Vol. 26
The Cuyuni-Mazaruni Region must not become a Cinderella province
The Cuyuni-Mazaruni Region has become a zone of gross governmental neglect. The Regions mining and logging resources have been exploited for over a century and continue to enrich the national treasury. Its physical infrastructure, however, remains undeveloped. Its small, scattered population is exposed to criminal violence. Its lush environment is under threat of degradation. The economic potential, precarious security and political importance of the Region demand that a comprehensive development plan be designed to develop the material resources and improve the quality of life for residents. Environment: Reckless mining practices have created a health hazard. Studies funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) through the Guyana Environmental Capacity Development Project (GENCAPD) showed that 89 to 96 per cent of the population surveyed in one village Isseneru had almost double the reference level for humans of mercury contamination as recently as October 2013. High waters in the rivers and other waterways occasionally lead to flooding in parts of the Region. Owing to the floods, cassava and other staples rot in the ground and create food crises. Employment: Opportunities for the large number of school-leavers are few. The presence of Brazilian and other foreign mining companies has hardly provided relief. Qualified young people, in the absence of new investments, seek low-level jobs in the mining and logging industries or migrate to neighbouring Venezuela or other regions in search of work. Cost-of-living: Household expenses in the Upper Mazaruni are at their highest level ever. The cost of buying manufactures goods from the coastland is prohibitive. Gasoline sells for $2,800 - $3.000 per gallon at Kamarang making riverine transport and the cost of taking farm produce to market expensive. The cost of the one-hour aircraft flight from Ogle to Kamarang is about $28,000, inflating the cost of commodities.
Indigenous issues: The Regions toshaos have resisted the PPPC administration on a wide range of local issues. Toshaos mainly from the Upper Mazaruni collectively expressed great displeasure over the conduct of proceedings at the Government -controlled National Toshaos Council Conference last year. They said that the way that the conference was managed undermined their right to freely speak on issues affecting their communities. Physical infrastructure: The vital 180 km-long Bartica-Potaro trail which was built over a hundred years ago to connect Bartica in the Cuyuni-Mazaruni Region to Mahdia in the Potaro-Siparuni Region is in dire need of reconstruction. The Parika-Bartica river-boat service cannot cope with the current needs of the two populous riverine townships. There are many airstrips but they require regular maintenance. Public services: There are only three secondary schools in the entire Region. The Waramadong Secondary School is overcrowded and the staff is insufficient for the estimated 600 students. Attainment has been adversely affected by the large number of dropouts from the primary and secondary schools and of failures at the National Grade Six Assessment examinations. The main hospital the Bartica Regional Hospital is underequipped and understaffed. A river ambulance is needed to service the riverine areas. Hospitals further inland occasionally run out of drugs to treat prevalent complaints. Public security: The frequency of fatal aircraft accidents and boat collisions is disturbing. The prevalence of trafficking in persons and the incidence of armed robberies and everyday banditry are notorious. The Guyana Police Forces sub-divisional headquarters at Bartica, however, is ill-equipped to respond promptly to violent crimes, especially in the Regions gold- and diamond-mining districts. The Cuyuni-Mazaruni Region should not be allowed to degenerate into a Cinderella province. A Partnership for National Unity calls for the promulgation of a plan to meet the social, economic and political needs of this important part of Guyanas territory. There should be established, now, a new development authority to harness the Regions economic potential, encourage investment and, most of all, to protect the people from environmental hazard and criminal violence.
Minister resigns
JANUARY 24, 2014 | BY KNEWS | FILED UNDER NEWS
In a surprise development yesterday, Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, Ganga Persaud, announced his resignation from the position, effective January 31st. The announcement came as the National Assembly sat for the second time for the year. Persaud, as a Member of Parliament, was not present in the National Assembly. Several of the Parliamentarians, especially on the Governments side, were seemingly caught off-guard.
