, R.Z. Wang, Y. Li
Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 March 2008
Keywords:
One-rotor two stage
Rotary desiccant
Rotation speed
Wheel thickness
Moisture removal
Thermal coefcient of performance
a b s t r a c t
A one-rotor two-stage rotary desiccant cooling system (OTSDC), in which two-stage dehumidication
process is realized by one desiccant wheel, was investigated experimentally. The system was proposed
to reduce the volume of two-stage rotary desiccant cooling system (TSDC) with two desiccant wheels
without reduction in system performance by using the novel conguration. An experimental setup was
designed and built to evaluate the system performance under various operation conditions. The effects
of different wheel thicknesses at various rotation speeds under Air-conditioning and Refrigeration
Institute (ARI) summer and humid conditions were investigated. It is observed that there exits an
optimal rotation speed where moisture removal of the system D and thermal coefcient of performance
COP
th
are both optimal. Moreover, the unit with wheel thickness of 100 mm performs better for its
bigger moisture removal D and higher COP
th
. Generally speaking, the COP
th
of this unit is around 1.0
when the regeneration temperature is lower than 801C. Compared to TSDC, the OTSDC not only
preserves the merits of low regeneration temperature and high COP
th
, but also has a reduced size by
about half.
& 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The world is facing a large-scale and potentially devastating
global energy crisis. People have already realized that traditional
resource such as oil and gas cannot meet the rising energy
demand. This has led to increasing interest in alternate-energy
research such as solar energy, geothermal energy and wind
energy. Besides, traditional resource has caused serious environ-
mental problems. In response to these problems, rotary desiccant
cooling systems, which adopt water as refrigerant and can be
driven by low-grade thermal energy, have been widely recognized
as a promising technology for its energy saving and chlorouoro-
carbons (CFC)-free characteristics. Researchers have carried out
some investigation on one-stage rotary desiccant cooling system
such as system simulation [13], thermodynamic analysis based
on the second law [4] and experimental investigation [5,6].
Recently, many researchers focus on the concepts of staged
regeneration and two-stage system. Staged regeneration for solid
desiccant dehumidiers, patented by Glav [7], has been reintro-
duced [811]. Collier and Cohen [8] reported that the best system
performance could be obtained by staging the regeneration
process while minimizing the amount of inert heat capacity.
Worek et al. [9] indicated that high performance for a ventilation
cycle could be achieved by using Type 1M material regenerated at
1651C, with a staged regeneration fraction of 16%. Moreover, there
are also some investigations focusing on two-stage solid desiccant
cooling system. Meckler [12] proposed an integrated two-stage
desiccant dehumidication system with a commercial HVAC
system, which would signicantly increase thermal coefcient
of performance (COP
th
) and lower initial equipment cost. Gershon
Meckler Associates, P.C. (GMAPC) [13] has developed a two-stage
desiccant unit for small commercial building such as fast-food
restaurants. The results showed that the annual electric energy
use by the desiccant unit is 60% less than that of the vapor
compression unit; annual energy cost for the gas-energized
desiccant cold-air unit is 40% less than that of the conventional
unit. Afterwards, a two-stage solid desiccant HVAC system
including evaporative cooling was compared with conventional
all-air VAV system by Mei et al. [13]. It was demonstrated that the
energy consumption in desiccant system is reduced signicantly
in terms of peak electric demand, electric and gas energy input
and annual energy costs.
Lately, researchers in Shanghai Jiao Tong University have
developed a novel two-stage rotary desiccant cooling system
(TSDC) by using novel conguration and newly developed
composite desiccant material. The experimental results showed
the system has the merits of lower regeneration temperature and
high thermal performance [14]. Hence low-grade thermal energy
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/energy
Energy
0360-5442/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.006
M
ads
rh
1
h
5
M
reg1
rh
9
h
8
M
reg2
rh
13
h
12
(2)
Here r is the density of air in kg/m
3
. The uncertainties in the
experimental results were caused by errors in the primary
measurements. Kline and McClitock [18] derived the following
expressions (Eqs. (3) and (4)) to calculate the experimental
accuracy:
Dy
qf
qx
1
_ _
2
Dx
1
qf
qx
2
_ _
2
Dx
2
2
qf
qx
n
_ _
2
Dx
n
2
_ _
1=2
(3)
Dy
y
qf
qx1
_ _
2
Dx
1
y
_ _
2
qf
qx2
_ _
2
Dx
2
y
_ _
2
qf
qxn
_ _
2
Dxn
y
_ _
2
_
_
_
_
1=2
(4)
f is the function of independent variables; x
1
, x
2
, etc. stand for the
variables of the function; Dx
1
, Dx
2
, etc. are the absolute error
associated with the variables and Dy/y means the relative error.
