MUSIC
AND THE MIND
Iffil
THE FREE PRESS
A Divisioll of Macmillan, ille.
NEW YORK
Maxwell Macmillan Canada
TORONTO
Maxwell Macmillan International
NEW YORK OXFORD SlNGAPORE SYDNEY
I'99
t,1 "v -
.L L c
>-,
O!UGINS Af-.Jll CdLU:CTlV F FUNCTiONS
It will never be possible to establish the origins of human music
with any certainty; however, it seel1ls probahle that music de-
veloped from the prosodic exchanges between mother and infant
which foster the bond between thclll. from this, it became a form
ofcommunication between adult buman beings. As the capacity for
speecb and conceptual thought developed, music became less
important as a way of cOllvcying information, but retaincd its
significance as a way of communicating feelings and cemcnting
bonds between individuals, especially in group situations. Today,
we arc so accustomed to considering the response of the individual
to music that we are liable to forget that, for most of its history,
music has been predominantly a group activity. Music began by
serving communal purposes, of which religious ritual and warfare
arc two examples. It has continued to be used as an accompaniment
to collective activities; as all adjunct to social ceremonies and public
occasions. We share these functions of music with pre-literate
cultures. In Ollr society, one cannot imagine a Coronation or a State
funeral taking place in the absence of music. We know less than we
would like about what musical activities went on in the past in
private houses; hut it is important to recall that the modern concert,
in which instrumental music is performed in a public concert hall as
a separate entity unaccompanied by voices and in the absenc:: ofany
ceremony, was not a prominent feature of musical life in England
until the late seventeellth century. Since then, music as a distinct
form in its own right has continued to grow in importance. During
the same period, the pen()fJllCf has become more slurply differ-
entiated from the listener. The individual listener's response to
III mil' is a principal theme of this book.
2]
MUSlc- !\Nll'IIII'. MIND
storofmany other'projective
'11 a subiectIS lIlciucedto
same smdcllts ofpanlting to
ubtl'theirimaginations by at dal1lD-staillcd walls
iCl1ly tosec
m;lllllLT of
particular piecc of mllSlC IS
atthetil1le; :llldsOllie part
from tile proJcctioll ofhis
1emotions soklY;l dircctcOllseyucllCL'
;IC
a noverbal or refcrence
f()r its ownsake, It IS not sllrpnsll1g
care sometimcs different rcsponses to it. What 1S more
is the degree ofconsensLls. In spite ofthe difficulties
earlier, \"'C can be t:1irly confident that listeners to great
,IC whichis fllniliartothemareusuallysharingaclosely
eneneC',
ornc writers suggest that music conveys the same llIeaning to
l'relltlistencrsmoreaccuratdythanaverbal11lessage; tlutmusic
likely to be misinterpreted or v:lriously interpreted than
rds. Theepigraph to this chapter is ;111 extract from a letter by
ndclssollllin whichhecontinues:
worddot's not meal! the tlJlng to one person as to
thetuncS;IYS thesalllethillg, awakensthesallle/(:dlllg, in both
that fl'l'linl!: maynotbeeXDn:ssnlIII the words.')
'list speculates along SlIl11Iar li11l's, I ofa
Icert, variolls Illembersofthe
am what \vcrc their words. which like every hUI1lJIl and cxtcrllal
word left Ille so indifferellt, comp:ucd WIth the hC:lvenly ohrase of
YllllSic with which I h,ldJust heen cOllllllulling? I W;lS
who, bllcll fro[ll the illl'brianng bliss ofP,iLldisl', subsides
7
0
\I
SON(;S \\'ITIIOUI W()HllS
Illtothe Illl'S! hUllldrlllll reality And,JlIst;15 n'n,lllllTl'atllrl's:m.: tlil'
I.lstsurvi\'illgtcstllllOIlY to,I tl>rm oflifcwhichll,ltlln:has
Iwonderedwhether1ll1lsi,-1I11giltnotbethelIn](llIl'c,a IIIplvof wi Lit
have bCL'l1 - i(thl' ill\'l'l1tlOll oftlllgll,lgc, til<' formatioll of
the an,liysls of idcas had nor illtcrvcllnl - the 1l1l';IIIS of
tOlllIlIUllic.HIOIl bet\vl'cllSOliIs. Itis liked th.ltiI;l.' COllll'to
nothing;ilullJ;miry hasdeveloped;dollgotherhill'S, thoseof
,lilt! written hllguagc_,,,
Itis dC;)f thatbothProust
are refl'rring to music
Western
tLlditioll. COJ11IllUIlICltioll bet\VTl'1l
possible if
share thesallle culturealld he11(,(, the
sameloudof Illllsic.
