Tobacco Use: United States, 1900-1999

From Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

November 30, 1999

Smokingonce a socially accepted behavioris the leading preventable cause of death and disability in the United States. During the first decades of the 20th century, lung cancer was rare however, as cigarette smoking became increasingly popular, first among men and later among women, the incidence of lung cancer became epidemic !"igure #$.
FIGURE 1

Annual Adult per Capita Cigarette Consumption and "tates, 1990'199(

a!or "mo#ing and $ealt% Events&United

%n #&'0, the lung cancer death rate for men was (.& per #00,000 in #&&0, the rate had increased to )*.+ per #00,000. ,ther diseases and conditions now known to be caused by tobacco use include heart disease, atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease, laryngeal cancer, oral cancer, esophageal cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intrauterine growth retardation, and low birthweight. During the latter part of the 20th century, the adverse health effects from e-posure to environmental tobacco smoke also were documented. .hese include lung cancer, asthma, respiratory infections, and decreased pulmonary function.

Smoking and Lung Cancer Link

/arge epidemiologic studies conducted by 0rnst 1ynder and others in the #&(0s and #&*0s linked cigarette smoking and lung cancer. %n #&+(, on the basis of appro-imately ),000 articles relating to smoking and disease, the 2dvisory 3ommittee to the US Surgeon 4eneral concluded that cigarette smoking is a cause of lung and laryngeal cancer in men, a probable cause of lung cancer in women, and the most important cause of chronic bronchitis in both se-es. .he committee stated that 5cigarette smoking is a health ha6ard of sufficient importance in the United States to warrant appropriate remedial action.7

Substantial public health efforts to reduce the prevalence of tobacco use began shortly after the risk was described in #&+(. 1ith the subse8uent decline in smoking, the incidence of smoking9 related cancers !including cancers of the lung, oral cavity, and pharyn-$ have also declined !with the e-ception of lung cancer among women$. %n addition, age9ad:usted death rates per #00,000 persons !standardi6ed to the #&(0 population$ for heart disease !ie, coronary heart disease$ have decreased from '0).( in #&*0 to #'(.+ in #&&+. During #&+( to #&&2, appro-imately #.+ million deaths caused by smoking were prevented.
Smoking Trends During the 20th Century

0arly in the 20th century, several events coincided that contributed to increases in annual per capita consumption, including the introduction of blends and curing processes that allowed the inhalation of tobacco, the invention of the safety match, improvements in mass production, transportation that permitted widespread distribution of cigarettes, and use of mass media advertising to promote cigarettes. 3igarette smoking among women began to increase in the #&20s when targeted industry marketing and social changes reflecting the liberali6ation of women;s roles and behavior led to the increasing acceptability of smoking among women. 2nnual per capita cigarette consumption increased from *( cigarettes in #&00 to (,'(* cigarettes in #&+' and then decreased to 2,2+# in #&&<. Some decreases correlate with events, such as the first research suggesting a link between smoking and cancer in the #&*0s, the #&+( Surgeon 4eneral;s report, the #&+< "airness Doctrine, and increased tobacco ta-ation and industry price increases during the #&<0s !"igure #$.
FIGURE )

*rends in Cigarette "mo#ing Among +ersons , 1( -ears .ld, b/ Gender&United "tates, 1900'1991

2n important accomplishment of the second half of the 20th century has been the reduction of smoking prevalence among persons aged #< years from (2.(= in #&+* to 2(.)= in #&&), with the rate for men !2).+=$ higher than for women !22.#=$ !"igure 2$. .he percentage of adults who never smoked increased from ((= in the mid9#&+0s to **= in #&&). %n #&&<, tobacco use varied within and among racial>ethnic groups. .he prevalence of smoking was highest among 2merican %ndians>2laska ?atives, and second highest among black and Southeast 2sian men. .he prevalence was lowest among 2sian 2merican and @ispanic women. ASmokeless tobacco use has changed little since #&)0, with a *= prevalence in #&)0 and a += prevalence in #&&# among men, and 2= and #=, respectively, among women. .he prevalence of smokeless tobacco use is highest among high school males, with prevalence being 20= among white males, += among @ispanics males, and (= among black males. Brevalence of use tends to be lower in the northeastern region and higher in the southern region of the United States.

.otal consumption of cigars decreased from < million in #&)0 to 2 million in #&&' but increased +<= to '.+ million in #&&). Ceductions in smoking result from many factors, including scientific evidence of the relation among disease, tobacco use, and environmental e-posure to tobacco dissemination of this information to the public surveillance and evaluation of prevention and cessation programs campaigns by advocates for nonsmokers; rights restrictions on cigarette advertising counteradvertising policy changes !ie, enforcement of minors; access laws, legislation restricting smoking in public places, and increased ta-ation$ improvements in treatment and prevention programs and an increased understanding of the economic costs of tobacco.
Changes in Cigarette Design

