Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 3741 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t792306965
Suzannah J. Ferraiolia; Sandra L. Harrisa a Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA Online publication date: 19 December 2009
To cite this Article Ferraioli, Suzannah J. and Harris, Sandra L.(2010) 'The Impact of Autism on Siblings', Social Work in
Social Work in Mental Health, 8:4153, 2010 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1533-2985 print/1533-2993 online DOI: 10.1080/15332980902932409
1533-2993 1533-2985 WSMH Social Work in Mental Health, Health Vol. 8, No. 1, October 2009: pp. 00
We have summarized the research on the impact of the behavior a brother or sister with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) on typically developing siblings across the life cycle. The siblings cognitive development and emotional/affective development influence how they perceive and interpret the behavior of the child with an ASD. Similarly, the intellectual ability, behavior, and degree of interpersonal access of the child with ASD impacts the relationship between the two children, as does the response of parents to the needs of all the children in the family. These challenges continue into adulthood with the typically developing brother or sister often feeling an ongoing sense of responsibility for the welfare of the sibling with ASD. The majority of siblings of children with ASDs function well as children, adolescents, and adults. KEYWORDS Autism, siblings, life cycle
Because of the impact of a child with autism on the functioning of the entire family, the concept of the family life cycle is useful to people who study the experience of people with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and their families (e.g., Harris, 1987; Harris, Boyle, Fong, Gill, & Stanger, 1987). The primary objective of the present special issue on the family life cycle is to consider the impact of the special needs of a person with an ASD on the normative life cycle events of the family. Our focus in the present article is on siblings and it seems appropriate to approach that question in part by reflecting on how the life cycle events of the typically developing child
Address correspondence to Suzannah J. Ferraioli, Douglass Developmental Disabilities Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 151 Ryders Lane, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. E-mail: sferraioli@gmail.com 41
42
interface with her understanding of the child with an ASD. Siblings may be older or younger than the child with an ASD and vary widely in the number of years they are separated in age. We therefore elected to approach this topic from the point of view of how the siblings life cycle events are related to their changing perspective on their relationship to the child on the spectrum as well as the personal psychological vulnerability some of them may encounter. A word about terminology is in order. We use the term autism spectrum disorder to include autistic disorder, Aspergers disorder and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. When the author of an article we cite uses the term autism or autistic we honor that authors preference in discussing the article. The childs understanding of ASD depends in large part on her or his level of cognitive development (Glasberg, 2000). Piaget (1929) wrote that children gain their understanding of the world around them through a developmental lens and that as they mature their comprehension shifts to take into account increasingly abstract knowledge. For the 3-year-old, the 10-year-old, and the 25-year-old the impact of an autism spectrum disorder on a brother or sister, on themselves, and on the family changes as the childs cognitive skills grow more mature. A childs affective state can also have an impact on how information about ASDs or physical illnesses is processed. For example, in the case of diabetes, Carandang, Folkins, Hines, and Stewart (1979) observed in an early study that the siblings of children with diabetes demonstrated a lower level of cognitive understanding of diabetes than would be suggested by their general cognitive development. Recently, Glasberg (2000) found that siblings of children on the autism spectrum may have a more cognitively immature understanding of the causes of autism than one would expect based on their overall level of cognitive functioning. Piaget (1929) suggested that emotionally sensitive topics may be more difficult to process cognitively than those that are not emotionally laden. Thus, a childs understanding of an ASD is based in large part on her or his level of cognitive function, but can also be influenced by affective factors. To appreciate how this conceptualization impacts the life cycle events of the sibling it is useful to look at the functioning of typically developing children across the Piagetian stages of cognitive development. Until the age of about 7 years, children are in what Piaget (1929) called the preoperational stage. During these years the childs thinking is not based on logic, but on their concrete experiences. Abstract terms such as autistic disorder or genetically transmitted are not meaningful. Autism is defined by what they see and hear. That a brother has an ASD may mean that he rides a small yellow bus to school, does not speak, or does not play. There is a good chance that at this age the typically developing child believes he or she can catch autism (Glasberg, 2000).
43
The concrete operational stage is a Piagetian concept (1929) describing how a child processes cognitive information between the ages of 7 and 11 years of age. This is a transitional phase in that children still develop their understanding of the world through their direct experience, but they are now also capable of linking these experiences together in a logical order. Finally, in the formal operational stage beginning at about age 12 years, children are able to think abstractly about what they personally experience as well as to form abstract concepts even in the absence of direct experience (Piaget, 1929). For example, although they cannot see DNA they can understand its role in human development and grasp the notion that a genetic process may be implicated in some cases of ASDs. Describing these developmental changes in cognitive functioning is intended to help the reader appreciate the impact of having a brother/sister with an ASD on the typically developing child at different ages. In the material that follows we discuss in some detail the empirical research on how children of different ages understand autism spectrum disorders and the impact of their brothers or sisters behavior on the life cycle events of the typically developing child.