Iluwl'vcr, 111 .I differcnt context, soullds without words call be
accurately interprcted. Iftwo people conduct ;1 'conversation' by
hUlllming, withoutpartingtheirlipsorusingwords, agooddealof
information GIll beconveycd, stichas 'Iam weary'; 'Ialll pleased';
orevcll 'I love you'. The prosodicclements speech CUI
wi tholltthesylltaetie, evenhetweellaclults froll) differellt elll tures,
becausethesoulldsmaderd1cctbasichUI1l<l1lelllotionsandhaveHot
elaborated intodifferellt varieties ofIlIllsic. SOl1le composcrs
vc bcclJ particularly aware ofthe prosodic aspects of
JlIl;icck systematically recorded the melodiccurvesofspeech; and
hecalled 'speech melodies' relllailled (emraltohis Illethodof
composItion.I'
It Illust always be remembered th;tt clllotiollal aroLlsalls partly
that clllotions overlap and call change fi-Olll olle
easily. Critics may agree that a p.1
workof artis 'SIgnificant' becausetheyfInd
interestcd; and are likely toagreein general terms
work is tragic, humorous, prot{lUlld or superfIcial. llut deLliled,
oCtheirsubjcctivereactionsmaydifferCOil sid-
erably.
There is a good ex.lInpk in BCrIlsteill's Harvard knurl'S. Hl'
ukestheopeningharsof Beethoven'sPianoSOIl,ltain Etbt,Up.3I,
1
No, 3, and asks vl/hether we listellers arl' hea what lkl,thovcn
supposedly felt whcn he \-vrotc them. Bernstcin thcn verbalizes
wiut Bccthuvell's IIlLlsic nLlkcs him
terms of pleading
alldeqll ailsV.!CL
71
MUSH :\NIl Till: MIND ':,ONes WITII( lUT w( ll{l IS
I'lc:ISl',l'k;hC . 11I1I]'IOIC you . rlltlo.! If , Y l'S; but ]
!)Il cnl.llIl cOllditi'H)s.
LTl1stcill thell
But, did lk"thoVl'1l kcl all that, or .lllythin[!; like n? I )Id IJust make
lip tht'se tl:dillgS, out ufthl' hlut', ur .In' the}' to "ome degree related
to lkcthu'.'l'n's teelings tLlIlstt-rred to me through IllS !lotes? Wc'i1
IIl'Vl'r know, Wl' can't phollc him up: bur tIlt' probability is that botiz
arc trUl". And If so, Wt' havc jllSt disc()\'en:d ,\ Ill,qur ambiguity .- :1
hC:lUtltltllll'W st'lll:lIlnc ,lI11hi\!uitv to .!dd to our t:Ist-growing lis(' t:
lkrustein's proJcctions tcll llS more ,lbollt Bertlsteill tklll
f,.Tthovl'll. [f I had to put words to Becthoven's phr:1ses, I should
U.OOSl' diflcrcnt olles. But that is unimportant. We certainly share
tllC pern:ptioll that the llIitial COlItT;lsting phrases of this sonata are
1st ill terms ofqucstlOll and answer, and recognize that
jA.Sl'S this pattcrn eiscwhl're. For example, Bcethoven
",notatcs the opcning phrases of the tlll.lk of IllS last string quartet
3:\ III r major) by writing 'Muss es scin) Es muss sein! Es
.uss selll"
answer IS so ;J patterll in humall
we h:lrdly recognize it ,lS snch. In these two
is distillilH.! the essence and answer III
lWusic without words. Although I disagree with some of
$chopcnilaller \vritcs abollt IlILlsic, I Clli appreciate his rdi.:rclIcc to
M\uslC ,IS expresslIIg 'thc illner nature, the ill-itsdC of every
fllclIonwnoll' .