A statement from the Minister said his resignation was because of personal reasons. My resignation as Minister of Local Government and Regional Development is based on personal issues presently engaging my attention as well as some additional responsibilities to which I am committed. There was speculation that Persauds resignation is timed to coincide with preparations for Local Government Elections where he is expected to play a key coordination role. Persaud was a surprise pick by President Donald Ramotar to his Cabinet, following the November 2011 General and Regional Elections. He did not indicate whether he will be stepping down as a Member of Parliament but made it clear that he will continue to back the ruling Peoples Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C). Chief Whip of the PPP/C, Gail Teixeira, said the resignation was a personal one by Persaud. He is still a Member of Parliament, she said. Opposition Leader, David Granger, had no clue, but said that Minister Persaud, as the point person for local government organs, had done a lot of damage, installing a number of Interim Management Committees (IMCs) throughout the country. Granger was still hopeful that Local Government Elections, last held in the 90s, can still be hosted by mid-year. It was a distinct pleasure for me to have served as a Member of the Cabinet. I am extremely grateful to His Excellency, Mr. Donald Ramotar, for the confidence he placed in me and I wish to declare my fullest support to him and his Government. I pledge to do all that I can to support the PPP/C Government in everything that it is doing to bring greater, happiness and comfort to all of us as Guyanese, Minister Persaud said in his statement. According to the statement, Persaud has full confidence in President Ramotars ability to lead Guyana to greater heights and bring more opportunities for success to all Guyana. His Excellencys leadership styles are admired by many and I am always amazed at the ease with which he deals with issues, particularly delicate and sensitive issues. Ganga stressed that as Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, there were significant achievements during his tenure. These include strengthening of the Local Government Department, centrally and regionally; establishment of a Local Government Department to provide support to the NDCs and Municipalities; enhancement of relationships with communities across Guyana, through constant outreach programmes and visit to villages. There was also significant movement in the direction of informational technology that resulted in the improvement of the Ministrys communication network. I am extremely proud that together we, at most times, worked as a team to achieve all that have made us proud. I wish to thank my colleague Minister, the Hon. Norman Whittaker, PS Collin Croal, PA Chitra Singh, Confidential Secretary Geetanjali Curicca, Chauffeur Vedesh Lall and staff of my Ministry, as well as all in the RDCs, NDCs, Municipalities and CDCs for the support given to me and urged that they continue to work as a team for the good of all Guyanese.
Ganga, in the statement, insisted that as a member of the leadership of the PPP, he is committed to working with the party to enhance its chances at the next General and Regional Elections so as to reclaim the majority in the Parliament. This is so important for Guyanas continued growth and development since no other political party can assure our countrys development other than the PPP. Meanwhile, in a separate interview yesterday afternoon with Kaieteur News, the Minister expressed gratitude to media workers for the almost two and half years he was minister. He said that numerous factors would have led to his resignation including a number of future job opportunities and his desire to spend more time with his family. The Minister did not disclose what moves are next. He stated also that it is likely to be in service of Guyana in another field. The Minister has been in the hot seat, especially concerning the state of Georgetown and late last year, the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding to establish a US$30M recycling plant. Government abandoned the MoU after revelations that the company may not have had the experience or resources for such a project. The administration admitted that proper due diligence was not followed.
Opposition
By Kiana Wilburg A Partnership for National Unity (APNU)s Shadow Finance Minister, Carl Greenidge, says that the Minister of Finance, Dr. Ashni Singh should provide information to help account for the governance of agencies such as NICIL in the National Budget. Greenidge is also insisting that detailed accounting arrangements for funds provided to the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo) and Guyana Power and Light Inc. (GPL) should be treated in like fashion. Expressing similar sentiments was Vice Chairman of the Alliance For Change (AFC), Moses Nagamootoo. When it comes to NICIL there is an outstanding display of stubbornness to make full disclosure of the moneys that are not going into the consolidated funds. The company, which is headed by Winston Brassington, operates like a sub-treasury to which state assets are directed and it decides how resources from state assets should be spent, whereas these resources should be part of treasury. The Company literally contributes to the deformity of the financial system. It operates as a mini-elected government by itself and any entity that is the recipient of funding from taxpayers ought to be accountable to parliament, either by way of periodic reports or review by the economic and services committee.
