,
_
,
_
,
_
+
2
2
2 2
8760
1
2
1
1 .
8760
n Utilizatio n Utilisatio
Loss
T T
T [Hours] Eq. 4
Energy Cost
The energy cost normally to be used for optimization of transmission line is the long run
marginal cost of generation. In Nepal, it has been agreed that an average incremental cost of
generation better reflects the real value and is therefore used. The average incremental cost of
generation is 6.02 USC/kWh.
Operation & Maintenance
The operation and maintenance cost of transmission line is set to 1.5% of initial investment by
NEA. Typical figures range from 0.5% to 1.5%, and Nepal may be in the upper range of this
due to the recurring monsoon and frequent landslides. An annual operation and maintenance
cost of 1.5% has therefore been used in the optimization.
Annual Outage
Outage means power transmission failure due to unavailability of transmission line during
faulty condition. In Nepal, for 132 kV transmissions line the annual outage is taken as
0.28hrs/km.
Discount Factor
The discount factor represents the discounted value of fixed annual payments of one unit each
year of the lifetime. With 25 years technical lifetime and 10% discount rate, the discount factor
is 9.08.
( )
( )
1
]
1
+
+
N
N
i i
i
DF
1
1 1
Eq. 5
Where, DF is discount factor, i is discount rate in percent, N is Number of compounding
periods in years.
Chapter 3. Methodology
16
Spreadsheet Result:
Input to the spreadsheet program are line length, power factor, voltage level and power to be
transmitted from generation source to distribut ion substation. The program will carry out
transmission line design analysis using selected four different conductors from a given list. The
result is the outcome of technical and financial analysis. For technical analysis the program will
give, voltage regulation, efficiency of line and line loss. Changing either conductor size or
voltage level, the result can be made within required voltage regulation and efficiency.
Financial analysis is based on transmission line cost with selected conductor only. For more
than one conductor satisfying both criteria i.e. voltage regulation and efficiency the best
conductor is selected for minimum K
Total
in given in Equation 1.
Input
Input parameters in spread sheet calculation for selecting conductor are power to be delivered
in MW, line length (L) in km and power factor (Cosf ).
Testing criteria
The selected conductor should meet both efficiency and voltage regulation criteria. If one of
these criteria is violated, the conductor is not suitable for the transmission line. As per NEA
Grid Code efficiency should be not less than 95.5% and voltage regulation should be 10 %.
Voltage Regulation
Voltage regulation of a line is the change in voltage at the receiving end when full load at a
given power factor is removed keeping sending end voltage constant.
rfl
rfl rnl
V
V V
gulation
Re % Eq. 6
Where,
V
rnl
= magnitude of receiving-end voltage at no load.
V
rfl
= magnitude of receiving-end voltage at full load.
Transmission Efficiency
% 100 *
s
R
line
P
P
Eq. 7
Where,
P
R
= Power to be delivered at receiving end
Ps = Power sent at the sending end
Chapter 3. Methodology
17
Conductor and Voltage Optimzation
300
800
1300
1800
2300
2800
3300
3800
4300
4800
1 Mw 2MW 3MW 4MW 5MW 6 MW 7MW 8 MW
Peak Load [MW]
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
C
o
s
t
[
k
N
R
s
.
]
Weasel_33
Rabbit_33
Beaver_33
Dog_33
Tiger_33
Wolf_33
Lynx_33
Panther_33
Dog_66
Wolf_66
Panther_66
Lion_66
Figure 3.1: Conductor optimization sheet using spreadsheet
Chapter 3. Methodology
18
3.8 Carl 1.0
In order to evaluate the performance of a power distribution network and to examine the
effectiveness of proposed alterations to a system in the planning stage, it is essential that a load
flow analysis of the network is carried out. The load flow studies are normally carried out to
determine:
1. The flow of active and reactive power in network branches.
2. Effect of additions or alterations on a system.
3. Optimum system loading conditions.
4. Optimum system losses.
Input
For this software-Carl1.0, the input parameters are related to the 11 kV radial distribution
feeders only. Input data related to 11 kV feeder are; substation capacity (MVA), voltage level
(kV), name of load centers, name of sending end node and receiving end node, distribution load
(kVA of 11/0.4 kV distribution transformer), power factor, length of 11 kV line between
sending end and receiving end of a branch and finally type conductor. This software allows
only three conductor options viz. 'dog, rabbit and weasel because in Nepal, only
conductors dog, rabbit and weasel are used in the distribution level.
Output
The output of the software is directly saved in the MS Excel sheet. The results of load flow are;
total power loss in each branch feeders (sum of loss in all branches), total power flow in each
branch, minimum voltage in percent ; voltage drop in each branch, voltage at each receiving
end, location of node with minimum voltage, length of different type of conductor used, total
power loss of the feeder and total power flow in the feeder.
Using this software conductor selection, feeder load management and voltage regulation can be
done. This software is used just to study the status of local load centers.
3.9 Netbas Simulation
This software is developed by Powel Company, Norway. Netbas Simulation is very helpful in
solving load flow analysis, short circuit analysis and other power system analysis. In this thesis,
Netbas is used for determining the system performance after connecting a small power plant in
Chapter 3. Methodology
19
the existing electrical network. The comparison between status of existing electrical network
before and after connecting new power plant will definitely help in selecting best evacuation
option for upcoming hydropower plant.
As per grid code, NEA, in Nepal study of system performance is necessary for any new hydro
power plant more than 1 MW, willing to connect to the grid. System performance shall include
the following information:
1. Power flow direction during different time frame, loading conditions.
2. Change in voltage regulation in existing electrical network
3. Change in transmission line loss in existing electrical network.
These required data can be easily determined using Netbas Simulation
3.10 Evacuation System for KHP, LNHP and LKHP.
The methodology described above is used to study evacuation system of KHP, LNHP and
LKHP in Lamjung district. These power plants are under different stages of development. The
present status shows that KHP will come first then LNHP and at last LKHP. For all these power
plants the nearest available existing grid is 33/11 kV, 5 MVA, Udipur substation which is fed
by 132/33 kV grid substation at Damauli, 34.5 km away at Tanahu district. There are no other
options available for power evacuation from these power plants. Therefore, this thesis
concentrates on detail study for evacuating power using existing transmission system for
different loading conditions.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
20
CHAPTER 4
Results And Discussions
Existing system in Lamjung district is shown below. Udipur substation is 14 km away from
Dumre substation and connected with 33 kV transmission line with conductor 'dog'. Dumre,
Udipur and Anbu Khaireni substations are fed by Damauli 132/33 substation through 14.5 km
long 33 kV transmission line from Damauli S/S to Dumre S/S. Single line diagram of existing
33 kV sub transmission network is shown in figure below.
