N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPOSITE
MATERIALS
Ibrahim Miskioglu
MEEM Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
Keywords: Composite materials, fiber reinforced polymers, material characterization.
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Basics of Composite Materials
2.1. Constitutive Relationships
2.1.1. Constitutive Relationships for a Unidirectional Lamina
2.1.2. Constitutive Relationships for a Laminate
3. Characterization of Composite Material Properties
3.1. Constituent Properties
3.1.1. Fiber Properties
3.1.2. Matrix Properties
3.2. Lamina Properties
3.2.1. Lamina Tensile Properties
3.2.2. Lamina Compressive Properties
3.2.3. Lamina Shear Properties
3.2.4. Lamina Flexural Properties
3.3. Lamina Hygrothermal Properties
3.3.1. Lamina Thermal Expansion Coefficients
3.3.2. Lamina Moisture Expansion Coefficients
3.4. Interlaminar Testing
3.4.1. Interlaminar Shear Strength
3.4.2. Fracture Tests
3.5 Testing of Sandwich Composites
3.5.1. Shear Properties of Sandwich Core Material
3.5.2. Flexural Properties of Sandwich Composite Construction
3.5.3. Flexural Properties of Sandwich Composite Plate
4. Conclusion
Glossary
Bibliography
Biographical Sketch
Summary
Composite materials (Fiber Reinforced Polymers) offer light weight and high
stiffness/strength. Due to these attributes their use in structural applications has
increased dramatically practically at every length scale. A successful design and
analysis of a composite structure requires knowledge of the material properties such as
strength and stiffness. Material properties are determined in general by experimental
methods. In the event the material properties of the composite are determined by
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
micromechanics models utilizing the properties of the constituents, then experimental
determination of the constituent properties and experimental verification of the material
property is required. As a background, a brief introduction to the mechanics of
composite materials is presented which is then followed by the discussion of the
experimental methods to determine the basic properties of a typical fiber reinforced
polymer.
1. Introduction
Lightweight structures that meet even exceed the performance and safety requirements
in the strictest sense are gaining more importance. Fiber reinforced polymer composites
have been shown to perform successfully in many structural applications, and it is
expected their use will increase further in the upcoming years.
A typical composite material consists of at least two distinct phases when combined
offer advantages which cannot be offered by any one of its constituents alone. A
composite material is sought after when lightweight structures are needed with
sufficient strength and stiffness. Application of composite materials can be found from
aerospace, marine, automotive areas to biomedical implants.
Composite materials fall into the general category of anisotropic materials, for which
the material properties exhibit directional characteristics. On the other hand the most
common engineering materials such as steel etc., are considered isotropic for which
there is no dependence of material properties on direction. Isotropic materials can be
characterized by two independent material constants only, but for anisotropic materials
the number of constants can be as high as 21depending on the number of planes of
material symmetry the material possesses.
2. Basics of Composite Materials
2.1. Constitutive Relationships
The constitutive relationship for the anisotropic materials is obtained through
generalized Hookes Law and is expressed as
kl ijkl ij
C = ) 3 , 2 , 1 , , , ( = l k j i (1)
And
kl ijkl ij
S = ) 3 , 2 , 1 , , , ( = l k j i (2)
where
ij
and
ij
are stress and strain tensors respectively,
ijkl
C is the stiffness matrix
and
ijkl
S is the compliance matrix.
Generalized Hookes Law can also be expressed in terms of contracted notation as
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
j ij i
C = ( 6 ,..., 2 , 1 , = j i ) (3)
and
j ij i
S = ( 6 ,..., 2 , 1 , = j i ) (4)
This notation is obtained by letting
1 11
=
1 11
=
2 22
=
2 22
=
3 33
=
3 33
= (5)
23 4 4 23
= = =
4 23 23
2 = =
31 5 5 31
= = =
5 31 31
2 = =
12 6 6 12
= = =
6 12 12
2 = =
and
11 1111
C C = ,
12 1122
C C = ;
13 1133
C C = ;
14 1123
2C C = ;
15 1131
2C C = ;
16 1112
2C C = ; etc.
Both stiffness and compliance matrices are symmetric and the compliance matrix is the
inverse of the stiffness matrix. These matrices contain 81 elastic constants which reduce
to 36 due to the symmetry of stress and strain tensors and further reduce to 21 due to the
symmetry of stiffness and compliance matrices. Hence for a general anisotropic
material a total of 21 elastic constants are needed to fully characterize the material.
