9ight
'o or "o( density of industries or houses$
%gricu"ture or mountain areas
9ocations at "east 10 to 20 km from the sea
1* 2?
8edium
ndustries not producing particu"ar"y
po""uting smoke$
;igh density of houses and7or industries but
sub0ected to freDuent (inds and7or rainfa""
Wind from the sea but not too c"ose to the
coasts
20 =,
;ea&y
;igh density of industries and suburbs of
"arge cities# producing po""ution$
%reas c"ose to the sea$
2, ::
E
Eery hea&y
ndustria" smoke producing conducti&e
deposits
%reas &ery c"ose to the sea and e<posed to
sea+spray @sa"tB
Desert areas$
=1 ,:
!/6/</2 &ir c'earances
2ecommendations for se"ection of air c"earance distance are found in I51,J$ 8inimum c"earances ha&e
been determined for different e"ectrode configurations$ The minimum c"earances specified are determined
(ith a conser&ati&e approach# taking into account practica" e<perience# economy# and si6e of practica"
eDuipment in the range be"o( 1m c"earance$ These c"earances are intended so"e"y to address insu"ation
coordination reDuirements$ Safety reDuirements may resu"t in substantia""y "arger c"earances$
Tab"e 5 $.# taken from I51,J# sha"" be used for phase+to+phase and phase+to+earth insu"ation for (hich
"ightning impu"se (ithstand &o"tage is defined$
Tab"e 5 $? and Tab"e 5 $-# taken from I51,J# sha"" be used for phase+to+earth and phase+to+phase
insu"ation for (hich s(itching impu"se (ithstand &o"tage is defined$
Aor se"ection of proper air c"earance across insu"ation paths (here on"y %C &o"tage (ithstand reDuirement
app"y# e$g$ for p"atform mounted eDuipment# the recommendations in I51,J# sha"" be used$ 8inimum air
c"earance &ersus %C+(ithstand according to Aigure 5 $- sha"" app"y if no other more detai"ed reDuirements
are specified$
#a('e !/74 orre'ation (et+een standard 'i,htnin, i$pu'se +ithstand 1o'ta,es and
$ini$u$ air c'earances/
@Arom I51,JB
Standard 9ightning mpu"se
Eo"tage @kE+crestB
8inimum C"earance @mmB
2od Structure Conductor Structure
20 *0
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
*=
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
:0 *0
*0 -0
., 120
-, 1*0
12, 220
1:, 2.0
1.0 =20
2,0 :?0
=2, *=0
:,0 -00
,,0 1100
*,0 1=00
.,0 1,00
?,0 1.00 1*00
-,0 1-00 1.00
10,0 2100 1-00
11., 2=,0 2200
1=00 2*00 2:00
1:2, 2?,0 2?00
1,,0 =100 2-00
1*., ==,0 =100
1?00 =*00 ==00
1-,0 =-00 =*00
2100 :200 =-00
'1T!C The standard "ightning impu"se is app"icab"e to phase to phase and phase to earth$
Aor phase to earth# the minimum c"earance for conductor+structure and rod+structure is app"icab"e$
Aor phase to phase# the minimum c"earance for rod structure is app"icab"e$
#a('e !/@4 orre'ation (et+een standard s+itchin, i$pu'se +ithstand 1o'ta,es and
$ini$u$ phase7to7earth air c'earances
@Arom I51,JB
Standard S(itching mpu"se
Eo"tage @kE+crestB
8inimum C"earance @mmB
Conductor Structure 2od Structure
.,0 1*00 1-00
?,0 1?00 2:00
-,0 2200 2-00
10,0 2*00 =:00
11., =100 :100
1=00 =*00 :?00
1:2, :200 ,*00
1,,0 :-00 *:00
#a('e !/94 orre'ation (et+een standard s+itchin, i$pu'se +ithstand 1o'ta,es and
$ini$u$ phase7to7phase air c'earances
@Arom I51,JB
Standard s(itching impu"se (ithstand &o"tage
@kE+crestB
8inimum phase+to+phase c"earance
@mmB
Phase+to+earth
kE
Phase+to+phase
&a"ue
Phase+to+phase
kE
Conductor+
conductor para""e"
2od+conductor
Phase+to+earth
&a"ue
.,0 1$, 112, 2=00 2*00
?,0 1$, 12., 2*00 =100
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
*:
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
?,0 1$* 1=*0 2-00 =:00
-,0 1$, 1:2, =100 =*00
-,0 1$. 1*1, =.00 :=00
10,0 1$, 1,., =*00 :200
10,0 1$* 1*?0 =-00 :*00
11., 1$, 1.*= :200 ,000
1=00 1$. 2210 *100 .:00
1:2, 1$. 2:2= .200 -000
1,,0 1$* 2:?0 .*00 -:00
Fi,ure !/9 7 &ir c'earance 1ersus &7+ithstand
The re"ationship bet(een %C (ithstand &o"tage @VPFW# in kE28SB and minimum air c"earances @dAI,# in mmB
is summari6ed by !Duation : be"o( @based on assuming %C (ithstand 28S &o"tage is -0N7sDrtI2J of the
,0N breakdo(n peak &o"tage and so"&ing !Duation G$1 of I51,J for dBC
,
_
,
_
1
]
1
,, $ 0
1
*.,
e<p "n
e<p ?==
PFW
AI,
V
d
EAuation 5
Aor EPAW "ess than =00kE28S# !Duation , be"o( can be used @"inear appro<imation of !Duation : &a"id for
this &o"tage rangeBC
PFW AI,
V d = $ = 20 +
EAuation <
!Duation : and !Duation , can be used for air c"earances on the series capacitor p"atform# but it is not
genera""y app"icab"e for &erification of a"" other air c"earances in the substation$
!/6/6 Dischar,e current 'i$itin, and da$pin, eAuip$ent9 see 'ause 9/6
!/6/7 !%pass s+itches9 see 'ause 9/7
!/6/7/1 #ransient reco1er% 1o'ta,e =#B.> of (%pass s+itch durin, (an" insertion
Since the operating mechanism of a bypass s(itch is re&ersed as compared to a "ine breaker# in most cases
@e$g$ s(itches (ith a spring mechanica" storage mechanism (i"" charge the c"osing spring (hen openingB
the speed of separating contacts during s(itch opening is s"o(er than the speed of con&erging contacts
during s(itch c"osing$ 5ecause of this# their T2E Ken&e"opeL# or the capabi"ity of separating contacts not
to restrike after "oad+current break @note that bypass s(itches are not reDuired to break fau"t currentsHnor
is it desirous that they be designed to do soB# is not as good @in terms of time# but not ma<imum &o"tageB as
their "ine breaker counterparts$
5ypass s(itches shou"d be ab"e to break a specific "ine current @kno(n as Kinsertion currentLB and not
restrike in the process$ Since a bypass s(itch# by opening# inserts the ASC bank# the T2E is (e""+
contro""ed by both the para""e" capacitor @dE7dtB as (e"" as the 81E @peak kEB$ 2udimentary T2E studies
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
*,
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
can be performed# ho(e&er a Duick ana"ysis may be sufficient to determine (hether a gi&en set of T2E
type tests are acceptab"e to sho( the bypass s(itch is capab"e of being app"ied in a specific ASC bank$
2eco&ery &o"tage across an opening bypass s(itch can be estimated using the fo""o(ing informationC
VTT peak &o"tage at (hich T2E type testing (as performed
tTT time to ma<imum &o"tage VTT (hen type testing (as performed
- bank capacitance
f system po(er freDuency
AP peak insertion current
V.$V peak &o"tage of 81E assemb"y at AP current through it
Gi&en the type test pair of &a"ues @VTT and tTTB# (e can conser&ati&e"y estimate the T2E Ken&e"opeL# VTE@tB#
(ith !Duation *C
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TE
V
t
t
V
t t
t t
t V
,
_
< <
0
B @
EAuation 6
The T2E can be estimated first by assuming there is no 81E using !Duation .C
( ) [ ]
[ ]
f
t
f-
A
t V
ft
f-
A
t V
.A/
P
.A/
P
2
1
(hen # B @ ma<
2 cos 1
2
B @
EAuation 7
f V@t.A/B is eDua" to or "ess than VTT# and t.A/ is eDua" to or greater than tTT# then there is no reason to
e&a"uate furtherHthe type test comfortab"y estab"ishes the capabi"ity of the gi&en s(itch in the app"ication$
f# ho(e&er V@t.A/B is greater than VTT# or t.A/ is "ess than tTT# then further ana"ysis is reDuired# taking into
account the 81E$ @'ote that this assumes that V.$V is "ess than V@t.A/B$ f it is greater# then chances are
that ne( type tests need to be performed# or a different design bypass s(itch (ith a greater T2E capabi"ity
needs to be used in this app"ication$B
The simp"est (ay to mode" the 81E in this situation is to assume that the 81E does not conduct (hen
V@tB is "ess than V.$V# and is conducting a"" of the insertion current at a constant V.$V (hen conducting that
current through the capacitor (ou"d ha&e taken the bank &o"tage abo&e V.$V$
Since V.$V is "ess than VTT @by our ear"ier assumptionB# (e need to find at (hich time reco&ery &o"tage
e<ceeds the T2E Ken&e"opeL# or (hen it hits V.$V# (hich e&er occurs first$
/sing !Duation ? be"o(# (e can find at (hat time the T2E Ken&e"opeL e<ceeds V.$VC
TT
.$V
TT E+V
V
V
t t
EAuation @
/sing !Duation . be"o(# (e can find the time at (hich 81E conduction occursC
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
**
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
[ ]
1
]
1
P
.$V
.$V
.$V .$V
P
A
f-V
f
t
V ft
f-
A
2
1 cos
2
1
B 2 cos@ 1
2
1
EAuation 9
f tE+V is eDua" to or "ess than t.$V# then the T2E type test is acceptab"e# and the bypass s(itch# as designed#
can be app"ied to the ASC bank from the perspecti&e of T2E$
%s an e<amp"e# consider the fo""o(ing bypass s(itch in re"ation to its app"icationC
VTT =0,kE+crest
tTT *$=ms
- .?$2A
f *0;6
AP .*=.%+crest
V.$V =00kE+crest at .*=.%+crest
%t t.A/ U ?$=ms# V@t.A/B U ,1?kEp @!Duation .B# (hich is greater than VTT$ The T2E Ken&e"opeL e<ceeds
V.$V at tE+V U *$2ms @!Duation ?B$ The 81E is in conduction at t.$V U :$*ms @!Duation -B$ Since tE+V is
greater than t.$V# then this bypass s(itch shou"d be reconsidered$ Some options to consider at this pointC
9o(er insertion current @APB rating$ n this e<amp"e# "o(ering AP from .*=.%+crest to around
,100%+crest (i"" "o(er V.$V a "itt"e# (hich (i"" "o(er tE+V$ t (i"" a"so raise t.$V to abo&e *$2ms$
9o(er V.$V$ n this e<amp"e# "o(ering V.$V from =00kE+crest to 1:0kE+crest "o(ers both tE+V
and t.$V to about 2$-ms$
2etest same design of bypass s(itch at a higher VTT and7or sma""er tTT$
/se a"ternate bypass s(itch design (ith a "arger# more capab"e interrupting chamber that has been
tested at a higher VTT and7or sma""er tTT$
Perform some more in&o"&ed T2E simu"ations using actua" system data to see if insertion
transient is not as arduous @from the perspecti&e of bypass s(itch T2EB as this conser&ati&e
assessment sho(s it to be$
Aigure 5 $10 5 $11 be"o( sho(s graphica""y the e<amp"e abo&e$
Fi,ure !/10 !/114Exa$p'e #B. &ssess$ent of !%pass S+itch
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
*.
