STUDENT HANDBOOK
2009-10
Please note:
This handbook is for general guidance only. Content may be subject to change.
Page
1. Introduction 3
2. Programme Management 3
6. Programme Specification 27
Page 2 of 72
1 Introduction
1 Programme Management
Page 3 of 72
Other vital cogs are the Module Leaders who you can contact
with queries relating directly to their module(s).
• Email
• University of Plymouth Student Portal
• College intranet (Moodle)
• Google Calendar
• Higher Education notice board in the HE Suite (1st
floor, Kings Road)
Page 4 of 72
2 Studying at University Level
Page 5 of 72
Probably the most significant difference between university level
study and secondary education is the amount of personal
responsibility you have. This has implications for how you
approach your studies:
This new freedom can be exciting and stimulating but it can also
be worrying, or even frightening at times. You may be used to a
learning or workplace environment with more fixed hours and
routine activities, so your weekly timetable may not appear to be
particularly full. For example, the contact time that you have
with lecturers will be a fraction of the hours that you should
expect to spend on the module as a whole. As an indication, the
average amount of ‘total student effort’ expected for a 20 credit
module will be around 200 hours, but you may only be
timetabled for 60 hours. You must, therefore, learn to use
your time constructively.
3.3.1 Reading
The main libraries are open for 47 hours each per term-
time week and 30 hours between them in vacations.
There are 176 study places at group tables and individual
study carrels and many of these have wi-fi access.
Page 7 of 72
specialising in each area who works with your lecturers to
provide the materials you need. If you want particular
titles added to stock please hand your recommendations
in at a service point. There are also Study Support
Assistants who will help you with the computers and the
range of software, including Web 2.0 resources.
Page 8 of 72
learning will be vital in contributing to your understandings
of theory and your success in assessment tasks. You
should be sure to keep careful records of significant
experiences in your work-placements so that you can
refer to them with confidence in discussions and
assignments.
3.4.1 Lectures
3.2.1 Seminars/Tutorials/Workshops
Page 9 of 72
not so sure about. Normally you will be assigned to a
group and you will have to attend a specific timetabled
slot.
3.2.2 Practicals
Page 10 of 72
3.2.3 Other Academic Support
3.2 Assessment
Page 11 of 72
In all cases these are chosen and designed to assess
your achievement of the particular learning outcomes for
the module. You will be given Assessment Criteria which
are used to judge the extent of your achievement.
Page 12 of 72
• Your attitudes, attendance, aims and goals
• Your dedication
• Your aptitude for the subject
• Your intelligence
• Your willingness and ability to learn
• Your use of resources – tutors, books, materials, the
work experiences built into the programme, etc – and
time – your timetabled lectures and tutorials as well as
private study
3.2.3 Attendance
Page 13 of 72
As you are responsible for your own learning, you have to
take responsibility for attending timetabled sessions. In
some modules if you do not attend consistently you may
risk losing marks, either directly or by missing an
assessed presentation or group activity. You will be
expected to be available for every week of your college
terms. Please ensure that holidays are only arranged
outside of term and assessment commitments.
Page 14 of 72
3.2.6 Learning Skills
Page 15 of 72
• Student Representatives – each programme’s
cohort of students should have one or more
representatives – chosen by their fellow students – to
sit on the Programme Committee. Student
representatives are a VITAL conduit, linking staff and
students so that issues of quality of provision affecting
students can be promptly and appropriately
addressed. In addition, representatives provide
feedback to the programme’s staff on innovations and
can assist the programme team to develop the
curriculum to meet student needs. Students are also
represented on the University of Plymouth Colleges
(UPC) Joint Board of Studies which is responsible for
all the University of Plymouth programmes delivered
at your college. Your college will have a person who
liaises with the University of Plymouth Student Union
who can advise on student representation.
Page 16 of 72
• Greetham, B. (2008) How to Write Better Essays.
Palgrave Study Guides. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Page 17 of 72
Work-based learning, in its various forms, is one of the major
defining characteristics of your Foundation degree. It plays a
central role in enabling you to apply academic study to
workplace environments and problems. In its turn, your
programme of study at Level 5 should enable you to integrate
knowledge and skills developed in work-based learning into your
project work and study of taught modules. Every University of
Plymouth foundation degree has a 20 credit work place learning
module that is assessed at level 4 whenever it takes place in the
programme.
Page 18 of 72
For the purposes of this Handbook, Professional Development
Planning (PDP) is defined as:
Page 19 of 72
opportunity to pinpoint your key strengths and key areas
for improvement.
✔ Learning Style - The quiz in this section helps you
recognise your learning style, a crucial step in increasing
your effectiveness and reaching your potential.
✔ Goals - Setting clear goals for the different areas of your
life can be invaluable. This section allows you to bring
into focus your aspirations in terms of your career, your
academic ambitions and your personal goals.
✔ Planning - Having set your goals, break each one down
into manageable action points. Use this section to get a
clear picture of what you need to do and when. A financial
planning tool is also included.
✔ Opportunities - There are so many opportunities at
College and in the local area, but how do you find out
about them all? This section gives a comprehensive
guide from voluntary work to round-the-world expeditions.
✔ Progress - During your time at College make time to
assess how you are progressing towards your goals.
Even if you only take a few hours each term, it will help to
keep you on target towards achieving your goals and
getting the most out of your time here. At the end of each
academic year pull together all your thoughts and
reassess your progress.
✔ Job Applications - This section contains useful tips on
producing a professional CV. By completing the main
sections of this guide you will already have done much of
the hard work. It pays to keep track of things as you go
along so that you have all the information at your
fingertips when it comes to applying for your next step.
✔ Reference – This section includes a link to your
Reference Summary page. This is the only part of your
file which will be held by your tutor and will contain the
information you want to be included in your references.
Page 20 of 72
potential employees. Please make every effort to attend such
events and to profit from such employer contacts.
Many of your teaching staff will have such knowledge too and
will be able to give you helpful career advice. The College
Careers Service offers information, advice and guidance to
students at all stages of their Foundation Degree and further
advice is available from the University of Plymouth Careers
Service. As a Foundation Degree graduate you will have a wide
choice of career opportunities throughout the private and public
sectors, both in the United Kingdom and abroad. The University
of Plymouth enjoys a good record for the employability of its
graduates.
Level 4
Level 5
Page 21 of 72
Successful work at level 5 will show that you can apply the
knowledge, understanding and skills that your course
has given you more widely, so that you can evaluate the
appropriateness of different approaches to solving
problems in some unpredictable situations. You will be
able to show the qualities necessary for employment in
situations requiring the exercise of personal
responsibility and decision-making and that you can
perform effectively in your chosen field.
Page 22 of 72
FDAP102 EXCAVATION
This module will develop an understanding of the range of
intrusive investigative methods that can be used on
archaeological sites. These methods include surface artefact
collection and excavation.
Page 23 of 72
This module explores the potential of Experimental Archaeology
as a powerful research method, an educational tool and as a
medium for public outreach.
