"'...,-0"'-. 'O)'''''"'oo<:'Oq:2
Coolent of Code ;:; 5 ;; '-J v S LI v ommenh
irthptoce of members
Pre$ent resiclence
Occupottonol
compo$ition
Polltlcal
attocnmenh
[
mmod'O"
background
Code in uni"
of 2
Legallty of ht Act
Preeipitating
factar
Type of violence
Respome to violence
other forms of
portidpation
Concerted Action
MutlJOl Ald
Overt Imitation
[
Obi'C"V"
Code in
unlts of
!wo
Explicitness of
abiectives
Unity of abjectives
40
4
(. I>
(4 0
(4 "
(4
5
G
5
61
I> 1)
;..
'"
2-
0
"
"
I
(; I>
0
"
,
2-
"
2-
7
,
I
(: I
(: 1-
(6 C> o
(: < "
(
711- ,
71 "
Homogoneity cf (7 z 2. '2..
objectives 7 0 0 0
Autonomy cf objectiva 7 2. Z.
Fluctuotian in focus 7 3 1
Territory controlled (7 0"
74- I 2.
Fluctuation in
torritory controUed
7 I
7 J 0 0
B<
Materials {rom the Study 0/ Collective Violence in France 263
848 02 29 01
La rousse
21/12. communes. The three not llsted are Bertren (!I-P). TrO!)b8.t (H-P) , and
Bagiry (I-!-G). The communal information for thern is the same as for those communes
1isted on the cards.
21 to 29/27. No po1itica1 tendency or apathy nOte<!. C1arene states that this dis-
turbance had nothing to do w1th po1itics.
21 to 29/39. Change in regime created uncertainty as to whether former officials
still lega11y in office. Insurgents claimed that they were nOt and treated them as such.
This uncertainty rnay also exp1ain why repressive action not taken until 3
31 to 29/39. Rcsentrnent against Code Forestier and enforcement of 1t. Resentment against
state and certain proprietaires who were feIt to be usurpateurs de droits legitimes.
21 to 29/42. Resentment against usurers.
21 tO 29/45. Actions by national government which delivered into hands of certain pro-
prietaires land whieh WlS feIt to be cOll1lllon.
21 to 29/48. Numerous proees-verbaux etc. against vioLutors of Code Forestier.
32/37. Numerous incidents of brigandage and destruction occurred in various communes.
I have grouped a11 victims together. These include public officia1s (conducteur du
Diligence, maires, Receveur de l'Enregistrement etc.) proprietaires and usurers.
33/37. Garde nationaux, militaires, gendarmes, and some priests.
32/43. Administ.ration, emp10yes des contribution, etc.
33/43. Police, militaires, national guard, and priests.
31/52. Net,rs of change in regime gives brigands apretext for revolt and an unsett1ed
situation to take advantage of.
31/56. For the first three days, the rebels responded to no violence. On 3 Narch,
they met the repressive formation in battle, both sides using firearms.
31/62. Code Forestier.
31/64. Condiolls of usury.
31/66. Destruetion of private property in revenge.
41/43. Estimates are 15-1800, and 2000.
t,2/t,3, Different individuals throughout area, a rough estimate.
43/43. About 50 $oldiers aod gendarmes (Clarenc). The rest was national guard of five
towns of over 11,000 inhabitants total .. National guard strength inferred from nature
of action and sizes of tOI,rns.
41/55. Formation generally expanding. '" 1 x 200 + 1 x 800 + 2 x 1800 '" 4600.
42/55. Each participant in this formation was inv01ved during only one day.
42/67. C1arenc mentions no wounded <Ind states that none were ki11ed. Newspapers vary
horn one to seven wounded and one to ehree killed.
41/72. Some estimates are 10\,;er (97 and 81), but 98 is often repeated, and used by
Clarenc. Ten t,rere prosecuted and faund guilty.
51-52/13. The sequence presented between the two XX codes is not a true sequence but
a recreation of a typical incident. Ten to incidents of a similar nature took
p1ace between 29 February and 3 March, and there is no room to code thern sequntia11y.
After the second XX, the battle of 3 is coded as usua1.
51/17. Invasion of mairie, bureau de llenregistremellt or bureau of the forestier.
Subsequent burning of records and mistreating of officia1s.
52/31. A different victim: a chateau otmer.
51-53/t,3. 3 March, noon, at Antichan. Rounding up of prisoners continues until 5:00 p.m.
264 Appendix 2
848 02 29 01 La Barousse (cont. , p. 2)
65/14. Change in regime.
65/44. Formation 53 is 1aw enforcement force. tlowever, division between 51 and 52 com-
bines differences of occupation (lnd property.
66/51. A great number of public records burned in almost every tO\1fl, mostly
to Code Forestier lists of offenses, fines and proces-verbaux. Records of debts also
bur.i.ed. Hinor damage to public buildings. A huissier's \vas
aud horse stolen in Nauleen-Barousse. A pig, some pork, and some was taken 1-n
Sost arms and insignia of administrateur forestier stolen, Pillage 1-n Loures-Barousse,
invaded (Ind pillaged in Antichan. six men ransommed in Trobat and Bertren, ,
and provisions stolen in Aula. Plag torn in Izaourt. Largest damage ,at a s
chateau in Luscan (vhere trees were cut, gril.les broken, doors broken ln, furn1-tur
broken or stolen and linen and books destroyed or taken.
66/55. This is a 10\0,1 estimate. 30,000 fraucs damage alone at cbateau de Luscan.
66/73.
tably a
Signac,
70/18.
I\lthough completely stifled, this disturbance stimulated
plot to assassinate Receveur de l'eenregistrement, the 17 Apr:d
und the incident at ize-Nisto$ at thc end of April.
NC 1848-03-10 (582-583)
.!d 1848-03-11
71-78. Comments
incidents, no-
disturbance at
Very diJ.cult to code because of the great number of small incident$. See
the model sequence code devJ.sed to handle this and note that there are twe1ve communes
involved.
79. Biblionraphy
79 ... 01 Clarenc, Troubles de Barousse. du 195J,
79 ... 02 Cayne, in Godechot, !1!. s!.: .1848 .e.
329-3/.8.
153-15Lf.
1 Materials {rom the Study o{ Collective Violence in France 265
LL
LL
LL
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIlIIrI
II
SSSSSSSS5S
S5SSS5SSS5SS
SS SS
55
TTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTT
TT
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LLLLLLLlLLLL
LLLLLLlLLLLL
1I
11
Il
II
I I
II
II
II II 11 II II
IIIIIIIIII
555
SSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSS5
555
55
S5 55
S5SS5SSSSSSS
SSS555SSSS
218_8022901 65115221 001224000810510\006207}000IS0ST
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
22848022901 65080428 BAPOUS5E
23848022901 65010638
24848022901 650]0418 00122400081051010062071000!ANlA
25848022901 31076213 0012240008IOS10I00620710001L'JSCAN
26848022901 65111028 001224000810510100620710001SARP
27848022901 31016037 00122400081051010U620710001SAPBAZON
28848022901 65066209
29848022901 65075413 001224000810510100620710001l0URES SAROUSSE
31848022901BPIGANDS 531201010001007330314211132402021412023S46l
32848022901vlCTIMEs OE BRIGANDAGE 9112020200010012602110111818385105020210110
33848022901REPRE5S!VE FORCES 9012010201030014407710111837400013120610230
41B480229011143121208ANDE CDNSIOERABlE 01B00204774304600Q520000000S30098\11e
42848022901000000010NO KEY 00030901724300030n1400000005600000011
43848022901446113120DEUX COLONNES
51848022901 11833582814035648385828164 264545535199
52$48022901 02513551575151575151530202 020202020202
53848022901
60848022901 000305050606050511050505050511030405071213
21535JACOUEQIE 'RAVES OES0RQRES
6684802290100026303057743000543006200000001030098190 34311254ZOl5012347171111t
7084802290140100313001399660719660817755028 VEPv OIFFrCUlT TO :OOE
7184802290!BECAUSE OF GKEAT OF SMALL INCIOENTS. SEE THE .MOOEL
7284802290jSEQUENCE CODE OEvISEO TO THIs AND NOTE TKAT THERE ARE 12
73848022901COMMUNEs INVO,-VED
7984802290101CLARENC. TROUBLES OE 8AROUSSE, ANNAlES DU' MIDI. 1951 329-345
7984802290102CAYNE. IN GOOECHOT. LA OE 1848 A TOUlOUSE. 153-154
80848022901012112112 COMMUNES. TKE TH"EE NOT LISTEO 8EQTREN %,,_.?<.
808480229010221122ANO SAIGRY %H-G<. THE COM"!uNAI_ INFOPMATION FOR THE"! 15 THE
AS FOR TI-lOSE C04MUNES LISTEO ON C!'<Ds
808480229010421271NO POLITlCAl TENOENCy 0'< APATHY 'iOTEO. Cl..AqEl-fC 'iiLHES THAT
!108.. 80229010S21272THIS DISTU;fBANCE HAO NOTHIN" TO 00 .iITI1 POLITICS.
B084802290t0622271NO POLITICAl TENOENCY APATI-lY NOTED. C'.6.RE,>.JC STATES THAT
808480229010722272TH1S OISTU:<:8A"ICE HAD NOTHING TO 00 wITH
8084802290!0823271NO POLITICAL TENOE"ICY 0;:( APATHY NOTEO. CUI-IE:"<C STATES THAT
608480229010923272THIS HAO NOTH!NG TO 00 POLITIC5.
308480229011024271NO POLITIC..'!.L TENDE'KY 0" APAT"y :-.jOTEO. STATE5 y,.,AT
8084802290111242721HI5 H6,O NOTHING 10 00 POLITICS.
808480229011225271NO POlIT!CAL TENOENCY APAT... y NOTEO. C'.'<ENC SP.TES
808480229011325272THIS HAO NOTHING TO 00 wITH POLITIC$.
808480229011426271NO POlITICAL TENOENCY 0" NOTEO. CLAr.ENC STATES T"4T
808480229011526272THIS HAD NOTHING TO 00 POlITICS.
POl!TICAL TENOENCY OR STATES
808480229011727272THIS HAD NOTHING TO 00 ,... IPi PO!.lTICS.
80848022901182827!NO POL!TICAl TENDENCY NOTEO. STATES
HAD NOTH!NG TO 00 POl..IT[CS.
ece .. 80229012029271NO POLITICAl TENOEI-1CY O=< APATI-'Y NOTEO. STATES
B08 .. 80229Dl2129272TH!S HAD NOTHING TQ 00 WITH POtITICS.
aC&4/j0229012221391CHANGE IN PEGl"E CREATEO IJ'KERL\INTY AS TO Io/HETHER FORMER
STILL LEGALLY lN OFFICE. INSUR6ENTS CLAIMEO
266 Appendix 2
THEY NOT ANO TQEATED THE SUCH. THIS
MAY ALSO ACTION W4S NOT
802290'262139STAKEN UNTIL 3
8084802290i2722"-91CH4NGE IN REGIME OIEATEO uNCERTAINTY A$ TO ,:tlETf<Eq FOR"ER
80a:a02290128223920FF ICI AlS STILL lEGAlLY IN OFFICE. !NSUQGENTS CUIMED
608480229012922393THAT THEY NOT ANO TREATEO AS SUCH. TH!S
MA: ALSO EXPLAlN WHY REPRESSIVE ACTION wAS NOT
eoe4e0229013122395TAKEN UNTIL MARCH 3
80R .. IN REGIME UNCEPHINTY 4S TO 1"0-
liiERE STILL ll'..G!lLLY OFFICE. l>.JSU.-GE,HS CUI ._1)
808480229013423393THAT THEY wERE NOT ANO TOEATEO THE'1 AS SUCI-i. Tins
80R480229013523394UNCf RTAINTY MAY Al SO EXPLAIN WHY REPRESSIvE ACTI0I\1 WA<; NOT
808480229013623395TAKEN UNTIL MARCH 3 ...
80fl.480229013724"'QlCHANGE IN REGIME CREATEr) UNCEflTAINTY AS Ta "iHETHER FOR ER
8084802290138243920FfICIALS WERE STILL IN OFFICE. TNSlIPGENTS CL'IIMEO
e08480229013924393THAT T"lEY WERE NOT ANO TQEATED THEI' AS SUCI-!. THlS
8084802290140?4394UNC[RTldNTY "'AY AL'lO EXpt41N '11"'( REPRESSIVE wAS NOT
80B480229014124395TAKEN UNTll MARCH 3
808480229014225391CHANGf IN REGI"lE CREATEn UNCERTAINTY A5 TO Io/HETHER fORt'ER
808480Z290143253920F'FICI4LS '4EflE STILL LEGALLY IN OFfICE. INSUPGENTS Cll\IMEO
e08480229014425393THH THEY 'fiERE NOT ANO TI-IEATEO THEI' AS SUCH. THIs
80fl,480229014525394UNCERTAINTY ALSO W"lY REPRESSIVE WAS NOT
808480229014625395TAt<EN UNTlL MIl,RCH 3 ."
80A480229014726391CHANGE IN REGI-'>\E CREATEO UNCERTAINTY A" TO fORHER
8084802290 148263920ffIC I ALS I_EHE STILL LEGf>.LL Y I N OfF I CE. INSU>:GfNTS CLA I MI: 4
1l08480229014926393THAT THEY WEHE NOT ANO T4EATEO THEM AS SIlCH. THIS
80S480229015026394UNCr. IHAINTY "'AY ALSO. fXPLAIN W4Y REPRESSIVE ACTION WAS NOT
UNTIL MAQCH 3
B08480229015227391CHANGE IN REf.I"IE CREATE!) UNCERTJ\.INTy TO wHETHER
BOfl48022901S3273920FF ICIAL5 "ERE STILL lEGALLY IN OffICE. INSUPGENTS
1l084B022901<;427393THAT THO wEHF.: NOT ANO THE" AS SUCH. THJ5
e08480229015527394UNCEHTAINTV .ALSO [XPLAIN WHY REPRES5IVF ACTION WA'l NOT
LNT IL MARCH 3 ,,' 1 ..
80848022901572B391 CH l\NGE IN CREATE!) A' TO "iHETHER fOR ER
S08480229015A2S3920FF IClhLS STILL IN OFfICE. INSUpr,ENTS CLAIMEO
B08480?2901592S393THAT THEY ,.ERE NOT ANO T!->EATED THE" AS SUCH. THIS
80A480229016028394UNC(RTAINTY MAY ALSO EXPLAIN w.ry REPRESSIVE WAS NOT
B08480229016128395TAKEI\I UNTIL MARCH 3
80fl480229016229391CHANGF. IN CREATEn UNCERTAINTY 1\<; TO o,JHETHER FORMER
808480?290163293920FFICIIILS STILL LEGlILlY IN OFfICE. tNSUPGENTS CI_AlMEn
80B480229016429393THAT THEY WERE NOT ANO TOEATED AS THIS
80840229016S29394UNCERTAINTY MAY ALSO F.XPLAIN \tI)-1Y REPRESSIVE ACTION 'tiA'l NOT
808480229016629395TAKEN UNTIL MARCH 3
AGAINST CODE FORESTIER ANO ENFORCE,'tENT OF IT .
AGAINST STATE ANO CERTAIN PROPRIETII.IREs '11"10 wEflE
8084S0?2901n921393FElT TO BE USURPATEURS OE OROITS lEGITIMES
80S4S0229017022391f?ESENTMENT AGAIN<;T CODE FORESrtER "NO ENfORCE,'ENT nF IT.
80B480229017122392RESENT"ENT MAINST STATE AND CERTAIN PROPRIETflIRES WHO WERE
S084 fl 0229017222393FELT TO BE USURPtlTEURS OE OROPS LEGITIME<;
808480229017323391 1lESENPIENT "GI'IINST CODE fORESTIEf-l "NO ENFOPCE',IENT OF IT"
8084S0229017423392RESENTI'ENT AGArNST STATE ANO CERTAIN \tI'10 WSRS
BOf\4S02290t7523393fELT TO BE USURPATEURS OE {)fH.'ITS LE<;;ITIHES
AGAINST CODE FORESTIER ENfORCE',:ENT Of IT.
A<";AINST STATE ANO CERTAIN PROPRIET/lIRES WHO WERE
80B4802290178?4393FELT TI) BE USURPATEURS OE QROPS LEGITIME:;
BO4802290179?5391 RESENTMENT "GA[NST COOE fORESTIER I'INtl ENFOpcE',ENT OF IT.
SO4802290180?5392RESENWENT AGAINST STIITE A"iD CERrAIN PROPRIETAIRE:. WHO WERE
S084802290 18125393FEL T TO SE USURPHEURS f1E OPOITS I Ee-IT IMES
BOS480?Z9018226391RESENTt.'ENT AGA[NST C00E fORESTIEI':I AN!) ENFORCEI'ENT OF IT.
80S48022901S3Z6392f-lESENP,lENT AGAINST STATE AloIO CEPUIN PROPRIETAIRE5 WHO \tiERE
B084B0229018426393FElT TO BE USURP"TEURS nE DROIT5 lE"ITIMES
AGAINST CODE AND OF IT.
BO!l4S0Z<?<10 1 8627392RE SENTI"ENT AGA I NS T ST AT( AND CERT A 1 N PROPP t EI A IRES \tIHO wEf-lE
80B .. 80229018727393FEl T TO RE USURPATEURS OE DRO!TS l.EGITIME<;
8084S0?290113828391 PE<;ENT'.\ENT IIGAINST CODE FORESTIEfl 6NO f.NFORCEt'ENT OF IT.
a08480?2901892S39 2R(<;ENT'\ENT Ar:ArNST STATE ANO CERTAHI PROPRIEHIRE<; WHO wEP(
tlO480229019028393FEI_T TI} BE IIE tHHHTS LEGITIMES
Materials from the Study of Collective Violence in France 267
8084B022901912939lf1ESENT','ENT flGAtNST CODE FOI-?ESTTER "NO ENFM!CEt.lENT OF TT.
8084f!0229019229392nESENT'-'ENT AGAINST STATE AND CEnTAI ... PROPRTEHIPES 10140 ;vEf'f
SOA4S022901Q329393fELT T0 RE USURPATEURS tEGITIME:,
S084S0229019421421RESENTMENT AGAINST USURPrRS
S08480229019522421RESENTMENT AGAINST USUR 'ERS
808480229019623421RESEI\ITMENT i\GA INS T USUR')ERS
8084802290 19724421 i\GA II\1ST USUR"ERS
8084802290 19825421 AGA INST USURofRS
S08480229(l19926421RESEN!'-IENT AGA INST USURofRS
AI1AINST USURPFRS
a08480?Z901992842lRESENTI.'ENT AGAINST USUR?ERS
B013480229019929421RESENTHENT AGAINST USUR'FRS
SOS480229019921451ACT!ON<; ey NATIONAL GOVT WH!CH OELIVEqED INTO HAND<; OF
80B4B0229019921452PROPRIETAIRES LANO WHICH WAS FELT TO BE COMMON
S084S0229019922451ACTIONS SY NATIONAL GOVT WHICH OELlvE.!?EO INTO fH.NOS OF
808480229019922452PROPRIETAIRES LAND wHIC4 WAS FELT TO BE GOMMO".
S084B022'J019923451ACTION<; BY NATIONAL ';oVT WHICH OELIvEllEO INTO HANOS OF
80S4802?,9019923452PROPRrETAIRES LAND wKICrl WAS FELT TO Sf. COHMON
8084S0?29019924451ACTION<; BY NATIONAL GOVT WHICH OElIVE!?EO INTO OF
6084S0229019924452PROPRIETAIRES LANO wHICH WAS FElT TO BE COMMON
aOS48022901992545!ACTIONS BY NATIONAL GOVT WHICH DElIVEREO INTD OF
80480229019925452PROPRIETAIRES LAND WHICH TO RE COMMON
80fl.48022901992M5},dCTION<; SY NATIONAL WHICH OELlvEREO INTO HAND'.' OF
80B480229019926452PROPRIETAIRES LAND WHICH WAS FELT TO BE
BY r,OVT WHICH INTO HANO<; Of
S08480229019927452PROPRIETAIRES LANO \tIHICH WAS fELT TO BE COMMON
8048022901992A451ACT10N<; ey NATIONAL GOVT WHICH DELIvEllED INTO HAND':> OF
80S480229019928452PRPRIETAIRES WHiCH WAS FELT TO BE COMMON
BY NATiONAL WHICH INTO HAND<; OF
808480229019929452PROPRIETAIRES LAND wHICH wAS fELT TO BE
PROCES-VERBAUX ETC AGAINST VIOLATORS OF CODE
808480229019921482fORESTIfR
PROCES-VERBAUX ETC AGAINST vrOLATORS Of CODE
a08480?,290199224S2FORESTTER
PROCES-VERBAUX ETC A',AINST VIOLATORS Of CODE
80B4802290199234A2FORESTIER
PROCES-VERBAUX ETC AGAINST VIOLATORS OF CODE
808480229019924482FORESTTER
PROCES-vERBAUX ETC AGAtNST VIOLATOPS OF CODE
SOB480229019925482FORESTIER
80fl.48022901992M81NUMEROUS PROCES-vERBAUX ETC A1.AINST vrOLATORS OF CODE
808480?290!9926482fORESTIER
;>ROCES-VERBAUX ETC AGAINST V!OLATOR5 OF CODE
80A4S0229019927482FORESTTER
a084802?90199284S1NUt1E'Wl'S PROCES-VERBAUX ETC AGATNST VIOLATORS OF CODE
S084802290 1992,S4 82fUHE >T 1 ER
S084S02290199294!:\!NU>.1EROUS PROCES-VERBAUX ETC AI;AINST VIOtATORS OF CODE
808480229019929482FORESTTER
lNCIOENTS OF ernGANOAGE ANO OESTRUCTION OCCURREO IN
B084802290191232372VAHIOUS I HI\VE GROUPED ALL VICTIM<; TOGETHEP.