Materials may exhibit planes of material symmetry which in turn reduces the number of
elastic constants needed to characterize the material. The direction perpendicular to the
plane of material symmetry is known as the principal material axes. Based on the
number of planes of material symmetry that a material possesses, the materials are
classified as follows:
Monoclinic materials: These materials contain one plane of material symmetry and
the number of elastic constants needed is 13.
Orthotropic materials: Two mutually orthogonal planes of material symmetry exist
and the number of elastic constants needed to characterize the material reduces to nine.
Note that if there are two planes of material symmetry, then a third plane of material
symmetry exists which is mutually orthogonal to the other two.
Transversely isotropic materials: These materials have one plane of symmetry and the
number of elastic constants reduces to five.
Isotropic materials: Every plane is a plane of material symmetry and only two elastic
constants are needed to characterize the material.
The fiberreinforced polymers (FRP) are in general considered as orthotropic or
transversely isotropic. The higher stiffness composites manufactured from
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
unidirectional lamina are orthotropic and the short fiber composites are in general
transversely isotropic. In this chapter the emphasis will be on the experimental
characterization of the unidirectional composites. The methods that will be presented
are based on the testing standards specified by American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM).
For an orthotropic material the stressstrain relationship with respect to its principal
material directions is
6
5
4
3
2
1
66
55
44
33 32 31
23 22 21
13 12 11
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
C
C
C
C C C
C C C
C C C
(6)
or
6
5
4
3
2
1
66
55
44
33 32 31
23 22 21
13 12 11
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
S
S
S
S S S
S S S
S S S
(7)
The compliance terms in terms of the engineering constants are expressed as
1
11
1
E
S =
1
12
2
21
21 12
E E
S S
= = =
2
22
1
E
S =
1
13
3
31
31 13
E E
S S
= = =
(8)
3
33
1
E
S =
2
23
3
32
32 23
E E
S S
= = =
23
44
1
G
S =
13
55
1
G
S =
12
66
1
G
S =
where
i
E ( ) 3 , 2 , 1 = i are the moduli of elasticity associated with the principal material
directions,
ij
) 3 , 2 , 1 , ( = j i are the Poissons ratio (e.g.
1 2 12
= is obtained from a
uniaxial test when the applied stress is in the 1direction), and
j i
G
,
) 3 , 2 , 1 , ( = j i are the
shear moduli associated with the planeij .
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
Hygrothermal strains due to change in moisture and temperature can be evaluated as
c T
MT
MT
MT
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
(9)
where T is the change in temperature, c is the change in moisture content,
i
) 3 , 2 , 1 ( = i are the thermal expansion coefficients and
i
) 3 , 2 , 1 ( = i are the moisture
expansion coefficients. Note that the shear strains are zero due to the hygrothermal
effects.
2.1.1. Constitutive Relationships for a Unidirectional Lamina
The building block in a typical laminated composite is the unidirectional lamina. Once a
unidirectional lamina is characterized, then the properties of laminates with different
architecture can be deduced relatively easily.
The thickness of a unidirectional lamina is very small compared to its inplane
dimensions, hence for all practical purposes a state of plane stress can be assumed. If
0
3
= , 0
4 23
= = and 0
5 13
= = then the stress strain relations reduce to
6
2
1
66
22 12
12 11
6
2
1
0 0
0
0
Q
Q Q
Q Q
(10)
6
2
1
66
22 12
12 11
6
2
1
0 0
0
0
S
S S
S S
(11)
where
ij
Q are the reduced stiffness coefficients and they are given by
21 12
1
33
13 13
11 11
1
= =
E
C
C C
C Q
21 12
2 12
21 12
1 21
33
23 13
12 12
1 1
= =
E E
C
C C
C Q
(12)
21 12
2
33
23 23
22 22
1
= =
E
C
C C
C Q
12 66 66
G C Q = =
The compliance terms
ij
S are as before given by Eqs. (8).
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
2.1.1.1 Transformation of StressStrain Relationships for Unidirectional Lamina
If the lamina is loaded in a direction other than the principal material directions, it is
more advantages to express the stressstrain relationship with respect to a coordinate
system more suitable to handle the problem in hand.