Figure 4.1: Existing Electrical System of Lamjung District
4.1 Existing System Result
Existing system analysis will help in finding out the present performance and make us able to
compare with different options of addition of hydro power plant or addition of bulk load. Three
area substations Dumre S/S, Udipur S/S and Anbu S/S and one grid substation, Damauli S/S
will be affected by addition of upcoming SHP. Load flow is carried out for different loading
condition.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
21
Case I : Full Load
In 100% load, i.e. 15 MVA (sum of full load of three substation, 13.5 MW at 0.9 pf), swing
bus- Damauli substation will generate 14.83 MW including line losses. Maximum voltage drop
is at Udipur which is 13.68 % i.e. voltage at Udipur is only 28.486 kV. In this case Damauli-
Dumre line section is over loaded, 106.23%. The result of Netbas Simulation for full load case
is tabulated below.
Table.4.1: Full Sub Stations Load, Existing System
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 14.83 MW, 8.32 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 13.5 MW, 6.58 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 1.33 MW, 1.74 Mvar
Total % of transmission Loss 8.97 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 13.68 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 106.23%
Case II: 70 % Load
In 70% load, i.e. 10.5 MVA (9.45 MW at 0.9 pf), the swing bus, Damauli substation will
generate 10.045 MW including line losses. Maximum voltage drop is at Udipur which is 9.11%
i.e. voltage at Udipur is only 29.995 kV. In this case Damauli- Dumre section is heaviest loaded
line, 71.22 %. The result of Netbas Simulation for this case is tabulated below.
Table.4.2: 70 % Substations Load, Existing System
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 10.045 MW, 5.39 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 9.45 MW, 4.61 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.6 MW, 0.78 Mvar
Total % of transmission Loss 6.35 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 9.11 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 71.22%
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
22
Case III: 50 % Load
In this case all three area substations are considered to be operated in half load only. Total
generation in Damauli S/S is 7.04 MW including losses 0.29 MW in all line sections and the
total load of all substations is 6.75 MW. The maximum voltage drop is 6.71 % at Udipur S/S,
which is 30.92 kV. The heaviest loaded line is Damauli-Dumre, 49.6%.
Table 4.3: 50% Substations Load, Existing System
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 7.04 MW, 3.67 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 6.75 MW, 3.29 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.29 MW, 0.38 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 4.12 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 6.31 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre,49.6%
Case IV: 30 % Load
In this test case all substations are considered to be running in 30% loading. Total power drawn
from Damauli S/S is 4.15 MW including 0.099 MW losses in all line sections. The maximum
voltage drop is 3.69 % at Udipur which is 31.78 kV. In this case also the heaviest loaded line is
Damauli- Dumre, 29.06%.
Table.4.4: 30 % Substations Load, Existing System
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 4.15 MW, 2.01 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 4.05 MW, 1.97 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.099 MW, 0.13 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 2.38 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 3.69%, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 29.06%
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
23
Case V: 10 % Load
In this test case all substations are considered to be running in 10 % loading. Total power drawn
from Damauli S/S is 1.36 MW including 0.01 MW losses in all line sections. The maximum
voltage drop is 1.2 % at Udipur which is 32.605 kV.
Table4.5: 10 % Substations Load, Existing System
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 1.36 MW, 0.67 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 1.35 MW, 0.66 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.01 MW, 0.14 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 0.74 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 1.2%, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre,
Case VI: 100% load with Wolf
In full load capacity, with conductor wolf the total system loss is 6.05% which is
unacceptable and the voltage drop is 10.41%, so the existing system will be inefficient even if
conductor wolf is used.
Table 4.6: 100% Substations load with 'wolf', Existing system
Conductor Wolf
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 14.37 MW, 8.15 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 13.5 MW, 6.58 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.87 MW, 1.57 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 6.05 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 10.41 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre
Case VII: 80% load with Wolf
In 80% load capacity the total line loss is 4.5% and maximum voltage drop is 8.1%. Generation
at Damauli S/S is 11.31 MW and total substation load is 10.8 MW.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
24
Table 4.7: 80% Substations load with 'wolf', Existing system
Conductor Wolf
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 11.31 MW, 6.215 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 10.8 MW, 5.26 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.511 MW, 0.952 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 4.5%
Max. Voltage Drop and location 8.1 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 56.45%
Case VIII: 50% load with Wolf, Existing System
In this case the system performance is within acceptable limits. The voltage regulation of
4.88% and total transmission loss of 2.8% with total generation of 6.95 MW at slack bus makes
the system quite normal.
Table 4.8: 50% Substations load with 'Wolf', Existing system
Conductor Wolf
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 6.95 MW, 3.64 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 6.75 MW, 3.3 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.195 MW, 0.35 Mvar
Total % of Transmission Loss 2.8 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 4.88 %, Udipur
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre,49.0%
Discussion: Existing Electrical Network
Usually the substation capacity is determined from the peak load forecast of 15th year from the
date of its construction. The analysis of system is carried out for different loading condition in
the substations. From load flow analysis using Netbas simulation it is found that transmission
capacity of Damauli- Dumre 33 kV transmission line is 13.5 MW without over loading. Full
capacity of this line cannot be used because of poor voltage regulation (13.68 %) and
transmission loss (8.97 %). From Case III Transmission Margin is 7 MW. If the total load
demand exceeds 50%- case III, then the total transmission loss exceeds 4% and in this case the
total power drawn from Damauli S/S (swing bus) is 7 MW. For Case I, II and III, there is no
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
25
Available Transmission Capacity in existing system because total line loss is more than 4%. In
case IV the total line loss is only 2.38% so more power can be drawn from Damauli S/S
therefore ATC is 2.54 MW and in case V ATC is 5.68 MW.
