicrobialtest.
Moreover,standardcriteriafortheevaluationof
the plant activity are missing and therefore the
results obtained by different authors are widely
different(Rvcioetal.1989,VovBuvonvet
al. 1991). This is the first study to provide data
about the extracts and essential oils of the five
species of Ocinun plants possessing potential
antibacterialactivitiesasevaluatedagainstseven
microorganisms.Theresultsindicatethatthees-
sential oils of Ocinun species can be used as a
naturalsourcethatmayleadtotheiruseassafe
alternatives to synthetic antimicrobial drugs. In
addition, the data in the present study support
theuseofOcinunspeciesasadditivesinfoods,
andastraditionalremediesforthetreatmentof
infectiousdiseases.
Minimum inhibitory concentration
All the essential oils tested were subjected to
MICstudiesagainstallthemicroorganisms.The
resultsinTable4interpretedasthelowestconcen-
trationsthatinhibitthevisiblemicrobialgrowth.
ThemaximalinhibitionzonesandMICvaluesfor
bacterialstrains,whichweresensitivetotheessen-
tialoilsofthefivespeciesofOcinun,wereinthe
rangeof924mmand15.62500giml(Table 4).
Basedontheseresults,itispossibletoconclude
thattheessentialoilshaveastrongerandbroader
spectrum of antimicrobial activity as compared
tothemethanolextractstested.Thisobservation
confirmedtheevidencegiveninapreviousstudy
reporting that the essential oils from medicinal
plantscontainmoreantimicrobialsubstancesthan
otherextractssuchaswater,methanol,ethanol,and
hexaneexstracts(Anroetal.1998,Eiorr1998).
Ourresultsalsoindicatedinthepresentstudythat
200
Vol. 31, 2013, No. 2: 194202 Czech J. Food Sci.
theO.basilicun,O.kilinandscharicun,andO.gra-
tissinunessentialoilsweremoreactiveagainst
allpathogenicbacteriaincludingGram-negatives
ones than the other two essential oils, probably
owingtothehighlevelsofphenoliccompounds
intheformerones(Table2).
According to a number of studies, the Gram-
positive bacteria are more sensitive to essen-
tialoilthanGram-negativebacteria.Apossible
explanation may reside in the possession of an
outer membrane, surrounding the cell wall of
Gram-negativebacteria,thusitislogicaltoexpect
thatthesebacteriawllbelesssusceptibletothe
antibacterialactivityofessentialoil.Thisouter
membrane may restrict the diffusion of hydro-
phobiccompoundsthroughitslipopolysaccharide
covering,presentingabarriertothepenetration
of numerous antibiotic molecule, and is also
associatedwiththeenzymesintheperiplasmic
space, which are capable of breaking down the
moleculesintroducedfromtheoutside(Niioo
1994,Goetal.1999).Gram-positivebacteriado
nothavesuchanoutermembraneandcellwall
structure.Theantibacterialsubstancescaneasily
destroytheirbacterialcellwallandcytoplasmic
membrane and cause leakage of the cytoplasm
anditscoagulation(Kivrn&Kuic2003).
However,thecurrentfindingsshowaremarkable
activityagainstallgram-negativebacteria.Thean-
tibacterialactivitiesofO.basilicun,O.kilinand-
scharicun, and O. gratissinun leaves extracts
essential oils may be due to high contents of
tannins and phenolic constituents. The most
active constituents (essential oils) rich in phe-
noliccompoundsarewidelyreportedtopossess
highlevelsofantimicrobialactivity(Pvsoet
al. 1986, Nruv et al. 1999, Dovr &
Dvs 2000), which has been confirmed and
extendedinthepresentstudy,althoughantimi-
crobial activities of phenolic compounds may
involve multiple modes of action. The mode of
actionofantimicrobialagentsalsodependsonthe
typeofmicroorganismsandismainlyrelatedto
theircellwallstructureandtheoutermembrane
arrangement.Medicinalplantscontaincomplex
phenolicsandthemechanismofactionofeach
phenolic compound against various bacteria is
also very complicated (Buv: 2004). Therefore,
itisnecessarytoinvestigatefurtherandunder-
standtherelationshipbetweentheantibacterial
activityandchemicalstructureofeachphenolic
compoundintheextractstested.
