1 No 1
Universities and Left Review is a calculated risk. And since the success or failure of this venture depends on the degree of frankness which can be assumed between editors, writers and readers, it is proper that the nature of the risk, and the character of the venture, should be discussed in this first editorial. The post-war decade was one in which declining political orthodoxies held sway. Every political concept became a weapon in the cold war of ideas, every idea had its label, every person had his place in the political spectrum, every form of political action appearedin someone's eyesa polite treason. To recommend the admission of China to the U.N. was to invite the opprobrium of "fellow-traveller": to say that the character of contemporary capitalism had changed, was to be ranked as a "Keynsian liberal" or worse. Between the high citadel of Stalinist Russia, and the "welfarestateno-further" jungle of the mixed economy, there seemed to be nothing but an arid waste. In these tight compartmentalised worlds, buttressed by bans and proscriptions, suspicions and fears, supported by texts from Lenin and Stalin, mottos from Burke and Bagehot, protected by massive armies with nuclear stockpiles and mutually exclusive military pacts, British socialism suffered moral and intellectual eclipse. For most Labour theorists in this period discussion of socialism was equated with the claim that the Welfare State was British Socialism, realised: witness the New Fabian Essays (1952). Most Marxist discussion of socialism became the fabrication of slogans and definitions calculated to evade every crucial problem posed for socialists by the degeneration of the Soviet Revolution. It was inevitable that the post-war generation should identify socialism, at worst with the barbarities of Stalinist Russia, at best with the low-pressure society of Welfare Britain: a society in which creative, popular and intellectual initiative was at low ebb, bureaucracy particularly in administration, Trade Unions, and the nationalised industriesat full flood. The debate between those who clung to the slogans of the thirties and those who embraced the new orthodoxies of Welfare Britain, a debate which evaded the critical problems and the main frustrations of post-war society, appeared monstrously irrelevant to the post-war generation. Its very irrelevance flattered their apathy.. Given the feeble level of political controversy, and its internecine character, who could argue with the young intellectuals, when they saidthey are still saying it,
71 72 73 74
BUSINESS M A N A G E R : Roderick Prince Editorial Communications to The Editors, 41 Croftdown Road, London N.W.5. Tel. Gulliver 5371. Business Communications to The Business Manager, Magdalen College, Oxford. Articles for publication to The Editors, 9 Observatory Street, Oxford.
Editorial
Young people, have defected from active political engagement, not because, as they sometimes say, "there is nothing left to do" but because the tradition of socialist thinking failed to focus in any creative way the gigantic problems which do, in fact, remain. Stalinism bred a fear whose consequence has been that whole areas of contemporary life have fallen beyond the reach of our "political" commitment. Literature, art, are our feeling for the quality of life and the community in an industrial societythese have all been consigned to some a-political limbo. And yet, the paradox is that when socialist values lose their relevance for the total scale of man's activities, they lose their 'political' point as well. They become expendable. Without universal applicability, socialism is open to the persistent erosive pressure from dogma and compromise: it is slowly nibbled to death. Those who feel that the values of a capitalist society are bankrupt, that the social inequalities upon which the system battens are an affront to the potentialities of the individual, have before them a problem, more intricate and more difficult than any which has previously has been posed. That is the problem of how to change contemporary society so as to make it more democratic and more egalitarian, and yet how to prevent it degenerating into totalitarianism. This is only one problem among manya 'political* problem, in the narrow sense, and yet one which demands the energies, the 'engagement' of more people of the highest intellectual capacity, than have ever been recruited to politics before in this country. This is the central problem, today, for the Labour Party, as such, it is our problem. This is the breach, the beach-head, a small area of which Universities and Left Review is attempting to occupy. It proposes to do this in two ways. In the first place, by inviting contributions from well-known The informing belief authorities and less well-known writerscontributions The narrow gap left by the Marxism of the thirties which try to make some new mark in the interplay of in British intellectual life is now an open, gaping void. socialist ideas, contributions which offer their values Kingsley Amis, in his pamphlet Socialism and the and premises openly, inviting, not