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
!/6/@ Externa' (%pass disconnect s+itches9 see 'ause 9/@
!/6/9 Protection9 contro'9 and $onitorin,9 see 'ause 9/9
!/6/10 Stee' p'atfor$s9 support structures9 seis$ic desi,n reAuire$ents9 see 'ause 9/10
!/7 Spare parts and specia' too's9 see 'ause 10
!/@ En,ineerin, studies9 see 'ause 11
Care shou"d be taken (hen (riting this section to coordinate it (ith the scope sp"it Section ,$1 so as to
ensure no contradictions or confusion$ C"ause 11 is (ritten in a checkbo< format# for the user to se"ect the
te<t most consistent (ith their goa"s and p"ans for the pro0ect and modify it as necessary$ Typica"
reDuirements are sho(n$
n the case (here the user (ishes the series capacitor supp"ier to perform any or a"" of these studies# care
shou"d a"so be taken in specifying the time to comp"ete these studies# as the studies do affect one another$
Aor e<amp"e# the s(ing current# SS2# and T2E studies a"" ha&e the potentia" to "imit the range of the 81E
protecti&e "e&e" as (e"" as dri&e reDuirements for a gapped &ersus a gap"ess so"ution# and these kinds of
Duestions must be ans(ered before the 81E duty study is e&en started$ %"so# it is imperati&e that if the
supp"ier is to perform any of these studies# the po(er system information reDuired to do these studies needs
to be recei&ed &ery ear"yH(ithin a fe( days or a coup"e of (eeks of the a(ard of the pro0ectHand the
information must be fina" and not change during the study (ork# in order for this (ork to be comp"eted in a
time"y manner and not significant"y de"ay the pro0ect$ Aurther# (hen the supp"ier performs these studies it
reDuires the user to re&ie( and appro&e the study resu"ts and conc"usions# and unti" those appro&a"s are
recei&ed the supp"ier often cannot continue (ith design (ork$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
0
20000
100000
120000
200000
220000
100000
0
,
0
0
0
0
,
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
2
0
,
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
4
0
,
0
0
2
0
,
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
7
0
,
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
9
0
,
0
1
0
#i$e =Seconds>
.
o
'
t
a
,
e
=
.
o
'
t
s
>
.9: Strai*tline En-elpe
0ypass S(itch 9ec-ery :lta*e
*?
1
2
=
:
,
*
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
!/@/1 Po+er s%ste$ ana'%sis9 -0. reAuire$ents
The series capacitor 81E design dri&es reDuirements for e&ery other piece of eDuipment on the bank# and
it a"so has effects on system dynamic stabi"ity ana"ysis @see Section 11$1$2B# "ine breaker T2E @see Section
11$1$=B# SS2 transient torDue studies @see Section 11$1$:B# and sometimes the "ine protection re"aying
coordination studies @see section 11$1$,B$ Aor e<amp"e# the "ine breaker T2E study may conc"ude that
protecti&e "e&e" must be "imited to some ma<imum peak &o"tage &a"ue in order to mitigate the effect of the
trapped charge of the bank on nearby opening "ine breakers# and at the same time the dynamic stabi"ity
ana"ysis may reDuire the protecti&e "e&e" to be at some minimum &a"ue to a&oid e<cessi&e 81E conduction
during s(ing currents$ These sorts of interactions can @but do not necessari"yB ser&e to bracket the
a""o(ab"e 81E protecti&e "e&e" range# and shou"d be in&estigated before the 81E reDuirements study is
started$ 'ote a"so that kno(ing this range ahead of time a""o(s the user to proper"y fi"" in Section ?$1$
% 81E duty study genera""y consists of t(o steps$ The first step is to in&estigate and pinpoint the (orst+
case e<terna" fau"t duty in terms of peak 81E current# peak or 28S "ine current# and7or ma<imum 81E
energy absorbed$ The 81EPs are genera""y reDuired to Kride throughL a series of fau"ts e<terna" to the "ine
@fau"ts that are iso"ated (ithout deenergi6ing the "ine the series capacitor bank is compensatingB (ithout
being bypassed by a T%G or bypass s(itch$ The user shou"d carefu""y define these fau"ts based on "ine
protection schemes# and take into accountHfor the different kinds of fau"ts @sing"e+phase and mu"ti+phase
fau"tsBHho( "ong it takes for the "ine protection and breakers to iso"ate these fau"ts# ho( Duick"y the
attempted rec"osure into the same fau"t cou"d occur before "ockout# and ho( many of these fau"t seDuences
the bank must Kride throughL (ithout bypassing in a short period of time @in "ess than about *0 secondsB$
%fter the highest magnitude 81E peak currents# "ine peak or 28S currents# and7or 81E energy
absorption &a"ues are found for e<terna" fau"t duty# to these &a"ues a thresho"d margin is added @,N to 20N
is a typica" range for this marginB# and bypass thresho"ds are deri&ed such that the bank can monitor any or
a"" of these &a"ues to discern bet(een an e<terna" fau"t that must be Kridden throughL and an interna" fau"t
or an e<cessi&e e<terna" fau"t (here bank bypass is a""o(ed$ 'ote that in the case of primary protection
fai"ure @e$g$ stuck breakerB# backup protection (i"" deenergi6e a "arger part of the system that might inc"ude
the "ine being compensated# and in this case the fau"t no( becomes interna" and bypass (ou"d be a""o(ab"e$
With these thresho"ds# the second part of the duty study (ou"d in&estigate both c"ose+in and remote interna"
fau"ts# simu"ating the bank 81E and bypass system @T%G and7or bypass s(itchB (aiting for one or more
of the thresho"ds to be e<ceeded and then bypassing after some bypass de"ay time dependent on the bypass
techno"ogy being simu"ated$ Arom this part of the study is deri&ed the ma<imum e<pected 81E peak
current during any fau"t and the ma<imum e<pected 81E energy absorption for any fau"t$ The 81E
coordinating current @peak current through the 81E at protecti&e "e&e" &o"tageB must be eDua" to or greater
than the ma<imum e<pected 81E peak current# and the energy rating of the 81E must be eDua" to or
greater than the ma<imum e<pected 81E energy absorption$
n genera"# higher 81E protecti&e "e&e"s make the 81E "ess+sensiti&e to e<terna" fau"ts @though this is not
necessari"y true of shorter "ines and systems (ith strong short circuit strengthsB and a""o( for "o(er bypass
thresho"ds and fe(er 8> of energy reDuired# especia""y for banks (ith fast bypass de&ices such as triggered
air gaps or thyristors$ Aor s"o(er bypass de&ices such as bypass s(itches# "o(er protecti&e "e&e"s genera""y
produce sma""er energy absorptions for c"ose+in interna" fau"ts$ Gi&ing the bidders a (ide range of
protecti&e "e&e"s and the abi"ity to bid either gap"ess or gapped banks (i"" enab"e them to optimi6e their bid
based on their techno"ogy strengths$
n order to easi"y compare bids# it is often usefu" for the user to perform these studies ahead of time and
pro&ide the resu"ts to a"" bidders# reDuiring a"" bidders to bid to a specific protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage and 81E
energy rating and to specify gapped or gap"ess bypass designs$ This makes app"es+to+app"es comparisons
fair"y easy# but the tradeoff is that the bidders are not a""o(ed to optimi6e the 81E and bypass techno"ogy
design based on their strengths# for e<amp"e one bidder may ha&e a T%G that bypasses faster than others
and another bidder may ha&e a bypass s(itch that c"oses faster than others$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
*-
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
:2
:=
::
:,
:*
:.
:?
