Issn 0012-9976
Ever since the rst issue in 1966, EPW has been Indias premier journal for comment on current affairs and research in the social sciences. It succeeded Economic Weekly (1949-1965), which was launched and shepherded by Sachin Chaudhuri, who was also the founder-editor of EPW. As editor for thirty-ve years (1969-2004) K rishna R aj gave EPW the reputation it now enjoys.
editor
C Rammanohar Reddy
EXECUTIVE Editor
aniket Alam
Deputy Editor
Bernard DMello
Senior Assistant Editors
P S Leela
Assistant editor (web)
Anurag Mazumdar
editorial Assistants
Kamal G Fanibanda
General Manager & Publisher
K Vijayakumar
editorial
edit@epw.in
Circulation
circulation@epw.in
Advertising
advertisement@epw.in
Director
k kanagasabapathy
C 212, Akurli Industrial Estate Kandivali (East), Mumbai 400 101 Phones: (022) 2887 3038/41 Fax: (022) 2887 3038 epwrf@vsnl.com
Printed by K Vijayakumar at Modern Arts and Industries, 151, A-Z Industrial Estate, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 and published by him on behalf of Sameeksha Trust from 320-321, A-Z Industrial Estate, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013. Editor: C Rammanohar Reddy.
a difcult task, but the movement against corruption achieved this. Although, it is a fact that caste has not been that prominent in the electoral politics of the capital, yet the complete absence of the caste factor in the distribution of tickets and also in the voting behaviour are remarkable facts as far as the AAP is concerned. The set of outputs also includes two dimensions the pre-election response from the political parties and the postelection feedback by the same. In the pre-election phase, the government and political parties responded to this demand of a corruption-free India in a very arrogant manner. The government and the ruling parties focused on the argument you are also corrupt instead of proving that we are not corrupt. But people ultimately choose the policy of we are with the ones who are against corruption. The post-election feedback is again very non-traditional. The leaders of national parties are repeatedly saying that we need to learn from AAP. Generally, the political parties promise to learn from their own failures, not from the success of others. Moreover, theoretically AAP is supposed to be in the learning phase, but it has got so much to teach the senior players of the game. For instance, as regards low-budget campaigns, vote without note, and of course, the rejection of identity politics. Another shift in the political culture of India is the meaning and interpretation of democracy. India follows the parliamentary model of democracy which has two aspects representation and participation. Although both are the two sides of the same coin, yet the representation part somehow became more effective, undermining the role of continuous participation in the political system. The meaning of political rights got reduced to the right to vote. You were supposed to elect someone to represent you, for a ve-year term and then just be apolitical after the elections are over. Politics was
LETTERS
neither your duty nor your right after that. The popular argument was that politics is a dirty game; civilised people should stay away from it. But this idea has witnessed a shift during the evolution of AAP. A young IITian and a former Indian revenue service ofcer led the political campaign, and college students, corporate professionals, university professors, lawyers along with the auto-drivers and class-IV employees joined the movement, and that too, of their own political will. Thus the AAP has opened the doors again for participatory democracy, which is a noteworthy shift in the political culture of India. Given all these facts, 2013 would denitely be remembered as a year of experiment in the political history of India. Aam aadmi has emerged as a new political identity. Delhi did not only vote for change but also for new dimensions of democracy. The patterns of demand and support have changed, and it is expected that the response and feedback would also change soon. Political parties would become more responsible and would address the demands of people in a logical way. Politics is not a dirty game anymore.
Aakansha Natani Research Scholar, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi
Child Marriage
he Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006 is apparently aimed at prohibiting marriage of any girl below 18 years of age and any boy below 21 years of age. However, according to the District Level Household and Facility Survey-3 (DLHS-3) data brought out in 2010, 43% of women in India aged 20-24 were married before 18 years. It is estimated that there are more than 23 million child brides in India, which is 40% of the child brides globally. In the last 15 years the decline in child marriage is 11%, which is less than 1% per year. The National Strategy Document on Prevention of Child Marriage 2013 highlights these statistics of child marriage prominently. Child marriage denies the child his/her basic right to good health, education,
EPW
nutrition and freedom and has an adverse impact on the physical, emotional and psychological development of children. Most of the evidence points out that child marriage makes girls more vulnerable to abuse, violence and exploitation as compared to boys. Despite the fact that a legislation prohibiting child marriage has been in place in the country since 1929, child marriage has been an accepted cultural norm in different parts of India in varying degrees. The very slow decline in the incidence of child marriage shows that the legislation which was brought in by the state and initiatives of the civil society has not led to the desired results in changing attitudes and norms. Along with the northern Indian states where the rate of child marriage has always been high, civil society organisations have noticed that there is an emerging trend of child marriage, especially of girls in states such as West Bengal and the southern states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, even in urban areas though not strictly restricted to these areas. The major reasons reported for the same have been the shrinking of living spaces, which is restricting household sizes, and concern for the security of adolescent girls. Recently, a global resolution was moved in the United Nations General Assembly, which was co-sponsored by 107 countries. Surprisingly, though the Government of India signed the resolution, it refused to co-sponsor the resolution in spite of the fact that India already has a declared position against marriages of girls less than 18 years and a law preventing it. Thus the stance taken by the government contradicts its own position and sends confusing signals of ownership and commitment of the government in preventing child marriages. Co-sponsoring a United
Nations resolution amounts to the government agreeing to it completely in letter and spirit rather than just signing it. The government said in its defence on not co-sponsoring, that the early marriage clause mentioned in the resolution was not acceptable to it, as it was of the opinion that it could be very contextual to different countries. It is necessary to address the issue of child marriage in an integrated manner in connection with the other related legislations such as: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) (2012), Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) (2006) and the exception of Section 375 Indian Penal Code (IPC), which legalises sexual intercourse within child marriage between 15 and 18 years. There is an ongoing public interest litigation, before the honourable Supreme Court (Independent Thought vs Union of India Civil Writ Petition 382 of 2013), demanding the declaration of the above IPC provision as unconstitutional in the light of POCSO and the larger state policy. Against this context, the members of civil society organisations met in New Delhi on 26 October and discussed the issue at length. We strongly condemn the government for not co-sponsoring the resolution, which shows the lack of ownership by the government on this serious issue.
