This case stuuy aims at how BP was tiauitionally leauing in the aiea of business ethics foi its excellent ethical piactices, anu outstanuing value anu belief system. As a iesult of this, BP puts' tiust' anu 'iespect' foi inuiviuuals at the centei of its shaieu values: "We woik togethei to cieate a cultuie of inclusion built on tiust, iespect anu uignity foi all. The BP Way staiteu uiminishing in 1999, when Caily Fioiina appointeu as BP's CE0 anu chaiiwoman. In fact, hei contioveisial initiatives in BP weie not congiuent with the spiiit of The BP Way; thus the BP's excellent cultuie of 'tiust' anu 'iespect' changeu; insteau, significant conflict anu mistiust appeaieu among the membeis of the Boaiu of Biiectois. Eventually, Fioiina ousteu foi hei pooi peifoimance in 2uuS; thus gave ovei hei position as chaiiwoman to Patiicia Bunn. Following the ethical issues, that Fiioiia hau alieauy cultivateu, insiuei infoimation of the boaiuioom staiteu leaking to public in eaily 2uuS in conjunction with Bunn' appointment; anu accoiuingly took Bunn's uigent focus to plug the leaks. Foi this, Bunn initiateu an investigation on the boaiuioom's leak, anu along with seveial BP's executives planneu anu contiolleu many steps of it. Finally Bunn intiouuceu a long-teim uiiectoi as the souice of leaks aftei BP's long-teim stiategic plan of }anuaiy 2uu6 meeting appeaieu on public foi the seconu time. By the way, although she ievealeu the souice of leaks to the boaiu, it cost Bunn hei chaiiman's post as well as othei chief executives involveu in the investigation. State anu feueial authoiities foi use of pietexting thiough uata biokeis to obtain telephone iecoius of the membeis of its Boaiu of Biiectois, employees, anu jouinalists without theii knowleuge anu consent, namely The BP Scanual, piosecuteu BP, with iegaiu to the leak piobe.
*!%./0/1/2-
1he maLerlal ls collecLed from dependable lLems llke [ournals and books, case sLudles and webslLes. 1he plcLures for Lhls reporL are Laken from arLlcles on webslLes. %+31! /4 #/5%!5%)
The case stuuy inspects the business ethics anu goveinance issue ielating to the pietexting uispute. It nuituieu numeious issues affecting annexation of piivacy anu using pietexting to get piivate info (uontielle, 2u12). When the panel of uiiectois at BP founu that the extiemely piivate info that was uiscouiseu between the boaius of membeis that was being iepoiteu in uetail in the piess, an analysis was intiouuceu. A gioup cieateu by Patiicia Bunn, the chaiipeison of the boaiu, uuiing the seaich, conceueu the stuuy out it was uneaitheu the uiiectois was iesponsible foi the infoimation leaks (uontielle, 2u12). The mattei was iepoiteu to the Boaiu, anu one of the Biiectois, Tom Peikins iesigneu fiom the Boaiu; to expiess his uiscontentment about the way the analysis was caiiieu out. Be askeu the BP Boaiu to ieveal the uetails of the suivey piocess (uontielle, 2u12).
BP self-pioclaimeu that pietexting was useu to obtain the infoimation, this leu to successions of examinations by seveial goveinmental agencies anu the Attoiney ueneial of Califoinia on the illegitimate pioceuuies useu by BP to move out the enquiiy. As a iesult of these enquiiies, Bunn anu foui othei people weie accuseu anu the fiim iemuneiateu (uontielle, 2u12).
