by
MATTHEW L. SMITH, MAJ, USA B.S., Unl ted States MI 1 I tary Academy. 1976
88-3193
es a r;pnrmnO Thread of e L
Exist. ' 3
Approved by:
, J r . , M.A.
Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the v i e w of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College o r any other government agency. ( w n c e s to th is study should include the foreaoinq statement . )
ABSTRACT
LESSONS LEARNED FROM 20TH CENTURY TANK WARFARE DOES A COMMON THREAD OF LESSONS EXISTS: A hlstorlcal analysis of the lessons learned concernlng the major tank warf lghtlng experlences of the 20th Century by Major Matthew L. Smlth, USA, 112 pages. Thls study Is an hlstorlcal analysis of lessons learned concernlng tank mobility, flrepower, protection. c m a n d and control, and overall design during the malor tank warfighting experience of the 20th Century. The alm of thls study was to make a determlnatlon concernlng the exlstence or non-exlstence of a common thread of lessons learned durlng Individual and small unit (company size or smaller) tank flghtlng. The major tank warfare experlences examined were World War I, World War 11, and the Arab-Israeli 1967 and 1973 Wars. The lessons learned were gleaned from sources written by soldlers, englneers. and hlstorlans who had elther participated In o r studied the particular tank warfare experience. Lessons are grouped into flve areas: mcbillty. flrepover, protectlon. command and control, and overall design. This study concludes that a c m o n thread of lessons learned concerning Individual and small unlt tank flghting does exist throughout the major tank warflghtlng experlences of the 20th century.
111
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1.
Introductlon Hlstorlcal Background Research Questlons Slgnlflcance of the Study Methodology Chapter 2. Survey of Literature
1
2 3 4 4
7
9 14 17 21
1967-1973
Wars
Chapter 3. Lessons Learned f r m Past Tank Warfare Part I Part I 1 Part I 1 1 Chapter 4.
22
1967-1973
Wars
38 55 86 87 89 91 94 98 101 105
M o w I i ty Fl repower Protection C a m a n d and Control Overall Deslgn Chapter 5. Conclusions and Recommendations
3ibl iogrdphy.
iv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of thls study I s twofold: to research the malor tank warflghtlng experlences during the 20th century wlth the alm
century and has documented shortccmlngs or deflclencles concernlng moblllty, flreparer. protectlon. comand and control and overall design In the partlclpatlng tanks and tank forces. These shortccmlngs and deflclencles. or 'lessons learned,' wlll be the
.
focus of thls study. After a .thorough examlnatlor: and cmarlson. a determlnatlon regardlng the possible exlstence of a c m o n thread of lessons wlll be made.
_.
HISPDRICAL BACKGROUND
Tank warfare was lnltlated durlng the later part of World War I. Tank forces were developed to break years of battlefleld
stalemate by defeatlng the effects of the machlne gun. and restorlng tactlcal moblllty and declslve maneuver to the battlefleld. Whlle the tanks' slgnlflcance durlng World War I Is
debatable. tanks would rapldly evolve Into the centerpleces of every maJor 20th century land army. Most tank battles that occurred In World War 1. World War
11. and the Arab-Israel1 1967-1973 Wars have been studled and
lessons learned concerning Indlvldual tank and small tank unit moblllty. flrepower. protectlon. c m n d and control. and overall deslgn have been ldentlfled and documented. Sources for these documented lessons learned are numerous and have been prepared by persons of dlverse backgrounds, lncludlng soldiers. englneers. and hlstorlans.
No slngle source, ldentlfled In thls research,
focused solely on lessons learned nor attemped In Its scope to compare or llnk lessons learned frm more than two of the major tank warflghtlng experlences of the 20th century. Whlle It can be
..
.. .. .
..
canparlson of the lessons stlll needs to be conducted to determlne Uhether a carmon thread of lessons learned exlsts.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
tank warflghtlng concernlng Indlvldual tank and small tank unlt moblllty. firepower. protectlon. ccamand and control, and overall des I gn?
(2) Does a c0rmK)n thread of lessons learned exlst?
fleld a danlnant tank, and daninant tank forces, for Its mound maneuver forces. Tank forces are the centerplece of US ground maneuver forces and thelr success or fallure m a y well be the decldlng factor in future hlgh-lntenslty confllcts. I f a cannon thread of lessons learned does exist, It can be used to establlsh a base llne for current and future tank development and also can be used as part of thefoun-datlon'for the development of tactlcs and tactlcal manuals concernlng tank--force organlzatlon and e m 1o m e n t
frcm World War I through the Arab-Israel1 1967 and 1973 Wars.
CHAPtER 4-- ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
to other works and to the base of knowledge. Suggestlons for future research are also Included.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
The purpose, background, and slgnlflcance of thls thesls have been establlshed In thls chapter. Addltlonally. the research questlons and the study's methodology are Included to provlde the reader wlth the study's dlrectlon and content.
In the next
chapter the reader w l l l be exposed to the sources of knowledge used to ldentlfy the lessons learned frcm 20th century tank
warf lghtlng.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
a synopsls of Information avallable relatlng to tank warfIghtlng, doslgn. and lessons learned. The review of llterature for thls thesls conslsts of books and perlodlcals concernlng tank warfightlng. evolutlon. deslgn. and capabllltles. The sources range from those wrltten durlng World War I to the present. The Canblned Arms Research Llbrary at the Unlted States
Army
Leavenworth, Kansas, provlded the foundat ion f o r document Ing the thesls. The research materlal used In thls thesls Is unclasslfled. The revlew of llterature appllcable to thls thesls Is dlvlded Into three sectlons. Part I examlnes llterature concerning lessons learned from World War I. Part 11 examines
consulted and Is Included In the blbllography. sources were the most beneflcial.
The following
PART I
- WORLD WAR
BOOKS
of the Tpnk
In the
US.
tanks fraa 1919-1940. Steadnan examlnes the evolutlon of US tank design. mllltary force organlzatlon. and mechanlzed doctrlne. from the beglnnlng of World War I to the start of World War 11. He
also provldes an excellent dlscusslon of the political Issues and other factors that Influenced US tank evolutlon.
In -fare:
A W
v of
In 8
, wrltten by
Kenneth John Macksey, the history of the policymakers and strateglsts Is examlned as It relates to the technlcal and tactlcal development of tanks. The work examines the development of armor and the key factors in the tank development process beginning-vlth World-War I.anU endlng.vlth the Vletnam War. R.M. Ogorklewlczs work, D e v e l o u w of F19hLlnq
m. provldes a detalled
of armored flghtlng vehlcles and deals In depth wlth the many dlfferent aspects of armor deslgn. Including guns, mlsslles, englnes, steering. and armor protectlon. Ogorklewlcz discusses
descrlptlon of the lnternatlonal development of tanks In the context of evolving tactlcal systems. Hogg examlnes the Interplay
I t focuses on tank
warfare In North Africa, Italy, the Sovlet Union, and France and
llsts many lessons learned from speclflc battles.
R.M. OarkIewIczs
of tank design In several countries, lncludlng the US. Soviet Union, Brltain, Japan, France, and Italy from the beginning of the
10
many lessons learned and explalns how tanks were modlfled to Incorporate them.
of, n a e W
wrltten by Trevor N.
Depuy, provldes a datalled examlnatlon of tank warfare In World War I and provldes many lessons learned. Depuy provldes many battlefleld facts and statlstlcs about the employment and engagements between tank forces. Thls source contalns a good dlscusslon of the Battle of Cambral.
Swlnton provldes InformatIan about what he observed, heard, and knew about World War I tank flghtlng and development. The work
counter It. An excellent source for US tank development ana.varfIght:ng lessons learned i s The P a t t u n e r s
, by Martln
Blumenson. Thls source contalns Patton's written correspondence about World War I tank development and flghtlng and has many facts and lessons about how the US Tank Corps was establlshed and how it fought.
11
work,
conducts an excellent study of the blrth and evolutlon of armored warfare doctrine and technology throughout the 20th century. Dyster takes a detailed look at World War I. the Interwar perlod. World War 11, the early atanlc age, and the present. He examlnes
several natlons' strategles and polltlcs concerning the development of their tanks and tank forces.
A good source for studylng tank warfare at the operatlonal
theory and practlce of tank warfare, fran the flrst conceptlon of an armored vehlcle to the establlshment of the tank as the prlnclpal offenslve weapon of modern land warfare.
12
PERIODICALS
Brlgadler General Samuel Rockenback provldes a detalled dlscusslon of World War I small tank unit tactlcs In hls artlcle 'Tanks and Thelr Cooperatlon wlth other Arms: Rockenback
detalls what tanks, Infantry, and artlllery forces learned tactlcally from World War I flghtlng and how future comblned a m teams must flght on future battleflelds.
13
PART I 1
- WORLD WAR
I1
BOOKS
In,-
study the development of US maln battle tanks fran World War I1 throught 1980. Thls source provldes a detailed dlscusslon of how
US maln battle tanks were modlfled durlng thls perlod and how the
US tank development system works or does not work,
Zaloga and
Loop conduct a very obJectlve analysls of US tank development and dlscuss deflclencles and who should be blamed for them.
graphlcs. narratlve. and maps. 32 battles In whlch tanks played a danlnant role. The book centers on World War I 1 and dlscusses the Impact of armor on warfare. prbnciple of war. The most crltlcal examlnatlon of World War performance Is provlded by John El I Is In hls book Icks deflnes the tank Idea" as a
I tank
m .
thorough dlscusslon of how vulnerable and unreliable World War I 1 tanks were.