As the existing system performance using conductor dog is very inefficient when the load
demand exceeds 50% of total substation capacity. Therefore for better performance conductor
with higher cross section shall be used. Analysis of system performance using conductor wolf
shows that the existing system will be acceptable up to load demand of 80% of total
substation capacity. By changing the existing conductor "Dog" with conductor "Wolf" the
transmission margin can be increased to 11 MW.
4.2 KHP Evacuation System
This section shows the analysis for Khudi Hydro Plant (KHP) power evacuation. As Lower
Nyadi Hydro Project (LNHP) is also coming in near future so the Khudi Switching Station will
connect both power sources and feed down to Damauli S/S through Udipur S/S and Dumre S/S.
First step is to analyze transmission system of KHP up to Khudi Switching station (KSw/S) and
then Udipur S/S using spreadsheet calculation. Transmission line from KHP to Khudi
switching station is only 0.9 km and this line will be used only for transferring power from
KHP to Khudi switching station. From spread sheet calculation in 33 kV voltage level
conductor Beaver, Dog, Wolf and Panther is found to be technically feasible but
financial analysis shows that conductor Wolf is the best having lowest NPV of Investment
(inclusive of losses, O&M and outages over the period of 25 years). The spread sheet result is
tabulated below:
Table 4.9: Spread Sheet Calculation for KHP Evacuation System
Technical Part
Conductor Beaver Dog Wolf Panther
Line Length (km)
0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Receiving End Voltage (kV) 32.95 32.96 32.97 32.97
Voltage Regulation (%) 0.23 0.13 0.1 0.09
Line Losses (kW) 4.80 3.44 2.3 1.72
% transmission loss 0.2 0.1 0.07 0.05
Line Efficiency (%): 99.86 99.9 99.93 99.95
Power Delivered (MW) 3.49 3.49
Economical Part
NPV of Investment inclusive of losses,
O&M and outages (NRs.'000)
1556 1375 1335 1378
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
26
Conductor and Voltage Optimzation
300
800
1300
1800
2300
2800
3300
3800
4300
4800
1 Mw 2MW 3MW 4MW 5MW
Peak Load [MW]
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
C
o
s
t
[
k
N
R
s
.
]
Weasel_33
Rabbit_33
Beaver_33
Dog_33
Tiger_33
Wolf_33
Lynx_33
Panther_33
Figure 4.2: Conductor Selection for KHP evacuation
Before LNHP connected to the Khudi Switching Station KHP will get connected in Udipur
Substation through 14km long 33 kV transmission line from Khudi Switching Station to
Udipur S/S. Now in this case the total transmission length is 14.9 km and spread sheet
calculation shows that conductor "Wolf" is best and have lowest NVP of Investment. The
details of spread sheet result are tabulated below.
Table.4.10: Spread Sheet calculation for KHP Evacuation System
Technical Part
Conductor Beaver Dog Wolf Panther
Line Length (km) 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9
Power to be Transmitted (MW) 3.50 3.50 3.5 3.5
Receiving End Voltage (kV) 32.11 32.29 32.44 32.52
Voltage Regulation (%) 2.71 2.16 1.69 1.44
Line Losses (kW) 79.48 56.90 38.16 28.45
% transmission loss 2.21 1.59 1.07 0.8
Line Eficiency (%): 97.79 98.41 98.93 99.2
Power Delivered at the load end (MW) 3.41 3.43 3.45 3.46
Economical Part
NPV of Investment inclusive of Losses,
O&M and Outages (NRs.000) 25696 22717 22083 22803
For studying the affect of connecting KHP to Udipur S/S Netbas Simulation is used. Power
from KHP will get grid access at Udipur S/S and will feed power to local area through 33/11
Wolf_33
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
27
kV Udipur S/S. The excess power is transmitted to Dumre S/S and feed power there also and
finally excess power will be transmitted to Grid. Netbas Simulation is carried out for studying
the following system performance under different loading condition of Substations.
Figure 4.3: KHP Evacuation System
Case I: Full load
In full load, i.e. 15 MVA (13.5 MW at 0.9 pf), swing bus i.e. Damauli substation will generate
10.73 MW including line losses. Power generation from Khudi Power plant is 3.5 MW.
Maximum voltage drop is at Anbu Khaireni which is 8.66 % i.e. voltage at Anbu Khaireni is
only 30.14 kV. In this case Damauli- Dumre line section is heaviest loaded with 73.58%. The
result of Netbas Simulation for full load case is tabulated below.
Table.4.11: Full Load, KHP Power Evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 10.73MW, 4.85 Mvar
Total Generation 14.23 MW, 7.7 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 13.5 MW, 6.58 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.68 MW, 0.9 Mvar
% of total transmission line loss 4.77 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 8.66%, AnbuKhareni
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 73.58%
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
28
Case II: 70% load
In 70% load, i.e. 10.5 MVA (9.45 MW at 0.9 pf), the swing bus, Damauli substation will
generate 6.27 MW including line losses. Power generation from KHP is 3.5 MW. Maximum
voltage drop is at AnbuKhaireni which is 5.75 % i.e. voltage at AnbuKhaireni is only 31.1 kV.
In this case Damauli- Dumre section is heaviest loaded line, 45.7 %. The result of Netbas
Simulation for this case is tabulated below.
Table.4.12: 70 % Substation Load, KHP Powe r Evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 6.27 MW, 3.76 Mvar
Total Generation 9.77 MW, 5.15 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 9.45 MW, 4.61 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.29 MW, 0.38 Mvar
% of total transmission line loss 2.97 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 5.75%, AnbuKhareni
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 45.7%
Case III: 50% load
In this case all three area substations are considered to be operated in half load only. Total
power drawn from Damauli S/S is 3.44 MW including losses 0.16 MW in all line sections and
the total load of all substations is 6.75 MW (at 0.9 pf). Power generation from KHP is 3.5 MW.
The maximum voltage drop is 3.94% at AnbuKhaireni S/S, which is 31.70 kV. The heaviest
loaded line is KHP-Khudi Sw/S, 30.91%.
Table.4.13: 50 % Substation Load, KHP Power Evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 3.44 MW, 3.15 Mvar
Total Generation 6.94 MW, 3.64 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 6.75 MW, 3.3 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.16 MW, 0.21 Mvar
% of total transmission line loss 2.3 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 3.94 %, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line KHP-Khudi Sw/S,30.91 %
Case IV: 30% load
In this case all substations are considered to be running in 30% loading. Total power drawn
from Damauli S/S is 0.69 MW including 0.11 MW losses in all line sections. Power generation
from KHP is 3.5 MW. Power generation from KHP is 3.5 MW. The maximum voltage drop is
2.21 % at AnbuKhaireni which is 32.27 kV. In this case also the heaviest loaded line is
KHP-Khudi Sw/S, 30.8 %.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
29
Table.4.14: 30 % Substation Load, KHP Power Evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 0.69 MW, 2.64 Mvar
Total Generation (MW) 4.19 MW, 2.26 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 4.05 MW, 1.97 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.11 MW, 0.15 Mvar
% of total transmission loss 2.62 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 2.21%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line KHP-Khudi Sw/S, 30.8%
Case V: 10% load
In this case all substations are considered to be running in 10 % loading. Total power fed to
Damauli S/S is 1.98 MW including 1.43 MW losses in all line sections. Power generation from
KHP is 3.5 MW. The maximum voltage drop is 0.55 % at AnbuKhaireni which is 32.82 kV. In
this case also the heaviest loaded line is KHP-Khudi Sw/S, 32.39%.
Table.4.15: 10 % Substation Load KHP Power Evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) -1.98 MW, 2.21 Mvar
Total Generation 1.53 MW, 1.0 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 1.35 MW, 0.66 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.143 MW, 0.19 Mvar
% of total transmission line loss 9.34 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 0.55%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line KHP-Khudi Sw/s, 32.39%
Case VI: 100% load with conductor wolf
As from economical analysis conductor wolf is the best one. Using this conductor the total
transmission loss is 3.42%. Maximum voltage drop is 7.33% only. The power drawn from
Damauli S/S is 10.52 MW and power generation from KHP is 3.5 MW.
Table.4.16: 100% Load with 'Wolf', KHP power evacuation
Conductor Wolf
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 10.52MW, 5.23 Mvar
Total Generation (MW) 14.02 MW, 7.62 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 13.5 MW, 6.58 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.48 MW, 0.84 Mvar
% of total transmission loss 3.42 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 7.33%, AnbuKharireni
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 73.4%
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
30
Case VII: 50% load with conductor wolf
In this case using wolf conductor the system performance is very much improved. The total
line loss is only 1.62% and maximum voltage drop is 3.41% at AnbuKhaireni.
Table.4.17: 50% Substation Load with 'Wolf', KHP power evacuation
Conductor Wolf
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 3.39 MW, 3.11 Mvar
Total Generation (MW) 6.89 MW, 3.62 Mvar
Total voltage independent load 6.75 MW, 3.29 Mvar
Total Loss in line sections 0.112 MW, 0.196 Mvar
% of total transmission loss 1.62 %
Max. Voltage Drop and location 3.41%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line KHP-Khudi Sw/S, 30.94%
Effect in NEA line:
Udipur S/S is feeding in Lamjung district through outgoing four feeders. Power source for this
S/S is Damauli grid S/S 34.4 km away. KHP, on the other hand is only 14 .9 km away from
Udipur S/S and connecting 33 kV transmission line from KHP to Udipur will change the
existing electrical system. Existing transmission line sections are Udipur S/S to Dumre S/S
(USS to DuSS), Dumre SS to Damauli SS (DuSS to DaSS) and Dumre SS to AkSS (Dumre SS
to Anbu Khaireni SS).
Case I: 100 % loading
With addition of KHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing section of NEA has improved
also voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in these line sections
reduce from 1.326 MW to 0.606 MW. The maximum voltage drop in Dumre Damauli section
has also improved from 10.29 % to 6.61 %. The result shows that if KHP is connected then
Udipur, Anbu Khaireni and Damauli S/Ss can be run in full load without violating the voltage
regulation and efficiency limits. The result from Netbas Simulation is tabulated below.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
31
Table.4.18: 100% Substation Load, effect in existing system with KHP.
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
(kW)
New Line
Loss
(kW)
Previous V
Drop %
New
V Drop %
1 USS to
DuSS
20 170.06 7.88 5.03 0.408
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 1058.17 507.74 10.29 6.61
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 97.92 91.13 2.92 2.69
Total 1326.15 606.75
Case II: 70% loading
After addition of power from KHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing section of NEA
has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in these lines
sections reduce from 0.594 MW to 0.238 MW. The maximum voltage drop in Dumre
Damauli section has also improved from 6.63 % to 4.26 %. The result shows that if KHP is
connected then Udipur S/S, Anbu Khaireni S/Ss and Damauli S/S can be run without violating
the voltage regulation and efficiency limits. The result from Netbas Simulation is tabulated
below.
Table.4.19: 70% Substation Load, effect in existing system with KHP.
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
New Line
Loss
Previous V
Drop
New
V Drop
1 USS to
DuSS
20 75.15 1.17 3.17 1.91
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 475.6 195.75 6.63 4.26
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 43.95 41.94 1.85 1.76
Total 594.7 238.86
Case III: 50 % loading
After addition of power from KHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing section of NEA
has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in these lines
sections reduce from 0.288 MW to 0.111 MW. The maximum voltage drop in Dumre
Damauli section has also improved from 4.51% to 2.84 %. The result shows that if KHP is
connected then Udipur S/S, Anbu Khaireni S/Ss and Damauli S/S can be run in without
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
32
violating the voltage regulation and efficiency limits. The result from Netbas Simulation is
tabulated below.
Table.4.20: 50% Substation Load, effect in existing system with KHP.
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
New Line
Loss
Previous V
Drop
New
V Drop
1 USS to
DuSS
20 36.09 10.93 2.13 0.05
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 230.59 79.61 4.51 2.84
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 21.29 20.6 1.25 1.21
Total 287.97 111.14
Case IV: 30 % Loading
After addition of power from KHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing section of NEA
has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in these lines
sections reduce from 0.098 MW to 0.064 MW. The maximum voltage drop in Dumre
Damauli section has also improved from 2.58 % to 1.53 %. The result shows that if KHP is
connected then Udipur S/S, Anbu Khaireni S/Ss and Damauli S/S can be run in without
violating the voltage regulation and efficiency limits. The result from Netbas Simulation is
tabulated below.