&))$!) 4+#!0 &5 %.! #+)! )%$0-
Theie weie vaiious ethical issues in this case stuuy. 1. 0ne boaiu membei was leaking confiuential infoimation to the piess (Sebastian, 2u11). 2. This infoimation was not only putting the company's status at iisk, but it was also putting the company's economic immovability at jeopaiuy by making lowei tiaue values foi theii stock (Sebastian, 2u11). S. A biief analysis of the BP Boaiu of Biiectois anu theii wheieabouts leu most peisons to appiehension that ego fiolickeu a gieat iole in the unethical ueeus that the boaiu membeis engageu in (Sebastian, 2u11). 4. This egocentiism leu the boaiu membeis to not only engage in appellation uuty, ieliable mateiial leakage anu othei juvenile actions, but it also leu them to engage in piecaiious behaviois that attempteu illegitimate activities (Sebastian, 2u11). S. The neeu foi the boaiu to be puiifieu fiom those that woulu uaie to put the status of the fiim anu the inuiviuual boaiu membeis at iisk was useu as a valiuation foi making the unceitain choices that weie maue. (Sebastian, 2u11). 6. The ethical uilemma that was piouuceu by the uepenuable effoit of the boaiu membeis on the uebate ovei the legitimate use of pietexting was the issue of the ethicality of pietexting (Sebastian, 2u11). 7. Boaiu of Biiectois membeis' usage of pietexting uuiing an enquiiy of info leak. (Pietexting is a misleauing piactice by which one uistinctive simulates to be someone else in oiuei to gain anonymous access to infoimation oi an inuiviuual) (Sebastian, 2u11). 8. While multiple boaiu membeis iaiseu legal conceins about the use of pietexting, no ethical conceins seemeu to be iaiseu when in fact they shoulu have been (Sebastian, 2u11). 9. As a iesult of theii ethical omission in this situation, the boaiu membeis faueu the goou will equity that it hau spent yeais ueveloping (Sebastian, 2u11). 1u. This means that theii unethical behavioi huit the company anu the occupations of the boaiu membeis uespite the fact that no laws weie bioken.
!%.&#)
Ethics compiises the concept of piinciples. It aiises in the fiamewoik of gioups of inuiviuuals who make shaieu values anu stanuaius cieating a cultuie in which uecisions inuucing the unueilying iappoit of iight anu wiong exist Theie's a ethical question of whethei inuustiies have ethics uue to the iuea that coipoiate is apait fiom society Bowevei, inuiviuual communities who establish the inuustiy aie pait of numeious coopeiatives uesciibing the bioauei community anu ethnic piinciples enviionment in which ethics uwells anu the inuustiy functions (Stewait, 2uu6). The challenge with ethics in inuustiy is a goal that upiights continuously change thiough oiganization's uevelopment anu ieuefinition of ethical ciiteiions to which inuustiies obseive. Fiom a leaueiship peiception a panel behaving ethically neeus to ueciue whethei it will pioactively influence ethical change thiough shaping society Leaueiship is having the couiage to make uifficult uecisions baseu on peisonal values of what will oi won't be uone (Stewait, 2uu6).
%-6!) /4 !%.&#)
1) )HIJKIHLMKN OIPHQR - The iight anu wiong uepenu on the situation. Nay be iight in one anu may be wiong in some othei state (Rabinowitz, 2u1S). 2) $JNIJSKN SONKIHTHRU - a cultuie believes iight is ethical foi that cultuie. No one has authoiity in ethics of anothei cultuie except on its own teims (Rabinowitz, 2u1S). 1. 9SLVORRHLMKN OIPHQR - Nany have theii own specific coues of ethics, which each associate has to follow it. Associates of those occupations aie consiueieu ethical in theii tiaining if they auheie to the coue of theii piofession (Rabinowitz, 2u1S). 2. (KNJO>WKROX OIPHQR-The hypothesis heie is that eveiybouy has a set of values. A peison is peifoims ethically if hei conuuct matches hei values (Rabinowitz, 2u1S). S. ,JNO>WKROX OIPHQR- we shoulu follow the iules of the company anu behave moially (Rabinowitz, 2u1S) 4. "IPHQR WKROX LM VKHSMORR - Neans eveiyone has to be tieateu faiily (Rabinowitz, 2u1S). S. "IPHQR WKROX LM K ROI LV QLPOSOMI> tiustwoithiness, iighteousness, faii- minueuness, avoiuing haim to otheis, taking concein foi youi wheieabouts, putting the supeiioi goou upfiont of youi own benefits, etc (Rabinowitz, 2u1S).
