■ Recovery of phosphorus.
Lime 70 120
500 lbs/d Process Ca(OH) 2 N2 CO2
ADDED
40
6 7 20 Test #1 Model #1
VFA ANAEROBIC + AEROBIC = BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL
TESTING GRAVITY
10
Lab Data
20
Test #2
Test #3
Model #2
Model #3
the tank?
P + Mg THICKENING
CENTRIFUGE PREDICTED FULL-PLANT IMPACTS
■ Production of ammonia? ■ Appears to be an upper limit on impact that VFAs can have on phosphorus release rates.
LOW P + Mg
CAKE
■ Impact on downstream processes? ■ Release rates anticipated using existing tankage will be adequate for phosphorus and magnesium
■ Can it be modeled with commer- release using WASSTRIP.
©Copyright, Black & Veatch Corporation, 2009. All rights reserved. The Black & Veatch name and logo are registered trademarks of Black & Veatch Holding Company. Other service marks and trademarks may be registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective companies.
PRIMARY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION REDUCED STRUVITE
CHEMICAL SLUDGE
90% PHOSPHATE REMOVED
O S TA R A BACTERIA FERMENTS OR BREAKS DOWN THIS MATERIAL
20% AMMONIA REMOVED
0.006 0.0012
250 40
Mg Release per L of WAS, mg
MAGNESIUM
33% REDUCTION IN
DEWATERING
200
MAGNESIUM COSTS
CENTRIFUGE BIOSOLIDS
30 CENTRATE HIGH AMMONIA 0.004 0.0008
VSS, hr -1
VSS, hr -1
CRYSTAL GREEN AND PHOSPHORUS
o-PO4 ®
0.001
0.0004
0.0002
12% INCREASE
50
10
5
75 mg VFA / L RAS 186 mg VFA / L RAS
NEXT STEPS 0.000 0.0000
IN STRUVITE
■ Determine the overall impact to the treatment plant. ■ Impacts from pH.
374 mg VFA / L RAS 571 mg VFA / L RAS
0 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
GENERATION
■ Overall economics. ■ Impact on Dewaterability.
0 24 48 72 96 120 0 50 100 150 200 Phosphorus Release
VFA / VSS Magnesium Release
Time, hours Time, min