B08480229019932373THESE PUBLIC OfflCIAl<; 't;CONOUCTEUQ DU OIl,rGENCE.
SOB480229019912374/.iAIRIES. RECEvEuR OE l\'jENREGISTREMENT ETC< PROPRIETI'IIRES
808480229019932375AND USURERS
B08480229019933371GAROE NATI0NAUX. MILITAIRES. SOME PRIESTS
8084B0229019932431AOMINISTRATJOI\I, EMPLOyES OES CONTRIBUTION. PRooRIT1IRES ETC
8084S0229019933431POLICE. MIUTAIREo::. NATIONAL G>lARO. ANf) PRIESTS
a084B0229019931521NE .... S OF CHANGE IN GlvES BRIGANO" APRETExT FOR REVO!. T
8084a0229019931S2?ANO AN UNSETTlEO SITUATTON TO TA!<E AOVANTAGE OF
808480229019931S61FOR T4E FIRST "3 PAYS. T,jE REBELS RESPONOEO TO NO VIOLE1>4Cf_.
SO4a02290199315620N MWCH 3 THF.Y MET THE REPRESSIvE FORt--IATlON 8ATTLf..
8084S02290 19931563S I :)ES US ING F 1 REAR'I<;
S084S02290 199 31621 CODE FOflES TIER
aO'\480229019Q31641CO",OITIONS I)F
808480229019931661DESTRUCT10N OF PRIVATE PROPEPTY IN REVENGE
AnE 1500-1aOo. ANO 2000
8084S02290199424310IFFE"ENT INOIV!OUALS THROUGHOUT A:<EA. A ROUGH E<;TIMATE
80848022901.9943431ASOUT 50 SOLOIERS ANO GENDARMES "-,CLARENC<. Tf1E '"lAS
268 Appendix 2
SOS4S0229019943432NATtONAL GUARD Of 5 TOwN5 OF OVER 11000 INKA8ITANTS TOTAL.
808480229019943433NATIONAl GUARO STRENGTH INFERREO NA TUnE OF ACTION ANO
S084S0229019943434SIZE5 OF TOwNS
eOS480229019941SS1FOR"'ATI0N GENERALLY EXPANOING. "'ANDAYS Ii lx200 & !XPOO I;.
8084802290199415522x1800 # 4600
aOS480229019942SS1EACH PARTICIPANT IN FORMATION WAS INVOlVEO OURING ONLY
808480229019942SS20NE OAY
808480229019942671THERE WERE SO"'E OFfIC!ALS '-1ALTRAITES OR STONED. THI5 FIGURE
a08480229019942672IS A GUESS
8084802290199416 71CL ARENC MENT IONS NO '.oIOUNOED ANO S T A TES THA T NONE '"ERE K 1 LLE'J.
80S480229019941672NEWSPAPERS VARY FROM 1 TO 7 AND 1 TO 3
808480229019941721S0ME ESTIMATES ARE lO#ER AND 81< 8UT 98 !S OFTEN PEPEATEO
808480229019941722AND U5ED 8Y CLA'lENC. 10 .:ERE PROSCECuTEO ANO FOUNO GUtLTY
80S480229019951131THE 5EOUENCE PRESENTEO 8EnO/EEN T'"!E nw xx COOES 15 TouE:
80S4S0229019951132SEOUENCE aUT A RECREATION OF A TYPICAL INCIDENT. 10-12
S08480229019951133lNCIDENTS OF S!MILAR "lATURE TOO<: PLACE eEr-.'EEN FES 29 ANO
80S4802290199S1134MAR 3. ANO TrERE IS NO TO CODE ThEM AFTfR
808480229019951135THE SECQNO xx, THE SATTLE OF MAO 3 I5 COOfO AS USUAL
S08480229019952131THE SEOUENCE PI<ESENTEO BETwEEN THE T'>IO xx CODES 15 "lOT roUE'
808480229019952132SEQUENCE BUT A RECREATION OF A TYPICAL INCIOENT. 10-12
808480229019952133TNCIDENTS OF SIMILAR NAT'\RE TOO-< PLACE 8ETWEEN FEe 29 ANO
80S4S0229019952134MAR 3. ANO 15 NO ROOM TO CODE SEQUENTIALLY. AFTEq
808480229019952135THE SECONO xx. THE SATTLE OF MAO 3 15 COOEO AS USUAl
8084802290199511711NVASION Of MAIRIE. OE L'ENREr.ISTG:E/A-ENT OR BUREAU OF
808480229019951172THE FORE5TIER. SUBSE,JUENT Of RECOROS ANO -.!ISTPF.ATING
8084S02290199523114 VICTIN - A OWNER
80848022901995143HlA"lCH 3. NOON, AT ANTICHAN. ROU"IOING UP OF
8084S0229019951432CONTINUES UNITL 5 P M
3 NQON AT UP OF PRISONERS CONTINU,S
80B4802-290199S3432uNT1L 5 P 'I
80B480<.>29019965141CH.IINGE IN 'lEGIME
808480229019965441FOKMAT!ON S3 IS LA"" ENfORCEMENT FOPCE. HOWEvER DIVISION
8084802290199654428ETL,/EEN 51 AND 52 COl'8ItJES OlfFE;.>ENCES OF OCCUPATI01;l ANO
80S480229019965443PROPERTY
S08480229019966511A (,REAT NUMBER OF pueLIC RECOROS BURNEO IN ALMOST EvEqy TOWN.
SOS4S02290199665121"OSTLY PERToINING TO COOE FORESTIERS. LlSTS OF fP'e:
OS4S0229019966513ANO PROCES-vERBAUX. RECORDS Of DEBTS ALSO 8ur:<ro. <AINOR
808480229019966S14PROPERTY OAMAGE TO PU8LlC BUILDINGS. A HUISSIEc':S HouSE ,'AS
S084S022901996E>515PILLAGEO ANO STOLEN IN MAULEEN-BAHOUSSE. t. P!G. SO!.!E
8084S0229019966516POHK ANO SDME WINE WAS TA"EN IN SOST, A4MS AN" It.lSIGNE OF
8084802290199665170f AOMINISTRATEUR fORESTIER STOLEN. PILLAGE IN lOURES-
80S4S0229019966518BAHOUSSE, HousE INVAOEO AND PILLAGEO IN ANTICHAN. 6
IN TR08AT ANO 8ERTREN. MONEY ANO PROvISIONS STOLEN
S084S0<.>290199665191N ANLA. FLAG TORN IN IlftOURT. LARGEST AT A
808480229019966519PROPIETAIRE:"'5 CHATEAU IN LUSCAN TREES 'tiERE CUT.
808480229019966519GRILLF.5 BROKEN, ODORS 8G:OKEN IN. fURN!TURE OR STOLEN.
8084S0229019966519ANQ LINEN ANO BOOKS OESTROYEO OR TAKEN
80S.:.802290 19966551 TH I S ISA LOw ESTII-\A TE. 30.000 FRANCS DA"IAGE AL ONE AT CHA TEA
8084802290199665520E LUSCAN
808480229019966731ALTHOUGH COMPLETELY ST!FLEO. THIS DISTUR8At.lCE
8084S0229019966732lATER INCIDENTS. NOTABLY A PLOT TO ASSASSTNATE RECEvEUR OE
THE APRIL 17 DISTURSANCE AT SIGNAC. AND
8084S0229019966734THE INCIDENT AT BIZE-NISTOS AT THE END OF
8084802290199701S1MO 184S-03-10%SS2-583<.LS 1848-03-11
......... <> ...... <> ........ <> <> ...... ,,<> ..... <> .. -I> <> <> -1>" <>.0 ........... <>" -I> <> 0'" <>" <> <> <> 0 0 <> <> <> <> 0'" <><>'" <> <>-I> <>-I> <> <> ... <> <>....., <> <> <> <> .. <> <> <>:
________ 393364 ________________ 393364 ________________ 393364----------------;
Joe NO. 393364
UNlvERSITY OF "IICHIGAN SYSTEM
Cl\qO LIST
Materials from the Study of Collective Violence in France 269
84802290121986511522100000000012201,0000003105101 006 2071 000 1 SOST 12298650801,2800
000000012204000000810510100620710001 HAULEON P AROUSSE 123986501063800000000012201,00000081051
010062071 OOOll\NTICHAN 12498550101,1800000000012201, 00000081 051 0 1 006 2071 0001 ANLA
12598310762130000000001220400000081051010062071000 UU SCAN 1269865
11102800000000012204000000810510100620710001 SARP 127983101603700000000012204000
00810510100620710001ARBi\ZON 128986506620900000000012201,00000081051010062071 OOOU Z
12998650751, 1 100000000012 204 00000081 0 510 1 006 2071 0001 LOli RES BAROUSS;::
311lRIGANOS 53120001010001000733003014 2010101320420214120020354060132VICTINES llE R
IGANOAGE 9112000202000100012600201100101018183851050200201 01010033REPRESSIVE FORCES 9012000
1020103000144007071001. 0 101. 83 7 4 000 13120060 1 020 100 34 9898989898989898989989398
989891398989398989398989898989835 9898989898989898989989898989898989896989898
98939898989836 9898989898989898989989898989898989898989893989898989898 3 7
9898989898989898989989898989898%989898989898989898989838
9898989898989898989989898989898989898989898989898 9898 9819 989898989898939
898998989898989898989898989898989898989841010104 0301 020120ANDE CONSI OEMBLE 01800020407 743046000
5020000000050300980111084 2000000000000001 ONO KEY IIOROS 000300901. 07 243 000100 1 ()400000000S0600
000001014 30404060 1 01 0 )01200EUX COLONNES 00800090(,0051100800040100000000000000000010144989898
9898989888 9898998989989898989989899898989898989898989845 9898 989898989888
98989989899898989899898998989898989898989898469898989898989888
9898998989989898989939899898989898989398 9898/' 7 989898 9898 98 9888 9898998989989898
989989899898989898989898 989M8 98 9898 989898 9888 939899898998989$9899898998989898
989898989898499898989898989888 9898998939989898989 989S99S 98 989898 9898 989 898 51 00
011831582811, 015648 18 58 28164 00264 54 553,S1990000000000000000000000000 15 20000251 15 515 7 515 15 7 51515 3020 200
0202020202020000000000000000000000000153002020202020202020202020202020225453813404000000000000000000
00000000154 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000055000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000570000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005800000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000590000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000060000305050606050511050505050511030405071213989898989898989898989
89801650301l300102102l 102&103 980201SJOSJACQUERIE CR,AVES DESORORES t6600026J0030S077t,
300054100602000000001003009801909$ 34 }l 0125402015001020 )040 717 0 t 01 011 0 7 0401 00313000 1 03 9 9 660719660817 7
8480l00012101540740270000000001}1 00000000 3 7 200 1 00 1 001 001 001 L IXHEIN 12298 99989S9800
000098989898989898998998998998998998 23989998989800000098 989S 9898 9898 99899
8998998998998 2/'989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
25989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
98989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
269899
27 98 99 9898980000009398 9898 989
28989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
29989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
898998998998998998998
3WEN I.IVING NEAR 1.1XHEIN 621000010000400000000010025000000170000211020020010060032CliRE
99100002740000000011,00102000101018000000010200" 0001010011 9898989
9898989898989898989989$98
9898989398989898989989$98989898989898989898
989898989898989898998989898989898989898989898989898989817
989898989898989898998989891'\989898989898989898989898989838
8989898989899898989898989898989898989898989898983!'
98989898989898989898989898989815
98989898989816
98989898989898989899898989898989898989898989898 9898 989839 989898989898989
898998989898989898989898989898989898 989841 0000000000000l21NO KEY HORDS 0020001 () 29 981 000 2000
2030000000000098980000004 29803989898980101 NO KEY HORDS 0000101009981000001 0001 0000000000000
00000000 89898989898989888 9898998989989898989989899898989898989898989844989898
9898989888 989$ 99898 998 98 98989989899898 98 9398 98 9$98 98981, 5 9898 9898 98 989888
9898998989989898989989899(1989898989898989898469898989898989888
270 Appendix 2
9898998989989898989989$99898989898989$ 9898 984 7 98 9898 98 989888 9898998989989898
9899898998989898989898989898489898989898989888 98989989899898989899898998989898
989898989898499898989898989888 98989989$998989898998989989898989898989898985102
5952 5838 50000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001520171700020200000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000153000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000054 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005 5000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000005 7 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005800000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005900000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000060011103101098989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989
898016502030000198 9800022403PESORDRES CRAVES 166000020101029981
00000201020300000000000000989800909800210012902404 3010004 04 000000002 07 032 68 03 2 000000032 6607196608160
84803140121015907343007 54 30000111 01 05090211 012 01, 13 372 2 614 52 LILLE 1229$ 9998 989800
00009898989898989899899$998998998998 2398999898980000009898989898989899899
8998998998998 21,989998989$0000009898989898989899$ 998 998 998 998 998
259$ 9998 989800000098 9898 98 9898 98 998998998 998 998 998 269899
98989800000098989898989898998998998998998998 '27989998989800000098989898989
898998998998998998998 28989998989$00000098989898 989R98 998 9 98998 9 98 998998
29989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
310UVRI ERS 53710002300030420100000003501000637441160512 00201 000002 32NA11ONAL CU!\RD
3110000384014 S4 5012 6000001 001 00017 0800001312 00601 02 000033 989898
9
8989898989899898989898989898989$ 989$ 9898 9898 98 9834 9898989898989898989989$98
98989898989898989898989898989835 9898989898989898989989898989898989898989898
98989898989836 989898989898989898998989898989898989898989898989898 98 933
7
98989898989898989899898989$989898989898989898989898989$38
989898989898989898998989$ 9898 9898 9898 98 9898 9898 9898 9$ 98 3 9 98989898989898
9
89899898989898989$ 9898 9898 9898 9898 9898 98t, 1 0004 000002 0001l, 1 OOUVRIERS, EMEUTIERS 01000070401210010000
4000000000150500170110001> 204 04 0601 02 03012 ONO 1<EY ,-lORDS 00200040
1
,01210002000
1
,0100000001 50400
000001 O(}t, 3 989$ 9898 9898 9888 98989989899898989899898998989$ 989898 98 9898 984 4 989898
9898989888 989899898998989898998989989898989898989898984 59$989$ 9898 989888
989899898998989898998989989898989898989898981,69898989898989888
98989989899898989899898998989898989898989898479898 9$ 9898 98 9888 9898998989989898
9899898998989898989898989898489898989898989888 98989989899898989899898998989898
989898989898499898989898989888 989899898998989898998989989898989898989898985103
8t,22352000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001521'.1333333330000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000001 53000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000005
1
, 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005 5000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000005600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000005 7 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000058 00000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000590000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000060050505139898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989898989
898016502012600102102 102&102&102 800202410lTROULES, SCENES TO M!JLTEUSES166000120007050121
0000120005000000000030050017010098000099851 02014301 0001 07 06150000051 07 032 6803 71 000003 7 06607 2 0660817
2
85098989898
84803220121014310324900000000011201000000001 001 001999000000PUY 12
2
989998989800
000098989898989898998998998998998998 2398999898980000009898989898989899899
8998998998998 24989998989800000098989898989898998998998998998998
Materials lram the Study 01 Collective Violence in France 271
RUN VII--FORMATION TYPE X-TABS CORRECTION
QUALIFYING DATA ONLY
GENERAL SAMPLE 1830-1960
COUNT OF
FORNATION TYPES
BY YEAR, 1845-51
ROI.,rS '" FORMATION TYPE, COLUMNS YEAR OF ANALYSIS.
1845 1846 1847 1848 1849
SIMPLE
CROIID! 21 81 401 41 51 11>1
1 I! 1.141 11 1 41 SI 181
IDEO-
LOGlCAL 1 ! 51 i 321 161 51 2i,]
1_ 1 1.661 I I SI 17J
GUERRIL:
BANDITS' J I ; I I 251
PVTARNY ! ! I I I! 1 1 261
OTHER : - --- ---- - : ---- -----! -- ---- ---1---------1-------- -: --- --- --.. :
AC'fIV- J 1 1 : 31 1 1 2& I
IS1$ 1 I I 1 i: 1 J 261
PUBL1C ; - - -- --" -- :. - -- ----; ---- -----1-- ---- ---1---------: ---------; --- ----
OFFCIAL 1 1 21 l: 41 21 81
1 1 11 11 1 04: 41 21 SI
OFFC1AL ; - - - -- - -; : - - - - -- - -: ---- --- -: --: --I ---- -- --:: - - - - - -- -:! ------ --
TROOPS ! 21 41 41 161 41 SI 261
POLICE 1 11 11 I 161 41 SI 281
1 _________ 1 _________ 1 11 11 11 1.011
REGULAR! 1 11 -------- -1---------1-- -------1
TROOPS 1 I 11 : SI 61 11 121
1 I 11 I 1 61 1I 121
OTHER
H1L1TRY I I 61 441 61 21 51
I I 11 11 I 91 31 61
POLICE
ANO 1 1 :1 'l] 31 21 121
MIL1TRY 1 1 1I 11 91 31 21 121
POLICE : -- -- ----;: -- -- ----;: --- ----
1 21 21 131 g: SI 31 1'l1
I 11 11 11 I1 81 31 201
1-- -------1----- ----1-- ---- - --! ---------1------ - _:: ------- -
SUM KEY
103 RAW
108 WTD
1.04 l1EN
82 RAW
94 lno
1.14 HEN
26 RAW
27 WTD
1. 03 :MEN
29 RAW
29 WTD
1 MEN
41
42 WTD
1. 02 l1EN
61 RA\4
63 WTD
1. 03 MEN
28 RAW
30 WTO
1.07 MEN
65 RAH
72 !1TD
1.1 MEN
38 RAH
38 WTD
1 l'1EN
59 RAW
60 WTD
1. 01 MEN
272 Appendix 2 Materials [rom the Study of Collective Violence in France 273
RUN VII--FORHATION TYPE X-TABS CORRECTION
QUALIFYING DATA ONLY
GENERAL SANFLE 1830-1960
COUNT OF
FORMATION TYPES
BY YEAR, 1845-51
ROWS FORMATION TYPE. COLillms '" YEAR OF ANALYSIS.
CCUPA
W/SAME
LOCALE
1845 1.846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851
! ___ ___ _ 1 __ -- -- --- --- - - {------ ---1---- -----1- -------- (---------1
! 11 41 11 131 1 I 1
! It 41 11 1 S 1 1 I 1
1 11 \I 11 1. I') 1 1 1 I
OCCUPA I l' 11 l! 181 31 41 21
W/SAME 1 11 41 21 12I SI SI 21
INDSTRY I 11 11 1.221 1.661 1.2')1 11
1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1--------1
OTHER! 11 31 151 161 51 11 11
OCCUPA 1 21 31 161 161 51 11 11
GROUp! 21 11 1.061 11 11 11 11 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1
GROUP 1 I 1 1 IZI I I I1
OUTSIDEl 1 1 1 121 1 I 11
ORIGIN t I I I1 1 I 11
1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1
USERS 1 I 111 I1 21 I 11 11
SAME 1 J IZ! 11 21 I 11 11
RESOURC I I 1.091 11 11 1 11 11 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 ___ ------(---------1
OTHERS I 11 61 121 181 41 31 1'<1
I \I e-I 191 201 41 31 151
I I1 11 1.581 1.111 11 I1 1.071 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 _________ 1 ___ ------1---------1
10 61 83 268 63 34 194
SUMS
11 66 91 290 70 36 203
1.1 1.08 1.09 1.08 1.11 1.05 1.04
*****TABLE TOTALS... RAW'" 713 WTD'" 767
SUM KEY
19 RAI.j
21 \"'1'D
1.1 MEN
33 RAW
41 WTD
1.24 NEN
tl2 RAH
44 iVTD
1.04 NEN
13 RAH
13 inD
1 MEN
16 &J\l.j
17 WTD
L06 MEN
58 RAH
68 lITD
L17 HEN
713 RA\I
767
1. 07 HEN
Table 4 Participants in collective violence per 100,000 population by urbanity
of department, 1830-1859, eorrected to annual rates
Percent of
population
. in eWes of
10,000 or more 1830-34 1835-39 1840-44 1845-49 1850-54 1855-59
0.0 17 4 40 25 152
0.1-5.0 23 22 16 70 70
5.1-10.0 53 22 48 68 43
10.1-15.0 104 19 10 81 15
15.1+ 731 57 64 689 86
Total 147 22 37 210 56
Total
, participants
(thousands) 240 41 64 371 101
144
Number of Disturbanees, 1830-1860
120
U)
w
u
Z
<l: 96
m
a::
::J
I-
U)
72
Cl
ll..