Nagamootoo added, Any request to make them more accountable should not be spurned as unreasonable. The government must see the call for full disclosure to Parliament as an act of fiscal responsibility. Greenidge said that he had emailed the Minister of Finance on these requests, but he is yet to respond. The APNU parliamentarian also disclosed that he had submitted to the Minister a list of his issues relating to the 2013 budget, and the issues are by and large those that need to be addressed for the effective management and accountability of the expenditure and revenue of the country. While these issues were brought to the table when the 2013 budget was being examined, APNU is of the firm belief that the issues need to be addressed, since it extends to the budget process as a whole. In addition to this, Greenidge noted that APNU in its deliberations on the 2013 Budget had several concerns about a number of factors which form the background against which economic policies are to be cast. While he highlighted these issues, the Former Minister of Finance explained that this attempt to bring to the surface their concerns with the budget should not be misconstrued to mean that the faction is trying to prohibit the government from its right to fashion the budget. He insisted, however, that the budget must also serve as an instrument which promotes national development, and it is to that effect that the Opposition made its concerns with the budget process known. Greenidge stressed that several issues are not taken into account by the Minister of Finance when drafting the budget. For example, the widening income and wealth disparities within the society, the spiraling cost of living and the plight of the poor and vulnerable including the old, young unemployed females and males, especially those without adequate education and the need for better pay and conditions of work for the poor, as well as nurses, teachers and public servants across the country. In preparing the Budget, Greenidge suggested that the Government and its advisers should seek to address job creation, training, education and health facilities which can be accessed by the less fortunate. After reminding that the budget does not only examine the expenditure but also revenue, he then stressed the need for the completion of the tax reform process of which the Value Added Tax was an important element. He explained that in response to this concern about both the level of taxation and the unfair weight borne by some segments of the community, President Donald Ramotar established a Commission to examine the tax regime. The APNU Member of Parliament said that he is yet to see a report on the work of the said team and this needs to be included in the budget.
In addition to this, he said that it is also imperative that the country put in place arrangements to ensure that the resources of the state are appropriately and fairly managed as well as distributed. Greenidge then suggested that the first step in this direction would be to establish acceptable standards of financial administration and management at the national level. He noted too that there is a serious need for the discussions on the budget to also cover all measures affecting revenue, which include the disposal of state assets and criteria for such action. Moreover, given the importance of the capital programme in the overall budget, Greenidge asserted that it is imperative that there be arrangements for the careful consideration of the major elements of that programme. The criteria and rationale for the overall programme are missing. The key documents on which decisions are based have yet to be seen by any member of the Opposition, let alone by independent technical teams, Greenidge said in conclusion.
At the last sitting of the National Assembly, Dr Singh tabled belatedly, NICILs annual report for 2012. That report documented that of the $7B in revenue that it earned, only $1B was handed over to the Guyana Government. According to the 2012 report, NICILs assets in terms of property and equipment were just over $1.4B while it holds another $5B in investments. Having never collected any dividends from the Berbice Bridge Company Inc, the report disclosed that in 2012 NICIL sold all of its shares to the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) for $950M. By the end of 2012, the company had also invested almost $3B in Atlantic Hotel Inc, which is building the Marriott Hotel in Kingston. The report also documents that during the year 2012, NICIL also sold all of its shares in the Guyana Telephone and Telegraph Company for US$30M. As at the end of 2012, NICIL received US$25M for the sale with the remaining US$5M payable in two years. The report stated that other than Brassington, who has a contract for service with NICIL, there were no other contracts between the company and any of its Directors. The Directors for NICIL, at the end of 2012 were Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh, Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Roger Luncheon, Sonya Roopnauth, a Director in the Finance Ministrys Budget Office, Nigel Dharamlall who is also the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs and the Executive Director, Winston Brassington. In November Greenidge had lashed out at the Finance Minister for failing to comply with the resolution which came out of the motion on NICIL that the opposition had voted for. That motion in the House arose from general concerns about the unaccountability on the part of NICIL for a variety of actions; how it had taken decisions with Government resources in a number of projects and also because NICIL was originally established as a holding company which was intended to oversee the allocation of assets that came out of the privatization. It was also responsible for advising on how properties are disposed of but the government instead, uses NICIL to get these lands and distribute them to its friends without having to go through any proper procedure for vetting or for setting prices or anything like that, according to Greenidge. State lands are not supposed to be handed out at personal whims and fancies, which is what the government has been using the company to doThis is the heart of the problem. And so a motion was passed in 2012 calling on the Government to account for the lands that it has been entrusted with and to explain the basis upon which these lands have been handed out. It was also asked to ensure that the agency brings its accounts up to date and that they hand over the monies and excess funds to the treasury.
