Anda di halaman 1dari 16

Hey Everyone, The following is a testimonial that we received from one of our clients, who has agreed to let

us share his story. Michael La Mesa was in court, defending his moms home and was the first recipient of our new Competent Evidence Package. Please read on, to see his story and the Transcript from the court case: Hi MCI, Attached is the transcript from the hearing on November 18, 2013 regarding Hunt Leibert Jacobson's Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of Bank Of America NA. I made a copy and marked a few things on it (original is not marked) because some of the things I said were either not transcribed properly or were deliberately left out like when I told the judge this was a certified birth certificate with the Connecticut State Apositille on top of it. They did not include the words for the apositille. They called it a rubber stamp. Don't know how they can change that. You can use these comments to share along with the transcript. I wanted to point out a few things to help others understand what is going on in this court and how the judge treats me. The info you provided made the difference. Judge was denying everything until I asked my killer question using the C.G.S.A. 42a-3-203 reference you gave me. But, you will see the judge ended the hearing and ran out saying he will reserve his decision. The judge would not give me the chance to reference any other statues or to motion for dismissal for lack of standing. Danaher must have practiced his approach to trap me into a position of stating whether I am MICHAEL C LA MESA or not. He hammered me on the name from the beginning of the hearing until page 11 of the 12 pages of the transcript. Several places he said if I'm not the person, then he wouldn't have the proper party, (which he could then award to plaintiff because Defendant failed to appear.) He tried to corner me into admitting I'm not the "person" and if not, then I am practicing law on behalf of someone else which is a felony. He also said page 5 line 2: "If you're not the person who's the named defendant in this case, then you have no standing here." Once I got the certified birth certificate with apositille entered as evidence of the defendant, he stopped hammering me on the name (but that was at the end of the hearing). I will have to be ready to refer back to the evidence of the defendant being entered on the record in future hearings. If anybody else tries this, they better be ready for all the different angles the Judge used to try to get me to admit I am the birth certificate, and the serious implications he threatened me with if I'm not that person. Another interesting change of course for the court is Judge Danaher is trying to save Judge Trombley from his "Law oif the Case" ruling. page 2, lines 12 - 15: "well, lets assume for purposes of argument, Judge Trombley's findings, that the Note is original, stand. And I have to tell you, I'm not sure about that." Guess Danaher realized Trombley is in a deep hole for taking alleged evidence from an attorney without authentication from the plaintiff, entering it as evidence and ruling it's the original Note while ignoring my testimony it's not my signature and the document is materially altered on it's face. Then all three judges used Trombley's "Law of the case" ruling to deny every subsequent motion, objection, mandatory Judicial Notice and demands for Articulation of findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on top of that, they

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

continued to order me to answer the complaint and waive my remedies in the Conn Practice Book. Of all the nerve of those three Judges! Interesting that on page 4, Judge Danaher would not swear me in, but did say I am on the record, lines 9 and 10. Danaher did allot of talking. That's why I interrupt him so much. He is steering the case where he wants it to go, and does not give me a chance to get my position on the record. When he asks me a leading question, I change the subject to what I want to talk about. Gets the judge pretty mad. Page 10, line 12: "Mr. La Mesa, you have to listen to me!" Near the end, you will see Danaher showing his intentions. After denying my motion for an evidenciary hearing he says on page 11, line 17: "I'll review this and decide it based on the submissions that have been filed." and page 12 line14: "I'm going to proceed based on this submission to the parties," He had all intentions of awarding summary judgment in that hearing, but I guess I spoiled his plans. The judge finally acknowledged there are material facts at issue! Imagine,...... it took 21 months for him to finally see that. Think it had anything to do with C.G.S.A. 42a-3-203 which he convienently left out of his ruling to deny BoA's Motion for Summary Judgment? That was the reason he said he would reserve his decision and he run out of the court room before Counsel could present their case on their motion! The look on the attorney's face was priceless. She stoof there with her jaw on the ground wondering what just happened. The transcript doesn't give the feeling of how much pressure I was under with him yelling at me to answer his questions, and threatening me with a felony because I'm not who I say I am. And then he says he'll have the marshal remove me for interrupting him. I'll give him something to chew on. Next time, I will swear myself in on the record using my bible. Wonder how mad he will get then. I hope those you share this with get something out of it to help them. Thanks for everything, God Bless, Mike

(Transcript continued on next page)

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com

(888) 491 3741 info@mortgagecomplianceinvestigators.com