various carriers like polyethylene glycol 6000, polyvinylpyrrolidone K 30 and Gelucire 50/13 in different ratios. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Candesartan cilexetil was supplied by Dr. Reddys laboratory and polyethylene glycol 6000 from Viswaat chemicals, polyvinylpyrrolidone K 30 from BASF India and Gelucire 50/13 from Gate fosse. All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. Methods Solubility studies It was carried out to determine solubility of Candesartan cilexetil in presence of various carriers like polyethylene glycol 6000, poloxamer 188, polyvinylpyrrolidone K 30, Gelucire 50/13, hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose etc. This was done by dissolving excess amount of drug in flasks containing different concentrations of carriers in different ratios (1:0.25, 1:1, 1:5) in distilled water. The flasks were shaken thoroughly at 200rpm and kept aside for 48hours. The suspensions were filtered and absorbance was measured at 254nm after dilution. From these studies carriers like polyethylene glycol 6000, polyvinylpyrrolidone K 30, Gelucire 50/13 was chosen as they showed better solubility. These drug-to-carrier ratios were used for preparation of solid dispersions (Table 1).
*Corresponding author.
Dr. N.Damodharan, M.Pharm., Ph.D. Professor and Head, Department of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, Kattankulathur-603203, India.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Poloxamer 188 Polyvinylpyrollidone K30 Gelucire 50/13 Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Polyethylene Glycol 6000 Hydroxy Propyl Cellulose Mannitol
Drug:polymer ratios 01:00.3 1:01 1:05 0.0003 0.0011 0.0078 0.0011 0.0006 0.001 0.0003 0.0003 0.0007 0.0007 0.03 0.0002 0.0009 0.0005 0.0004 0.0003 0.0008 0.0005 0.0292 0.0001 0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 0.0001
333-337
Figure 1: X-ray powder diffraction studies of Candesartan cilexetil and carriers Journal of Pharmacy Research Vol.5 Issue 1.January 2012 333-337
1 2 3
333-337
1 2 3 4
Drug: polymer ratios Drug (mg) Polymer (mg) Sodium lauryl sulphate (mg)
Prepared capsules were evaluated for weight variation, disintegration, drug content uniformity and in-vitro dissolution studies. Drug content uniformity Amount of solid dispersion equivalent to 8 mg of the drug was dissolved in mobile phase (Mixture of buffer (0.02M mono basic potassium, acetonitrile, triethylamine in the ratio of 40:60:0.2, pH adjusted to 6.0 using phosphoric acid) and analyzed for drug content using HPLC at 254nm. In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out in USP type II paddle apparatus using 500 ml demineralized water maintained at 370.5oc. 10ml aliquots of samples were withdrawn at different time intervals and replaced using drug free dissolution media. The samples were analyzed using HPLC and the percentage of drug dissolved at different time intervals was plotted against time. The drug release profiles of formulated capsules were compared with the pure drug and with the marketed product [11]. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Solid dispersions showing better solubility were formulated into capsule dosage form and evaluated for its parameters. All the parameters were within the specified limits. Weight variation was within the I.P limits (10%). The time taken for the capsules to disintegrate was evaluated in all the formulations and found to be in the range of 8-9minutes which was within I.P limits (within 15 minutes for uncoated tablet). The drug content analysis of Candesartan cilexetil in all the formulations was found to be 98.9% w/w (Table 4). It indicates that the drug is uniformly dispersed and the methods used in the study appear to be reproducible for preparation of solid dispersions.
In-vitro dissolution studies are performed for all the three formulations (Table 5). Table 5: Dissolution studies
S.NO Time in min Percentage drug released F-1 F-2 F-3 80.2 82.1 85.6 86.5 84.9 43.2 46.9 49.1 51.7 53.2 13.4 14.5 14.9 15.4 16.5 API 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 marketed 16.6 17.1 18.5 19.9 21.2
1 2 3 4 5
15 30 45 60 Recovery
Figure-6: Comparative Dissolution Profile of Marketed Product and Formulation-I Journal of Pharmacy Research Vol.5 Issue 1.January 2012 333-337
6.
7.
8. 9.
2.
10.
3. 4.
11. 12.
13.
333-337