Everyone agrees on some basic things - About how art worlds developed But disagreement on how to understand how they work today Two main approaches: - Howard ! Becker - "ierre Bourdieu
Bourdieu: #ield $o# cultural production% Durkheim: social structures influence individuals actions Weber: struggles and competition between individuals and groups To win power, be dominant &'()*+&T Becker $art world% American S mbolic !nteractionism &'-'"E,AT+'( Art is "collectivel produced# $ourdieu is mis-guided
Everyone agrees!!!
Art - A label, put on some things and not others - %abel put on things b powerful groups - !nvented & Social construction of modern societ - When' ()th centur !tal onwards*** - Wide influence from earl (+th centur : - The Romantics: Art versus Society Art versus Mass Culture
Art becomes institutionalised from c* (,-.s -ethod .: "A&E /reate new, separate, special spheres for the "worship# of "Art# "aul /i-aggio: Before 1850s, mixing of different sorts of culture After 1850s, culture divided up into separate spheres Art !igh culture" concert halls, opera houses Mass culture" popular theatres # clu$s
-ethod 0: -A,1ET A(/ -'(E2 Things defined as "Art# said not to be made for mone & profit 0nl "1ass /ulture# is made for profit 2omantic idea "Art for Arts Sake# "Artists# pure motives & creativit & self e3pression Art 4apparentl 5 removed from the wider 6conom
-ethod 0: -A,1ET A(/ -'(E2 $7T "Art# comes to have its own special economy Be#ore .3th &: products made for rich patrons 4"patronage# s stem5 .3th &: products made for a new art market, of 4upper5 middle class consumers S0 the "art world# is an econom that denies it is an econom /ollective belief: "Art# is about more than mone
-ethod 4: BE&'-+(5 A6T'('-'6 $efore (+th /: the production of cultural products is 80T S69A2AT6 :201 other parts of societ - %irect ECONOMIC control $y patrons - %irect POLITICAL control $y governments - esp* b (5 censorship; < Academies - :rom (,-.s: "art world# starts to break free of these forms of control $ecomes an "autonomous# social sphere
So by about .377!!! 9eople T=!8> there is a thing called "the art world#, and T=!8> it is "special# !t S661S to be removed from other parts of societ !t A/T7A%%? is, in this sense: !t works according to its own uni@ue wa s of operating !t is not controlled from "outside# !t has its own: (5 uni@ue econom <5 uni@ue forms of prestige: "great artist#
B'6,/+E6 - 6--A,2
HAB+T6 < &A"+TA* < )+E*/ An individual is thoroughl shaped b their =A$!T7S =A$!T7S is class-based An individuals =A$!T7S is primaril that of the social class of their parents 4this can be changed to some e3tent later eg b formal education5 Some =A$!T7S are more sociall valued than others: 7pper middle class & working class
B'6,/+E6 - 6--A,2
7pper middle class habitus A '&+ATE/ 8+TH high levels o# &A"+TA* T=266 T?96S 0: 5E(E,A* /A9!TA%: a56conomic b5Social c5/ultural %ower middle class habitus D middling levels Working class habitus D low levels
)+E*/ "articular parts o# society are #ields: e*g* 6ducation, 2eligion, Eovernment, /ultural 9roduction, /ultural /onsumption (5Struggles&competition A between different <5individuals A A8D between different groups F5=ierarchicall organised: positions at top & middle & bottom G5 Struggles: those at top tr sta at top; those at middle and bottom want to take over top positions -5 Which position ou occup will be strongl influenced b our =abitus and /apital
-5 ?our habitus and capital must be ,E*E=A(T for the specific field ou are in )5 6ach field is centred around its own S96/!:!/ 4uni@ue5 T?96 0: /A9!TA% *ield of music" music capital *ield of +a,," +a,, version of music capital H5 To be "successful# in a field, ou must have a5The "right# sort of habitus and general capital :02 T=AT :!6%D 4in most, but not all fields, this means upper middle class habitus5 b5 =igh levels of the specific capital valued !8 T=AT :!6%D
mall or no audience (ot #or pro#it Art #or art;s sake Autonomy
mall or no audience (ot #or pro#it Art #or art;s sake Autonomy
",'/6&E, : 6nknown9 lowbudget indie directors
.% 8hat T2"E o# cultural producer ou become 4i*e* which sort of position ou occup in the field5 Will be strongl influenced b our habitus and our general capital these will influence what field-specific capital ou can get <5 6ach T?96 of producer /+ *+1E what the 0T=62 T?96S represent & do "Sell-outs# 02 "pretentious# F5 &onstant struggles < competition -he young ne. .ant to overthro. the old esta$lished
Things to note:
Howard ! Becker
Bourdieu over-emphasises: - 9ower of habitus I capital - Struggles and competition - =idden, unconscious structures Bourdieu assumes what he will find 8ot empiricall -grounded need more fle3ible, more empiricall sensitive, grounded approach replace #ields with art worlds
The production of "art# 4or "popular culture#5 alwa s involves collective action 1ultiple people working together to produce something - This is "co-operation#, in a "cultural division o# labour# /o-operation need not be harmonious can involve conflicts
6ven a solitary individual producer is involved in collective action 4without necessaril realising it5 The actions of a producer could have been di##erent from what the were some freedom of choice not .holly ha$itus/shaped Actions are guided b conventions - conventional .ays of ma0ing things - saves time # effort - &nnovations involve $ending conventions 9roducers observe each other I adapt their actions in light of this: alwa s collective production
"ower: Eatekeepers %eciding .hich artists art.or0s .ill $e valued not valued Art world gatekeepers trans#orm products into art e1g1 1250s on" '+a,, art .orld( &nvented $y music critics and po.erful musicians Eatekeepers never have total power
Art worlds more open and #luid than $ourdieu can see 1ust use ethnographic observation o# people actually making artworks The making of artworks is open9 conte?t-dependent @ comple? - 3roduct at start can $e very different from the finished version - )ever a simple expression of class $ased ha$itus
Becker - "roblems
.% -icro-#ocus A but where is "wider societ #' 0% &lass-based habitus not important' 4% impli#ies Bourdieu: