Lecture 23
Page 1 of 17
(Fig. 5.71) As we discussed in the previous lecture, there are three distinct region of frequency operation for this and most transistor amplifier circuits. Well examine the operation of this CE
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 2 of 17
RL = ro || RC || RL Vo = g m RLV
(1) (2)
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 3 of 17
V =
(3)
Substituting (3) into (2) we find the mid-band voltage gain Am to be V g m r RB ( ro || RC || RL ) (4) Am o = Vsig r + rx + RB || Rsig RB + Rsig
(Fig. 5.72a)
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 4 of 17
Well simplify this circuit a little by calculating a Thvenin equivalent circuit at the input and using the definition for RL in (1):
where it can be easily shown that Vsig is V given in (3) r RB Vsig = Vsig (5.167),(5) r + rx + RB || Rsig RB + Rsig while
Rsig = r || rx + ( RB || Rsig )
(Fig. 5.72b)
(5.168),(6)
Millers Theorem
We can analyze the circuit in Fig. 5.72b through traditional methods, but if we apply Millers theorem we can greatly simplify the effort. Plus, it will be easier to apply an approximation that will arise if we use Millers theorem. You may have seen Millers theorem previously in circuit analysis. It is another equivalent circuit theorem for linear
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 5 of 17
circuits akin to Thvenins and Nortons theorems. Millers theorem applies to this circuit topology:
(7),(8)
The equivalence of these two circuits can be easily verified. For example, using KVL in Fig. 1 v A = i A Z x + vB v v (9) or iA = A B Zx while using KVL in the left-hand figure of Fig. 2 gives
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 6 of 17
iA =
vA ZA
(10)
Now, for the left-hand figure to be equivalent to the circuit in Fig. 1, then iA in (9) and iA in (10) must be equal. Therefore, v A vB v A = Zx ZA The equivalent impedance ZA can be obtained from this equation as Zv Zx ZA = x A = v A vB 1 vB vA which is the same as (7). A similar result verifies (8). So, for a resistive element Rx, Millers theorem states that Rx Rx and RB = (12),(13) RA = vB vA 1 1 vA vB while for a capacitive element Cx, Millers theorem states that v v C A = C x 1 B and CB = Cx 1 A (14),(15) vA vB
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 7 of 17
(16),(17)
Actually, this equivalent circuit of Fig. 3 is no simpler to analyze than the one in Fig. 5.72b because of the dependence of CA and CB on the voltages Vo and V. However, this equivalent circuit of Fig. 3 will prove valuable for the following approximation. Note from Fig. 5.72b that I L + I = g mV I L = g mV I (18)
Up to frequencies near fH and better, the current I in the small capacitor C will be much smaller than g mV . Consequently, from (18)
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 8 of 17
and
I L g mV Vo I L RL = g m RLV
(19) (5.169),(20)
Most often for this type of amplifier, g m RL 1 so that in (22) CB C . But as we initially assumed, the current through C is much smaller than that through the dependent current source g mV , which ultimately led to equation (19). Consequently, we can ignore CB in parallel with g mV and the final high frequency small-signal equivalent circuit for the CE amplifier in Fig. 5.71a is
Using this last result in (16) and (17) we find that g R V C A C 1 + m L = C 1 + g m RL V V 1 C B C 1 + and = C 1 + g R V g R m L m L
(21) (22)
(Fig. 5.72c)
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
where
Cin C + C A = C + C 1 + g m RL
Page 9 of 17
(5.173),(22)
Based on this small-signal equivalent circuit, well derive the high-frequency response of this CE amplifier. At the input Z Cin (23) V = Vsig Z Cin + Rsig while at the output
Vo = g m RLV
(24)
Since Z Cin = ( jCin ) then (25) becomes 1 g m RL jCin Vo = g m RL Vsig = Vsig 1 1 + jCin Rsig + Rsig jCin If we define 1 H = Cin Rsig
1
Vo = g m RL
Z Cin Z Cin
+ Rsig
Vsig
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 10 of 17
where
fH =
1 H = 2 2 Cin Rsig
(5.176),(29)
You should recognize this transfer function (28) as that for a low pass circuit with a cut-off frequency (or 3-dB frequency) of H. This is the response of a single time constant circuit, which is what we have in the circuit of Fig. 5.72c. What were ultimately interested in is the overall transfer function Vo Vsig from input to output. This can be easily derived from the work weve already done here. Since Vo Vo Vsig = (30) Vsig Vsig Vsig We can use (28) for the first term in the RHS of (30), and use (5) for the second giving Vo r g m RL RB (31) = Vsig 1 + j f r + rx + RB || Rsig RB + Rsig fH We can recognize Am from (4) in this expression giving Vo Am = (5.175),(32) Vsig 1 + j f fH Once again, this is the frequency response of a low pass circuit, as shown below:
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 11 of 17
(Fig. 5.72d)
The reason that CA undergoes this multiplication is because it is connected between two nodes (B and C in Fig. 5.72a) that experience a large voltage gain. This effect is called the
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 12 of 17
Miller effect and the multiplying factor 1 + g m RL in (22) is called the Miller multiplier.