Solomon also said that residents of Linden plan to voice their displeasure on more than just their dissatisfaction about the agreement. Nurses from the Linden Hospital Complex plan to be present to reiterate their dissatisfaction with the 5% wage increase issued by government last year. Lindens nurses were among members of the public sector who took strike action after the government said it could not afford to give a larger increase. Despite such action though, it does not seem as though a larger increase is forthcoming. Workers who argue that they were wrongfully dismissed by the Bauxite Company of Guyana Inc. (BCGI) in November 2009 are also expected to be part of gathering which will welcome the president when he visits.
Human Rights body advocates for independent investigation of Police Brutality caseChallenges government to foot medical expenses
Kaieteur News, January 19, 2014 It is the opinion of the Guyana Human Rights Association (GHRA) that the Guyana Police Force (GPF) is engaged in a cover-up rather than an investigation of the brutality to Colwyn Harding. This, the body says it has concluded after an alleged eyewitness of the incident came forward and disclosed that he was asked by some police ranks not to give a statement. The body voiced that it is therefore calling for the appointment of a respected and independent person to investigate all aspects of the matter and for vigorous implementation of all the recommendations such an investigation might produce. Additionally, it is calling for sustained public vigilance over any subsequent proceedings while recommending that the Government assume all costs of medical treatment required for the full recuperation of the young man. The eyewitness, who identified himself as Stephan Joseph Phillips called Muslim, told Kaieteur News that he, along with his 17-year-old son, was detained at the Timehri Police Station from November 14 to 15, around the same time Harding was brought to the station.
According to the GHRA, the reports of the brutality dealt to the young man extend the perception of a supposedly disciplined services being out of control. It said that such efforts at cover -up undermine the credibility of the upper echelon of the Guyana Police Force. The body added that the polices efforts to defend themselves against charges of negligence and laxity in responding to the original allegations of the assault are not convincing. Police officers allegedly present when the beatings and sexual assault took place apparently took no responsibility to either stop the assault, to assist Harding to get prompt medical attention, nor to report the incident to higher authority, it said. Describing it as a belated scramble, the body pointed out that the investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) was only prompted by interventions from the press. In other words, extreme physical brutality, an offense which merits years in prison if committed by a civilian let alone the allegations of sexual assault was treated as a routine disciplinary incident when involving a police officer. The GHRA expressed that another reason for the failure to report could be the perception that such reports are unwelcome by superiors. It said that the state of things internally in the GPF, and in the event it is more widespread than it seems, suggest that the institution is beyond internal reform. Where the vitality and vision for renovation is to come from is unclear, but it seems safe to say that it will not be from within the GPF or the political party sphere, the body posited. It added that it deems calls for the resignation of the Commissioner of Police and the Minister of Home Affairs as understandable and identified that bodies such as the Police Service Commission and the Police Association, which should be channels for re-vitalizing the GPF, are moribund. The only guarantee of re-invigorating the GPF with standards of integrity and professionalism is greater direct public involvement in decision making at all levels of public life. The body made reference to an attempt, almost a decade ago, to renovate the GPF as an institution, noting that the opportunity was lost when the watered down recommendations produced by the Disciplined Services Commission were kicked into the long grass by Parliament. With respect to the SWAT team, the Human Rights body posited that here is not where priority should lie but at instilling respect throughout the Force for the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials and the Minimum Standards for the Treatment of Prisoners. It opined that Senior Police officials and politicians responsible for law and order should regularly and publicly promote and implement these standards. The total silence by senior authorities on these standards send a signal to lower ranks that use of excessive force is no big thing. As such it is calling for a process of renovating the leadership of the GPF in a manner which underlines and ring-fences professionalism from political party interference.