Page 24 of 72
4.6 Indicative Programme Assessment Schedule
Fieldwork: Archae-
Roman Archaeo- Site ology Work-
and Early logical Experimental Manage- and Research Based
w/c Medieval Science Archaeology ment Society Skills Learning
21-Sep-
2009
28-Sep-
2009 Practical
5-Oct-
2009 Reflect
12-Oct-
2009 Ass.1
19-Oct- Practical
2009 25% Report
26-Oct-
2009
2-Nov-
2009 Seminar
9-Nov-
2009 Seminar
16-Nov- Report
2009 25% Seminar Ass 1
23-Nov-
2009 Journal 40.%
30-Nov-
2009 Seminar Proposal
7-Dec-
2009 Seminar Report
14-Dec-
2009 Seminar
21-Dec-
2009
28-Dec-
2009
4-Jan-
2010 Seminar Essay
11-Jan-
2010 Seminar
18-Jan-
2010 Seminar
25-Jan-
2010 Seminar
1-Feb-
2010
8-Feb-
2010 Seminar Present.
15-Feb-
2010 Seminar Ass.2
22-Feb-
2010 40.%
1-Mar-
2010 Ass.2 Report
8-Mar-
2010
15-Mar-
2010
22-Mar-
2010 Present.
29-Mar- Present.
Page 25 of 72
2010
5-Apr-
2010
12-Apr-
2010
19-Apr- Mock
2010 Test Project
26-Apr-
2010
3-May-
2010 Test
10-May-
2010 Test
17-May-
2010 Report
24-May-
2010
If special needs arise, you should let your Personal Tutor know
immediately. Conditions such as dyslexia must be officially assessed,
and he/she can help arrange this. Unless this is done, the College will
not be able to make any special arrangements. (The Programme
Leader has a copy of the college Special Needs policy, if you wish to
refer to it at any stage).
If problems arise...
Page 26 of 72
Student Complaints
6 Programme Specification
On the following pages you will find the specification for your
programme of studies. It is a University of Plymouth Colleges
requirement that this is included in your Student Handbook. Before
reading it, please study the following notes carefully as these will help
you to understand what the programme specification is telling you.
Page 27 of 72
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION FOR FOUNDATION DEGREES
Admissions Criteria:
Page 28 of 72
APEL/APCL possibilities Add See Academic regulations:
Academic Regs link) http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/pages/vie
w.asp?page=11219
Page 29 of 72
Programme Specification
Page 30 of 72
• an ability to present, evaluate, and Primary
interpret qualitative and • Class exercises
quantitative data, to develop lines • Tutorial/seminar discussions
of argument and make sound • Feedback via coursework
judgements in accordance with assessment process (essays etc)
basic theories and concepts of • Interpretation in the field.
their subject(s) of study
• an ability to present critiques of Secondary
rival theories and frameworks, • Policy and practice analysis in
such as culture history, surgeries
processualism and post- • Computer-based practicals on
processualism. data and measurement problems
• An ability to conduct abstract
analysis and synthesis
• An ability to intelligently apply
appropriate principles in assessing
policy or practice
• An ability to interpret
archaeological sites, solve
problems and conduct research.
Page 31 of 72
archaeological situations
• Perform assigned tasks as part of
a team, participating in discussion
• Bring together information and
materials from different sources
• Identify problems and questions
• Undertake the analysis of factual
information
• Recognise weaknesses in the
arguments of others
Page 32 of 72
professional accreditation as prescribed by the Sector Skills Council,
Creative and Cultural Skills Qualification in Archaeological Practice.
• Understanding excavation techniques within a field work context.
• Understanding site management and the risks associated with managing
an archaeological excavation are an important part of this programme
• Students will learn how to deal with the advocacy that surrounds
archaeological investigations.
• Students will learn how to communicate archaeological information to a
range of people from academics to school children.
• Students will acquire vocationally relevant skills through fieldwork and
excavation opportunities provided by employers and the College.
• Practice and theory are intertwined with modules that outline prehistoric
and historical periods to provide a learning experience that is engaging
and professionally relevant.
• This programme addresses specific needs as outlined by employers in
relation to the skills and qualities needed to work in the field as a practising
archaeologist.
Page 33 of 72
Programme Structure and Pathways
None
Page 34 of 72
Programme Structure for the Foundation Degree in
Archaeological Practice (full-time) 2009/10
Course code: UF3578
Year 1 Year 2
Module Module Title No. of Core / Module Module Title No. of Core /
Code Credits Optional Code Credits Optional
FDAP100 Fieldwork: British & Irish 20 Core FDAP107 Work Based Learning 20 Core
Prehistory
FDAP101 Fieldwork: Historical 20 Core FDAP200 Fieldwork: Roman and 20 Core
Archaeology Early Medieval
FDAP102 Excavation 20 Core FDAP201 Archaeological Science 20 Core
FDAP103 History of Archaeological 20 Core FDAP202 Experimental Archaeology 20 Core
Thought
FDAP104 Site Surveying 20 Core FDAP203 Site Management 20 Core
FDAP105 World Stone Age Society 20 Core FDAP204 Archaeology and Society 20 Core
FDAP106 Personal & Professional 20 Core FDAP205 Research Skills 20 Core
Development
Work Based Learning (FDAP107)
Page 35 of 72
Foundation Degree Intended Learning Outcomes Map
Page 36 of 72
Knowledge/ Understanding
• knowledge of the underlying concepts and principles associated The programme is Foundation FDAP100
with their area(s) of study, and an ability to evaluate and interpret intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP101
these within the context of that area of study or principles of their the student with an benchmarks FDAP102
area(s) of study understanding of FDAP103
• knowledge of the chronology of social and technological human society and Archaeology QAA FDAP105
developments in Britain and Ireland. material culture in benchmarks
• Understanding of the principles and methods by which Britain and Ireland
archaeological data are acquired and analysed in the past, and in a
• Knowledge and understanding of the material culture and social world context.
organisations of world cultures.
• Knowledge and understanding of the origins and development of
archaeology as a discipline
• Understanding of the intellectual vitality of archaeology, its
theoretical basis, current debates over approaches to
interpretation, and archaeology’s relationship to other disciplines.
• Understanding of the causes of variation in the reliability of
different classes of evidence from archaeological contexts.
• Knowledge and understanding of the socio-politics of
archaeology.
Page 37 of 72
Cognitive / Intellectual Skills (generic)
• an ability to present, evaluate, and interpret qualitative and The programme is Foundation FDAP100
quantitative data, to develop lines of argument and make sound intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP101
judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of the student with an benchmarks FDAP102
their subject(s) of study ability to conduct FDAP103
• an ability to present critiques of rival theories and frameworks, archaeological Archaeology QAA FDAP105
such as culture history, processualism and post-processualism. investigations by benchmarks FDAP107
• An ability to conduct abstract analysis and synthesis integrating
• An ability to intelligently apply appropriate principles in assessing theoretical and
policy or practice practical
• An ability to interpret archaeological sites, solve problems and approaches.
conduct research.