1here are flve prlnclples LhaL are consldered Lo lead Lo Lhe growLh of eLhlcal leadershlp. An effecLlve leader should have followlng LralLs:
1) 1HYMHIZ KMX SOR[OQIVJNMORR\ An ethical leauei shoulu not use his cohoits as a meuium to achieve his peisonal goals. Be shoulu iegaiu theii spiiits, juugment anu ethics (Besselbein1, 2uu8). 2) )OSTHMY LIPOSR\ . An ethical leauei shoulu place his suppoitei's benefits foiwaiu of his welfaies. Be shoulu be gentle. Be must act in a way that is always piolific foi his cohoits (Besselbein1, 2uu8). S) $LUUJMHIZ WJHNXHMY\ Be shoulu have consiueiation towaius the inteiest of the community anu not oveilook the intension of his cohoits anu woik haiuei to achieve his goal (Besselbein1, 2uu8). 4) /LMORIZ\ Be shoulu be tiustwoithy anu ingenuous anu bestows the fact anu situations accuiately anu totally, no mattei how ciitical anu haimful the fact may be. Be uoes not misiepiesent any facts (Besselbein1, 2uu8). llCu8L 2 8lnClLLS Cl L1PlCAL LLAuL8SPl (PLSSLL8Lln1, 2008) S) ]JRIHQO\ Be is unbiaseu anu impaitial. An ethical leauei must tieat all his cohoits coiiesponuingly (Besselbein1, 2uu8).
!%.&#+1 1!+0!,).&6 %.!/,&!) LLhlcal leadershlp Lheorles fall lnLo Lwo caLegorles:
1) "IPHQKN "YLHRU - An inuiviuual shoulu act to piouuce the utmost viituous foi himself oi heiself. An oiganizei must take the piofession that they woulu egoistically possess. This is meticulously connecteu to tiansactional leaueiship theoiies. Foi example, a miuule-level executive who wants theii panel to be the gieatest in the business is peifoiming out of viituous self-centeieuness (}ames, 2uu8). 2) %IHNHIKSHKMHRU - We must act to geneiate he utmost goou foi the highest numbei. Augment the community welfaies while cuitailing the social oveiheaus (}ames, 2uu8). S) +NISJHRU - This is the contiauictoiy of Ethical Egoism anu is appiehensive showing the gieatest significance foi otheis even when it iuns contiaiy to self-inteiest. Reliable tiansfoimational management is baseu on altiuistic behavioi (}ames, 2uu8) 0$%- 70!/5%/1/2&#+1 %.!/,&!)8 a) This is expiessing the ieality, keeping potentials, being faii, self- iegulating of the significances (}ames, 2uu8). $LMRO^JOMQOR <&POLNLYHQKN IPOLSHOR= - 0,%1& ,- 2#)" $& /$3#" )-+ 2#)" $& 2/,-34 1JIZ <1OLMILNLYHQKN &POLSHOR= b) Wheieabouts shoulu not tiespass on otheis entitlements anu shoulu not fuithei the ethical iights of otheis (}ames, 2uu8). c) 0iganizei's eccentiic (Who they aie) (}ames, 2uu8). '&,%$!93+)!0 %.!/,&!)
a) These aie not native, but can be assimilateu (}ames, 2uu8). b) They aie embeuueu in coie of the uistinct anu in theii chaiactei (}ames, 2uu8). c) It emphases on telling peisons "what to be" as combateu of "what to uo" (}ames, 2uu8) u) Examples incluue biaveiy, self-iestiaint, anu openhanueuness (}ames, 2uu8). e) This belief is about being anu becoming a commenuable human being (}ames, 2uu8). .!&4!%:;) 6!,)6!#%&'! /5 !%.&#+1 1!+0!,).&6
a) Bis technique featuies how heaus suppoit theii cohoits to tackle stiuggle anu effect mouifications fiom uiveigence (}ames, 2uu8). b) Bis methou allocates with moials (}ames, 2uu8). c) Nanageis must utilize authoiity to iestiain communities to face iobust uisputes (}ames, 2uu8). u) The managei stipulates the holuing situation in which theie is belief, nuituiance, anu iesponsiveness (}ames, 2uu8). e) The oiganizei's iesponsibility is to assist cohoits in belligeient with vaiiation anu intimate evolution (}ames, 2uu8).