Based on these relationships, a detailed error analysis
indicated that the overall uncertainty was within 79.39% for
the experimental moisture removal D and 711.03% for the
experimental COP
th
.
Moreover, the measurement error is also affected by the
propriety of the sensor installation. Particularly, the accuracy of
the air ux evaluation from air velocity measurement depends
largely on uniformity of the velocity eld. Energy and mass
balance between the process air and regeneration air in the heat
exchangers as well as in the desiccant rotors were carefully
examined to verify the accuracy of air ow rate. The energy and
mass change of process air and regeneration air in different
components can be expressed by the following equations:
DQ
ads=reg
jM
ads=reg;out
r
ads=reg;out
h
ads=reg;out
M
ads=reg;in
r
ads=reg;in
h
ads=reg;in
j (5)
Dd
ads=reg
jM
ads=reg;out
r
ads=reg;out
d
ads=reg;out
M
ads=reg;in
r
ads=reg;in
d
ads=reg;in
j (6)
In a series of operating conditions, Fig. 5 depicts the experi-
mental results in terms of energy and mass change in process air
side (DQ
ads,DW
, DQ
ads,HE1
, DQ
ads,HE2
, Dd
ads,DW
) and the correspond-
ing results in regeneration air side (DQ
reg,DW
, DQ
reg1,HE
, DQ
reg2,HE
,
Dd
reg,DW
). It is shown that the results agree well and the
discrepancy between the results is less than 7% for heat balance
and less than 5% for mass balance.
5. Experimental results and discussions
The performance of OTSDC with wheel thickness changing
from 40 to 100mm was tested under ARI summer and humid
conditions. The operating conditions are listed in Table 3. During
the testing, it took about 20min for the OTSDC to reach steady
state.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-7%
+7%
E
n
e
r
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
r
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
i
r
(
k
W
)
Energy change in process air (kW)
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
-5%
+5%
M
a
s
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
r
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
i
r
(
k
g
/
h
)
Mass change in process air (kg/h)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
1 2 3 4 5
Fig. 5. Comparisons between (a) energy change in process air and regeneration air
side and (b) mass change in process air and regeneration air side.
T.S. Ge et al. / Energy 33 (2008) 18071815 1811
5.1. Effect of rotation speed
It was reported that rotation speed is a crucial operating
parameter, which affects system performance signicantly and
there exists an optimal rotation speed for one-stage system at
which moisture removal achieves a maximum [19,20]. Since two
stages are realized in one rotary wheel, the effect of rotation speed
might be different. Therefore effects of rotation speed on system
performance including moisture removal D and COP
th
were tested
with different wheel thicknesses.
Figs. 6 and 7 depict the experimental results under ARI
summer and humid condition. The rotation speed varies in the
range of 220r/h. The results indicate that the inuences
of rotation speed on system performance are similar under
ARI summer and humid condition: (1) there exists optimal
rotation speed under the testing condition at which system could
obtain not only the greatest moisture removal but also the highest
COP
th
. (2) For the same wheel thickness, when regeneration
temperature is between 50 and 901C, optimal rotation speed
increases slightly when regeneration temperature increases. This
is mainly because desiccant material can be better regenerated at
higher regeneration temperature and in that case, rotation speed
should increase to drive the well-regenerated desiccant out of
regeneration sector in time. (3) For the same regeneration
temperature, optimal rotation speed increases with a decrease
of wheel thickness. If the wheel is too thick, heat and mass
transfer are worse at the segment near the exit. As a result lower
rotation speed is required for the air and desiccant to have more
time to contact.
Jia [15] and Jia et al. [16] investigated the effect of rotation
speed on moisture removal of one-stage composite rotary
desiccant system. It was found that the optimal rotation speed
for one-stage system with a wheel thickness of 100mm is in the
range of 816r/h under ARI summer condition. Under similar
condition, the obtained optimal rotation speed of OTSDC is
between 4 and 8r/h, which is smaller than the former one. The
results may be caused by the smaller angle in circumferential
direction both for process and regeneration air in OTSDC.