:-
,0
,1
,2
,=
,:
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
%n a"ternati&e is to pro&ide a"" bidders (ith a po(er system eDui&a"ent# a range of acceptab"e protecti&e
"e&e"s @based on other system ana"ysis# as stated beforeB# a choice to use any bypass de&ice techno"ogy they
deem optimum for the situation# and to ha&e a"" of the bidders perform a pre"iminary study as a part of the
proposa" process$ Whi"e this genera""y (i"" produce the optimi6ed bid for each bidder# e&a"uating the
studies (i"" be difficu"t# because you (i"" end up (ith &ery different ans(ers from a"" of the bidders$
%nother a"ternati&e is to perform these studies ahead of time and reDuire a"" bidders to bid to a specific
protecti&e "e&e" and energy rating to make the comparisons easy# and at the same time pro&ide the bidders
(ith the po(er system eDui&a"ent and other information so that they can perform their o(n study and
suggest ho( they (ou"d optimi6e the design based on the strengths of their techno"ogies$ n this case# they
(ou"d bid according to (hat is specified# but a"so sho( a price deduct for their optimi6ed so"ution$ This
kind of approach yie"ds the best of both (or"ds# but a"so reDuires the most (ork on the userPs part$
When pro&iding a system eDui&a"ent for bidders that (i"" enab"e them to perform their o(n studies as a part
of the proposa"# a series of benchmark fau"ts at each of the buses @S9GA as (e"" as =+phase fau"ts are
typica" benchmarksB that gi&e both current magnitude and impedance ang"e for a gi&en source &o"tage
magnitude is suggested in order to ensure a"" bidders are ab"e to bui"d a re"iab"e and consistent mode"$
8ost short circuit programs fai" to take into account the action of the 81E# so it is genera""y better to
benchmark an eDui&a"ent system (ith a"" banks bypassed rather than inserted$ Part of the bidder Ps study
(ou"d be to make sure their fau"t "e&e"s are consistent (ith the benchmarks$
System eDui&a"ents shou"d take into account future system gro(th# as much as is kno(n# or if not kno(n
the source eDui&a"ent impedances cou"d be reduced by some margin to account for une<pected future
additions that (ou"d increase short+circuit strength at a gi&en bus$
!/@/2 S%ste$ d%na$ic sta(i'it% ana'%sis9 s+in, currents
The primary purpose of a dynamic stabi"ity ana"ysis is to ensure that the "e&e" of series compensation is
sufficient to pro&ide system stabi"ity @&o"tage and freDuencyB at the desired po(er f"o($ This kind of study
shou"d ha&e been comp"eted# a"ong (ith po(er f"o( ana"ysis# before the "e&e" of compensation (as
se"ected and the resu"ts of these studies form the basis for ho( many 1hms and %mperes the series
capacitor bank is reDuired to ha&e$
n addition to this# the resu"ts of such a study (ou"d produce a (orst+case s(ing current through the series
capacitor bank$ The p"ot of this current @%28S as a function of time# o&er a 1 to 10 second s(ing periodB
(i"" a""o( the series capacitor bank supp"ier to ensure that the bank can Kride throughL the s(ing (ithout
bypassing and (ithout any eDuipment damage$ The "argest s(ing currents typica""y occur (hen there is a
fau"t on an ad0acent "ine and that "ine is deenergi6ed$ The bank that (i"" see the s(ing (i"" first e<perience
an e<terna" fau"t @see notes in pre&ious sectionB and then a s(ing transient immediate"y fo""o(ing$ f the
81E conducts significant"y during this s(ing transient# bypass thresho"ds cou"d be e<ceeded and the bank
(i"" bypass# and bypassing during the s(ing is perhaps the (orst time for a bank to bypass# from the
standpoint of system dynamic stabi"ity$
The user shou"d pro&ide to bidders either a current p"ot from this study that represents the (orst+case
system s(ing or pro&ide some other information such as ma<imum %mperes for a gi&en duration in order
to ensure the bidders can design the bank to accommodate this s(ing$
!/@/2 8ine (rea"er transient reco1er% 1o'ta,e =#B.> studies
n some interna" fau"ts# the series capacitor bank may Kride throughL the fau"t and not bypass$ %s the "ine
breakers open# typica""y at 6ero+current crossing# to iso"ate the fau"t the series capacitor bank (i"" retain a
trapped DC charge at about ?0+-0N of protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage$ This trapped charge can offset the T2E
en&e"ope of the opening "ine breakers and increase the "ike"ihood of restriking across the breaker contacts$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.0
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
:2
:=
::
:,
:*
:.
:?
:-
,0
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
Fi,ure !/124 Effect of Series apacitors on 8ine !rea"er #B.
n the abo&e e<amp"e# a series capacitor bank (ith a protecti&e "e&e" of 0$** p$u$ of "ine+to+ground &o"tage
"ea&es a residua" trapped charge of 0$,* p$u$ @b"ue "ineB# or ?,N of protecti&e "e&e"# and the T2E of the "ine
breaker on that phase is offset to 2$?? p$u$ @red "ineB (hereas for the same fau"t in the uncompensated case
the ma<imum reco&ery &o"tage is on"y 1$-2 p$u$ @green "ineB$
% T2E study that in&estigates se&era" kinds of fau"ts and different fau"t "ocations under different system
configurations shou"d be done (ith the series capacitor proper"y mode"ed$ n cases (here the series
capacitor cause the T2E of the "ine breakers to e<ceed the capabi"ity en&e"ope gi&en by the "ine breaker
manufacturer# se&era" options are a&ai"ab"e to the user to mitigate this effect of series capacitors # the user
may find one or more of these options appropriateC
1$ f the "ine breakers are not yet specified and purchased# specify and purchase a "ine breaker that
can hand"e the e<tra T2E reDuired$ Aor e<amp"e# specify and purchase a ,00kE "ine breaker for a
=:,kE system and derate the "ine breaker for the app"ication on the namep"ate$
2$ 9imit the ma<imum protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage across the series capacitor bank in order to reduce the
trapped charge across the bank and the offset of the T2E transient$ 'ote that this shou"d be
coordinated (ith any minimum protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage reDuired to Kride throughL ma<imum
s(ing currents as described in the pre&ious section$
=$ 5ypass and discharge the series capacitor bank befor e the "ine breakers open in order to remo&e
this trapped charge$ n a gap"ess configuration# this (ou"d entai" sending a signa" to the bypass
s(itch to c"ose and at the same time de"aying the opening of the "ine breakers to gi&e the bank
time to discharge$ n a gapped configuration# firing the T%G from a ground signa" cou"d
discharge the bank before the "ine breakers open (ithout reDuiring the "ine breaker opening to be
de"ayed$
n the gapped case# it shou"d be noted that T%GPs genera""y reDuire a minimum bank &o"tage in order to be
triggered# un"ike bypass s(itches that mechanica""y connect the circuit and can bypass the bank at 6ero
&o"tage$ f the user e"ects to specify a ground+fired T%G as a mitigation of "ine breaker T2E# they shou"d
specify a minimum &o"tage abo&e (hich the T%G (i"" re"iab"y fire (hen the ground signa" is present$ %
typica" &a"ue for this minimum &o"tage is ?0N of protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage# ho(e&er this &a"ue shou"d be
deri&ed from simu"ation$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
7$ ile IEEE.9:Exa%ple,pl4; x6- ar t8
factors:
offsets:
1
0
- <0=1>I)60=1?@)
2.45E-06
0
- <0=2>I)60=2?@)
2.45E-06
0
- <)!P>I)6)!P?@)
-2.45E-06
0
40 20 60 70 50 90 A%sB
61
62
61
0
1
2
A:B
7$ ile IEEE.9:Exa%ple,pl4; x6- ar t8
factors:
offsets:
1
0
- <0=1>I)60=1?@)
2.45E-06
0
- <0=2>I)60=2?@)
2.45E-06
0
- <)!P>I)6)!P?@)
-2.45E-06
0
40 20 60 70 50 90 A%sB
61
62
61
0
1
2
A:B
.1
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
t is best for the user to perform the "ine breaker T2E studies before (riting the specification# because the
conc"usions from this study (i"" affect bank design$ % T2E study comp"eted after the a(ard of the pro0ect
may p"ace ne( design "imitations on the bank that (ere not there at the proposa" stage# and the impacts of a
T2E study during the pro0ect can inc"ude a design change# additiona" unanticipated pro0ect costs# and de"ay
of the pro0ect schedu"e$
!/@/5 Su(s%nchronous resonance =SSB> screenin, studies
See %nne< C for a technica" introduction to the SS2 phenomena$ t is best for these screening studies# and
if necessary the fo""o(+up transient torDue studies as (e""# to be performed before the series capacitor
specification is (ritten$ Certain high+"e&e" design constraints can be affected by SS2 studies# inc"udingC
1$ 9imitations or reductions in "e&e" of compensation @"o(er bank 1hmsB $
2$ 2eDuirements to break the bank into mu"tip"e segments and guidance on ho( to operate the bank
based on different system configurations and "oading# or Ksystem topo"ogy$L
=$ 9imitations on the ma<imum 81E protecti&e "e&e" &o"tage$
:$ 8aking a portion of the bank into a thyristor contro""ed series capacitor @TCSCB# or a passi&e SS2
fi"ter# or "ea&ing room on the p"atform and7or in the substation for a future TCSC or fi"ter upgrade$
Specification of TCSC or passi&e SS2 fi"ter banks is outside of the scope of this guide$ 2efer to !!!
1,=: for guidance on the app"ication of TCSC banks$
!/@/< 8ine protection re'a%in, coordination studies
During a fau"t# series capacitors operate in a capaciti&e region for a portion of e&ery ha"f cyc"e# and then in
a resisti&e region for the remainder of the ha"f cyc"e$ The bank might a"so bypass during the fau"t# causing
the net system impedance to change e&en more$ Distance re"aying that attempts to "ocate the fau"t based on
apparent fau"t impedance @2 R 0TB can be foo"ed by the series capacitor bank and e&en open the (rong "ine
breakers if the re"ay is not programmed correct"y$ This is particu"ar"y an issue (hen series capacitor banks
are introduced into an e<isting "ine that is using o"der "ine protection re"ays$
8ore modern re"ays are programmab"e to dea" (ith the presence of series capacitors# and differentia"
protection is genera""y unaffected by series capacitors$ n any case# an e&a"uation of e<isting "ine protection
shou"d be performed to see if the introduction of series capacitors to the "ine (i"" ha&e an effect on its
operation$ n the case of ne( "ines and7or ne( "ine protection re"ays# the "ine protection genera""y fa""s
outside of the scope of the series capacitor pro0ect# and either the user or the "ine protection re"ay supp"ier
(i"" perform the re"ay coordination study$
To perform a re"ay coordination study# information on bank design is reDuired# inc"udingC 81E Eo"t+
%mpere @EB cur&e# bypass thresho"ds# capacitor capacitance# discharge reactor inductance# and bypass
de"ay times$ This study can genera""y be comp"eted after the series capacitor bank pro0ect is a(arded but
before the ne( "ine protection re"ays are se"ected or the e<isting re"ays are reprogrammed$ The information
reDuired to perform this study is from the fina" bank design# so it is genera""y impractica" to perform such a
study ear"ier than during the series capacitor pro0ect$
!/@/6 Insu'ation coordination stud%9 'ine7to7,round
This study shou"d genera""y be comp"eted before the specification is (ritten# because the conc"usions from
it dri&e the se"ection of p"atform support insu"ation# bypass s(itch support co"umn insu"ation# e<terna"
disconnect s(itch support insu"ation# yard bus support insu"ation# and minimum phase+to+ground and
phase+to+phase e"ectrica" c"earances$
%n a"ternate approach is to pick insu"ation "e&e"s and c"earances that ha&e been deri&ed for a nearby
substation7"ine of the same &o"tage c"ass# and to perform this study during the pro0ect to &erify the se"ected
insu"ation "e&e"s$ Caution shou"d be used (hen taking this approach# ho(e&er# because it (i"" genera""y
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.2
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
:2
:=
::
:,
:*
:.
:?