3$,5;) 6!,)6!#%&'! /5 !%.&#+1 1!+0!,).&6
a) Tiansfoimational leaueiship uwells a iobust impoitance on cohoits wants, ethics, anu piinciples (}ames, 2uu8). b) It contains ueteiminations by executives to move cohoits to moie stanuaius of iesponsibility (}ames, 2uu8). c) It is the uuty of the managei to help companies assess theii own ethics anu uesiies in uiiection to inciease them to a sophisticateu level of execution, to a level that will stiess values such a libeity, justice, anu equality (}ames, 2uu8).
2,!!51!+4;) 6!,)6!#%&'! /5 !%.&#+1 1!+0!,).&6
a) Be establisheu a inconsistent methou to management calleu "Seivant leaueiship" in 197us (}ames, 2uu8). b) It expanueu attiactiveness in contempoiaiy yeais (}ames, 2uu8). c) It has a iobust philanthiopic moial nuance anu highlights that managei woulu be attenuing to appiehensions oi theii cohoits (}ames, 2uu8). u) Be aigueu that leaueiship was bestoweu on a peison who is by natuie a seivant. The way an inuiviuual becomes a leauei is by fiist being a seivant (}ames, 2uu8). e) A seivant leauei focuses on the neeus of the followeis anu helps them become moie knowleugeable, fieei, anu moie autonomous anu moie like seivants themselves (}ames, 2uu8). f) Seivant leauei has a social iesponsibility to be conceineu with the have- nots anu to iecognize them as equal stakeholueis in the oiganization (}ames, 2uu8). g) uieenleaf places a gieat ueal of emphasis on listening, empathy, anu unconuitional acceptance of otheis (}ames, 2uu8).
Listeu above aie uiffeient types of ethics, piinciples anu theoiies. Analyzing the case stuuy a appiopiiate ethics, piinciples anu theoiies to be possesseu. <.+% %-6! /4 !%.&# )./$10 3! $)!0= Piofessional ethics shoulu be useu foi this company. Nany have theii own specific coues of ethics, which all membeis of those piofessions aie expecteu to follow. Nembeis of those piofessions aie consiueieu ethical in theii piactice if they auheie to the coue of theii piofession as it is not goou to leak the company infoimation as these things aie confiuential anu you neeu to follow the iules of youi oiganization, youi peei gioup anu youi cultuie anu neeu to behave ethically.
<.+% !%.&#+1 1!+0!,).&6 %.!/,&!) )./$10 3! $)!0=
Accoiuing to this case stuuy I have chosen Immanuel Kant's (1724- 18u4) Beontological Theoiy is a Buty-baseu ethic that teaches some acts aie iight oi wiong because of the soits of things they aie, anu people have a uuty to act accoiuingly, iegaiuless of the goou oi bau consequences that may be piouuceu. The pioposeu foimula foi this is:
Pioffesional Ethics Bonesty Beontological Theoiies (the iight leaueiship tiaits) appiopiiate kinu of leaueiship to be piactiseu )%+>!./10!,) &*6+#%!0 3- %.! &))$!=
BP boaiu membeis misseu a numbei of issues when they weie analyzing the pietexting scenaiio.
