Divide and Conquer

Gary Hunt
August 16, 2009

In War -- in battlefield combat, one of the most important strategies, especially if the enemy has
superior numbers, is 'divide and conquer'. Very briefly, it can be explained that if you have a
force of 3,000 and the enemy has a force of 4,000, you will probably be defeated in combat.
However, if you can cause him to divide his forces into 2 groups, each having about 2,000 men,
is beneficial. You have gone from 25% less men, against his entire force, to a 50% advantage
over one of the split units. Once the first unit is defeated, the second unit can be attacked, with
much better odds than if an attack was made on the entire force, at the onset.

The same is true of the psychological warfare America is embroiled in, today, and the political
warfare that has begun to divide the country.

Each unit that advocates an idea, solution, or objective is limited to the number of people in that
unit against the joined forces of the Congress; the Executive administration; and, the multitude of
Administrative Agencies. The effectiveness of our side is usually diminished further by forces in
different states not coordinating their effort; units with the same objective or goal, not working in
unison; and, variations of methods of achieving the objective sought.

I have compiled a list of singular objectives that are commonly pursued, today. Bear with me as
we look at these issues, and discuss what they will achieve, in the end, if the groups are
successful in their pursuit. The items presented are in no logical order, but the primary issues, I
hope, are all included.

911 Truth Seekers - the truth seekers - The goal here is to prove that the government was
involved in the planning and execution of the events, which destroyed the World Trade
Center, and resulted in our involvement in war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Though the issues
brought up by the group are ambiguous rather than tangible, let us suppose that they convince
the majority of the people in this country that the government was involved. What happens
then? Will it end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Or, have they established a totally
separate identity from the World Trade Center? If the government does acknowledge
culpability, they will throw out a few dogs to be devoured by the press and public, and go on
with their evil ways -- planning better, in the future.
Problem: Administrative Agencies have too much authority, often independent of the
legislative and executive branches of government.

Birth Certificate pursuers - Suppose irrefutable proof of the bastard president's birth
elsewhere (disqualifying him from office) is brought forward. What will Congress and the
Courts do? They have a dilemma. Every enactment or document signed by the President
becomes void, nunc pro tunc (from the beginning), or, since the task of, say, recovery of the
stimulus money approaches impossible, and the undoing of the troop allocations to
Afghanistan cannot be undone, what is Congress to do. Nothing --is what they can do. It may
cost the President his job. He may be charged with high crimes, and convicted and
imprisoned. Who will take his place? The successor would be Joe Biden, as Vice-President,
or, John McCain, as runner up in the election. So, you, at best, get a Republican President.
Was Bush that much better than the bastard president? Or, are both parties in bed to bring this
country to its knees. Remember, the first stimulus package was under Bush
Problem: The Congress has not ventured into qualifying Presidential aspirants, and the Court
refuses to look at the matter. There is a qualification in the Constitution, but no direction as to
who is to act as the qualifier. Congress has not, as was intended by the Founding Fathers,
sought to fill the gap of omission in the Constitution. Congress has let us down.

Audit the Federal Reserve - Suppose there is an audit of the Federal Reserve. What audit
standard would apply to an entity as unique as the Federal Reserve? So, first, a standard
would have to be developed to assure that the audit provided the desired results. I would
suggest that this would first be given to the Treasury Department to propose the standard. I
can see Treasury taking a year or two to develop their proposal for a standard. Then, it would
go to the Congress who would assign it to committee, and it would be in Congressional
committees for at least two years. Once the standard was determined, the audit would be
conducted. Most assuredly, at least some of the auditors would be people well versed in the
practices and procedures of the Federal Reserve (inside men). Even if the audit, when (if
ever) completed showed massive fraud, the result would be to enact laws to prohibit that sort
of fraud in the future, and, at best, begin the process of looking for an alternative to the
Federal Reserve Act.
Problem: Congress was outside of its authority when it enacted the Federal Reserve Act in
1913. The effect of the subsequent years of entrenchment; loss of GOLD and silver as a
means of paying debt; and, the enormous debt that has been created and mostly owed to the
Federal Reserve makes a solution under the present system almost impossible. The Congress
failed to adhere to the Constitution.

