n n
Reg 4 Every operator shall take all measures necessary to prevent major accidents and limit their consequences to persons and the environment
Part1-The purposes referred to in Reg7 are as follows: 2. Demonstrating that major accidents hazards have been identified and that the necessary measures have been taken to prevent such accidents and to limit their consequencesfor persons and the environment.
SAFETY REPORTS
n
Reg 7(7)
n
The operator shall send to the CA a report containing information which is sufficient for the purposes specified in Part 1 Schedule 4 and comprising at least the information specified in part 2 of that Schedule
Identification and accidental risk analysis and prevention methods: n detailed description of the possible major accident scenarios n and their probability ----------Bang!
Existing Guidance
n
4(b)assessment of the extent and severity of the consequences of identified major accidents
n n
(R2P2 p76)
HSE has produced a suite of guidance documents concerning ALARP. These are designed to give high level principles which D/Ds can then use to promulgate sector specific advice. The documents are: Reducing Risk, Protecting People (R2P2);
ALARP in COMAH
Principles and guidelines to assist HSE in its judgments that duty-holders have reduced risk as low as reasonably practicable; Assessing compliance with the law in individual cases and the use of good practice; and ALARP in Design - Policy and Guidance.
ALARP Demonstration
"Reducing Risks, Protecting People"
informs *
'R2P2'
informs ** HSE's expectation e.g. TOR framework, primacy of Good Practice, tolerability criteria
'ALARP
Principles and Guidelines'
Information to Stakeholders
'Good Practice'
'Design'
D/Ds' Guidance
Guidance to Staff
".... suitable controls must be in place place to to address all significant significant hazards hazards .... .... and and those controls, at a minimum, must implement authoritative good practice practice irrespective of situation-based risk estimates ...." ...."
"authoritative "authoritative good good practice" practice" = prescriptive legislation, ACOPs, guidance guidance produced produced by by government. government.
* Annex 3 of R2P2 reflects the ALARP guidance ** e.g. the concept of 'hypothetical person' set out in R2P2 is adopted in the ALARP guidance
ALARP Demonstration
HSE framework for the tolerability of risk
ALARP Diagram
A L A R P P rin c iple
Mea as su ur re es s tto or re ed du c e r i s k m u s t b e t a k e n u n t il th e r i s k i s b r o a d ly acceptable (BA) or u n til th e c o s t o f f u r t h e r r i s k reduction wou u lld d b e g r o s s ly disproportionate (GD) to t th he e reduction in risk that w o u ld be achieved.
Unacceptable region
Level of risk cannot be justified except in extraordinary circumstances.
Solicitor`s guidance "We believe it is right that, in all cases, the judgment as to whether measures are grossly disproportionate should reflect societal risk, that is to say, large numbers of people (employees or the public) being killed at one go. "
Case Specific ALARP demonstration Operator has to answer the following fundamental question:
Proportionate Risk Assessment The depth of the analysis in the operators report should be proportionate to a) the nature and scale of the MAHs b) the risks posed to neighbouring populations
BLEVE
if the measure appears reasonable and it cannot be shown that the cost of the measure is grossly disproportionate to the benefit to be gained, then the Operator is duty bound to implement implement that measure
Risk estimation
Selection of a representative set of events Estimation of consequences and frequency for each event Ranking & screening (e.g risk matrix, fn curves)
n
ALARP Demonstration
But the higher the installation lies on the societal concerns scale the greater the need to look for additional measures, over and above the normal standards. How to approach?
n n
1. Identify risk reduction measures. 2. Assess using Lines Of Defence analysis with cost estimates 3. Possibly, in extreme cases, add a Cost Benefit Analysis.
Intolerable
Unlikely 10-4-10-2
Intolerable
Intolerable
Intolerable
Tolerable if ALARP
TIFALARP
TIFALARP
TIFALARP/Int olerable
TIFALARP/Int olerable
Intolerable
Gross Disproportion
Remote 10-6-10-8
Broadly Acceptable
Broadly Acceptable
TIFALARP
TIFALARP
Single Fatality
2-10 Fatalities
11-50 Fatalities
50-100 Fatalities
100+ Fatalities
`So what`
If all the risks are BA then compliance with good practice demonstrates ALARP Otherwise the events that contribute significantly to the risks need to be identified, risk reduction options compiled,and appropriate decision aids used (eg LOPA for simple cases CBA for more difficult ones)
Purpose of SR is to demonstrate ANMs (ALARP) from an activity (`risk from what`) Four combinations (`risk of what` and `risk to what`): 1 IR to those on-site 2 IR to those off-site 3 SR to those on-site 4 SR to those off-site
If AMNs are in place for each major accident scenario then there is nothing more that can be done and professional judgement will suffice. `Explicit` detailed quantification of risks is not necessary unless the proportionality is high