14
1 -
PaDerz. Hart's
provldes the reader an excellent lnslght of tank flghtlng In the desert and has wrltlple levels of lessons learned ranglng frao the slngle tank to dlvlslon and army level lessons.
Llddell Hart agaln provldes the reader wlth valuable
Slde of the H I I L .
Through
what the Germans learned about World War I! tank flghtlng and provldes a basls for German tank development and tactlcs. Mar as I Knew It, by George S. Patton Jr., can be consldered the best US source for lessons learned concernlng World War I 1 small tank unlt tactlcs. Patton provldes many lessons about how tanks should be employed and how cunblned arms operatlons should be conducted.
Tom Wlntringham's Starv of
.
and
'h3Lc.s I s an
excellent source of muitl-natlonal lessons learned. Wlntrlngham establlshes the tank flghtlng lessons learned for each major power of World War I 1 and llnks some lessons to earller armored warfare.
15
lessons learned by the Allles and AXIS powers. every facet of tank flghtlng and deslgn.
and Pollce. by Hoffman Nlckerson. contalns many general or overall lessons learned concernlng World War I 1 tank warfare.
f lghtlng.
Battle
16
PART I11
- ARAB-ISRAELI
BOOKS
The transcrlpt of the brleflng 'Impllcatlons of the Mlddle East War on US Army Tactlcs. Doctrine. and Systems'. by General
on protectlon.
'Lessons Learned frm the Mlddle East Crlsls', a memorandum wrltten by the Offlce of the Asslstant Chlef of Staff for Force Development, was the best suurce of detalled lessons learned fran tank flghtlng In the Mlddle East 1973 confllct. The memorandum provldes lessons learned for all aspects of tank flghtlng and development.
Herzog's work
focuses on the macro-level of the wars and several overall lessons about tank crew tralnlng and tank employment are provlded. The best US source for technlcal lessons learned and lndlvldual tank lessons learned Is Walter 3 . Henderson's paper 'Analysls of the Lessons Learned In the October 1973 Arab-Israel1
17
W a r :
lessons and relates how they have Impacted on the US Marlne Corps. He also establishes what lessons would not be applicable to US forces.
Ernm
War to War:
The Arab
- Israeli
concernlng what the Israelis learned and how they have changed strategy and tactlcs based on thelr past experlences.
Qn the Brinks of the
W. by
lessons learned about tank flghtlng In the Slnal durlng the 1973 October War.
tanks need or already have that permlt tanks to survlve and wln on the battlefleld. Additlonally. It provldes a detalled account of
the entlre Israeli campaign in the Slnal. The best Israell source of lessons learned about the 1973 October War I s Oavld Elazar's Blltarv Asnects af the
18
PER1OD ICALS
C.N. Barclay provldes several general lessons about
leadership. morale and the effects of technology In hls artlcle 'Lessons fraa the October War,'
&my,
Is on lessons that made a slgnlflcant difference on the battlefleld. The artlcle, 'Tank Myth or a Mlsslle Mlrage.' nllltarv
the gulded mlsslle can effectlvely neutrallze a tank attack and that the tank has lost Its dunlnance on the battlefleld. The best perlodlcal sources for 1973 October War lessons are provlded by Jac Weller In hls artlcles. 'Tanks In the Mlddle East.' Eilltarv Revlq, Hay 1976 and 'The Flght at Suez,' Elatlonal
Defense. September-October
learned ranging :ran iecnnlcai !essons:dDout the ianKs' a m e r plants and welghts. to more general lessons about tactlcs and procedures developed to defeat anti-tank mlsslles and overcome obstacles. The artlcle, 'The 1973 Hlddle East War: An Englneer's
Vlew,' lke M I 1 ltarv E n ,
19
devlces and procedures were developed to counter these obstacles and restore moblllty. Brlgadler General Avlgdor Kohalanl's artlcle, "Defense of the Golan.' Dlltarv Rev&. October 1979, provldes an excellent
analysls of the vltal lessons learned about how the Israelis conducted their defense of the GoIan Helghts durlng the 1973 October War. Kohalanl focuses on the Importance of terraln and
how the defender should mesh hls defenslve posltlons wlth natural and man-made obstacles. He also dlscusses other general lessons
of tanks.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
The base of knowledge of tank warfighting and evolution is large and dlverse. The books and artlcles llsted In thls chapter
serve as the basls for Informatlon concernlng what soldlers. englneers and hlstorlans have learned from past tank warflghtlng. The next two chapters of thls study will provide a llstlng of the lessons learned and an analysis of the lessons learned gleaned from these sources.
20
CHAPTER 3
Thls chapter provldes the reader wlth a llsting of lessons learned from 20th century tank warfighting experiences concerning tank and m a l l tank unit moblllty. firepower, protection, connand and control, and overall deslgn. The lessons learned will be derlved through an examination of llterature concernlng major 20th century tank warflghtlng experiences and gleanlng what soldiers. engineers, and hlstorians have learned and documented about tank warflghting and overall performance. The major 20th century tank warfighting experiences that will be studled are World War I. World War 11. and the Arab-Israeli 1967 and 1973 Wars. This chapter will.Se dlvided.1nto three.parts:.?art 1 World War I, Part I 1
- World War
- Arab-Israeli
Wars. Each part w111 further be divided into five areas: mobility. firepower, protection, comnand and control, and overall design. Under each area the reader will be provided with a list of lessons learned speciflc to that area and period of tank warfighting.
21
PART I
- WORLD WAR
World War I can be characterized as a confllct in which technology domlnated tactlcs. Technologlcal advancements such as the machlne gun. the rallroad. and the telegraph ccmblned to deny an attacker tactlcal and strateglc offenslve moblllty. The caubatlves. after a qulck race to the sea. settled Into thelr trenches, erected thelr barbed wlre fences and began four years of bloody. In-declslve trench warfare.' Almost Imedlately. the Brltlsh and French began looklng for a way to restore battlefleld moblllty. On September 15. 1916. durlng the Battle of the S m e . the Brltlsh Introduced the tank to the battlefleld. The French followed In August, 1918 by
introducing tanks during the battle for Amiens. Initially. German
tanks and not to pursue German tank development, but after further study. the h i g h corrwand decided that tanks were needed. In 1918.. the Unlted States followed the Brltlsh and French lead and developed its own tank corps. The World War I lessons learned concernlng tank and small tank unlt moblllty. flrepower, protectlon. c m a n d and control, and overall design are listed in the pages that follows.
22
Obstacles
The maJor man-made obstacles used to deny tank moblllty were dltches, land mines. barbed wlre and concrete blocks.= Tanks wlll need the capablllty to cross elght-foot-wide trenches and surmount four-and-one-half foot vertlcal obstacles.a
and several Inches In front of the longltudlnal center to ald In spannlng tank dltches: Tanks will need fasclnes (an enormous bundle of wood chalned together) to be dropped Into trenches to help tanks cross. Tanks will need to be able to climb a 45-degree Incllne. The tanks track w i l l need long grousers (cleats) to climb steep
s l lppery hlIIs.&
Tanks are unsuitable for moving over wet..she!l-churned. ground. Tanks are not capable of crosslng battleflelds that have been torn up by lntenslve artlllery bombarahent. Artlllery can make terraln Impassable to tanks by causing large craters, destroylng natural drainage, and causlng water to f I I 1 the craters, whlch can cause tanks to bogsg The abillty to cross through barbed wlre Is chlefly dependent on the presence or absence of angles that are llkely to
23
hook and hold the wlre. When wlre becanes hooked, a tank's moblllty beccmes a westlon of the amount of wlre and Its strength agalnst the tank's p0wer.O Tank moblllty was slgnlflcantly improved by the development and use of an 'undltching beam' that could be fixed to the tank's tracks making self-undltchlng posslble.'O
24
-shorter road usage times.'* The prlmary objective Is not hlgh road speed, it Is superlor moblllty. Superlor moblllty requlres a very materlal reserve of power over the need for average condltlons. Thls can be done by providlng ample horsepower per ton, at least 20 horsepower per ton. A reserve of horsepower wlll also Improve rellablllty and protect the engine fran excesslve depreclatlon and reduce need
for overhauls.1a
The tank's suspension Is the keystone of vehlcle efficlency. The suspenslon needs to absorb vibrations. bumps, and shocks caused by the.roughness of. the terraln. A tank's 3uSpenSion needs to reduce bounclng and rocklng and cause the hull to move in a stralght llne In splte of rough terraln. Suspenslon deslgn shoul d have: -eight to twelve polnts of support(roaciwhee1s). -equallzatlon (bogies. levers, or cables).
-elasticity (rubber road wheels. springs. buffers).
25
Tank track I s superfluous and undeslreable for travel Ing long dlstances on good roads. A tank needs to have the dual capablllty of travellng on roads uslng wheels and cross country uslng tracks.I7 Tank track must be wlde enough to glve an adequate supportlng surface In relation to the aggregate weight of the vehicle. Ground pressure may be the determlning factor as to whether a tank wlll get mired or pass over the terrain.'O
Ransc
Tanks need to travel longer distances prlor to refueling. Inltlally, a tank's range was only 20 mlles on roads and only 12
26
FIREPOWER
Tank armament should conslst of one antl-tank cannon and three to four machine guns lnslde the turret and one to two machine guns outslde the turret.2o
A tank's
reasonable ranges, the armor of hostlle tanks that it w l l l most likely encounter. Weapons must have some margin of safety, for there may be llttle or no opportunity to change armament after the enemy has thickened his armor.zi The maln gun needs to be effectlve agalnst Tanks need as many machine guns as possible."