End the Federal Reserve - Even if ended abruptly, the effect on the economy, especially
with regard to the National debt, would be devastating. What alternative to both dealing with
circulating currency and payment of debt would be implemented to avoid such disaster?
Problem: The Congress abrogated their responsibility under the Constitution and allowed an
Administrative Agency (Treasury Department) and a private (foreign) group of investors to
control our economy.

Healthcare - Objections to national health care are late, and will do nothing to reduce costs.
As has resulted from mandatory (in some cases) healthcare insurance, the costs have
escalated because the marketplace was undermined. Once the captive audience (mandatory
insurance) was implemented, costs could only go up. If healthcare were left in the free
market, there would still be hospitals, doctors, and producers of prescription drugs. They
would, however, have to provide their services at prices that were reasonable and
manageable. Otherwise, they would have no customers. Absent customers, they would lower
their prices, or look for new work. Supply and Demand is the best manager of costs. Supply
and Demand allows us, the ''consumers”, to determine what appropriate and acceptable costs
are. Once removed from our hands, the value of the service was also removed.
Problem: Congress usurped authority that was not granted by the Constitution, by adopting
socialism as a means of buying votes. There is no Constitutional authority to require
businesses to provide mandatory health insurance, not is there authority, now, to implement
national healthcare.

Continental Congress - The First Continental Congress was called for by the New York
Committees of Safety. The other colonies responded, in kind, by agreeing to the Congress.
The primary result was the "Non-importation Agreement", as well as some petitions, and,
most importantly, they understanding that the colonies could work together for a common
goal. The delegates were either existing members of the respective legislatures who were
NOT on the side of the Royal Government, or delegates selected by the various Committees.
This was true of the subsequent Continental Congresses. The Congresses were called for by
the delegates, not the delegates being called for by the Congress. The current call for a
Continental Congress is a small group (though, admittedly, growing) of people who have
called for delegates to their Congress. This could never be construed to be an emulation of
those first Congresses. Since their line of representation is downward and selective, anything
that they do or ask for is nothing more than any other group could do or ask for. It bears no
weight, and is not representative of the people or a constituency.
Problem: We have been denied Redress of Grievances, as guaranteed by the Constitution. In
desperation, we are seeking ways to regain that right, but it will only come when the Rebel
US government returns to its willingness to heed the will of the people.

Ron Paul - Ron Paul has come along and captured the hearts of many of those who believe
that the Rebel US government has gone astray. He is right in much of what he says, and those
who have adhered themselves to him, are also right in doing so. However, we must think,
also, of what effect it would have if Ron Paul were elected President. What would change?
The President cannot act without the consent of the Congress. If he does, he places himself in
a position to be censured or overruled by the Congress. He has a multitude of administrative
agencies to deal with (Over 1000), and most of them have already developed a mind of their
own. Alone, or even with as many as one hundred members of Congress on his side, the
changes on the nature of government, and the power of the political elite is such that there
would be no substantial change in the operation of the government.
Problem: The nature of government has changed to the point that return to the confines of
the limitations imposed by the Constitution is nearly impossible. Separation of powers has
become ineffective because of the power of the political parties and the political elite.

FEMA Camps - Back in the nineties, a list of alleged FEMA prison camps surfaced and
circulated via fax network and other methods that were common. That same list has
resurfaced and circulated on the Internet. The list, at least part of it, was bogus. I personally
investigated four of the sites and they were not what they were alleged to be. More recently,
another list has begun to circulate. It is completely different, though it does mention locations
near some of the older lists’ locations. This list may have more truth to it than the previous
list. It appears that either bids have been taken, or even contracts let for restoration and/or
construction on a number of World War II camps or internment centers. So, what if they are
building these camps? What will we do about it? Can they be stopped? Yes, if the new
construction is destroyed, but that will simply delay things. Will exposure to the public of the
camps service any purpose? Yes, and NO People will be aware of them and maybe resentful
that they are being built, but the government will, most assuredly, come up with a plausible
explanation that will satisfy at least some, and nothing will be done to change the
continuation of what they have already begun.
Problem: An Administrative Agency (FEMA) has been granted extraordinary power,
authority and budget funds to 'prepare for an emergency, whether man-made or natural'.