Table.4.21: 30% Substation Load, effect in existing system with KHP
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
New Line
Loss
Previous V
Drop
New
V Drop
1 USS to
DuSS
20 12.29 30.32 1.19 0.21
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 79.22 27.24 2.58 1.53
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 7.31 7.15 0.71 0.71
Total 98.82 64.71
Case V: 10 % Loading
After addition of power from KHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing section of NEA
has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in these lines
sections increase from 0.01 MW to 0.091 MW. The maximum voltage drop in
DumreDamauli section has also improved from 0.82 % to 0.33 %. Unlike other cases the
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
33
result shows that in lightly loaded condition system performance is better with out KHP. The
result from Netbas Simulation is tabulated below.
Table 4.22: 10% Substation Load, effect in existing system with KHP.
S.No Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
New Line
Loss
Previous V
Drop
New
V Drop
1 USS to
DuSS
20 1.3 58.17 0.38 0.37
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 8.43 32.14 0.82 0.33
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 0.78 0.77 0.23 0.29
Total 10.31 91.48
4.3 Results of LNHP Evacuation System
LNHP to Khudi switching station is about 7 km and this is the only alternative to evacuate
power to grid. Power generation from LNHP is 4.5 MW. This power has to be evacuated to
nearest available grid and that would be Udipur S/S which is 14 km away from Khudi
switching station. New 33 kV, 7 km long transmission line is needed for power evacuation.
From spreadsheet calculation station following results is obtained.
Table 4.23: LNHP evacuation system
Conductor Beaver Dog Wolf Panther
Efficiency 98.65 99.03 99.35 99.51
Voltage Regulation 1.63 1.3 1.02 0.87
% of transmission loss 1.35 0.97 0.65 0.49
NPV of Investment 16,780 14,163 12,854 12,664
Details of spread sheet calculation are presented in Appendix D. Conductors "Panther" is
recommended because of lowest investment.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
34
Conductor and Voltage Optimzation
Panther_33
Panther_33
Panther_33
Panther_33
Panther_33
300
800
1300
1800
2300
2800
3300
3800
4300
4800
1 Mw 2MW 3MW 4MW 5MW
Peak Load [MW]
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
C
o
s
t
[
k
N
R
s
.
]
Weasel_33
Rabbit_33
Beaver_33
Dog_33
Tiger_33
Wolf_33
Lynx_33
Panther_33
Figure 4.4: Conductor Optimization chart for LNHP only
Discussion:
From technical analysis conductors beaver, dog, wolf and Panther all are acceptable but
from conductor optimization chart in Figure 6: for evacuating power of 4.5 MW conductor
Panther will be economical.
4.4 KHP and LNHP Evacuation system
Power Evacuation from Khudi Hydro Power and Nyadi Hydro Power will be more fruitful if
certain portion of power can be consumed locally. The priority is given for local consumption
because such small hydro power plant located very far from grid access. After connecting NHP
and KHP at Khudi switching station the total power will be directly fed to 5 MVA, 33/11
Udipur substation through 14 km long 33 kV new transmission line and excess power after
satisfying local demand in Udipur substation will be fed to Dumre Substation through 20 km
long existing 33 kV transmission line and the rest at 132/33/11 kV, Damauli Grid Substation
through 14.5 km long 33 kV existing transmission line. From spread sheet calculation for
power transmission in 33 kV level and 66 kV level from Khudi Switching station to Udipur
Substation following results are obtained.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
35
Table 4.24: LNHP and KHP 14 km long 33 kV transmission line
Conductor Employed Dog Wolf Panther Lion
Line Length (km) 14 14 14 14
Power to be Transmitted (MW) 8
8 8 8
Receiving End Voltage (kV) 31.27 31.65 31.84 31.91
Voltage Regulation (%) 5.24 4.10 3.51 3.31
Line Losses (kW) 353.54 237.06 176.77 157.23
% transmission loss 3.77 2.56 1.92 1.71
Line Eficiency (%): 96.23 97.44 98.08 98.29
Power Delivered at the load end (MW) 8.62 8.74 8.80 8.82
NPV of Investment inclusive of Losses,
O&M and Outages. (NRs.000)
78,395 60,528 52,264 50,009
Table 4.25: LNHP and KHP 14 km long 66 kV transmission line
Conductor Employed Dog Wolf Panther Lion
Line Length (km) 14 14 14 14
Power to be Transmitted (MW) 8
8 8 8
Receiving End Voltage (kV) 65.10 65.29 65.39 65.42
Voltage Regulation (%) 1.37 1.08 0.93 0.88
Line Losses (kW) 88.38 59.27 44.19 39.31
% transmission loss 0.97 0.65 0.48 0.43
Line Eficiency (%): 99.03 99.35 99.52 99.57
Power Delivered at the load end (MW) 8.89 8.92 8.93 8.94
NPV of Investment inclusive of Losses,
O&M and Outages. (NRs.000)
44,876 42,255 41,883 42,185
In this case conductor dog, wolf , panther and lion all can be used because all satisfy the
prescribed technical criteria but if better efficiency and voltage regulation is to be considered
then higher conductor is to be chosen. From conductor optimization chart 66kV conductor
'Panther' is the best option for power evacuation.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
36
Conductor and Voltage Optimzation
Panther_66
300
800
1300
1800
2300
2800
3300
3800
4300
4800
1 Mw 2MW 3MW 4MW 5MW 6 MW 7MW 8 MW 9 MW
Peak Load [MW]
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
C
o
s
t
[
k
N
R
s
.
]
Weasel_33
Rabbit_33
Beaver_33
Dog_33
Tiger_33
Wolf_33
Lynx_33
Panther_33
Dog_66
Wolf_66
Panther_66
Lion_66
Figure 4.5: Conductor and Voltage selection for KHP and LNHP
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
37
Discussion:
Although for transmitting 15 MW power from KSw/S to Udipur S/S 66 kV, conductor
'Panther' is most economical, it is only for transmission line. If 66 kV is chosen the
substation cost will make the NPV of Investment greater than transmission system with
conductor 'Dog'.
Netbas Result:
Netbas Simulation gives us the clear picture of system performance during full load, normal
load and off load. For analyzing existing system performance load flow is carried out for
100% load, 50% load and 10% load of substation capacity. The result is presented below
Figure 4.6: KHP and LNHP evacuation system
Case I: Full Load
In full load, i.e. 15 MVA (13.5 MW at 0.9 pf), swing bus i.e. Damauli substation will
generate 6.33 MW including line losses. Power generation from KHP and LNHP are 3.5
MW, 4.5 MW respectively. Maximum voltage drop is at Anbu Khaireni which is 7.95 % i.e.
voltage at Anbu Khaireni is only 30.37 kV. In this case Damauli- Dumre section is heaviest
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
38
loaded line with 57.35 %. The result of Netbas Simulation for full load case is tabulated
below.