Tanks should have rotating turrets to enabie them to fire in all directions wlthout having to change the directlon of movement. The turret must rotate quickly and must be tightly fitted to the
A tank needs multlple turrets to permit firing in two
directions simultaneously.2"
27
hostile fire The most important protection for tanks lies not In thelr
matter how thick the armor used, the enemy can employ a gun to pierce it.
against any sort of projectlle from any weapon that a single soldler can carry about i n Its complete form.a9 Tanks are highly vulnerable to the direct fire effects of artillery.ao
Tanks can prevent numerous casualties through their ability to rapidly overcome strong defenses and to rapldly decide battles. Crews should be protected from the heat and fumes of the engine.
28
The crew compartment and englne should be separated and a means of puttlng out englne flres should be provided."= Tanks need an effective interior fire extingulsher system.'" Dangerous projections lnside the turret should be minlmlzed and p a d d e d . ' . The tank's entry and exit methods are poor and rapld evacuation Is Tanks need to have at least two
than one hatch Is hlghly improbable."* The tank's fuel supply is vulnerable to enemy flre. The fuel supply Is stored lnslde the hull and when ruptured fuel can
f l l l the hull and the entire tank could catch flre."
The fuel
Tanks need infantry, artillery, and air to be successful. Working alone they suffer greater casualtles.39
29
The aritlsh. French, ana OS'Dellevea that tanks met more than thelr match In contemporary antl-tank guns and therefore tanks could only be used In close llalson wlth Infantry and art I I lery.4n Tanks need artillery to suppress antl-tank guns. A battery s recQrmended.*' per 1000 meter front i Tanks need to have airplanes detalled to assist thelr maneuvers by augnentlng artlllery flres and provldlng Informatlon concernlng enemy and frlendly posltlons. A ratlo of one plane per
1000 meters Is recumnended.*=
The best alr defense for tanks can be provlded by attached antl-alrcraft units:"
When tanks are employed In small numbers thelr effects are less and thelr casualtles Increase.** Tanks are most effectlve when employed In depth and on a narrow front. Tank units need to have a reserve to exploit success.*3 The rullng factor for tank success or fallure I s the selectlon of the terraln tanks are requlred to cross.** Success depends on preparation. best terraln and select exact r o u t e s : ' Tanks are an offensive agent for overcomlng stubborn defense, for 'breaking the square.Y4e Leaders need to pick the
30
The ability to exploit a successful attacx is ilmited by the tanks' speed, range and rellabllIty.** Tanks should not attack at nlght.sa Attacks should be
llmlted to daytlme due to llmlted vlslblllty restrlctlon lnslde the tanks.3i Dawn 1s the best t h e to launch an attack. Tanks
should concentrate the night before and attack at flrst 11ght.3* Wlthout the concealment of mlst/smoke/nIght, slow movlng tanks can easlly be defeated by dlrect artlllery flre or speclal
. super-powered
antl-tank r l f l e ~ . ~ ~
The best defense agalnst a tank Is another tank.=* When tanks attack, they need to suprlse the defender to be successful.
The employment of smoke Is more lmportant than potent shell. them.=& Do not use tanks as artillery pleces. It is a waste of thelr ~ a p a b l l l t i e s . ~ ~ When tanks meet the enemy. they are decIslve.se
Tank Intercwrmunlcatlon Is poor.3p Tanks need radlos to control thelr movements and flres.La Tank crews need Improved hand and arm slgnals to asslst In controlllng thelr movements and flres." Tanks should have flags
31
for vlsual slgnals. Orange is the Dest flag coior. then red. A protected opening should be provlded to allow flag slgnals when the tank is buttoned up or under flre.-2 Success depends on the tralnlng level of crews and unlts. Tanks, Infantry. and artlllery need to traln together." Tanks should have map boards.c* Tanks should have a dlrectlon lndlcator to asslst In navlgatlon when buttoned up.*'
Tanks allow llmlted observatlon from Inside.** Observatlon slits should be made of lamlnated glass that can easlly and qulckly be replaced when d a m a g e d : ' Due to llmlted vlslblllty. tanks cannot hold ground.Lg The wearlng of gas masks Interferes wlth the efflclency of the crew. All openlngs In the crew coznpartment should be made tlght so that a sllght Increase In alr pressure can be built up through the use of a power-operated blower that puts outside air through a gas protection fllter and dellvers It to the crew compartment.LP
32
Wear and tear and not enemy flre dlsables the majority of tanks. 70
A contlnuous supply, maintenance. and salvage system I s
A supply tank
Ities
A tanks aeslgn should be based on its f~nction.~ A
tanks tactical purpose is the flrst fundamental in !ts origin.7L Tanks should be able to stop, start, and turn suddenly and qulckly wlthout harm to the crew or vehlcle. Controls should be
handlly located, easy to understand, operable with sllght effort, and rellable.77 Tanks should be as qulet as posslble and free from characteristic noises that would distinguish them from other types
of motor vehlcle~.~
33
In
peacetime equlp the armored force wlth cheap and smaller tanks and plan for a change over when the fear of war looms and the natlon's purse strlngs loosen.7p
Trees
A ground army needs two types of tanks. One type, to work
with Infantry. must be heavily protected with emphasis on flrepover. The other type, to work wlth cavalry, must be llght and fast wlth emphasls on range and moblllty.a2 Speclal tanks wlll be needed:
-A flame-gun tank will be needed to burn out
plll b0xes.O"
34
-A mlne
counter mlneflelds.n4
- A bridge tank o r amphibious tank will be needed to
counter defenslve posltlons establlshed along rlvers. canals, and trenches.0a Tanks are selge warfare weapons that serve a speclal purpose. breaklng the trench stalemate.OL
Human factors need Improvements. The lnterlor of the tank Is not comfortable. Inslde It Is very hot, the alr I s bad and
by the crew to flrc the armament. Gunnerdguns should not interfere wlth each other. Gunners' firing positlons must be level and free of obstructlons. Gunners take less space standlng than sitting ar ciouching.Po Crew size depends more on armament than anythlng Falrly canfortable crew seats should be provlded for travellng purposes.9o Tanks are not able to store personal gear and addltlonal equlpment needed to sustain the fight. Space must be allotted for; -amnun1 t Ion
35
-food. water
-gas protectlon devlces -spare parts and lubrlcantsea -tank baslc issue ItemseZ Tanks should have accesslblllty. They should allow easy access to all lubrlcatlng points, engine/transmlssIon bolts, wlrlng. batterles. and power traln elements. Assembiles should be removable wlth the greatest practicable ease and wlth mlnlmum disturbance to other parts.9"
Production
The most potent limltlng factor for tanks s the dlfflculty
I t can take
The weight and slze of a tank must always be the minimum practicable. A large target, of great weight, Is not desirable.*& Weight (31 tons) caused tanks to ditch easlly in the Flanders' mud.*'
36
The use of a diesel engine improves fuel economy and reduces the flre hazard.9o
spite of long wear and rough treatment.99 Tanks need to be more durable wlth fewer defects. There Is a contlnual need to replace heavy pleces of machlnery and tank
37
PART I 1
- WORLD WAR
I1
World War I1 can be characterized as a global war Involving multiple fronts, diverse battlefleld terraln, extreme and divergent weather condltlons. and numerous forms of battle ranglng
38
o.tshcb
Tanks are of little use In the process of clearing a way through a mlnefleld.loa Tank mobillty can be restricted by enemy Infantry defending
frm bullt-up areas along high speed routes of advance. Tanks can
not fleht effectlvelyln bullt-up areas and must Walt for Infantry to clear t h e m z o 4 Tank tracks can tangle with wire fences causing many tanks to throw or break track.IoS There Is no such thing as "tank country.' Some types of country are better than others, but tanks have and can operate everywhere.loA Terraln can severely hamper mobllity. In some battles,
nearly half the t a m s became bogged aown m e to unsuitable terrain. In European terrain. mud Is one of the great dangers and the velght of :he tank i s its own worst enemy.
!t
was not
u n c m o n for tanks to churn themselves lnto the mud untll only the turrets were v I ~ l b l e . * ~ ~ Artlllery barrages can churn the ground and make I t lmpassable for tanks.soP
39
S~OW.'~*
Speed In exploiting the surprlse will allow tanks to defeat other tanks that are superlor In protection. armament and numbers.'1o
Armament
The value of the maln gun changed from being an infantry support gun to the additlonal role of 'tank busting."'*
40
Because of tank-proof defenslve posltlons. tanks lost thelr shock effect and their flrepower capablllties Increased In Importance. Tanks had to be able to flre effectlvely at any range
up to the
Features
Tanks need 360-degree flre capabll Ity. Tanks should use rotatlng turrets to provlde It. The llmlted traverse of the maln
gun on the M3 General Lee was a grave Tanks.score a b1g advantage by belng able to shoot and hlt the enemy at a range at whlch the enemy could not hit back.LLP In European terraln. a tank is not often seen at greater ranges than
800 yards.