:-
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
de"ay the order of support insu"ators unti" the study is comp"ete and appro&ed# and it cou"d a"so de"ay the
structura" design of the bank @see Section 11$2$,B because insu"ation "e&e"s (i"" affect the minimum "ength
of structura" support insu"ation$
!/@/7 EAuip$ent desi,n studies
These studies are performed by the series capacitor supp"ier# and in genera" eDuipment orders cannot be
p"aced unti" these studies are comp"eted and appro&ed$ These studies focus on the eDuipment design and
ensure that# as+designed# the eDuipment meets or e<ceeds a"" of the reDuirements p"aced upon them$
!/9 #ests and Aua'it% assurance9 see 'ause Error) Beference source not found
!/9/1 01era'' Goa's of a Pro6ect #estin, Pro,ra$
% pro0ect testing program shou"d remain focused to @aB ensure the goa"s of testing are accomp"ished# and
@bB a&oid Ktesting for the sake of testing$L ;ere are some things to consider (hen (riting a testing section
to the ASC specification# as (e"" as (hen considering testing programs as proposed by eDuipment7system
manufacturers$
The o&era"" goa"s of a testing programs are to @aB de&e"op confidence in the design# app"ication# Dua"ity# and
coordination of indi&idua" components# and @bB de&e"op the understanding of both operators and
maintenance personne" (ith respect to ASC eDuipment$
!/9/1/1 #%pe/Desi,n =Pre7Production> #estin,
The goa" of type testing @a"so ca""ed design testingB of eDuipment components is to ensure that the
eDuipment# as designed# (i"" sur&i&e the app"ication$ To estab"ish a (e""+founded confidence in the
eDuipment design# a prototype pre-production unit or assemb"y or prorated sub+assemb"y is constructed
and sub0ected to stresses @&o"tage# energy# current# etc$B that are consistent (ith stresses as predicted by an
ana"ysis of the app"ication$
5ecause type testing can be &ery time+consuming and e<pensi&e# and because it must be finished before the
fina" design is comp"eted and production of eDuipment can commence# it is important to gi&e proper
consideration of reports of type+tests pre&ious"y performed on simi"ar eDuipment before reDuiring tests to
be re+performed$
!/9/1/2 Boutine =Production> #estin,
The goa" of routine testing @testing performed as a part of eDuipment productionB is to ensure that each
component produced and p"aced in ser&ice meets the Dua"ity standards$ Whi"e some routine testing is
de"iberate"y stressfu" on components @e$g$ DC tests on capacitor termina"s# energy+absorption on 81E
disksB# it is not the task of production testing to pro&e eDuipment design$ 2outine testing can be thought of
as a Kfi"terL that shou"d catch substandard units and pre&ent them from being shipped to the fie"d$ There is
a tradeoff bet(een aggressi&e @high+stressB testing that takes "ife out of eDuipment @fatigue "ife e<penditureB
and conser&ati&e @"o(+stressB testing that may a""o( too many "o(er+Dua"ity components to get to the fie"d$
!/9/1/2 Factor% and/or 0n7Site #estin, of Protection and ontro' S%ste$s
The goa" of PQC functiona" testing in the factory# and7or at site# is to ensure these systems operate as
designed$ The focus of this testing shou"d be functiona"ity$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.=
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
!/9/1/5 Pre7o$$issionin, Site #estin,
The goa" of pre+commissioning preparation and pre+energi6ation site testing is to ensure a"" eDuipment has
been proper"y connected and that energi6ation (i"" not cause damage to any eDuipment$
!/9/1/< Specia' #estin,
Specia" testing# such as staged fau"t testing# shou"d be directed at checking the accuracy of DA2 eDuipment
and o&era"" coordination of PQC systems$
!/10 Safet%9 see 'ause 12
!/11 Docu$entation9 see 'ause 15
!/12 #rainin,9 see 'ause 1<
!/12 !a'ance of p'ant9 see 'ause 16
!/15 Site ser1ices9 see 'ause 17
!/1< #echnica' fi''7in data9 see 'ause 1@
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.:
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex "
7in$r%ati-e8
Su(s%nchronous resonance ris" on tur(ine ,enerators
%pp"ication of series capacitors in "ong e"ectric po(er transmission "ines is a cost+effecti&e method to
increase po(er transfer$ ;o(e&er# use of series capacitors has sometimes been "imited because of the
concerns for subsynchronous resonance @SS2B# a detrimenta" interaction bet(een series capacitors and
nearby turbine+generators$ With todayPs understanding of the SS2 phenomenon and pro&en methods for
SS2 mitigation and protection# series capacitors can be app"ied (hi"e effecti&e"y managing the risks
associated (ith SS2$
/1 Su(s%nchronous Besonance =SSB>
Subsynchronous resonance is an interaction bet(een series capacitors and the torsiona" natura" freDuencies
of turbine+generator rotors$ n 1-=.# Concordia reported the potentia" for ad&erse interactions bet(een a
series capacitor and a turbine+generators I52J# but such interactions ne&er materia"i6ed unti" 1-.0 (hen the
first kno(n SS2 e&ent occurred at the 8oha&e p"ant I5=J$
Aigure C $1= C $1: i""ustrates the e"ements of the interaction# using the 8oha&e generating station as an
e<amp"e$ The series compensated transmission "ines ha&e "ine inductance# resistance and series capacitance
(hich resu"t in e"ectrica" resonant freDuencies @feB be"o( the fundamenta" po(er freDuency$ @In +orth
America, the fundamenta& *o0er fre1uency is 23 45. This is a&so ca&&ed the synchronous fre1uency.
,esonant fre1uencies %e&o0 the fundamenta& fre1uency are ca&&ed su%synchronous.B Turbine+generators
ha&e rotating shaft systems comprised of "arge inertia" masses that are interconnected (ith shafts that act as
springs$ These "arge masses and shafts create torsiona" resonant freDuencies# fm# some of (hich are a"so
subsynchronous$ f the transmission "ine resonant freDuency# fe# is c"ose to the comp"ementary mechanica"
system freDuency @*0+fmB of the generating machine# then the t(o osci""atory systems can interact (ith
each other$ n some operating conditions# the interaction can resu"t in damaging shaft torDues on a turbine+
generator shaft$ This interaction is ca""ed SS2# and it occurs because of the interchange of energy bet(een
the series capacitors on the transmission "ines and the mass+spring system of the turbine+generator shaft$
This interchange occurs at the subsynchronous resonance freDuency by modu"ating the *0 ;6 (a&e form$
The SS2 phenomenon actua""y occurred at the 8oha&e generating p"ant in southern 'e&ada# /S%#
resu"ting in shaft fai"ures in 1-.0 and 1-.1$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.,
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
E8E#BI&8 0SI88&#I03
SEBIES 0-PE3S&#ED -0H&.E78?G0
8I3E &3D E8E#BI&8 SIS#E-
-EH&3I&8 0SI88&#I03
-0H&.E #?B!I3E GE3EB�B
B0#&#I3G SH&F# SIS#E-
Inducti1e reactance of
'ine and s%ste$
0ther Generators
in 8/ &/ area
-oha1e 7 8u,o series
capacitors
Besistance of 8u,o
'ine and s%ste$
#o
-oha1e
Generators
#orAue effect of
e'ectrica' s%ste$
app'ied here
Exciter
Generator Botor
I/ P/ #ur(ine
H/ P/ #ur(ine
?3S#&!8E
I3#EB&#I03
Fi,ure /12 /154Interaction (et+een e'ectrica' trans$ission resonant freAuenc% =fe> and
the tur(ine7,enerator $echanica' resonant s%ste$ =607f$>/
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.*
1
1
2
=
:
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
/2 Interaction !et+een E'ectrica' and -echanica' Besonant S%ste$s
% series compensated transmission "ine in a simp"e e"ectrica" po(er system as sho(n in Aigure C $1, C $
1*# has "ine reactance @T "ineB# transformer reactance @TtB and the machine dynamic reactance @TmB$
Genera""y# the series compensation reactance @TcB in the "ine is maintained bet(een 2, to ., percent$ The
ratio of the capaciti&e reactance to the tota" "ine# machine and transformer reactance is e<pected to be
bet(een 1, to ,0 percent$ The e"ectrica" resonant freDuency for a simp"e transmission system can be
ca"cu"ated as sDrt@Tc7@T"ineRTtRTmBB<*0 ;6$ The natura" e"ectrica" freDuency @feB# in this case# (ou"d be
bet(een 2=$2 ;6 for 1, percent tota" reactance to :2$, ;6 for ,0 percent tota" reactance$ The
comp"ementary mechanica" freDuencies for this range of natura" e"ectrica" freDuencies (i"" be 1.$, ;6 to
=*$? ;6$ f there are mu"tip"e series compensated transmission "ines in pro<imity to the generators# they
(i"" create additiona" e"ectrica" resonant freDuencies$ %"so# higher the compensation in the "ines raises the
e"ectrica" resonant freDuencies and "o(ers the comp"ementary mechanica" freDuencies$ 'earby
uncompensated transmission "ines can a"so change the e"ectrica" resonant freDuencies$
9ecei-in* Syste%
7-ery l( i%pedance8
C
line
C
c
C
t
C
%
Fi,ure /1< /164Si$p'e series7co$pensated trans$ission s%ste$
Aor typica" "arge nuc"ear or fossi"+fue"ed steam turbine+generators# there are four to eight "arge masses (ith
interconnecting shafts$ Such machines are "ike"y to ha&e = to * natura" torsiona" freDuencies be"o( *0 ;6$
The mechanica" freDuencies may range from . ;6 to ,0 ;6$ Thus there are mu"tip"e e"ectrica" freDuencies
and mechanica" freDuencies that may interact (ith each other depending on the system configuration$
n genera"# "o(er torsiona" freDuencies are more "ike"y to interact (ith the e"ectrica" transmission system
than higher torsiona" freDuencies$ This is due to the mode shapes and torsiona" interaction factors that
resu"t from the inherent geometry and physica" nature of the shaft system$ n &ie( of this consideration#
SS2 prob"ems are more "ike"y to occur (ith high "e&e"s of series compensation$ Con&erse"y# the SS2
prob"em may be a&oided by keeping the series compensation "e&e"s "o($
8echanica" damping for torsiona" &ibrations is a"(ays positi&e but sma""$ t is main"y due to friction# (ind
"osses# and steam f"o( @or gas f"o(B around the rotor$ t is minimum (hen a turbine+generator is at no+
"oad# and increases (ith the "oad$ 8easured no+"oad damping for steam turbine+generator torsiona" modes
is typica""y in the range of 0$02 to 0$0,7sec$ t is &ery sma"" due to sma"" amount of steam f"o(ing in the
turbine at no+"oad$ The fu""+"oad damping is around 0$27sec or more$ 'o+"oad damping is significant"y
higher for a gas turbine+generator because the coa<ia" compressor operating at the rated speed is a
significant shaft+"oad @typica""y 20 to 2, N of rated generator outputB$ There is significant gas f"o( @or
airf"o(B in both the turbine and compressor stages e&en at no+"oad$ 8easurement on a particu"ar gas
turbine+generator yie"ded no+"oad damping of 0$17sec# and estimated fu"" "oad damping is 0$=7sec$
Shaft torDues due to SS2 are caused by t(o types of interaction mechanismsO SS2 instabi"ity and SS2
transient torDue amp"ification$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
..