5.2. Effect of wheel thickness
System performances with respect to different wheel thick-
nesses L under two ARI conditions are depicted in Figs. 8(a) and
(b). All the results are obtained at the condition of optimal
rotation speed. It can be seen that the peak moisture removal
increases with increasing wheel thickness under the experimental
conditions. The OTSDC with thickness of 100mm shows better
moisture removal capacity. This is mainly because more desiccant
material is adopted to dehumidify process air by using thick
desiccant wheel. Also, under ARI summer and humid condition, if
the wheel thickness varies from 40 to 70mm, COP
th
increases by
about 0.1 and 0.15, respectively. However, when L further
increases from 70 to 100mm, COP
th
almost keeps constant. This
means although much more latent load has been handled, its
increase is not signicant compared to the increase in required
regeneration heat under this condition.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 3
Operating conditions for experiment runs under typical conditions (Figs. 69)
Operation parameters Baseline values
Process air inlet temperature (ARI summer) 35.01C
Process air inlet humidity ratio (ARI summer) 14.3g/kg
Process air inlet temperature (ARI humid) 30.0 1C
Process air inlet humidity ratio (ARI humid) 16.2g/kg
Return air (indoor air) temperature (summer & humid) 26.7 1C
Return air humidity ratio 11.1g/kg
Enthalpy of indoor air 55.2 kJ/kg
Process air ux 360m
3
/h
Regeneration air ux in desiccant wheel (M
9
/M
13
) 135m
3
/h
Regeneration air ux in heat exchanger M
7
/M
11
360m
3
/h
Regeneration temperature (T
9
/T
13
) 50.090.01C
0
3
6
9
12
D
COPth
ARI summer condition L = 100mm
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
Treg (C)
50 70 90
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
0
3
6
9
12
ARI Summer condition L = 70mm
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
4
0
3
6
9
12
ARI summer condition L = 40mm
Rotation Speed (r/h)
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
8 12 16 20
4
Rotation Speed (r/h)
8 12 16 20
4
Rotation Speed (r/h)
8 12 16 20
Fig. 6. Effect of rotation speed on system performance under ARI summer
condition with respect to different wheel thicknesses: (a) L 100, (b) L 70 and
(c) L 40mm.
T.S. Ge et al. / Energy 33 (2008) 18071815 1812
5.3. Effect of regeneration temperature
Fig. 9 summarizes the optimal results with different regenera-
tion temperatures. As expected, moisture removal capacity
enhances under the condition of higher regeneration temperature.
However, the increase of thermal energy consumption is more
signicant. Therefore, high regeneration temperature results in
lower COP
th
.
5.4. System performance analysis
In order to evaluate the performance of OTSDC more
comprehensively, the outlet process air condition as well as COP
th
at the optimal rotation speed are summarized in Table 4. In
addition, the overall COP taking account of the electrical power
(three fans of 250W and one motor of 200W) are calculated and
listed in Table 4. As listed in Table 3, the enthalpy of indoor air is
about 55.2kJ/kg. Therefore when h
5
is less than 55.2kJ/kg, OTSDC
can provide a satisfactory supply of air by using a direct
evaporative cooler. It is indicated in Table 2 that under ARI
summer condition, the OTSDC with thickness of 100, 70 and
40mm can provide satisfactory supply of air if regeneration
temperatures are higher than 60, 60 and 801C, respectively.
Meanwhile, system COP
th
is almost higher than 0.8 and it can
reach 1.17 due to the lower regeneration temperature. On the
other hand, for ARI humid condition, if regeneration temperature
is higher than 701C, the OTSDC with thickness of 70 and 100mm
can provide satisfactory supply of air and COP
th
is higher than 0.85
under testing conditions.
Experimental results of one-stage desiccant wheel cooling
system (OSDC) [15] as well as TSDC [14] under ARI summer
condition with wheel thickness of 100mm are listed in Table 5.
Compared to the obtained results of OTSDC, it can be found that:
(1) OTSDC is superior to OSDC. For a similar moisture removal
capacity (D 4.58g/kg), regeneration temperature and COP
th
of
OTSDC are 601C and 1.17, respectively. The corresponding values
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0
3
6
9
12
D
COPth
ARI summer condition L = 100mm
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
Treg (C)
50 70 90
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
0
3
6
9
12
ARI Summer condition L = 70mm
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
4
0
3
6
9
12
ARI summer condition L = 40mm
Rotation Speed (r/h)
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
8 12 16 20
4
Rotation Speed (r/h)
8 12 16 20
4
Rotation Speed (r/h)
8 12 16 20
Fig. 7. Effect of rotation speed on system performance under ARI humid condition
with respect to different wheel thicknesses: (a) L 100 (b) L 70 and (c)
L 40mm.