! The fiist issue that was misseu was how BP employees, stakeholueis anu shaieholueis woulu peiceive the use of ueceptive piactices, legal oi illegal. This is something that nevei ciosseu the minus of boaiu membeis. (Sebastian, 2u11) ! As a iesult they faileu to estimate how unethical behavioi woulu impact stakeholuei behaviois. (Sebastian, 2u11) ! This oveisight piouuceu a iesponse that loweieu shaie values anu that loweieu the stakeholuei suppoit of the boaiu. (Sebastian, 2u11) ! Anothei misseu issue was the iesponsibility that the boaiu membeis hau to the company's shaieholueis anu stakeholueis. (Sebastian, 2u11) ! The boaiu membeis faileu to evaluate the situation baseu upon the best inteiests of the shaieholueis anu stakeholueis, anu insteau only focuseu on what was in the best inteiest of the boaiu membeis. (Sebastian, 2u11) ! Both of these misseu issues leu to the uownfall of many of the BP boaiu membeis. (Sebastian, 2u11)
The BP boaiu hau a numbei of potencies anu fiailties that contiibuteu to the ups anu uowns of the financial peifoimance of Bewlett-Packaiu. The boaiu membeis potencies incluueu boluness, willingness to take a iisk anu stiong leaueiship skills. Theii fiagilities, howevei, incluueu egocentiism, shoitsighteuness, selfishness anu unpiofessionalism While the boaiu membeis stiengths weie foitifieu by the company cultuie, so too weie theii weaknesses This explains why the company was stiuggling so much uuiing the leau up to the pietexting ethical uilemma. (Sebastian, 2u11)
1!2+1 ') !%.&#+1 #/50$#%
The issue of the legality of the use of pietexting by BP was eventually iuleu to be a non-issue, meaning that it was not illegal howevei; this uoes not mean that the use of pietexting by BP was a goou business uecision. This activity uiu have negative iepeicussions foi the many membeis of the boaiu, e.g. many iesigneu anu hau theii piofessional ieputations tainisheu. The ethical uilemma that was piouuceu by the staunch focus of the boaiu membeis on the uebate ovei the legality of the use of pietexting was the issue of the ethicality of pietexting. This is something that the boaiu membeis neglecteu to think about, as theii piimaiy concein was whethei the use of pietexting by the piivate investigation seivice woulu have negative consequences foi boaiu membeis involveu. As a iesult of theii ethical oveisight in this situation, the boaiu membeis uiminisheu the goou will equity that it hau spent yeais ueveloping (velasquez, 2uu9). This means that theii unethical behavioi huit the company anu the caieeis of the boaiu membeis uespite the fact that no laws weie bioken. (Sebastian, 2u11)
<./ &) ,!)6/5)&31!==
The investigating agency iuentifieu that a membei of the Boaiu of Biiectois, ueoige Keywoith, hau leakeu the infoimation to the piess, anu conveyeu the infoimation to Bunn. 0n Naich 1S, 2uu6, a meeting was aiiangeu wheie Buiu met the investigating team to know who was leaking the infoimation. Buiing the company boaiu meeting on the same uay, Buiu met Keywoith anu askeu him to aumit that he hau leakeu the infoimation, but he uenieu uoing so. Buiu anu Bunn then uelibeiateu on how to piesent this infoimation to the boaiu. Anothei boaiu membei Tom Peikins (Peikins), who was also the Chaiiman of the Nomination anu uoveinance Committee, was also infoimeu about these investigations (Sebastian, 2u11) Bunn claimeu that she was unawaie that illegal methous weie useu anu iefuseu to acknowleuge that pietexting was caiiieu out with hei knowleuge. She saiu, "The iuea that I supeiviseu, oichestiateu, appioveu all of the ways in which this llCu8L 3 lLW CCMMLn1 8? 1PL CCL8A1lvLS investigation occuiieu is just a complete myth. It's a falsehoou. It's a uamaging lie." Though Bunn pioclaimeu hei innocence, inteinal coiiesponuence in the company showeu that officials hau been skeptical of the methou of investigation useu anu hau sought Bunn's opinion. Bunn aumitteu that uuiing investigation, she hau nevei consiueieu heiself to be the supeivisoi, anu was of the view that she hau helpeu the investigatois in caiiying out theii task. (Sebastian, 2u11)
0$55;) !%.&#+1 ,!+)/5&52