0
a::
48
w
m
::lE
::J
Z
0 1830 1833 1836 1839 1842 1845 1848 1851
YEAR
1854 1857
0
0
9
2
0
3
5
1860
Appendix 3
Procedureslorlhe
Slud., 01 eonlenlious
Galherings in
Greal Brilain
GENERAL
Our newest large eHort is a study of conflicts in Great Britain from 1828
through 1834. We have several diHerent incentives for undertaking the new
analysis. First, our analyses of violent events in Italy, Germany, and France
appeared to confirm our supposition that the violence was on the whole the
by-product of the intervention of further interested parties in actions which
were not intrinsically violent and which occurred frequently without signifi-
cant violence. In particular, we were interested in the frequency with which
the violence began with the intervention of troops, police, and other special-
ized repressive forces. Since the only nonviolent events of which we had made
large, systematic enumerations for some of the same periods and places were
strikes, however, we did not have the evidence to look closely at that relation-
ship between nonviolent and violent collective actions.
Second, it seemed worth making a sustained comparison between pat-
terns of conflict in nineteenth-century Britain and those we had found on the
Continent. Students of modern Europe often think of nineteenth-century
Britain's experience as a kind of success story-at least in "avoiding" the revo-
lutions which occurred in France, Germany, Italy, and elsewhere. A close
study of conflicts in Britain should give us the means to rethink that question.
More important, it should provide firmer ground for choosing among obvious
alternative explanations of the differences between Britain and the continent:
that Britain had fewer of the kinds of people who made nineteenth-century
revolutions and rebellions, that the most likely rebels had fewer grievances,
that repression was more effective in Britain, and so on.
Our original hope was to examine the changing patterns of conflict in
Britain throughout the nineteenth century. With a wide range of nonviolent
events to consider I however I that action would have required an enormous
effort-many times the already formidable eHort per year in our studies of
274
Procedures for the Study 01 Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 275
France and Germany. After some prelirninary enumerations in scattered years
from the end of the eighteenth century to the end of the nineteenth, we nar-
rowed our attention to 1828-1834. That period recommends itself for several
reasans. First, it was a time of major movements, conflicts and collective
actions: Catholic Emancipation, Reform agitation, industrial conflict, the
attack on select vestries, and the great agrarian rebellions of 1830. Second,
there eXIst excellent historical studies of some of the period' s conflicts-for
example, Captain Swing, by E. j. Hobsbawm and George Rude-with which
we can compare our own results. Third, we have some reason to believe that
the period acted as an historical pivot in something like the same way that the
revolutIOns of 1848 did in Franee and Germany: marking, and perhaps pro-
ducmg, a shlft from reactive to proactive, from "backward-looking" to "for-
ward-looking" collective action on the part of ordinary people.
In that period, we are attempting to enumerate, describe, and analyze a
large share of all the "contentious gatherings" which occurred in England,
Wales. Roughly speaking, a contentious gathering is an occa-
stOn In WhlCh ten or more persons outside the government gather in the same
place and make a visible claim which, if realized, would affect the interests of
some specific pe.rson(s) or group(s) outside their own number. In principle,
these gathenngs mclude Just about all the events covered in our earlier enumer-
ations of strikes and collective violence. They also include a great many other
events: demonstrations, petition meetings, delegations, group poaching, and
plenty of others. Drawing the boundaries both generously and consistently is a
delicate and laborious task.
We are still adjusting the procedures for that task. After doing a trial
enumeratIOn and summary coding of some events from 1830, we did a prelimi-
nary scanning of thirty randomly selected ten-day blocks from the entire six-
year period, then proceeded to enumerate systematically from the beginning of
1828. We have completed the preliminary enumeration of 1828. 'We find the
via a issue-by-issue reading of the Morning Chronicle. The
T,mes, Gentlemen s Magazine, Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, The Mirror
of Parhament, and the Annual Register. Onee the events are enumerated, we
plan to look for more information about them in the papers of the Horne
Office (of which :ve have already built up substantial selections via photocopy
and mlcrofdm), m other periodicals, and in secondary historical works. We
are still making plans for coding of the information in machine-readable form.
The file for the six-year period will probably deseribe on the order of 25,000
events.
. We are also slowly making plans for the collection of data on the popula-
tions and areas "at risk" to contentious gatherings. The units of observation
will certainly include all counties of England, Scotland, and Wales. They will
276 Appendix 3
probably include complete sets.of hundreds of parishes within selected COun-
ties. If possible, they will also include particular populations of potential
actors-for example, the hand100m weavers of Lancashire and the agricultural
laborers of Leicestershire. UItimately the choice of units and of kinds of data
concerning . those units will result from a compromise between the arguments
we are seekmg to test and the costs of getting the relevant evidence.
Events to be Enumerated
The events are "contentious gatherings" (CGs), occasions in which ten or more
persons outside the government gather in the same place and make a visible
claim which, if realized, would affect the interests of some specific person(s) or
group(s) outside their own numbers. Most CGs in our period fall into one or
more of th: following categories: (1) collective violence, (2) meetings, (3)
demonstratIOns, (4) parades, (5) assemblies, (6) rallies, (7) celebrations, (8)
delegations, (9) strikes, (10) union activities. More precisely, the events in-
cluded are all occasions:
1 reported in the London Times, Morning Chronicle, Hansard's Parliamen-
tary Debates, Annual Register, Gentlemen's Magazine and/or The Mirrar
of Parliament;
2 occurring in England, Scotland, or Wales;
3 beginning on any date from 1 January 1828 through 31 December 1834;
4 in which ten or more persons outside the government:
a) gather in the same place,
b) make a visible claim which, if realized, would affect the interests of
some specific person(s) or group(s) outside their own number.
Terms which therefore require working definitions
reported
occurring
in England,.Scotland, or Wales
beginning
persons
DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF THUMB
Reported
outside the government
gather same place
visible claim affecting interests
specific person(s) or group(s)
Any ~ e n t i o n in any context. lf, for example, an M.P. lays on the table a peti-
tIOn from a numerous meeting in Oldham" which conforms to all our other
criteria, that meeting enters the sampie. In parliamentary debates, mentions of
Procedures for the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 277
meetings do not need numerical information to be included. For example, if
Mirrar of Parliament reports a meeting of parishioners at Preston to petition
Parliament, but makes no mention of how many people attended the meeting,
we will assurne provisionally that at least ten people took part.
Occurring in England, Scotland or Wales
Ten or more people must have gathered within the political boundaries
(including territorialwaters) of England, Scotland, or Wales. lf any part of the
action occurs within those boundaries, the entire event falls into the sampie.
Sometimes it is difficult to determine how many people are involved in an
event or action. In vague cases take the following terms to mean at least ten
people:
AFFRAY
ASSEMBLY
BRAWL
CONCOURSE
CROWD
DEMONSTRATION
DISTURBANCE
GANG
GATHERING
GENERAL BODY IBODY
MOB
MULTITUDE
NUMEROUS
RALLY
RIOT
RIOTOUS ASSEMBLAGE
THRONG
TUMULTUOUS ASSEMBL Y
Beginning on any date from 1 January 1828 through 31 December 1834
The event begins at the first point at which at least ten of the people who even-
tually make the visible claim are gathered without further dispersal befere they
make the claim. The day begins at midnight.
Persons
Any human being who can reasonably be presurned to have intentionally par-
ticipated in the rnaking of the claim.
Outside the government
When officers are acting inthe capacity given them by their offices and no
group of ten or more nonofficers is acting with them, we exclude the action. lf
ten or more officers act together but on their own responsibility, we include
their action. Among the sets of people cornmonly named in discussions of Eng-
lish governments in the nineteenth century, we are actually distinguishing
three categories, (a) officers, (b) public committees, and (c) citizenry. As offi-
cers, we are considering
27$ Appendix 3
Alderman Horse Guards Paymasters
Bailiffs Judges Police
Beadles Justices Police Constables
Boroughreeves Justices of the Peace Privy Councilers
Burgesses Lord Lieutenants Schoolboards
Churchwardens Magistrates Sheriffs
Common Councilers Mayors Scotch Guards
Constables Members of Parliament Special Constables
Coroners Military' Surveyors
Directors of the Poor Militia Town Councilers
Grand Juries Ministers Yeomanry
Guardians of the Poar Overseers of the Poor
and others of essentially similar position.
As public committees we are considering Town Meetings, Vestries, Select
Vestries, Liveries, Improvement Commissions, Police Commissions, and
essentially similar organizations.
As segments of the citizenry we are considering Freeholders, House-
holders, Inhabitants, Landowners, Leypayers, Occupiers, Parishioners, Rate-
payers, Tithepayers, and essentially similar collections of people. One day we
may well want to analyze the actions of public committees, of segments of the
citizenry, and of other groups (such as members of particular crafts, associ-
ations, age-sex groups or families) separately. For the present, the crudal dis-
tinction separates officers from all the rest. Officers olten appear as parties in
collective actions involving public committees, segments of the dtizenry,
and/or other groups. But the only drcumstances under which their concerted
action qualifies by itself is when they take part in a group of ten or more per-
sons who on their own responsibility assemble to make a publicly visible
claim, demand, or complaint.
As citizens we are considering everyone else.
Gather same place
Ten or more persons, meeting, assembling, or any of the key words listed
earlier to define a get-together. Place is defined as:
a) spedfic location, church, inn, Held;
b) secondary location, town, parish, city;
c) area location, county, hundred, etc.;
or any combination of (a), (b), and (c).
*Cavalry, Infantry, Dragoons, Hussars, Marines, Blues, Grays
Procedures for the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 279
Visible claims affecting interests of some speeifie persons or groups
We are trying to prepare a comprehensive list of occasions where people out-
side the government assemble to make a publicly visible claim, demand, or
complaint. At one time or another, we use all the following words to describe
what we're after: claims, demands, complaints, grievances, aspirations, inter-
ests, dissatisfactions. Some of these words, such as "demands," clearly have an
object outside the group. Others, like "dissatisfactions," do not necessarily
have outside objects; one can easily be dissatisfied with oneself. We want to
concentrate on actions which do have a target outside the acting group. Let's
talk about claims and objeets of claims. We are trying to build a sampie of
gatherings in which-or by which-people articulate claims on actors outside
their own group.
What sorts of claims? Basically, any expectation which would, if realized,
require the other aetor to expend valued resourees: money, labor-power,
information, and so on. What sorts of actors? Basically, any other set of real
people. That excludes a group's claims on itself. It excludes a group's claims on
supernatural or imaginary beings. It does not however, exclude claims on an
imaginary "power structure," if the group identifies some real people with that
structure. Nor does it exclude claims on real people in their capacities as self-
declared agents of supernatural beings or imaginary groups: priests, sooth-
sayers, eharlatans, members of invented conspiracies. It does not exclude
claims on real people present at the same gathering, just so Iong as there is a
we/they separation between actors and objects which is not simply an internal
division of the acting group and which is more durable than the gathering it-
self. In fact, "any other set of real people" does not exclude any individual any-
where, just so Iong as there is a gathering in which enough people articulate
claims on that individual.
When describing the possible content of such claims, we enumerate:
a) petitioning or addressing or memorializing 10eal or national government,
either for or against government;
b) opposition to government policy, form of government, or particular
agents of it;
c) support for government;
d) support for an enemy of government;
e) control of 10eal government or institution;
f) other grievances and dissatisfactions, including religious, social or ece-
nomic issues, discussion of complaints about wages, hours, or conditions
efwerk;
280 Appendix 3
Here are some rules of thumb for the identification of qualifying and non-
qualifying claims:
1 In the absence of contradictory information, collective violence o n s t i ~
tutes prima fade evidence of a claim. If ten or more persons act together to
attack, damage, or forcibly seize a person or object, that is provisional evi-
dence of a claim.
2 Even if the ultimate aim of the activity is the making of some sort of
claim, purely organizational efforts do not qualify in themselves. For example,
the creation of a loeal Reform Association does not in itself constitute a claim.
If, on the other hand, ten or more persons who are organizing an association
state a qualifying claim as they do so, that claim counts.
3 Benefit suppers, balls, expositions, and the like do not qualify in them-
selves, regardless of the cause for which they are conducted. If, however, we
acquire further evidence of the making of a claim (e.g., a claim-making procla-
mation by the organizers of the benefit, or a widely-cheered claim-making
speech in the course of the event), a benefit qualifies in the same way any other .
gathering qualifies.
4 A speech by a single person which states a claim, articulates a grievance,
or makes a demand eonstitutes evidence of a eolleetive claim under any of
these conditions: (a) the group formally adopts the speaker's views by petition,
resolution, or memorial; (b) the reporter explicitly imputes approval of the
claim to the participants in the gathering; (c) the group manifestly voices an
opinion by cheering, jeering, or other vocal display.
5 If a gathering includes two or more factions, at least one of which has ten
or more participants, claims made by one of the factions on another qualify if
the issues and divisions in question extend beyond the partieular gathering and
the partieular set of participants. For example, when Henry Hunt and his sup-
porters show up at a parish vestry meeting and challenge the powers of the
local elite to control the election of new vestry offieers, the division extends be-
yond that meeting, and the claim qualifies.
6 Explicit support for government, or denial of support to government,
qualifies. It can take the form of support for institutions (Parliament, the
present government, the constitution) or of support for specifie officers of
government: the aldermen, bailiffs, beadles, boroughreeves, and so on, listed
earlier. It can take the form of deliberate denial of support for these institu-
tions or officers. The institutions and officers must be currently in office; for
example, acelebrating banquet for a member-elect of Padiament does not in
itself qualify. Evidence of such support or denial includes (a) participation in
events, including celebrations and festivities, whose commonly understood
Procedures for the Study of Contenfious Gatherings in Great Britain 281
purpose is the display of support, e.g" Lord Mayor's Day parade; (b) the re-
porter's imputation of support or rejection; (c) articulation of a sentiment
through cheering, jeering, and so on. However, a simple toast (e.g., "To the
King") does not quality in itself, even if participants cheer.
7 Gatherings explicitly conducted to support or condemn an action of
government state qualifying claims if the participants themselves artieulate
sentiments by passing resolutions, cheering speeches, and so on.
8 Simple expressions of support or rejection do not qualify if the objects are
(a) nongovernmental institutions or officers in Britain or elsewhere, (b)
governmental institutions or offieers outside of Britain. If a gathering makes
further claims on either of these categories of objects, however, the claims
qualify. For example, a banquet in honor of the deposed king of Spain would
not qualify unless the partieipants directly stated the demand that he be
reinstated.
BOUNDARIES OF CONTENTIOUS GATHERINGS
Most CGs will occur on one day at one location; however, many will last
longer and/or will take place at several sites, so we must delineate boundaries
in time and space. Activities will be considered to be part of the same CG if:
1 they oeeur on the same day, or on eonseeutive days and
2 there is strong evidence of overlapping personnel within the citizen forma-
tion(s), such as continuous interaction between two or more of the forma-
tions iclentifiecl in the initial activity and
3 the activities involve the same issue, or some directly related issue (e.g.,
the escalation of demands).
Activities that meet the above criteria will be defined as one CG even though
they occur in different locations (e.g., different towns). .
If an event qualifies on the grounds of the kind of action and kind of
group involved, but we lack sufficient information to assign it a time and place
in Britain from 1828 through 1834, we exclude the event pending further infor-
mation. If only one of these elements-time or place-is uneertain, we include
the event pending further information.
GENERAL AGENDA fR CODING
This is a provisional set of plans for the preparation of a machine-readable
description of each CG. The record for a single event will contain the follow-
ing seetions:
282 Appendix 3
1 EVENT as a whole, including identifieation and summary deseription of
all major features.
2 PLACE: one unit per plaee in whieh the event oeeurred.
3 FORMATION: one unit per formation participating in the event.
4 ACTION-PHASE: one unit per action by any formation.
S SOURCE: one unit per souree from which information eoneerning this
event was drawn.
6 COMMENTS: one unit per eomment-all keyed to speeifie loeations in
seetions 1-5.
1. Event Seetion
Identifieation number: starting date plus sequenee number on that date
Aeeuraey of starting date
Day of week on which event began
Date on which event ended
Aeeuraey of ending date
Duration: days
Duration: hours
Low estimate of total participants
High estimate of total partieipants
Best estimate of total partieipants
Best estimate of person-days + margin of error
Best estimate of person-hours + margin of error
Best estimate of arrests during event + margin of error
Best estimate of arrests after event + margin of error
Best estimate of wounded during event + margin of error
Best estimate of killed during event + margin of error
Number of formations
Summary of formation type(s)
Summary of participation by authorities
Summary of repression exercised during event
Summary of repression exercised after event
Summary of major target(s) of action
Broad event type
Summary of background
Summary of outeome
Procedures for the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 283
2. Plaee Seetion
One unit per plaee in which the action oeeurred. A "place" is any named
loeation, plus any unnamed loeation in which we have strong reason to believe
that some portion of the action oeeurred. We produee a unit for "someplaee"
in two circumstances: (1) we cannot locate the action in at least one specific
parish; (2) we have strong reason to believe that some portion of the action
oeeurred outside the plaees for whieh the aeeount eontains speeifie names. A
"name" ean be very general: by the river, on the road, at the market, and so
on.
a) For initial coding
Principal name of plaee, alphabetic. Parish takes priority. If it is impossible,
name county; if county is impossible, country. Place inferred locations in
parentheses. Thus OXFORD means the aeeount specifically mentions Oxford,
(OXFORD) that we have inferred the loeation from the aeeount or its eontext.
Detailed name of plaee, alphabetic. Blank if we have a parish name and no
other plaee information. SOMEPLACE if the principal plaee is a county or a
eountry (England, Seotland, Wales) and we have no further information on
location within the county or country; a more specific designation such as
"near Norwich" (in parentheses if inferred) takes preeedenee over SOME-
PLACE. SOMEPLACE ELSE for additional plaees not speeifieally named.
b) For coding after alphabetic sort of place seelions
Sequenee number for grid square loeation: 0 if some portion definitely took
place in this grid square loeation; 1.10 9 if one of a cluster of 1 to 9 possible
continuous grid square locations, used to describe irregular shapes, e. g., a
street, town, riverbank, road. Note: this means that a single plaee reeord may
eontain 1 to 9 subreeords for grid square loeation.
Grid square loeation per Gazetteer: two letters plus five digits
Verticalloeation within grid square: 0 if not known, 1 to 9 if known
Horizontallocation within grid square; 0 if not known, 1 to 9 if known
Margin of error for grid square loeation
Loeation in British eensus of 1831: nine digits
NOTE on the Plaee Seetion . This is not the only information on plaees that we
will eventually have available for analysis. We plan to eonstruet aseparate
Plaee File including at least all parishes in which events oeeurred and all
eounties, whether or not events oeeurred in them. The addition of further
plaees, if any, will depend on eost, eonvenienee, and analytie urgeney. The
likely items of information in such a file are
284 Appendix 3
name of the administrative unit (parish, etc.)
proper name of the place
position within administrative hierarchy: parish, hundred, county, etc.
grid square location per Gazetteer
location in 1831 census
population in 1831
other characteristics of that place: presence or absence of market, extent
of manufacturing, etc.
characteristics of speeific location within that place: inn, church, public
square, shop, etc.
enumeration of all events occurring in that place
3'. For.mation Sedion
One unit per formation known to be present. Every participant must be
assigned to at least one formation. 50 must every action: if we know some
action occurred, but can't assign it to a specific formation, we create a
formation named SOMEONE. There may be more than one. SOMEONE. In
that case, we name them SOMEONE 1, SOMEONE 2, ....
A formation is a set of people who act together and/or interact with
another formation in the course of the event. The first formation named must
have 10+ rnembers. We divide the remainder into as few formations as possi-
ble: generally one formation for each set of people who act distinguishably in
the course of the event.
Formation numbers: two digits
Overlap with other formations: list of other formation's numbers
Relation of this formation to event: partieipant, spectator, etc.
Name(s) of formation: alphabetic, including SOMEONE (in parentheses if the
name is inferred rather than given explieitly)
Social composition of formation: alphabetic, including DK (don't know)
Other words describing formation: alphabetic, including NONE [in paren-
theses if inferred from account, e.g., (LED BY T AILOR)]
Place of origin or normal residence: alphabetic, including DK
Words used to describe magnitude of formation: alphabetic, including NONE
[in parentheses if inferred frorn account, e.g., (GROUP FILLED SQUARE)]
Number of participants: low estimate (50+ at least 50, 101 + more than
100, etc.)
Number of partieipants: high estimate
Procedures for the Study of Cententious Gatherings in Great Britain 285
Nurnber of partieipants: best estimate
50urce of best estirnate: code (when the available accounts contain more than
one estimate, write COMMENT)
Number of person-days: best estimate (00 unknown, 01 partieipation
lasted less than one day)
Number of person hours: best estimate. 00 unknown, 01 less than 1
hour. Person-days and person-hours are additive. For example, 025, 075
means 25 person-days + 75 person-hours, a reasonable estimate for a for-
mation of 25 people in continuous action for 1 day plus three more hours. 01,
75 means 0 person-days + 75 person-hours. Note alternative estimates as
COMMENTS.
Source of best estimate: code
Best estimate of number arrested. Note alternative estimates as COMMENTS.
Source of best estimate: code
Best estimate of number wounded. Note alternative estimates as COM-
MENTS.
Source of best estimate: code
Best estimate of number killed. Note alternative estimates as COMMENTS.
Source of best estimate: code
Note: best estimates of person-days, person-hours, arrests, wounded, killed
must each sum to totals given in EVENT SECTION.
4. Action-Phase Seetion
An event begins at the first point at which at least ten of the people who even-
tually make a claim which would qualify the event for inclusion in our sampie
are gathered without dispersing before they make the claim. Th. event ends
when the last set of people which has made such a claim in the course of the
event disperses. If new claims by 10 + people which would independently
qualify the event for inclusion arise in the course of the event, they keep the
event going.
A new action-phase begins when any formation begins a new action. At
least one phase must describe action before the event begins; when possible,
there should be one such unit for each formation present at the beginning of
the event. At least one phase must describe action after the event ends; when
possible, there should be one such unit from each formation which survived to
the end of the event.
If more than one formation changes action at the same time, we make a
phase unit for each formation and -assign each unH the same time.
286 Appendix 3
The minimum record contains at least one phase each: (1) before the event
begins; (2) at the beginning of the event; (3) in the course of the event; (4) at
the end of the event; (5) after the event.
Every formation named must appear in at least one action-phase.
Sequence number: first new phase at this time. Two digits; 00 = SOMETIME
Order number for multiple phases which start simultaneously: one digit
Date: year, month, day
Clock time: 2400 = midnight; 0000 = unknown
Relation to event: 1 = before event begins; 2 = action initiating event; 3 = in
course of event; 4 = adion ending event; 5 = after event ends
Formation number: 00 = someone (jf used, we must enumerate a SOMEONE
formation; 99 = all formations)
Action: alphabetic, including DK (definitely permits phrases such as
ATTEMPT TO .... ; in parentheses if our summary or inference, without
parentheses if dired transcription of words in account)
Object of action: alphabetic, including DK, NONE, FORMATION 23, etc.
Immediate consequences for object: alphabetic, including DK, NONE (con-
sequences occurring during same action-phase onlYi use after-event phases for
later consequences)
5. Source Section
One unH per source. In principle, there should be one source unit per cover
sheet and one cover sheet per source unit.
Name of source: alphabetic. Standard abbreviations for major sources
Location within source: information will vary with type of source. For news-
papers, for example, loeation will typically be date, page, location on page
Further identifying information: includes NONE. May eite headline, indicate
location in footnote, and so on.
Comments on source: alphabetic. Includes NONE. May mention quality,
contradiction of other sources, use made in coding.
6. Comment Section
One unit per comment. May be keyed to any location within EVENT, PLACE,
FORMATION, ACTION-PHASE, or SOURCE sections. In some cases, the
eodebook will require the coder who uses a certain code to make a
COMMENT.
Location in record: numerical code
Comment: alphabetic
Appenclix4
Malerials from Ihe
Sludy of eonlenlious
Galherings in
Greal Brilain
Provisional List of Contentious Gatherings in February 1828:
Type of ce Place Date Issue
meeting Weymouth 02-02 parliamentary election
meeting London 02-03 protection of victualler
trade
meeting Poultry 02-04 test corporation acts
meeting Edinburgh 02-04 petition king about
political favors
gathering Liverpool 02-05 election to parliament
gathering Durharn 02-05 local election
gathering Dover 02-06 election to parliament
violence London 02-06 crowd attaeks informer
parade * Weymouth 02-07 election
meeting Sheffield 02-07 vestry, ehureh rates
violence Newbury 02-07 crowd attacks informer
demonstration Weymouth 02-09 election
meeting Windsor 02-10 tax on carts
gathering-crowd Weymouth 02-11 election
gathering-mob London 02-13 threatens informer
gathering-crowd Durharn 02-13 county elections
meeting* London 02-15 licensed vs. nonlicensed
seilers
violence Atherstone 02-16 poaching affray
meeting Leicester 02-18 coin laws
gathering Weymouth 02-18 e1ection victory celebration
'" Reports for this event follow.
287
288 Appendix 4
meeting Mary-la-bonne 02-20 parish rates
violence Scarborough 02-28 smuggling affray
meeting Sheffield February test and corporation acts
(approx.)
meeting Islington February test and corporation acts
(approx.)
meeting London February test and corporation acts
(approx.)
meeting Honiton February test and corporation acts
(approx.)
meeting Dorchester February test and corporation acts
(approx.)
meeting Manchester February stamp duties
(approx.)
Materials From the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 289
I! 1IIIIIlJ
GREAT BRITAIN STIIDY COVERSHEET
Today'l'l d;ote 0/ - 0619i7
( )Schweitzer
(--nord ()Guest
( )!(elly ( )Sanchp.z
( )LONDON TIMES 3 co1umn 2 T ()Gray ()Stelo1art
page ( )Zizktl ( )Sloomingdale
(vJl.\ORNING CHRONICLE da.te 0:1; //-/87.8 day A? Rottom ( )Shore ( )Teixeira
( )Rurke ( )Peterson
Fst 11oe, ___ ________________________ _
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY (see memo (16)
(1) VIOLENCE ( )
property daroage ( ),
in,-'\l1ry ( ).
seiZUTe of property, spaces or perl'lo1ns ( ),
threat of a,ny of the ahove ( ).
(2)
(3-8)
MEETINGS ( )
( ) E1ection ( ) support fo, eTlRmy () go"""rnml'.nt
( ) Vel'lt.ry ( ) contr.al of JOCA.l
( ) Livet"y ( ) othf'cr aod d:l 8l'lFl,t;factions
( ) Dinner ( ) oppositinn ;:01 ot.hf'cl: IIp.opl,e>l.
"
groups
( ) PoliticAl elub 'party ( ) ohjeetives unc1e;;;.r
( ) with petition, address, etc. ( ) notiees, requests (for future meetings)
( ) opposition to government
( ) support for government
GATHERINGS
demonstrations (v{, parade
). rallies ( ),
other
( ) other (list)
), mobs (cirele one) (0.
special ee1ebrations ( ),
(9) DELEGATIONS, DEPUTATIONS ( )
(10) LABOR ACTIVITIES ( )
strike, turnout ( ), lockout ( ), ot' union mention ( ),
threll.ts to stop work ( ), work stoppages ( ), ret1lrn to 'Hork ( ),
deputatlons of workers ( ).
(11) LECAL ACrIONS ( )
an:-ef;t:s ( ), e)<<lminations ( ), tofo. ( ), aetions ( ),
sentenees, e;.:ecutions, ete, (). Be sure to check ".l'pro1D,iate areas above
that: pertain to the action that brought ahollt the arrest ,')'r
- - - - -' Tb - - -)54/;..2:-'- - _.- - - - - - - - - --
Participants rl<lE'AJds or /!JA. _____ . _____ _
Number "J..AR4G
co.J(ot.lR.Si: ..
Leaders fJ1A<
Date Ir/;. 07, )32.1
Yesterday, last week, a few days aga
Loeation "Ar
a
Speeifie plaee, inn, field, etc. vi11age or town/eity
COMMENTS ON BACK? ( ) 4-76, Rev. 4-77 Bobbi/CML
more
parish
county
290 Appendix 4
Materials From the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 291
1IIIIIIIll
GRRAT BRITAIN STuny COVERSHEET
Today's date 7 - er
(0schweitzer
()Lord ()Guest
19i I
( ) LONDON rums
CHRONICLE
( )Kelly ( )Sanchez
age I cOlumn" __ ()Gray ()Stewart
p ' __ .L___ * i dl ()Zizka ( )Bloomingdale
date ()d../1/8J'8 day, __ BO om ( )Shore ( }Teixeira
( )Burke ( )Peterson
First 11ne: __ tl!.. _ 3 __ :!'!!t:. __ _______________ _
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY (see memo 116)
(1) VIOLENCE ( )
property damage ( ),
personal injury ( ),
seizure of property, spaces or persons ( ),
threat of any of the ahove ( ).
(2)
(3-8)
MEETINGS (,.,{
( ) Election
( ) Vestry
( ) Livery
( ) Dinner
( ) Politieal
( ) with petition, etc.
( ) opposition to government
( ) support for government
GATHERINGS
( ) support for enemy of government
( y control of locsl government/institution
other grievances dissatisfactions
(vf opposition to other peoples or groups
( } objectives unclear
requests (for future meetings)
( ) other (list)
demonstrations (), parade (), assemblies, crowds. mobs (circle one) ( ),
gatherings (), railles (), special celebrations ( ),
other (list) _______ . __________________________________________________________ ___
(9) DELEGATIONS, DEPUTATIONS ( )
(10) LABOR ACTIVITIES \ )
strike, turnout ( ), lockout ( ), cOJllbination or union men-:-:'on ( ),
threats to stop work ( ), work stoppages ( ), return to ( ).
deputations of workers ( ).
(11) LEGAL ACnONS ( )
arrests ( ), e:lrami,n;,\tions ( ), pret!."ial info_ ( ). actions ( ),
sentences. exp.<:utiol1S, etc. ( ). Be sure to checl<;, the above
that pertain to the action that brought ahoat the 0-:-
Participants J... I (. U{C Tt..JA t(eR.S
Number 'Iv UM eR/){}5 " Leaders CMS.
Date, __ (if knOlID)
Yesterday, last week, a few days aga or less, a f'ew
Lo,",1on /.. Odofl1 7A. vel/}J /..d/'JaO;.t
Specific place, inn, field, etc. village or town/city
COMMENTS ON BACK? ( ) 4-76, Rev. 4-77 Bobbi/CML
days, more
parish
county
292 Appendix 4
GREAT BRITAIN STrmy
(0'LONDON TIMES
Materials From the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 293
COVERSHEET
Today' s date l - '22 19i I
( )Sc.hweitzer
()Lord
( )l\e11y ( )Sanchez
page, __ __ ,column, _-,3><-_-,TOP ()Gray ()Stewart
- - ( )Zizka ( )Bloomingdale
)MORNING CRRONICLE da,te 0;;' 'I/ '/j)'3 day t11 Bottom ( )Shore ( )Teixeira
( )Burke ( )Peterson
First Line: ____ _ 4- _ 11' ___________ _
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY (see memo 116)
(1) VIOI,ENCE ( )
property damage ( ),
per.Ror>Rl injury ( ),
seizure of property, spaces or pe,:<;nns ( ).
threat of any of thCl 8hov"l ( ).
(2)
(3-8)
MEETINGS ( )
( ) E1ection ( ) R\10port foe 0: ,:r."p.t'nrof>nt;
( ) Ve:::t.ry ( ) (',ontro1 of )N.l gw .
( ) Li.wn:y ( ) other gr:van,<,:p.s IF'(\ dj:::satisfactions
( ) Dlnnflr ( ) opposition to othP.:: pp.oolf'''l or groups
( ) Polit:i.c:al club/;>arty ( ) ohjectives ur>c:leRr
( ) with petition, "ddress, etc, ( ) notices, reqlJ.ests (for future meetings)
( ) opposition to g,overnment ( ) other (list)
( ) support foc government
GATHE.RINGS /
demonstrations (01'). parade (
gatherings (), rallies ( ),
), mobs (circle one) (0-
special ).
other (li5t) ____________________________________________________________ _
(9) DELEGATIONS, DEPUTArIONS ( )
(10) LAROR AC1'!VITH:S ( )
strjl(f!, tvrnout ( ),
thre<>,ts to stop work
deputIJ:ti.ons of workers
(11) LEGAL ( )
lockout ( ), cOl'1bination
). stoppages ( ),
( ).
0, unio'1 1Il8ntion ( ),
'Clturn to ( ),
a,rrest,s (). exami.na.tiOl'$ (). pt'p.t>:::iallr>-o. (), ;:,-i,:;is/cout't actions ( )
.9:entp.'1c:es. eXf>.cutions. ete.. (). Rp. sure to chPoc:k r',r ;!lr,nn."iate areas above
th;lf: pert;).in to thl': aC_Lion thil.t hrought aho'lt the ,,:':;:,;lst v-( .".';,,:.
A f)f) !lR5.5 1.AI(p ar
Participants, ___ __ _=a'_r __ _'A?=II:;,'_..;j=v:.i,,'_d=e::N' ______________ _
Number ______ _________________ _______________________________ _
Date 0;'" () 7 M /12 r known)'-:;;-;;:;;;;:--::::::::-___ _
Yesterday. last a few days ago less, a few days, more
Location Nf't- uJeyNlOtJ7Jh
narish
CO!1MENTS ON BACK? ( ) 4-76, Rev. 4-77 Bobbi/CML county
294 Appendix 4
Materials Frorn the Study 01 Contentious Gatherings in Great Britairz 295
Today's date 1- - /6
( )Sehweitzer
()Lord ()Guest
191/
GREAr BRITAIN STlIDY COVERSHEET
( ( )Sanchez
page 3 eolumn 3 (0Gray ()Stewart {v5'tONDON TlMES
'---=:'---' ( )Zizka ( )Bloomingdale
)MORNING C1{RONICLE date OQ2 '/1- /81'8' day!YJ Bottom ( )Shore ( )Ten;eua
, ( )BurKe ( )Peterson
Firot Line, ___ . .7j._ r + Led __ .i! ____________ _
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY (see memo #6)
(1) VIOLENCE ( )
property damage ( ),
pers(}f'lAl 10,1ury ( ).
seizllre of property, spAces or person" ( ).
threat of any of the ahovf:) ( ).
(2) MEETINGS ( )
( ) Election
( ) Vestry
( ) Livf:)ry
( ) Di,nner
( ) Politic:al club/party
( ) sUf'port fot' (lf ;:;<,werntnent
( ) control of )(l(:Al
( ) ather griflv,p,r.flS ;ann dj,ss>1tisfactions
( ) opposition to other peoples or groups
( ) ohjectives unclear
( ) with petition, address. etc.
( ) opposition to government
( ) notices. requests (for future
( ) (list), _____________ _
( ) support'for government
(3-8) GATHERINGS
gatherings (11.
), parade (
rallies ( ).
), cro'.,dB, mobs (drcle one) (..,;).
specia celebr.ations ( ).
other (list) __________________________ -c ________________________________ _
(9) DELEGATIONS. DEPUTATIONS ( )
(10) ACrIVITIES ( )
strikp., ( ), lockout ( ), eomhination 01." union mcn::iotl ( ).
threats t:o stop work ( ) > work stoppages ( ), return to <,Iork ( ),
deput;al:i.ons of workers ( ).
(11) LEGAL ACTIONS ( )
arrflf<t.s (), (,:J<aminatioTls (), .1<>1:'0. (), <:/eourt actions ( ).
exee:ut.ions. ete: _ ( ), Re to chp.r:k: tr.o;, ,;',')[,rr.,,:,,":L'lte above
th:>t Pf>.r.I:il,ln to the a<:t1.0n r.hllt hr.ought the
Ohjflcti"e of on __ __ _--",5, r.lJdl'l{ __ , ___ ,:
Participants_ FRle"d!>.,: APn eJf..J.l7'5
Nillnber __ -=L:,4"R=4"G__ .oC-::"c::"c:C"bc:""-I/:::S:::"::-_--'Leaders_.<I1&'":40:..____________ _
Date FA,JA, aQl. 0 8' (if kno'Nll) ::-:==-=::c-.----
less. a fe'" days, more
uJE'ymbOJ';{ ,
__
Spflcific place, ion, field. ete. or t()wn/city
COM,MENTS ON" BACK? (v(' "'-76, Rp.v. 4-77 Bobbi/CML
296 Appendix 4 Materials From the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 297
1IIIIIIIll
Today's date b 19/,
GRRAT BRll'AIN Sl'tIDY COVERSHEET
(vJSchweitzer
()Lord ()Guest
( }Kelly ( )Sanchez
(0LONDON TIMES page, __ __ __ TOP ()Gray ()Stewa,rt
- ( )Zizka ( hloomingdale
)MORNING CHRONICLE date OJ-/f'/32'8' day (YJ Bort:5m ( }Shore ( )l'eixeira
( }Hurke ( }Peterson
Fim Lin,, ___ 4-7 __ .8 _ _ _ __ LI2-?.<!]!/1!(> _________ _
GENERAL DESCRIPl'ION: CHECK AS MANY AS APPLY (see memo 116)
(1) VIOLENCE ( )
property darnage ( ).
pey.l'lonal in,iury ( ).
seizure of property, spaces or persons ( ),
threat of any of the ahove ( ).
(2) MEETINGS (..{
( ) Election
( ) Vestry
( ) SUPPDrt for .,nemy of governmen::
( ) control of local govP,.T:1ment!institution
(....; other griev<1f<ces M'd dLssa.thf.actions
(..-1oPPol'l"ltion to other peoples or groups
( ) L:i.very
( ) Dinner
( ) Political club/ ,:ctrty
( ) with petition, address, etc.
( ) opposition to government
( ) support for government
( ) o'bjeetives unc1ear
( ) notiees, requests (for future meetings)
( ) other (list)
(3-8) GATHERINGS
demonstrations ( ), parade ( ), assemblies , crowds. mobs (eirele one) ( ),
), rallies ( ), special celebrations ( ),
other
(9) DELEGATIONS, DEPUTATIONS ( )
(10) LABOR ACTIVITIES ( )
strike. turno\lt ( ), lockout ( ), cOlllbination
threats to stop work (), work stoppages ( ).
deputations of workers ( ).
or union
return to worl:, (
( ).
) .
(11) LEGAL AerIONS ( )
arrests ( ). examinations ( ). pret!;'ial info. ( ), actions ( ),
sentences, ('!xeeutions, etc. ( ). Be sure to cDeek the <:'.fl\-lrCl),i?tP- D,re.as above
thl'.t pertain to the a.ction that brought abollt the an:",st ')r tri,,::'.
57;; - - --7;1 - - _. - - - - --
Partic1pants LI ceN >Pd Vf(
Number "!JurneAtJ oJ ,5, " Leaders nLeAtJii;J
;;H",Ac;
/
::c:;-;-;:,O:,'J"O"I:::C>;:--.c
I
.:;!.=2,,1:::-c=-:-:=_D,uration (H known),-;;::::-:i=:-c=-=-___ _
Yesterday. last week, a few days aga one day or less, a few days, more
Date
Lo,atioo'-;;;:;:i.t.c,o;::""Jo,JE',;--;;;,(,;.::42:<!,-;e,;;'I<;=;'I-I;--:=_ _
Speeific place. inn, field, etc. --village or town!city parish
K
COMMENl'S ON BACK? ( ) 4-76, Rev. 4-77 Bohh:UCML county
298 Appendix 4
Materials Frorn the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 299
GREAT BRJTAIN STUDY
[vent Scction
Bobbi 5-77 Form 76-3
CODER
'-==-===-=:cJ
CA IDI! (9 digits) L:=-==-==--,,=-==_==-==,--==-==-
=t of Ev"nt
[] U::::Iro
SMTWTFSNA
Accuracy of starting date: Exact.
Date event ends: D Same as start.
Duration: Days NA 0 Answers
Type of event: 0 Violence 0 l1eeting
Major issue, 01.' claim: L-_____________________________________________________________ _
Location code lI's
Locatioll __ _
Scu"" , 0 MC D LT D GM 0 AR D HPD 0
Total participants: Low L-____
Best guess
HOl" determined: U Guess 0 fis in report DOther (list)
11 of person-davs: Estimate
of person-hours:
rlargin
I Hargin
! Hargin
Arrests during
Arrests after event:
,(.Jounde'd during event
Killed during evcnt:
}jarg.in
Nargin
cf
cf error
cf error
cf error
!
cf error +
cf error +
Assembler
Check coder. ,1 _____ 1 Date Punched L= __ ==----"
S"Ucu coded U A LJ B 11 C D 0 D, D FOG
Total number of formations enumerated cl ___ -.-JI (I of formations participating
in the evcnt C
For coder use on1:' L-____ _
300 Appendix 4
Coder 11 Lo======cJ
Total 11 of
formations
Nllmber of
this formation
Summary name fot
this formation
Does this formation overlap with any other forrnation(s) in the same event?
o No D Yes: lfuich ones? Give formations lfs 0 0
00
l.]hat is the relationsllip between this formation and the Contentious Gathering?
c==J Participants, making a claim
o Participants, object of a claim
L--J Participants, both making end receiving claims
LJ Spectator, bystander
U ___________________ -,
How?
c=JOther: L. _______________________________________________________ :==-__
Name(s) to this formation in account(s):
3L-__________________ -J
If the account(s) list any individual names of formation members, list them:
Dllone
9 I
,0IL ______________________ ,
Materials Frorn the Study 0/ Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 301
Individual names mentioned in aceount(s): (eontinued)
11.
12.
13_
14fi
15 _
The normal residence of this formation is:
16_
17,
18_
19_
20_ L-----_____________ -i
If more than 20 names. use another page.
c=J No information given, ean't glless residence.
[ ,-------------------
Specifie plaee
Parish County
LJ Other
l-------------------
Use parentheses if Inaking a guess.
Hords in account(s) describing and/or geographie extent of this formation:
NOM LJ
,-=---------------
J
3_ 1.
2_
4,
Do the accounts report a specific numbet (approximate or exact) for this formation?
o No
[J y" I
c=J Yes, multiple reports 1
302 Appendix 4
)'OUT e,;timates of the number of peopl" in this formation:
Low
High
Best guess L-________________________________________ --"
Impossible to judge c===J Source(s) of your best guess:
D Couldn' t guess DNumber
io text I
I
l_J Inferred How? I
Your estimate of lhe number of perso n-days in this forma tion:
,
YOUT estimate of the number of per so n-hours in this forma tion:
c::J
,
Souree of your estimate:
D Impossible to judge (must be 00,00 above)
[J N1,lmber in text
o Word(s) in text
o Inferred l1ow?
in text
I
00 - Impossible
to judge
01
,
ce less
than 1 da
00
'"
Impossible
tO j udge
1
,
CG less
than 1 hr.
r I Dates in text make it clear less than one day, NA exact amount of hours:
must be 01-00 above.
HOI-,. many mcmbers of this formation were:
Can't Basis of estimate:
li tell None In text Inferred ,-----------"-''''''------------------,
A"""" 0 D D D D
"o"od," [J D D D
Kill'd' D D 0 D
Any other word(s) in account(s) describing this
D
Materials Frorn the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 303
SOURCE SECTION
1, Name cf Sour ce
o [0
Locations: Date
Month Da, Year Page Cclumn
Top Middle Bottom Volume Number
(if needed)
Type cf Repcrt:
c=J Editorial/letter in news paper
c=J Advertisement er notice
c=J Eyewitness report
o Another newspaper's acccunt
[J Tl:ial (legal activity)
c=J Parliamentary repcrt
c=J Regular article
o Other
report
List
2. Name cf Souree
Lccations: Date
I I--.J I I
Mcnth Day Year Page Column
Top Middle Bottom Vclume Nurnber
(H needed)
Type of Report
Editorial/letter in newspaper c=J Trial (legal activity) report
Advertisement or notice o Parliamentary report
Eyewitness report o Regular article
Another newsDaper account Other
List List L-______________________
Additional materials that pertain to this event, specifically er i11 general.
u
u
Dissertation
o None
Diolone
304 Appendix 4
PLACE NAME SECTION: Fi11 out one section for each place an action occurs.
1. Principal place
List parish first,
then county.
Detailed place
2. Principal place
List parish first,
then county.
Detailed place
3. Principal place
List parish first
then county.
Detailed place
4. Principal place
List parish first
then county.
Detailed pLace
5. Principal place
List parish first
then county.
Detailed place
6. Principal place
Li.st pari.sh first
then county.
Detailed place
A)
- _._.
B)
A)
B)
A)
- - _ ._"
B)
A)
-- -
B)
A)
B)
A)
B)
Materials From the Study of Contentious Gatherings in Great Britain 305
GBS!CGC
F. COMMENT SECTICN (use one square per!comment only)
1) Location, section letter Hern 1,__ _
2) Location, section letter item 11__ _
3) Location, section letter itemll __ _
306 Appendix 4
GUS/CGC
G. CODING INFO.
1) Name of coder; 2) Coder numberj
3) Date coded;
4) General notes on coding of this event;
5) Check coder name; ___ __ ____ 6) Check coder number; ____ _
7) General notes on check codingj
Bibliography
The bib!iography falls into eight seetions, corresponding to the book's eight
chapters. In each seetion you will find the references cited in the chapter, some
background material and a few examples of further work along the same !ines.
1 Introduction
CARDEN, MAREN LOCKWOOD (1974). The New Feminist New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
CLARK, SAMUEL D.; j. PAUL GRAYSON; and LINDA M. GRAYSON, eds. (1975).
Prophecy and Protest: Sodal Movements in Twentieth-Century Canada.
Toronto: Gage.
COLEMAN. jAMES S. (1973). The Mathematics of Collective Action. Chicago; Aldine.
FEUER. LEWIS S. (1969). The Conflict of Generations: The Character and Significance
of Student Movements. New York: Basic Books.
HUME, DAVID (1875). Essays. Moral, Political and Literary. 2 vols. London:
Longmans, Green. Originally published in 1740.
KLAPP, ORRIN E. (1969). Collective Search for Identity. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston.
KRIESBERG, LOUIS (1973). The Sociology of Social Conflict. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey; Prentice-Hall.
KUCZYNSKI. jRGEN (1967). The Rise of the Working Class. New York: McGraw-
Hili.
LANDSBERGER, HENRY A., ed. (1974). Rural Protest: Peasant Movements and Sodal
Change. London: Macmillan.
UPSET, SEYMOUR MARTIN (1970). Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Change and
Persistence in Sodal Structures. Rev. ed. Garden City, New York: Doubleday
Anchor.
307
308 BibIiography
MACPHERSON, C. B. (1962), The Politieal Theory of Possessive Individualism,
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MANN, MICHAEL (1973). Consciousness and Action among the Western Working
Class. London: Macmillan.
MHLMANN, WILHELM E. (1961). Chiliasmus und Nativismus. Berlin, Dietrich
Reimer.
NORDLlNGER, ERIC A. (1972). Confliet Regulation in Divided Societies. Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Center for International Affalrs. OccaslOnal
Papers in International Affairs 29.
OHNGREN BO (1974). Folk i rre/se. Samhllsutveekling, flyttningsmnster och
fOlkrarelser i Eskilstuna 1870-1900. Uppsala, Sweden, Almqvist & WikselL
Studia Historica Upsaliensia 55.
PEREIRA DE QUEIROZ, MARIA ISAURA (1968). Reforme et revolution dans les soeietes
traditionnelles. Historie et ethnologie des mouvements messianiques. Pans:
Anthropos,
PICKVANCE, C. G. (1975). "On the Study of Urban Sodal Movements," Soeiologieal
Review 23,29-49.
RANULF, SVEND (1964). Moral Indignation and Middle Class Psychology. New York,
Schocken, First published in 1938.
NATIO
NAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CIVIL DISORDERS (1968). Report.
f II as "The
Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office. Known in orma y
Kerner Report."
RICHARDSON, LEWIS F. (1960). Statisties of Deadly Quarre/s, Pittsburgh, Boxwood
Press.
RlDKER, RONALD (1962). "Discontent and Economic Growth." Economic Develop-
ment and Cultural Change 10, 1-15.
ROSENAU, jAMES N., ed. (1964). International Aspects of Civil Strife, Prineeton,
Princeton University Press.
SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL (1976). Radical Protest and Social Structure. New York,
Academic Press.
SHARP, GENE (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Boston: Porter Sargent.
SMITH, ADAM (1910). The Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. London, J. M. Dent. First
published in 1776; many editions.
SPIELBERG, jOSEPH, and SCOTT WHITEFORD, eds. (1976). Forging Nation" A Com-
parative View of Rural Ferment and Revolt. East Lansing: Michigan State Umver-
sity Press.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1971). "The Moral Econorny of the English Crowd in the
Eighteenth Century." Past and Present 50: 76-136.
TILL Y, CHARLES (1974). "Do Comrnunities Aet?" Sociological Inquiry 43, 209-240.
Bibliography 309
TILLY, RICHARD (1970). "Popular Disorders in Nineteenth Century Germany: A
liminary Survey." Journal of Soda] History 4: 1-40.
WALLACE, ANTHONY F. c. (1956). "Revitalization Movements." American
pologis! 58, 264-281.
WEBB, SlDNEY, and BEATRICE WEBB (1963). English Poor Law Library. Part 1: The
Old Poor Law. Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books. Volume I of English Local
Government. First Published in 1927.
2 Theories and Descriptions of Collective Action
ALBERONI, FRANCESCO (1968). Statu nascenti. Studi sui processi colletivi. Bologna:
Il Mulino.
ALLAN, GRAHAM (1974),"A Theory of Millennialisrn, The Irvingite Movernent as an
Illustration." The British Journal of Sociology 25,296-311.
ANDERSON, B (1968). "Revitalization Movements: An Essay on Structure and IdeoM
logy in a Class of Exclusive Underdog Systems." Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis
17,347-375.
ARROW, KENNETH j. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. 2d. ed. New York.
Wiley, .
ASH, ROBERTA (1972). Sodal Movements in America. Chicago: Markham,
ASHENFELTER, ORLEY, and GEORGE E. jOHNSON (1969), "Bargaining Theory, Trade
Unions and Industrial Strike Activity." American Economic Review 59: 35-49.
BANKS, J. A. (1970). Marxist Sodology in Action. A Sodological Critique of the
Marxist Approach to Industrial Relations. London: Faber & FabeL
BERK, RICHARD A. (1974). "A Garning Approach to Crowd Behavior." Ameriean
Sodological Review 39: 355-373.
BOULDING, KENNETH E. (1962). Conflict and Defense, A General Theory. New York,
Harper & Row.
BRETON, A., and R. BRETON (1969). "An Economic Theory of Social.Movements."
American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 59: 198-205.
BUCHANAN, jAMES M., and GORDON TULLOCK (1962). The Calculus of Consent.
Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
CHEVALIER, LOUIS (1958), Classes laborieuses et dasses dangereuses Cl Paris pendant
ta premiere du XIXe siede. Paris: PIon.
COBB, RICHARD (1961-63). Les armees revolutionnaires, instrument de Ja Terreur
dans les departements. 2 vols. Paris: Mouton.
--- (1964). Terreuretsubsistances, 1793-1795. Paris: Clavreuil.
-- (1970). The Police and the People. Freneh Popular Protest, 1789-1820.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
310 Bibliography
COLEMAN, lAMES S, (1973), The Mathematies of Collective Action. Chicago, Aldine.
__ (1974). Powerand the Structure of Society. New York: W. W. Norton.
COOPER MARK N. (1974). "A Reinterpretation of the Causes of Turmoi!' The Effects
of Culture and Modernity." Comparative PoHtical Studies 7: 267-291.
DAUMARD, ADELlNE (1963). La bourgeoisie parisienne de 1815 a 1848. Paris:
SEVPEN.
DUNCAN, GRAEME (1973). Marx and Mill. Two Views of Social Conflict and Social
Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DURHAM, WILLlAM H. (1976). "Resource Competition Human Aggression, Part
I: A Review of Primitive War." Quarterly Review of BlOlogy 51: 385-415.
DURKHEIM, EMILE (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York, Macmillan.
__ (1951). Suicide. A Study in Sociology. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
___ (1961). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York, Collier Books.
FELDMAN, ALLAN, and ALAN KIRMAN (1974). "Fairness and Envy." Amerimn
Economic Review 59: 995-1005.
FIREMAN, BRUCE, and WILLIAM A. GAMSON (1977). "Utilitarian Logic in the Resource
Mobilization Perspective." Working Paper 153, Center for Research on Soclal Or-
ganization, University of Michigan.
FlSHBURN, PETER (1973). Mathematies of Decision Theory. The Hagu", Mouton.
FOSTER, lOHN (1974). Class Struggle and the [ndustrial Revolution. Early [ndustrial
Capitalism in Three Towns. London: Weidenfeld & Nlcolson.
FROLICH NORMAN, lOE A. OPPENHEIMER, and OR1).N R. YOUNG (1971). Politieal
Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Prineeton University Press.
FROLICH, NORMAN et a1. (1975). "Individual Contributions for Collective Goods."
Journal of Confliet Resolution 19, 310-329.
FURET, FRANC;0IS (1963). "Pour une .classes a l'epoque
moderne." Annales; Economies, Societes, ClVzllsatlOns 18: 459-474.
FURET, FRAN<;:OIS, CLAUDE MAZAURIC, and LOUIS BERGERON .. "Les sans-
euIottes et la Revolution franc;aise." Annales; Economies, Socretes, CWlhsatwns
18,1098-1127.
GOSSEZ, REMI (1967). Les Ouvriers de Paris. I. L'Organisation, 1848-1851, La Roche-
sur-Yon: Imprimerie Centrale de rOuest.
GURR TED ROBERT (1968). "A Causal Model of Civil Strife, A Comparative Analysis
USing New Indices." American PoliticaI Science Review 62:1104-1124.
__ (1969). Why Men Rebe!. Princeton: Prineeton University Press.
GURR, TED ROBERT, and RAYMOND DUVALL (1973). "Civil Conflict the 19605' A
Redproeal System with Parameter Estimates." Comparative Polltlcal Studles 6:
135-169.
Bibliography 311
GUSFIELD, jOSEPH R. (1966), Symbolie Crusade. Status Polities and the Ameriean
Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of IlIinois Press.
HAUSER, PHILIP (1963). "The Sociat Eeonomic and Technologieal Problems of Rapid
Urbanization," in Bert Hoselitz and Wilbert Moore, eds., Industrialization and
Soeiety, The Hagu", Mouton for UNESCO.
HIBBS, DOUGLAS A., jR. (1973). Mass Politieal Violen ce. A Cross-National Causa I
Analysis. New York, Wiley.
HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT O. (1970). Exit, Voiee and Loyalty, Responses to Decline in
Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
,
HOBSBAWM, E, j., and GEORGE RUDE (1969). Captain Swing, London, Lawrenee &
Wishart.
HOLSTI, K. j. (1975), "Underdevelopment and the 'Gap' Theories of International
Conflict." American PoliticaI Science Review 69: 827-839.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven,
Yale University Press.
jOHNSON, CHALMERS (1966). Revolutionary Change. Boston, Little, Brown,
KRAMER, GERALD H., and jOSEPH E. HERTZBERG (1975), "Formal Theory," in voL 7
of Fred 1. Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook oi Political Science.
Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
LEFEBVRE, GEORGES (1924), Les paysans du Nord pendant la Revolution fran,aise,
Lille: Robbe.
--- (1962-63). Etudes orJeanaises. 2 vols. Paris: Commission d'Histoire
Eeonomique et Sodale de la Revolution.
LOWY, MICHEL (1970). La theorie de Ia rJvolution chez le ieune Marx. Paris:
Maspero.
MARX, GARY T., and jAMES L. WOOD (1975), "Strands of Theory and Research in
Collective Behavior." Annual Review of Sociology, 1. Beverly Hills, California:
Sage.
MARX, KARL (1935), The Civil Wars in Franee. New York, International Publishers,
--- (1958), 'The CIa5s Struggles in Franee, 1848-1850" and "The Eighteenth
Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte" in Kar! Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected
Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
McCARTHY, JOHN D., and MAYER N. ZALD (1973). The Trend of SocialMovements in
America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, New
Jersey: General Learning Corporation.
McPHAIL, CLARK (1971). "CiviI Disorder Participation: A Critical Examination of
Recent Research." American Sociological Review 36: 1058-1073.
MILL, JOHN STUART (1950), Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Repressive Government.
London, J, M, Dent.
312 Bibliography
MOORE, BARRINGTON, jR. (1966), SodalOrigins of Dietatorship and Democracy.
Boston: Beacon.
NAMIER. LEWIS (1961). The Structure of Politics at the Acces5ion of George 111. 2d.
ed. London: Macmillan.
NELSON, JOAN (1970). "The Urban Poor: Disruption or Political Integration in Third
World Cities1" World Politics 22: 393-414.
OBERSCHALL, ANTHONY (1973), Sodal Confliet and Social Movements. Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentiee-Hall.
O'BRIEN, DAVID j. (1974). "The Publie Goods Dilemma and the 'Apathy' 01 the Poor
Toward Neighborhood Organization." Sodal Service Review 48: 229-244.
OLSON, MANCUR, jR. (1965). The Logic of Colleetive Aetion. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
PARSONS, TALCOTT (1960). "Durkheim's Contribution to the Theory 01 Integration
of Sodal Systems," in Kurt H. WolH, ed., Essays on Sodology and Philosophy.
New York: Harper & Row.
PLAMENATZ, JOHN (1949). Mill's Utilitarianism, reprinted with a study of the English
Utilitarians. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
PRICE, ROGER (1972). The French Second Republic. A Social History. London: B. T.
Batsford.
PRZEWORSKI, ADAM (1975). "Institutionalization of Voting Patterns, or ls Mobiliza-
tion the Source of Decay?" American Political Seien ce Review 69: 49-67.
RIKER, WILLIAM H .. and PETER C. ORDESHOOK (1968). "A Theory 01 the Calculus 01
Voting./I American Political Science Review 62: 25-42.
RUDI;' GEORGE (1959). The Crowd in the French Revolution. Oxlord: Oxlord Univer-
sity Press.
__ (1964). The Crowd in History. A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and
England, 1730-1848. NewYork: Wiley.
RUMMEL. RUDOLPH j. (1966). "Dimensions 01 Conflict Behavior Within Nations."
Journal of Confliet Resolution 10: 65-74.
SCOTT, MARVIN B., and STANFORD M. LYMAN (1970). The Revolt of the Students.
Columbus, Ohio: CharIes E. Merrill.
SHILS, EDWARD (1962). Political Development in the New States. The Hague:
Mouton.
SOBOUL, ALBERT (1958). Les sans-culottes parisiens en l'an 1J. La Roche-sur-Yon:
Po tier .
TAYLOR, MICHAEL (1975). "The Theory 01 Colleetive Choice," in vol. 3 01 Fred L
Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science. Reading,
Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Cla55. London:
Gollancz.
Bibliography 313
T\1'NNESSON, KARE (1959), La defaite des sans-culottes. Paris: Clavreuil.
TURNER, RALPH H. (1967). "Types 01 Solidarity in the Reconstituting 01 Groups,"
Pacific Sodological Review 10: 60-68.
USEEM, MICHAEL (1973). Conscription, Protest, and Social Confliet. The Life and
Death of a Draft Resistance Movement. New York: WiIey.
___ (1975). Protest Movements in America, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
VON NEUMANN, JOHN, AND OSKAR MORGENSTERN (1947). Theory of Games and
Economic Behavior. 2d. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
WEBER, MAX (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5th ed. TUbingen, Gerrnany: J. C.
B. Mohr. (English translation: Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, eds., Economy
and Sodety. 3 vols. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968.)
WELLER, JACK M" and E.L. QUARANTELLI (1973). "Negleeted Characteristics 01 Col-
lective Behavior./I American Journal of Sociology 79: 665-685.
WHITE, LOUISE (1976), "Rational Theories 01 Participation," Journal of Conflict
Resolution 20: 255-278.
WILKINSON, PAUL (1971). Social Movement. London: Pall Mall.
WILSON, KENNETH L., and ANTHONY ORUM (1976). "Mobilizing Peop!e 10r Collee-
tive Political Action./I Journal of Political and Military Sodology 4: 187-202.
WOLF, ERIC (1969), Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper &
Row.
3 Interests, Organization and Mobilization
AGULHON, MAURICE (1966). La sociahilite meridionale. 2 vols. Aix-en-Provence: La
Pensee Universitaire.