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
/2 SSB Insta(i'it%
Series capacitor compensation has a tendency to act as a negati&e damping on torsiona" &ibrations of
nearby turbine generator units$ When this negati&e damping effect o&ercomes the inherent mechanica"
damping of one of the shaft torsiona" &ibration modes# the &ibration (i"" gro( e<ponentia""y and "ead to
damage on a shaft$ Genera""y# such gro(th in shaft torsiona" &ibrations occurs (ith a "ong time constant on
the order of many seconds$ This negati&e damping effect (as the cause of the 8oha&e shaft fai"ures$
Torsiona" interaction (ith the negati&e damping effect becomes unstab"e and e<cessi&e if the e"ectrica" and
torsiona" resonance freDuencies near"y coincide as fundamenta" freDuency @,07*0 ;6B comp"ements and if
the inherent mechanica" damping is "o(er than the negati&e damping effect of series capacitor$
Aigure C $1. C $1? sho(s the gro(th of torDues from an !8TP simu"ation of a SS2 instabi"ity e&ent$ The
shaft torDue on the critica" shaft @generator+e<citerB reaches about $0? per unit in 1$* seconds$ Aor this shaft#
the endurance torDue "e&e" (here significant fatigue "ife e<penditure starts to occur is about 0$=* per unit$
The s"o( gro(th of torDues in this case enab"es adeDuate time to trip a transmission "ine# bypass series
capacitors# or trip the turbine+generator to pre&ent damage to the shaft$ This type of SS2 instabi"ity
phenomenon resu"ted in shaft fai"ure on the 8oha&e turbine+generators in the ear"y 1-.0Ps$
TCSC2SS1>MACH 1-TOR 3 (Type 9)
0 500 1000 1500 2000
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Time (mS)
T
o
r
!
e
(
"
#
)
M$%&
Mi'&
A()&
A*+&
RMS&
C, &
,, &
0.0823052
0.0211425
0.0528398
0.0823052
0.0537504
1.53125
1.01723
Fi,ure /17 /1@4SSB Insta(i'it% sho+in, shaft torAues on ,enerator7exciter Shaft/
!8TP simu"ation of a critica""y tuned system$
/5 #ransient #orAue &$p'ification
Series capacitors a"so ha&e a tendency to amp"ify the shaft stress during ma0or net(ork transient e&ents
o&er abo&e the stress "e&e" that (ou"d e<ist (ithout the series capacitors$ The transient torDue on the
turbine+generator shaft shou"d be e&a"uated as (e"" as the resu"ting "oss of "ife of the shaft due to the
cumu"ati&e fatigue$ The critica" measure of the transient torDue is the magnitude of the shaft &ibration
e<cited during each net(ork transient e&ent typica""y "asting on the order of one second$ Aigure = sho(s an
e<amp"e of SS2 transient torDue amp"ification (here the resu"ting shaft torDues are higher (ith .0N series
compensation than (ith *0N$ The e"ectrica" torDue and ;P+P shaft torDue are sho(n$ Transient torDue
amp"ification becomes important on"y (hen the generator becomes near"y radia" on "ines that are hea&i"y
compensated (ith series capacitors$
%"though there is no record of se&ere damage due to transient torDue amp"ification# the anticipation of this
prob"em has "ed to a number of system design and operating criteria to "imit the e<posure of a turbine+
generator to radia" feed configurations through high"y compensated "ines after a system fau"t c"earance$ %
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.?
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
so"ution is to "imit the &o"tage across the series capacitor (ith meta"+o<ide &aristors or protecti&e gaps and
hence to reduce the transient energy in&o"&ed in the transient torDue amp"ification$ %n a"ternati&e so"ution
is to b"ock the SS2 current from f"o(ing into a generator$
% simi"ar type of shaft torDue amp"ification can occur (ith automatic high speed rec"osing of transmission
"ines$ 2ec"osing @particu"ar"y (hen the fau"t sti"" e<istsB can resu"t in a second e"ectrica" torDue stimu"us to
the shaft system# that dependent upon timing# can increase the torsiona" osci""ations (hich ha&e not
decayed sufficient"y from the first fau"t c"earing$ Whi"e indiscriminant three+phase rec"osing (ou"d be the
(orst rec"osing practice# sing"e+po"e rec"osing can a"so pro&ide e<tra torsiona" stimu"us$
Aigure C $1- C $20 sho(s the gro(th of transient torDues from a simu"ation of a system e&ent$ The system
is e<cited by a "o( impedance "ine fau"t on a series compensated transmission "ine# (hich is c"eared in
about fi&e cyc"es$ The torDues# in this case# gro( &ery rapid"y to o&er =$0 per unit in "ess than 0$* seconds$
n fact they approach critica" "e&e"s in "ess than 100 mi""iseconds$ This rate of gro(th reDuires a &ery fast
acting SS2 mitigation system to pre&ent damage to the shafts$
=a> 70J o$pensation
E'ectrica' #orAue
Shaft #orAue
E'ectrica' #orAue
Shaft #orAue
=(> 60J o$pensati on
187G fau't
187G fau't
Fi,ure /19 /204Su(s%nchronous Besonance #ransient #orAue &$p'ification
/< SSB -iti,ation and Protection
'umerous methods for mitigating SS2 ha&e been de&e"oped and imp"emented$ The type of mitigation
se"ected for a particu"ar app"ication depends on the se&erity of the SS2# the performance reDuired# and
economics$ System studies are performed to Duantify the "e&e" of SS2 and to de&e"op appropriate
mitigation and protection schemes for a gi&en app"ication I5:J$
Tab"e C $10 "ists se"ected sites of SS2 mitigation and protection scheme insta""ations$
%t the 'a&a0o po(er p"ant of the Sa"t 2i&er Pro0ect# passi&e SS2 b"ocking fi"ters (ere insta""ed to b"ock the
currents at SS2 freDuencies f"o(ing through the generator step+up transformer neutra" connections to
ground I5,J I5*J$ %"so supp"ementa" e<citation damping contro"s @S!DCsB (ere insta""ed to pro&ide
damping at the SS2 freDuencies I5*J$ The 'a&a0o units ha&e been ab"e to to"erate higher "e&e" of series
compensation (ithout risking an SS2 prob"em since 1-.*$ They are protected (ith redundant torsiona"
re"ays against SS2 conditions and possib"y other potentia""y damaging operating conditions$ Present"y# the
rotating e<citers on the units are being rep"aced (ith bus+fed e<citation systems# and the SS2 mitigation
and protection schemes are being upgraded$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
.-
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
%t >im 5ridger po(er p"ant# the series capacitors in three "ines are segmented into t(o stages# and the
compensation "e&e" is changed according to the "oad "e&e" of both the "ines and the generators$ This
s(itched capacitor section scheme together (ith S!DCs for SS2 damping has performed &ery (e"" since
1-.- I5.J$ The >im 5ridger units are protected (ith redundant torsiona" re"ays$
%t S"att in 'orthern 1regon# /S%# site tests demonstrated that a (e""+designed TCSC contro" cou"d
e"iminate SS2 affecting the 5oardman generating p"ant I5?J$
%t many other sites# the "e&e" of series compensation (as carefu""y se"ected such that no SS2 mitigation
(as needed$ n these cases# torsiona" re"ay protection (as a"" that (as needed$
.a"le ),10#Exa$p'es of SSB So'utions
;enerating
lant
(nits x
=0$
@ine
k0
B
"omp
!!/ =itigation and rotection
8oha&e 2 < -0- ,00 .0 X 2*
2educed compensation
Torsiona" re"ays
'a&a0o = < ?-2 ,00 .0
SS2 b"ocking fi"ter
S!DC
2edundant torsiona" re"ays
>im 5ridger : < ,-0 =:, :,
9oad+s(itched series capacitor
S!DC
2edundant torsiona" re"ays
Co"strip
2 < =..
2 < ?1-
,00 =, Torsiona" re"ays
Wyodak 1 < :02 2=0 ,0 Torsiona" re"ays
5oardman 1 < ,-0 ,00 2-
TCSC
Torsiona" re"ay
San >uan
2 < :10
2 < *1.
=:, =0+=:
Torsiona" re"ay
Dynamic stabi"i6er @no "onger needed after
the 1--0sB
9a Pa"ma 1 < 1-2 =:, ,0
S(itched series capacitor segments &ia SS2
current monitoring
/6 SSB Protection
% torsiona" re"ay is designed to continuous"y monitor the turbine+generatorPs shaft for torsiona" osci""ations#
and pro&ide trip output contacts (hen shaft fatigue reaches predetermined "e&e"s$ 2e"ays (ere first
de&e"oped in the 1-.0Ps# and ha&e continuous"y e&o"&ed and impro&ed since then$
% torsiona" re"ay can be configured to protect a sing"e turbine+generator (ith mu"tip"e torsiona" modes# or it
can be configured to protect mu"tip"e turbine+generator units @eg$# in mu"ti+shaft combined cyc"e p"antsB$ %
torsiona" re"ay typica""y monitors shaft speed at one or t(o "ocations# and fi"ters the signa"s to iso"ate
indi&idua" torsiona" modes$ Aor each mode# an amp"itude+&ersus+time trip cur&e is used to trip the unit or a
"ine that iso"ates the affected turbine+generator from the source of torsiona" stimu"us$
Torsiona" re"ays are the most (ide+used techniDue for addressing risks due to SS2$ Aor most systems# SS2
risk is "o( during norma" operation or "o(+"e&e" contingency situations @i$e$# '+1 or '+2 "ine outagesB$ SS2
risk typica""y becomes significant during rare mu"tip"e+outage contingencies# (here continued operation is
not critica" to the o&era"" po(er grid$ Aor these app"ications# torsiona" re"ays are used to detect conditions
(ith e<cessi&e torsiona" stress and trip the turbine+generators if necessary$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?0
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
/7 onc'usions)
Series capacitors can significant"y increase the po(er transfer capabi"ity of ac transmission systems$
;o(e&er# in some app"ications# series capacitors may introduce detrimenta" side effects# inc"uding SS2 and
transient torDue amp"ification$
Se&era" pro&en methods e<ist for mitigating the effects of SS2# inc"udingC
SS2 b"ocking fi"ters
Supp"ementa" e<citer damping contro"s @S!DCB
Thyristor+contro""ed series capacitor @TCSCB
Dynamic stabi"i6er at generator
S(itching of series capacitor segments
9imiting the tota" amount of compensation to a to"erab"e "e&e"
n addition# torsiona" re"ays are used to protect turbine+generators from damage in the e&ent that mitigations
fai" or unanticipated system e&ents occur$
Po(er system engineers ha&e designed# insta""ed# and safe"y operated numerous series+compensated
transmission systems$ Aor some systems# the best SS2 mitigation schemes ha&e been re"ati&e"y simp"e
@e$g$# "imiting ma<imum compensation to a&oid SS2B$ n other systems# a combination of SS2 mitigation
measures (as imp"emented to enab"e secure operation at higher compensation "e&e"s @e$g$# b"ocking fi"ter R
S!DC R torsiona" re"aysB$
Se"ection of the best mitigation scheme for gi&en transmission system depends on many factors# inc"udingC
Ea"ue of po(er transfer
Cost of SS2 mitigation eDuipment
1perationa" constraints imposed by SS2 mitigation
Cost of a"ternati&es to series compensation @e$g$# additiona" transmission "ineB
System studies performed ear"y in the e&o"ution of a transmission system can "ead to a design (ith the best
o&era"" ba"ance of performance# re"iabi"ity# and cost$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?1
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex )
7in$r%ati-e8
Effects of series capacitors on 'ine (rea"er #B.