Page 38 of 72
Key / Transferable Skills (generic)
• evaluate the appropriateness of different approaches to solving The programme is Foundation FDAP100
problems related to their area(s) of study and/or work intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP101
• communicate the results of their study/work accurately and the student with an benchmarks FDAP102
reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments ability to manage FDAP103
• Process documentary, pictorial and other information physical and human Archaeology QAA FDAP104
• Manage one’s own resources resources, to benchmarks FDAP105
• Manage the timings and resources of a project communications, FDAP106
• Communicate using oral, written, or multimedia means and information FDAP107
• Numeracy/quantitative skills technology, and
• Demonstrate awareness of relevant archaeological concepts and social skills
methods in non-archaeological situations appropriate for any
• Perform assigned tasks as part of a team, participating in career.
discussion
• Bring together information and materials from different sources
• Identify problems and questions
• Undertake the analysis of factual information
• Recognise weaknesses in the arguments of others
Page 39 of 72
Practical Skills (subject specific)
• Practise core fieldwork techniques of identification, surveying, The programme is Foundation FDAP100
recording, excavation and sampling. intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP101
• Excavation Techniques the student with the benchmarks FDAP102
• Scientific and technological experiments skills and FDAP103
• Landscape interpretation qualifications Archaeology QAA FDAP104
• Computer and information technology skills necessary to work benchmarks FDAP106
• Express her/himself both orally and in writing at a junior level in FDAP107
• Make oral presentations utilising visual aids Contract
• Demonstrate visual skills in recognising and describing material Archaeology in
remains Britain.
Employment-related skills
• undertake further training and develop new skills within a The programme is Foundation FDAP100
structured and managed environment intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP101
• qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment the student with the benchmarks FDAP102
requiring the exercise of personal responsibility skills and FDAP103
qualifications Archaeology QAA FDAP104
necessary to work benchmarks FDAP106
at a junior level in FDAP107
Contract
Archaeology in
Britain.
Page 40 of 72
Foundation Degree Intended Learning Outcomes Map Level 5
1 Graduate Attributes and Skills 2 3 4
Core Programme Intended Learning Outcomes Aim(s) Subject Related Core
Benchmark Modules
Knowledge/ Understanding
• knowledge and critical understanding of the well established The programme is Foundation FDAP200
principles of this area of study, and the way in which those intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP201
principles have developed the student with an benchmarks FDAP202
• knowledge of the main methods of enquiry in the subject understanding of FDAP204
• an understanding of the limits of their knowledge, and how this human society and Archaeology QAA
influences analyses and interpretations based on that knowledge material culture in benchmarks
• familiarity with the basic concepts which underpin the subject : Britain and Ireland
approaches to typology, taxonomy and ancient technology. in the past, and in a
• knowledge of the chronology of social and technological world context.
developments in Britain and Ireland.
• Knowledge and understanding of the science of artefact and
environmental analysis.
• Appreciation of the social, cultural and political context of
archaeological interpretation.
• Understanding of the use of analogy and experiment in
archaeological analysis
Page 41 of 72
Cognitive / Intellectual Skills (generic) The programme is FDAP200
• ability to apply underlying concepts and principles outside the intended to provide FDAP201
context in which they were first studied the student with an FDAP202
• An ability to conduct abstract analysis and synthesis ability to conduct FDAP204
• An ability to intelligently apply appropriate principles in assessing archaeological FDAP205
policy or practice investigations by
• An ability to interpret archaeological sites, solve problems and integrating
conduct research. theoretical and
practical
approaches.
Key / Transferable Skills (generic) Foundation FDAP202
• ability to evaluate critically the appropriateness of different Degree QAA FDAP203
approaches to solving problems in the field of study; benchmarks FDAP204
• use a range of established techniques to initiate and undertake FDAP205
critical analysis of information, and to propose solutions to Archaeology QAA
problems arising from that analysis benchmarks
• effectively communicate information, arguments, and analysis, in
a variety of forms, to specialist and non specialist audiences, and
deploy key techniques of the discipline effectively
• Manage the timings and resources of a project
• Produce a synthesis of the state of knowledge on a particular
subject or topic
• With guidance, undertake tasks independently
• Demonstrate classification skills in describing, categorising and
collating data.
Page 42 of 72
Practical Skills (subject specific) The programme is Foundation FDAP200
• Site Surveying using GIS intended to provide Degree QAA FDAP201
• Draw down and apply appropriate scholarly, theoretical and the student with the benchmarks FDAP202
scientific principles and concepts to archaeological problems skills and FDAP203
• Practise core laboratory techniques of recording, measurement, qualifications Archaeology QAA FDAP205
analysis and interpretation of archaeological material. necessary to work benchmarks
• Discover and recognise the archaeological significance of in Contract
material remains and landscapes Archaeology in
• Interpret spatial data, integrating theoretical models, traces Britain.
surviving in present-day landscapes, and excavation data.
• Express her/himself both orally and in writing
• Use C&IT to select and present information
• Make oral presentations utilising visual aids
Page 43 of 72
7 UPC - The Student Portal
A portal is a gateway. The University of Plymouth portal is your gateway to various resources to
support your study e.g.:
• UoP Information and Library Services where you can access Metalib which will enable you
to locate a range of journals and electronic resources from the University library
Page 44 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP100 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: FIELDWORK: BRITISH & IRISH PREHISTORY
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module uses the prehistory of Britain and Ireland as a context within which to learn a
range of non-intrusive investigative skills and to develop an understanding of key theoretical
concepts in British prehistory.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
This module aims:
• to train the student in a range of skills applicable in non-intrusive archaeological
investigations
• to provide an appreciation of the chronological framework within which the student can
develop a deeper understanding of the prehistoric archaeology of Britain
• To place this knowledge in the necessary European and World contexts
• To provide each student with an overview of the field monuments of these periods
• To link current understandings of British Prehistory with theoretical approaches and the
history of Archaeological Thought (Module FDAP103)
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of this module the learner will be expected
to:
1. have a knowledge of the current theoretical approaches to the typology, development
and meaning of prehistoric structures and artefacts
2. Present and evaluate evidence of non-intrusive investigations of archaeological sites
through the understanding and use of topographical and aerial survey
3. Develop lines of argument and make sound judgements about prehistoric sites in their
chronological and environmental context.
Page 45 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should provide evidence which:
1. Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of current theoretical approaches to
the typology, development and meaning of prehistoric structures and artefacts
2. Presents and evaluates evidence of non-intrusive investigations of archaeological
sites through the understanding and use of topographical and aerial survey
3. Develops lines of argument and makes sound judgements about prehistoric sites in
their chronological and environmental context.
Assessment Mode:
Coursework: 100%
1. report of 1500 words with original survey drawings and photographs 50%
2. one written assignment of 1500 words 30%
3. reflective journal of 1000 words on field courses.20%
Bradley, R. (2007) The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Collis, J. (2003) Celts: Origins, Myths and Inventions. Stroud: NPI
Cunliffe, B. (1993) Wessex to AD1000. London: Longman.
