PURPOSE (Objectives):
Students in 8th grade science will:
1. Be able to follow a procedure.
2. Be able to collect and record raw data with precise measurement.
3. Be able to use Microsoft Excel to input data, convert units from English (inches) to Metric
(cm) and calculate averages and uncertainty (error).
4. Be able to use Microsoft Excel to create a bar and line graph.
DESCRIPTION:
This learning activity will take 4-5 50-minute class periods in the science classroom and computer lab.
Students will be paired with a partner. Each student will need a computer. One will be used to view a
Power Point titled “Creating a Spreadsheet” and the other will be used to complete the spreadsheet on
Microsoft Excel. (If fewer computers are available, then students will do both activities on one computer.)
Students need access to Microsoft Excel and Power Point.
TYPE YOUR NAME HERE Standing jump before and after exercise
Reg Jump (in.) Reg Jump (cm.) Post-run Jump (in.) Post-run Jump (cm.)
trial 1
trial 2
trial 3
trial 4
trial 5
trial 6
trial 7
trial 8
trial 9
trial 10
average
highest
lowest
H-L
uncertainty
TYPE YOUR NAME HERE Standing jump before and after exercise.
Reg Jump (in.) Reg Jump (cm.) Post-run Jump (in.) Post-run Jump (cm.)
trial 1 48.00 120.00 50.00 125.00
trial 2 48.50 121.25 50.50 126.25
trial 3 49.00 122.50 49.00 122.50
trial 4 48.00 120.00 50.00 125.00
trial 5 49.50 123.75 49.50 123.75
trial 6 48.50 121.25 51.00 127.50
trial 7 48.00 120.00 51.25 128.13
trial 8 49.50 123.75 51.00 127.50
trial 9 49.50 123.75 50.50 126.25
trial 10 49.00 122.50 50.00 125.00
Will a human’s ability to jump from a standing position be improved by exercising beforehand?
This question has been analyzed, researched, and tested in a controlled experiment. Data shows that the
average jump with no exercise beforehand averages 40.3 centimeters. With an uncertainty of 0.7 the best
value range, or range of the average including error, is 39.6-41 centimeters. Ten trials were conducted in
a precise manner and error was minimized throughout each trial by starting at the exact same location for
the jump each time. Next, a different subject spent two minutes exercising by running in place. Then,
when the muscles were warmed, that subject performed the same jump procedure as the subject with no
exercise. The average for the ten trials of this procedure was 41.5 centimeters. There was an uncertainty
of 1.2, so the best value range was from 40.3 to 42.7 centimeters. It is interesting to note that the
uncertainty was 0.5 centimeters greater for the jump with exercise. Perhaps the subject was more tired
towards the end of the trials and had difficulty jumping as far in a consistent way. When the two data
ranges are analyzed, there is an overlap in the average ranges. The average ranges overlap from 40.3-41
centimeters. That means that there is an amount of 0.8 centimeters where the data could fall for both
testing groups. Due to the overlap in averages with the error factored in, we cannot draw a clear
conclusion about the data. Despite taking caution to conduct a controlled experiment, the data is not
significant.
NETS
ACTIVITIES CURRICULUM PERFORMANC
STANDARDS E INDICATORS
(Science
HCPSS and
MD VSC)
Students collect data by completing a standing jump lab. Goal 15g, 16a,
17a.
Students follow a Power Point presentation to record and analyze Goal 17a, 15g
data. 1 ,2
Students complete standard set up of an Excel document including Goal 17a
opening, saving as .xls file, titling, renaming, titling columns, re-
adjusting column widths, and formatting cells to 2 decimal points. 1, 2, 3
Students will enter data into a spreadsheet. Goal 17a 1, 2, 3
Students will use formulas to convert data from English to metric Goal 15g 1, 2, 3
units.
Students will use formulas to calculate averages and uncertainties. Goal 17d 1, 2, 3
Students will create line and bar graphs for all trials. Goal 17a 1, 2, 3
Students will summarize in writing the data collected in an Goal 16d
experiment.
Students will determine the sources of error that limit the accuracy Goal 17d
of an experiment.
Software:
Access to Microsoft Excel
Access to Microsoft PowerPoint presentation with directions for the lesson.
Access to Microsoft Excel template if modification is being made for students.
Other Materials:
One yardstick per pair of students
Two small pieces of masking tape per pair
One stopwatch per pair
Pencil and data table to record data per pair
ASESSMENT:
Data Analysis Rubric
1. Choosing a topic.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~macinnis@ozemail.com.au/scifun/projects.htm#N42
This website was created by Peter Macinnis and copyrighted in 2001. This page is part of the GEM, the
Gateway to Educational Materials, which is sponsored by the US Department of Education. Click on “topic
ideas for projects” and scroll down through the list. Choosing a topic is the most challenging part of
science research! This list will help you to find a topic you are interested in and that has a real-life
connection.
8. Ask an expert.
http://www.k12science.org/askanexpert.html
This site is run by the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education. It is affiliated with the
Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering. You can click on any of the links to take you to a variety of
subjects, from space science to oceanography. This is a good resource to find background information
and more facts to support your conclusion. I like the section on pests- you can ask the Orkin man!
9. eNature
http://enature.com/home/
This is a great site if you are doing a biology project. It has field guides, local nature resources, plant
information, expert information, and some fun things like puzzles and screensavers. There is a
searchable database of articles on nature topics that could be used in background research or in your
conclusion. I especially like the picture database called “Not sure what you just saw?” It is an interactive
field guide that helps you identify things based on pictures.
COMMENTS:
Megan originally taught this activity without the PowerPoint. The students used Excel to enter their
individual data, and students learned how to enter data, create formulas, and make graphs by following
oral directions. The assessment rubric was used in the original lesson. We created this learning activity in
response to the frustration she experienced during that lesson. This particular lesson has not been tried in
this final form but knowing the areas of difficulty that needed to be addressed. We feel that this lesson
should be successful for the students and the teachers.
REFERENCES:
The items in this learning activity came from teacher prior knowledge.
Used with permission of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) National Educational
Technology Standards (NETS) Project (http://www.iste.org or http://cnets.iste.org) Contact: Lajeane
Thomas, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3161, Ruston, LA 71272; Voice: 318 257-3923 Email:
lthomas@latech.edu