41
wlll wln.lza
Tanks need a main gun stablizer to permit a shooting on the move capablllty.1a4 Tanks with a 'fire on the move' capability
have a demorallzlng effect on the defender because movlng tanks are harder for the defender to hlt than statlonary tanks.1zs
t hostlle
Lk.e
~ I e ;o-aetear. 3'
.inri.-canKguns'are d
concenrrarea. armor
punch. To survive, tanks have to spar with anti-tank gun positlons. When tanks encounter uperior flrepower. their
tank.
27
42
The airplane has the capabilltles to be the tank's deadllest foe.'ao Moving tanks are harder to hit than stationary
by
- main
ki 1 I s .
Tanks were hlt by thelr opponent's weapons as follows: all hlts were In the tank's hull.
Approximately 45% of all turret hlts caused the tank to errupt in flre and canpletely burnt out the vehlcle.saa Approximately 60% of all hull hlts caused the tank to erupt
43
The average number of cremen kllled Approxlmately two to flve per cent of
crewmen deaths were caused by burns. Approxlmately 209: of crewmen casualtles happened whlle the crews were off thelr tanks.sa7
Tanks alone can not break through a prepared defense. Tanks need to flght Integrated wlth other arms.s3s The key t o success f o r tanks and Infantry Is close cooperatlon. Infantry Is needed to provlde essentlal antl-tank
protect 1on. I 19 Tanks and lnfantry that do not traln together wlll not be able to f l g h t together. Co!nbIned lnfantry/tank tralnlng should be part of Army education."O Close cooperatlon between tanks and aerial forces is essentlal. ComrmnIcatIon must be establlshed between forward
ground tanks and a l r squadrons to enable alr support wlthin mlnutes. The airplane 1s the best tank-support auxlllary.'41
Tanks' success hlnge dlrectly on the ablllty of artlllery to destroy antl-tank guns. Spllt second adjustments of artlllery flre can spell the dlfference between vlctory and d e f e a t . ' ' =
44
Fleld artlllery forward observers need to travel wlth tanks. Keep the same members of a combined a m team fighting together.
Primary mlsslon of armor Is to attack Infantry and artillery. tanks. The enemy's rear Is the 'happy hunting ground' for
Tanks should lead Infantry when the terraln permlts rapld advance and the enemy's antl-tank defenses are weak. Infantry should lead tanks when the terrain restricts movement and flrepower or the enemy's antl-tank defenses are
The only.,vay t o successtui1y;fight motor!zea formations is wlth tank formations.14e Tanks should avoid occupylng Isolated groups of trees In oDen country because the enemy wlll lnvarlably tarset them wlth artlllery and alr fires. Tanks should dlsperse In open terrain.'** Because of Improved anti-tank weapons, tanks can no longer expose themselves for long periods whlle wlthln range of antl-tank
45
weapons. Tanks need to seek out the cover and concealment provlded by the terraln and only expose enough of the tank to permlt flrlng.lSn The superiority of defenslve flrepcuer can be sharply llmlted by the ablllty of the attacker to concentrate suddenly and In m e a t strength agalnst any part of the defenslve posltlon.lsl The tank does not fear the anti-tank gun; the tank fears the cDncealed anti-tank gun.1sa A concealed antl-tank gun Is worth four tanks."" Anti-tank guns are virtually lnvlslble to tanks and endless opportunities exlst for ambush and surprise. Tanks flghtlng In urban streets are at a serious dlsadvantage. Tanks should not flght In urban areas because: -limited ammuntlon wlll not permit suppression o r destructlon of all llkely antl-tank posltlons. -tanks cannot clear enemy Infantry from rubble o r rulns. -tanks wlll be In short grenade range of enemy lnfantry hldlng In bulldlngs along streets.IS4 Use of captured tanks can be dlsastrous because of: -no replacement parts.
-different atmnunltlon requlrements.
-different weapon ranges.z33
Tanks should never attack were the enemy expects them to come.1sL Tanks need to use thelr moblllty to strlke the enemy
46
using the longest way around or the lndlrect approach. Tanks should advance with the intent of avoiding the enemys ~trength.:~ Tanks should use secondary roads for routes of advance over prlmary roads because secondary roads are: -less apt to be thoroughly defended. -less apt to have demolltlons on t h e m i s n The main concern for tanks fightlng in open desert is to brlng the enemy under effectlve flre and start hitting hlm before he 1s In a position to hlt back.:s* The tank plays a declslve part In desert warfare because the desert contains no natural obstacles for It and no limitations on Its Tanks can move with perfect impunity under time fire provided by either 10-
normal time fire to cover tank attacks.: Terraln selection is essential for success. Terrraln can make the mass employment of tanks Impossible. Mountains, forest, waterways. and jungles can cause tanks to operate In dribs and
drabs.:-=
47
When radio comunications break down. the comnander w l l l lose the abllity to control his unlts.'Aa Leaders should comaand and control fran a forward postlon
In
order to:
-Improve troop morale. -take advantage of mmentary tactlcal advantages. -speed declslons.Ld4 Tanks need external phones to ccamuunlcate wlth ground
soI dl ers.
L3
Tanks should f Ire at terraln whlch probably conceals anti-tank weapons. It Is better for a tank to waste amunition than rlsk Its d e s t r u ~ t l o n . ~ * ~ The rule for when to code or use clear concerning radlo aessages
IS:. if.
48
tactlcs have the capablllty to 'hand dellver' munltlons that can destroy tanks.'&*
More German tanks were disabled by wear and tear from long dlstance travel, lmproper dust fllters. and lmerslon in mud than by enemy Fleld repalr and overhaul has to be set up near the front to prevent the loss of tanks for extended per10ds.~~' Units in wartime wlll expend a slx month peacetime supply of repalr parts In a matter of a few days.'" The supply of replacement tanks has to be considered as lmportant as aimnunltion To flght contlnuously tanks must be employed in relays due
to crew fatigue and maintenance. requirements.*74
The average man could tolerate two to three tank burn outs. Few men withstood slx t o eight burn outs without mentally breaking down,
7s
49
The US deslgn attitude should change. The Uss zeal for a rellable machlne caused It to neglect the deslgn of the flghtlng system. The US was more concerned wlth transmlsslons. suspenslons. and chasls than wlth the deslgn of armor protectlon and armament
74
Tank versus tank superlorlty depends on: -maln gun accuracy. -rate of fire. -speed and maneuverablllty.
-leadershlp/tralnIng/morale.
-radlo ~0ntact.l~ Tanks havlng superlor armament and protectlon can offset slgnlflcant quantltatlve superlority. On average I t cost flve
The more tanks rely on infantry, artillery. and a i r to support their maneuvers, the more vulnerable tanks became to Infantry, artlllery, and alr weapons. The more tanks have to rely
on ftrepower f r m air. Infantry, and artlllery. the less effecrlve they beccrme.
no
The whole alm of the modern technique of war Is to get men and weapons to effectlve polnts behlnd the enemy's maln posltlons. Effect polnts are fuel trucks, anmunltlon, supplies. mechanics and staff that are behlnd or followlng the enemy's vehlcl es. Tanks need to 'eat the cake of heavy protection and have moblllty too.'ie2 Heavy tanks, llke the 56-ton German Tlger. are not needed. What tanks lack In weIght/protectIon Is more than offset by Improved moblllty. History I s full of examples of a small, agile flghtlng
army defeatlng a larger, less moblle one.1ga Tanks are often required to carry lnfantry on the Inslde/outslde of the vehlcle. Tanks should be able to carry emergency supplles.s04
In desert
main gun are more important than the quantity of tanks.ins Tanks have llmlted capabllltles and thelr role Is severely restrlcted by; -mechanical unre1iabIlity. -unfavorable terraln. -Improved AT weapons.1o1 Tanks need to be able to swlng around on their own axis.Ie7
51
The Brltlsh conflrmed the need for two types of tanks. One ,Isneeded whlch emphasizes speed/range/moblllty to perform cavalry type missions and one Is needed whlch emphaslzes firepower and protectlon to perform hard flghtlng.sOO
A unlversal tank Is needed to fill both Infantry and
cavalry roles.1s0 The Ideal tank would be well protected, aglle. powerful. and well armed.aPo Speclal tanks are needed to overccme physical obstacles llke concrete walls, plllars. plllboxes, and other fortlflcatlons. The other types of speclal tanks needed are; -amphI blous -mlne clearing -ditch fllllng -ground f lrmlng -br 1dgl ng
- f 1amet hrow I ng
-mlssi.le. launching
-search1 Ightlng19a Flamethrowlng tanks are very useful for attacks on houses, bulldlngs, and concrete emplacements. The morale effect Is tremendous.s92
Amphibious
52
the OVERLORD beach landlngs. The duplex drive tanks performed herolcally on the OVERLORD beaches and estlmates have them savlng the llves of more than 10,000 Allied soldiers. General Elsenhower
reported that wlthout amphlblous tanks, it would have been doubtful that the assualt forces could have f i r m l y establlshed the~elves.'~"
In
than heavy tanks because light tank wlll facllltate air delivery and require less fuel .19*
The.we1ght of armor cannot make up for lack of maln gun power. Weight can only limit maneuverabillty and speed.*95 Tanks welghlng more than 40 tons wlll face conslderable difflcultles when belng transported or crosslng brldges. over 40 tons should be amphlblous.lPd
Any tank
Tanks equlpped wlth aircooled. dlesel englnes proved very satlsfactory. Dlesel englnes are better than gas englnes because
53
-better fuel econauy. -Increased range. -better rellablllty and less malntenance. -reduced potentlal for fire.'-'
Large numbers of rellable tanks can achleve superlority over fewer but more sophlcated tanks.sPg The Inherent defects of machlnes severely llmlted tank performance. Tanks were not sturdy enough f o r war. Trackplns and other parts broke at alarmlng rates. Tanks In ccmbat expended a
SIX month peacetlme supply of repair parts In a matter of a few
used. 3oo
54
PART I 1 1
- THE ARAB-ISRAELI
The Arab-Israeli Wars of 1967 and 1973 can be characterized as short, rapid confllcts domlnated by maneuver and flrepower. The weapons of declslon inltlally were tanks and hlgh performance alrcraft. but the lntroductlon of the mlsslle (In air defense
( S M S ) and anti-tank
ended the ablllty of the tank and the aircraft to dominate alone. In both confllcts, battles were fought over various terraln ranglng from deserts to mountains, farmlands, and urban areas. The weather condltlons under whlch both conflicts were fought varled. wlth temperatures ranglng from 130 degrees Inside tanks flghtlng in the Slnal to below freezing temperature readlngs
55
Antl-tank
The future belongs to the faster tank. Tanks should rely on speed rather than on armor for
Wheeled tank transportatlon should be used to move track vehlcles long dlstances.lO*
Tanks should be able to advance up to 60 mlles a day In war condltlons.zOs They should be able to cover 500 mlles In the
course of a campaIgn.aod
56
Tank maln guns are 10 tlmes as lethal as thelr World War I 1 counterparts. World War I1 maln guns could hlt only one out of 20 targets at 1,500 meters. Current maln guns can hlt between 10-15
out of 20 targets a t 1,500 meters.2a7 The tank ccnmander's machlne gun needs to be able to effectlvely flght close-In Infantry. The tank ccmander's machlne
gun needs to have a large amunition storage capaclty and be easy
to load.20n Both the -50 callber and 7.6machine guns are effectlve
agalnst hlgh performance alrcraft. Approximately 36 out of 100 ground kllls were credlted to machine gun
Armor plerclng rounds are not effectlve agalns Infantry.