Table.4.26: 100% substation load, KHP and LNHP power evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 6.33 MW, 6.68 MVAR
Total Generation 14.33 MW, 7.33 MVAR
Total voltage independent load 13.5 MW, 6.53 MVAR
Total Loss in line sections 0.739 MW, 0.971 MVAR
% of Total Transmission Loss 5.15%
Max. Voltage Drop and location 7.95%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line Damauli- Dumre, 57.53%
Case II: 70% load
In 70% load, i.e. 10.5 MVA (9.45 MW at 0.9 pf), the swing bus, Damauli substation will
generate 2.15 MW including line losses. Power generation from KHP and LNHP are 3.5
MW and 4.5 MW respectively. Maximum voltage drop is at AnbuKhaireni which is 5.38%
i.e. voltage at AnbuKhaireni is only 31.22 kV. In this case Khudi Sw/S-Udipur S/S section
is heaviest loaded line, 49.91%. The result of Netbas Simulation for this case is tabulated
below.
Table 4.27: 70% substation load, KHP and LNHP power evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) 2.15 MW, 6.14 MVAR
Total Generation 10.15 MW, 5.73 MVAR
Total voltage independent load 9.45 MW, 4.58 MVAR
Total Loss in line sections 0.607 MW, 0.796 MVAR
% of Total Transmission Loss 5.98%
Max. Voltage Drop and location 5.38%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line Khudi Sw/S-Udipur SS, 49.91%
Case III: 50% load
In this case all three area substations are considered to be operated in half load only. Total
power fed to Damauli S/S is 0.53 MW including losses 0.63 MW in all line sections and the
total load of all substations is 6.75 MW (at 0.9 pf). Power generation from KHP and LNHP
are 8 MW. The maximum voltage drop is 3.76% at AnbuKhaireni, which is 31.76 kV. The
heaviest loaded line is Khudi Sw/S-Udipur S/S, 50.62%.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
39
Table 4.28: 50% substation load, KHP and LNHP power evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) -0.53 MW, 5.87 MVAR
Total Generation 7.47 MW, 4.45 MVAR
Total voltage independent load 6.75 MW, 3.27 MVAR
Total Loss in line sections 0.63 MW, 0.823 MVAR
% of Total Transmission Loss 7.8%
Max. Voltage Drop and location 3.76%, Anbu
Heaviest loaded line Khudi Sw/sUSS, 50.62 %
Case IV: 30% load
In this case all substations are considered to be running in 30% loading. Total power fed to
Damauli S/S is 3.13 MW including 0.0.724 MW losses in all line sections. Power
generation from KHP and LNHP are 3.5 MW and 4.5 MW respectively. The maximum
voltage drop is 2.2 % at AnbuKhaireni which is 32.27 kV. In this case also the heaviest
loaded line is Khudi Sw/S-Udipur S/S, 52 %.
Table 4.29: 30% substation load, KHP and LNHP power evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) -3.13 MW, 5.67 MVAR
Total Generation 4.87 MW, 3.3 MVAR
Total voltage independent load 4.05 MW, 1.96 MVAR
Total Loss in line sections 0.724 MW, 0.95 MVAR
% of Total Transmission Loss 9.05%
Max. Voltage Drop and location 2.2%, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line Khudi Sw/S-Udipur S/S, 52.01%
Case V: 10% load
In this case all substations are considered to be running in 10 % loading. Total power fed to
Damauli S/S is 5.66 MW including 0.89 MW losses in all line sections. Power generation
from KHP and LNHP are 3.5 and 4.5 MW respectively. The maximum voltage drop is 0.71
% at AnbuKhaireni which is 32.76 kV. In this case also the heaviest loaded line is Khudi
Sw/S-Udipur S/S, 53.96%.
Table 4.30: 10% substation load, KHP and LNHP, power evacuation
Conductor Dog
Generation at Damauli (slack bus) -5.66 MW, 5.54 MVAR
Total Generation 2.34 MW, 2.24 MVAR
Total voltage independent load 1.35 MW, 0.65 MVAR
Total Loss in line sections 0.89 MW, 1.17 MVAR
% of total Transmission Loss 11.125%**
Max. Voltage Drop and location 0.71 %, AnbuKhaireni
Heaviest loaded line KH-1 KH-3, 53.96 %
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
40
Discussion
Using spreadsheet calculation it is found that, to transmit 6.65 MW from Khudi Sw/S to
Damauli S/S, conductor 'Bear' will make total transmission loss reduced to 4.0 %, if it is
used to transmit power from Khudi Sw/S to Damauli S/S. Loss in 14 km line section to
transmit 8 MW from Khudi Sw/s to Udipur S/S is 44.19 kW, loss in 20 km line section to
transmit 7.55 MW from Udipur S/S to Dumre S/S is 142.43 kW and loss in 14.5 km long
transmission from Dumre S/S to Damauli S/S is 80.11 kW resulting total transmission loss
of 266.13 kW.
Effect in NEA line
Case I: 100 % loading
With addition of KHP and LNHP in Udipur S/S, line losses in three existing section of NEA
has improved; also voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced. The total losses in
these line sections reduce from 1.32 MW to 0.63 MW. The maximum voltage drop in
Dumre Damauli section has also improved from 10.29 % to 2.6 %. The result shows that
if KHP and LNHP are connected then Udipur, Anbu Khaireni and Damauli S/Ss can be run
in full load without violating the voltage regulation and efficiency limits. The result from
Netbas Simulation is tabulated below.
Table 4.31: 100% load, effect in existing system, KHP &LNHP evacuation
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous
Line Loss
(kW)
New Line
Loss
(kW)
Previous V
Drop %
New
V Drop
%
1 USS to
DuSS
20 170.06 229.9 5.03 0.45%
2 DuSS to
DaSS
14.5 1058.17 309.8 10.29 2.6%
3 DuSS to
AkSS
12 97.92 89.41 2.92 2.64%
Total 1326.15 629.11
Case II: 70% loading
After addition of power generated from KHP and LNHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three
existing section of NEA has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced.