Codex Alimentarius & Genetically Modified Products (GMP) - The Food and Drug
Administration has determined, without anymore than administrative consent from Congress,
what is good, and what is bad in our food supply. Once those few people make the decision,
regardless of the source or influence behind the idea, it becomes law -- and, we have to eat it
-- unless we grow our own food. Some suggest that we will not be allowed to grow our own
food, but that aside, we have lost quality food from retail sources (unless small and local)
and, in most cases, cannot even find out, without extensive research, what they have been
doing to that food supply. If we get rid of the agency, we still have thousands of food
production companies that have implemented the programs, and will be reluctant to withdraw
from what they have gotten used to.
Problem: An Administrative Agency (FDA) has been granted extraordinary power, authority
and budget funds to decide what we eat, regardless of who benefits and who suffers because
of their decisions.

Child Protective (sic) Services - Every state has, under suggestion or pressure from the
Rebel US government, established a Child Protective Service, or equivalent. Though the
name sounds good, in fact, the agency (with federal funding) has the right to determine
whether you are a fit parent, or not. "Spare the Rod and Spoil the Child" has become
criminal, when applied to disciplining your child. CPS can seize your children without due
process of law, and then place them where they see fit. It is likely that some of these agencies
have even found that putting children out for adoption can be profitable - beyond the already
lucrative government funding. Were we to simply get rid of the agencies (an awesome task,
in itself), that will not undo the damage, not the condition, of decades of these agencies
affect.
Problem: The government, Congress and administrative agencies in Washington, D.C., have
funded and encouraged the establishment of agencies within the states who are 'legally'
qualified to determine if you are fit parent, or not. This has been destructive of traditional
family values upheld in this country for centuries, and has put the state as parent, under color
of law, of all children.

Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) - The Uniform Commercial Code was adopted by
nearly every state, back in the fifties or sixties. Its purpose who to have a set of rules, easily
understood and established, with the purpose that consumers would be able to understand
their relationship to merchants, lenders, etc., and know where they stood and what their rights
were in transactions. It was implemented by being enacted, in near pure form into the statutes
of the respective states. There were a number of provisions that, definitely, benefitted the
consumer. One was that when you made a payment, the postmark date of that payment had to
be accepted as the date of payment by the lender. This has been overridden by the legislatures
and now the lender can even hold your payment for a few days before recording it, which
often throws the borrower into an overdue status and attaches the penalties that apply to
overdue payments. Though beneficial, when implemented, it has become more of a tool for
the commercial interests and means by which they can screw us out of penalties, add charges
on top of charges, and, generally run the show. This, like CPS, is administered by the states.
Congress tends to support the changes to credit cards, with a total disregard for the consumer.
Problem: The Congress had, at first, encouraged enactment and acceptance of the UCC.
Then, they turned their backs on the intended purpose and allowed lobbyists to encourage
changes that took away the protections and passed laws contrary to the UCC.

Stop the New World Order - This is an admirable goal. However, the question is whether it
is achievable? And, if it were achievable, how would we achieve it? There is no doubt that
certain identifiable organizations are major players in the effort to create a New World Order.
I believe that some organizations, though often included, are not, at least in rank and file
memberships, supporters of the effort. Once identified and exposed, do you think anything
will change? They sit in their positions of power and influence (backed by their wealth) and
dictate what they perceive as the solution to all of man's problems on earth. We can touch,
feel, taste and see the accomplishments that they are making, every day of our lives. The only
conceivable way of stopping this effort is to dispose of those who are participants. Let them
know that their lives have as little value, or less, than the lives that are lost, every day,
because of their programs
Problem: Congress, the Executive, the Courts and all of the principle Ministers of
administrative agencies are pawns in the game of world domination. This extends, largely,
into the state and local governments. Where that influence is not direct, it is, at least, indirect.
So long as there is no accountability for public officials, officers and agents, there is no
solution.

Kick Them All Out - So, who will fill their vacancy? Another programmed member of their
political party, or the programmed member of the other political party. In the event that you
do manage to get a third party candidate in office, it will, more likely, be a lowly office that
offers no threat to the establishment power scheme. Further, if against all odds, your third
party candidate ascends to a higher and more influential position, you can rest assured that he
will either succumb to "the way that it's done" by trading votes to get some of his items
passed, or, being but one or two who vote against bad legislation because they believe it to be
bad (Note: many votes are cast against certain programs which already have assured votes for
passage, for the sake of impressing their constitutions that they are "not party men").
Problem: The legislative system in this country, at federal, state, county, and city levels has,
with few exceptions, become corrupted and the office is sought for personal gain and
influence.