40
0
3
6
9
12
ARI summer condition
Wheel thickness L (mm)
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
0
3
6
9
12
ARI humid condition
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
D
COPth
Treg (C)
50 70 90
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
70 100
40
Wheel thickness L (mm)
70 100
Fig. 8. Effect of rotation speed on system performance under (a) ARI summer
condition and (b) ARI humid condition.
T.S. Ge et al. / Energy 33 (2008) 18071815 1813
of OSDC are 901C, which is 33% higher and 0.98, which is 16%
lower. (2) Under a similar condition, moisture removal of the
OTSDC is similar to that of TSDC but the COP
th
is higher. This is
mainly due to the higher efciency of heat exchanger in the
present experimental setup. Therefore, OTSDC inherits the merits
of two-stage system: low regeneration temperature and high
COP
th
at low regeneration temperature. This means that low-grade
thermal energy can also be efciently utilized and the operating
costs can be signicantly reduced. (3) The size of the OTSDC is
efciently reduced, which is only about half (2m0.9m0.8m)
of TSDC (2m0.95m1.5m).
6. Conclusion
In this paper, a one-rotor two-stage rotary desiccant cooling
system (OTSDC) is proposed and investigated experimentally. By
dividing the cross-section of one desiccant wheel into four parts,
two-stage dehumidication process can be realized in one wheel.
An experimental setup of this system has been built and tested
under ARI summer and humid conditions with respect to different
wheel thicknesses. System performance is evaluated in terms of
moisture removal D and thermal coefcient of performance COP
th
.
As a brief summary, the basic results are listed as follows:
(1) Realization of two-stage dehumidication process by one
rotary wheel is feasible.
(2) There exits an optimal rotation speed to obtain the biggest
moisture removal and the highest COP
th
. The optimal rotation
speed increases with an increase of regeneration temperature
ARTICLE IN PRESS
50
0
3
6
9
12
ARI summer condition
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
D
COPth
L (mm)
40 70 100
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
50
0
3
6
9
12
ARI humid condition
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
g
/
k
g
)
D
COPth
L (mm)
40 70 100
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
C
O
P
t
h
Regeneration temperature (C)
60 70 80 90
Regeneration temperature (C)
60 70 80 90
Fig. 9. Effect of regeneration temperature on system performance: (a) ARI summer
condition and (b) ARI humid condition.
Table 4
Experimental results under ARI summer and humid condition
L (mm) T
reg
(1C) ARI summer ARI humid
d
5
(g/kg) H
5
(kJ/kg) COP
th
COP d
5
(g/kg) H
5
(kJ/kg) COP
th
COP
100 50 10.51 56.35 1.38 0.80 12.37 60.28 1.27 0.70
60 9.52 54.38 1.17 0.76 10.53 56.40 1.11 0.69
70 7.93 51.34 1.03 0.74 9.07 53.83 1.02 0.69
80 6.78 49.34 0.95 0.71 7.74 51.70 0.93 0.68
90 5.55 47.28 0.87 0.68 6.60 49.34 0.88 0.67
70 50 11.26 58.06 1.32 0.74 12.63 60.82 1.25 0.68
60 10.12 55.78 1.13 0.72 10.95 57.00 1.08 0.67
70 8.80 53.39 1.01 0.70 9.53 54.72 0.99 0.67
80 7.42 50.80 0.94 0.69 8.34 52.91 0.92 0.66
90 6.16 48.47 0.86 0.66 7.21 50.61 0.86 0.65
40 50 12.31 60.45 1.22 0.66 13.95 63.83 1.09 0.55
60 11.26 58.06 1.03 0.64 12.33 60.50 0.91 0.54
70 10.38 56.91 0.96 0.62 11.17 58.29 0.8 0.53
80 9.54 55.66 0.87 0.60 10.64 58.31 0.73 0.50
90 8.58 54.05 0.78 0.58 9.58 56.31 0.68 0.49
The bold numbers are satisfactory supply of air.
Table 5
COP
th
of OSDC and TSDC under ARI summer condition [14,15]
T
reg
(1C) D (g/kg) Dd
ads
(kg/h)
COP
th
OSDC (M
ads
360m
3
/h
M
reg
160170m
3
/h)
50 1.83 0.79 1.39
60 2.48 1.07 1.23
70 3.53 1.52 1.12
80 4.11 1.78 1.03
90 4.58 1.98 0.98
TSDC (M
ads
360m
3
/h
M
reg
130140m
3
/h)
50 3.31 1.43 1.33
60 4.53 1.94 1.16
70 6.70 2.89 1.04
80
7.85
3.39 0.85
90
8.41
3.63 0.71
T.S. Ge et al. / Energy 33 (2008) 18071815 1814
and decrease of wheel thickness. The optimal rotation speed
with wheel thickness of 100mm is in the range 48r/h under
ARI summer and humid condition.
