Anda di halaman 1dari 7

Correlation Analysis

Correlation between Stress and Extraversion


r -0.623
12.0

N 150

Significance ***

10.0

8.0

Extraversion

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

Stress

Correlation between Stress and Anxiety


r 0.663
12.0

N 150

Significance ***

10.0

8.0

Anxeity

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Stress

Correlation between Stress and Tough mindedness


r -0.702
12.0

N 150

Significance ***

10.0

8.0

Tough Mindedness

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

Stress

Correlation between Stress and Independence


r -0.675
12.0

N 150

Significance ***

10.0

8.0

Independence

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Stress

Correlation between Stress and Self Control


r - 0.697
12.0

N 150

Significance ***

10.0

8.0

Self Control

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

Stress

Inter-correlations
Stress Extraversion Anxiety Tough mindedness Independence Self Control -0.623 *** 0.663 *** -0.702 *** -0.675 *** -0.697 *** -0.526 *** 0.650 *** 0.618 *** 0.616 *** -0.497 *** -0.543 *** -0.426 *** 0.658 *** 0.657 *** 0.668 *** Extraversion Anxiety Tough mindedness Independence

Overall Findings Correlations There were a lot of significant correlations found within the data. The various assessment instruments all had correlation with the other variables on the specific assessments. Within the variables being measured to find specific correlations (the Job Descriptive Index facets, the Job in General, the personality factors, job tenure, and job performance) there were a few significant correlations. Job Descriptive Index. This measure did not reveal any significant correlations to job performance on any of the scales. This assessment had negative correlations on the Work on Present Job scale with Factor O Apprehension (r = -.41, p < .05), and the global factor of Anxiety (r = -.38, p < .05). The Pay scale had negative and positive correlations. Pay was negatively correlated with Dominance (r = -.36, p < .05) and Independence (r = -.43, p < .05). Pay was positively correlated with Rule-Consciousness (r = .36, p < .05). It was also negatively correlated with the global factor of Artistic (r = -.38, p < .05), Social Control (r = -.37, p < .05), and Creative Achievement (r = -.41, p < .05). Opportunities for Promotion had a positive correlation with Rule-Consciousness (r = .36, p < .05) and negative correlation with Independence (r = -.42, p < .05) Artistic (r = -.37, p < .05), Social Control (r = -.37, p < .05), and Creative Achievement (r = -.41, p < .05). The Supervision scale had negative correlations with Factor E Dominance (r = -.36, p < .05) and global factors of Independence (r = -.44, p < .05), Artistic (r = -.38, p < .05), Social Control (r = -.39, p < .05), and Creative Achievement (r = -.41, p < .05). Personality and Job 42

People on Your Present Job (Co-workers) had a negative correlation with Factor E Dominance (r = -.45, p < .05), Q4 Tension (r = -.36, p < .05), and global factor of Independence (r = -.41, p < .05). Job in General. This assessment instrument was negatively correlated with Factor E Dominance (r = -.44, p < .05), Q4 Tension (r = -.36, p < .05), and global factor of Independence (r = -.40, p < .05). Job Tenure. The length of time on the job was negatively correlated to the personality factors of Factor H Social Boldness (r = -.40, p < .05) and positively correlated with Factor O Apprehension (r = .37, p < .05). Job Performance. The Job Performance Evaluation total score was correlated to various personality factors. Performance was positively correlated to Factor C Emotional Stability (r = .47, p < .05), Factor F Liveliness (r = .50, p < .05), and the global factors of Realism (r = .53, p < .01), Self-Esteem (r = .48, p < .05), and Leadership Potential (r = .53, p < .01). Job Performance was negatively correlated with Factor I Sensitivity (r = -.42, p < .05) and the global factor of Social Sensitivity (r = -.41, p < .05). The evaluation score was also positively correlated with the Positive Affectivity scale (r = .48, p < .05

Anda mungkin juga menyukai