3.3
3.4
3.5
80
Optimization Procedures ....................................................... 99 3.5.2.1 Network Consistency Analysis .................................. 99 3.5.2.2 Neighbor Planning ................................................. 99 3.5.2.3 Frequency Planning, Scrambling, and Permutation Codes ................................................................. 101 3.5.2.4 Cell Configuration ................................................ 101 3.5.2.5 Load Balancing ..................................................... 102 3.5.3 Requirements of Location and RSS Measurement Accuracies ... 102 3.5.4 Demonstration of an Optimization Project ............................ 103 3.6 VDT for LTE and Fourth-Generation Systems .................................. 104 3.6.1 Advanced System Main Features ........................................... 105 3.6.1.1 Flat All-IP Architecture ......................................... 105 3.6.1.2 Wideband MIMO-OFDM Air Interface ................. 105 3.6.1.3 Usage of Multi-Carriers ......................................... 105 3.6.1.4 Massive Usage of Picocells, Femtocells, and Relays .... 106 3.6.1.5 Cooperation among Network Elements ................... 106 3.6.2 VDT Concept in Advanced Systems ..................................... 107 3.7 Open Issues ................................................................................... 108 3.8 Summary ...................................................................................... 108 References .............................................................................................. 109 3.5.2
3.1 Introduction
The cellular telephone has had a major effect on everybodys life. Since its early days, we have witnessed a larger and larger penetration of the mobile telephone service and it has been quickly adapted as a major means of personal communications. The cellular telephone has continuously evolved over the relatively short years of its existence. From the prestigious car phone of earlier days, use of wireless communications has become ubiquitous and personal. Indoor usage is significantly larger than outdoor usage. It keeps evolving as the current trend is for the data traffic, of which the usage is constantly increasing, and the transition to all-IP (Internet Protocol) networks is the key for the next-generation networks [1, 2]. User demand for higher data rates does not come without its toll. Higher data rates essentially lead to higher bandwidth systems, and the scarcity of spectrum resources makes it necessary to resort to other means to satisfy the higher-capacity demands. These may include adding base stations, increasing the spectral efficiency of the physical layer by various means such as additional antenna [multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)] systems, using diversity and spatial multiplexing to raise the reliability of the wireless channel, and to increase its capacity. One of the most important means used by operators is sophisticated network optimization techniques, which enable adapting the network better to the needs and demands of the users and better exploiting existing resources.
81
The problem of adaptation and optimization is a major one that accompanies the cellular network operator throughout the network lifetime. The operator relies on a variety of information sources, starting from the basic geographic information, market information, network management reports, and customers complaints. Some of the most important sources of information are the measurements taken by the terminals. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of the virtual drive test (VDT), which combines event and other terminal reports together with a location engine for the purpose of network optimization. The idea of using the measurements for network optimization has been introduced in the past [3], in the broader context of self-optimizing networks, which envisions the network using measurements, and expert systems performing self-configuration and self-organization. The strength of the concept stems from the fact that mapping an event to a geographical location provides significant insight into the network performance. Mapping enables the actual geographic real time display of parameters such as pilot chip energy ( E c ), pilot chip energy to interference spectral density ratio ( E c / Io ), and pilot pollution for the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS). Similar parameters for the the long-term evolution (LTE) system or the wireless interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX) system are the received signal strength (RSS) and signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR) as a function of load. The resulting data can be used for network optimization as well, namely tuning the multitude of system parameters to improve the system performance based on some key performance indicators (KPIs). An example of such an optimization project is described next. In this case, the optimization process improved the dropped call rate from 0.66% down to 0.55%. The total traffic supported by the network increased after the optimization by 10%. In the first section, we survey the basic methods used by operators to predict, measure, and monitor the network. The second section introduces the VDT concept and explains the geolocation principles on which it is based. We also present the concept of a full 3D coverage database used as an integral part of the VDT. The third section describes methods for network optimization using the virtual drive tests and the results of such an optimization are demonstrated for an existing cellular network. The fourth section elaborates on the potential of VDT for LTE and futuregeneration systems, and discusses some implementation issues involved. The chapter concludes with a summary and a discussion of open issues.