CONCLUSION
The growing tendency for replacing synthetic
additiveswithnaturaloneshasbroughtaboutgreat
interestintheevaluationofantimicrobialproper-
tiesoftheplantsproductsinbothacademicaland
industrial fields because of their relatively safe
status,wideacceptancebyconsumers,andtheir
exploitationforpotentialmultipurposefunctional
use.Tothebestofourknowledge,thisisthefirst
reportontheinvitrocomparativeevaluationof
theantibacterialactivitiesoftheessentialoilsand
methanolextractsoffivespeciesofOcinun.The
essentialoilsofOcinunspeciesprovedtopossess
interestingproperties,emergingfromboththeir
chemicalcompositionandfromtheevaluationof
theirinvitrobiologicalactivities.However,itis
verydifficulttoattributethebiologicaleffectofa
totalessentialoiltooneorafewactiveprinciples,
because in addition to the major compounds,
also minor compounds may make a significant
contributiontotheoilactivity.Fromtheresults
givenabove,wecouldinferthatOcinunessential
oils,indicatingstrongantibacterialactivities,are
very important botanical dietary supplements
that can be freely used in the food industry as
culinaryherbs.
Acknowledgement.TheauthorsaregratefultoDST-
FISTprogramme,Govt.ofIndia,DepartmentofBotany,
UniversityofKalyaniforInstrumentalfacilities.
Ref erences
AovnoiuT.T.,OioirviiS.A.(2005):Antimicrobialactiv-
ity of leaf extracts of Ocinun gratissinun on selected
diarrhoeacausingbacteriainsouthwesternNigeria.Af-
ricanJournalofBiotechnology,4:682684.
Aoiouzvi A., Guiiucv M., Svoui M., u:cu H.,
SnuF.,KvrU.(2005):Antimicrobialeffectsof
Ocinunbasilicun(Labiatae)extract.TurkishJournalof
Biology,29:155160.
Anrvv:nuisA.R.,HovvvvW.(2010):Antibacterial
activityofArtenisianilagiricaleafextractsagainstclini-
calandphytopathogenicbacteria.BMCComplementary
andAlternativeMedicine,10:6.
AnroI.,MvnroooZ.,MonrroF.(1998):Screening
ofsomeIndianmedicinalplantsfortheirantimicrobial
properties.JournalofEthnopharmacology,62:183193.
AnvsuK.,ViivisnriG.(2007):Improvedshelf
life of protein-rich tofu using Ocinun sanctun (tulsi)
201
Czech J. Food Sci. Vol. 31, 2013, No. 2: 194202
extracts to benefit Indian rural population. Journal of
FoodScience,72:M300-05.
BssoivI.H.N.,JuiiiH.R.(2012):Essentialoilsincom-
binationandtheirantimicrobialproperties.Molecules,
17:39894006.
Buv:S.(2004):Essentialoils:theirantibacterialproperties
andpotentialapplicationsinfoodsareview.Interna-
tionalJournalofFoodMicrobiology, 94:223253.
Ccvvvs A., Co O., Srvo B., Aouiiv L. (1990):
PlantsusedinGuatemalaforthetreatmentofgastroin-
testinaldisorders.1.Screeningof84plantsagainsten-
terobacteria.JournalofEthnopharmacology,30: 5573.
CnvivsD.J.,SiroJ.E.(1992):Essentialoilconstituents
of Ocinun kilinandscharicun Guerke. Journal of Es-
sentialOilResearch,4:125128.
Cn:vvivvA.,SuuiN.C.,LsiS.,Gnosnriurov
S. (1982): Nematicidal principles from two species of
Lamiaceae.JournalofNematology,14:118120.
Civvvovv J.E. (1928): Apparatus for determination of
volatileoil.JournaloftheAmericanPharmaceuticalAs-
sociation,17:346349.
CuJ.Q.,PvvivuF.,Dvi:sM.,Gsv:A.(1989):Com-
parison of the chemical composition of carrot seed es-
sential oil extracted by different solvents. Flavour and
FragranceJournal, 4:225231.
DvsnvovR.S.,TivisH.P.(1997):Insecticidalactivity
ofOcinunbasilicunL.Pesticides,12:2128.
DnvM.L.,DnvM.M.,DnB.N.,Mvnvo:vB.N.,
RovC.(1968):ScreeningofIndianplantsforbiological
activity,PartI.IndianJournalofExperimentalBiology,
62:32247.
DovrH.J.D.,DvsS.G.(2000):Antimicrobialagents
from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils.