ALAPURO, RISTO (1976). "On the Political Mobilization 01 the Agrarian Population
In Fmland: Problems and Hypotheses." Scandinavian Political Studies 11: 51-76.
AMINZADE, RONALD (1973), "Revolution and Collective Politiea! The Case
01 the Working Class 01 Marseille, Franee, 1830-1871." Working Paper 86,
Center for Research on Sodal Organization, University of Michigan.
CAMERON, DA VID R. (1974). "T oward a Theory 01 Political Mobilization." Journal of
Politics 36: 138-171,
COHN, NORMAN (1957). The Pursuit of the Millennium. Fairlawn, New Jersey: Essen-
tial Books.
DAHL, ROBERT A. (1966). "The American Oppositions: Affirmation and Denial," in
Robert A. DahI, ed., Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven:
Yale University Press. Cited frorn paperback edition.
DEUTSCH, KARL (1953). Nationalism and Social Communication. Carilbridge: MIT
Press.
DOWE, DIETER (1970). Aktion und Organisation. Arbeiterbewegung, sozialistische
314 Bibliography
und kommunistische BetVegung in der preussischen Rheinprovinz 1820-1852.
Hannover: Verlag fr Literatur und Zeitgeschehen.
EDMONSON, MUNRO S. (1958). Status Terminology and the Sodal Structure of North
American Indians. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
ETZIONI, AMITAl (1968). The Active Sodety, New York, Free Press.
FlAZ, MUHAMMAD (1973), lnterindustry Propensity to Strike in France, 1891 to 1930.
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sodology, University of Toronto.
FlREMAN, BRUCE et a1. (1976). "Catalyzing Rebellion, An lntroduction to the
Mobilization in Miniature Project." Working Paper 138, Center for Research on
Sodal Organization, University of Michigan.
GAMSON, WILLIAM A. (1968a). Power and Discontent. Homewood, Illinoi" Dorsey.
___ (1968b). "Stable Unrepresentation in American Sodety." American
Behavioral Sdentist 12: 15-21.
___ (1975). The Strategy of Soda! Protest. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.
GESCHWENDER, BARBARA A., and jAMES A. GESCHWENDER (1973), "Relative
Deprivation and Participation in the Civil Rights Movement." Social Sdence
Quarterly 54, 403-411.
GURR, TED ROBERT (1969). Why Men Rebe!. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HANAGAN, MICHAEL (1976). "The Logic of Solidarity' Sodal Structure in a French
Town/' Journal of Urban History, forthcoming.
HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Responses to Decline in
Finns, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
jACOBSON, ALVIN (1973). "Some Theoretieal and Methodologieal Considerations for
Measuring Intrasodetal Conflict." SocioJogical Methods and Research 1:
439-461.
KANTER, ROSABETH MOSS (1972). Commitment and Community. Communes and
Utopias in Sodological Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
KERR, CLARK, and ABRAHAM SIEGEL (1954). "The Inter-Industry Propensity to
Strike," in Arthur Kornhauser et al., Industrial Conflict. New York: Wiley.
KORNHAUSER, WILLlAM (1959). The PolWcs of Mass Sodety. GIeneoe, lllinois, Free
Press.
KRIEGEL, ANNIE (1966). La Croissance de la C. G, T., 1918-1921, Essai Stalistique.
Paris: Mouton.
KUHNLE, STEIN (1973). Sodal Mobilization and Political Partidpation, The Nordic
Countries, c. 1850-1870. Bergen: Institute of Sociology.
LAUMANN, EDWARD 0., and FRANZ U. PAPPI (1976). Networks of Collective Action.
A Perspective on Community lnfluence Systems. New York: Acadernic.
LEGGETT, JOHN C. (1968). Class, Race, and Labor: Working-Class Consdousness in
Detroit. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bibliography 315
LIND, jOAN (1973). Foreign and Domestie Confliet, The British and Swedish Labor
Movements, 1900-1950. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sociology, University
of Michigan.
--- (1974). "Political Power and Collective Action: British and Swedish Labor
Movements, 1900-1950." Working Paper 100, Center for Research on Sodal
Organization University of Michigan.
LIPSET, S. M.; MARTIN TROW; and jAMES S. COLEMAN (1956). Union Democracy.
Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
MACPHERSON, C. B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive lndividualism. Ox-
ford: Clarendon Press.
MAID<, KARL (1973). Surveys from Exile. Political Writings, Vol. 2. London, Allen
Lane.
McPHAIL, CLARK, ,nd DAVID L. MILLER (1973). "The Assembling Process. A
Theoretical and EmpiricaI Examination." American Sodological Review 38:
721-735,
MICHELS, ROBERT (1949). Polilical Parties. Glencoe, lllinoi" Free Press. First
published in 1915.
MORGAN, WILLlAM R .. and TERRY NICHOLS CLARK (1973). "The Causes of Radal
Disorders: A Grievance-Level Explanation." American Sodological Review 38:
611-624.
NETTL, j. P. (1967). Politieal Mobilization. A Sodological Analysis.of Methods and
Concepts. London: Faber & Faber.
OBERSCHALL, ANTHONY (1973). Sodal Conflict and Sodal Movements. Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentiee-Hall.
OLSON, MANCUR, jR. (1965). The Logic of Colleetive Action. Cambridgeo Harvard
University Press.
PROST, ANTOINE (1964). La C. G. T. a l'epoque du Front Populaire, 1934-1939, Essai
de description numerique. Paris: Colin.
ROY, WILLIAM (1977). Inter-industry Vesting of Interests in aNational Polity Over
Time: The United States, 1886-1905. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in
Sociology, University of Michigan.
SEWELL, WILLIAM (1971). "La classe o u v r ~ r de Marseille sous la Seconde Republi-
que. Structure sodale et comportement politique." Le Mouvement Sodal 76:
27-66.
SHORTER, EDWARD, and CHARLES TILLY (1974). Strikes in France, 1830-1968.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SMITH, ADAM (1910). The Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. London, J. M, Dent.
SNYDER, DAVlD (1974). Determinants of Industrial Confliet, Historieal Models of
Strikes in France, Italy and the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in
sociology, University ofMichigan.
316 Bibliography
SNYDER, DAVID, and WILLlAM R. KELLY (1976). "Industrial VioIence in Italy,
1878-1903." Ameriean Journal of Sociology 82,131-162.
SOROKIN, PITIRIM A. (1962). Social and Cultural Dynamies. IlI. Fluetuation of Social
Relationships, War and Revolution. New York: Bedminster,
SUGIMOTO, YOSHIO (1973). Equalization and Turbulence, The Case of the American
Occupation of Japan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sociology, University of
Pittsburgh.
TAYLOR, CHARLES LEWIS (1966). Toward an Explanation of the Rise of Political
Activity among English Working Men, 1790-1850. Unpublished paper presented
to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,
TILLY, CHARLES, LOUISE TILLY, and RICHARD TILLY (1975). The Rebellious Century,
1830-1930, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
UHEN, LEO (1964), Gruppenbewusstsein und informelle Gruppenbildungen bei deut-
schen Arbeitern im Jahrhundert der Industrialisierung. Berlin: Duncker & Hum-
blot.
VERDERY, KATHERINE (1976). "Ethnicity and Local System" The Religious Organiza-
Hons of Welshness," in Carol A. Smith, ed., Regional Analysis. Volume II: Sodal
Systems. New York: Academic,
VOLKMANN, HEINRICH (1975). Die Krise von 1830, Form, Ursache and Funktion des
soziales Protests im deutschen Vormrz. Unpublished Habilitationsthesis, Free
University of Berlin.
WHITE, HARRISON (n.d.). Notes on the Constituents of Social Structure. Unpublished
paper, Harvard University.
WOLF, ERIC (1969). Peasant Wars of tlle Twentieth Century. New York Harper &
Row.
YOUNG, FRANK W. (1966), "A Proposal for Cooperative Cross-Cultural Research on
Intervillage Systems." Human Organization 25: 46-50.
ZWAHR, HARTMUT (1976). "Zur Strukturanalyse der sich konstituierenden deutschen
Arbeiterklasse." Beitrge zur Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung 4: 605-628.
4 The Opportunity to Act Together
BAiLEY, F. G. (1969). Stratagerns and Spoils. Oxford, Blackwell.
BALBUS, ISAAC D. (1971). "The Concept of Interest in Pluralist and Marxist
Analysis." Politics and Society 1: 151-177.
BEATTIE, j. M. (1974). "The Pattern of Crime in England, 1660-1800." Past and
Present 62,47-95.
BOISSEVAIN, jEREMY (1976). Of Men and Marbles, Factionalism Reconsidered.
Unpublished paper, Study Group, University of
Amsterdam.
BONNEFOUS, GEORGES (1956). Histoire politique de la Troisieme Republique. Vol. I.
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bibliography 317
BRILL, HARRY (1971). Why Organizers Fail. The Story of a Rent Strike. Berkeley,
University of California Press,
CHAPMAN, BRIAN (1970). Police State. London, Pali Mall.
CHAZEL, FRAN<;OIS (1974). "Pouvoir, cause et force." Revue fram;aise de sodologie
15,441-457.
CONNOLLY, WILLIAM E. (1972). "On 'Interests' in Politics." Politics and Society 2
459-477. .
DAVIES, jAMES c. (1962). "Toward a Theory of Revolution." American Sociological
Revzew27,5-19.
--- (1969). "The J-Curve of Rising and Declining Satisfactions as a Cause of Some
Great Revolutions and a Contained Rebellion," in Hugh Davis Graham and Ted
Robert Gurr, eds., Violence in America. Washington: U.S, Govemment Printing
Office.
FENNO, RICHARD F., jR. (1966). The Power of the Purse. Boston, Little, Brown.
GAMSON, WILLlAM A. (1968). Power and Discontent. Homewood, Illinois, Dorsey.
____ (1975). The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, Illinoi" Dorsey.
GROH, DIETER (1973). Negative Integration und revolutionHrer Attentismus. Die
deutsche Sozialdemokratie am Vorabend des erstes Weltkrieges. Frankfurt alM
Ullstein. .
GOULD, JOHN P. (1973). "The Economics of Legal Conflicts." Journal of Legal Studies
2,279-300.
HAY, DOUGLAS (1?75). "Property, Authority and the Criminal Law," in Douglas Hay
et al., Albion 5 Fatal Tree, Crime and Sodety in Eighteenth-Centu.ry England,
New York: Pantheon.
HEIRICH, MAX (1971). The Spiral of Conflict, Berkeley, 1964. New York, Columbia
University Press.
HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Responses to Decline in
Firms, Organizations, and States. Carnbridge: Harvard University Press.
jENKINS, CRAIG, and CHARLES PERROW (1974). Protest and Powe" Farm Worker
lnsurgency (1945-1972). Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology State
University of New York, Stony Brock. '
LAPONCE, jEAN (1969). "Canadian Party Labels, An Essay in Semantics and Anthro-
pology." Canadian Journal of Political Science 2: 141-157.
LAURIE, BRUCE G. (1973). "Fire Companies and Gangs in Southwark, The 1840s " in
Allen F: Davis and Mark H. Haller, eds., The Peoples of Philadelphia. A
of Ethnzc Groups and Lower-Class Life, 1790-1940. Philadelphia, Temple Univer-
sIty Press.
LEITES, NATHAN, and CHARLES WOLF, jR. (1970). Rebellion and Authority. An
Analytlc Essay on Insurgent Conflicts. Chicago: Markham.
LEVETT, ALLAN (1974). Centralization of City Police in the Nineteenth Century
318
United States. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sociology, University of Michi-
gan.
LlPSKY, MICHAEL (1970). Protest in City Politie" Rent Strikes, Housing and the
Power of the Poor. Chieago, Rand MeNally.
LOWI, THEODORE (1971). The Polities of Disorder. New York, Basic.
LUKES, STEVEN (1974). Powe" A Radieal View. London, Maemillan.
MAYHEW, ANNE (1972). "A Reappraisal of the Causes of Farm Protest in the Uni ted
States, 1870-1900." Journal of Eeonomie History 32, 464-475.
MILIBAND, RALPH (1969). The State in Capitalist Soeiety. London, Weidenfeld &
Nicolson.
NAGEL, lACK H. (1975). The Deseriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven, Yale Uni-
versity Press.
O'DONNEL, GUILLERMO A. (1972). Modernizadon y autoritarismo. Buenos Aires:
Paidos.
PAYNE, JAMES L. (1965). Labor and Politics in Peru. New Haven: Yale University
Press.
PEARSON, IEFF (1970). On Watehing the State and Contenders in a Parliamentary
Context. Unpublished paper, Center for Research on Social Organization,
University of Michigan.
PENNINGS, IOHANNES M. (1975). 'The Relevanee of the Struetural-Contingeney
Model for Organizational Effectiveness." Administrative Science Quarterly 20:
393-410.
PENROSE, L. s. (1952). The Objective Study of Crowd Behavior. London, Lewis.
PERROW. CHARLES (1967). "A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Orga-
nizations." American Sodological Review 32: 194-208.
RADZINOWICZ, LEON (1968). A History of English Criminal Law and its Administra-
tion from 1750. IV: Grappling for Control. London: Stevens.
ROY, WILLIAM G. (1975). "Integration of a National Business Elite, The U.S.
1890-1905." Working Paper 120, Center for Research on Sodal Organization,
University of Michigan.
RUDE, GEORGE (1973). "Protest and Punishment in Nineteenth-Century Britain."
Albion 5,1-23.
RUSSETT, BRUCE M. (1964). "Inequality and Instability, The Relation of Land Tenure
to Polities." World Polities 160442-454.
SAMAHA, JOEL (1974). Law and Order in Historical Perspective. New York:
Academic.
SHELTON, WALTER j. (1973). English Hunger and [ndustrial Disorders. A Study of
Sodal Conflict during the First Decade of George IIl's Reign. London: Macmillan.
SIMON, HERBERT (1957). "Notes on the Observation and Measurement of Political
Power," in Models of Man, Sodal and Rational. New York: Wiley.
Bibliography 319
SPIELMAN, JOHN V. (1939). "Labor Disputes on Rights and lnterests." Amedcan
Economic Review 29: 299-312.
STINCHCOMBE, ARTHUR (1965). "Social Structure and Organizations," in iames
March, ed., Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, Rand MeNally.
-- (1974). Creating Effident IndustrialAdministrations. NewYork: Academic.
-- (1975). "Sodal Structure and PoHtics," in vol. 3 of Fred I. Greenstein and Nel-
son Polsby, eds., Handbook of Politiml Seience. Reading, Massachusetts, Addi-
son-Wesley.
STORCH, ROBERT D. (1976). "The Polieeman as Domestic Missionary, Urban Disci-
plme and Popular Culture in Northern England, 1850-1880." Journal of Soeial
History 9, 481-509.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1975). Whigs and Hunters. The Origin of the Black Act. New
York, Pantheon.
TILLY, CHARLES, ALLAN LEVETT, A. Q. LODHI, and FRANK MUNGER (1975). "How
Pohcmg Affected the Visibility of Crime in Nineteenth-Century Europe and
America." Working Paper 115, Center for Research on Sodal Organization,
University of Michigan.
TUDESQ, ANDRE-IEAN (1964). Les Grands Notables en France. Pari" Presses
Universitaires de France.
WICKBERG, EDGAR (1975). "The Taiwan. Peasant Movement, 1923-1932, Chinese
Rural Radicalism under ]apanese Development Programs." Pacific Affairs 48:
558-582.
WILSON, jAMES Q. (1973). Politieal Organizations. New York, Basic.
WOLF, ERIC (1969). Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York, Harper &
Row.
YUCHTMAN, EPHRAIM, and STANLEY E. SEASHORE (1967). "A System Resouree
Approach to Organizational Effectiveness." American Sociological Review 32:
891-903.
5 Changing Forms oE Collective Action
ACCATI, L. (1972). "Vive le roi sans taille et sans gabelle: una discussione sulle rivolte
eontadine." Quaderni Stodei 7, 107l-1104.
AGUET, lEAN-PIERRE (1954). Contribution a l'histoire du mouvement ouvrier
fram;ais, Ies greves sous la Monarchie de JuWet (1830-1847). Genev", Droz.
AGULHON, MAURICE (1970). La Republique au village. Paris, PIon.
ALAPURO, RISTO (1974). "Peasants, States and the Capitalist World System, A
Review." Working Paper 103, Center for Research on Social Organization
University of Michigan. '
AMINZADE, RONALD (1976). "Breaking the Chains of Dependency, From Patronage
to Class Politics." Journal of Urban History, forthcoming.
320 Bibliography
AMSDEN, JON, and STEPHEN BRIER (1977). "Coal Miners on Strike: The Transforma-
tions of Strike Demands and the Formation of a National Union." Journal of
Interdisciplinary History 7: 583-616.
ASHENFELTER, ORLEY. and GEORGE E. jOHNSON (1969). "Bargaining Theory, Trade
Unions and Industrial Strike Activity." American Economic Review 59:35-49.
BENDlX, REINHARD (1964). Nation-Bui/ding and Citizenship. New York: Wiley.
BERcE, YVES-MARIE (1974). Histoire des Croquants. 2 vols. Paris: Droz.
BLACK, EUGENE C (1963). The Association. British Extraparliamentary Political
Organization, 1769-1793. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
BLOK, ANTON (1974). The Mafia of a Sicilian Village. New York: Harper & Row.
BRlTT, DAVlD, and OMER GALLE (1972). "Industrial Conflict and Unionization."
American Sociological Review 37: 46-57.
__ (1974). "Structural Antecedents of the Shape of Strikes: A Comparative
Analysis." American SociologicaI Review 39: 642-651.
CARTER, APRIL (1973). Direcl Action and Liberal Democracy. London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
CAVALLl, ALESSANDRO, and ALBERTO MARTINELLl (1971).11 campus diviso. Padua:
Marsilio.
CANNON, JOHN (1973). Parliamentary Reform, 1640-1832. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
CEDERQVlST, jANE (1975). Collective Behavior in Stockholm 1850-1910. Un"ublished
paper, University of Stockholm.
CHlROT, DANIEL (1976). Social Change in a Peripheral Society. The Creation of a
Balkan Colony. NewYork: Academic.
DAHL, ROBERT A. (1975). "Governments and Political Oppositions," in vol. 3 of Fred
I. Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science. Reading,
Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
DAVIS, C. S. L. (1968). "The Pilgrimage of Grace Reconsidered." Past and Present 41:
54-76.
__ (1969). "Revoltes populaires en Angleterre (1500-1700)." Annales; Economies,
Societes, Civilisations 24: 24-60.
DAVIS, NATALlE ZEMON (1975). Society and Culture in Early Modern France.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
DEUTSCH, KARL (1953). Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
DODDS, MADELEINE HOPE, and RUTH DODDS (1915). The Pi/grimage of Grace.
1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
DUNBABIN, J. P. D. (1974). Rural Discontent in Nineteenth-Century Britain. New
York: Holmes & Meier.
Bibliography 321
DUNLOP, JOHNT. (1958).lndustrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.
DURAND, CLAUDE, and PAUL DUBOIS (1975). La greve. Enquete socioIogique. Paris:
Colin.
DUVERGER, MAURICE (1963). PoIiticai Parties. New York: Wiley.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1966). Modernization: Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
EISINGER, PETER K. (1973). "The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities."
American Political Science Review 67: 11-68.
ELDRIDGE, j. E. T. (1968). Industrial Disputes: Essays in the Sociology of Industrial
Relations. London: Routledge & Kegan PauL
ETZIONI, AMITAl (1968). The Active Society. New York: Free Press.
FRASER, DEREK (1970). "The Agitation for Parliamentary Reform," in j. T. Ward, ed.,
Popular Movements, c. 1830-1850. London: MacmiIlan.
GAIGNEBET. CLAUDE (1972). "Le combat de Carnaval et de Careme de P. Bruegel
(1559)." Annales; Economies, SocihJs, Civilisations 27: 313-345.
GILLIS, JOHN (1974). Youth and History. Tradition and Change in European Age
RelatIOns, 1770-present. New York: Academic.
GROH, DIETER (1974). "La Greve de masse, arme politique de la social-democratie
allemande en 1905/1906: mais a quoi sert une epee, si eHe n'a pas de poignee?"
Revue beige d'histoire contemporaine 5: 339-359.
GURR, TED ROBERT (1976). Rogues, Rebels, and Reformers. A Political History of
Urban Crime and Conflict. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
HANAGAN, MICHAEL (1976). Artisans and Industrial Workers: Work Structure,
Technological Change, and Worker Militancy in Three French Towns:
1870-1914. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in history, University of Michigan.
HEERS, JACQUES (1971). Fetes, jeux et joutes dan les socMtes d'Occident a la fin du
Moyen Age. Paris: Vrin.