82
Drive and walk tests are the most common measurement campaigns used by operators [4, 5]. The measurements are aimed to provide an accurate and updated view of the system coverage and interference scenarios; however, in contrast to the actual indoor-dominated usage patterns, most of the drive test data are taken from roads and streets. Thus, information about coverage indoor and, even more importantly, in higher floors is lacking. The coverage of a wireless system is defined as geographic area where the system can provide its service with the acceptable quality at the required availability. This geographic area is traditionally defined as a two-dimensional area covering the region where the system operates. In a computerized network planning tool, this area is partitioned into a set of bins. Obviously, a 2D area representation is not sufficient to describe the actual service conditions experienced by the users within the region, as it does not represent reliably the different operation conditions of users in the same bin. Terminals on the top floors of a multistorey building do not experience the same reception conditions as the ones at the first floor, not to mention the basement. In order to account for buildup areas, a 3D database, for which different bins are allocated to different floors in a building, is much more appropriate. For a bin located within a building, predicting the signal strength involves a calculation of the signal strength as a function of higher antenna height and the building penetration loss. Different bins can also be allocated to roads, in which the reception conditions might be quite different from areas next to them, where the terminals are stationary or move slowly. This 3D coverage is the basis for the virtual drive test concept to be described next. The reception condition in each bin is determined according to the received signal strength at that location from the serving cell or cells, the level of interference from other cells or external sources, and the receiver performance at the specific channel conditions at that area. For a given system and geographical conditions, the main parameters to be estimated are the signal strength of all the signals arriving at a certain point. System performance is further determined as well by the traffic density and demand. Operators use three sources of information to estimate signal strength, and hence deduce the signal to interference and noise ratio: Predictions, based on empirical or deterministic propagation models Measurements by special drive test or walk test equipment Reports from the network, from various interface probes or from the management system
83
the amount of information and the level of details needed for that is so large that it is practically impossible. In order to predict the signal strength, one uses a model that would simplify the calculation. A large variety of models exist. Those models use only limited information of the environment, and they basically differ by the type and level of the information used. As the models are not accurate, a measure of uncertainty has to be added to the prediction. Another factor of uncertainty is the signal fading, which stems from the fact that the user may be moving and the environment may change. Thus, in addition to the propagation model, a fading model should be defined to account for the signal level uncertainty. Comprehensive discussion on the subject can be found in many textbooks, among them [68]. The models are classified into physical models and empirical models. Empirical models, like the Okumura-Hata [9, 10] or COST [11] models are based upon measurement campaigns wherein the path loss is measured in a variety of conditions. Okumuras measurements, for instance, included a set of path loss measurements in the 150-MHz to 3000-MHz frequency bands, limited to ranges between 1 km and 20 km, and antenna heights between 30 m and 200 m at the base station and between 1 m and 10 m at the terminal station. The measurements were performed in various areas to test the path loss estimation in different environments, such as rural, suburban, urban, and dense urban areas. The model provides the median of the measurements made at a given set of conditions, together with uncertainty that was found to be log-normally distributed with a standard deviation of 5 to 8 dB. The empirical models are not specific as they do not refer to a specific propagation path. As such, they do not require knowledge of the terrain, buildings, and other specific geographical information. Another significant drawback is that they are limited to the range of parameters and conditions in which the measurements were taken. Their main usage is for performance estimation (e.g., during the system design phase), and not for planning, monitoring, or optimization. A physical model is based on a physical simplified representation of the environment and it calculates the path loss for this simplified environment. The model that takes into account most of the effects is the ray-tracing model. In this model, the energy emitted by the transmitter antenna to all possible directions is modeled as rays, each presenting a part of the spherical wavefront. The model traces each ray and determines the physical phenomena that affect it as it propagates. Database accuracy (especially ground slopes and land use data) and the extensive computations needed for a comprehensive analysis are major drawbacks for this model, limiting its use to small urban areas. Other physical models go further toward simplification. The knife-edge model, for instance, replaces each obstacle between transmitter and receiver with a very thin, but infinitely wide screen. The model then calculates the diffraction of the electromagnetic wave over such a screen. Physical models require specific geographical information, such as terrain, land use, and building contour and height, and provide
84
a path loss estimation specific to a given location. Unlike the empirical models, they are not limited to a given range of parameters. Signal strength prediction is a very flexible and convenient means for network monitoring and optimization. In fact, prediction is the only way to estimate the performance of a green field deployment. One of the major advantages of predictions is the ability to use it to study the impact of system modifications. For example, the impact of rotating an antenna can be very easily simulated on a computerized planning tool, using prediction. However launching a measurement campaign or a drive test to measure that impact is not so simple. However prediction has its deficiencies. It is, as explained earlier, inherently inaccurate and thus can not be totally relied upon for absolute performance estimation. Actual measurements, such as drive tests, are required.
