DIAGNOSIS:
DIAGNOSED FASTING BG/mg% 80 - <110 POST PRANDIAL BG/mg% 80 - <140 RANDOM BG/mg% 80 - <140
110 - 125
140 - 199
126
200
200
PENGATURAN MAKAN 4
LATIHAN JASMANI 5
PENYULUHAN
OBAT HIPOGLIKEMIK
CANGKOK PANKREAS
Correlation between HbA1c level and mean plasma glucosa levels on multiple testing over 2-3 months
HbA1c 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean plasma glucose (mg/dL) 135 170 205 240 275 310 345
Hasil dari UKPDS: Kontrol yang baik pada DM T2 mampu menurunkan resiko komplikasi
Penurunan1%HbA1c Kematiankarenadiabetes Menurunkanresiko*
21%
Infarkmiokard
14%
1%
Komplikasimikrovaskuler
37%
Gangguanpembuluhdarahperifer
*p<0.0001n=3,642type2diabetespatients
43%
StrattonIMetal.BMJ2000;321:405412
6.30
9.30
12.00
15.00
19.00
21.00
Program Latihan
Teratur (3-4 kali seminggu)
20- 40 menit didahului pemanasan 5-10 mnt dan cool-down 10 mnt
CRIPE:
Continous Rythmis Interval Progresif Endurance
-glucosidase inhibitors
e.g. acarbose
Insulin
regular intermediate/long acting pre-mixed analogs
Glinides/meglitinides
Non-sulfonylureic e.g. repaglinide Amino acid derivatives e.g. nateglinide
Biguanides
e.g. metformin
Thiazolidinediones
e.g. rosiglitazone, pioglitazone
Metformin
How it works
Decreases hepatic glucose output Lowers fasting glycemia
Expected HbA1c ~ 1.5% reduction Adverse events GI side effects Weight effects CV effects
Lactic acidosis (quite rare) Weight stability or modest weight loss Unconfirmed beneficial effect demonstrated in UKPDS
Sulfonylureas
How they work Expected HbA1c reduction Adverse events Weight effects CV effects
Enhance insulin secretion ~ 1.5% Hypoglycemia (but severe episodes are infrequent) ~ 2 kg weight gain common when therapy initiated UGDP suggested potential cause of increased CVD mortality; not substantiated by UKPDS
Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
Length of action
16 24h 10 24h 6 24h 24 72h 6 10h 24h 18 - 24h
Begins of action
2 4h 2 4h 2 4h 2 4h 2 4h 2 4h 2 - 4h
Route of excretion
R = 50%, B = 50% R = 70%, B = 30% R = 80%, B =20% Renal Renal R = 40%, B =60% R = 5%, B = 95%
15
Glinides
How they work Expected HbA1c reduction Adverse events Weight effects CV effects
Stimulate insulin secretion (but differently from sulfonylureas) ~ 1.5% (repaglinide) Hypoglycemia (may be less frequent than some sulfonylureas) ~ 2 kg weight gain common when therapy initiated None mentioned in ADA recommendations
-Glucosidase Inhibitors
How they work Expected HbA1c reduction Adverse events Weight effects CV effects
rate of digestion of polysaccharides in proximal small intestine (primarily lowering PPG levels without causing hypoglycemia)
0.50.8% Increased gas production GI symptoms Weight neutral Unconfirmed report of reduction of severe outcomes in one clinical trial
Thiazolidinediones
How they work Expected HbA1c reduction Adverse events Weight effects CV effects
Increase sensitivity of muscle, fat, and liver to endogenous and exogenous insulin 0.51.4%
Weight gain and fluid retention Increase in subcutaneous adiposity Redistribution from visceral deposits New / worsened CHF or peripheral edema (due to fluid retention) Reduction in some secondary CV endpoints demonstrated in PROactive study
Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
Expected HbA1c 0.51% reduction Adverse events GI side effects (nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea)
Weight loss of ~ 23 kg over 6 months (may be result of GI effects) None mentioned in ADA recommendations
Insulin
How it works Expected HbA1c reduction Adverse events Weight effects CV effects
Direct compensation for lack of insulin sensitivity 1.52.5% Hypoglycemia Weight gain of ~ 24 kg
Beneficial effect on TG and HDL Weight gain may have an adverse effect on CV risks
100
75
Beta Cell Function (%)
IGT
50
Postpandrial Hiperglycemi
25 0 -12 -10
Lebovitz, 2000
-6
-2
10
25
14
Expected in HbA1c 1.5 to 2.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1 to 1.5%a 0.5 to 1.4% 0.5 to 0.8% 0.5 to 1.0% 0.5 to 1.0% ~0.8%
Adapted from Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
GI Side Effects
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X