HIBBS, DOUGLAS. A., jR. (1976a). "lndustrial Conflict in Advanced Industrial
Societies." American PoIitical Science Review 70: 1033-1058.
--- (1976b). "Long-Run Trends in Strike Activity in Comparative Perspective."
Paper C/76-18, Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
nology.
HOBSBAWM, E. J. (1959). Primitive Rebels. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
-- (1974). "Peasant Land Occupations." Past and Present 62: 120-152.
HOERDER, DIRK (1971). People and Mobs: Crowd Action in Massachusetts during the
American Revolution. 1765-1780. Berlin: privately pubIished.
INGHAM, GEOFFREY K. (1974). Strikes and lndustrial Conflict. Britain and
Scandinavia. London: Macmillan.
KAELBLE, HARTMUT. and HEINRICH VOLKMANN (1972). "Konjonktur und Streik in
322 Bibliography
Deutschland whrend des bergangs zum organisierten Kapitalismus."
Zeitschrift fur Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften 92: 513-544.
KARLBOM. ROLF (1967). Hungerupplopp och streiker, 1793-1867. Lund: Gleerup.
KAY, MARVIN L. MICHAEL (1976), "The North C.rolina Regulation, 1766-1776: A
Class Conflict," in Allred F. Young, ed" The Amerimn Revolution. DeKalb:
Northern Illinois University Press.
KNOWLES, K. G. j. c. (1952). Strikes: A Study in Irtdustrial Conflict with Special
Reference to British Experience. 2d. ed. Oxlord: Basil Biackwell.
KORNHAUSER, ARTHUR et al" eds., (1954). Industrial Conflict. New York: McGraw-
HilI.
LAFFERTY, WILLIAM (1971). Economic Development and the Response of Labor in
Scandinavia. 0510: Universitets forlaget.
LAMMERS, CORNELIUS (1969). "Strikes and Mutinies: A Comparative Study 01 Orga-
nizational Conflicts Between Rulers and Ruled." Administrative Science Quarter-
ly 14: 448-472.
LAUBIER, PA TRICK DE (1968). "Esquisse d'une theorie du syndiealisme." Sociologie du
Travail10: 362-392.
LIND, jOAN (1973). Foreign and Domestic Conflict: The British and Swedish Labor
Movements 1900-1950. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sociology, University
of Michigan.
LORWIN, VAL (1958). 'Working-Class Politics and Economie Development in
Western Europe." American Historical Review 63: 338-351.
LUNDKVIST, SVEN (1977). Folkrrelsema i det svenska sam hallet, 1850-1920. Stock-
hoim: Almqvist & Wiksell.
MARA VALL, JOSE ANTONIO (1972). Estado modemo y mentalidad soeial. Siglos XV a
XVII. 2 vols. Madrid: Ediciones de ta Revista de Occidente.
MARX, GARYT. (1971). "CiviI Disorder and the Agents 01 Social Contro!," in Gary T.
Marx, ed., Racial Conflict. Boston: Little, Btown.
__ (1974). "Thoughts on a Negleded Category of Sodal Movement Participant,
The Agent Provocateur arid the lriformanL" American Journal of Sociology 80:
402-442.
MARX, KARL (1970-72), Capital. 3 vois. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
MCCARTHY, jOHND" and MAYER N, ZALD (1973). The Trend of Soeial MO'IJements in
America: Professionalization and Resource Mobillzation. Morristown, New
Jersey; Gener'al Learning CorporaUon ..
MERRIMAN, JOHN (1975). "Radie.lisation and Repression: A 5tudy of the
Demobilization of' the 'Democ-Socs' during the Secortd French Republk/
I
In Roger
Prite, ed" Revolution and Readion. 184-8 and the Seccmd French Re'public.
London: Croom Helm.
MICHELS, ROllERT (1949), Polilical Parties. Glencoe, I1Iinofs: Free Press. First
published in 1915,
Bibliography 323
MOORE, SALLY FALK, and BARBARA G. MYERHOFF (1975). Symbol and Polities in
Communalldeology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
MOTTEZ, ROBERT (1966). Systemes de salaire et politiques patronales. Essai sur revo-
lution des pratiques et des ideologies patronales. Paris: Editions du Centre
Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique.
NIPPERDEY, THOMAS (1972). "Verein als soziale Struktur in Deutschland im spten
18. und frhen 19. Jahrhundert," in Hartmut Boockman et al., Geschichts-
wissenschaft and Vereinswesen im 19. Jahrhundert. Gttingen, Germany:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
OZOUF, MONA (1975). "Space and Time in the Festivals of the French Revolution."
Comparative Studies in Society and History 17: 372-384.
PARKER, GEOFFREY (1973). "Mutiny and Discontent in the Spanish Army of Flanders
1572-1607." Past and Present 58: 38-52.
PENCAVEL, JOHN H. (1970). "An Investigation into lndustrial Strike Activity in
Britain." Economica 37: 239-256.
PERROT, MICHELLE (1974). Les ouvriers en greve. 2 vols. Paris: Mouton.
REES, ALBERT (1952). "Industrial Conflict and Business Fluctuations." Journal of
Polilical Economy 60: 371-382.
RIMLINGER, GASTON V. (1960). "The Legitimation of Protest: A Comparative Study
in Labor History." Comparative Studies in Society and History 2: 329-343.
ROKKAN, STEIN (1970). Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative
Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo: Universitets forlaget.
ROSS, ARTHUR M" and GEORGE W. HARTMAN (1960). Changing Patterns of Indus-
trial Conflict. New York: Wiley.
RUDE, GEORGE (1962). Wilkes and Liberty. London: Oxford University Press.
__ (1971). Hanoverian London. London: Secker & Warburg.
SHORTER, EDWARD, and CHARLES TILLY (1973). "Les vagues de grhes en France,
1890-1968." Annales; Economies, SocMt/s, Civilisations 28: 857-887.
___ (1974). Strikes in France, 1830-1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
SKEELS, JACK W. (1971). "Measures 01 U.S. Strike Activity." Labor and Industrial
Relations Review 24: 515-525.
SMITH, A. W. (1966). "Some Folklore Elements in Movements 01 Protest." Folklore 77:
241-252.
SNYDER, DAVID (1974). Determinants 01 lndustrial Confliet: Historieal Models of
Strikes in France, Italy and the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in
sociology, University of Michigan.
__ (1975). "Institutional Setting and Industrial ConfIict: Comparative Analyses
of France, ItaIy and the Uni ted States." American Sociological Review 40:
259-278.
324 Bibliography
THOMPSON, E. B. (1963), The Making of the English Working Class, London: Gol-
lancz.
___ (1972)." 'Rough Music': Le Charivari anglais." Annales; Economies, Societes,
Civilisations 27: 285-312.
TILLY, CHARLES, LOUISE TILLY, and RICHARD TILLY (1975), The Rebellious Century,
1830-1930, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
TILLY, RICHARD, and CHARLES TILLY (1971), "An Agenda for European Eeonomic
History in the 1970s." Journal of Economic History 31: 184-197.
VANDERKAMP, JOHN (1970), "Eeonomic Aetivity and Strikes in Canada," Industrial
Relations 9: 215-230.
VARAGNAC, ANDRE (1947). Civilisation traditionnelle et genres de vie. Paris: Albin
Michel.
WEINTRAUB, ANDREW (1966), "Prosperity versus Strikes: An Empirical Approach,"
lndustrial and Labor Relations Review 19: 231-238.
6 Colleetive Violenee
ADAMS, GRAHAM, jR. (1966). The Age of Industrial Violence, New York: Columbia
University Press.
AFRlCA, THOMAS W. (1971), "Urban Violence in Imperial Rome," Journal of Inter-
disciplinary History 2: 3-22,
AMIOT, MICHEL et al. (1968). La violence dans le monde actuel. Paris: Desclee de
Brouwer for Centre d'Etudes de la Civilisation Contemporaine.
ARENDT, HANNAH (1970), On Violence, New York: Hareourt, Braee and World.
BERGESEN, ALBERT j. (1976). White or Blaek Riots? A Reeonsideration of the Sources
of Violenee during the Detroit and Newark Raee Riots of 1967, Unpublished
paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.
BERNOUX, PHILIPPE et al. (1969), Violences et sodete, Paris: Editions Economie et
Humanisme/Editions Ouvrieres.
BIENEN, HENRY (1968). Violenee and Social Chang", A Review of Current Literature,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BLUMENTHAL, MONICAet al. (1972). Justifying Violene", Attitudes of Ameriean Men.
Ann Arbor: Institute for Sodal Research, University of Michigan.
BOHSTEbT, JOHN (1972), Riots in England, 1790-1810, with Spedal Referenee to
Devonshire. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation in history, Harvard University.
BROWN RICHARD MAXWELL (1975), Strain of Violence, Historieal Studies of
Violence and Vigilantism. New York: Oxford University Press.
CALHOUN, DANIEL (1970). "Studying American Violence," Journal of Interdisci-
plinary History 1: 163-185.
CONANT, RALPH W., and MOLLY APPLE LEVIN, eds, (1969). Problems in Research on
Community Violence. New York: Praeger.
Bibliography 325
CONNERY, DONALD, ed. (1968). "Urban Riots: Violenee and Sodal Change,"
Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 29: entire issue.
CONOT, ROBERT (1968). Rivers of Blood, Years of Darkness. New York: Bantam.
COUNTRYMAN, EDWARD (1976), " 'Out of the Bounds of the Law': Northern Land
Rioters in the Eighteenth Century," in Alfred F. Young, ed., The American
Revolution. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
CRITCHLEY, T. A. (1970), The Conquest of Violence: Order and Liberty in Britain.
London: Constable.
DIAZ DEL MORAL, JUAN (1967). Historia de las agitadones campesinas
andaluzas-C6rdoba. 2d. ed. Madrid: EI Libro dei Boisillo.
ELLUL, jACQUES (1970). Violence, London: S. C. M. Books.
FARRE MOREGO, ]. M. (1922). Los atentados sociales en Espana. Madrid: Artes
Gr3ficas.
FEAGIN, jOER. and HARLAN HAHN (1973). Ghetto Revolts. New York: Maemillan.
FEIERABEND, IVO K., and ROSALIND L. FEIERABEND (1966). "Aggressive Behaviors
within Polities, 1948-1962: A Cross-National Study." Journal of Confliet Resolu-
tion 10: 249-271.
FISCHER, WOLFRAM (1966). "Sodal Tensions at Early Stages of lndustrialization,"
Comparative Studies in Society and History 9: 64-83.
FOGELSON, ROBERT M. (1971). Violenee as Protest: A Study of Riots and Ghettos.
Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
GAMSON, WILLIAM A (1968). "Stable Unrepresentation in American Society,ft
American Behavioral Scientist 12: 15-21.
___ (1975). The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, lllinois: Dorsey,
GEERTZ, CLIFFORD (1968), "Is America by Nature a Violent Sodety?" New York
Times Magazine, April 28.
GIRARD, LOUIS (1961). Etude comparee des mouvements revolutionnaires en France
en 1830,1848, et 1870-71. 3 parts. Paris: Centre de Documentation Universitaire.
GRAHAM, HUGH DAVIS, and TED ROBERT GURR, ed,. (1969), Violenee in Ameriea:
Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: V.S. Government
Printing Office.
GRIMSHAW, ALLEN D. (1969). Racial Violenee in the United States. Chicago: Aldine.
GROFMAN, BERNARD N., and EDWARD N. MULLER (1973). "The Strange Case of
Relative Gratification and Potential for Political Violence: the V-Curve
Hypothesis." American Political Sdence Review 67: 514-539.
GRUNDY, KENNETH W .. and MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (1974), The Ideologies of Violence,
Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
GURR, TED ROBERT: PETERN. GRABOSKY, and RICHARD C. HULA (1977), The Polities
of Crime and Conflict, A Comparative History of Four Cities. Beverly Hills, Cali-
fornia: Sage.
326 Bibliography
, ,
GUZMAN, GERMAN et al. (1962). La violencia en Colombia. 2 vols. Bogota: Universi-
dad Nadonal.
HECHTER, MICHAEL (1975), Internal Colonialism, The Celtie hinge in British
National Development, 1536-1966, Berkeley: University of California Press.
HIRSCH, HERBERT and DAVID PERRY, eds. (1973). Violenee as Polities. New York:
Harper & Row.
HOBSBAWM, E. j. (1969). Bandits. New York: Delacorte.
HOFSTADTER, RICHARD (1970). "ReHections on Violence in the United States," in
Richard Hofst?dter and Michael Wallace, eds., American Violence: A Documen-
tary History. New York: Knopf.
HOLMBERG, jAMES C. (1971). "The Rush to Violence in Sodal Analysis: A Review
Essay." Historical Methods Newsletter 4: 88-99.
HUDSON, MICHAEL c. (1970). CondWons of Politieal Violence and Instability.
Beverly HilIs, California: Sage. Sage Professional Papers, 01-005.
JIOBU, ROBERT M. (1974). "City CharacterisHcs and Radal Violence." Social Seienee
Quarterly 55: 52-64.
KIRKHAM, jAMES F.: SHELDON G. LEVY: and WILLIAM j. CROTTY (1970). Assassina-
Uon and PoliticaI Violence. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
LODHI, A. Q., and CHARLES TILLY (1973). "Urbanization, Criminality and Collective
Violence in Nineteenth Century France." American Journal of Sociology 79:
296-318.
LUPSHA, PETER (1969). "On Theories of Urban Violence." Urban Affairs Quarterly 4:
273-296.
__ (1971). "Explanation of Political Violence: Some Psychological Theories
versus Indignation." Politics and Society 2: 89-104.
MeHALE, VINCENT E., and ERIC A. jOHNSON (1976). "Urbanization, IndustrializaHon
and Crime in Imperial Germany, Part 1." Social Science History 1: 45-78.
MEHDEN, FRED VON DER (1973). Comparative Politieal Violence. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
IIIARDIN, TERRY (1971a). "Theories of Conflict Management." Peaee Research Re-
views 4: 1-93,
___ (1971b). Violence and the State: A Critique of Empirieal Politieal Theory.
Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications. Sage Professional Papers, Compara-
tive Politics Series, series 01-020, vol. 2.
__ (1972), "Conflicting Conceptions of Political Violence," in Cornelius P.
Cotter, ed., Political Science AnnuaL vol. 4. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
NESVOLD, BETTY A. (1969). "Scalogram Analysis of Politieal Violence." Comparative
Politieal Studies 2: 172-194.
OBERSCHALL, ANTHONY (1977). "The Dedine of the 1960's Sodal Movements," in
Louis Kriesberg, ed., Research in Sodal Movements, Conflict, and Change.
Greenwich, Conn.: JA! Press, forthcoming.
Bibliography 327
PARET, PETER, andjOHNW. SHY (1994). Guerrillas in the 19605. New York: Praeger.
PORTER, RANDALL c., and JACK H. NAGEL (1976). "Dedining Inequality and Rising
Expectations: Relative Deprivation and the Black Urban Riots." Philadelphia:
School of u b l i ~ and Urban Poliey, University of Pennsylvania. Fels Discussion
Paper9P.
PRICE, RICHARD N. (1975). "The Other Face of Respectability: Violence in the Man-
chester Briekmaking Trade, 1859-1870." Past and Present 66: 110-132.
RICHTER, DONALD (1965). Public Order and Popular Disturbances in Creat Britain,
1865-1914. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in modern history, Unive;sity of
Maryland.
____ (1971). "The Role of Mob Riot in Vietorian Elections, 1865-1885." Victorian
Studies14-15: 19-28.
RUBENSTEIN, RICHARD E. (1970). Rebels in Eden, Mass Political Violenee in the
United States. Boston: Little, Brown.
RUMPF, E. (1959). Nationalismus und Sozialismus in Irland. Meisenheim: Hain.
SHEPPARD, FRANCIS (1971). London 1808-1870: The Infernal Wen. London: Secker
& Warburg.
SHORTER, EDWARD, and CHARLES TILLY (1971). "Le dedin de la greve violente en
France de 1890 a 1935." Le mouvement social79: 95-118.
SKOLNICK, jEROME (1969). The PoiWes of Protest, Violent Aspecls of Protest and
Confrontation. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
SNYDER, DAVlD, and WILLIAM R. KELLY (1976). "Industrial Violence in Italy,
1878-1903." Ameriean Journal of Sociology 82: 131-162.
___ (1977). "Conflict Intensity, Media Sensitivity and the Validity of Newspaper
Data." American Sociological Review 42: 105-123.
SNYDER, DAVlD, and CHARLES TILLY (1972). "Hardship and CoHective Violence in
France, 1830 to 1960." American Sodological Review 37: 520-532.
SPILERMAN, SEYMOUR (1976). "Structural CharacterisHcs 01 CiHes and the Severity
of Racial Disorders." American Sodological Review 41: 771-792. .
STEVENSON, JOHN (1974). "Food Riots in England, 1792-1818," in John Stevenson
and Roland Quinault, eds., Popular Protest and Public Order. Six Studies in Brit-
ish History, 1790-1920. London: Ceorge Allen & Unwin.
STOHL, MICHAEL (1976). War and Domestie Politieal Violenee. The Ameriean
Capacity for Repression and Reaction. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
TAFT, PHILIP, and PHILIP ROSS (1969). "Ameriean Labor Violence: Its Causes,
Character and Outcome," in Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr, eds.,
Violen ce in America. Washington, D.C.: U .S. Government Printing Office.
THOMPSON, E. P. (1971). "The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the
Eighteenth Century." Past and Present 50: 76-136.
TILLY, CHARLES (1970). "The Changing Place of CoHective Violence," in Melvin
Richter, ed., Essays in Sodal and Political History. Cambridge: Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
328 Bibliography
__ (1975). "Food Supply and Publie Order in Modern Europe," in Charles Tilly,
ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
TILLY, LOUISE A. (1971). "The Food Riot as a Form of Political Confliet in Franee."
Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2: 23-57.
TILLY, RICHARD (1975). Protest and Colleetive Violenee in Germany During
Modernization (1800-1914). Unpublished manuscript, Institut fr Wirtschafts-
und Sozialgeschichte, Westflische Wilhelms-Universitt.
TOCH, HANS (1969). Violent Men, An lnquiry into the Psyehology of Violence. Chi-
cago: Aldine.
WALTER, E. V. (1969). Terror and Resistane", A Study of Political Violence. New
York: Oxford University Press.
WERNETTE, DEE RICHARD (1974). Politieal Violenee and German Eleetions: 1930 and
July, 1932. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in sociology, University of Michigan.
WOLFGANG, MARVIN E., and FRANCO FERRACUTl (1967). The Subeulture of Vio-
lence. London: Tavistock.
7 Revolution and Rebellion
AMANN, PETER (1962). "Revolution, ARedefinition." Politieal Seienee Quarterly 77,
36-53.
ANDRESKI. STANISLAV (1968). Military Organization and Sodety. Berkeley, Univer-
sity of California Press.
ARDANT. GABRlEL (1965). Theorie soeiologique de /'impot. 2 vols. Paris: SEVPEN.
ARENDT, HANNAH (1963). On Revolution. London, Faber & Faber.
__ (1971). "Thoughts on Polities and Revolution." New York Review of Books
16,8-20.
AYA, RODERICK (1975). "The Missed Revolution. The Fate of Rural Rebels in Sicily
and Southern Spain, 1840-1950." Papers on European and Mediterranean
Societies, Antropologisch-Sociologisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam, no.
3.
BAECHLER, JEAN (1970). Les phenomenes revolutionnaires. Paris: Presses Universi-
taires de Prance.
BELL, DAVIDV. j. (1973). Resistanee and Revolution. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
BEZUCHA, ROBERT (1974). The Lyon Uprising of 1834. Sodal and Politieal Conflict in
the Early July Monarchy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
BRAUDEL, FERNAND (1966). La Mediterranee et le monde mediterraneen Ci l'epoque
de Philippe 11. 2d. ed. Pari" CoHn.
BRENAN, GERALD (1943). The Spanish Labyrinth, An Aeeount of the Sodal and
Political Background of the Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BRINTON, CRANE (1965). The Anatomy of Revolution. Rev. ed. New York, Knopf.
Bibliography 329
CALVERT, PETER (1970). A Study of Revolution. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
CANTOR, NORMAN F. (1970). The Age of Protest. Dissent and Rebellion in the
Twentieth Century. London: George Allen & Unwin.
CHIROT, DANlEL, and CHARLES RAGIN (1975). "The Market, Tradition and Peasant
Rebellion: The Case of Romania in 1907." American Sociological Review 40:
428-444.
CHORLEY, KATHERINE (1943). Armies and the Art of Revolution. London, Faber &
Faber.
CLARK, MARTIN (1973). "The Failure of Revolution in Italy, 1919-1920." Centre for
the Advanced Study of Italian SocietYf University of Reading, Occasional Papers
No.5.