exceedlng 4000 meters.2sr There are not enough machlne guns on tanks to suppress
ATGMS . I S
2
57
The tank that has a longer maln gun range has an advantage. The Israell' maln gun outranged the Arabs' maln guns by 400 meters.
This enabled Israeli tanks to stand off and reglster hlts
The tank that has better maln gun accuracy wl11 decide
battles.sa4 Tanks equlpped wlth sophlstlcated slghtlng and
58
very hlgh.2'P
October War. the Arabs lost more than 2000 tanks and 500 artillery pieces in less than three weeks of flghtlng.2'9 more than 800 tanks durlng the same period.==O
A tank can increase its chances of survival through Its
moblllty. Quite slmply, a moving tank 1 s harder to hlt than a stationary o n e . ' " '
in very large
the October War were caused by ATGMs.""= can blunt armor attacks.2sr
ATGHs are more effective than tank main guns as the range
to the target
Tanks are more effective than ATGHs
at ranges less than 1000 meters because: -the tanks' main guns more accurate. -tanks can fire faster.a29 When fightlng ATGHs at extended ranges (greater than 1000 meters), chances of survival are better If the tank uses the cover and concealment provided by terrain rather than trylng to move. Movement by tanks at extended ranges i s relatively unimportant In affectlng the hittlng ability of ATGM
59
AT mlsslles or rounds.2a1 Close air support (CAS) Is effectlve against tanks. The
maverick mlsslle recorded 42 dlrect hlts out of 50 tries. 'Smart barbs' hlt 25 out of 32 targets.="' Tanks should use passlve measures agalnst enemy alr attack. Armored forces should use small and dlspersed trains. bunkers, and tank positions. Crews and tanks should be camouflaged. Tanks should use the terraln for concealment from alr observatlon.aaa
Protect I p [ ~
Unprotected fuel and 011 containers are a flre hazard.2a* Storlng maln gun amrmnltlon above the turret rlng can result In secondary explosions and catastrophic kills of both tank and crew I f turret I s penetrated. Store all amrmntlon below the turret
r Ing.
A tank crew needs special flre reslstant unlforms to
prevent burns.
NOMEX unlforms are effectlve In reducing burns.
60
-need NOMEX gloves. The combat vehlcle crewman (CVC) helmet Is effective protectlon If properly fltted. The padded lnterlor of the CVC helmet needs to be
fireproofed.*"*
Hydraullc fluld must be flame reslstant or It wlll cause the tank to catch flre when the turret Is ~enetrated.~"'
Uslng infantry and artlllery to suppress ATGMs can greatly reduce A T G M effectlveness.Z*O
61
Wlthout suppression of the enemys air defense systems, close air support for tank maneuvers is Ground
forces must break up the enemys SAM umbrella to use a l r wlth tanks.a4a
tactics.=*-
tank even I f the tank Is supported by artlllery and Tanks that move In open terraln may expose themselves to highly lethal long range ATGM and cannon flre. Movement must be covered or concealed or done when enemy AT weapons are being surpressed.240
62
- The statlc defense Is no longer viable. - Tanks need the ability to suppress enemy
firepower
to allow movement.
team to successfully suppcess.2-p Tanks need to shoot and move to confuse the enemy's lndlrect flres.2sn Tanks should work In groups of elght to twelve vehlcles. Flrst, tanks should occupy hull down positions and observe, acqulre the enemy, and destroy the acqulred enemy. Then tanks should move and occupy different hull down positions and agaln observe, acqulre. destroy, and move. Tanks should repeat the occupying, acquiring, destroying. and moving sequence at least three times from three dlfferent locations. This procedure will confuse the enemy's lndlrect and direct flres.2s'
detonatlng fuses bury Into the sana and lose some of their
63
The slde that has the superior numbers of tanks on the battlefleld has the advantage.zsa The employment of captured tanks will be llmlted by lack of repalr parts and arrmunltlon.234 Tanks must be used In mass to be The best defense Is a good offense.23C
Control. and Close alr support Is not effectlve when the ground cclrmander and the alr cannander can not c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n l c CAS a tI e s. ~ ~ ~ posslble only after effectlve alr/ground coordlnatlon.zaO Tank forces will need tralned observers to effectlvely control alr/artlllery fires. Ineffectlve.aso The 'people factor' can wln over equlpment superiority. Tank forces need skllled crews, good leadership. and good c m a n d and control procedures to The tralnlng level of lndlvlduals and crews can determlne the dlfference between success or fallure on the battlefleld.zdl Leaders can Increase crew proflclency by:
64
Untrained observers v l l l be
-1ncreaslng stablllty of assignments. -emphasizing realistic llve flre tralnlng.2c2 Tactical success depends on resourcefulness. Innovation. and flexlbillty.2*a Leaders and soldlers must be tralned to
exploit success regardless of whether It was planned for in the operations plan o r not. It i s not enough Just to be able to execute a rlgld plan.2c4 The best tank i s the one wlth the best crew.2L3 To succeed against quantltatlvely superlor forces, one needs a superior operatlve/skiIIed force.2cc Leaders need to be far forward and emphaslze mission The cannander's order should be 'follow me.'2ce
Tank forces need an emergency vehicle ldentlficatlon radio frequency on the mobile battelfield to ald In preventlng frlendly forces from firlng on other friendly forces.zL' Tanks and alrcraft need a rapld and posltlve method for identlfylng both friendly air and tank elements to aid in preventlng friendly forces from flring on each other.27o When tanks are defendlng, they should use wire to conanunicate. When tanks are attacking, they shouid use FM radio to ~ommunlcate.~~'
65
The use of fixed call slgns by tank forces makes I t easler for the enemy to plnpolnt the ccamand functlon at each conrnand level. Vulnerablllty of radlo ccmmunlcations can be a slgnlflcant factor In the loss of battlefleld carmander~.~~ Tanks need to be able to operate In an lntense electronlc warfare envlrcment. offset jammlng.z7a Wlthout good morale, there can be no success In war.=;* Pre-arranged procedures wlll be needed to
f l a t with
open to overcome vlslblllty and target acqulsltlon During iarge nighc.sart1es.. the illumination createa
3y
66
The key to a successful rnalntenance effort Is the foward use of area contact teams. Teams need to be tallored to meet the speclflc needs of the supported ~ n l t s . ~ ~ ~ Baslng class IX repair parts stockage on peacetime maneuvers w l l l result In wartlme shortages.a7D Extenslve
cannlballzation will be needed to sustaln operatlons.200 Recovery vehlcles need c r o s country capablllty.asl Water and Its protectlon are essentlal In the desert. Protect water by storlng It Inside the turret.ao2
The tank 1 s the slngle most Important weapon on the mechanized battlefield. It must be deslgned to break through enemy defenses, get to hls rear, destroy hls cmrmunlcatlons. reserves, artillery. malntenance, and
67
The future belongs to the faster, lighter tank armed with an ATGn of lmnense penetrating power. Tanks should rely on speed rather than armor for protectlon.s04
A tank that has a larger main gun baslc load capaclty has
an advantage. Israeli tanks could carry between 63-70 rounds.