Drug Wars; Medical Marijuana - Drug wars are nothing more than an attention getter and
a tool used to demonstrate to the naive portions of the public that government is doing all that
it can to get rid of 'crime'. Of course, there is no victim to the crime, except the person who
spends thousands for their lawyers, thousand more in fines, and, perhaps a few years of his
life in prison.
Problem: Administrative Agencies have been granted, by the Congress, the authority to
enact policies that, a Constitutional Amendment could, only impose less than a century ago.
They have also ignored the guarantee of Republican Form of Government [Art IV, Sec 4,
Constitution] in the states by allowing their policy to override state enactments and initiatives
that have removed penalties for certain drugs and persecuting those who they have managed
to license, by removing licenses of those who violate their administrative policies.

Confederate States of America - This group of sincere patriots have endeavored to arise
from the past. They have taken the mantle of those who, many years ago, tried to stop them,
then beginning to grow, element of Congressional and Presidential tyranny. Though secession
was not considered unconstitutional when the New England States met in Hartford,
Connecticut, in 1814-1815, to, among other things, discuss secession, it was those same
states that supported Lincoln in his claim that secession was unconstitutional. Therefore, the
most damaging war in our history was conducted to 'prove' that secession was
unconstitutional. The precedence having been established, just how far do you think that you
will get with the current effort?
Problem: Congress and the Executive have, in effect, revised the Constitution effectively
outlawing any attempt to remove oneself from the compact. Once in, you are stuck. There is
no way out of the corrupted influence of government by secession.

American Party; Constitutional Party; Libertarian Party; Christian Conservatives - In

terms of any of these entities achieving any successful political advancement, they are little
more than any social organization. Though it may feel good to be among people who think
like you, the ability to effect any change within the current political structure with a new
party is non-existent.
Problem: The Congress has managed to manipulate the electoral and election processes to
remove, or reduce to insignificant, the possibility of a challenging third party to achieve even
a modicum of success.

Show me the Law (IRS - income tax) - Though there are a number of reasons why the
Income Tax, as applied, is illegal or unconstitutional, there are many who have ended up in
prison, or dead, in their efforts to avoid this unlawful imposition on our lives. To their credit,
probably millions do not pay Income Taxes. Will this change anything other than how much
of what one earns they are allowed to retain? It absolutely will not. With all of those who
have moved out of the system, there has still been no substantial change to the nature of
imposition and collection of this tax. The government needs the tax, the benefits, and
deductions so that they can 'social engineer' the society. It has nothing to do with the
government's need for the money, and everything to do with 'teaching us that they control our
very lives'.
Problem: Congress has given an Administrative Agency (IRS) power over our lives, without
regard to the Constitutional restrictions on taxation.

Freedom Communities - Wonderful ideas, in concept. Live amongst those with like minds.
They will only serve as indefensible enclaves, if the government ever chooses to crack down
and arrest resistors. They are quite capable of becoming their own prisons.
Problem: Congress has extended its authority beyond the scope allowed by the Constitution,
and encroached upon the domains that were preserved to the States.

State Sovereignty - In the nineties, 17 states adopted sovereignty resolutions. To my

knowledge, they were never rescinded. Today, states, once again, are adopting sovereignty
resolutions. Most of them were the same states that did so, back in the nineties. Though nice
proclamations, they end up having no merit. Whether they were passed out of sincerity, or to
'convince' the citizens of the respective states that they would not succumb to federal
pressure, they failed then, and they will, most likely, fail now. States have relinquished their
authority, under the Constitution, for contributions of money from the federal agencies. They
have sold us down the drain. When we object, they pass resolutions as pacification, but will
still continue to take the greenmail that is offered by the Rebel US government. If these
resolutions passed, and then are forgotten we cannot expect the states to be a viable part of
our efforts to restore the government to its proper role.
Problem: The federal government usurped constitution powers to control the states, and
then bought the states into submission.