COBB, RICHARD (1957). "The Revolutionary MentaHty in Franee, 1793-1794."
History 42,81-96.
DALY, WlLLlAM T. (1972). "The Revolutionary, A Review and Synthesis." Beverly
Hills, California: Sage. Sage Professional Papers, Comparative Politics Series,
01-025.
DAVIES, JAMES c. (1962). "Toward a Theory of Revolution." American Sociological
Review 27: 5-19.
DEBRAY, REGIS (1967). Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle and Political
Struggle in LaNn America. New York: Grove.
DEL CARRIA, RENZO (1966). Proletari senza rivoluzione: Storia delle classe subalterne
italiene dal1860 al 1954. 2 vols. Milan: Oriente.
DUNN, lOHN (1972). Modern Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DUVEAU, GEORGES (1965).1848. Pari" Gallimard.
ECKSTEIN, HARRY (1965). "On the Etiology of Internal Wars." History and Theory 4,
133-163.
ECKSTEIN, SUSAN (1976). "The Impact of Revolution, A Comparative Analysis of
Mexico and Bolivia." Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Sage Professional Papers,
Contemporary Political Sociology Series, 06-016. .
EDWARDS, LYFORD P. (1927). The Natural History of Revolution. Chieago, Univer-
sHy of Chicago Press.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1963). The Political Systems of Empires. New Yorko Free Press.
ELLUL, jACQUES (1969). Autopsie de la rJvolution. Pari" Calmann-Levy.
ENGELS, FRIEDRICH (1886). Herrn Eugen Dhrings Umwlzung der Wissenschaft.
Zurich, Volksbuchhandlung.
FANON. FRANTZ (1964). The Wretehed of the Earth. New York, Grove.
FLETCHER, ANTONY (1968). Tudor Rebellions. London, Longmans.
FRIEDRICH, CARL j" ed. (1966). Revolution. New Yorko Atherton.
GAMSON, WILLIAMA. (1968). Powerand Discontent. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.
330 Bibfiography
GILLlS, JOHN (1970). "Political Decay and the European Revolutions, 1789-1848."
World Polities 22, 344-370.
GLUCKMAN, MAX (1963). Order and Rebellion in Tribai Afriea. New York, Free
Press.
GORZ, ANDRE (1969). Reforme et revolutiolt. Paris: Seui!.
GREENE, THOMAS H, (1974). Comparative Revolutionary Movements, Englewod
CHffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
GURR, TED ROBERT (1969). Why Men Rebe/. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
__ (1973), "The Revolution-Sodal Change Nexus. Some Old Theories and New
Hypotheses." Comparative Polifies 5: 359-392.
HERMASSI, ELBAKI (1976). "Toward a Comparative Study of Revolutions." Com-
parative Studies in Sodety and History 16: 211-235.
HILTON, RODNEY (1973). Bond Men Made Free. Medieval Peasant Movements and
the English Rising of 1381. London: Temple Smith.
HOBSBAWM, E. j. (1962), The Age of Revolution. Europe, 1789-1848. London:
Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
(1973). Revolutioharies. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
HUIZER, GERRIT (1973). Peasant Rebellion in Latin America. Harmondsworth, Eng-
land: Penguin.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven:
Yale University Press.
IANOS, ANDREW (1966). Revolutioltary Change. Boston, Little, Brown.
IESSOP, BOB (1972). SodalOrder, Reform and Revolu'tion. A Power, Exchange and
lnstitutionalization Pers'pective. London: Macmillan.
KAUTSKY, lOHN H. (1975), Patterns of Modernizing Revolution, Mexico and the
Soviet Union. Beverly HiIIs, California: Sage. Sage Professional Papers, Com-
pa.rative Polifks Series, 01-056.
KIM KYUNG-WON (1970), Revolution and International System, New York: New
York Ur'iiversity Press.
KIRCHHElMER, OTTO (1965). "Confining CondHions and Revolutionary Break-
throughs/' Ameriean Politieal Science Review 59: 964-974.
KORPI, WALTER (1974a), "Con(]ict and the Balance 01 Power/' Aeta Sodologiea 17:
99-114,
__ (1974b). "ConfHcf, Power and Relative' Deprivation." American PoUficaI d ~
ence Review 68: i56'1-1578.
KORT, FRED (1952), "The Quantificatin of Aristtle's Theory 01 Revolution." Ameri-
ean Political Scienee Rrro/ew 46: 436-493.
LANGER, WILLIAM L (1969). Palitkal and Sodal Upheaval, 1832-1852, New Yotk:
Harper & Row,
Bibliography 331
LAQUEUR, WALTER (1968). "Revolution." International Eneyclopedia of the Soeial
Scienees 13: 501-507.
LARSON, REIDAR (1970). Theories of Revolution, from Marx to the First Russian
Revolution. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
LEGGETT, lOHN (1973), T aking State Power. New York: Harper & Row.
LENIN, V. I. (1967a). 'The Valuable Admissions of Pitirim Sorokin," in Selected
Works. New York: International Publishers.
__ (1967b). "What Is to Be Done? Burning Questions of Our Movement," in
Selected Works. New York: International Publishers.
LEWIS, JOHN WILSON, ed. (1974). Peasant Rebellion and Communist Revolution in
Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
L1DA, CLARA E. (1972). Anarquismo y revolucion en la Espaiia dei XIX. Madrid,
Siglo.
L1PSET, S. M., and EARL RAAB (1970). The Polities of Unreason, Right-Wing Extrem-
ism in Ameriea, 1790-1970. NewYork: Harper & Row.
LUKES, STEVEN (1974). Powe" A Radical View, London, Macmillan.
MAO TSE-TUNG (1961), "Carry the Revolution Through to the End," in vol. 4 of
Selected Works. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
___ (1965a). "The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party," in vol.
2 of Selected Works. Peking: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
__ (1965b). "On Protracted War," in vol. 2 of Selected Works. Peking, Foreign
Languages Publishing House.
MELOTII, UMBERTO (1965). Rivoluzione et societa. Milan: La Culturale.
MITCHELL, HARVEY (1968). "The Vendee and Counterrevolution: A Review Essay."
French Historical Studies 5: 405-429.
MOLLAT, MICHEL, and PHILIPPE WOLFF (1973). The Popular Revolutions of the Late
Middle Ages. London: George Allen & Unwin.
MONNEROT,IULES (1969). Sociologie de la nivolution. Paris: Artheme Fnard.
MOORE, BARRINGTON, jR. (1966). Social Origins of Dietatorship and Democraey.
Boston: Beacon.
__ (1969). "Revolution in America?" New York Review of Books, January 30:
6-12.
NOYES, P. H. (1966). Organization and Revolution. Working Class Associations in the
German Revolutions of 1848-49. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PAICE, JEFFERY (1975). Agrarian Revolution. Sodal Movements and Export Agricul-
ture in the Underdeveloped World. New York: Free Press.
PINKNEY, DAVID (1964). "The Crowd in the French Revolution of 1830." Ameriean
Historical Review 70: 1-17.
ROMANO, SALVATORE FRANCESCO (1959). Storia dei Fasci Siciliani. Bari: Laterza.
332 Bibliography
RULE, jAMES, and CHARLES TILLY (1972). "1830 and the Unnatural History 01 Revolu-
tion." Journal of Sodal /ssues 28: 49-76.
RUSSELL, D. E. H. (1974). Rebellion, Revolution, and Armed Force. New York: Aca-
demic.
SABEAN, DAVID (1972). Landbesitz und Gesellschaft am Vorabend des Bauernkriegs.
Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
SALERT, BARBARA (1976). Revolutions and Revolutionaries. Four Theories. New
York: Elsevier .
SCHEINER, IRWIN (1973). "The Mindlul Peasant: Sketches lor a Study 01 Rebellion."
Journal of Asian Studies 32: 579-59l.
SKOCPOL, THEDA (1976). "France, Russia, China: A Struetural Analysis 01 Sodal
Revolution." Comparative Studies in Sodety and History 16: 175-210.
SMELSER, NEIL!. (1963). Theory of Colleetive Behavior. New York: Free Press.
SOLDANI, SIMONETTA (1973). "Contadini, operai e 'popolo' nella rivoluzione deI
1848-49 in ltalia." Studi Storiei 14: 557-613.
SOREL, GEORGES (1961). Reflections on Violence. New York: Macmillan.
STARBUCK, WILLlAM H. (1973). "Tadpoles into Armageddon and Chrysler into
Butterflies." Sodal Sdence Research 1-2: 81-109.
STONE, LAWRENCE (1972). The Causes of the English Revolution, 1529-1642. Lon-
don: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
TANTER, RAYMOND, and MANUS MlDLARSKY (1967). "A Theory 01 Revolution."
Journal of Conflict Resolution 11: 264-280.
TILLY, CHARLES (1964). "Reflections on the Revolutions of Paris: An Essay on Recent
Historical Writing." Sodal Problems 12: 99-12I.
___ (1973). "Does Modernization Breed Revolution?" Comparative Po/Wes 5:
425-447.
__ (1975). "Revolutions and Collective Violence," in vol. 3 of Fred 1. Greenstein
and Nelson Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Scienee. Reading, Massachusetts:
Addison-Wesley.
TILLY, CHARLES, and LYNN LEES (1974). "Le peuple de juin 1848." Annales; Econo-
mies, SocJtes, Civilisations 29: 1061-1091.
TILLY, LOUISE A. (1972). "I Fatti di Maggio: The Working Class 01 Milan and the
Rebellion of 1898," in Robert J. Bezucha, ed., Modern European Socia! History.
Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath.
TROTSKY, LEON (1965). History of the Russian Revolution. 2 vols. London: Gollancz.
WAKEMAN, FREDERlC, !R. (1966). Strangers at the Gate; Sorial Disorders in South
China, 1839-1861. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WALDMAN, ERIC (1958). The Spartarist Uprising of 1919. Milwaukee: Marquette
University Press.
Bibliography 333
WALZER, MICHAEL (1970). "The Revolutionary Uses 01 Repression," in Melvin
Richter, ed., Essays in Theory and History: An Approach to the Social Sciences,
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
WILKIE, JAMES W. (1970). The Mexican Revolution. Federal Expenditure and Social
Change since 1910. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
WOLF, ERIC (1969). Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper &
Row.
WOMACK, JOHN, jR. (1969). Zapata and the Mexiean Revolution. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
ZAGORIN, PEREZ (1976). "Prologomena to the Cqmparative History of Revolution in
Early Modern Europe." Comparative StuClies in Society and History 18: 151-174.
8 Condusions and New Beginnings
, ,
BERCE, YVES-MARIE (1974a). Croquants et Nu-Pieds. Les soulevements paysans en
France du XV/e au X/Xe siede. Paris: Gallimard/Juilliard.
___ (1974b). Histoire des Croquants. 2 vols. Paris: Droz.
BROWN, RICHARD MAXWELL, and DON E. FEHRENBACHER, eds. (1977). Tradition,
Conflict, and Modernization: Perspectives on the American Revolution. New
York: Academic, forthcoming.
COBBAN, ALFRED (1964). The Sorial Interpretation of the Freneh Revolution. Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press.
DARVALL, F. O. (1934). Popular Disturbances and Publie Order in Regeney England.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GODECHOT, jACQUES (1970). The T aking of the Bastille. New York: Scribner.
GRATTON, PHILIPPE (1971). Les luttes de classes dans les campagnes. Paris:
Anthropos.
HAMBURGER, !OSEPH (1963). James Mill and the Art of Revolution. New Haven, Yale
University Press.
HAY, DOUGLAS et al. (1975). Albion's Fatal Tree. Crime and Soriety in Eighteenth-
Century England. New York: Pantheon.
HINDUS, MICHAEL S. (1971). "A City 01 Mobocrats and Tyrants: Mob Violence in
Boston, 1747-1863." /ssues in Criminology 6: 55-83.
HOERDER, DIRK (1977). Crowd Action in a Revolutionary Sodety. Massachusetts
1765-1780. NewYork: Academic.
HOFFMAN, RONALD (1976). "The 'Disaffected' in the Revolutionary South," in Allred
F. Young, ed., The American Revolution. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University
Press,
jOJ'lES, DAVID j. V. (1973). Before Rebeeea. Popular Protests in Wales, 1793-1835.
London: Allen Lane.
334 Bibliography
LAURENT, ROBERT (1957). Les Vignerons de la 'Cbte d'Or' au dix-neuvieme siede. 2
vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
KNOLLENBERG, BERNHARD (1965). Origins of the American Revolution: 1759-1766.
Rev. ed. New York: Pree Press.
LEBRUN, FRANCOIS (1967). LeXVIIesiJcle. Paris: Colin. Colleetion "U."
LE GOFF, T. j. A., and D. M. G. SUTHERLAND (1974). "The Revolution and the Rural
Community in Eighteenth-Century Brittany." Past and Present 62: 96-119.
LEMISCH, jESSE (1968). "The American Revolution Seen from the Bottom Up," in Bar-
ton J. Bernstein, ed., Towards a New Past. New York: Vintage.
LEMISCH, jESSE, and JOHN K. ALEXANDER (1972). "The White Oaks, lack Tar, and the
Coneept of the 'Inartieulate'." William and Mary Quarterly 29: 109-142.
LOCKRIDGE, KENNETH P. (1976). "The American Revolution, Modernization, and
Man." Working Paper 139, Center for Research on Sodal Organization, Univer-
sity of Michigan.
LUBLlNSKAYA, A. D. (1968). French Absolutism: The Crucial Phase, 1620-1629.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LUCAS, COLlN (1973). The Structure of the Terror. The Example of lavogues and the
Lofre. London: Oxford University Press.
MALER, PAULINE (1972). From Resistance to Revolution. Colonial Radicals and the
Development of American Opposition to Britain, 1765-1776. New York: Random
House.
MATHER, F. C. (1959). Public Order in the Age of the Chartists. Manchester: Man-
chester University Press.
MAZAURIC, CLAUDE (1970). Sur la revolution franf;aise. Paris: Editions Sodales.
MERRIMAN, JOHN (1974). "Sodal Conflict in Franee and the Limoges Revolution of
April 27, 1848." Societas 4: 21-38.
__ (1975). "The DemoiseIles of Ariege," in lohn Merriman, ed., 1830 in France.
NewYork: Franklin Watts.
MOORE, BARRINGTON, JR, (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy.
Boston: Beacon.
MOUSNlER, ROLAND (1970). La plume, la faucille et le marteau. Paris: Presses Uni-
versitaires de France.
MUNBY, LlONELM., ed. (1971). The Luddites and Other Essays. London: Katanka.
MUNGER, FRANK W., JR. (1974). "A Comparison of the Dissatis!actions and Collee-
tive Action Models of Protest: The Case of the Working Classes of Lancashire,
England, 1793-1830." Working Paper 105, Center for Research on Sodal Organi-
zation, University of Michigan.
__ (1977). Popular Protest and its Suppression in Early Nineteenth Century
Lancashire, England: A Study of Historical Models of Protest and Repression.
Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
BibJiography 335
NASH, GARY B. (1976). "Social Change and the Growth of Prerevolutionary Urban
Radkalism," in Alfred F. YOllng, ed., Th American Revolution, DeKalb:
Northern Illinois University Press.
PALMER, KR. (1977). 'The Fading Dream: How European Revolu.tionaries Have Seen
the American Revolution," in Bede Lackner and Kenneth R. Philp, eds., The
Walter Prescott Webb Memorial Lectures. Essays on Modern European Revolu-
tionary History. Austin: University of Texas Press.
PEACOCK, A.). (1965). Bread or Blood: The Agrarian Riots in East Anglia: 1816. Lon-
don: Gollancz.
PILLORGET, RENE (1975). Les mouvemrmts insurrectionnels de Provence entre 1596 et
1715. Paris: Pedone.
PORCHNEV, BORIS (1963). Les soul/wements populaires en France de 1623 a 1648.
Paris: Mouton.
POWELL, G. BINGHAM (1973). "Incremental Demoeratization: The British Reform Aet
of 1832," in Gabriel A. Almond, Seott C. Flanagan and Robert }. Mundt, eds.,
Crisis, Choke and Change. Historkai Studies of Political Development. Boston:
LittIe, Brown.
ROGERS, ALAN (1974). Empire and Liberty. American Resistance to British Author-
ity, 1755-1763. Berkeley: University of California Press.
ROKKAN, STEIN (1969). "Models and Methods in the Comparative Study of Nation
Building." Acta Sodologica 12: 52-73.
ROTHMAN, STANLEY (1970). "Barrington Moore and the Dialeetics of Revolution:
An Essay Review." American Political Science Review 64: 61-82.
ROUPNEL, GASTON (1955). La Ville et la campagne au XVIIe siJcle. Etude sur les
populations du pays dijonnais. Paris: Colin.
RUDE, GEORGE (1964). The Crowd in History. A Study of Popular Disturbances in
France and England, 1730-1848. New York: Wiley.
__ (1967). "English Rural and Urban Disturbances on the Eve of the First Reform
Bill, 1830-1831." Past and Present 37: 87-102.
__ (1970). Paris and London in the 18th Century. London: Collins.
RYERSON, R. A. (1974). "Politieal Mobilization and the American Revolution: The
Resistance Movement in Philadelphia, 1765 to 1776." William and Mary
Quarterly 31: 565-58$.
SAINT-JACOB, PIERRE DE (1960). Les Paysans du Bourgogne du Nord. Paris: Les Beiles
Lettres.
SMITH, W. A. (1965). Anglo-Colonial Society and the Mob, 1740-1775. Unpublished
Ph. D. dissertation in history, Claremont Graduate School and University Center.
STONE, LAWRENCE (1967). "News from Everywhere." New York Review of Books,
August 24, 31-35. [Review of Barrington Moore, }r., SodalOrigins of Dictator-
ship and Democracy.}
336 Bibliography
TOCQUEVILLE, ALEXIS OE (1955). The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New
York: Doubleday Anchor.
VESTER, MICHAEL (1970). Die Entstehung des Proletariats als Lernprozess. Die Entste-
hung antikapitalistischer Theorie und Praxis in England 1792-1848. Frankfurt
a/Main: Europaische Verlaganstalt.
WILLlAMS, GWYN W. (1968). Artisans and Sans-Culottes. Popular Movements in
France and Britain during the French Revolution. London: Arnold.
WOOO, GOROON S. (1966). "A Note on Mobs in the American Revolution." William
and Mary Quarterly (3d series) 23: 635-642.
YOUNG, ALFREO F. (1973). "Pope's Day, Tar and Feathers and 'Cornet Joyce, Jun:
From Ritual to Rebellion in Boston, 1745-1775." UnpubIished paper presented to
the Anglo-American Labor Historians
'
Conference, Rutgers University.
A.F.L.-C.1.0., 101
Abolition, 42, 179
Advantage-of-familiarity model, 154-55
Africa, 76
Aged,107
Age-groups, 145
Age-sex groups, 203
Agriculture, 221, 235, 239; disturbances,
95, 199-200, 233, 239-40; workers,
146-47, 159. See also Farmers; Land;
Peasantry
Aircraft industry, 179
Alberoni, Francesco, 38, 42
Algeria, 45
Amann, Peter, 191
American Chiropractic Association, 77
American Medical Association, 77, 101
Aminzade, Ronald, 80
Amnesty, 152
Anarchists, 214
Anarcho-Communists, 137
Anarcho-syndicalism, 161
Angola, 200
Anomic collective action, 17, 18, 19, 23,
29
Arbitration and negotiation, 164, 166
Ardant, Gabriel, 205-6
Arendt, Hannah, 175
Aristocracy, 103, 146, 185, 220, 238,
239. See also Landlords
Index
Army, 101, 128, 130-31, 145, 152, 176,
177, 178, 189, 194, 201, 205, 210, 211,
214-16, 219, 221; billeting of, 146,
185; private, 180, 184, 216
Artisans, 74, 84, 145, 156, 157, 160,
161, 162, 170, 185, 221, 237
Ash, Roberta, 41, 42
Ashenfelter, Orley, 33-35
Aske, Robert, 153
Assassination, 189
Assembly, assemblies, 74, 101, 103,
137, 168, 170, 171, 183, 225
Association, associations, 81, 83, 101,
132, 167, 187, 188, 241, 242
Australia, 65, 104, 187
Austria, 161
Authority, authorities, 37, 38, 117, 174,
180, 183, 186. See also'Government;
Public officials
Bastille, fall of, 237
Belgium, 161, 165, 187
Beliefs, belief systems, 8-10, 15, 21,
22-23, 24, 37-38, 40, 43, 48, 59, 60,
235
Berce, Yves-Marie, 146-47, 233
Berlin, 181
Bienen, Henry, 174
Black Act of 1723, 102
337