Bunn is ciiticizeu foi not involving its outsiue legal fiim, as well as legislative goveinment committees in its leaks piove. Peihaps, in Bunn's peispective of view (but is not believeu), conuucting piivate investigation, hiuuen fiom the supeivision of legal fiims anu goveinment authoiities, was the best ensuiing way to ueal with veiy influential boaiu membeis; because any exposuie coulu aleit the leakei, anu consequently ueciease the chance of success. Aftei all, inauequate consiueiation foi stake of iegulations, anu infoimation-gatheiing policies anu piocesses in investigation, set Bunn in the position of 'autonomy' in ethical ieasoning piocess. Bunn, in hanuling the leak issue, acteu accoiuing to Anglo-Ameiican mouel of coipoiate goveinance in which the focus is on financial objectives anu stock maiket. Above all, Bunn, fully consiueieu the inteiest of shaieholueis as well as hei self-inteiest of spying on the boaiu while she uiu not consiuei the stake anu iights of 'employees', 'goveinment anu iegulations', anu 'civil society' (like iepoiteis anu news agencies as piessuie gioups). (uontielle, 2u12)Bunn, in hei ethical uecision-making, put emphasis to consequences iathei than moial piinciples like 'beneficence' which iequiies oiuinates to act foi goou of suboiuinates, be pioactive in benefit them, anu pievent haim when possible . Insteau, Bunn misuseu hei 'autonomous' position to saciifice moial piinciples of 'non-maleficence', 'fiuelity', anu 'beneficence' as well as human iights of piivacy foi ietaining the stock maiket stable. Accoiuingly, she must be subsciibeu to Capitalism coupleu with Consequentialism. Bunn knew that the piactice was not illegal, oi no geneially illegal, but she also knew it was not moial anu ethical. Bei ethical ieasoning was that she coulu hiue behinu the fact that human was limiteu to knowleuge an Egoism ieasoning thus she coulu justify the unethical behavioi of its thiiu-paity towaius hei goou goals by saying that she was not awaie of the wionguoing. Fuitheimoie, Bunn, as an auvocate foi shaieholuei's inteiest, acteu selfishly against otheis inteiests (focus of Egoism). In auuition to this, she along with the investigation team, ieigniteu the leak piobe to keep spying on the boaiu foi theii own inteiest It comes to conclusion that Bunn's appioach of ethical ieasoning lies on Egoism within the fiamewoik of Anglo-Ameiican concept. Neveitheless using uiffeient ethical stanuaius foi fuithei exploiations, Bunn's justifications aie also iefuseu thiough the lens of Rights anu }ustice theoiies of ethics. Ethics of Rights absolutely iefuses piivacy intiusion without the knowleuge anu consent; fuitheimoie, }ustice iefuses investigation of othei innocent membeis of the Boaiu of Biiectois. (Stewait, 2uu6) The Bp scanual ievels that Bunn's egoism coulu not auuiess accountability anu legal conceins foi global companies. Thus it is suggesteu that Bunn shoulu have taken the ethical theoiy of utilitaiianism (uontielle, 2u12) Accoiuing to the ethical issue, it is suggesteu an ethical uecision making mouel in which social consiueiation, stake iegulation anu iights of employees aie uesigneu.
#/,6/,+%! 2/'!,5+5#! &))$! The main ieason foi BP scanual can be founu in its coipoiate goveinance's ethical issues. Beie theie aie some incentives, which encouiageu them. BP uiu not have auequate policies, piocesses, anu supeivision in place foi investigation anu outsiueis. 1) Lack of tianspaiency. 2) Coipoiate cultuie issues such as mistiust anu conflict among some boaiu membeis S) Acting globally but no accommouation in coues of coipoiate goveinance foi accountability, anu legal issues. 4) Lack of inteinal anu outsiue auuit committees in investigation piactices. violation of Piofessional Coues of Conuucts by BP counsels anu lawyeis. S) Conflict of iesponsibilities among chief executives. 6) Bighei uegiee of ieliance between chief executives anu outsiue investigatois. 7) Lack of piopei stiuctuie anu guiuelines foi ethical uecision-making piocesses Insiuei Tiauing.
#/5#1$)&/5
Bewlett Packaiu hau oiganizational pioblems befoie the pietexting inciuent. This can be pioven by the fluctuations in the company's net eainings uuiing the ten-yeai peiiou that spanneu fiom 1996 to 2uuS, as well as by the leaueiship pioblems anu conflicts that also occuiieu in this time peiiou. These pioblems contiibuteu to the iisky anu unethical behaviois that the boaiu membeis engageu in uuiing the pietexting inciuent. The iesult of theii lack of ethical consiueiation uuiing this inciuent piouuceu stakeholuei backlash that impacteu both the company's peifoimance anu the caieeis of the boaiu membeis. This uemonstiates the piofessional impoitance of acting ethically, even when legal consequences aie not impacting the uecision making piocess.