85
reflecting the actual operation of the network. However, they are typically aggregate of measurements taken from a cell level and above, making it quite difficult to pinpoint a specific problem. On the other hand, some of the network reports include terminal reports. Terminal reports, as collected by the radio network controller or the management system are a valuable source of measurements that can fill in the gaps of drive and walk tests. Among the most significant reports are those made by the terminals in response to some events, such as dropped calls or failed connections. Those reports are important since, once enhanced by a location engine that attributes geographic coordinates to each call, they provide a focused view on problematic areas and enable problem solution and network performance improvement. The usage of terminal reports provides in-situ performance monitoring, as opposed to the in-vitro nature of drive testing. The mobile station of a cellular network is in fact a sensor by its own right. It measures the surrounding base stations (BS) power, and the distance to them. It also measures the spatial and temporal signature of the signals arriving from each BS. Some of the terminals, equipped with GPS (global positioning system), directly measure their positions. The BS is making such measurements as well, on the uplink channel. Those measurements are used mainly for proper operation of the physical layer, or for handover control, and are not always reported back to the network. Those measurements, when available, can be used to determine the terminal position, and thus the report can be turned into a measurement pointthis is the basis of the virtual drive test (VDT).
86
switching center), whereas in next-generation systems, such as LTE [13, 14] and WiMAX [15, 16], the architecture is basically flat and the interfaces between the base stations (eNodeB or BS) and the network are more distributed in nature. Thus, a central point where the required information is concentrated does not necessarily exist. However, those standards are still in development and a solution to this problem might be available. Terminal reports of mobile scanning measurements are made quite frequently (every 480 ms, to be exact) in the case of a GSM terminal. In UMTS, however, reports are limited to events, like call start, dropped call, inter-RAT handover, and so on, which effectively reduce the rate to about once in six seconds. While the GSM terminal reports an average over six RSS readings from neighboring cells, in UMTS, reports average between two and three readings. On the other hand, the delay measurements produced by UMTS are more accurate.
87
of the satellite trajectories needed for calculation and are downloaded from the satellites as auxiliary information. Loss of precision due to multipath problems and the fact that the satellites receiver may not be ideally located, could mean the resulting location determination may be erroneous (geometrical depletion of precision effect). Not all terminals are equipped with GPS, which reduces the number of measurements and consequently the quality of network optimization based on it. The network may assist the GPS-equipped terminals in several ways. For example, it can transmit the ephemeris almanac data from the base station, thus shortening the time for first fix. GPS signals can also be transmitted by indoor base stations, mimicking the GPS operation and enabling indoor location. An important technique, which can be utilized by a cellular network is differential GPS, in which a fixed and known receiver is used to correct for system biases in a certain area. The corrections are applied to terminals, thus improving their accuracy. Despite the problems mentioned here, one can certainly state that GPS-based location, especially if enhanced by assisted GPS (AGPS), can provide a very good basis for optimization.