Cunliffe, B. (2004) Iron Age Britain. London: English Heritage/Batsford.
Drewett, P.L. (1999) Field Archaeology: an Introduction. London: Routledge
Fleming, A. (2007) The Dartmoor Reaves. Macclesfield: Windgather Press
Grant, J, Gorin, S. & Fleming N. (2005) The Archaeology Coursebook London: Routledge
Hunter, J. and Ralston I. (1999) The Archaeology of Britain. London: Routledge
James, S. 1999 The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? London: British
Museum Press.
Malone, C. (2001) Neolithic Britain & Ireland. Stroud: NPI.
Parker Pearson, M. (2005): Bronze Age Britain. London: English Heritage/Batsford.
Internet
Archaeology Data Service http://ads.ahds.ac.uk
Page 46 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP101 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: FIELDWORK: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module uses Historical Archaeology as a context within which to learn theoretical
approaches in archaeology and a range of non-intrusive investigative skills.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
The course will provide students with:
• A range of skills applicable in non-intrusive archaeological investigations
• an outline understanding and theoretical appreciation of the sites, landscapes,
buildings, artefacts and issues of Britain from the Norman Conquest to the Modern
period, in context with the relevant world archaeology.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of a module the learner will be expected to demonstrate:
1. the ability to develop new skills in the recording and analysis of historic landscapes
2. a knowledge and understanding of buildings and portable artefacts from the historic
period
3. an ability to apply spatial concepts and analyse the organisation of space in relation to
society
4. an understanding of the ethics of dealing with cultural and human remains.
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
• Prepare, observe, record, analyse and present sites through the understanding and
use of desk-based assessment, building survey and graphic and photographic records.
○ Conduct a desk-based assessment of a site or landscape using historical
sources
○ Conduct a measured survey of a standing building
○ Record sites using graphical and photographic media
○ Employ safe practices
• The Norman invasion, culture change in the 11th and 12th centuries
• Medieval and Post-Medieval rural and urban landscapes
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 23/05/07
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 1/9/2007
DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: SCHOOL: PARTNER INSTITUTION: NAME OF SITE:
UPC City College Plymouth
MODULE LEADER: Win Scutt Term: All Year
Page 47 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should provide evidence of their:
1. ability to develop new skills in the recording and analysis of historic landscapes
2. knowledge and understanding of buildings and portable artefacts from the historic
period
3. ability to apply spatial concepts and analyse the organisation of space in relation to
society
4. understanding of the ethics of dealing with cultural and human remains
.
Assessment Mode:
Coursework: 100%
1. Report of 1500 words with original survey drawings and photographs 50%
2. one written assignment of 1500 words 30%
3. reflective journal of 1000 words on field courses.20%
Page 48 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP102 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: EXCAVATION
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module will develop an understanding of the range of intrusive investigative methods
that can be used on archaeological sites. These methods include surface artefact collection
and excavation.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
This module involves making contributions to intrusive archaeological field investigations. It
deals with the contributions to preparation for an investigation, the fieldwork and the analysis
and presentation of the data.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected
to be able to:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the underlying concepts and
principles associated with archaeological excavation.
2. evaluate the appropriateness of different excavation strategies to solving specific
archaeological problems.
3. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the techniques used to excavate and
record an archaeological site
4. an ability to evaluate and interpret the data gathered from an excavation..
Page 49 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should provide evidence that they can:
1. Demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the underlying concepts and
principles associated with archaeological excavation.
2. evaluate the appropriateness of different excavation strategies to solving specific
archaeological problems.
3. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the techniques used to excavate
and record an archaeological site.
4. evaluate and interpret the data gathered from an excavation.
Assessment Mode:
Coursework:
1. Report of 1500 words 50%
2. end-module test 30%
3. reflective journal of 1000 words on field courses.20%
Online
ACOA The Association of County Archaeological Officers (1993) Model Briefs and
Specifications for Archaeological Assessments and Field Evaluations. Out of print but
available as a .pdf file (107KB) at http://www.algao.org.uk
DoE (1990) Planning and Policy Guidance Note 16 Available as a .pdf file at
http://www.culture.gov.uk
English Heritage (1991). Management of Archaeological Projects (MAP2)
Page 50 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP103 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL THOUGHT
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
The content of this module includes the history of archaeology to the present, and the
interpretation of archaeology, including issues such as nationalism, gender and racism.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
• to detail the origins and historical development of the discipline of archaeology in
Britain and the World
• to demonstrate how archaeological information can be variously interpreted due to
different historical/political agendas
• to lay the foundations for interpretation in the period-based modules (FDAP100,
FDAP101, FDAP105, FDAP200).
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to
be able to:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the origins and development of
archaeology as a discipline in Britain and the World.
2. begin to understand the intellectual vitality of archaeology, its theoretical basis, current
debates over approaches to interpretation, and archaeology’s relationship to other
disciplines.
3. identify and understand the implications of politically biased versions of the past, in
both history and archaeology, while appreciating and being sensitive to different
cultures.
4. demonstrate an ability to communicate ideas and collaborate with peers.
Page 51 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should provide evidence that they can:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the origins and development of
archaeology as a discipline in Britain and the World.
2. understand the intellectual vitality of archaeology, its theoretical basis, current
debates over approaches to interpretation, and archaeology’s relationship to other
disciplines.
3. identify and understand the implications of politically biased versions of the past, in
both history and archaeology, while appreciating and being sensitive to different
cultures.
4. communicate ideas and collaborate with peers.
Assessment Mode:
Presentation 20%
Article critique 20%
Conference Report and Presentation 60%
Daniel, G. & Renfrew, C. (1988) The Idea of Prehistory. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Gamble, C. (2007) Archaeology: The Basics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge
Greene, K. (2004) Archaeology: an Introduction. 4th ed. London: Routledge
Hays-Gilpin, K. & Whitley, D.S. (1998) Reader in Gender Archaeology. London:
Routledge
Hodder, I. (1995) Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge
Johnson, M. (1999) Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Renfrew, C. (1999) Before Civilisation. London: Pimlico
Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P. (2004) Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice. (4th edition)
London: Thames & Hudson
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. (1992) Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice.
London: Routledge
Trigger, B.G. (2006) A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Internet
Archaeology Data Service http://ads.ahds.ac.uk
Page 52 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP104 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: SITE SURVEYING
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): n/a
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module provides a basic introduction to surveying techniques and the methods used
to set out and control construction works.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked:
Construction/civil engineering
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation n/a
MODULE AIMS:
• To demonstrate the ability to use a range of surveying instruments.
• To demonstrate a detailed understanding of basic site surveying and setting out
procedures.
• To demonstrate an ability to carry out relevant survey calculations.
• To carry out setting out exercises.
• To understand the type of depth of survey required.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to:
1. Demonstrate an ability to select and use appropriate surveying instruments for a
range of tasks.