APNU, he said, laments the fact that the PPPC administration never fully implemented that plan. The PPPC administration has still not implemented the essential elements of the 21st August 2012 agreement between the Central Government and the Regional Administration seventeen months after signing it. It is upon this background that the leader of APNU made a call for a new plan which he believes is now needed to resume the task of the development of the Upper DemeraraBerbice Region. This call was also supported by Morian, who also later elaborated on the points raised by the Leader of the Opposition.
APNU says its being sidelined from Budget consultationWill force implementation of reforms if concerns not taken on board
Kazieteur News, January 18, 2014 The opposition coalition A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) says that it remains hopeful that consultation with government over the 2014 budget would be reached. However hope is rapidly draining away taking into consideration that it will be presented in March and budget arrangements and submissions by the respective Ministries would have been done already while no substantial talks between the opposition and government have commenced. APNU said that its position was that a tripartite Budget Commission be established because of the importance of the budget, however it didnt happen in 2011 when it was first advanced, in 2012, or in 2013 even though President Donald Ramotar promised to initiate a new process on the first of July last year. Leader of APNU David Granger expressed that real face to face consultation has not taken place there has been some engagement but the concerns of APNU have not been taken on board by the Minister of Finance Dr. Ashni Singh up to the present time so we cannot expect that in the remaining two months we would be able to cover sufficient ground. The budget is a very complicated document with three huge volumes like an encyclopedia and it calls for a lot of data, people cannot simple produce a shopping list and expect that shopping list to be accepted. We have to be given the information on which to base our plans. The government has all that information, it has all the technicians and I would say we have been sidelined from the process up to the present time. Granger added that the government is playing a very dangerous game in denying them the opportunity to contribute meaningfully through the consultative process and feels that the budget which is in its advanced stages of preparation has not incorporated the main concerns of APNU. According to Granger, while he recognizes the responsibility of the executives for the final preparation of the budget, there is now a different dispensation in the National Assembly and as such they have called for a consultative process so that the majority can have its concerns addressed in the budget. The opposition leader said that they will continue to exercise their action to reduce funding in areas where they feel there is no transparency or the money is not being used for a proper purpose. In the case of the National Communication Network for example we cut the funding because we feel that the opposition parties do not have adequate coverage, or do not have access with the State media, the Chronicle, NCN, or GINA and many of the positions taken by the opposition is not covered so we cut that.
According to Granger, APNU didnt cut for the sake of cutting, but cuts were made to insure that reforms are put in place as was the case with the Guyana Sugar Corporation, and Guyana Power and Light (GPL) . So we dont go to the National Assembly to cut, we go to the National Assembly to force the government to implement reforms and that is what is going to happen unless the government calls us in, consults with us and take our concerns on board.
It has to do with the will of the PPP-C and their will is reflected in the instructions given to the key administrators, all of whom they alone appoint, to release persons and equipment seized in the course of carrying out activities/ investigations closely associated with or actually involving money laundering. The Member of Parliament added, Those powers to oversee the administrative or executing agencies (The Guyana Police Force; Customs, The Bank of Guyana, FIU, The Guyana Revenue Authority etc.) and to appoint all their key personnel, should be overseen by civil society and not the PPPC alone. APNU feels strongly that if this is not done nothing will change, and money launderers will continue to operate throughout Guyana without fear of ever being prosecuted. The tendency of the Executive arm of Government, Cabinet members in particular, to behave lawlessly without fear of reprimand and legal consequences, and the dangers it poses to our fundamental rights are attributable to the refusal of the PPP-C and the Executive to put in place the fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution Independence of the Judiciary; Ombudsman; Appellate Tribunals, Public Procurement Commission; Constitutional offices etc. These problems will be compounded by strengthening the powers of the Government under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Act. He noted too that in the face of the failure of President Donald Ramotar to assent to Bills properly passed by the National Assembly to limit or remedy the above, APNU will not pass any legislation laid by the Executive. A strong, enforceable Bill should be accompanied by measures to meet our demands for better governance, particularly as it regards fulfillment of outstanding constitutional requirements, including the establishment of the Public Procurement Commission. The two must go hand in hand.