[n The
.ftaturcs of
tersollal
l$eethovclI IS
P.1l.1 ,1IlSWLTlllg
\(itl'rprl'tatioll ill
repn'scnts thc deepest essential
to know all
portLlycd, [n similar Clshiol1,
trolll till' particular. lilat lS
terms of :l pkadlllg lIltlTchange between indi-
Vidll,t!S C,H1SL'S llIollll'l1L1ry unease, as he would have been the first to
,-lpreci,ltl', Ikl'thovclI's mastcrly gCllcraliz,Jtion should not be
i'ltcrprcted ill tcrllls of' plln'ly lIeeds, We arc bOllnd to
brillg om prejudices ,\Ild fcclinp with LIS whcn wc approach a
1
work; hm it is the extcnt to which a work
thV
person,II which makes it
Dcryck Cooke, in Thl'
4MIISi{, ,lttcmprcd to show that
within the Western
is COllsenSllS betwecn COl1l-
posers as to
arc llscd to represellt partlnilar
of the llJ:ljOr third COllllllOllly
millllr third IS gcnerally associated with
called bv mediaeval theorists ilitlbo/lls
llsed by coIII posers to
or otl1cr Ilorrors. Cooke's cX:l1llples of its
llsC include works by Mozart, Wagner, Liszt, Berlioz, GOllnod,
BUSOIll, and lIlallY others. I don't think th:1t :llIYOIlC reading
could {;Iil to bc convinccd that there is a good deal 111
says; but there are also so many exceptiolls that his vinvs
have hcen sharply criticized, Moreover, Cooke cxplicitly
discussion to European art lIlllsic which IS
cl1lotiollal cft(xts of music arc morL' dependcllt UpOIl
contcxt, less upon pmcly musical devices, than Cooke allowed.
Eduard Hanslick, the famous Austrian critic
pilloried as Beckmcsscr in Dit' JHl'isfcrsil1gl'r, pointcd out
lIIelody of (;tuck's 'Chc faro sellza Eundicc' might be
Jolly if we did not know tlut the aria is reAecting
The French carol 'Quelle cst cettc odeur agr0ablc, lkrgcrs qui
as a bcautiful! y tClIder llldod y wllL'n
sung as ,1 carol; but the tllne serves as .1 rumbustious drinking
song, 'Fillcvery glass', in The HI:I!.\!ur's Opera, Therl' is a poillt ill
'Offertorio' of Verdi's ReqlliclII at which the te1l0r, plcadlllg to
grantcd eternal litl" sings sOIlll'thing sllspiciollsly like 'Au pres
ilia blonde'.
expericllced listeners agree that Mozart's String Quilltet ill
(; minor, K. 5J 6, is a predominantly tr;lgic IlListl'rpll'Cl'. But sOllle
people fl'cl that the last lIlovemellt expresses JOY bCl'311se, alter its
adagio introductio1l, the key challges to G and the time
sign;ltllrl' to 6/R. Howcver, the Mozart scholar, Alfrcd Einstein,
to this last movelllent as beillg ill 'the (iIsconsolatl' major that
MOlart utilizes ill so mallY ofllis last works', '.1 thus that,
/i.)r hilll at allY rate. the change to the major key continlles the
tragedy than lightl'lIing it,
72 73
MUSIC ANI) TIlE MIN!)
I k-ryck Cooke dcfllH:d l11u:.ic 'the suprelllc expressioll of'
universal emotions. in all c!1tirdy persollal \vay, by the great
composers'.ll However, it is !lot a direct of those
l'lllotions \vithin llllllsclf which 1l1OVCS the listener but rather the
way in which a great composer transforms universal
Il1to art.