2. Use a variety of methods to set out and control a range of construction activities
from ground works through to structural frames.
3. Produce a contour plan of an area and analyse the data.
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
• Surveying Principles and Conventions: Commensurate accuracy, co-ordinate systems,
National Grid and OS datum, errors - classifications and detection.
• Surveying Instruments: Linear measurement, Levels (automatic level, laser), Angular
measurement (theodolites, Total Station), Vertical alignment. Method of construction,
adjustment and calibration of instruments. Surveying errors.
• Linear Measurement
• Levelling: Definition of level datums, standard field and booking procedures.
• Traversing: Open and closed traversing; reduction and adjustment of traverse data.
• Detail Survey: Type and reasons for surveying: Trilateration, Triangulation, Total Station,
GPS & GIS.
• Setting out of line and level for building and construction works: Profiles and batter
rails; radial positioning/rectangular co-ordinates; accuracy of setting out and the
specification. Setting out horizontal circular curves, drainage and roads.
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: July 2006
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: September 2006
DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: SCHOOL: PARTNER INSTITUTION: NAME OF SITE:
UPC City College Plymouth
MODULE LEADER: Rick Howell Term: All Year
Page 53 of 72
Assessment Criteria:
1. Demonstrate the skills needed to select and use appropriate surveying
instruments for a range of tasks.
2. Show evidence of having used a variety of methods to set out and control a range
of construction activities from ground works through to structural frames.
3. Show evidence of having produced a contour plan of an area and analysed the
data.
Assessment Mode:
This unit will be assessed by a series of practical exercises carried out in the field carrying
a total weighting of 100%.
Brighty, S (1989) revised by Stirling, D. Setting Out: A Guide for Site Engineers 2nd
Edition. BSP Professional.
Irvine, W. (2005) Surveying for Construction 5th Ed. London: McGraw Hill
Leach, P. 1988 The Surveying of Archaeological Sites [practical manual] Inst Archaeol
Publications
Schofield, W. (2007) Engineering Surveying 6th Ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Page 54 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP105 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: WORLD STONE AGE SOCIETY
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module explores prehistoric society from the Lower Palaeolithic to the origins of
agriculture, including the Oldowan, Acheulean, Middle Palaeolithic Neanderthals and the
origins of modern humans. Similarities and differences in the development of society,
subsistence and technology are evaluated, as are the roles of colonisation, cognition and
adaptation.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
This module involves making contributions to intrusive archaeological field investigations. It
deals with the contributions to preparation for an investigation, the fieldwork and the
analysis and presentation of the data.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be
expected to be able to:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the diversity of human societies
and the complex ways in which social and cultural change occur;
2. demonstrate an ability to present, evaluate and interpret similarities and differences
in development of human societies;
3. demonstrate knowledge of the underlying concepts and principles associated with
the methods used to reconstruct past human behaviour
4. evaluate the ways in which archaeologists' conceptions of what it is to be human
have changed and how these are related to the colonial and post-colonial history of
the West.
Page 55 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should provide evidence that they provide evidence of:
1. a knowledge and understanding of the diversity of human societies and the complex
ways in which social and cultural change occur;
2. an ability to present, evaluate and interpret similarities and differences in
development of human societies;
3. knowledge of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the methods
used to reconstruct past human behaviour
4. an ability to evaluate the ways in which archaeologists' conceptions of what it is to
be human have changed and how these are related to the colonial and post-colonial
history of the West.
Assessment Mode:
Coursework: 70% Essays, Seminars and Presentations.
Assessment: 30% Reflective journal of lectures, seminars and field trips and participation
in groupwork.
Delson, E., I. Tattersall, J. van Couvering, and A. Brooks (eds.) (2000) Encyclopaedia of
Human Evolution and Prehistory. 2nd edition. New York: Garland.
Gamble, C. (1999) The Palaeolithic Societies of Europe. Cambridge: CUP.
Gamble, C. (1993) Timewalkers: The Prehistory of Global Colonization. Stroud: Alan
Sutton.
Johanson, D. & Edgar, B. (1996) From Lucy to Language. New Jersey: Simon & Schuster
Lewin, R. (2005) Human Evolution: an illustrated introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing.
Mellars, P. (1996) The Neanderthal Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mithen, S. (1998) The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion, and
Science. London: Phoenix
Scarre, C. (ed) (2005) The Human Past: World Prehistory and the Development of Human
Societies. London, Thames and Hudson.
Whittaker, John. (1994) Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Texas:
University of Texas Press
Internet
http://www.becominghuman.org/
http://www.svf.uib.no/sfu/blombos/index.htm
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/arcnat/chauvet/en/index.html
Page 56 of 72
MODULE CODE: FDAP106 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module will incorporate Personal Development Planning to enable students to
identify, engage with, and reflect upon the personal and professional skills and
competences required for entry to and progression in archaeological practice. A
Professional Portfolio will be prepared from work in other modules to submit for the
Qualification in Archaeological Practice (QAP Level 3).
Page 57 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student will demonstrate
1. Show evidence of having identified transferable skills and attributes required for
your academic and professional development.
2. Produce an analysis of personal and professional skills and attributes relating to
your chosen career
3. Show you have developed and identified a range of academic and professional
skills and attributes
4. development of the identified academic and professional skills and attributes
required for Level 3 of the Qualification in Archaeological Practice (QAP).
5. Provide evidence of having developed skills by reflecting on future career planning
Assessment Mode:
100% Coursework
Online
http://www.torc.org.uk/factsheet.asphttp://www.torc.org.uk/factsheet.asp
Aitchison, K. & Edwards, R. 2003 Archaeology Labour Market Intelligence: Profiling the
Profession 2002-03. Bradford CHNTO/IFA online:
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/icontent/inPages/docs/prof/LMI_Report1.pdf
Bradford CHNTO/IFA online:
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/icontent/inPages/docs/prof/LMI_Report1.pdf
Page 58 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP107 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 4
MODULE TITLE: WORK BASED LEARNING
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
The aim of this module is to develop students’ practical insight into the world of work as an
archaeologist. It will enable them to critically examine the working environment and
practice as an archaeologist including the identification of key attributes and skills for
archaeological professions and provide the opportunity to gain experience and
demonstrate those skills.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Page 59 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should be able to:
1. Produce evidence that shows application and reflection on the aims, attitudes, practices
and procedures required as an archaeologist.
2. Describe the key attributes and skills required to operate as an archaeologist.
3. Show evidence that demonstrates a basic level of competence related to identified
attributes and skills in the Qualification in Archaeological Practice (Intrusive
Investigation)
4. Reflect on your practice in the context of your chosen career
Assessment Mode:
Coursework: 100%
Barker, P.A. (1993) Techniques of Archaeological Excavation 3rd ed. London: Routledge.)