passive assent, but Intellectuals, has voicedadmittedly in a somewhat serious, critical The second way is to take disconnected and romantic mannerthe objections felt socialism at fullattention. stretchas relevant only in so far by most young intellectuals to participation in the as it is relevant to the full scale of man's activities: labour movement. The repliesthat of the New States- significant in so far as it is judged significantly man, claiming that the demonstrations of November by people only who, through their several particular inter4th marked the end of an era, or that of Reynolds ests, are working towards common ground. That is News readers pointing to the mere than marginal poverty the common ground of a genuinely free and genuinely which has survived into Welfare Britainare simply socialist society. We hope these people will become not good enough. Political movements are more than our regular readers, that contributors, and financial simple reflexes to particular issues or sets of issues: a supporters, that if in the London Area, they will try to "sustained socialist movement must be informed by take part in the Left Review Club, and that they will the belief that the moral imagination can still intervene give us that active support and assistance without which creatively in human history. every part-time journal must collapse. What is needed, therefore, is the regeneration of the This journal has no political 'line' to offer: it cannot whole tradition of free, open, critical debate. The so- have, for it seeks to provide a forum where the differcialist tradition ought to be the most fruitful and the ent fruitful traditions of socialist discussion are free to most stringent of the intellectual traditions: a tradition meet in open controversy. It tries to reach beyond any of thought and action, alive to the realities of our narrow sectional appeal in the search for new ideas contemporary world and sensitive to the pressures of and new writers. Can we bridge the gap between the ideals of equality and social justice which have the Thirties and the 'Fifties? Do new ideas, new distinguished it in the past. Only in this way, can the writers and new readers in fact exist? This is the socialist movement draw into its orbit the vigorous, calculated risk we take. If this Review can attract and active minds of the community, and symbolise serious attention and avoid the bankruptcy of labels through itself the intellecual and political ferment of a and pigeon-holes, it will have achieved the purpose for generation. which it has been started. with something of relief and something of regretthat politics was not "about them". Nevertheless, the age of orthodoxies has, once again, been outstripped by historical events. Hard as we try, we cannot turn back the course of events which forced de-Stalinisation on the Stalinists. Hungary is there to point the moral, and adorn that tale. Much as we would like, we cannot think our way round Suez back to that comfortable womb-world in which conservatives and socialists still held hands. The thaw is on: but the landscape is still littered with the remnants and the ruins from the political ice-age. Even after the certainties of Stalinism and Conservatism have collapsed the old orthodoxies have enough momentum left to wreck the world. The pressing need, now, is that socialist intellectuals" should face the damage which Stalinism and Welfare Capitalism have done to socialist values. There are hopeful signs that this is beginning to be done. In recent Labour Party "re-thinking", and particularly with the publication of G. D. H. Cole's Is This Socialism! and John Strachey's Contemporary Capitalism there have been some significant departures from the complacency of much post-war Labour thinking. Such re-thinking must go onand must begin at the beginningwith a clear, contemporary analysis of what the facts about contemporary capitalist society really are. For the Marxist left, there has been the tremendous upheaval caused by the Twentieth Congress of the Soviet Communist Partyan upheaval whose nature is discussed by Isaac Deutscher, K. A. Jelenski and E. P. Thompson in this issue.
THE EDITORS STUART HALL, 25, West Indian Rhodes Scholar, read English at Merton College, Oxford; now completing a thesis on The Novels of Henry James. GABRIEL PEARSON: 24, graduated from Balliol College, Oxford with a First in English Literature, 1955; now working on a thesis on Charles Dickens. Edited Oxford Poetry, 1956. RALPH SAMUEL, 22, came up to Balliol College, Oxford, as Domus Exhibitioner and graduated in 1956 with a First in Modern History: now at L.S.E., writing a thesis on the dockers of London, Bristol and Liverpool, 1871 to the founding of the T.G.W.U. CHARLES TAYLOR, 27, Canadian Rhodes Scholar, graduated with Firsts in History (McGill University) and Politics, Philosophy and Economics (Balliol College, Oxford); John Locke Prize in philosophy, Oxford 1956; completing a thesis on the theory of alienation, from Hegel to the Existentialists; Elected Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, 1956.