So mallY musiCians and critics have wrestled with the problem of
the llleaning of music. that some 11:lve aballdoned allY attempt ;Jt
lillking absolute IlllISIC with human The 'formalists' or
'non-refcrentialists' consider that musIC IS an entirely :ll1tOl1omOllS
art; that works of music bave no mcamng outside themselves; ;l1Id
that the experienn: induced by hearing ;1 \\fork of lllusic is cntirely
consequence of the listener's appreciation of irs structUf<..',
Hanslick attempted to maintain this position. Hc wrote:
so many bouks Oil III uSlcal acsthctlcs. all of vvhich ddined
the nature of music in tefms of the '!'eelintis' It arOllses, and which
ascribed to music a definite expn:ssive capability, had long excited in
lIle both doubt and oppositioll. 'rlle 1l,ltUre uflllllsic is cvell harder to
tix withill philosophical categories than pallltll1g, since ill lllllSIC the
decisive conccpts of'fonn' alld 'nmtenr' are illlPossible of
denec and separatioll, If Dill' wishcs to attrihut" a definite nlIltCnt to
purely instrumcntal music ill voc,lllllusic content derives from the
poem, not from the lllusic - thell OllC Illllst discard thc
of the musical art, in whICh no Oil(: call lkmonsrr:ltl' a 'content'
distillct from the 'form', nor evell deduce it. On the other hand, I
readily agree that it is idle to speak of absolute lack of content in
instrLIIllentallllusi,', which my opponcnts accusc Ille llfhaving (Iolll'
in my treatise. How is onc to distinguish ,cielltitically in musIc
betweell inspired !ClfIll and Clllpty form? I had the former in
III y opponents accused llle of th,' latter. "
By admitting the notion of inspired fl)flll versus cmpty t<mll
Hanslick is, 1 think, partially retreating from the formalist
position. especially with his Lise oftlw \vonl'elllpty' l(form has to
contain something, what it contains must surely have '>(lIlll'
signiticance.
Stravinsky ftllll1d himsclfin rather the saml' position when, in IllS
conversations with Hohert Craft, he was discussing his
74
\()N(;S WITHOUT WUHDS
relllark 'Music IS powerks:-. to l'xprcss anything at all.' Stravinsky
strongly objected to the notion that a picce of 11111Sic is a
tr.l11scendcntal idea expressed in terms of l1lllsic or that tlwrt' was
;lIIY exact correspondence hct\vcl'l1 the composer's teelings and
he set down in notes. Stravinsky did adlllit that ';1 composer's
work is the embodimL'nt of his but emphasized that, for
the important fact about J composition was that it was
sOl1ll'thing Ill' \\! , 'heyolld what can be called the composer's
feclings', He said that 'A Ilew pil'cl' of music is a new reality'; Jnd
'Il1USIC expresses itself', Of the composer he claimed: 'All hl'
Knows or (ares about is the apprehension of the contour of the
form, for the form is evcrythlllg, He can say nothing whatever
mcanings.'
It IS possible to appreciatc StravinsKY's point of view without
agrccment. A great deal of gushing nonsense has been written
about the mcaning of music; but when Stravinsky expresses his
dislike orth\' music of Richard Strauss by calling it 'tre;1Cly' he is not
to its form but to its expression of sentiment. 17
Hindelllith agrees with Stravinsky in so far as he writes:
Music callnot exprcss the composer's feelings. ,Here is what he
docs: he knows by expericnce that certain patterns of tonc-
setting correspond with certain emotional reactions on the listener's
pJrt. Writing the patterns frcquently ;ll1d tinding his obscrvations
confirmed, in anticipatlIlg the listcner's reaction he believes himself
to be in till' saml' l1ll'lltal situation,
Hindemith docs not deny that music induces clllotion 111
audicllce, but he regards the composer as a skilled manipubtor who
'believl's that he feds what he helieves the listener feels', I')
Hc continues:
l\ COlllposer call never be absolutely sure of the elllotionaleftc'ct of
IllS IlltlSlC on the listeller whell Ilsing complex lllJterial, but by
experience ami clcver distributioll of this material. morcover with
fr('quem refercnces to those lllusical progressions that cvoke the
lll1COlllplicarcd fedill(!-images of sadness or gaiety ill an ullJmbigu-
75
:
;
c
.
.
.
:
;
.
.
.
.
