13 ALEKO E. LILIUS, for himself and as guardian ad litem of his minor hild, !ri"a Marianne Lilius, and SO#$A MARIA LILIUS, plaintiffs appellees, vs. MA#ILA RAILROA% COM&A#', !efen!ant. LAURA LI#%LE' S(UMA#, MA#ILA )I#E MERC(A#*S, L*%., !A#K O+ *(E &(ILI&&I#E ISLA#%S A#% MA#ILA MO*OR CO., I#C., intervenors appellants, an! ).(. )A*EROUS, M. MAR+ORI, $O(# R. MC+IE, $R., ERLA#,ER - ,ALI#,ER, I#C., &(ILI&&I#E E%UCA*IO# CO., I#C., (AMIL*O# !RO)# S(OE CO., ES*RELLA %EL #OR*E and EAS*ER# - &(ILI&&I#E S(I&&I#, A,E#CIES, L*%., intervenors appellees.
FACTS: In G.R. No. L-39587, Aleko E. Lilius, a well-known and reputed journalist, author and photographer and a staff correspondent in the Far East of the magazines The American Weekly of New York and The Sphere of London, his wife Sonja Maria Lilius, who helps edit Aleko s work, his translator, and acting secretar!, and their daughter, ri!a Marianne Lilius, met an accident, wherein their Studebaker car, collided with locomoti"e No# $%&, 'anila (ailroad )ompan! s train# *he! sustained life-threatening wounds, fractures and other injuries, which left them permanentl! disfigured and as a result thereof, Aleko suffered great financial loss as he was una+le to concentrate and write articles and short stories for the newspapers and magazines# *he ,upreme )ourt ruled in fa"or of Aleko Lilius, et al, awarding them in the amount of -&&,./.#0& as damages, including interest and costs# In G.R. No. "#55$, herein case, Laura Lindle! ,human, the 'anila 1ine 'erchants, Ltd#, the 2ank of the -hilippine Islands and the Manila Mo!or Co.% &n'., ha"e appealed from an order of the )ourt of First Instance of 'anila fi3ing the degree of preference of the claimants and distri+uting the proceeds of the judgment of this court in the case of Lilius vs. Manila Railroad Co. For its part, 'anila 'otor )o#, Inc# claims that the lower court erred in not holding their claims, e"idenced +! pu+lic instruments and final judgment, as preferred o"er all other claims against Aleko E# Lilius# In support of its claim of preference against the fund of Aleko E# Lilius was a 'er!i(ie) 'o*+ o( i!s ju),-en! against him in ci"il case No# 4%%.5 of the )ourt of First Instance of 'anila, together with a 'er!i(ie) 'o*+ o( !.e /ri! o( e0e'u!ion and the ,arnis.-en! issued +! "irtue of said judgment# *he alleged *u1li' )o'u-en! e"idencing its claim was not offered in e"idence +ut, in their +rief in this court, counsel for the 'otor )o#, Inc#, merely assume that its credit is e"idenced +! a pu+lic document dated ma! %0, %5&%, +ecause the court, in its judgment in said ci"il case No# 4%%.5, refers to a mortgage appearing in the evidence as Exhibit A, as the +asis of its judgment, without mentioning the date of the e3ecution of the e3hi+it# &SS2E: 1hether the reference to a mortgage appearing in a pu+lic document in a judgment, entitled to preference under article %5/4 of the )i"il )ode# 3EL4: N6# *his reference in said judgment to a mortgage is not competent or satisfactor! e"idence as against third persons upon which to +ase a finding that the 'anila 'otor )ompan!7s credit e"idenced +! a pu+lic document within the meaning of article %5/4 of the )i"il )ode# If the 'anila motor )o#, Inc#, desired to rel! upon a pu+lic document in the form of a mortgage as esta+lishing its preference in this case, it should ha"e offered that document in e"idence, so that the court might satisf! itself as to its nature and un8uestiona+l! fi3 the date of its e3ecution# 9nder section 5 of Act o. !5"# as amended by Act o. $%&' , a '.a!!el )oes no! .a5e !o 1e a'kno/le),e) 1e(ore a no!ar+ *u1li'. As a,ains! 're)i!ors an) su1se6uen! en'u-1ran'es% !.e la/ )oes re6uire an a((i)a5i! o( ,oo) (ai!. a**en)e) !o !.e -or!,a,e an) re'or)e) /i!. i!. A chattel mortgage ma!, howe"er, +e "alid as +etween the parties without such an affida"it of good faith# In !! Corpus (uris) %*$, the rule is e3pressl! stated that as +etween the parties and as to third persons who ha"e no rights against the mortgagor, no affida"it of good faith is necessar!# It will thus +e seen that under the law, a 5ali) -or!,a,e -a+ e0is! 1e!/een !.e *ar!ies /i!.ou! i!s 1ein, e5i)en'e) 1+ a *u1li' )o'u-en!.