JournalofAppliedMicrobiology,88:308316.
Eiorr J.N. (1998): Which extract should be used for the
screeningandisolationofantimicrobialcomponentsfrom
plantsJournalofEthnopharmacology,60:18.
EzvvsiiiC.N.,OniovK.A.,UouO.P.(2004):Evalua-
tionofanti-diarrhoealpropertyofcrudeaqueousextract
ofOcinungratissinunL.(Labiatae)inrats.Biokemistri,
16:122131.
Giiucci M.N., Oiiv M., Csvvo C., Drnoiv J.,
Lu A., Zvooio J., Dvro M. (2009): Antimicrobial
combinedactionofterpenesagainstthefood-bornemicro-
organismsEscherichiacoli,StaphylococcusaureusandBa-
cilluscereus.FlavourandFragranceJournal, 24:348354.
GoY.,VBviurM.J.,S:iivsM.E.(1999):Theouter
membraneofGramnegativebacteriainhibitsantibacte-
rialactivityofbrochocin-C.AppliedandEnvironmental
Microbiology,65:43294333.
Guv:C.,GvoP.A.,UiviR.C.,KurviA.(2008):An-
timicrobialactivityofsomeherbaloilsagainstcommon
food-bornepathogens.AfricanJournalofMicrobiology
Research,2:258261.
Jivovv:zL.,BucnnuvvG.(2001):Analysis,chemotype
andqualitycontroloftheessentialoilofnewcultivated
basil(OcinunbasilicunL.)plantfromBulgaria.Scientia
Pharmaceutica,69:8589.
Kivrn D., Kuic A. (2003): Antibacterial and an-
tifungal properties of essential oils. Current Medicinal
Chemistry,10:813829.
Kurv R.A., Sviovvi K., Kurv N.V., Nouvi S., R-
iooviS.(2004):Anticancerandimmunostimulatory
compounds from Andrographis paniculata. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology,92:291295.
LiJ.,OvouA.R.,Gvnvvn-KviivvM.,Hu:cniosA.D.,
Tvvnicnv S.E., Jovv A.K., V S:ov J. (1999):
PreliminaryscreeningofsometraditionalZulumedicinal
plants for anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activi-
ties.JournalofEthnopharmacology,68:267274.
Moonoor A.M.D., Snvvon J., Miiii P., Snvr
J.D.(2011):Antimicrobialactivityofessentialoilextract
of Ocinun basilicun L. leaves on a variety of patho-
genicbacteria.JournalofMedicinalPlantsResearch,5:
34533456.
Mooviio L., Zvvi G., Co:vovo A., Boccovsi
I., Cnoonuvv J.U., Usur M. (2002): Studies on the
chemical oil-bearing plants of Bangladesh. Part VIII.
Composition of some Ocinun oils O. basilicun L.
var.purpurascens,O.sanctunL.green,O.sanctunL.
purple,O.anericanunL.,citraltype,O.anericanun
L., camphor type. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 17:
335340.
Muvvv P.R., Bvo E.J., Priivv M.A., Tvovvv F.C.,
Yoiv R.H. (1995): Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
6
th
Ed.ASM,Washington.
NruvC.V.,NruvT.U.,BooE.,MvioA.F.N.,
Cov:vzD.A.G.,FiinoB.P.D.(1999):Antibacterialactiv-
ityofOcinungratissinunL.essentialoil.Memriasdo
InstitutoOswaldoCruz,94:675678.
N:nC.(2004):Antibioticsatthecrossroads.Nature,
431:899902.
NiiooH.(1994):Preventionofdrugaccesstobacterial
targetspermeabilitybarriersandactiveefflux.Science,
264:382388.
Nvvo A.K., Asvv-Av H., Orosunvv M., Aoov
M.E.(2002):ExtractofOcinuncanunlowersbloodglu-
coseandfacilitatesinsulinreleasebyisolatedpancreatic
beta-isletcells.Phytomedicine,9:346351.
Onvo-Orovi D., Rvicnru:n C.H., Bvviv A.J., Hs-
sii A. (1998): Toxicity and protectant potential of
camphor,amajorcomponentofessentialoilofOcinun
kilinandscharicun,againstfourstoredproductbeetles.
InternationalJournalofPestManagement,44:203209.
202
Vol. 31, 2013, No. 2: 194202 Czech J. Food Sci.