Arab tanks could carry between 42-46 Large tanks are better than small tanks because; -they can store more ammunition. -they can contain better flre control systems. -they are less tlring on crews.zos Small tanks are better than large tanks because of thelr lower A low tank sllhouette Is desirable because
lower tank sllhouettes are smaller targets and are easler to cover and conceal and harder to acquire and hit.z9o The tank conmander's cupola Is not satlsfactory because I t ;
-Increases the tank's sllhouette. -Interferes wlth machlne gun operatlon. -restricts ~ I s l o n . ~ ~ '
68
-partially closed. but leaving a 3-5 Inch space between the tank and the hatch to permlt 360- degree observation. -fully Tank ammunition needs to prolong, not degrade, main gun tube Ilfe. Adding lubricant to the anmunltion powder charge can
extend tube Ilfe four to five tlme~.'~~ Tanks should have no external hardware such as
searchlights, water cans, oil cans that are vulnerable to overhead
artlllery fires or small arms flre that will prevent the tank commander fran brlnglng supporting air burst artillery onto hls tank to suppress enemy infantry.a94 Tanks need to be designed to mlnimize catastrophlc loss. The battle damaged tank repalr rates f o r the October War was: Britlsh Centurions 60% returned to action Soviet T54155
US 14WM60
69
Tanks have the a b l ity to detect and avold long range slar
moving ATGMS.~
A tanks mobility, armor, and firepover afford It both
protection and the abllity to move quickly fran sltuatlons of dlspersion to those of concentration -and vlce versa.a0o
70
Llghter weight means less track wear.and better sand crosslng capabllltles. Llghter welght can Improve maneuverablllty.aOa
power. ?!ant
A tank's
artlllery fragnents and small arms flre. Penetrations w l l l allow sand and dirt to enter alr Intakes and cause englne fallure.30'
71
Tank amnunltlon needs quality control checks. Durlng the October War. more than 15.000 US sabot rounds were found to be unserviceable because of tumbllng or skewlng of the round.aos The more canpllcated the tank or system design, the harder
The list of lessons learned In this chapter is not all-lncluslve. Further research may reveal other lessons that can be added. The lessons listed in thls chapter will form the basis for the analysls and comparison In chapter 4 and the determlnatlon
72
ENDNGTES
1.
p.11.
Rlchard M. Ogorklewlcz. W u r o d Forces (New York: Arco, 1970), (London: Faber and Faber.
2,
3.
Brmv
Hugh Elles, 'Some Notes on Tank Development during the War', Quarterle, Aprll 1921. p.268.
T k
4 . Robert 3, Icks and others, F l ~ Slnce s 1916 (Washington D . C . : Natlonal Services, 1933). p.197.
5. Ian V. Hogs, Bmpur In W f l l c t : The Deslan and Tactlcs pf m u r e d Fiuhtina V e h i u (London; Janes. 1980), p.31.
6 .
Icks and others, p.198. Elles. p.270. Hogg. p.31. Icks and others, p.198.
7.
8. 9.
11.
1 2 .
14.
15. Icks and others, p.186. 16. Icks and others. p.187. 17. Icks and others, p.191. 18. Icks and others, p.197. 19. Martel. ,73 p.38.
2 0 :
23. Kenneth 3. Macksey. W: A Hlstorv of the BrmPuted Fiahtlns Vehicle (New York: Ballantine. 1971), p.45. 24.
31. Elles. p.270. 32. Icks and others, p.193. 33. Icks and others, p.193. 34. Icks and others, p.194. 35. Hogg. p.29. 36. Icks and others, p.201.
37;
Hogg;
p.29.
38. Icks and others, p.193. 39. Elles. p.279. 40. Ogorklewicz, p.15.
41. Samuel Rockenback. 'Tanks and Their Cooperatlon with Other Arms," lnfaatrv J m , January 1920, p.543.
Icks. p.80.
46. Elles, p. 271. 47. Macksey. p.33. 48. Elles. p.286. 49. Macksey. p . 3 3 . 50. Rockenback. p. 543. 51. Macksey. p. 33. 52. Rockenback. p.543.
53.
54. Ernest D. Swlnton, Llmlted. 1932). p.30. 55. Elles, p. 64. 56.
57. Rockenback, p .540. 58. Elles, p.270. 59. Chynovlth. p. 507. 60. Martel, W
61.. Icks and.others. p.311. 62. Icks and others, p.203. 63. Icks. p. 80. 64. Icks and others, p.203. 65. Icks and others, p.203. 66. Hogg. p.29. 67. Icksand others, p.191. 68. Rockenback, p.450. 75
69. Icks and others, p.193. 70. Rockenback. p. 542. 71. Icks. p.80. 72. Peter Chamberlaln and Chrls Ellls. and London: Hamlyn. 1974), p.2. 73. Icks and others, p.312. 74.
(New York
Icks. p.80.
75. Rockenback. p.450. 76. Icks and others, p.183. 77. Icks and others, p.202. 78.
79. Martel, W A r m o u r e d
Farces. P.4.
July 1972,
; 9.39.
87. Icks and others, p.311. 88. Icks and others, p.194. 89. Icks and others, p.185. 90. Icks and others, p.194. 91. Hogg. p.25. 92. Icks and others, p.194.
76
93. Icks and others, p.202. 94. Icks and others, p312.
95. Rockenback, p.540.
96. Icks and others, p.183. 97. How. p.29. 98. Icks and others, p.195.
99. Icks and others, p.201.
100. Elles. p.269. 101. Icks and others, p.311. 102. Chynovith. p.507. 103. Martel. !&-&mured
m. p.220.
104. Tm Wlntrlngham. The Stow of WeaDons and Tactlcg (Freeport: Books for Librarles Press. 1943). p 277. 105. Icks. p.279.
106. George S. Patton Jr., Kar as I Knew I t (Boston: Houghton Mifflln, 1947). p.43.
of the d i l l , p.125.
..
111. E l l l s . p.126.
112. Ellls, p.127. 113. Hoffman Nickerson. Sons. 1945), p.264. 114. Martel. -Armouted 115. Wintringham. p.208. 116. Hoggs, 11.103. 77
Pol icy (New York: G. P. Putmans and
Forces, p.159.
117. Mlldred H . Glllle, Epralna the Thunderbol.t. (Harrlsburg: Mllltary Servlce, 1947). p.209. 118. Peter Chamherlaln and Chris Ellis. 1969) p.8. 119. Martel.
.-
p.156. p.156.
122. James Loop and Steven Zaloga. and Amour Press. 1983). p . 8 . 123. Nlckerson. p.250. 124. H o w . p.84. 125, Janusz Piekalklewlcz. 1986). p. 247. 126. E l l l s . p.125. 127. Plekalkiewlcz , p .298. 128. Plekalklewlcz. p.298. 129. Piekalklewicz. p.247.
130. Icks, p.341.
134. Martel', O u r ~ r m o u r e d , p.147. 135. Hoggs. p.84. 136. Glllie. p.268. 137. Icks. p.341. 138. Wlntrlngham. p.205. 139. Ellls. p.137.
78
140. Glllle. p.256. 141, Plekalklewlcz. p.75. 142. Glllle. p.215. 143. Martel, O u r w e d Forces. p.148. 144. Glllle. p.279. 145, Patton. p.413. 146. Wlntrlngham. p.209.
p.216.
Patton. 0.348.
159. Hart, p.186. 160. Hart, p.185. 161. Patton. p.348. 162. Ellls. 13.134. 163. Plekalkiewicz, p.75. 164. Plekalkiewicz. p.77. 165. Gillie. p.279. 79
166. Icks. p.341. 167. Patton. p.345. 168. Patton. p.348. 169. Wlntringham. p.222. 170. Plekalkiewicz. p.134. 171. Plekalklewlcz. p.135. 172. Ellls. p.126. 173. Martel. , 174. Nlckerson. p.264. 175. Icks. p.341. 176. Martel. m
d , p.155.
p.148.
177. Plekalklewlcz, p.77. 178. Plekalklewlcz. p.254. 179. Plekalklewlcz, p .297. 180. Chamberlaln and Ellls. p.36. 181. Wlntrlngham, p.227. 182. Glllle. p.217. 183. GIIlle. p.262. 184. Gillle. p.279. 185. Hart, p.185. 186. Ellis, p.125. 187. Hartel,, r e d 188. Martel. -
p.157.
Forces. p.147.
p.248.
192. Martel, -ed 193. Glllle. p.279. 194. Wlntrlngham. p.211. 195. Hart, p.185.
Forces, p.306.
p.158. 196. Martel, Our.ArmouredForees. 197. Martel, e d 198. John Sanders, p.5.
199.
Forces. p.157.
Ellis, p.126.
200. Ellls. p.126. 201. Avlgdor Kahalaml. 'Defense of the Golan.' Mllltarv, October 1979, p . 4 .
202. 'The 1973 Mlddle East War; An Engtneer's View," November/December 1979, p.395. 203. Avaham Adan, Qn the W p.469. s of the
l h eMllltu
War to War: The e l l 204. Nadav Sofran. 1948 1961 (New York: Pegasus. 1969). 13.353.
Coofrontatlon
205. Sofran. p.353. 207. Wllllam Depuy, 'Impllcatlons of the Mlddle East War on US h n Y Tactlcs, Doctrine and Systems., US Amy Tralnlng and Doctrlne Camand, March 1975, p.10.
208; Waiter J. Henderson, .'Analysisof :he Lessons Learnea in the
October 1973 Arab-Israeli War,' Marine Corps Development Education C m a n d . May 1977. p.C-324.