Consider that the xy coordinate system is oriented with respect to the principal axes 12
as shown in Figure 1. Then the stresses in the 12 and xy coordinate systems are related
to each other through
1
2
6
xx
yy
xy
=
T with
2 2
2 2
2 2
2
2
m n mn
n m mn
mn mn m n
=
T (13)
and
1
1
2
6
xx
yy
xy
=
T where
2 2
1 2 2
2 2
2
2
m n mn
n m mn
mn mn m n
=
T (14)
Figure 1. Coordinate system for transformation between the principal material axes and
the xy coordinate system
Note that
1
T is the inverse of the transformation matrix T and, ) cos( = m and
) sin( = n .
The strain transformations can be achieved through the use of the transformation matrix
and/or its inverse, e.g.
1
2
1 1
6 2 2
xx
yy
xy
=
T and
1
1
2
1 1
6 2 2
xx
yy
xy
=
T (15)
Using the transformation relationships Eqs. (12)(14) together with Eq. (10) we can
write
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
11 12
1
12 22
1
66 2
0
0
0 0 2
xx xx
yy yy
xy xy
Q Q
Q Q
Q
=
T T (16)
which is reduced to
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
Q Q Q
Q Q Q
Q Q Q
66 62 61
26 22 21
16 12 11
(17)
where
66
2 2
12
2 2
22
4
11
4
11
4 2 Q n m Q n m Q n Q m Q + + + =
66
2 2
12
2 2
22
4
11
4
22
4 2 Q n m Q n m Q m Q n Q + + + =
66
2 2
12
4 4
22
2 2
11
2 2
12
4 ) ( Q n m Q n m Q n m Q n m Q + + + = (18)
66
3 3
12
3 3
22
3
11
3
16
) ( 2 ) ( Q n m mn Q n m mn Q mn nQ m Q + + =
66
3 3
12
3 3
22
3
11
3
26
) ( 2 ) ( Q mn n m Q mn n m nQ m Q mn Q + + =
66
2 2 2
12
2 2
22
2 2
11
2 2
66
) ( 2 Q n m Q n m Q n m Q n m Q + + =
Note that in the xy coordinate system, although the material is orthotropic, this is not
evident from Eq. (17) since the transformed stiffness matrix
ij
Q has all nonzero
coefficients, the same as an anisotropic material. The coefficients given in Eq. (18) are
not independent; they are all functions of the four lamina stiffnesses with respect to the
principal material axes.
Alternatively the strains are expressed in the xy coordinate system as
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
S S S
S S S
S S S
66 61 61
26 22 21
16 12 11
(19)
where the transformed lamina compliances
ij
S are
66
2 2
12
2 2
22
4
11
4
11
2 S n m S n m S n S m S + + + =
66
2 2
12
2 2
22
4
11
4
22
2 S n m S n m S m S n S + + + =
66
2 2
12
4 4
22
2 2
11
2 2
12
) ( S n m S n m S n m S n m S + + + =
66
3 3
12
3 3
22
3
11
3
16
) ( ) ( 2 2 S n m mn S n m mn S mn nS m S + + = (20)
66
3 3
12
3 3
22
3
11
3
26
) ( ) ( 2 2 S mn n m S mn n m nS m S mn S + + =
66
2 2 2
12
2 2
22
2 2
11
2 2
66
) ( 8 4 4 S n m S n m S n m S n m S + + =
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
In terms of engineering constants, the stress strain relationship becomes
xy
yy
xx
xy y xy y x xy x
xy y xy y x xy
xy x xy y yx x
xy
yy
xx
G E E
G E E
G E E
1
1
1
, ,
,
,
(21)
From the symmetry of the compliance matrix we get
y
xy y
xy
y xy
x
xy x
xy
x xy
y
yx
x
xy
E G
E G
E E
, ,
, ,
=
=
=
(22)
The engineering constants are determined from simple uniaxial tests. For example if
0
xx
and all the other stress components are zero, then
xx xx x
E = is the modulus
of elasticity associated with the xdirection,
xx yy xy
= is the Poissons ratio, and
xx xy xy x
=
,
is the shear coupling coefficient. Likewise if 0
yy
and all the other
stress components are zero, then
yy yy y
E = is the modulus of elasticity associated
with the ydirection,
yy xx yx
= , and
yy xy xy y
=
,
, and if 0
xy
and all the
other stress components are zero, then
xy xy xy
G = is the shear modulus associated
with the xy directions,
xy xx x xy
=
,
and,
xy yy y xy
=
,
.