BUSINESS MANAGER:
H. D. DICKINSON is Professor of Economics at Bristol University. Since the war has published numerous articles and reviews, of which the most interesting for non-specialists are those on Problems of Economic Calculation in a Socialist Economy in the Review of Economic Studies. PETER DE FRANCIA studied art at the Slade and in Belgium; art critic, broadcaster; teaches at St. Martin's School of Art; a leading realist painter, he has exhibited at the Adams Gallery (1956), and has an exhibition due at Milan this Easter. E. J. HOBSBAWM, Lecturer at Birkbeck College, London; author of several important articles in the Economic History Review, reinterpreting Nineteenth Century labour movement history; Assistant Editor of Past and Present, author of Labour's Formative Years. K. A. JELENSKI, Polish journalist now living in Paris, has written frequently on many aspects of Eastern European affairs, including recent events, for several French journals, and also for Encounter. D. GREGORY; JONES, 33, graduated from the Architectural Association, 1950; town planner, Housing Divison of the L.C.C., is now working on the L.C.C. Brandon Estate project; Lecturer for WEA. JOHN MACKINTOSH, Graduate of Balliol College, Oxford, studied in the U.S.A., now Lecturer in History, University of Edinburgh; specialises in history of the British labour movement. ROGER MORGAN, former Chairman of the Cambridge Labour Club, is now completing a thesis on the German Labour Movement and the First International. DAVID MARQUAND, undergraduate, scholar of Magdalen College, Oxford, joint winner, Gibbs Prize, 1956; Chairman of Oxford Labour Club. RICHARD PEAR, Lecturer in Politics at L.S.E., has lectured in the U.S.A.; joint author of English Social Differences. JOAN ROBINSON. Among many important economic works Joan Robinson has published The Rate of Interest, Essays in the theory of Employment and The Economics of Imperfect Competition. She is reader in Economics at Cambridge University. E. P. THOMPSON, 32, Extra-Mural Lecturer at Leeds University, author of William Morris, Romantic to Revolutionary, co-editor with John Saville of The Reasoner (opposition journal in the Communist Party); left the Party during the Soviet intervention in Hungary, after being suspended for publishing the journal; is now preparing the New Reasoner. GRAEME SHANKLAND, studied architecture at Cambridge before the war, and afterwards at the Architctural Association; town planner with the L.C.C., associated with the South Bank project, lectures at the A.A. on Nineteenth Century architecture; broacaster on Swedish and Polish architecture.
LINDSAY ANDERSON has made several documentaries, including Thursday's Children, (awarded an Oscar in 1953; is now at work on his first fulllength film; freelance film critic, has reported the Cannes and Venice festivals for the Observer, and has written frequently in Sight and Sound and New Statesman. MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, 23, graduated from Wadham College, Oxford in Classics, now specialising in educational psychology; Former chairman of the Oxford Labour Club. CLAUDE BOURDET, a leader of the French Resistance, founder and Editor of France Observateur, the leading French left weekly (circulation 130,000). G. D. H. COLE, Professor Cole's two most recent books are The Post-War Condition of Britain and the Case For Industrial Partnership. Until recently Chairman of the Fabian Society, Professor Cole founded and is now President of the International Society for Socialist Studies. BASIL DAVIDSON, for long Chairman of the Union of Democratic Control; author of numerous pamphlets on foreign affairs and author of several books on Afro-Asian affairs (China Daybreak, African Awakening, etc.). ISAAC DEUTSCHER, author of Soviet Trade Unions (1950), Stalin: A Political Biography (1949), Heretics And Renegades (1955), Russia After Stalin (1953), The Prophet Armed (1954); is at present * completing the second volume of his life of Trotsky, The Prophet Unarmed; major articles published in such left-wing journals as Esprit, Temps Modernes, Partisan Review, Dissettf. 1
ensure financial stability, we shall have to double our number of subscribers. We hope that readers will help us to achieve the target we set ourselves400 by mid-April. To win a really large number of new subscribers we have to continue advertising. To do this we need donations urgently. Donations should be sent to the Business Manager, Magdalen College Oxford. Readers can also help the journal by using the enclosed circular to win new subscribers.
Georgi Lukacs is one of the most distinguished men of letters in EuropeMarxist philosopher, scholar, critic. He has been an active Socialist since 1919. He played a major role in the Hungarian Revolution, and was a member of the Nagy government. He is now under restraint in Rumania. Wolfgang Harden is a brilliant, young philosopher, who has played a leading part in the attempt to liberalise the East German regime. This month he was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for his "activities". These two men are distinguished Socialists, men of imagination and courage. Their detention is a wilful, unjustifiable tyranny. This journal gives its wholehearted support to every effort to help secure their immediate release.