The total % of transmission losses in these lines sections reduce from 6.3% to 3.6%. The
result from Netbas Simulation is tabulated below.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
41
Table 4.32: 70% load, effect in existing system, KHP &LNHP evacuation
SNo Section Length,
km
Previous Line
Loss kw
New Line Loss, kw
1 USS to DuSS 20 75.15 146.57
2 DuSS to DaSS 14.5 475.6 154.47
3 DuSS to AkSS 12 43.95 41.46
Total 594.7 342.5
Case III: 50 % loading
After addition of power from KHP and LNHP in Udipur S/S line losses in three existing
section of NEA has improved. Voltage drop in these sections has greatly reduced and with
acceptable limit. The total losses in these lines sections increases from 0.288 MW to 0.63
MW. The result from Netbas Simulation is tabulated below.
Table.4.33: 50% load, effect in existing system, KHP &LNHP evacuation
SNo Section Length, km Previous Line
Loss, kw
New Line Loss,
kw
1 USS to DuSS 20 36.09 207.77
2 DuSS to DaSS 14.5 230.59 126.95
3 DuSS to AkSS 12 21.29 20.45
Total 287.97 355.17
Discussion
After addition of power generated from KHP and LNHP the performance of existing line of
NEA (from Damauli S/S to Udipur S/S) has improved for 70% and 100% loading case but
for load 50% and less performance is worse because all the excess power has to be fed to
Damauli S/S which 34.5 km away from Udipur S/S.
4.5 System with KHP, LNHP and LKHP
There is possibility of coming another Hydro Power 500 m away from KSw/S (Khudi
switching station). This new power plant is Lower Khudi Hydro Plant with capacity of 2
MW. There is only one option for evacuating power from LKHP at KSw/S. The system
performance using Netbas Simulation shows that addition of this power plant will make
existing system inefficient. In full load case total transmission loss is 5.33% and maximum
voltage drop is 7.37% at Anbu Khaireni.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
42
Figure 4.7: KHP, LNHP and LKHP evacuation system
Table.4.34: System Performance with KHP, LNHP and LKHP
Substation
Loading
(%)
Total
Generation,
MW
Total loss in line
sections
MW MVar
% of total
transmission
loss
Max. Voltage drop,
location
100 15 0.8 1.048 5.33% 7.37%, AnbuKhaireni
70 10.5 0.901 1.182 8.64% 5.2%, AnbuKhaireni
50 10 1.022 8.64 % 3.81 %
30 10 1.223 12.23 % 2.48 %
Discussion
From above table, only in full load case existing system looks fine but in lightly loaded
condition the system will be worse. Using conductor 'Lion' in new section KSw/S-USS the
total transmission loss can be reduced to 4.68%.
4.6 KHP, LNHP, LKHP and Chame substation
Chame substation is located in Manang district. In Chame the proposed substation size is
1.5 MVA. This S/S is 50 km away from Khudi switching station. Using transmission
voltage 33 kV with conductor 'dog' the system performance is checked in NETBAS
simulation and is tabulated below.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
43
Figure 4.8: Evacuation system with Chame load
Table 4.35 System performances with KHP, LNHP, LKHP and Chame substation
Substations
Total loading
(%)
Total
Generation,
MW
Total loss in line
sections MW
% of total
transmission loss
Max. Voltage
drop, location
(%)
100 15.67 0.75 4.7% 7.34%, Anbu
70 10 0.88 8.77% 3.76%, Anbu
50 10 0.994 9.94 2.39%
30 10 1.22 12.22% 2.48%
Discussion:
In full load, only 5.67 MW power is drawn from Damauli S/S and total generation from
three power plants is 10 MW. From NETBAS calculation the highest loss of 1.22 MW will
occur during 30% of total substation loading i.e. 4.05 kW and the transmission loss in
percentage is 12.22 %. Maximum voltage drop of 7.34 % is at AnbuKaireni.
4.7 Load flow analysis of four feeders of Udipur S/S
Power evacuation from Nyadi Hydro Power (NHP) and Khudi Hydro Power (KHP), to
local consumer is possible with four outgoing feeders of 5 MVA, 33/11 Udipur substation.
The four feeders are Besisahar, Bhoteodar, Okhari and MajhGau with total connected load
(TCL) of 1050 kVA, 1950 kVA, 550 kVA and 450 kVA respectively. Load flow analysis
of these feeders using Carl1.0 for peak load time gives the clear picture of local power flow.
Chapter 4. Results and Discussion
44
The result of load flow analysis of each feeder is given below. Detail result is presented in
Appendix F.
Table.4.36: Load flow result of four feeders of Udipur S/S.
Conductor, km
Feeder
Name
Total
Connected
Load
(kVA)
Total
Power fed
(kW)
Active
Power
Loss
(kW)
Reactive
Power
Loss
(kVar)
Minimum
Voltage
(%)
Dog Rabbit Weasel
Besisahar 1050 973.59
33.39
39.01 93.56 13.4
6.72
16.8
Bhoteodar 1950 1660 100.33
80.48 90.21
16.5 15.9 34.9
Okhari 550 443.68 3.68 2.08 98.9 0 9 18
MajhGau 450 388.39 5.89 3.33 97.38 0 12 20
Discussion:
From load flow analysis of four feeders it is found that feeder Bhoteodar is worst of all,
having minimum voltage (at farthest end) of 90.21% and total feeder loss of 6.04%. This
feeder uses 16.5 km of conductor 'dog', 15.9 km of conductor 'Rabbit' and 34.9 km of
conductor 'Weasel'. To make local power evacuation more effective and efficient during
peak loading, above four feeders should be managed in such a way so that some part of
loads of feeders Besisahar and Bhoteodar should be shifted to Okhari and MajhGau feeder
for better distribut ion system.
Chapter 5. Conclusion and Recommendation
45
CHAPTER 5
Conclusion and Recommendation
For Power Evacuation study, 3.5 MW Khudi Hydro Power (KHP), 4.5 MW Lower Nyadi
Hydro Power (LNHP) and 2 MW and Lower Khudi Hydro Power (LKHP) are selected
from Lamjung district of Gandaki Zone in Western Nepal. In order to carry power
evacuation study a program is developed in spread sheet. This program results in optimized
conductor and voltage level. This spread sheet program is good only for such transmission
line in which there is no addition of load in future. This program is used to study power
evacuation from KHP, LNHP and LKHP. From Netbas Simulation system performance for
different loading case is studied.