(3) Under testing conditions, the system with wheel thickness of
100mm performs better than the one with 70mm as well as
40 mm. This can provide satisfactory supply of air when
regeneration temperatures are higher than 60 and 701C under
ARI summer and humid condition, respectively. Besides, high
COP
th
can be obtained under lower regeneration temperature.
(4) Compared to the performance of OSDC and TSDC, the
investigated OTSDC inherits the merits of two-stage dehumi-
dication system: low regeneration temperature and high
COP
th
. The most important one is the size of OTSDC is only half
of that of TSDC.
In conclusion, the novel OTSDC achieves the objective of
reducing the size of two-stage system with no reduction in
system performance.
Acknowledgement
We deeply appreciate the nancial support of Daikin Company
for the National Key Technologies R&D Program under Contract
no. 2006BAA04B03.
References
[1] Charoensupaya D, Worek WM. Parametric study of an open-cycle adiabatic,
solid, desiccant cooling system. Energy 1988;13(9):73947.
[2] Elsayed SS, Hamamoto Y, Akisawa A, Kashiwagi T. Analysis of an air cycle
refrigerator driving air conditioning system integrated desiccant system. Int
J Refrig 2006;29:21928.
[3] Zhang LZ. Energy performance of independent air dehumidication systems
with energy recovery measures. Energy 2006;31(8-9):122842.
[4] Lior N, Al-Sharqawi HS. Exergy analysis of ow dehumidication by solid
desiccants. Energy 2005;30(6):91531.
[5] Jalalzadeh Azar AA, Steele WG, Hodge BK. Performance characteristics of a
commercially available gas-red desiccant system. ASHRAE Trans 2000;106:
95104.
[6] Lu SM, Shyu RJ, Yan WJ, Chung TW. Development and experimental validation
of two novel solar desiccant-dehumidication-regeneration systems. Energy
1995;20(8):7517.
[7] Glav BO. Air Conditioning Apparatus. US Patent 3251402, May 17, 1966.
[8] Collier RK, Cohen BM. An analytical examination of methods for improving
the performance of desiccant cooling systems. J Sol Energy Eng 1991;113:
15163.
[9] Worek WM, Zheng W, Belding WA, Novosel D, Holeman WD. Simulation of
advanced gas-red desiccant systems. ASHRAE Trans 1991;97(2):60914.
[10] Worek WM, Zheng W. Open cycle desiccant cooling systems. US Patent
5526251, June 18, 1996. See also: /http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/
5526651.htmlS.
[11] Worek WM, Zheng W. Open cycle desiccant cooling process. US Patent
5542259, August 6, 1996. See also: /http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/
5542259.htmlS.
[12] Meckler G. Two-stage desiccant dehumidication in commercial building
HVAC systems. ASHRAE Trans 1989;95(2):111623.
[13] Mei VC, Chen FC, Lavan Z, Collier RK, Meckler G. An assessment of desiccant
cooling and dehumidication technology. OAK Ridge National Laboratory,
1992, available to public from the National Technical Information Service, US
Department of Commerce, 52825 Port Royal Rd., Springeld, VA 22161.
[14] Ge TS, Li Y, Wang RZ, Dai YJ. Experimental study on a novel two-stage
desiccant cooling system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IIR international
congress of refrigeration, Beijing, China, 2007, ICR07-E1-826.
[15] Jia CX. Study on reinforcement dehumidication mechanism of composite
desiccant based on silica gel and application. PhD thesis, Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2006. p. 8096
[in Chinese].
[16] Jia CX, Dai YJ, Wu JY, Wang RZ. Use of compound desiccant to develop high
performance desiccant cooling system. Int J Refrig 2007;30:34553.
[17] Shanghai T-Yacht Refrigeration Equipment CO.LTD. Products. Shanghai China,
2008. See also: /http://www.tyacht.com.cn/ty/en/index.aspS.
[18] Kline SJ, McClintock FA. Describing uncertainties in single sample experi-
ments. Mech Eng 1953;78:38.
[19] Zheng W, Worek WM, Novesel D. Performance optimization of rotary
dehumidier. J Sol Energy Eng 1995;117:404.
[20] Vineyard EA, Sand JR, Durfee DJ. Parametric analysis of variables that affect
the performance of a desiccant dehumidication system. ASHRAE Trans
2000;106:8794.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T.S. Ge et al. / Energy 33 (2008) 18071815 1815