2.1.2. Constitutive Relationships for a Laminate
Composite materials are used by forming a laminate from individual lamina. Each
lamina is thin and may have different fiber orientation and in some cases may have
different materials (see Figure 2). The response of the laminates to loads depends on the
properties, fiber orientation and stacking sequence of its layers. Two laminates
composed of identical lamina, with the same thickness will respond to loads differently
if laminae are arranged differently. Analysis of laminates is mostly restricted to flat
panels with limited discussion on curved laminates which can be found in textbooks on
mechanics of composite materials.
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
Figure 2. Laminated structure
Analysis of flat laminates under inplane and bending loads are based on the Kirchoff
Love hypothesis. Assuming that all layers are perfectly bonded (no slippage between
the layers), Kirchoff hypothesis state that a line perpendicular to geometric midsurface
(reference plane) remains straight and does not change its length while the laminate is
deforming under the applied loading. This hypothesis results in 0 =
zz
, 0 = =
yz xz
.
Then the strain distribution in the laminate is expressed by
xy
y
x
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
z
0
0
0
(23)
where z is measured from the geometric midsurface as shown in Figure 3. The strain
components
0 0 0
, ,
xy yy xx
are the strains of the geometric midsurface (reference plane) and
xy y x
, , are the bending curvatures of the reference plane in the xz, yz and xy planes
respectively.
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
Figure 3. Laminate with coordinate notation for individual lamina
Determination of the force,
xy y x
N N N , , and moment,
xy y x
M M M , , resultants yields
the following constitutive relationships
xy
y
x
xy
y
x
xy
y
x
B B B
B B B
B B B
A A A
A A A
A A A
N
N
N
66 26 16
26 22 12
16 12 11
0
0
0
66 26 16
26 22 12
16 12 11
(24)
xy
y
x
xy
y
x
xy
y
x
D D D
D D D
D D D
B B B
B B B
B B B
M
M
M
66 26 16
26 22 12
16 12 11
0
0
0
66 26 16
26 22 12
16 12 11
(25)
where
) (
1
1
=
=
k k
n
k
ij ij
h h Q A
, 1,2,6 (Extensional Stiffness) i j =
) (
2
1
2
1
2
=
k k ij ij
h h Q B , 1,2,6 (Coupling Stiffness) i j =
) (
3
1
3
1
3
=
k k ij ij
h h Q D , 1,2,6 (Bending Stiffness) i j =
If temperature and moisture change is considered, then the force and moment results are
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
MT
1 1
1 1
( ) ( )
n n
k k k k
xy ij xy k k ij xy k k
k k
h h T h h c
= =
= +
N Q Q (26)
MT 2 2 2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
( ) ( )
2 2
n n
k k k k
xy ij xy k k ij xy k k
k k
h h T h h c
= =
= +
M Q Q (27)
and these can be superimposed to the force and moment resultants given in Eqs. (24)
and (25).
Loaddeformation relationships can be inverted to express strains and curvatures in
terms of loads and moments, i.e.,
0
0
0
xx x x
yy y y
xy xy xy
N M
N M
N M
= +
A B (28)
x x x
y y y
xy xy xy
N M
N M
N M
= +
C D (29)
where the matrices A , B , C and D are computed as
1 * 1 *
=
*
A A B D C
* 1
*
B = B D
* 1 *
= C D C
* 1
= D D
with
* 1
= B A B
* 1
= C BA
* 1
= D D BA B
it should be noted that B C
What are given above are the main constitutive equations for a single lamina and
laminates. More detailed analysis of lamina and laminates can be found in the textbooks
on mechanics of composite materials.
3. Characterization of Composite Material Properties
A lamina is the main building block of a laminate, and the properties of a lamina along
with the stacking sequence of the lamina are used to predict the response of laminates to
loading. These predictions need the basic properties of the constituents of the lamina
and the lamina itself. Constituent properties are needed to design the lamina through
micromechanical models that relate the constituent properties to the property of a
lamina. Of course experimental measurement of properties is needed at both the
constituent and lamina levels.