Collis, J. (2002) Digging up the Past Stroud: Sutton
Dorrell, P.G. (1994) Photography in Archaeology and Conservation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Drewett, P.L. (1999) Field Archaeology: an introduction. London: Routledge
Institute of Field Archaeologists (2001) Standard and guidance for archaeological
excavation, revised edition September 2001
Institute of Field Archaeologists (2001) Standard and guidance for archaeological
watching brief, revised edition September 2001
Joukowsky, M. (1980) A Complete Manual of Field Archaeology. New Jersey: Prentice
Hall.
Roskams, S. (2001) Excavation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
SCAUM (1997) Health and Safety in Field Archaeology Standing Conference of
Archaeological Unit Managers
Schon D (1995) The Reflective Practitioner. Chichester: Jossey Bass
Spence, C. (ed.) 1994. Archaeological Site Manual .3rd ed. Museum of London
Archaeology Service (MoLAS)
Online
ACOA The Association of County Archaeological Officers (1993) Model Briefs and
Specifications for Archaeological Assessments and Field Evaluations. Out of print but
available as a .pdf file (107KB) at http://www.algao.org.uk
DoE (1990) Planning and Policy Guidance Note 16 Available as a .pdf file at
http://www.culture.gov.uk
English Heritage (1991) Management of Archaeological Projects (MAP2)
Page 60 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP200 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: FIELDWORK: ROMAN AND EARLY MEDIEVAL
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module uses Roman and Early Medieval Archaeology as a context within which to further
develop a range of non-intrusive investigative skills and theoretical understanding.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
The course will further provide students with:
• A range of non-intrusive skills used in archaeological investigations
• an outline understanding and theoretical appreciation of the sites, landscapes,
buildings, artefacts and issues of Britain from the Roman and Early Medieval periods,
in context with the relevant world archaeology.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of a module the learner will be expected to:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and critical understanding of Roman and Early Medieval
archaeology
2. demonstrate competence in applying a range of established techniques and skills to
initiate and undertake critical analyses of archaeological investigations.
3. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the main methods of inquiry relating to
sites and landscapes of the Roman and Early Medieval periods.
4. Use a range of established geophysical techniques, initiate and undertake a critical
analysis of information and prepare strategies for further investigation.
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
• prepare; observe; record; analyse; present sites through the understanding and use of
desk-based assessment, building survey and graphic and photographic records.
• Use GIS, Geophysical and Geochemical survey in conjunction with usual site survey
methods (Module FDAP104) to record a site
• Historical accounts, inscriptions, coins, sculptures and the results of archaeological
investigations in the Roman and early medieval periods.
• “Anglo Saxons”, “Vikings” and evidence for culture change in the early medieval period
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 23/05/07
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 1/9/2007
DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: SCHOOL: PARTNER INSTITUTION: NAME OF SITE:
UPC City College Plymouth
MODULE LEADER: Derek Gore Term: All Year
Page 61 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) : The student should be able to:
1. demonstrate a knowledge and critical understanding of Roman and Early Medieval
archaeology
2. demonstrate competence in applying a range of established techniques and skills
to initiate and undertake critical analyses of archaeological investigations.
3. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the main methods of inquiry relating
to sites and landscapes of the Roman and Early Medieval periods.
4. Use a range of established geophysical techniques, initiate and undertake a critical
analysis of information and prepare strategies for further investigation
Assessment Mode:
1. Practical Assessment of geophysical survey in the field 25%
2. Report of 2000 words with original survey drawings and photographs 25%
3. reflective journal of 500 words on field course 10%
4. reflective journal of 500 words on field course 10%
5. Group Presentation and report 30%
Schedule of Teaching and Learning:
The module is delivered by means of lectures, field trips and online tutorials through the
College VLE.
Recommended Texts and Sources
Clark, A. (1996) Seeing beneath the Soil London: Routledge
Cunliffe, B. (1993) Wessex to AD1000. London: Longman.
Dark, P. (2000) The Environment of Britain in the First Millennium A.D. London:
Duckworth
David, A. (1995) Geophysical survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation, English Heritage
DoE / DNH (1994) Planning Policy Guidance note 15 (PPG15) 'Planning & the Historic
Environment'.
Dorrell, P.G. (1994) Photography in Archaeology and Conservation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Frere, S.S. (1991) Britannia: A History of Roman Britain. 3rd ed. London: Pimlico
Hinton, D. (1990) Archaeology, economy and society. London: Routledge
Institute of Field Archaeologists (1999) Standards and Guidance for Archaeological Field
Evaluation
Institute of Field Archaeologists (2001) FA Standard and Guidance for Archaeological
Desk-Based Assessment, revised edition September 2001
Ireland, S. (1996) Roman Britain, a sourcebook. London: Routledge
Keppie, L. (2001) Understanding Roman Inscriptions. London: Batsford
Millett, M. (2005() Roman Britain London: English Heritage/Batsford
Salway, P. (2001) A History of Roman Britain. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks
SCAUM (1997) Health and Safety in Field Archaeology
Schollar, I., Tabbagh, A., Hesse, A., and Herzog, I. (1990) Archaeological Prospecting
and Remote Sensing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shotter, D.C.A. (2004) Roman Britain. 2nd ed. London: Routledge
Spence, C. (ed.) (1994) Archaeological Site Manual (3rd edn.) Museum of London
Archaeology Service (MoLAS)
Internet
Archaeology Data Service http://ads.ahds.ac.uk including GIS Guide to Good Practice at
http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/project/goodguides/gis/index.html
Abingdon Archaeological Geophysics. Archaeological Geophysics: A Short Guide
http://www.bajr.org/Documents/GeoPhysics.pdf
Page 62 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP201 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module will include scientific approaches and techniques for dating and materials
analysis, with assessment of scientific reports, field assessment and some theoretical
considerations.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
• to further develop knowledge of the importance of science to the discipline
• to provide an opportunity for students to receive a sound understanding of the
scientific applications encountered in modern archaeology
• to provide a sufficient insight into these topics to enable students to communicate
with scientific specialists
• to enable students to interpret critically the findings of scientific specialists through
the medium of their own reports
• to build on the scientific concepts and skills introduced in the previous modules
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to:
1. further advance their understanding of scientific methods used in collecting,
analysing, and interpreting archaeological data
2. critically appraise their own and other people’s arguments
3. select and apply appropriate scientific principles and concepts to archaeological
problems from specialist scientific investigations
4. understand the causes of variation in the reliability of different classes of evidence
from archaeological contexts (such as: taphonomy; cultural and non-cultural
transformations; depositional processes; and recovery procedures)
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
The science behind archaeology and quaternary studies will be drawn together from
previous work on the programme and further developed. This will include: Dating,
especially Radio-Carbon, Dendrochronology & Thermoluminescence; Materials Analysis;
Conservation Applications; Environmental Archaeology, especially soil science, botanical
& faunal evidence; Climatic Modelling & Interpretation; Ethics, Health & Safety.