$1.5B spent in two monthsReturning voted down expenditure does not guarantee approval- Granger
Kaieteur News, January 21, 2014 Simply returning Financial Papers with expenditure that previously did not gain the support of A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) does not guarantee approval. This is the position held by Leader of the Political Opposition, Brigadier (retd) David Granger, who said that while the coalition is still to take a definitive position, some of the expenditure returned had been previously voted down as a matter of principle. He said that the coalitions Shadow Cabinet will meet today and take a decision on how it will be voting on Thursday.
Granger did point out that key to the decision-making process would be if the Finance Minister has provided the requisite explanatory information accompanying the expenditure amounts. Granger reminded of a previous occasion where Speaker of the National Assembly, Raphael Trotman, had pointed out to Finance Minister, Dr Ashni Singh, that he would not be allowing debates on Financial Papers, if they do not meet the requirements of the Fiscal Management and Accountability Act, as it relates to providing the required information. Under the Substantive Law, after drawing down from the Contingencies Fund, The Minister shall report at the next sitting of the National Assembly on all advances made out of the Contingencies Fund since the previous report of the Minister, which report shall specify (a) the amounts advanced; (b) to whom the amounts were paid; and (c) the purpose of the advances. Granger pointed out too that another main consideration that the coalition will be addressing is whether the moneys that had been drawn down by the Finance Minister from the Contingencies Fund, meet the criteria. Under the law, The Minister, when satisfied that an urgent, unavoidable and unforeseen need for expenditure has arisen (a) for which no moneys have been appropriated or for which the sum appropriated is insufficient; (b) for which moneys cannot be reallocated as provided for under this Act; or (c) which cannot be deferred without injury to the public interest, may approve a Contingencies Fund advance as an expenditure out of the Consolidated Fund by the issuance of a drawing right. The last time the National Assembly met, Finance Minister, Dr Ashni Singh, tabled two Financial Papers representing expenditure he would have approved in the final two months of 2013 amounting to just about $1.5B. The scrutiny and vote on the amounts is scheduled on the Order Paper for Thursdays sitting.
According to the details of one of the Supplementary requests to the 2013 Budget, between November 6, last year and December 31, $121.9M was transferred to the Ministry of Public Works and the expenditure was incurred in relation to providing additional support to Transport and Harbours Department. The Ministry of Home Affairs was also a beneficiary of moneys allocated over the two-month period. The Financial Paper details that $69M was used in relation to increased travelling by ranks to conduct investigations, especially in interior locations. The Ministry was initially given $616.5M for local travel and subsistence. The Guyana Defence Force (GDF) was also the recipient of $100M.
According to the Financial Paper, the expenditure was incurred in relation to Joint Services Operations. The money was provided under the line item, dietary for which it had already received more than $747M. The GDF also received $50M under the line item for equipment maintenance and according to the description provided, Expenditure incurred in relation to Joint Services Operations. It had initially been allocated $320M for the forces equipment maintenance. The GDF spent an additional $51M, moneys which it received under the line item, Other Transport, Travel and Postage. The explanation for this expenditure was said to be in relation to Joint Services Operations. It received a further $36M for its Vehicle Spares and Services. The Ministry of Agricultures Crops and Livestock Support Services also received under its Agriculture Export Diversification Project, $257.5M. The Ministrys explanation of how the money was spent is, Provision for additional inflows specific to drainage and irrigation works including control structures, gates, culverts, bridges, pump station and rehabilitation of channels and consultancy services. The Ministry of Housing and Water under its Low Income Settlement Programme, received an additional $97.6M. Provision for additional inflows specific to upgrading of roads, construction of core homes and supply of materials and labour for the construction of houses under the hinterland pilot component was its explanation.
Visit our website for more informationwww.apnuguyana.com or follow us on facebook-APNU GUYANA and twitter-APNUGuyana