-
:
:
;
'
-
'
/
0
:
.
;
.
.
.
.
'
S
:
.
;
.
.
.
.
c
.
.
c
.
.
>
J
'.
o
:
-
>
-
-
'
f
:
)
'
J
'
j
\....,
J
.
.
-
'
f
.
;
;
.
:
:
:
'
f
,
;
:
.
,
.
.
.
.
:
.
;
,
.
.
.
"
i
:
'
- o
'
-
'
'
-
'
(
':
!
;
:
:
;
"
:..)
"
-
'
:
)
:
:
:
:
'
f
.
'
J
'
,
,
.
.
,
"
"
0
"
'"
':
:
/
'.
.
.
.
,
"
D
>
"
:
.r
.
.
!
:
!
.
.
c
-
:
:
;
o
r
.
.
g
:
;
'
)
'
"
:
;
'./'.
:
;
.
.
'
j
;
.
-
..r
.
<
f
.
:
.
;
>
-
.
'
:
.
.
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
f
.
"
"
:':
:
J
.
.
.
,
:
:
Q
.
.
.
W
.
.
;
.
.
z
'
J
1
,
2
.
;
.
'..J
E
'
"
'
'
-
'
:
.
.
>
'
I
z
<
:
f
.
.
:
;
:
:
;
;
-
:
.
;
'
"
,
/
,
'
-
'
f"
"
"
'
:
;
'
-
=
c
.
.
:
;
'
-
'
:
...
r
;
;
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
c
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
<
~
.
.
.
.
,
~
s
:
r
:
.
"
'
:
"
1
Z
r
:
~
~
:
~
~
'
"
'
:
;
'
.
.
,
r
,
c
.
.
.
r
.
>
z
/
-
z
,
-
MUSIC ANI) Tllf' MIN!)
teach To represellt terrible and
thingsIS initsclf.lIl111stillctforpOWl'r;lndllugniticl'JlCt:
111 an he docs not fear thelll There IS no such thing as
art- Artaffirms . Foraphilosophertosay, 'thegood
alld the beautiful arc Oill" IS infamy: ifheg()('s on to add, 'also the
trtle,,Olleoughttothrashhim, Truthis
Wt' possess,lrt lest weI!crish oftlu' tmth. 'J
Nictzsclw's vicw oflifc, ill spiteofhis awareness ofits hOfwrs, is
esscntially affirmative; whereas Schopenhauer sees 110 hope but
denialanddetachmcnt. As WaltcrKaufmannputsit:
Nietzsche envisages 'the sublime as the artistic conquest of the
horrible'; and he celebrates the Greek 'who has looked with bold
eyesilltothedreadfuldestructiveturmoilofso-called
as well as into the to
orto'a Buddhist ,reaffirmslIft' with
thecreationofworksofart.u
Sothe([cationof traged y is bothan:sponsctothehorrorsoflife
Jndawayof masteringthem. Fromtragedy,itis possibletolearnto
appreciate life as sublime in spite ofthe suffering which living
Nietzsche makes llS understand why it is thatcven tragic
theslow movement ofthe' Eroica'
111ere
ill whichwearesaying'Yl'S' tolifeasitactuallyIS: tragic,
ecstatic, painful, andjoyful. The essential theme ofThe Birth
T/'agcdy is Nietzsche'sperceptionthatart makessenseof theworld
andjustifiesexistence.
Nietzsche realized- no one more vividly- that theonly life wt'
knowis constitutedbyoppmites. Pleasureisinconceivablewithout
withoutdarkncss;lovt: withouthate; goodwithoutevil.
In
111
become
includes tragedy; wLy it must embrace trage(ly as
triumph; v,'by thedcnialof suffering is thellCg,ltioll oflifi:itself.