.he cigarette itself has changed. 1hen cigarettes were first associated with lung cancer in the early #&*0s, most US smokers smoked unfiltered cigarettes. 1ith a growing awareness of the danger of smoking came the first filter, which was designed to reduce the tar inhaled in the smoke. /ater, low9tar cigarettes were marketed however, many smokers compensated by smoking more intensely and by blocking the filter;s ventilation holes. 2denocarcinoma has replaced s8uamous cell carcinoma as the leading cause of lung cancer9 related death in the United States. .his increase in adenocarcinoma parallels the changes in cigarette design and smoking behavior. 3hanges in the social norms surrounding smoking can be documented by e-amining changes in public policy, including availability of "airness Doctrine counteradvertising messages on television and radio and increased restrictions on tobacco advertising, beginning with the ban on broadcast advertising in #&)#. 3igarette advertising no longer appears on television or billboards, and efforts to restrict sales and marketing to adolescents have increased. %ndoor air policies switched from favoring smokers to favoring nonsmokers. Smoking is no longer permitted on airplanes, and many people, including #2.*= of adult smokers with children, do not smoke at home. ?ow (2 states have restrictions on smoking at government work sites and 20 states have restrictions at private work sites. ,ne of the most effective means of reducing the prevalence of tobacco use is by increasing federal and state e-cise ta- rates. 2 #0= increase in the price of cigarettes can lead to a (= reduction in the demand for cigarettes. .his reduction is the result of people smoking fewer cigarettes or 8uitting altogether. Studies show that low9income, adolescent, @ispanic, and non9 @ispanic black smokers are more likely than others to stop smoking in response to a price increase. .he ?ovember #&&< Daster Settlement 2greement marks the end of the 20th century with an unprecedented event. 2lthough admitting no wrongdoing, the tobacco companies signed an agreement with the attorneys general of (+ states. .his agreement settled lawsuits totaling E20+ billion however, the agreement did not re8uire that any of the state money be spent for tobacco use prevention and control. .he 2merican /egacy "oundation was established as a result of a

provision in the Daster Settlement 2greement that called for a foundation with a mandate to conduct effective tobacco education programs based on scientific research.
uture Cha!!enges

Despite the achievements of the 20th century, appro-imately (< million US adults smoke cigarettes half of those who continue to smoke will die from a smoking9related disease. .obacco use is responsible for appro-imately ('0,000 deaths each year# of every *. Barallel to the health burden is the economic burden of tobacco use, which amounts to at least E*0 billion in medical e-penditures and E*0 billion in indirect costs. %f trends continue, appro-imately * million children living today will die prematurely because they started smoking cigarettes as adolescents. 2dvances have been made in knowledge of tobacco use and its effect on health intervention strategies to reduce these effects remain serious challenges.
FIGURE 3

*rends in Cigarette "mo#ing Among 1)t% Graders, b/ Ra2ial3Et%ni2 Group&United "tates, 1911'199(

"irst, trends from the #&)*9#&&< Donitoring the "uture surveys indicate that the '09day prevalence of tobacco use !smoking on F # of the '0 days before the survey$ among high school seniors decreased from the late #&)0s to the mid9#&<0s, and prevalence was appro-imately '0= however, during #&&#9#&&) smoking prevalence increased to '+.*= !"igure '$. Brevalence among high school seniors today is highest among whites and lowest among blacks. .he recent increases in prevalence highlight the need for a nationwide comprehensive prevention program focused on this age group. Second, decreasing prevalence among adults since the mid9#&+0s has not continued !"igure 2$. Since #&&0, prevalence among both men and women has remained constant !appro-imately 2<.0= for men and appro-imately 22.*= for women$. .he stagnation emphasi6es the need for policy changes that encourage 8uitting and for improved access to proven treatment interventions !eg, "D29approved pharmacotherapy and behavior counseling$. .hird, large differences in tobacco use e-ist in the United States. "or e-ample, in #&&), smoking prevalence was ').&= among 2merican %ndian>2laska ?ative men, '2.#= among black men, and 2).+= among white men. .here are marked differences in deaths from malignant diseases of the respiratory system the age9ad:usted death rates per #00,000 US residents in #&&* were <0.* among black men and *'.) among white men. 2ge9ad:usted death rates for cerebrovascular disease also reflect the disparity in health outcomes, with the rate being *'.# per #00,000 among black men and 2+.' among white men.

?o single factor determines the patterns of tobacco use among racial>ethnic groups these patterns result from comple- interactions among multiple factors, such as socioeconomic status, cultural characteristics, acculturation, stress, biological elements, targeted advertising, price of tobacco products, and varying capacities of communities to mount effective tobacco9control initiatives. .hese disparities in use and adverse health outcomes based on race>ethnicity and socioeconomic status need to be addressed. "ourth, e-posure to environmental tobacco smoke at home and at work is a substantial problem. ,ne study found that <).&= of children and adult nonusers of tobacco had detectable levels of serum cotinine. .he distribution of serum cotinine levels is bimodalG one peak for nonsmokers e-posed to environmental smoke and a higher one for smokers. Hoth the number of smokers in the household and the hours e-posed at work were associated with increased serum cotinine levels among nonsmokers. "ifth, research is needed to determine whether new 5highly engineered7 products can reduce the harmful effects of tobacco, or whether the mistakes associated with low9tar and low9nicotine cigarettes will be repeated. Several novel tobacco products, !eg, bidis from %ndia$ appear to be increasing in popularity, but little is known about long9term health effects or about social and other factors associated with their use. Si-th, a dramatic increase in tobacco use has occurred worldwide. Hecause of the increase, the 1orld @ealth ,rgani6ation !1@,$ established the .obacco "ree %nitiative, and the 1orld @ealth 2ssembly unanimously approved the development of a "ramework 3onvention on .obacco 3ontrol. .his 1@, effort will promote global cooperation on aspects of tobacco control that transcend national boundaries and will necessitate political action mobili6ation of resources and implementation of national, regional, and global strategies. Duch remains to be done despite the public health achievements in reducing tobacco use in the 20th century. .he 2merican 3ancer Society has set goals for 20#* of a 2*= reduction in cancer incidence and a *0= reduction in cancer mortality. 2ppro-imately *0= of that goal can be achieved with a (0= to *0= reduction in smoking prevalence by 200*. 3ommensurate with the cost of the harm caused by tobacco, resources must be e-pended, including programs preventing adolescents from starting to smoke, getting adults and young people to 8uit smoking, and eliminating e-posure to enviromental tobacco smoke and disparities among population groups.

%ttp43355562an2ernet5or#62om3lung72an2er32ontent3arti2le3101803(139(