The Editor apologises to authors and readers for the following errata. ERRATA: p. 1, col. 2: In a few copies the authorship of English Social Differences is wrongly attributed to R. Pear. p. 9, col. 1, line 2: free social relations. p. 9, end of col. 3: Robespierre for Robsepierre. p. 9, col. 2, line 38 should read 'It increased enormously the potential political capacities . . .' p. 10, col. 1, line 9: initiators for imitators. p. 10, line 28: after 'modified it' add footnote: "Trotsky made the original predictions in 1926-9. In this essay the term Thermidor is used as Trotsky used it at first to signify a veiled counter-revolution, the originators of which belong to the party of the revolution and are unaware of the consequences of their action. A critical survey of Trotsky's use of the term will be found in The Prophet Unarmed, the forthcoming and concluding volume of my biography of Trotsky. p. 11, col. 1, line 23: for role read rule. p. 36, col. 1, line 14: delete line 14 "a commander . . etc." p. 53, col. 2, line 40: delete line 40. p. 54, line 13: delete asterisk. p. 54, line 28: for Lyonel read Lionel.
SIMMONDS
UNIVERSITY BOOKSELLERS Our shop is not the biggest in London, but it is amongst the best. And it's a place where you will obtain individual attention. We carry most current books on History, Sociology, Economics and World Affairs as well as an intelligent general stock
16
FLEET
STREET
UNIVERSITIES AND LEFT REVIEW CLUBOPENING MEETING Isaac Deutscher introduces discussion on Russia in Transition. THURSDAY, 5TH APRIL, 8 P.M., ROYAL HOTEL, WO BURN PLACE, LONDON, W.C.I. Coffee, beer and spirits will be available. Admission 2/- (Members 1/-) Club membership (5/- p.a.) to the Hon. Treasurer, 19 Carlingford Road, N.W.3.
BOOKS RECEIVED
In addition to those reviewed in this issue, the following books have been received and will be reviewed in the next issue.
DOROTHY MARSHALL
RAYMOND ARON
Ibn Kaldunfs Philosophy of History (Allen & Unwin, 25s.) The following have been postponed to the second issue for space reasons.
ARTICLES BRIAN MANNING
C. WRIGHT MILLS
The Club will hold twenty-four meetings a year. At each Club meeting the author of one of the articles in the current issue will re-introduce the subject; the The Power Elite (Oxford University Press, 36s.) greater part of the evening will then be taken up with readers' discussion and criticism. The Club is designed E. P. THOMPSON to focus discussion arising from each issue. It will help William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary (Lawrence & Wishart, 50s.) to create a close relation between the journal and its readers, apart from providing discussions interesting in S. LILLEY themselves. Automation Club meetings will be held in comfortable and in(Lawrence & Wishart, 21s.) formal surroundings in the Royal Hotel, Woburn Place, A. J. TOYNBEE London, W.C.I. An Historian's Approach to Religion Coffee, beer and spirits will be available. (Oxford University Press, 21s.) All readers in the London area are invited to join. J. MCCORMICK Admission to meetings is one shilling for members and Catastrophe and Imagination (Longmans, 25s.) two shillings for non-members. The first series of Club meetings will be held every ED. T. MCKITTERICK AND K. YOUNGER Thursday, from 4th April, except for Thursday, 18th Fabian International Essays (Hogarth Press, 18s.) April. The first series will include discussions introduced by EMRYS HUGHES Isaac Deutscher, G. D. H. Cole, Eric Hobsbawm, Keir Hardie (Allen & Unwin, 18s.) Lindsay Anderson and Peter de Francia, E. P. Thompson, Graeme Shankland and David Gregory Jones. MORRIS GINSBERG All readers in the London area are invited to join Essays in Sociology and Social Philosophy the Club now. Membership cards, five shillings for a 1. On the Diversity of Morals year, and further information can be obtained from the 2. Reason and Unreason in Society (Heinemann, 25s. and 21s.) Hon. Treasurer, 19 Carlingford Road, London, N.W.3.
DISSENT
Readers of this magazine will be interested in DISSENT, an independent Socialist quarterly published in U.S.A. Winter 1957 includes: C. Wright Mills answers critics of "Power Elite", G. L. Arnold on British Socialism, Irving Howe, Benno Sarel and much else. Editors include Irving Howe, Lewis Coser, Norman Mailer, Erich Fromm, Sid Lens and A. J. Muste, and amongst other recent contributors have been Isaac Deutscher, Ignazio Silone, Czeslaw Milocz, Harvey Swados and Richard Hofstadter. 3/6 ISSUE, 13/- P.A., FROM 111 COURTENAY AVENUE, HARROW, MIDDLESEX.