During fau"t current interruption on a "ine (ith series capacitors# a breaker (i"" often e<perience a
substantia" increase in transient reco&ery &o"tage @T2EB$ This is particu"ar"y true for modern series
capacitor insta""ations that emp"oy meta"+o<ide &aristors @81EB for capacitor o&er&o"tage protection$ The
effect of the 81E is to keep the series capacitor in the circuit for the duration of the fau"t# un"ike the o"der
sparko&er gap protection that (ou"d norma""y bypass a series capacitor ear"y in the fau"t$
/pon fau"t current interruption# the "ine &o"tage rings do(n to 6ero and the bus side rises to appro<imate"y
prefau"t "e&e"# (ith both &o"tages o&ershooting their fina" &a"ue$ With modern series capacitors# current
interruption "ea&es a trapped charge on the bank appro<imate"y eDua" to the 81E c"ipping "e&e"$ This
trapped charge adds substantia" &o"tage to the breaker T2E$ The high T2E can e<ceed the capabi"ities of
an o"der breaker or e&en a ne( breaker (ith standard ratings$
Series capacitors bet(een the breaker and the fau"t increase the breaker T2E by the fu"" "e&e" of the trapped
charge# (hereas on the source side of the breaker# other uncompensated "ines (i"" attenuate the trapped
charge effect$ f the 81E is protected by a triggered gap# then the high+T2E fau"ts (ou"d be at "ocations
that do not cause the gap to fire$ Series capacitors a"so compensate part of the fau"t impedance and cause
an increase in the fau"t current$ The higher T2Es and fau"t current are "argest for mu"ti+phase fau"ts$
1ne of the simp"est methods to decrease the T2E is to app"y arresters on the "ine side of the breaker#
thereby "imiting the "ine &o"tage to the arrester c"ipping "e&e"$ /nder certain configurations it may a"so be
necessary to ha&e an arrester on the bus side of the breaker$ /nfortunate"y# e&en (ith arresters# the
resu"ting T2E can e<ceed the breaker standards and reDuire a specia" purpose breaker$ %"though se"dom
emp"oyed# opening resistors or arresters across the breaker contacts (i"" contro" the T2E to acceptab"e
"e&e"s$ Aor systems (ith series capacitors# detai"ed transient ana"ysis is reDuired to determine breaker
reDuirements$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?2
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex ,
7in$r%ati-e8
I$pact of series capacitors on 'ine o1er1o'ta,es and secondar% arc
extinction
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?=
1
1
2
=
:
,
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex >
7in$r%ati-e8
Po+er s%ste$ $ode'in, for use in FS eAuip$ent ratin, studies
F/1 Definin, a Po+er S%ste$ EAui1a'ent ircuit and &ssociated Fau't urrents for
?se in Definin, the Fau't Cithstand BeAuire$ents of Series apacitor Protecti1e
De1ices/
%s noted in %nne< 5$,$2$,# it is recommended that the purchaser perform studies to define the &aristor
reDuirements for the specification$ ;o(e&er it is usefu" to inc"ude in the specification# an eDui&a"ent circuit
for the po(er system from (hich the supp"ier may perform confirming studies or the bidder may ascertain
the fau"t current reDuirements of the bypass path$
F/1/1 EAui1a'ent circuit
The minimum e<tent of the po(er system (ou"d inc"ude the "ines to be compensated and eDui&a"ent
impedances at the "ine termina"s$ t is preferab"e to inc"ude at "east one "ine segment bet(een the actua"
compensated "ine and the source impedance@sB$ t is a"so preferab"e to inc"ude transfer impedances
representing the under"ying net(ork$ % one+"ine diagram shou"d be pro&ided$ The transmission "ine data
shou"d inc"ude the positi&e and 6ero seDuence series impedances and shunt capacitances$ This app"ies if the
"ines are transposed$ f the "ines are not transposed# a parameter matri< is reDuired$ Data on "ine shunt
reactors must be pro&ided$ %t the termina"s of the "ines# the eDui&a"ent positi&e and 6ero seDuence
impedances must be pro&ided$ The data can be pro&ided in (ritten form but a data fi"e in the !8TP7%TP
format is preferred$
F/1/2 Fau't currents
The definition of fau"t currents for series capacitor bank specification is prob"ematic$ The fau"t current that
affects a series capacitor bank is on"y the component of current through the bank and not the tota" fau"t
current$ n addition# the impedance of the bank to through fau"t currents is mu"ti+faceted$ The bank may be
bypassed (ith the bypass s(itch or (ith the bypass gap$ n this mode the bank is usua""y a &ery "o(
inducti&e reactance and the current can be determined$ f the bank is inserted it is possib"e to ca"cu"ate a
&ery high fau"t current through the bank if the fau"t is assumed to be "ocated on the po(er system (here the
inducti&e reactance of the po(er system is cance"ed by the capaciti&e reactance of the bank$ Such a
condition is on"y theoretica" since (ith an actua" bank the high current (ou"d resu"t in high &o"tage across
the bank protecti&e de&ice and the conduction of that de&ice$ This conduction fundamenta""y changes the
apparent impedance of the bank and the ca"cu"ated &ery high current does not occur$ f the protecti&e
de&ice inc"udes a &aristor# the on"y (ay to determine the current through an inserted bank is to use a
program "ike !8TP7%TP$ See %nne< ; for a further discussion of Aau"t currents in connection (ith series
capacitors$
t is recommended that the specification shou"d inc"ude the eDui&a"ent circuit and associated impedances as
discussed abo&e$ The specification can a"so inc"ude ca"cu"ated fau"t current through the bank for the
bypassed condition @inducti&e supp"y net(orkB$ The resu"ts of "inear ca"cu"ations (ith the bank inserted
shou"d not be inc"uded in a specification as these resu"ts are meaning"ess un"ess the fau"t current is "ess than
t(o times the rated current of the bank$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?:
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
:2
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
F/2 Discussion of s%ste$ studies for deter$inin, the ratin,s for 1aristors and
th%ristor 1a'1es
F/2/1 Genera'
%s Section 10 indicates a &aristor is pro&ided in most modern series capacitor design to contro" the &o"tage
across the capacitor units to (ithin the tested capabi"ity of the capacitor$ n doing this the &aristor is
e<posed# during fau"ts# to significant duties (hich cou"d affect the sur&i&abi"ity of the de&ice$ Computer
simu"ations are reDuired to accurate"y identify these duties and proper"y si6e the &aristor$ These
simu"ations inc"ude assumptions regarding the type# "ocation and duration of a fau"t@sB and fo""o(ing fau"ts
the temporary @system s(ings and =0+min$ ratingsB and the continuous &o"tage stresses that are present$
The duties (hich the &aristor are e<posed to during fau"ts can be contro""ed by bypassing the &aristor
through the use of a triggered gap# bypass breaker or thyristors$ n some cases such as a fau"t e<terna" to
the "ine section being compensated# bypassing may not be a""o(ed$ f bypassing is not a""o(ed or de"ayed
either intentiona""y or due to the operating time of the bypass de&ice# the &aristor must be si6ed to (ithstand
this duty and be therma""y stab"e for other stresses fo""o(ing this duty$
F/2/2 !%passin,
%s indicated abo&e# &aristor si6ing must account for the time to bypass and the duty cyc"e that the bank is
e<pected to (ithstand$ The fo""o(ing pro&ides typica" &a"ues (hich ha&e been assumedC 5ypass breaker
,0+.0 msec# Triggered gap : msec and thyristor bypassing in 1msec$ n must be recogni6ed that the abo&e
times to bypass on"y app"y after the protecti&e thresho"d has been e<ceeded$ Typica""y (ith &aristor current
being monitored the thresho"d (i"" be associated (ith &aristor current magnitude# accumu"ated energy
based on monitored current and assumed protecti&e "e&e" and7or rate of rise of current$
F/2/2 -ode'in,
Earistor si6ing studies a"so reDuire that a number of assumptions must be made about the po(er system# the
possib"e series cap future modifications# and the criteria for bank bypassing and "ock out$ These
assumptions are described be"o($
System Configuration F 8ust be based on the generation# transformation and "ine additions e<pected during
the "ife of the pro0ect$
Series Capacitor 2atings F 8ust account for the initia" and u"timate continuous current rating# =0+min
o&er"oad rating# and e<pected protecti&e "e&e" @puB$ %"though there are other considerations# (hich must be
addressed by and coordinated (ith the manufacturer# typica""y the protecti&e "e&e" is 0$, pu abo&e the 10+
sec system s(ing$
1ther 5anks %"" other series capacitors banks in the &icinity must a"so be mode"ed as is or (ith their fina"
characteristics to determine the greatest &aristor duty$
F/2/5 Externa' Fau't riteria
This criteria has been used to define the system configurations and types of fau"ts (hich the series capacitor
(i"" be reDuired to Zride throughZ (ithout bypassing$ These fau"ts are e<terna" to the "ine containing the
series capacitor and determine the minimum possib"e 81E energy reDuirements and bypass current and
energy thresho"d "e&e"s$ The fo""o(ing items summari6e this criteria$
1$ 1ne piece of eDuipment or one transmission "ine cou"d be out of ser&ice prior to a fau"t$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?,
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
:2
:=
::
:,
:*
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
2$ Sing"e phase or mu"ti phase fau"ts are used at any e<terna" "ocation$
=$ The ma<imum norma" breaker c"earing time is four cyc"es and the minimum is t(o
cyc"es$ This a""o(s a ma<imum of t(o cyc"es of ZstaggerZ bet(een "ine ends in c"earing a
fau"t
:$ % 5reaker fai"ure condition is used on"y for sing"e phase fau"ts$ The c"earing time for
breaker fai"ure is 12 cyc"es from the time of fau"t$
,$ The ma<imum 81E energy and current for any fau"t case are found (ith any pre fau"t
"oading "e&e" up to the =0 minute rating$
F/2/< Interna' Fau't riteria
This criteria has a"so been used to determine the 81E energy reDuirements for fau"ts interna" to the "ine
containing the series capacitor bank$ The purpose of this criteria is to insure that the bank has adeDuate
81E energy capabi"ity to hand"e the (orst case interna" fau"t e&ent prior to a bypass operation$ The
fo""o(ing items summari6e this criteria$
1$ %ny system configuration is a""o(ed$
2$ %ny type of fau"t at any "ocation is a""o(ed for interna" fau"ts# inc"uding c"osing into the
fau"t manua""y# or rec"osing automatica""y @S9 G fau"tsB$
=$ The ma<imum norma" breaker c"earing time is four cyc"es and the minimum is t(o
cyc"es# a""o(ing a ma<imum of t(o cyc"es of ZstaggerZ bet(een "ine ends in c"earing a
fau"t$
:$ 2ec"osing is done on"y for sing"e phase fau"ts$
,$ Sing"e phase and three phase breaker fai"ures are a""o(ed (ith a c"earing time of 12
cyc"es from initiation of the fau"t$
*$ 81E protection (i"" be from a triggered gap or bypass breaker$ The contro" system
bypass thresho"ds (i"" be set at 120N of both the peak 81E current and highest 81E
energy from a"" e<terna" fau"ts consistent (ith the criteria abo&e$
.$ The bank bypassing de"ay times after crossing 81E current or energy thresho"ds (i"" be
assumed to be the fo""o(ingC triggered gapC = ms# bypass breakerC : cyc"es
F/2/6 Discussion
Arom past e<perience# the most economica" series capacitor bank ne<t to a strong bus (i"" use a triggered
gap to protect the &aristor$ 2ecent"y some designs ha&e significant"y reduced the &aristor si6e by using a
thyristor as a bypass de&ice$ Gap"ess design# near a strong bus# typica""y reDuire a significant"y "arger
&aristor# to sur&i&e a =+ph interna" fau"t (ith breaker bypass protection$ Gap"ess designs may be
economica" for mid+"ine app"ications$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?*
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex ;
7in$r%ati-e8
I$pact of 'ine har$onics on the desi,n and protection of FS (an"s
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?.