209. Memorandum. 'The Lessons Learned frcm the Mlddle East Crlsls." Department of the Army, Offlce of the Asslstant Chief of Staff for Force Development, January 18, 1974. p.27. 210. Jac Weller, "Tanks In the Mlddle East", LlUJtarv Rev&, 1976, p.18. a s t . ' p.21. 211. Weller, ' Tanks in the Mlddle E
May
81
n e t .
Sep/Oct 1974,
213. C. N. Barclay, 'Lessons from the October War'. P.28. 214. Weller, 'Tanks in the Middle East,' p.22. 215. Barkley. p.28. 216. Memorandum. p.6. a s t . ' p.22. 217. Weller, 'Tanks in the Mlddle E 218. Depuy, p.16. . 6 . 219. Depuy. p 220. Henderson, p.A-1-3. 221. Depuy. p.14. 222. Adan. p.469. 223. Depuy. p.4. 224. Depuy. p.2. 225. Henderson, p.C-3-24.
m, Mar
1974,
226. Cham Herzog, ^Arab-Israeli Wars- (New York: Vintage, 1984). p.190.
227. Weller, " T a n k s
228. Depuy, p.12. 229. Depuy, p.13; 230. Depuy, p.16. 231. Memorandum, p . 3 . 232. Depuy. p.28. 233. Henderson, p.E-2-6.
234. Henderson, p.A-1-3
82
239. Charles Wakebridge. 'Tank Myth or a Mlssile Mlrage,' &lU&xy August 1976, p.10.
240. Memorandum. p.1. 241. Depuy. p.28. 242. Henderson, p.E-1-7. 243. Memorandum, p.24. 244. Wakebrldge, p.10. 245. Herzoz. p.26. 246. Depuy, p.13. 247. Wakebrldge. p.10. 248. Henderson, p.C-3-27. 249. Depuy, p.4. 250. Weller. T h e Flght at Suez,' p.133. 251. Weller, T h e Flght at Suez," p.133. 252. Memorandum, p.16. 253. Depuy, p.12.
254. Yenaerson. ?.i-i-8.
255. Wakebrldge. p.10. 256. Henderson, p.A-1-3. 257. Henderson, p.F-10. 258. Memorandum, p.24. 259. Memorandum, p.23. 260. Henderson, p.A-1-3.
83
261. Depuy. p.2. 262. Memorandum. p.4. 263. Henderson, p F-54. 264. Barclay. p.28. 265. Weller. 'Tanks In the Mlddle East.' p.17.
266. David Elagar, 2 (Tel Avlv: Unfverslty Pub1 Ishlng. 1975), p.247. 267. Henderson, p.A-1-3. 268. Sofran. p.350. 269. Henderson, p.F-10. 270. Henderson, p.F-10. 271. Henderson, p;F-10. 272. Henderson, p.F-54. 273. Henderson, p.F-54. 274. Barclay. p.26. 275. Sofran, p.350. 276. Memorandum. p . 4 . 277. Memorandum. p.18. 278. Henderson, p.1-1-6. 279. ilenderson. p.i.-l-7: 280. Henderson, p.1-1-8. 281. Henderson, p.1-1-8. 282. Memorandum. p.35. 283. Depuy. p.18. 284. Henderson. p.A-1-3 285. Wakebrldge, p.11
84
286. Depuy, p.33. 287. Henderson, p.A-1-3. 288. Wakebridge. p.11. 289. Wakebrldge. ~1.11. 290. Henderson, p.A-1-3. 291. Henderson, p.C-3-24. 292. Henderson, p.C-3-24. 293. Henderson, p.C-3-24. . 2 . 294. Memorandum. p 295. Memorandum, p.8. 296. Elagar. p.272. 297. WeIler. 'The Fight at Suez', 298. Adan. p.268.
p.133.
85
CHAPTER
This chapter provides the reader an analysis of the lessons learned from World War I, World War 11. and the Arab-Israel1 1967 and 1973 Wars concernlng tank and small tank unit mobility, flrepower, protection. c a m a n d and control. and overall design.
'
86
MOBILITY
t w a s the lowland
could severely
that tanks should rely on speed rather than thlck armor for battlefield survival. Another c m o n lesson was that tanks need an alternate method of movlng long dlstances over roadways. Inltlally. a
dual-capable tank was ought, one that could travel long distances uslng Its wheel capabl Ity and, as I t neared the battlefield. could stop and put on
ts tracks and flght the battle uslng Its
87
track capability.
wheeled tank transporter was deslgned. Wheeled o r rall tank transportation was used extenslvely in both World War I 1 and the Arab-Israeli Conflicts to move tanks long distances o r from one front o r theater to another front o r theater. The last c a m o n mobillty lesson was that a tanks range, or need to refuel, serves as a llmiting factor.
In maneuver warfare
the need to refuel tanks can have a slgniflcant effect on the campaign plan.
moblllty Include dltches, mineflelds. barbed wire, urban areas, and natural features such as rivers, canals, and mountains.
2)
tank speed of its opponents and fast enough to degrade the a b i l i t y of enemy AT gunners to hit the tank. Speed should be used to provide protection.
4)
FIREPOWER
An examlnatlon of the lessons learned concernlng tank firepower established the folloulng c m o n ground.
A tanks maln gun or anti-tank cannon needs to be able to
penetrate o r bust through the armor of Its opponent. The requirement for accuracy at extended ranges, while not documented in the World War I lessons. was quite evident from the lessons learned durlng World War I1 and the Arab-Israel1 confllcts.
Thls
need for accuracy at extended ranges was derived from the Improved AT capabllitles of the defender durlng World War I 1 and the Arab-Israel1 confllcts. Improved AT weapons took away the tanks
bunkers, and Infantrymen as tanks dld routinely durlns World War I engagements. The lesson that a tanks maln gun needs to have an anti-personnel capabillty serves as another common thread concerning main gun CapdDllitleS. The anti-personnel requiremenr grew in Importance as the range of the enemys AT weapons Increased to outslde the tanks machine gun ranges. The need for multlple machlne guns proved to be another c m o n lesson. Machine guns are needed to destroy o r suppress
enemy Infantrymen. antl-tank posltlong. combat support and service support personnel and equlpment. and to defend agalnst hostile
89
alrcraft. The exact number of machlne guns needed was not ldentlfled as a result of thls research, but the rule 'the more the better" appears applicable. Another c m o n lesson Is that tanks need to have a 360degree fire capability. Whlle this lesson was not specifically documented In the Arab-Israel1 confllcts, the fact that all tanks Involved In the S I X Day War and the October War had a 360- degree flre capablllty serves to relnforce the documented World War I and World War I 1 lessons on the need for that capablllty and on the need for a turret to provide It.
.
One lesson that dld not appear In World War I. but should
be consldered cannon. was that technologlcal advancements Concerning the tank's flre control system, such as a rangefinder
or stablllzatlon. can provlde a marked advantage by providing
technology by ltself Is not enough to gain the advantage. I t is equally Important to develop and use exploltatlve tactical methods
90
the development and use of exploltatlve tactlcal methods, superlor technology wlll lose much of
Its potential value.
In swnmary, the c a m o n thread of the lessons learned concernlng flrepaver was as follows:
1)
antl-personnel capablllty.
3)
PROTECTION
An examlnatlon of lessons learned concerning tank protectlon established the followlng c m o n ground.
91
The key to battlefield survival for tanks Is based on thelr proper employment. Tanks must be allowed to fight in a manner that maximlzes thelr abllltles and takes advantage of the enemys weaknesses. They must be allowed to maneuver using the cover and concealment provlded by the terraln whlle supported by the flrepover of other tanks or by other means (Infantry. artillery.
or alr). Tanks
dependent on the terraln and the enemy sltuatlon, wlth the aim of maxlmlzlng their speed, protectlon, extended maln gun range, and rapid flre capabl1Itles.
a slngle soldler. The lesson that tanks saved thousands of soldlers llves
provlde agalnst lndlrect and machlne gun fires and the tanks abllltles to destroy machine guns and quickly decide battles repeatedly caused tanks to be credited wlth saving thousands of
1 ives.
92
The destructlon and death caused by fire serves as another c m o n thread lesson. Whether It was fuel flres In World War I. amunition fires in World War 11. or the combination of fuel, ammrnitlon and hydraullc fluld flres In the Arab-Israel1 confllcts. flre was the greatest destroyer of the tank and the greatest fear of Its crewmen. Every aspect of tank deslgn and
capabllitles should be examined wlth the alm of reducing the posslbllltles of flre. The last c o m o n thread was that tank crewmen need speclal unlforms to provlde protection agalnst flre and other hazards
emp 1 oyment
.
2)
A tank cannot be protected from all hostlle
Ire. but as a mlnlmum. It should be protected wlth the alm of defeatins all AT weapons that a sinsle soldier. can carry.
3)
93
flght as part of a ccmblned arms team conslstlng of Infantry. artillery, air defense assets, air, and other cclnbat support and servlce support elements. Infantry wlll be needed to klll o r
Suppress enemy AT posltlons, clear urban and forested areas, and hold captured ground. Artlllery wlll be needed to suppress enemy
needed to protect tank maneuvers frctn attacks by enemy air. Friendly air will be needed to gather information and augoent artlllery flres. Combat servlce support elements wlll be needed
a forces.structure a t - its. iowest ievei. The. lnaiviauai t a w or tank sectlon. the individual infantryman o r flre team, and the crew, section, and team leaders from the other combat support and servlce support elements must know how to fight or support based on the teams col lectlve strengths and weaknesses. Addltionally.