88
500
1000
3000
3500
very large range of actual measurements. This very real picture shows that a single measurement made by a terminal is not very reliable. On the other hand, the roundtrip time (RTT) measurement, standardized especially for location-based services is made with an accuracy of 1/16 of a chip, which is translated to about 5-m resolution, so accuracy is mainly a result of propagation effects. For the purpose of network optimization it is important to note that for complete statistics it is necessary to locate terminals even without dedicated measurements. Another factor that should be taken into account is the ability of a terminal to measure the delay to a number of base stations, so that a location fix can be made. Figure 3.2 depicts the probability that a given number of cells were reported by a GSM or UMTS terminal. The graph was made using statistics of a large number (a few million) of actual terminal reports. It should be noted that for UMTS, the number of measured cells is higher than the active set size. This is the hearability problem of distant base station signals. It can be solved by adding idle periods, with the penalty of reducing the time allocated to payload communication. Similar problems may be encountered in LTE and WiMAX systems, since both, as is the case for CDMA-2000 and UMTS systems, are expected to operate in a single frequency environment.
89
1 0.9 0.8 Cumulative probability 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 2 5 3 4 Number of measured cells 6 7 UMTS GSM
techniques has been the fact that additional antennas and signal processing equipment are required to be installed at the base station, which made this solution quite costly. In the next-generation systems, such as LTE and WiMAX, it is envisioned that the base stations, as well as the terminal stations will be equipped with antenna arrays to make use of the MIMO spatial multiplexing techniques. Those arrays can well be used for the purpose of location. However, some problems exist in the implementation of those techniques. Low measurement resolution, due to a low number of antennas and a relatively small span of the antenna arrays, leads to low measurement accuracy. Multipath effects result in a distributed direction of arrival for a single signal. Furthermore, if elevation information is needed to locate terminals at high areas and high floors, additional antenna array and more complex processing is needed. The additional elevation array does not contribute to enhanced spatial multiplexing capability, and thus it is not cost effective. Presently, angle measurements is not used as a primary technique for location. However, those techniques might develop to be very useful, as they are enhanced with geographical information and advanced angle determination techniques that make use of the signal properties as well as high-resolution angular spectrum estimation.
90
virtual drive tests can be created instead of predictions, thus providing a better reference for the RSS at any point. The received signal strengths as measured by the terminal at given locations creates a fingerprint that can be compared to the fingerprint of the measured or predicted results. Figure 3.3 shows the fingerprint of a mobile unit at a location, which includes the set of RSS measured to all the neighboring cells. Prediction-based location has the advantage that no additional equipment or procedures are needed. Another advantage is its ubiquitythe RSS measurements are available indoor and outdoor at lower and upper floors, and may be the only means of distinguishing between measurements made at different heights. Obviously, RSS-based location suffers from the inherent inaccuracy of the prediction process, which can be improved as measurements are accumulated and replace the predictions. It also suffers from fading and measurement inaccuracy. Missing measurements, which can result for various reasons, such as fading, base station malfunction, base station load, and more, can skew the location determination a great deal.
Fingerprint
Mobile unit
91
is also measured. All those measurements provide a lot of information about the terminal environment, which can be deduced by matching the measured pattern to a pattern calculated or measured previously. We shall not elaborate further on those issues, but we will surely see their implementation in the future.
92
Road data can be used in order to associate the vehicle to a road, and then smooth the measurements by tracking it along that road. As mentioned earlier, one of the key factors to a successful virtual drive test is the ability to locate terminals indoor. A terminal reporting an indoor base station (a picocell or a femtocell) as the serving cell is indicative of an indoor terminal, with a location in the vicinity of that cell. The fact that the coverage of such a cell is small provides quite an accurate estimate of its location. Sophisticated location algorithm, using the 3D coverage database, can position a terminal within a floor in a building, as shown in Figure 3.6. In this figure, the location of a specific terminal is within a building. The darkest color shade represents the highest probability of location. Some indoor picocell deployments also include a distributed antenna system (DAS). The DAS makes it more difficult to identify the floor, as the coverage of all the floors is uniform. External signals, from macrocells, that might be picked up by a terminal may serve as an indication of a low or high floor location. As in building terminals served by outdoor base stations, a trial to test the accuracy of locations based on RSS measurements was performed. Location estimations were made for 21,276 calls, with a mean error of 97 m. This is a result of non-calibrated 3D predictions. A histogram of the result is shown in Figure 3.7. The abscissa is the error in location, compared to the actual location of the terminal making the call, while
93
Error (m)
94
the number of calls within each location error bin is shown on the y-axis. Although the error seems to be quite a large one, compared to the average size of buildings, it is quite a good result considering that those are non-calibrated measurements, taken at relatively low SNR conditions.