State Citizen (National) - A valid exercise that, when completed, frees you from US
citizenship. Once freed, however, you have to be vigilant and careful. A misstep may land
you in jail, or worse. If you manage to establish your credential in your home community,
you will have to repeat the education of law enforcement and judicial officers, when you
leave you local area. This will be a perpetual battle for Rights retained by the Ninth and
Tenth Amendments. If millions were to adopt this status, what would change regarding the
other evils of government?
Problem: The unconstitutional Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, allowed by the
Congress, the Executive, and the Courts, created a fictional relationship between our public
servants and ourselves. The effect was to make them master and us the servant.

North American Union - If we do not stop the North American Union, we will be like the
European Union and we will have foreign trucks and drivers driving through our country.
Yep! Even if you do manage to stop it, how long do you think it will be until the steam goes
out and it gets started, again?
Problem: Congress has, many times before, relinquished or sovereignty in favor of foreign
alliances that do not come under the heading of "Treaty', as the Founding Fathers perceived
it. NATO, SEATO, United National, NAU, all of them are just cars on a train toward one
world government.

H1N1 vaccine - This subject has generated a disproportionate amount of debate. The facts
appear to suggest that the 'outbreak' and the 'death rate' are substantially lower than many
other sources of disease/death. This brings in to question (suspicion) the insistence of a
vaccine. Quite simply, take the vaccine, or don't take the vaccine.
Problem: The Administrative Agencies, in conjunction with United Nations agencies have
determined a course of action to be implemented (forced) upon the American people. This
application seems to be inconsistent with the facts, but there is no recourse (Redress of
Grievances), as provided for by the Constitution).

Illegal immigration/aliens; Border protection - Our borders, especially the southern

border, have become sieves which allow illegal entry (invasion) into the United States
sovereign lands. This breech of responsibility by the federal Administrative Agencies
required by law to enforce immigration laws has allowed access, without the security that is
required even for legal entry, to our country by workers, drug dealers, criminal elements, and
very probably terrorists. In the meantime, for the first time in our history, American citizens
are required to have a passport and go through extensive security to return to their own
country, from visits to Mexico and Canada.
Problem: Administrative Agencies, by the policy and failure to enforce existing law, provide
a fertile ground of activity that is in conflict with our professed Foreign Policy. Since both
foreign policy and execution of the laws of the land fall in the Executive Branch of
government, there is an apparent conflict within that branch which can be demonstrative of
nothing less than contempt for the laws of the land.

Education - Public Education has its foundation in this country prior to the Revolution. It
has been held that an educated citizenry would be watchful of abuses by government. The
concept, as implemented and conducted for over a century was that local school boards:
raised revenue through ad valorem taxes; determined curriculum based upon the needs of the
community; provided facilities for the purpose of education; received all of Section 16 in the
Western lands (the only participation by the federal government); and, hired instructors to
provide the education to the students. As time went on, the federal government created a new
cabinet position (Administrative Agency) for Health Education and Welfare. Over e few
decades, nearly all of the authority for the above listed responsibilities evolved to absolute
control by the federal government.
Problem: An Administrative Agency has displaced community, county, state, and family
from the determination of what their children will be taught. They have controlled who may
teach; what material can be used to teach; and extended their control to matters outside of the
realm of education.

Homeschooling - Public education was, historically, '\"made available". This left the parents
of children to decide whether they want to allow their children to attend public school,; be
taught at home (homeschooling); or, receive no formal education, at all. The state stepped in,
first, to make education mandatory (truant officers). Now, many states have imposed their
guidelines on what qualifications, what material and what guidelines parents must adhere to,
if they choose to educate their own children.
Problem: State and federal Administrative Agencies have remove much of the responsibility
that God gave to the parents, with regard to the rearing of their children, so that they can be
indoctrinated in the ways of the government's choosing.

Abortion - Abortion is a moral issue. It is not a federal matter, but is, or was, in the purview
of state and/or local government. That is the nature of the Constitution, as understood by the
Founding Fathers. Federal crimes were limited to those enumerated in the Constitution, and,
those that were passed in accordance with Article I, Section 8, clause 17, of the Constitution.
In Roe v. Wade [410 U.S. 113]. Justice Rehnquist, dissenting, said, " the Court necessarily
has had to find within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently
completely unknown to the drafters of the Amendment... in 1868, there were at least 36 laws
enacted by state or territorial legislatures limiting abortion... The only conclusion possible
from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment
withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter."
Problem: The Supreme Court has become a legislative authority in their country. It has used
its position of power to aid in the usurpation of both state and individual rights, reverting the
people to the roll of subjects, as they were under British rule.