/\ IU<.,1 II !('/\IIUN Of IXIS II'NCI
t1ut tTl';H1Vt' prOll';,;, was
more ,';,pcci,dlv, by ill-hL'alth, v"hl'thn
!l1l'lltal. tit: wlluld h,l\,C apprcciati.:d 1ll00lem views which 11I1k
h,lbillty to IlLlllic-deprl'ssive illness with crcativity t, Nietzsche
:1S;1 chalkllgc\vhichoughtto a person's
by overcomillgadversity thata hllll1:1l1 being can
hlS true potl'llti,tl. Ikilleputsthesl' wordsinto the l110mh
lastsLll1Za
Diseasew;\:-, dll' mostbasic
(}f Illy cr,:,It!\'l'ul'i-!,e and"tiTS:;:
Creating, Icould
Creating, Iagalllgrewsound.'-I
those varietIes of philosophy which
solutions to the prohkms of
Tht'llunmsciousdisguiseof phYSlOloglclllll'edsIIllderthecloaksof
theubjl'niv('.ilka!,purdy goesto
often I havt' ,I"kl'd III ysclfv>,heth,'r, takinga largevinv,
11:1S \1\)( hCl'n merely all interpretation ofthe hody alld a misrlllticr-
',otiy. t,
indigestion, insomma and
hun
up
pmtc'ssorship :It the Ul11vcrslty ot Base! at till' age ofthirty-four
bC'l';lllSC ot'ill-health. III spite' ofthIS, he wrote to (;L'org Brandl'S
'Myilllll'sS ILlS becll mygrcatestboon:1t unblocked1I1l'. it gavellll
the COULlg\.' to be lllYSl'If.'II, Illness also had the c(lcct ofparti:dl')
Nict7schc called IllS TilliS Spo].>,
I y)
I\NI) 'IIII' M[NI)
Ni("t:lschc's (',meLTll to l1lCrgc A Dioll),si.m
SChopt'llhaucr's obsl'rvJtioll that
In tht' course of litt: head and he;lrt grow mort' ami more :qun;
more :lIld lllOrt their
I
Nietzsche\ inslstcllce Oil t'xpenI'IlCl' ,IS
eXistence is ttcpendl'llt on
tive: more cspcClally, 011 linking mind
wrlttl'n my works with my whole
Will to I>Oll'fI', Nlctzsche claims that art has a direct dtl'ct Oll bodily
experience, alld that this is why it is life-affirming, even when its
subject-matter IS tragic.
In The Gal' S(/(,II((" Nietzsche wrote
Alld so I myself: What is it that Illy whole body really expects of
music? I believe, its O\VIl ('{/SC: as if :Ill allimal fUl1niom should he
cas y, bold, c<Llbcrall t. self-assured rh ychms; as ifiron,
kadt'n lit\., should be gilded by gout! golden and ll'ndcr harmonics.
mdallchol y wants to rest in the hiding places and abvssl'S of
that is why I need music. .,'
Glvell tillS vi('w of art, It is !lot slirpnsillg that Nietzsche repudiated
Christi:mity. Nothlllg could be furtiH.'r from hi" VISi011 than the
Chnstiall picture of a he.! Vt'll in
vvith harp and song. alld from
bCClll'ntircly
s I:" ib
insistence 011 the orsoul over
label sexuality as nilL I Ie 1)l'hevL'd Sllpl'rlOr
to cOlllroL III aster. 'Ill<ltt' their instillctll,d dnves:
did not think to ab,lj ish thl'lll or reg.! rd
like freud, thollght that it W,15 to dClly
that repression of the kads to crime ,111<1
III Thlls Spoke /.,lI'a(/1IIsl"'l, Nietzsche has;1 St'ltiOll
lksplsn:-.
if,..?,
.A JUSTlrH :ATION Of EX1STFNCI'
'I :un body and SOIlI' so till' dllid. And why should one not
like childn:n)
But [he awakened, the cnlightelled man says: 1 am body entirely,
and nothing besIde; Jnd sonl IS Ollly a word for in the
body.
The body is .1 great mtelligence, a multipliCIty with olle Sl'llSe, J
w;u and J peace, a hnd and a herdsman.
Your little intelligellce, my hrOlhn, \",hich you 011 'spirit', is abo
an Instrument of your hody, a little instrument and toy of your great
intelligence.