95
Legend
96
Range
Color
Legend
GPEH events (relative) 10.0% to Max (1%) 7.0% to 10.0% (1%) 6.0% to 7.0% (<1%) 5.0% to 6.0% (1%) 4.0% to 5.0% (1%) 3.0% to 4.0% (1%) 2.0% to 3.0% (3%) 1.5% to 2.0% (3%) 1.0% to 1.5% (4%) 0.5% to 1.0% (7%) Min to 0.5% (5%)
Legend Ec/lo measurements From Min to 16 (342) From 14 to 12 (3609) From 12 to 10 (7411) From 10 to 8 (7090) From 8 to Max (5497)
Date: Time: PropDelay: RefCellName: RefCellCode: Accuracy: IMSt: X: Y: DL_SrvType: UL_SrvType: Type: ?? ?? CallDuration: Event: Moving: ??: RNC??: IndoorName: IndoorX: IndoorY: IndoorDist: CellName1: CellCode1: RSS1: ??1: ??: O1:
05/06/2008 15:50:16 12 EOR142732 27,312 2 0000000000000 133,429.141 171,049.453 Voice 12.2 Voice 12.2 Bid 633,779 10 11 Drop F 4,094 61 0 0 1 EOR142732 27,312 100 13 31,232 7
98
99
perform optimization that is aimed to reduce the drop rate in an area or to be engaged in a more subtle operation like handovers from UMTS to GSM. Prediction-based elements are necessary to complete the weak points of the measured data: Those elements represent and reflect the impact of areas not covered by the network. This is the key contribution of those elements to the optimization process. They emphasize the importance of roads (relative to their weight in the total traffic). The relative importance of a drop while driving is significantly higher compared to such a drop indoor. Cellular operators learned from using mobile measurements for GSM optimization that using measured data alone degrades the overall performance on roads. One way to mitigate this effect is to use propagation prediction-based elements that increase the significance of the roads coverage. Predictions can be used to detect areas where measurements cannot be properly made (e.g., scrambling code collision in UMTS or subcarrier collisions in LTE and WiMAX). This issue is not as clear, but still very important. The combination of the measurements, be they a virtual or real drive test, and predictions, can be done using a simple filtering technique, weighing the prediction with measurement results by the expected accuracy of each technique.
100
1600 1400 1200 Average error (m) 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0
30312 30352
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Figure 3.12 Average error versus number of measurements per cell, Tel-Aviv.
101
the relation was not defined a-priori, meaning actual measurements of the neighbors are missing.
102
would not have been taken into account since drive tests are limited to ground level only. The right-hand side of Figure 3.13 illustrates the case where antenna down tilt would not improve the reception condition of the terminal at the street, as the path is actually a diffraction path across a building. To capture such a case, a 3D propagation model should be used. The model, calibrated by the VDT or actual drive test result, would better predict this situation.
103
104
New relation attempts rank 16 Number of new relation 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 100.00 90.00 13 80.00 12 12 12 11 70.00 10 60.00 8 8 8 8 50.00 7 7 7 6 6 40.00 30.00 4 4 4 20.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.00 0 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 15 Attempt rank per cell Att rank CDF %
Figure 3.15 Neighbor planning resulthistogram by the handover attempt rank per new relation.