1
1
2
=
:
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex C
7in$r%ati-e8
Fau't current discussion
n this %nne< (e (i"" discuss some important aspects regarding fau"t currents in Series Compensated
net(orks$ We (i"" a"so discuss ho( mode"ing of the Series Capacitor (i"" affect the resu"t of a fau"t current
ca"cu"ation$ The fo""o(ing aspects (i"" be discussedC
Wa&eforms and ana"ytica" e<pressions of fau"t currents in inductive @non+series+compensatedB and
series compensated networks.
8ode""ing of Series Capacitors in traditiona" short circuit ca"cu"ations
8ode""ing of Series Capacitors in transient short circuit ca"cu"ations
Definiton of Total >ault "urrent and Through >ault "urrent @artial >ault "urrentB$
H/1 Ca1efor$s and ana'%tica' expressions of fau't currents in inducti1e and series
co$pensated net+or"s
Transmission "ines are inherent"y inducti&e$ n a net(ork (ithout series capacitors# fau"t currents are
inducti&e in character and the "ine current a"(ays "ags the &o"tage by some ang"e$
With the series compensation of the transmission "ines# capaciti&e e"ements are introduced and the resu"ting
net(ork is no "onger on"y inducti&e under a"" fau"t conditions$ The degree of this change depends on the
"ine and net(ork parameters# the e<tent of series compensation# the type of fau"t# and the fau"t "ocation$
We (i"" use the reduced and simp"ified net(ork sho(n in Aigure A $21 ; $22 to i""ustrate abo&e$
Fi,ure F/21 H/2244Si$p'ified representation of a fau't in a series co$pensated net+or"
;ere C U Tc 7 # 2 U 2S9 R d[2"# and 9 U 9S9 R d[9"$ %s usua"#
Tc IJ is the reactance of the series capacitor#
is the angu"ar freDuency of the source !8As#
2S9 IJ is the resistance of the source#
2" IJ is the resistance of the po(er transmission "ine#
9S9 I;J is the inductance of the source#
9" I;J is the inductance of the po(er "ine#
d I+J is the re"ati&e distance from the re"ay point to the fau"t "ocation A$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
K
e = t >
B
8
D
??
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
We assume that the fau"t occurs at t U 0 and that is the fau"t inception ang"e$
!Duation 10 defines the source !8AC
( ) ( ) + t E t e
m
sin
EAuation 10
!Duation 11 gi&es the &o"tage re"ations for the non-series-compensated lineC
( ) ( ) + + t E t i ,
dt
di
m f
f
sin
EAuation 11
!Duation 12 defines the fau"t current if @tB for the non-series-compensated lineC
( ) ( ) ( ) t i t i t i
ft fs f
+
EAuation 12
;ere ifs@tB I%J is the steady+state part of the fau"t current and ift@tB I%J is the transient part$ !Duation 1=#
!Duation 1:# and !Duation 1, define the steady+state part of the fau"t currentC
( ) ( ) + t
6
E
t i
m
fs
sin
EAuation 12
( )
2 2
, 6 +
EAuation 15
( )
,
t'
EAuation 1<
!Duation 1* and !Duation 1. define the transient part of the fau"t currentC
( )
,
t
ft
e 7 t i
0
EAuation 16
( )
sin
0 0
6
E
I 7
m
t
EAuation 17
;ere tU0 is the current through the inductance at t U 0
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
?-
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
The fau"t current for a fau"t in a non+series+compensated net(ork consists of a steady+state part and a
transient part$ The transient part consists of a damped DC+current$ The "atter dies out (ith a time+constant
eDua" to 972$
Aigure A $2= ; $2:sho(s a typica" (a&eform of a fau"t current in a non-series-compensated network The
fau"t inception ang"e has been &aried in order to obtain ma<imum &a"ue of the transient fau"t+current$
7$ile da%pttEepE1221,pl4; x6-ar t8 c<! 60
0,00 0,04 0,05 0,12 0,16 0,20
AsB
6100
672
620
622
0
22
20
72
100
A'!B
Dault6current, Fn6series6c%pensated net(r',
Fi,ure F/22 H/254-axi$u$ transient fau't7current in a non7series7co$pensated
=inducti1e> net+or"
!Duation 1? defines the &o"tage "oop for the series compensated lineC
( ) ( ) + + + t E t i
- dt
di
,
dt
i d
m f
f f
cos
1
2
2
EAuation 1@
!Duation 1- defines the fau"t current if @tB in the series compensated lineC
( ) ( ) ( ) t i t i t i
ft fs f
+
EAuation 19
;ere ifs @tB I%J is the steady+state part and ift @tB I%J is the transient part of the fau"t current$ !Duation 20#
!Duation 21# and !Duation 22 define the steady+state part of the fau"t currentC
( ) ( ) + t
6
E
t i
m
fs
sin
EAuation 20
2
2
1
,
_
+
-
, 6
EAuation 21
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-0
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
( )
,
-
t'
1
EAuation 22
!Duation 2=# !Duation 2:# and !Duation 2, define the transient part of the fau"t currentC
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t 7 t 7 e t i
t
ft
+
sin cos
2 1
EAuation 22
( )
sin
0 1
6
E
I 7
m
t
EAuation 25
EAuation 2<
;ere tU0 is the current through the inductance at t U 0# and EtU0 is the &o"tage across the capacitor at t U 0$
!Duation 2* and !Duation 2. define the parameters and C
EAuation 26
2
2
:
1
,
-
EAuation 27
The fau"t current for a fau"t in a series compensated net(ork consists of a steady+state part and a transient
part$ The transient part consists of a damped osci""ation$ The "atter has an angu"ar freDuency and dies out
(ith a time+constant of 17$ This osci""ating transient part corresponds to the DC transient part in a non+
compensated net(ork$ The short+circuit current has a s"o( increase dependent on the degree of
compensation$ % particu"ar"y characteristic feature is the de"ayed beginning of the osci""ations and the
o&ershooting beyond the steady+state &a"ue after a fe( cyc"es$
Aigure A $2, ; $2* sho(s a typica" (a&eform of a fau"t current in a series-compensated network. The
fau"t inception ang"e has been &aried in order to obtain ma<imum &a"ue of the transient fau"t+current$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
( ) ( ) ( ) 7
E V
,
I
E
6
E ,
6
m t t
m m
2 0 0
1
2 2
1
]
1
sin cos sin
-1
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
7$ ile da%pttEepE1212,pl4; x6-ar t8 c<! 60
0,00 0,04 0,05 0,12 0,16 0,20
AsB
6100
672
620
622
0
22
20
72
100
A'!B
Dault6current, series c%pensat ed net(r', Ideal series capacitr (ithut - er- lta*e prtectin,
Fi,ure F/2< H/264-axi$u$ transient fau't7current in a series7co$pensated net+or"/ Idea'
series capacitor +ithout -0. o1er1o'ta,e protection/
The (a&eform in Aigure A $2, ; $2* is app"icab"e for fau"ts remote from the SC for (hich the protecti&e
"e&e" &o"tage of the o&er&o"tage protection de&ice (i"" not be reached$ Aor c"ose+in fau"ts# the high fau"t
current (i"" produce a high &o"tage across the series capacitor (hich (i"" cause the o&er&o"tage protection
de&ice to operate$ Aigure A $2. ; $2? sho(s the (a&eform of the fau"t+current if the SC is eDuipped (ith a
81E o&er&o"tage protection de&ice$ The fau"t inception ang"e has been &aried in order to obtain ma<imum
&a"ue of the transient fau"t+current$
'ote that the transient part of the fau"t current is hea&i"y damped by the 81E$ The resu"t is that the
asymmetry in the fau"t+current is &ery sma"" and steady state condition is reached after on"y 1+2 cyc"es$
7$ile da%pttEepE122,pl4; x6-ar t8 c<! 60
0,00 0,04 0,05 0,12 0,16 0,20
AsB
6100
672
620
622
0
22
20
72
100
A'!B
Dault6current, series c%pensated net(r', Series capacitr (ith G@: -er-lta*e prtectin,
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-2
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
Fi,ure F/27 H/2@4 -axi$u$ transient fau't7current in a series7co$pensated net+or"/
Series capacitor eAuipped +ith -0. o1er1o'ta,e protection/
#ote. f the SC is eDuipped (ith a bypass gap# the SC (i"" be short+circuited (hen the bypass gap operates$
This (i"" immediate"y transform the fau"t circuit from an 2+9+C+circuit to an 2+9+circuit$
H/2 -ode'in, of series capacitors in traditiona' short circuit ca'cu'ations/
/se of traditiona" soft(are for ordinary short+circuit ca"cu"ations @"ike PSS7!B (i"" gi&e fa"se resu"ts (hen
app"ied to a series compensated net(ork$ Depending upon the fau"t "ocation# fau"t currents (hich are 2+,
times too "arge may resu"t$ The reason is# that the series capacitors are represented as idea" capacitors
during the fau"t ca"cu"ation and no regard is taken to the o&er&o"tage protection of the series capacitor$
To o&ercome this# a soft(are for ordinary short+circuit current ca"cu"ations shou"d be comp"emented (ith
e$g$ a "inear 81E mode" I51J for appro<imate ca"cu"ation of fau"t currents in a series compensated
net(ork$ Spark gaps may be represented by current+contro""ed s(itches$
H/2 -ode'in, of series capacitors in transient short circuit ca'cu'ations/
The on"y (ay to ca"cu"ate the actua" fau"t current and the partia" fau"t+currents (hen the SC is operated in
the inserted mode (ith the &aristor conducting# is to use an e"ectromagnetic transient computer soft(are
"ike !8TP7%TP$ The SC must be mode"ed together (ith the 81E and the bypass gap if app"icab"e$ The
current "imiting damping eDuipment sha"" a"so be inc"uded in the mode"$ The 81E o&er"oad re"ay
protection and spark gap re"ay protection shou"d be mode"ed in T%CS @!8TP7%TPB$
#ote. t shou"d be obser&ed# that care must be e<ercised (hen the partia" fau"t+current through the current
"imiting damping reactor is going to be ca"cu"ated (hen the SC is in the bypassed mode$ f Series
Capacitors are insta""ed in the ad0acent "ines# the partia" fau"t current through the current "imiting damping
reactor will not be inductive$ ;ence# the ca"cu"ation of the partia" fau"t+current a"so in the bypassed mode
has to be performed by !8TP7%TP$ The SCs in the ad0acent "ines must be mode"ed together (ith their
81Es and the bypass gaps if app"icab"e$
H/5 Definition of #ota' Fau't urrent and #hrou,h Fau't urrent =Partia' Fau't
urrent>
The fau"t current (hich affects the SC is on"y the component of the fau"t current that f"o(s through the SC
bank and not the tota" fau"t current$ See Aigure A $2- ; $=0 be"o($ The component of the the fau"t current
(hich f"o(s through the SC bank is ca""ed Kthrough fau"t currentL or Kpartia" fau"t currentL @ 1 or 2B$ The
tota" fau"t current is denoted f $ See a"so Aigure A $2, ; $2*$
f
Aau"t node7"ocation
Fi,ure F/29 H/204Definition of :throu,h fau't current; = I1 F I2 > and :tota' fau't current;
= If >/
Aor con&enience# some usefu" definitions re"ated to c"assica" @inducti&eB fau"t currents
@short+circuit currentsB are inc"uded be"o($ 2eference is made to the attached Aigure A $=1 ; $=2 and
Aigure G $== $=:$ Some of these definitions might a"so be app"ied to Kcapaciti&eL fau"t currents$
$. >ault current : o&er+current resu"ting from a short circuit in an e"ectric system
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-=
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
=.