Eminent Domain - Eminent Domain has a long history in our English heritage. Eminent
Domain was the means by which the entire community could be served with roads, canals,
and other necessities for common use. It has been used for private gain, aided and abetted by
city and county governments, since at least the 1960s. Its original intent is a benefit to the
community, though the many of current applications are motivated by greed.
Problem: The courts, from local to supreme, have ignored the history and intent of the law
by allowing 'reinterpretations' of previous cases (stare decisis). If the courts are allowed to
change the meaning of a word or phrase top obtain their desired conclusion in a case, the
will, by such action, remove Justice entirely from the courtroom.

Congress not reading the bills that the vote for - It has always astounded me the Congress
seems to find more new need for legislation, every year. Over 3,000 pieces of legislation are
enacted, every year. One would think that, if what Congress did to solve problems worked,
there would be less need for new laws rather than more. Perhaps understanding, as they have
recently admitted, that they do not read the laws that the pass, we can understand why things
are getting worse rather than better.
Problem: Congress, whether a Senator or a Representative, is elected and paid to do a job for
his constituency. That job is to represent our interests. Regardless of recent flagrant disregard
with respect to spending, answering questions about why they support something, and, there
general unwillingness to accept any responsibility for their action, it would seem that
enacting laws because someone told them that they were good law (and, we don't have any
idea who told them), is as far away from "representation" as one could possibly imagine.

Balance the Budget - There has been for years an effort to force the federal government to
'balance the budget'. Let's just suppose that they did. The budget would of necessity, include
debt service (payments on interest, and, hopefully, substantial amounts to reduce principal),
along with the necessary expenses to conduct the business of government. Even if the
operating expenses of the government were reduced to minimal, when added to the debt
service, the amount required to continue the conducting of government would be well beyond
the means of the current sources of revenue. This would require imposing a tax that would be
unbelievable, and totally unacceptable to most Americans.
Problem: The debt is increasing at an alarming rate because Congress and the Executive
have determined that if they want it, they will buy it. Consider that the debt, right now, is in
excess of $38,000 for every man, woman and child in this country. Congress and the
Executive have dug a hole so immense that it is nearly impossible to get out of it.

Militia (Civilian Defense) - Militia have been actively forming and then disbanding for the
past 15 years. They generally participate in some combat training, establish a chain of
command, and then get bored with their actions. There are some, however, who have retained
their character. They, the ones that have stood the test of time, have also acknowledged that
the Militia is subordinate to the civil authority. At this point in our history, that civil authority
is the governor of the state in which the militia is formed. Similarly, the colonial militia were
 subordinate to the Royal Governor and to their local Committee of Safety, if they had one.
The necessity was different, then. Indians were a major concern. The Committees would also
establish night watchmen if the community might be subject to Indian attacks. Much of the
activity of the militia was totally without knowledge of the Governor, and the right to bear
arms, though unwritten, was without question.
Problem: The Rebel US government has done everything that they could to delegitimize the
militia. Most states have followed suit, even to the point of trying to redefine militia as the
National Guard. Most states, however, retain laws which make all able-bodied males between
the ages of 15 and 45 (may vary from state to state) members of the militia, and require no
registration.

Committee of Safety - There is an effort afoot that is attempting to build Committees of

Safety from the top down, much like the Continental Congress (above). They claim that all of
the Committees were composed of existing legislators. They have, however, put the cart
before the horse. Their page refers to a book by Agnes Hunt about the Provincial Committees
of Safety. These colony level Committees came long after the original Committees had called
for and conducted the Continental Congresses. The Provincial Committees of Safety, for the
most part, came after the Declaration of Independence. The foundation for organization,
leadership, and, equipping of the militia came first from the local Committees of Safety.
Relief for the people in Boston, during the embargo, was provided by the local Committees
of Safety. They were, without a doubt, the foundation of the American Revolution. They were
not supporters of candidates, nor did they support issues. They were a single focus group that
was intent on providing guidance to the community for its own defense and well-being.
Problem: Through the educational process and the qualifying of text books, the Department
of Health, Education and Welfare has managed to relegate, nearly to oblivion, the role played
by the Committees of Safety. They have attempted to destroy any understand of true Grass
Roots Activism, by so doing. The problem is -- we do not have any Committees of Safety
upon which we can depend for lawful guidance of our activities, should the need arise.