Ozi K., Nvr S., Kzov K., Tisni Y.
(1998):Antiaggreganteffectsonhumanplateletsofcu-
linaryherbs.PhytotherapyResearch,12:603605.
Poii R.C., Vvvr R.S. (2011): Comparative volatile
oilcompositionoffourOcinunspeciesfromnorthern
India.NaturalProductLetters,25:569575.
P:o A. (1992): A synopsis of Ocinun L. (Labiatae) in
Africa.KewBulletin,47:405437.
PvsoG.,KurvA.,SionA.K.,Bn::cnvvA.K.,
Sion K., Snvr V.D. (1986): Antimicrobial activity
ofessentialoilsofsomeOcinunspeciesandcloveoil.
Fitoterapia,57:429432.
Rvcio M.C., Rios J.L., Viiiv A. (1989): Antimicrobial
activityofselectedplantsemployedintheSpanishMedi-
terraneanarea.PartII.PhytotherapyResearch,3:7780.
RvuvviR.,FivisnvvA.,Pu:ivvsvE.(1984):Fungistatic
activityofessentialoilsfromOcinunbasilicunchemo-
types.JournalofPhytopathology,110:2022.
Snvvi K., Ku:: G. (2007): Activation of cytotoxic T
lymphocyteresponsesandattenuationoftumorgrowth
in vivo by Andrographis paniculata extract and andro-
grapholide.ImmunopharmacologyandImmunotoxicol-
ogy,29:8193.
SionS.K.,AoA.,VvvrS.K.,SiooiQuiM.A.,M-
:nuvA.,SiiS.(2011):Analysisofphytochemical
andantioxidantpotentialofOcinunkilinandscharicun
Linn. International Current Pharmaceutical Research
Journal,3:40-46.
SorvA.,GuiiucvM.,Avui:H.A.,DrvvvvD.,
Tvvv B., Poiissiou M., Sorv M., Sni F. (2004):
Theinvitroantimicrobialandantioxidantactivitiesofthe
essentialoilsandmethanolextractsofendemicThynus
spathulifolius.FoodControl,15:627634.
TviciI.,BvvrE.,YiirzG.,AvciB.(2006):Variability
in essential oil composition of Turkish basils (Ocinun
basilicunL.).BiochemicalSystematicandEcology,34:
489-497.
VovBvvonvD.A.,Viiv:iicA.J.(1991):Screening
methodsforantibacterialandantiviralagentsfromhigher
plants. In: Dvv P.M., Hvnovv J.B. (eds): Methods in
PlantBiochemistry.AcademicPress,London:4767.
VvvrR.S.,Bisn:P.S.,PoiiR.C.,SiiD.,Cnu-
nA.(2011):Chemicalcompositionandantibacterial
activityofessentialoilfromtwoOcinunspp.grownin
sub-tropicalIndiaduringspring-summercroppingsea-
son.JournalofTraditionalMedicines,6:211217.
VivivR.F.,SiroJ.E.(2000):Chemicalcharacterization
of basil (Ocinun spp.) found in the markets and used
intraditionalmedicineinBrazil.EconomicBotany,54:
207216.
ViA.,MuviiioE.(2003):Essentialoilcompositionfrom
twelvevarietiesofbasil(Ocinunspp)growninColom-
bia.JournalofBrazilianChemicalSociety,14:744749.
Wvvvv F., Ovro P., Asovo R. (1999): Antibacterial
activityofEastAfricanMedicinalplants.JournalofEth-
nopharmacology,60:7984.
WHO (1993): Summary of WHO guidelines for the as-
sessmentofherbalmedicines.HerbalGram, 28:1314.
YrsiK.,NoM.,Kn:T.,MoviH.,O:v
T.,UvnN.,OisniI.,IriR.,YrvM.,Nruv
M.,Muv:H.,NisniT.(1998): Anti-HIV-1activ-
ity of herbs in Labiatae. BiologicalandPharmaceutical
Bulletin,21:829833.
ReceivedforpublicationJune11,2012
AcceptedaftercorrectionsAugust22,2012
Correspondingauthor
Prof.Pv:novnGnosn,Ph.D.,UniversityofKalyani,CytogeneticsandPlantBiotechnologyResearchUnit,
DepartmentofBotany,741235,Nadia,WestBengal,India,E-mail:pdgbot@yahoo.co.in