=?
=-
:0
:1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
%. !ymmetrical fault current: r$m$s$ &a"ue of the a$c$ symmetrica" component of a fau"t current # the
aperiodic component of current# if any# being neg"ected$
". )ecaying (aperiodic) component i d.c. of short circuit current: mean &a"ue bet(een the top and the
bottom en&e"ope of a short circuit current decaying from an initia" &a"ue to 6ero according to Aigure A $=1
; $=2$
): eak fault current 3 p : ma<imum possib"e instantaneous &a"ue of the fau"t current @see Aigure A $=1
; $=2B
'1T!$ The magnitude of the peak fau"t current &aries in accordance (ith the moment at (hich the short
circuit occurs$
,. !teady state fault current 3k : r$m$s&a"ue of the fau"t current (hich remains after the decay of the
transient phenomena @see Aigure A $=1 ; $=2B$
/emark. Definitions %# 5# D and ! may be app"ied a"so for fau"t currents supp"ied by series compensated
net(orks$
Fi,ure F/21 H/224Short7circuit current of a far7fro$7,enerator short circuit +ith constant
a/c/ co$ponent =sche$atic dia,ra$>
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-:
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-,
1
1
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
$nnex 3 Fi,ure G/22 I/254haracteriLation of short circuits and their
currents
7in$r%ati-e8
Discussion of s+in, current
During and fo""o(ing disconnection of a po(er system fau"t# the synchronous machines of the po(er
system (i"" start to osci""ate @s(ingB against each other (ith a "o( freDuencyO usua""y around 0$, + 2 ;6$
These osci""ations# (hich are ca""ed e"ectromechanica" osci""ations# (i"" cause osci""atory currents and
&o"tages to appear in the po(er system$ The Series Capacitor current associated (ith the osci""ating
synchronous machines is ca""ed the s(ing current$ The "o( freDuency osci""ation is superimposed upon the
fundamenta" freDuency current# i$e$ the "ine current is amp"itude modu"ated by the "o( freDuency
osci""ation$ The s(ing current produces a s(ing &o"tage across the fi<ed series capacitor @ASCB of the
po(er system$
)efinition: The s(ing current of a ASC is the greatest &a"ue of the osci""atory portion of the ASC current
during the transient period fo""o(ing a "arge disturbance$ The s(ing current is measured in % rms and is
characteri6ed by a specified freDuency and decay time+constant$
#ote: 1sci""ations of this type shou"d be based on po(er s(ings of the system generating units in response
to the most se&ere contingency that the system is designed to (ithstand$ Po(er s(ings inc"uding s(ing
currents are ca"cu"ated by means of con&entiona" stabi"ity computer soft(are$ The output currents of a
con&entiona" stabi"ity computer program (i"" be in direct# Duadrature# and 6ero+seDuence components in
%28S or k%28S$ % typica" SC s(ing current fo""o(ing a fau"t and c"earing of a para""e" "ine is depicted in
Aigure G $=, $=* be"o(C
Fi,ure G/2< I/264 #%pica' current ti$e profi'e of an S (an" fo''o+in, a fau't and c'earin,
of a para''e' 'ine/ #he fau't current is not sho+n/
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
S H S . E G S I I F J
E G E 9 J E F ) H ? @ ! D I F J
) @ F . I F K @ K S ? @ ! D I F J
D ! K ? .
S E ) @ F D S
# I - E
2 0 0
1 0 0
0
!
&
3
*
?
B
B
E
3
#
=
i
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
r
a
t
e
d
>
G I F K . E S > @ K 9 S
-*
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2
=
IEEE P1726/D10D910,January January 20102010
!tresses on a >!" caused by a swing current
The s(ing current (i"" stress the ASC components in different (ays depending on the type of ASC bypass
system and the ASC operation state$ The ASC bank sha"" be designed to (ithstand the associated stresses$
Typica" range of a SC s(ing current is 1$. F 2$, p$u$ of the rated SC current$ The most common &a"ue is
1$.+2$0 p$u$ The typica" duration of the SC s(ing current ranges from 1s to 10s$
;ap-protected banks
,xternal faults: The bank is norma""y bypassed for e<terna" fau"ts$ The bank sha"" be designed to reinsert
against the s(ing current after disconnection of the fau"t$
1
Remark: f the bank is not bypassed for an e<terna" fau"t# the bank sha"" be designed to (ithstand the
stresses caused by the s(ing current$
3nternal faults: The bank is bypassed for interna" fau"ts$ The bank sha"" be designed to reinsert against the
s(ing current after disconnection of the fau"t and rapid autorec"osing of the "ine$ f the "ine is manua""y
rec"osed# the bank sha"" be designed to reinsert against the actua" "ine current# (hich is norma""y much
sma""er compared to the s(ing current$
!rrorC 2eference source not found
=&0-protected banks
,xternal faults: The bank is norma""y not bypassed for e<terna" fau"ts$ The bank sha"" be designed to
(ithstand the stresses caused by the fau"t and the subseDuent s(ing current$
2
Remark: f the bank is bypassed for an e<terna" fau"t# the bank sha"" be designed to reinsert against the
s(ing current after disconnection of the fau"t$
3nternal faults: The bank is norma""y bypassed for interna" fau"ts$ The bank sha"" be designed to reinsert
against the s(ing current after disconnection of the fau"t and rapid autorec"osing of the "ine$ The 81E
energy associated (ith the reinsertion transient sha"" be taken into account in the 81E design$ f the "ine is
manua""y rec"osed# the bank sha"" be designed to reinsert against the actua" "ine current# (hich is norma""y
much sma""er compared to the s(ing current$!rrorC 2eference source not found
1
The Protecti&e 9e&e" Eo"tage @/P9B of the capacitor sha"" be se"ected high enough in order that the ASC can be reinserted against the
s(ing current (ithout spark o&er of the protecti&e gap due to the appearing SC reinsertion &o"tage$ f t(o or more ASC segments are
reinserted# due regard sha"" be taken to the DC+component in ASC reinsertion &o"tage$ This (ou"d norma""y resu"t in a &ery high &a"ue
of /P9 # un"ess some kind of ASC reinsertion &o"tage "imitation is emp"oyed$
2
We can distinguish bet(een t(o cases depending upon the se"ection of the Protecti&e 9e&e" Eo"tage @/P9B of the 81E$
/P9 is s"ight"y abo&e @say 10 NB the s(ing &o"tage or "o(er than the s(ing &o"tage$ The reason for this se"ection of /P9
cou"d be mitigation of transient torDue stresses on T+G shafts due to SS2$ n this case the 81E sha"" be designed for the
e<tensi&e energy in0ection during the s(ing in addition to the energy in0ection caused by the initia" po(er system fau"t$
This (ou"d norma""y resu"t in a &ery "arge energy rating of the &aristor$ This case is &ery rare$
/P9 is se"ected to be 1, F 20 N abo&e the ma<imum s(ing &o"tage$ This is the norma" case$ %fter ha&ing been e<posed to
the energy in0ection during the po(er system fau"t# and the corresponding temperature increase# the &aristor sha"" be
therma""y stab"e against the s(ing &o"tage caused by the po(er system s(ing$ The s(ing &o"tage (i"" appear as an
o&er"oad &o"tage stress on the &aristor for the specified duration of the s(ing &o"tage$
)pyri*ht + 2010 2010 IEEE, !ll ri*hts reser-ed,
.his is an unappr-ed IEEE Standards Dra$t, su"/ect t chan*e,
-.
1
1
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*
1.
1?
1-
20
21
22
2=
2:
2,
2*
2.
2?
2-
=0
=1
=2
==
=:
=,
=*
2
=
:
,
*
.
?
-
10
11
12
1=
1:
1,
1*