KHP, LNHP and LKHP are located to the north of Udipur S/S. So, one switching station at
Khudi which will be the meeting point of transmission lines from three small power plants
is taken for study. From Khudi switching station to Udipur substation 14 km long
transmission line is used. There are three more existing transmission line sections which are
20 km long Udipur-Dumre joining Udipur S/S and Damauli S/S, 14.5 km long
Dumre-Damauli and 12 km long Dumre-AnbuKhaireni. All of these transmission line
sections have conductor Dog and charged at 33 kV. The power evacuated from KHP,
LNHP and LKHP are evacuated to Udipur S/S, Dumre S/S, Anbu Khareni S/S and finally
excess power is evacuated to grid at Damuli Substation.
Existing System
The study shows that the existing system is good only for 50% of total substation capacity
(6.75 MW) considering prescribed transmission loss (4%) and Voltage regulation (10%). It
means the transmission margin is 6.75 MW for Damuli-Dumre transmission section using
conductor Dog at 33 kV system. For this section during 30% of total substation loading
available transmission capacity is 2.45 MW. Changing the existing conductor dog with
wolf the transmission margin can be increased to 11 MW.
KHP Evacuation System
Power evacuation from KHP involves 0.9 km long transmission line from KHP to KSw/S
and 14 km long transmission line from KSw/S to Udipur S/S. The 33 kV evacuating system
with conductor Dog results in 98.41 line efficiency and 2.16% voltage regulation. For
KHP evacuation only 33 kV system with conductor Wolf is best because it has lowest
Chapter 5. Conclusion and Recommendation
46
NPV of Investment. At 100% substations load the voltage regulation and total transmission
loss has improved. Use of 'wolf' conductor in new transmission section is recommended for
better system performance.
KHP and LNHP Evacuation System
Transmission line from LNHP (4.5 MW) is connected to KSw/S through 7 km long
transmission line. For this section with conductor Dog and 33 kV system voltage the line
efficiency is 99.03 and voltage regulation is1.3. Conductor 'Panther' is found to be the best
with lowest NPV of investment. Power generation from KHP and LNHP is 8 MW and this
power is jointly evacuated from KSw/s to Udipur S/S. From spreadsheet analysis 66 kV
system with conductor 'Panther' has lowest NPV of investment. But existing system is 33
kV so changing to 66 kV will not be feasible. In 33 kV system, conductor 'Lion' is found to
be the best. As the existing system is using conductor 'dog' so the analysis using conductor
'dog' shows that in 100% substations load the total transmission loss is 5.15% and in 10%
substations load the total transmission loss is 11.12%. NEA line (from Damauli S/S to
Udipur S/S) has improved for 70% and above loading case but for load 50% and less system
performance is worse because all the excess power has to be fed to Damauli S/S which 34.5
km away from Udipur S/S.
For KHP and LNHP power evacuation 33 kV system with conductor 'Lion' is
recommended.
KHP, LNHP and LKHP Evacuation System
LKHP is only 0.5 km away from KSw/S so the 2 MW power generated will be transmitted
to KSw/S and for this section 33 kV system with conductor 'dog' is good. Now, in KSw/S
power incoming from three power generating stations. From spreadsheet calculation in 33
kV transmission system conductor 'dog' is not good because of poor efficiency 95.85%. In
33 kV system conductor 'Bear' has lowest NPV of Investment and in 66 kV system
conductor 'Panther' is best.
KHP, LNHP, LKHP Evacuation System and Chame Load
Chame S/S is located in Manang district and 50 km away from KSw/S. To transmit power
in 33 kV level conductor 'Beaver' is found to be the best option.
Distribution planning of Udipur S/S
The above evacuation study shows that the system performance will be better if more power
can be consumed locally so the planning upto distribution level is very important for best
Chapter 5. Conclusion and Recommendation
47
local power evacuation. Load flow analysis of four feeders are carried out and it is found
that feeder Bhoteodar is worst of all, having minimum voltage (at farthest end) of 90.21%
and total feeder loss of 6.04 %. This feeder uses 16.5 km of conductor 'dog', 15.9 km of
conductor 'Rabbit' and 34.9 km of conductor 'Weasel'. To make local power evacuation
more effective and efficient during peak loading, above four feeders should be managed in
such a way so that some part of loads in feeder Besisahar and Bhoteodar should be shifted to
other feeder so that addition of new load centers can be done.
Finally, the methodology adopted using computer programs for designing as well as
studying the power evacuation from small hydro power plant is also useful for any other
selected small hydro power plant in any remote area of Nepal.
References
[1] NEA GRID CODE, Nepal Electricity Authority, 2005.
[2] Report on Transmission and System Planning Study, NEA, 2004.
[3] Planning, Economic and Financial Analysis of Rural Electrification and
Distribution System Reinforcement for Districts: Gorkha, Lamjung, Gulmi,
Arghakhanchi and Palpa (Under Package III, Western Development Region)
(VOLUME I), NEA
[4] Planning, Economic Analysis and Detailed Design of Rural Electrification and
Distribution system Reinforcement Final Report Part I: (Planning and Economic
Analysis) For Districts: Parbat, Baglung, Banke and Bardiya (Under Package
IV) NEA, September, 2001.
[5] Paper on, "Simple and efficient method for load flow solution of radial
distribution networks". D.Das, Birla Institute of Technology and Science; D.P
Kothari; Center for Energy Studies, IIT; A. Kalam, Victoria University of
Technology.
[6] M.V. Deshpande, Electrical Power System, Tata McGraw-Hill, 1984
[7] B. R. Gupta, Power System Analysis and Design, S. Chand & Company Ltd.,
2004
[8] Badri Ram & D.N. Vishwakarma, Power System Protection and Switchgear,
Tata McGraw Hill, 1995
[9] William D. Stevenson, Jr., Elements of Power System Analysis, McGraw Hill,
Fourth Edition
[10] Nepal Electricity Authority, Fiscal Year 2004/5- A Year in Review
[11] Nepal Electricity Authority Generation, 3rd Issue, August 2005