Ynu sa y T and you arc proud of this word. But greJtt:r thall this
YOlL will not believe in it - is yom body and its great
illtl'iligellce, which dol'S not say T hut performs T. 04
Nietzsche would have agreed with John Blacking's observation
music's essential proccsses arc found in the constitution of
body and in patterns of interaction of bodies in society.
N letz5chc's description of the effects of music in The Will to POlVer
ccilo<.:s Blacking's account of the commu11ally litt'-cnhancing effect
Venda national dance.
All art exercises the power of suggestion over the muscles and
s(,1lses, \vhich in the artistic arc originally active: it
31ways speaks only to artists - it speaks to thIS kind of;l subtle
l1exibility of the body .. All 3rt works tonicallv. increases
inflames dc,irc (i.e., the of
enhancement of lifi: enhances man's pOWl'f of COml1H1I11catlOl1, as
well as his powt:r of understanding. Empathy with the souls of
others IS originally nothing mural. but .l physiological
(() suggestion. . Compared with music all cOllllllunicatio1l by
words is shallldcs'i; words dtlute and brutalize: words
words make the 1IllCUmmOll common.
In The Hirth Tral!cdy, N inzsche l'lllphasized the illabili ty of the
pOl't to express the mllcr spirit of mllsic, and, at the same time,
attributed to music a special significallce rather simibr to that givell
It
reJlder tlll' COSlllH,' symbolism o[
music. s(;lnd" ill sVlllbolIc r,'l.ltiol1 ttl the
IfJ}
:
:
:
r
.
(
;
,
'
J
:
'
,
:
;
:
-
~
;
>
~
z
~
:
:
:
-
,
>
:
.
r
<
'"
..-
::
-
-
!
~
~
-
,
r
~
',
/
,
~
N
r
,
r
,
~
/
'
V
.
t
'
,
~
;
:
.
.
.
.
'
<
~
'
<
'
r
:
'..r
:
-
:
T
o
z
~
.....'"
~
"
<
C
-
T
-
i
~
~
.
,
.
.
r
,
;
,
-
.
,
r
:
'"
"
"
"
"
'
:
l
.
r
-
:
~
]
'
2
t
;
/
.
r
:
~
E
'
f
"
"
I
:
:
.
.
.
:
:
:
'
J
:
(
"
';
lVII..) /\1'" IffI It I'IIII! \j l (
nor w'ithout means of order1llg and
exprl..'SSlllg Nil..,tzsche's l'IlH1j1.lsis upon the DiollYS-
Ian elemcntsin Illllsic nced to
Imposeon1eruponIllS musical
matterthatN thoughtthatWagner's
robbed mUSlC of'its wmld-transfigurmg, afttfllutive
Whatdocsmatteris that Nietzschebelievedthatthemusicofother
composerscouldhave \vorld-transfiguring,afttrlllativccharacter.
Itseemstomethatwhatis unusualandparticularlyworthnoting
in Nietzsche's thol1!!:ht music first, that he rccognized
onetolifebutcould
a meansbywhich thc passions'enjoythemselves '; notas escapist,
or other-worldly; but as an art which, by life as it is,
transcendsitsessentialrragedy,
Second, he recognizcd that lllUSIC was physically and emotion-
ally based: it was rooted in the body, and Dionysian, however
this essay.
Dionysianfutureofmusic',n
Third, he understood that lllllSic linked the two principles of
ApolloandDiollysusin thesamewayas tragedy. ChristianityIud
attempted to b'lJlish I)ionysus from art; but, 111 music, Dionysus
bebornagainill
ofthl>Ik'xtgenerationget\vhatIgetout
of all utterly lIew ndtllrl' There arc times
whell everything thatis left overand CJnllot be gLlsrK'd ill t.nmsof
musical relatiolJs;\ctll,l11y fills Illewithdisgustandhorror
3
.'
perceptionofmusic,lS so that itCIIJ
ins
I()()
< , J \..' " ! 1 \ I" );. t" ! i '" "I
right that they should be concerned with raising standards uf
literacy, with increasingexpertisL' in both SClL'nces ;llld crafts, with
mcnand\\'Olllell withtheskills tocarll,I lIving
increaslIlgly dominated by technology But ,1 'hight'!
not make life itselfworth lIving. Thearts