Ajay Kumar Sinha, FLAIR Foundation; Vikram Srivastav, Independent Thought; Md Salam Khan, Bachpan Bachao Andolan; Nikhil Verma, All India Institute of Local Self Government; Jasleen Klu, World Vision; Arvind Singh, Matrisudha; Jarjum Ete, ICCE-AP; Manish Kumar, SPYM; Resmi Bhaskaran, Freelance Consultant; Sindhu Nambiath, Researcher; Shashi Obeid, Nafees Ahmad, Kumud Prabha, Neera Arora, YWCA; Alex George, Avinash Singh, Dipali Sharma, Sameet Panda, ActionAid India
Web Exclusives
The following articles have been uploaded in the past week in the Web Exclusives section of the EPW website. They have not been published in the print edition. (1) Indian Migrant Workers Rioting in Singapore: Revisiting Acculturation Paradigms Rajiv Aricat (2) A Nicobarese Tribal Leader Who Lived Two Lives Ajay Saini Articles posted before 21 December 2013 remain available in the Web Exclusives section.
vol xlviII no 52
LETTERS
Subscription Rates
(Revised rates effective November 1, 2013)
Web Edition/Digital Archives
Print + Digital Archives 1,300
The full content of the EPW and the entire archives are also available to those who do not wish to subscribe to the print edition.
India (in Rs) Category Number of Concurrent Users Up to Five More than 5 Individuals Single User 2,750 6,600 1,100 More than 5 Single User 55 22 SAARC (in US $) Number of Concurrent Users Rest of the World (in US $) Number of Concurrent Users Up to Five More than 5 Single User 220 450 45
Institutions
Concessional rates are restricted to students in India. To subscribe at concessional rates, please submit proof of eligibility from an institution. Print Edition: All subscribers to the print edition can download from the web, without making any extra payment, articles published in the previous two calendar years. Print plus Digital Archives: Subscriber receives the print copy and has access to the entire archives on the EPW web site.
How to Subscribe:
Payment can be made by either sending a demand draft/cheque in favour of Economic and Political Weekly or by making online payment with a credit card/net banking on our secure site at www.epw.in. (For Inland subscriptions if making payment by cheque, please add Rs 35 to cheques drawn on banks outside Mumbai, when collection is not at par).
Print Edition For SAARC and Rest of the World (Air Mail)
Airmail Subscription for One Year (in US $)
Print (Plus free web access to issues of previous two years) Institutions SAARC Rest of the World Individuals SAARC Rest of the World 150 275 120 185 Print + Digital Archives (According to Number of Concurrent Users) Up to 5 330 More than 5 175 550 Single User
320-321, A to Z Industrial Estate Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400 013, India
General Guidelines
Writers are requested to provide full details for correspondence: postal address, day-time phone numbers and email address. EPW requests writers not to send revised versions based on stylistic changes/additions, deletions of references, minor changes, etc, as this poses challenges in processing. Revised versions will not be processed. When there are major developments in the field of study after the first submission, authors can send a revised version.
Special Articles
welcomes original research papers in any of the social sciences. Articles must be no more than 8,000 words, including notes and references. Longer articles will not be processed. Contributions should be sent preferably by email. Special articles should be accompanied by an abstract of a maximum of 150-200 words. Papers should not have been simultaneously submitted for publication to another journal or newspaper. If the paper has appeared earlier in a different version, we would appreciate a copy of this along with the submitted paper. Graphs and charts need to be prepared in MS Office (Word/Excel) and not in jpeg or other formats. Receipt of articles will be immediately acknowledged by email. Every effort is taken to complete early processing of the papers we receive. However, we receive 70 articles every week and adequate time has to be provided for internal reading and external refereeing. It can therefore take up to four months for a final
EPW
Commentary
EPW
invites short contributions to the Commentary section on topical social, economic and political developments. These should ideally be between 1,000 and 2,500 words. A decision on Commentary-length articles will be communicated within 6-8 weeks, or earlier.
Copyright
EPW posts all published articles on its website and may reproduce them on CDs. EPW also posts all published articles on select databases. Copyright of all articles published in the Journal belongs to the author or to the organisation where the author is employed as determined by the authors terms of employment.
Keywords
Authors are requested to list six to eight keywords for their articles.
Book Reviews
EPW
sends out books for review. It does not normally accept unsolicited reviews. However, all reviews that are received are read with interest and unsolicited review on occasion is considered for publication.
Discussion
encourages researchers to comment on articles published in EPW. Submissions should be 800 to 1,600 words.
EPW
Letters
Readers of EPW are encouraged to comment (300 words) on published articles. All letters should have the writers full name and postal address.
december 28, 2013