Neighbor planning yielded 182 new handover neighbor relations, and proposed the deletion of 72 existing relations, as no handover attempt took place between the neighbors sharing that relation. Figure 3.15 displays a histogram showing the result of the neighbor relation optimization process. The ordinate of the histogram is the rank per attempts of the new proposed relations, and the coordinate is the number of proposed relations that achieved this rank. For example, one of the proposed relations had a rank of 2, namely the number of handover attempts made between the cell in question to the proposed neighbor, which is the second largest of all this cells neighbors. Twenty five percent of the proposed relations were among the nine top choices, in terms of handover attempts. All the proposed relations had handover attempts associated with them. All these data show that the proposed neighbor planning improves the existing network considerably. The key performance index (KPI) for the optimization process was the call drop rate and the traffic volume. Before the process, the network had a call drop rate of 0.66% and after the optimization, the rate went down to 0.55% on a 16% improvement. In addition, the traffic rate went from 69,300 calls per hour up to 76,300 calls per houra 10% increase.
CDF
105
in [2] and the requirements of the new-generation systems as specified in [33]. Although the detailed specifications of IMT-advanced systems have not been made yet, some of their main features are known. The effect and implications of the main features of those systems over the VDT concept will be given next.
106
This feature is the key to the flexibility needed to comply with different regulatory regimes and the requirements present in different markets. It also provides trunking efficiencyas a larger bandwidth is available to a large number of users, high multiplexing gain is achieved.
107
that they include the capability to configure themselves. A network supporting such a capability is a self-organization network (SON) or self-optimization network, and may require further cooperation between the base stations.
108
3.8 Summary
The virtual drive test, a concept that combines terminal reports with terminal positioning techniques, is a powerful tool for network optimization. The VDT provides timely and ubiquitous information about the network users, and thus it presents a real and living picture of network behavior and outlines problems that might exist.
109
The VDT process relies on accurate positioning of terminal reports. Such reports include the measurements made by the mobile terminal during various events. Terminal location can be based upon the cell ID, propagation delay measurements, and signal strength measurements. These data are typically the results of measurements performed by the terminals for normal operation; however, the reports do not always contain all the information. The reports should be frequent enough and contain the necessary data for localization. It is expected that various measurements made by antenna arrays, both at the mobile and at the base station, will be added to provide an even better means of location. Furthermore, a large and increasing number of terminals are equipped with GPS and thus are capable of providing accurate location information. Because cellular communication is ubiquitous and personal, a large part of the traffic takes place indoor. The location capability of a VDT engine should include the ability to perform indoor location. VDT can augment the results obtained by predictions and drive tests, and for a mature system, it can replace them both. However, it is recommended that a combination of measured and predicted data is used for optimization in order to take advantage of both. Network optimization performed for a real network has shown that the VDT can indeed be used for that purpose. The process resulted in a significant improvement of the network. VDT can be viewed as a first step toward self-healing and self-organizing networks. It provides the necessary feedback branch between terminal measurements and network optimization modules. Once the optimization procedures are integrated online as part of the network management and control system, the network can have a self-optimization capability, and adapt better to changing demands and operating conditions. Undoubtedly, in future networks such as LTE, the VDT concept will be a large part of monitoring, maintaining, and optimizing future networks.
References
[1] D. Klaus (ed.), Technologies for the Wireless Future (WWRF), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester UK, 2008. [2] ITU-R Rec. M.1645, Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT-2000 and Systems Beyond IMT-2000. [3] D. Blechschmidt, Self-Optimized NetworksMaking Use of Experts Knowledge and Approved Planning, TM Forum, Nice May 2003 http://www.tmforum.org/MobilityMOB/ 1245/home.html [4] A. J. Mishra, Fundamentals of Cellular Netwrok Planning and Optimisation, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester UK, 2004. [5] J. Laiho, A. Wacker, and T. Novosad, Radio Network Planning and Optimisation for UMTS, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester UK, 2nd ed. 2006. [6] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communication, Principles, and Practices, Prentice Hall, 2002. [7] A. F. Molisch, Wireless Communications, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester UK, 2005. [8] N. Blaunstein, Radio Propagation in Cellular Networks, Artech House, 2000. [9] M. Hata, Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land-Mobile Radio Services, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 29(3), 1980.