Because of this Miller effect and the Miller multiplier, the input capacitance Cin of the CE amplifier is usually quite large. Consequently, from (20) the fH of this amplifier is reduced. In other words, this Miller effect limits the high frequency applications of the CE amplifier because the bandwidth and gain will be limited.
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 13 of 17
The text presents an approximate solution in which the low frequency response is modeled as the product of three high pass single time constant circuits cascaded together so that Vo j j j (5.183),(33) Am Vsig j + p1 j + p 2 j + p 3
(Fig. 5.73e) So there isnt a single fL as suggested by Fig. 5.71b but rather a more complicated response at low frequencies as we see in Fig. 5.73e above. Computer simulation is perhaps the best predictor for this complicated frequency response, but an approximate formula for fL is given in the text as 1 1 1 1 + + f L f p1 + f p 2 + f p 3 = 2 CC1RC1 CE RE CC 2 RC 2 (5.184),(5.185),(34) where RC1 , RE , and RC 2 are the resistances seen by CC1 , CE , and CC 2 , respectively, with the signal source Vsig = 0 and the other two capacitors replaced by short circuits.
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 14 of 17
Example N23.1. Compute the mid-band small-signal voltage gain and the upper 3-dB cutoff frequency of the small-signal voltage gain for the CE amplifier shown in Fig. 5.71a. Use a 2N2222A transistor and the circuit element and DC source values listed in Example 5.18 in the text. Use 10 F blocking and bypass capacitors.
AC
AC AC1 Start=100 Hz Stop=1.0 MHz Step=100 Hz R R2 R=8 kOhm vo C C2 C=10 uF C C1 C=10 uF R R1 R=100 kOhm ap_npn_2N2222A_19930601 Q1 C I_DC C3 SRC4 Idc=1 mA C=10 uF R R4 R=5 kOhm
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 15 of 17
From Fig. 9 in the Motorola 2N2222A datasheet (see the previous set of lecture notes) For VCB = 2.43 V Ccb = C 5.8 pF. For VBE = 0.62 V Ceb = C 20 pF.
gm =
From (5.163),
fT
IC 1 mA = = 0.04 S VT 25 mV
This value agrees fairly with the datasheet value of 300 MHz.
0 265 from the ADS parts list for this 2N2222A transistor.
Therefore,
r =
gm
From the 2N2222A datasheet, the nominal output resistance at IC = 1 mA is ro 50 k. What about rx? Its so small in value (~ 50 ) that well easily be able to ignore it for the Am calculations compared to r (which is 6,625 as we just calculated). From (4),
Whites, EE 320
Lecture 23
Page 16 of 17
Am =
Am = 20 log10 (
Am = 64.24
0.9524
V V Am ) = 36.2 dB
m3
1E4 freq, Hz
1E5
1E6
From this plot, ADS computes a mid-band gain of Am = 36.05 dB, which agrees closely with the predicted value above. From (29),
fH
2 Cin Rsig
Whites, EE 320
= 20 + 678.3 = 698.3 pF while from (6) Rsig = r || rx + ( RB || Rsig ) Because RB || Rsig = 100 k || 5 k = 4,761.9 is so much larger than rx (on the order of 50 ), we can safely ignore rx. Then, Rsig 6,625 || 4,762 = 2,771 .
Lecture 23
Page 17 of 17
Therefore,
f H 2 698.3 1012 2,771 = 82.25 kHz This agrees very closely with the value of 84.40 kHz predicted by the ADS simulation shown above.