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 23/05/07
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 1/9/2007
DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: SCHOOL: PARTNER INSTITUTION: (For FHSW) NAME OF
UPC City College Plymouth SITE:
MODULE LEADER: Win Scutt Term: All Year
Page 63 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should be able to provide evidence of:
1. greater understanding of scientific methods used in collecting, analysing, and
interpreting archaeological data
2. an ability to critically appraise their own and other people’s arguments
3. an ability to select and apply appropriate scientific principles and concepts to
archaeological problems from specialist scientific investigations
4. an understanding of the causes of variation in the reliability of different classes of
evidence from archaeological contexts (such as: taphonomy; cultural and non-
cultural transformations; depositional processes; and recovery procedures)
Assessment Mode:
Seminars (25% + 25%)
1) The seminars will test the students’ basic understanding of scientific methods used in
the collection, analysis and interpretation of archaeological data
2) The seminar will require students to marshal and critically appraise their own and other
people’s arguments.
In-class test (50%)
1) The in-class test will require students to critically appraise the arguments presented by
others
2) Questions posed will require students to draw down scientific principles and concepts to
critically evaluate specialist scientific investigations
3) The questions will involve an understanding of the causes of variation in the reliability
of different classes of evidence from archaeological contexts
Schedule of Teaching and Learning:
This module will be taught through a series of lectures and seminar discussions, in which
students will work on their chosen topics for the assessed presentation.
Recommended Texts and Sources
The recommended texts for the course are:
Baillie, M.G.L. (1995) A Slice Through Time. London: Routledge
Brothwell D. & Pollard, A.M. (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Archaeological Sciences. London:
Wiley
Cronyn, J.M. (1990) The Elements of Archaeological Conservation. London: Routledge
Davis, S.J.M. (1987) The Archaeology of Animals. London: Routledge
Evans, J.G. & O'Connor, T. (1999) Environmental Archaeology: principles and methods.
Stroud: Sutton
Hausenbuiller, R.L. (1985) Soil Science. Third Edition. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown
Moore, P. D et al, M.E. (1991) Pollen Analysis. 2nd ed Oxford: Blackwell,
Orton, C. (2000) Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pollard A.M. & Heron, C. (1996) Archaeological Chemistry. London: Royal Society of
Chemistry
Renfrew, A.C. & Bahn, P. (2008) Archaeology: theories, methods and practice. 5th ed.
London: Thames & Hudson
Retallack, G.J. (2001) Soils of the Past: An Introduction to Paleopedology. Oxford:
Blackwell
Stirland, A. (1999) Human Bones in Archaeology. Princes Risborough: Shire
Internet
Archaeology Data Service http://ads.ahds.ac.uk
Page 64 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP202 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module explores the potential of Experimental Archaeology as a powerful research
method, an educational tool and as a medium for public outreach.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 80% (A1)ASSESSMENT 20%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
The module aims to provide the student with an understanding of the theory and practice
of Experimental Archaeology, the skills to conduct experiments in a safe and scientific
manner, and an appreciation of how the subject can be applied in an educational context.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be
expected to:
1. demonstrate knowledge, critical understanding and theoretical grounding in the
scientific use of experiments within archaeological research.
2. evaluate the utility and characteristics of a range of materials including ceramics,
stone, metals and organic materials.
3. effectively communicate the role of experiments and “reconstructions” in a variety of
forms, to specialist and non-specialist audiences, including education and public
outreach.
4. conduct experiments in the technologies and processes of the past, from the
acquisition of raw materials to manufacture, use and discard; and to post-
depositional processes.
Page 65 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should be able to provide evidence of:
1. knowledge, critical understanding and theoretical grounding in the scientific use of
experiments within archaeological research.
2. An ability to evaluate the utility and characteristics of a range of materials including
ceramics, stone, metals and organic materials.
3. Effectively communicating the role of experiments and “reconstructions” in a variety
of forms, to specialist and non-specialist audiences, including education and public
outreach.
4. Experiments they have conducted in the technologies and processes of the past,
from the acquisition of raw materials to manufacture, use and discard; and to post-
depositional processes.
Assessment Mode:
1. Coursework Report (80%)
The student will present a report of an experiment they have conducted: the
hypothesis, the theoretical background, an outline methodology, an account of the
learning process, presentation and analysis of data; interpretation and conclusions.
The student must use scientific principles to critically appraise their own and other
people’s arguments. The student may choose how to present the report: for example
on a website, as a video recording, a written report or a combination of these.
2. Conducting an experiment 20%
The student must conduct an experiment witnessed by a member of staff or
recorded in video or stills.
Schedule of Teaching and Learning:
This module will be taught through a series of lectures and workshop seminars, in which
students will discuss their chosen project for the assessed coursework report.
Recommended Texts and Sources
The recommended texts for the course are:
Books
Coles, J. (1973) Archaeology by Experiment London: Hutchinson
Hodges, H. (1989) Artefacts: An Introduction to Early Materials and Technology. London:
Duckworth
Reynolds, P. (2003) Experiment in Archaeology. Stroud: NPI
Journals
EUROREA (European Reconstruction and Experiment in Archaeology)
Internet
XARC: European network of Open Air Museums and other facilities involved in
Experimental Archaeology: http://www.exarc.net/
The Delphi Project http://www.delphi.exarc.net/delphi
Archives of ARCH-EXPERIMENT jiscmail http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/arch-
experiment.html
Experiment, Reconstruction and Education in Archaeology: http://www.exrea.net
Historical Metallurgy Society: http://hist-met.org/
Archaeology Data Service http://ads.ahds.ac.uk
Page 66 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP203 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: SITE MANAGEMENT
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): n/a
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module gives the learner a working knowledge of the processes involved in setting up
and operating an archaeological site as part of a major construction project, particularly
with regard to Health & Safety legislation and the normal management procedures within
the construction industry. These processes are also relevant for stand alone
archaeological investigations.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked.
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
• To develop an understanding of the processes involved in establishing and
managing a safe working environment.
• Enable the learner to discharge their duties under the relevant Environmental and
Health & Safety legislation.
• Allow learners to develop on understanding of some of the processes involved in
working as one of a team on a major construction project.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be
expected to be able to:
1. Consider the rationale and strategy for establishing a site
2. Set up a site for an archaeological investigation demonstrating the
transferable skills necessary to exercise personal responsibility and decision
making.
3. Use a range of established techniques to undertake risk assessments and
method statements in accordance with requirements of Health & Safety
legislation.
4. Analyse the processes necessary for the proper management of an
archaeological site within a commercial environment.
5. Critically evaluate the planning and execution of the management of a site.
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
• Site Establishment: environmental risk assessment, site access and hard standings,
fencing and security; welfare facilities, location and protection of permanent services,
provision of temporary services, plant and equipment
• Health and Safety: Legislation, general duties, policies and procedures. Construction
(Design and Management) Regulations 2007.
• Site organisation, relationships and the management team: Statutory authorities,
the client, the architect, the engineers, the quantity surveyor, the contractor and the
sub-contractors.
• Contractual procedures: methods of procurement, conditions of contract, contact
procedures.