110
[10] Y. Okumura et al., Field Strength and its Variability in VHF and UHF Land-Mobile Radio Service, Review of the Electrical Engineering Communication Laboratory, 16(910), 1968. [11] COST 231 Final Report, Digital Mobile Radio Toward Future Generation Systems, COST Telecom Secretariat, Brussels. [12] J. Zhang, D. Yang, A Quantitative Error Analysis for Mobile Network Planning, Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication Technologies, ICCT-2003, Beijing China, vol. 1, pp. 115117, April 2003. [13] 3GPP TS 36.201: Evolved Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); LTE Physical Layer General Description, V8.2.0, December 2008. [14] 3GPP TS 36.401: Evolved Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Architecture Description, V8.4.0, December 2008. [15] IEEE P802.16-2009: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Networks. Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems, January 2009. [16] WiMAX Forum: WiMAX Forum Network Architecture Release 1 v1.2, January 2008. [17] H. L. Bertoni and J. W. Suh, Simulation of Location Accuracies Obtainable from Different Methods, 62nd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC-2005- Fall. 2005, vol. 4, pp. 21962200, 2528 Sept., 2005. [18] Han-Yu Lin, Shih-Cheng Chen, Ding-Bing Lin, and Hsin-Piao Lin, Multidimensional Scaling Algorithm for Mobile Location Based on Hybrid SADOA/TOA Measurement, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2008, WCNC 2008, pp. 3015 3020, April 2008. [19] S. Mingyang, T. Xiaofeng, Z. Qing, and H. Xiao, A Believable Factor and Kalman Filteringbased Mobile Localization Algorithm, 4th IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems for Communications, 2008. ICCSC 2008. pp. 723727, 2628, May 2008. [20] J. M. Borokowski, Performance of CellID+RTT Hybrid Positioning Methods for UMTS, M.Sc. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, January, 2004. [21] E. Kapplan, Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications, Artech House, 1996. [22] M. Pent, M. A. Spirito, and E. Turco, Method for Positioning GSM Mobile Stations Using Absolute Time-Delay Measurements, Electronics Letters, vol. 33, issue 24, pp. 20192020, Nov. 1997. [23] J. C. Liberti, Jr. and T. S. Rappaport, Smart Antennas for Wireless Communications: IS-95 and Third Generation CDMA Applications, Prentice Hall, 1999. [24] M. Hata, Mobile Location Using Signal Strength Measurements in a Cellular System, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol VT-29, no. 2, pp. 245252, May 1980. [25] K. Y. Kabalan and J. L. Mounsef, Mobile Location in GSM Using Signal Strength Technique, Proceedings of the 2003 10th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2003. ICECS 2003, vol. 1, pp. 196199, Dec. 2003. [26] M. J. Nawrocki, H. Aghvami, and M. Dohler, Understanding UMTS Radio Network Modeling, Planning, and Automated Optimisation: Theory and Practice, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 2006. [27] J. Jiang and A. Capone, 3G/4G/WLAN/WMAN Planning and Optimization, IEEE Wireless Communication, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 67, December 2006. [28] A. Eisenblatter and H. F. Geerd, Wireless network design: solution-oriented modeling and mathematical optimization, IEEE Wireless Communication, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 814, December 2006. [29] I. Siomina, P. Varbrand, and D. Yuan, Automated Optimization of Service Coverage and Base Station Antenna Configuration in UMTS Networks, IEEE Wireless Communication, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1625, December 2006.
111
[30] F. Ricciato, Traffic Monitoring and Analysis for the Optimization of a 3G Network, IEEE Wireless Communication, December 2006, pp. 4249. [31] R. Chavez-Santiago, A. Raymond, and V. Lyandres. Enhanced Efficiency and Frequency Assignment by Optimizing the Base Stations Location in a Mobile Radio Network, Wireless Networks Online First, January 2007. [32] F. Gordejuela-S anchez, A. J uttner, and J. Zhang, A Multiobjective Optimization Framework for IEEE 802.16e Network Design and Performance Analysis, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 27. no. 2, February 2009, pp. 202216. [33] ITU-R Report. M.2133: Requirements, Evaluation Criteria, and Submission Templates for the Development of IMT-Advanced, (2008).