In reviewing the above issues, and realizing what the outcome of each will provide as a result,
we can see that we are facing myriad task, none, or few of which will result in more than a very
singular accomplishment -- which might easily lead us down another path to pursue.

If the particular objective is reached and the results are adequate, this leaves us only to join
another battle.

If, after years of effort, a battle, which has been waged, is won, leaving no residual to encumber
us into a continuation of that battle, we can choose another battle to pursue.

However, who is to believe that if a battle is won, finally and decidedly, that another objective
will not appear to take its place.
If a New World Order, dominated by a few, against the many, is truly being waged, the tactic of
'divide and conquer' will surely be continued. It will drain our resources from now to eternity, if
we choose to pursue our goal, one issue at a time.
The division of our forces is inherent in the struggle that we are pursuing. Each, due to his
personal ideology, has chosen one, or another, of the objectives, and is willing to give 100%, not
realizing the futility of success, once the battle is completed.

If our forces are so divided as to assure the success of the New World Order, we are only passing
time until, battle completed, or not, we realize that failure is the only course that we have
pursued.

Is there an alternative course that can achieve all of the objectives?

If we were in a battlefield where an effort was made to divide the forces, giving advantage to the
enemy, we would, if our objective was to win and we had superior forces, refuse to divide our
force. The enemy would have anticipated being successful in creating the division (as they most
certainly believe to be the case), and would not anticipate an all out attack on their main base,
leaving them divided simply by believing that we were divided.

In this psychological, or, political war that we are engaged in, what strategy would overcome the
division that has given such an advantage to the enemy? Could it be to concentrate our forces in
a single issue (of those above mentioned)? Most assuredly, it would be unsuccessful, since even
though that battle may be won, it would only lead us to the next battle. Each battle fatiguing us
even more, as we trudge through dozens of issues, and leaving the door open for the creation of
even more issues to string along our forces until exhaustion and frustration finally lead us to
accept defeat.

Where could we concentrate our efforts to expect that we could 'attack their headquarters' and
achieve success on all fronts?

Unfortunately, in this world of rapid and advanced communication, their headquarters are spread
all over the world. There are, however, many identifiable 'sub-headquarters' where their leaders
work, meet, relax, or live.

If we were to begin an effort to attack them on terms that were advantageous to us, rather than
them, we would begin by going to these locations and finding the culprits. We would tar and
feather them, and we would destroy the buildings that they used to enjoy that which they have
reaped from our toil.

Yes, they will arrest us for doing such things. They have established a support base (police,
courts, etc.) to protect them, since they realize that the Founding Fathers did not face such
protection for the taxmen and politicians of the day. However, arrest is a small price to pay for
the goal that we seek. And, if the juries are fully informed, there will be no convictions.
Create such discomfort and generate fear in their hearts, and, perhaps, they will find another
country to plunder. It is for us to take back our country, and, in so doing, all of the problems
enumerated above, along with the dozens unmentioned, will be capable of solution by We the
People.
If we take to heart the last two mentioned items (Committees of Safety and Militia), we can
begin forming a substitute government (as did the Founding Fathers), which, once installed as
the true Government of the United States, we can dispense with the problems, one after another.

Would we rather pay lip service to George Washington? Or, would we rather do that which is
necessary to achieve the removal of a despotic government? He was willing to do what was
necessary to expel those who resisted allowing freedom and liberty to prevail in the land. He
supported those peaceful efforts, when there was hope for them to succeed. When peaceful
methods had convinced the Founding Fathers that they would be of no avail, the efforts were
stepped up, as necessary, to force the hand of the despotic government. Retreat was not in the
dictionary. How extensive an effort would be required was unknown, and every effort was made
to escalate only to the extent necessary. The desire of the despots to retain control was the force
that was needed to compel the colonists to risk all, when all else had failed.

We have tried petitions. We have tried demonstration. We have been ignored by those in power
for every effort we have exerted. Perhaps, now is the time to extend our efforts into a minimal
physical effort. Create displeasure and discomfort of those in power, and those who support
them. In addition, we must be sincere and thorough, for if we fail in this effort, there remain but
two choices - Victory by force of arms, or, defeat by failure to be willing to commit to the cause.