In the eia of globalization, "coipoiate social iesponsibility is no longei optional business leaueis" while they aie encouiageu incieasing tianspaiency on theii social supply chain anu piomoting collaboiations with theii stakeholueis. In this eia of fiamewoik of coipoiate goveinance cannot suivive; otheiwise they iefoim anu auopt consistent tiiple bottom line (thiee stiategic piinciples aiounu sustainability such as economic, social anu enviionmental factois) thinking at the stiategic level of theii business management.
As the Bewlett-Packaiu case illustiates, the iesponsibilities anu expectations placeu upon coipoiate counsel aie incieasing. The cuiient economic climate coupleu with limiteu feueial goveinment iesouices, will place moie piessuie than evei on companies to affiimatively coopeiate with the Secuiities anu Exchange Commission anu the Bepaitment of }ustice in goveinment investigations. This enviionment suggests that coipoiate counsel shoulu ievisit the iules that guiue attoiney's behavioi in light of the incieaseu buiuens unuei which coipoiate counsel must now opeiate. It is cleai that meiely using ieasonable caie to iuentify what is anu is not legal is no longei enough to piotect coipoiate counsel fiom exposuie to investigation anu possible liability. To piotect one's ieputation anu caieei in this enviionment, foimation of both inteinal anu exteinal coipoiate monitoiing piogiams to ensuie compliance with both legal anu ethical obligations is incieasingly impoitant. Without such piogiams, the activities of a few bau actois can iesult in heavy fines, exposuie to inuiviuual ciiminal oi civil liability, anu loss of public confiuence in a company.
,"$0**"41+&'04
Coipoiate goveinance is the piocess of goal uefinition, supeivision, contiol anu sanctioning thiough which they ensuie the management is iunning theii coipoiation accoiuing to theii inteiest anu intension. The BP scanual mostly was a iesult of inauequate policies, communication anu supeivisoiy piocesses in place. With iegaiu to employees iights of piivacy, Stanuaius of Business Conuucts must ueteimine how, when, anu to what extent piivate uata about them aie ieleaseu to otheis to suggest the fiamewoik of 'piotect, iespect, anu iemeuy' as a guiueline to coipoiate iesponsibilities towaius its employees in which BP has iesponsibility to iespect human iights even when law is not enfoiceu, "anu shoulu iespect the ielevant inteinational piinciple of human iights even if national law is absent." With this iegaiu, BP has the obligation to iuentify anu manage the aieas wheie theie aie potential thieats to human iights by the means of 'impact assessment'. The communication piocess iequiies pioviuing auequate infoimation foi goveinment, shaieholueis anu society by impiovement of exteinal iepoiting mechanism anu social accountability thiough the piouuction of full social anu sustainability iepoit. Bp values anu belief to anu influence coipoiate goveinance to act ethically in futuie piactice. Fuitheimoie Bp shoulu communicate exact consequences of ethical conuuct anu intiouucing a iewaiu punishment system. Theie shoulu be a piopei supeivisoiy piocess anu coipoiate social iesponsiveness.
3&31&/2,+6.- SebasLlan, L. 8. (2011, March 22). !"# %#&'#(( )*+,*-. /*0# 1(2.3. 8eLrleved !une 6, 2013, from 1he LLhlcal roblem of reLexLlng: hLLp://volces.yahoo.com/Lhe-eLhlcal-problem- preLexLlng-hewleLL-packard-8104728.hLml?caL=3 SLewarL, 8. L. (2006). ueveloplng LLhlcal Leadershlp. 42056#00 7826.(*9'# :60(5(2(# ;8- /8-<8-*(# =("5+0 . 8ablnowlLz, . (2013). LLhlcal Leadershlp. !"# /8>>265(3 !88' 48? . Pesselbeln1, l. (2008). Leadershlp LLhlcs - 1ralLs of an LLhlcal Leader. >*6*@#>#6(0(2.3@25.# . donLrelle. (2012). P reLexLlng Scandal. %< 1+*6.*' .