by Eddie Tarnow
NLA Test & Measurement Workshop 20 September 2011
NMISA 2011
Force Applied
Calibration Scenario
The Unit Under Test Torque Wrench is a Type II class A tool (adjustable click type) and has a full scale of 350 Nm. It has a setting dial resolution of 2 Nm We are to calibrate it according to ISO 6789 which requires a calibration point at full scale (100 % of range) viz. at 350 Nm and the estimation of the measurement uncertainty at this point
NMISA 2011
GUM Steps
Model the measurement Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty Categorize as type A or type B Manipulate appropriately to obtain Standard uncertainties, u(xi) Sensitivity coefficients, ci Uncertainty contributor, u(yi) Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y) Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence Report the result
NMISA 2011
Measurement Model
NMISA 2011
TSTD
TUUT
URes
URep
TUUT
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
y=a+bx+cx +dx
0,045 Nm
0,045 Nm
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
60 % Meas 1
60 % Meas 2
60 % Meas 3
60 % Meas 4
60 % Meas 5
60 % Mean
100 % Meas 1
100 % Meas 2
100 % Meas 3
100 % Meas 4
100 % Meas 5
100 % Mean
NMISA 2011
60 % Meas 1
60 % Meas 2
60 % Meas 3
60 % Meas 4
60 % Meas 5
60 % Mean
100 % Meas 1
100 % Meas 2
100 % Meas 3
100 % Meas 4
100 % Meas 5
100 % Mean
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
GUM Steps
Model the measurement Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty Categorize as type A or type B Manipulate appropriately to obtain Standard uncertainties, u(xi) Sensitivity coefficients, ci Uncertainty contributor, u(yi) Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y) Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence Report the result
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
GUM Steps
Model the measurement Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty Categorize as type A or type B Manipulate appropriately to obtain Standard uncertainties, u(xi) Sensitivity coefficients, ci Uncertainty contributor, u(yi) Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y) Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence Report the result
NMISA 2011
Uncertainty Budget
NMISA 2011
GUM Steps
Model the measurement Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty Categorize as type A or type B Manipulate appropriately to obtain Standard uncertainties, u(xi) Sensitivity coefficients, ci Uncertainty contributor, u(yi) Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y) Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence Report the result
NMISA 2011
NMISA 2011
Conclusions
Both methods in this case prove that the UUT is well within the allowable 4% of Maximum ( 14 Nm) Using the ESDM (In accordance with ISO 6789) results in the smallest uncertainty (unrealistic??) Using the ESD (contrary to ISO 6789) results in the largest uncertainty (realistic??) Always use the polynomial for calibrations using the laboratory Reference Standard Torque Transducer This will correct for any error on the Reference Standard eliminating the need to apply corrections This will solve the problem of the Applied Torque not being exactly at the nominal values
NMISA 2011