1

2
3 Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
4 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7036
5 California State Bar No.: 223433
6 E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
Captain Pamela Barnett, et al., §
9 Plaintiffs, §
§
10 v. § Civil Action:
§
11 Barack Hussein Obama, § SACV09-00082-DOC-AN
Michelle L.R. Obama, §
12 Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, § 18 U.S.C. §1346: Intangible
13 Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, § Rights Fraud-Request for Judicial
Joseph R. Biden, Vice-President and § Notice that Individual Damages
14 President of the Senate, § Not Required in Public Sector
Defendants. § Mail & Wire Political Corruption
15
18 U.S.C. §1346: Intangible Rights Fraud---
16 Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages
17 Are not Required in Public Sector Mail & Wire Political Corruption

18 Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual
19 Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political
20 corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by
21 Susan Daniels.
22 During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly
23 examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold
24 question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer
25 standing or else 9th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of
26 Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated
27 qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board
28 of Education and USA v Clark . l

Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --1– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
1
2
3 Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year,
4 accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s
5 fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this
6 end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative
7 Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the
8 expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.
9 These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show
10 beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s
11 identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social
12 security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a
13 substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42
14 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008
15 election. Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to
16 know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so
17 casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the
18 truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud
19 by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree
20 and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud
21 leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.
22 The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured
23 by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a
24 scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and
25 identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by
26 private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate
27 wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil
28 R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).

Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --2– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
1
2
3 Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’
4 express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both
5 (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and
6 Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January
7 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18
8 U.S.C. §1346. It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and
9 private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of
10 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages
11 or “standing” in the civil sense. Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of
12 prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate
13 the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case
14 Barnett v. Obama.
15 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial
16 Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18
17 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring
18 suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for
19 RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific
20 personalized injury to business or property interests. Accordingly, the people of the
21 United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible
22 right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case
23 should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint
24 allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of
25 citizen standing.
26 Respectfully submitted,
Sunday, October 11, 2009
27 /s/ ORLY TAITZ, ESQ.
28 By:__________________________________
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)
Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --3– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
1
2
3 Attorney for the Plaintiffs
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
4 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7036
5 E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --4– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
1
2
3 PROOF OF SERVICE
4 I the undersigned Charles Edward Lincoln, being over the age of 18 and not a
5 party to this case, so hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on this, Sunday,
6 October 11, 2009, I provided electronic copies of the Plaintiffs’ above-and-foregoing
7 Request for Judicial Notice of Scheme to Defraud by Denial of the Intangible Right
8 to Honest Services under 18 U.S.C. §1346 was served on all of the following non-
9 party attorneys whose names were affixed to the “STATEMENT OF INTEREST”
10 who have appeared in this case in accordance with the local rules of the Central
11 District of California, to wit:
12 THOMAS P. O’BRIEN
13 LEON W. WEIDMAN
14 ROGER E. WEST roger.west4@usdoj.gov (designated as lead counsel for President
15 Barack Hussein Obama on August 7, 2009)
16 DAVID A. DeJUTE David.Dejute@usdoj.gov
17 GARY KREEP usjf@usjf.net
18 FACSIMILE (213) 894-7819
19 DONE AND EXECUTED ON THIS Sunday the 11th day of October, 2009.
20
21 /s/Charles Edward Lincoln, III
22 Charles Edward Lincoln, III
23 Tierra Limpia/Deo Vindice
c/o Peyton Yates Freiman
24 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6
Austin, Texas 78705
25
26 charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com
Tel: (512) 923-1889
27
28

Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --5– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Exhibit A:
10 Susan Daniels
Expanded Report
11
12
13 Submitted in Support of Plaintiffs Request for
14 Judicial Notice relating to
15
“Probable Cause” to allege a
16
Private Sector Scheme to defraud and pattern of
racketeering underlay
17
The election of
18
Barack Hussein Obama to
19 Highest Office in the Public Sector;
20 I.E.: The Presidency in 2008
21 Was Taken by Fraud and
22 Assumed by an Unqualified Person.
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice of 18 U.S.C. § 1346 --6– Dr. ORLY TAITZ, Attorney-at-Law
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Public Sector Fraud as Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services: Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
Expanded Report from Susan Daniels (949) 683-5411; e-mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com