• Financial control: Estimates and valuations, planning and cost control, procurement of
labour, plant and materials.
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 23/5/07
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 1/9/07 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: UPC SCHL. PARTNER INSTITUTION City College Plymouth SITE:
Page 67 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should be able to provide evidence of:
1. the rationale and strategy for establishing a site
2. The preparations for an archaeological investigation demonstrating the transferable
skills necessary to exercise personal responsibility and decision making.
3. Using a range of established techniques to initiate and undertake risk assessments
and method statements in accordance with requirements of Health & Safety
legislation.
4. Analysing the processes necessary for the proper management of an archaeological
site within a commercial environment.
5. Critically evaluating the planning and execution of the management of a site.
Assessment Mode:
Produce a portfolio of evidence relating to the establishment and organisation of an
archaeological site consisting of the following:
• A site plan showing site access and all necessary measures to ensure the health,
safety and welfare of the public and those working within the site. (40%)
• Environmental audit and heath & safety risk assessments for the activities together
with appropriate method statements. (20)
• A programme showing the duration of each activity (20%)
• Budget costs relating to the provision of all labour, plant and materials. (20%)
Construction Industry Training Board (2007) Construction site safety: volumes 1 & 2 GE
700, Norfolk: CITB
Forster, G. (1989) Construction site studies: production, administration and personnel,
Harlow: Longman
Hackett, Mark et al (2006) The Aqua group guide to procurement, tendering and contract
administration, Oxford: Blackwell
Harris, Frank and McCaffer, Ronald (2006) Modern construction management, Oxford:
Blackwell
St. John Holt, Allan (2005) Principles of Health and Safety at Work, Wigston: IOSH
The Aqua Group (2002) Pre-contract practice and contract administration for the building
team, Oxford: Blackwell Science
The Aqua Group (1999) Tenders and contracts for building, Oxford: Blackwell Science
Spence, C. (ed.) (1994) Archaeological Site Manual (3rd edition) Museum of London
Archaeology Service (MoLAS)
Online
http://www.hse.gov.uk
Page 68 of 72
MODULE CODE: FDAP204 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: ARCHAEOLOGY AND SOCIETY
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): n/a
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module explores the role of archaeology in contemporary society and the modern world.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked
Minimum pass mark for professional body accreditation
MODULE AIMS:
The module aims to contextualise Archaeological Practice within a social framework:
• the value of archaeology to society
• the ethics of dealing with human and cultural remains of other societies
• the statutory and policy requirements set by government to document, preserve and
interpret material remains
• the responsibility and means to communicate the past to society.
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to
be able to:
1. effectively communicate information, analysis and arguments to support the relevance of
archaeological investigation in contemporary society, in a variety of forms, to specialist
and non-specialist audiences, and deploy key techniques of the discipline effectively
2. critically evaluate the ethical and legal issues behind the excavation and storage of
human and cultural remains
3. select and evaluate appropriate methods for communicating the results of archaeological
investigations to different audience
4. critically evaluate the roles and functions of key organisations involved in the
archaeology of the UK.
INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT:
What is the relevance and importance of archaeology in contemporary society? Archaeology
and World Politics; Advocacy in Archaeology; Communicating archaeology; Statutory protection
of sites and portable antiquities in the UK; Restitution of cultural property; The treatment of
human remains. Heritage Legislation; Planning Policy Guidance 16; Portable Antiquities
Scheme; Treasure Act; Restitution of Cultural Property; Ethical Issues. the notion of ethics and
responsibility; the use of the past for establishing group identity with particular reference to
nationalism; the concept of heritage; archaeology in the media; and the role of archaeology in
situations of conflict. Public Agencies: DCMS; National & Local Authority Museums; Planning
Authorities; English Heritage, Cadw, Environment and Heritage Service (Northern Ireland) and
Historic Scotland; Academic organisations (Universities, Colleges and Schools). Voluntary
Sector Agencies: The Council for British Archaeology, Council for Scottish Archaeology; CBA
Wales. Contract Archaeology.
APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 23/05/07
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 1/9/07 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: n/a
FACULTY: UPC SCHOOL: PARTNER INSTITUTION: NAME OF SITE:
City College Plymouth
MODULE LEADER: Win Scutt Term* 1 & 2
Page 69 of 72
Assessment Criteria (Threshold Level) :
The student should be able to provide evidence of:
1. effectively communicate information, analysis and arguments to support the relevance of
archaeological investigation in contemporary society, in a variety of forms, to specialist
and non-specialist audiences, and deploy key techniques of the discipline effectively
2. critically evaluating the ethical and legal issues behind the excavation and storage of
human and cultural remains
3. selecting and evaluating appropriate methods for communicating the results of
archaeological investigations to different audiences
4. critically evaluating the roles and functions of key organisations involved in the
archaeology of the UK.
Assessment Mode:
Essay 40%
Presentation 40%
End module test: 20%
Hodder, I., (2003) Reading the Past, Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology
Cambridge University Press
Page 70 of 72
UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD
MODULE CODE: FDAP205 CREDITS: 20 LEVEL: 5
MODULE TITLE: RESEARCH SKILLS
PRE-REQUISITE(S): None
CO-REQUISITE(S): None
COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: Yes
SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR
This module enables students to identify a range of different research methods, processes and
considerations which are central in conducting a research project in their academic or
professional discipline.
ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK 100%
ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of the module the learner will be expected to
be able to:
1. Produce an appropriate research project proposal for an archaeological investigation.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the factors which are prevalent when proposing
and planning a research project in archaeology.
3. Evaluate a range of research methodologies and data collection techniques.
4. Present and critically evaluate a range of data.
APPROVAL
DATE OF APPROVAL: April 2006
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: Sept 2006
DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: 23/05/07
Page 71 of 72
collection techniques.
4. Show evidence of having critically evaluated data.
Assessment Mode:
Coursework: 100%
The module will be delivered via a combination of lectures, seminars and individual tutorial and
guest speakers where appropriate. A comprehensive package of support and learning
resources will be available to students via the VLE.
Dawson, C (2005) Practical Research Methods. 2nd, ed. Oxford: How to books
English Heritage (1992) The Management of Archaeological Projects. London: English
Heritage
Binford, L R (1964) “A consideration of archaeological research design”, American Antiquity
29: 425-41.
Binford, L R (2001) “Where do research problems come from?” American Antiquity 66(4), 669-
78.
Mueller, J W (1975) Sampling in Archaeology. Tucson. Barker, C O and Graeme Slater, E
(2000) Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressOdell, G H (2001)
“Research problems R Us”, American Antiquity 66(4), 679-85.
Peregrine, P N (2001) Archaeological Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Redman, C W (1987) “Surface collection, sampling and research design: a retrospective”,
American Antiquity 52: 249-65.
Walliman, N (2005) Your research project. 2nd edition, London: Sage
Online
The Subject Centre for History, Classics and Archaeology.
http://www.hca.heacademy.ac.uk/archaeology/
Page 72 of 72