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)



TO ACCESS ALL THE 33 PAGES OF THIS CHAPTER,
Visit: http://www.eolss.net/EolsssampleAllChapter.aspx
Bibliography
Adams D.F. (2005). A comparison of shear test methods. High Performance Composites, 13(5), 910. [A
summary of shear test methods is presented]
Adams D.F., Carlsson L.A., Pipes R.B. (2003). Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite
Materials, Third Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA [A comprehensive guide to for
characterization of composites materials]
ASTM Standards (2008), Volume 8.01, Plastics (I), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
[ASTM Standards volumes where the standards mentioned in the text can be found]
ASTM Standards (2008), Volume 8.03, Plastics (III), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA,
USA
ASTM Standards (2008), Volume 15.01, Refractories: Activated Carbon; Advanced Ceramics, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
ASTM Standards (2008), Volume 15.03, Space Simulation; Aerospace and Aircraft; Composite
Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
Carlsson L.A., Gillespie, J r. J .W., Pipes R.B. (1986). On the analysis and design of the end notched
flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing, J. Composite Materials, 20, 594604. [Details f the ENF
specimen and mode II testing is discussed]
Daniel I.M., Ishai O. (2006). Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition, Oxford
University Press, NY, USA. [General reference for mechanics of composite materials]
Gibson R.F. (2006). Principles of Composite Material Mechanics, Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL, USA. [General reference for mechanics of composite materials]
Hojo M., Sawada Y., Miyairi H. (1994). Influence of clamping method on tensile properties of
unidirectional CFRP in 0 and 90 directionsround robin activity for international standardization in
J apan, Composites, 25(8), 786796. [Effect of the specimens with tapered and untapered tabs on tensile
properties is discussed]
Pagano N.J ., Halpin J .C. (1968). Influence of end constraint in the testing of anisotropic bodies, Journal
of Composite Materials, 2, 1831. [Influence of clamping the offaxis tensile specimen on the state of the
stress is discussed]
Tsai C.L., Daniel I.M. (1994). Method for Thermomechanical Characterization of Single Fibers,
Composites Sci. and Technol. 50, 712. [Details of the fixture shown on Figure 5 and the corresponding
test method is discussed]
Tsai C.L., Wooh, S.C. (2001). Hygric characterization of woven glass/epoxy composites, Experimental
Mechanics, 41(1), 7076. [Measurement of moisture expansion coefficients using transverse deflection of
an axially constrained specimen is discussed]
Walrath D.E., Adams D.F. (1983). The Iosipescu shear test as applied to composite materials,
U
N
E
S
C
O
E
O
L
S
S
S
A
M
P
L
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
S
EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS  Experimental Characterization of Composite Materials  IbrahimMiskioglu
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
Experimental Mechanics, 23(1), 105110. [Adaptation of the Iosipescu shear fixture to composites is
discussed]
Welsh J .R., Adams D.F. (1997). Current status of compression test methods for composite materials,
SAMPE Journal, 33(1) 3543. [A summary of compression test methods is presented]
Whitney, J .M., Daniel I.M., Pipes R.B. (1984). Experimental Mechanics of Fiber Reinforced Composite
Materials, rev. ed., Society for Experimental Mechanics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , USA. [Use
of strain gages for the determination of thermal expansion coefficients is presented]
Yaniv G., Perimanidis G., Daniel I.M. (1987). Method for Hygrothermal Characterization of
Graphite/Epoxy Composite, J. Composites Technology Research, 9, 2125. [Measurement of moisture
expansion coefficients using embedded strain gages is discussed]
Biographical Sketch
Ibrahim Miskioglu received his B.S. (1976) in mechanical engineering from Bogazici University, Istan
bul Turkey and M.S. (1978) from Mississippi State University in mechanical engineering, and Ph.D.
(1981) in engineering mechanics from Iowa State University.
He is an Associate Professor of Engineering Mechanics in the MEEM Department of Michigan
Technological University (MTU). He has served on the Executive Committee of the MEEM Department
as the Director of Solid Mechanics Area a number of times during his tenure at MTU. His current/ recent
research interests include: experimental stress analysis, composite materials, failure studies of random
fiber composites with applications to structural problems, study of equalchannel angular extrusion
(ECAE) of metallic alloys and material characterization by nanoindentation.
Dr. Miskioglu has been an active member of Society for Experimental Mechanics since 1979. He has
served as the Vice Chair/Chair of Application Committee between 1989 and 1995, and as an Executive
Board Member between 1999 and 2001. He has also served as the Associate Editor/Editor of
Experimental Techniques between 1991 and 1997.