94
When tanks are employed as part of a comblned arms team. their success depends on several factors: -tanks must be used in mass. -tanks must be concentrated In narrow sectors or polnts of enemy weakness. -the selection of terrain must permit mobility and
mass employment.
-the terrain must provlde cover and concealment or other means must be employed. such as smoke/fire to suppress o r blind possible and known enemy AT positions.. -tanks must be able to ccamunlcate wlth each other, other ground forces, and the alr. Another canmon lesson I s that tanks are offensive weapons that should be used to destroy or counter strong defenses. Whlle thls purpose i s ccamon. the method of how tanks overcame strong defenses changed. During World War I. tanks could conduct frontal
assaults and use their mobility, firepower and protectlon to close wi.th and destroy Infantrymen. machine gun posltlons. and artlllery. thus destroying the defense.
During the later stages
Poor tank vlslblllty serves as another c a m o n thread. Wlth hatches open tank vlslblllty Is Ilmlted, and when buttoned-up vlslbllity Is severely restricted. Llmlted vlslbility i s the maln reason why tanks, wlthout the support of Infantry forces, are not capable of holdlng ground. Due to llmlted vlslblllty. enemy
Infantry can Ilterally hand-dellver deadly munltlons to tanks not flghtlng as part of a ccmblned arms team.
A cannon lesson concernlng tank movement I s that tanks
movlng In open terraln and wlthln range of enemy
AT posltlons must
elther employ smoke to conceal themselves o r effectlvely suppress enemy AT positions. Fallure to do either wlll most likely result
located mechanlcs. tanks will not be mechanically able to fight. Fuel and amunition must be provlded on a contlnuous basls.
96
1)
team. The comblned arms team must be Integrated and tralned down
-concentration
control maneuvers..
8)
97
OVERALL DESIGN
or purpose for tanks i s twofold; to asslst the Infantry by provldlng a protected fire platform that could destroy or counter the enemy's strong defenses, and to provlde the capabillty to concentrate qulckly at a polnt of enemy weakness, penetrate his defenses and strlke deep Into the rear of his positions. These two purposes were constant throughout the study and they significantly contrlbute to the moblllty versus protectlon aspect of design. The need for special tanks also serves as cOmnon ground. Speclal tanks, such as mine rolllng, brldglng. and amphibious tanks, were successfully employed and made significant contributions on the battlefield.. The need for a fast, light. less sophisticated tank over a slower, heavy, more sophlstlcated tank serves as another c m o n lesson. The essence of this c m o n thought was on designing a tank that was fast enough and small enough that the enemy's anti-tank gunners or weapons probabllity of hit would be severely degraded,
light enough to cross all types of soil conslstency and cut down
on wear and tear, and wlth a minimum of production time and cost.
98
Several factors concerning a tank's design and production were c m o n to all of the studied conflicts.
(1)
throughout the conflicts and supported the concept of a smaller, lighter, less sophisticated, and cheaper tank over the larger, heavier, more sophisticated, and more expensive tank.
(2)
and the need for thousands of tanks was c m o n to all three conflicts. This inability and need supports the smaller. lighter,
having many tanks that are light and less sophisticated over the concept of having fewer tanks that are heavier and more sophisticated because lighter tanks have less wear and tear and less sophisticated tank are easier to field fix or repair. In summary. the c m o n threzd of lessons learned concerning overall design was as follows:
1)
b tank's
purposes.
2)
At a minimum,
99
severely degrade enemy AT gunners' and weapons' probabillty of hlt). less sophlstfcated (to speed productfon time and ease In fleld flxlng and repair). and cheaper (to allow great numbers in peacetlme).
CHAPTER SUMMARY
100
The purpose of this chapter Is threefold: to answer the research questlons. to ccament on the slgnlflcance and contributions of the thesls and to make reccomendatlons f o r future research.
tank warflghtlng concernlng Indlvldual tank and small tank unlt moblllty, flrepower. protectlon. c m a n d and control, and overall
design?
In the multl-page llsts of lessons learned In chapter 3 of this thesis. These llsts of lessons-learned are not all-lncluslve. and the exlstence of addttional lessons Is hlghly probable. These
gIeaned from varlous sources Includlng books, perlodlcals and US government documents. The authors of the sources were elther
actual partlclpants In the tank warflghtlng experiences, professlonal hlstorlans o r recognized subject matter experts concernlng tank warflghtlng. The majorlty of the lessons learned
were contalned In more than one rellable source, few were controversial, and all lessons could be dlrectly related to actual battles or combat experlence. The significance of this study I s threefold: this research provldes a basls of lessons learned that can be Incorporated into the future organlzatlon, deslgn and doctrine of US tank forces. Thls research should help prevent US tank forces frm relearning costly past lessons on future battlefields. Flnally. this
research should serve as a foundatlon for additlonal research concerning tank warfi.&t.ing lessons learned.
102
The contrlbutlons of thls research to the source of knowledge concernlng 20th century tank warfare are twofold. Flrst, It ccanpares and ties together what soldiers. engineers and hlstorlcal researchers have learned and documented about 20th century tank warflghtlng. Second, I t establlshes a comnon thread
whether current US tank design and capabllltles Incorporate the c m o n thread of lessons learned.
(3) Research should be conducted to determlne
whether current US tank force organlzatlon and doctrine reflect or incorporate the c m o n thread of lessons learned.
(4)
whether the c m o n thread of lessons learned has relevance In the warfighting experlences of the 20th century that Involves smaller-scale tank warflghtlng.
103
CHAPTER SUMMARY
104
3IBLIOGRAPHY BOOKS Adan. Avraham. Qn the W Press, 1980. Asher, Jerry. Cawany. 1987.
s of the
& & L
- 1940,
Boston: Houshton
Chamberlaln. Peter and Ellis. Chrls. plahtlna VehIcleq. New York and London: Hamlyn. 1974.
1969.
Depuy. Trevor N. &e Evolutlon of WeaDons and Warfare. Indlanapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrlll Company, 1980. Elagar, David. billtarv A m e c t s of the Arab Israeli CQnflictg, Tel Aviv: Unlversity Publishing. 1975.
Ellls. John.
Glllle, Mlldred H. Foraina the Mllitary Services, 1947. Hart, Liddel. e l Cawany. 1953. Hart. Llddel. T~.L@Js Herzog, Cham.. Hogg, Ian V .
Thunderbalt.
Harrisburg:
P a D e m New York: Harcourt. Brace and Slde of the Hlil, London Cassell. 1973.
-Ts)-.aei i Wars,
m u r in CQntlicts: The Deslan and Tactics of London: Janes Pub1 ishing. 1980. Battles, Gordon Clty: Doubleday,
19 1 L
Icks. Robert J.
1972.
Icks. Robert 3. and others. Fiahtina c e Washlngton D.C.: National Servlces, 1933. Martel. Glfford.
Faber.1954.
London:
Faber and
105
Loop. iames and Zaloga.. Steven. i c a n Arms and Armour Press, 1983.
Lonaon :
Macksey. Kenneth J. Tank: A HLstorv of the A c m s w e d F l a b U n q Vehicles . New York: Ballantine. 1971. Nickerson. Hoffman. and Sons, 1945. Ogorklewlcz. Rlchard M. York: and Policv, A m o w e d For-
&c as I
Boston: Houghton
Plekalkiewlcz, Janusz. Poole-Dorset: Blandford Press, 1986. of Tanks 1933 to 1945, Elms Ross. Macleod G. Court: Stockwell Llmlted. 1976. Sanders. john. Sofran. Nadav.
& Q D I
Stout, Wesley Wlnans. Tanks are Mlahtv h r y s l er Corporation, 1946. Limited. 1932. Winetrlngham. Tom. Storv of weaoons U c t i c s , York: Books for Libianes Press, 1943.
GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS Depuy. Willlam. 'Implicatlons of the Middle East War on US Army Tactics, Doctrine, and Systems,' US Army Training and Doctrine C m a n d , March 1975. Henderson, Walter J. "Analysls of the Lessons Learned In the October 1973 Arab-Israeli War.' Marine Corps Development Education Command, May 1977.
106
Memoranaum. "The Lessons Learnea from the Wladle East Crisis," Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Chlef of Staff for Force Development, January 18, 1974.
PERIODICALS Barclay. C.N. Chynowlth. B.C. #Lessons from the October War.'
&my.
March 1974.
Ellis. Hugh. "Some Notes on Tank Development During the War.' ,April 1921.
Kahalaml, Avlgdor. "Defense of the Go1an.O Hllltarv Revley, October, 1979. Martel, Gifford. July. 1927.
U t r v JourL
Rockenback. Samuel. 'Tanks and Thier Cooperation wlth Other Arms: m t r v Journa, January 1920. OThe 1973 Middle East War:
Engineer,
An Engineer's V1ew.O
T& M l l l t u
Wakebrldge, Charles. 'Tank Myth o r a Missle Mirage.n Wlltarx Review. August 1976. Weller, Jac.
1976.
"Tanks In the Middle East," W1 itarv Rev iw,May 'The r'lgnt at Suez,"
I -
1974.
..., 3er-
, Sep/Occ
107
Combined Arms Research Llbrary U.S. Army C m a n d and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth. Kansas 66027
Colonel Don Martin. Jr. 1688 S. Garland Court Lakewood. Colorado 80226
108