44
SIBLING RELATIONSHIP
Although there is evidence for some general trends in sibling relationships when one child is typically developing and the other has a disability, the findings are mixed. More optimistic research cites that children between 6 and 15 rate their relationships with their siblings positively (McHale, Sloan, & Simeonsson, 1986). In the McHale et al. sample no differences were observed in the ratings made by children with a sibling on the autism spectrum and those made by children with a sibling with Down syndrome. Other researchers have reported less positive experiences for the siblings of children with ASD than youngsters with other developmental disabilities. For example, Kaminsky and Dewey (2001) found that, compared with siblings of individuals with Down syndrome, the relationships between children with autism and their siblings were characterized by less intimacy, prosocial behavior, and nurturance. Such non-intimate relationships have also been evidenced in siblings of children with developmental disabilities in general (Begun, 1989), and may result from the atypical quality and quantity of social interactions. Children with autism and their siblings reportedly spend less time together than either siblings of children with Down syndrome or siblings in a normative sample (Knott et al., 1995). In addition, the time they do spend together is not qualitatively comparable to interactions between typical siblings. Children with ASDs frequently fail to respond to social interactions, or they may respond in an atypical manner that is difficult for a sibling to interpret. Knott and colleagues (1995) also found that children with autism in their sample responded less positively to siblings than children without autism. Having a sibling with ASD may exact varying effects on different children. A large body of research has reported positive or absent effects of the presence of a child with autism on a siblings adjustment. Macks and Reeve (2007) describe an enhanced self-concept in these siblings compared to the siblings of typical children, which included positive views of the siblings own behavior, intelligence, academic performance, and anxiety. Other studies found no adjustment differences between siblings of children with autism as compared to siblings of typical children (Hastings, 2003a; Hastings, 2007) and siblings of children with Down syndrome (Hastings, 2007; OKelly, 2007). The ability for a child to successfully adjust may be moderated by his or her access to social support and by the severity of the siblings autism (Hastings, 2003b). There have also been some documented negative effects of having a sibling on the autism spectrum. On measures of behavior problems and prosocial behavior, mothers of children with autism reported more negative outcomes for their typically developing children than the mothers of typical siblings (Hastings, 2003a). Poor adjustment outcomes have also been observed in comparison to the siblings of children with other developmental
45
disabilities (Fisman, Wolf, Ellison, & Freeman, 2000; Rossiter & Sharpe, 2001). The presence of a sibling with a disability may also be associated with increased risk for internalizing behavior, such as depression and anxiety (Rossiter & Sharpe, 2001). With these general trends in mind, we will now examine the relationships and challenges specific to siblings as they progress through the developmental stages.
46
overestimate their childrens understanding of ASD (Glasberg, 2000). To protect against false explanations, it may be prudent to expose preschoolers to the basics of the disorder. Except in constellations in which the child with ASD is much younger, this is a time when play and behavior are likely to be of primary interest to the typical sibling. Stoneman (2001) reports high levels of interaction between a typical siblings and children with developmental disabilities during childhood. However, the nature of ASD may present some challenges to the social relationship between siblings. Typical children may experience frustration with rejected or ignored social advances, especially if they do not understand the core social and communication deficits of ASD. In the literature, more role-symmetrical play is enhanced by higher functioning levels of the child with the disability (Stoneman, Brody, & Davis, 1987). The traditional absence of imitation, functional play, and imaginative play may make it hard to engage with a brother or sister with a moderate or severe disability. At this age, being socially reinforced during interactions poses a significant challenge to the child with ASD, but also to the typical sibling. Teaching siblings very basic play-related skills (e.g., getting the childs attention, delivering clear commands, reinforcement) may enhance the likelihood that their interactions with a brother or sister with ASD will be fulfilling for both children. Behavior problems are also likely to be extremely salient to 3- to 6-year-olds. Externalizing behavior, such as aggression, disruption, and stereotypy are liable to catch the attention of very young children. Aggression can be a significant concern from an emotional and a safety perspective. Siblings may not understand aggressive behavior and frequently create rationalizations, such as he doesnt like me or he is mad at me to explain it. Children may also be fearful of their siblings who engage in aggressive behavior; this can be extremely important for their well being considering conflict in sibling relationships has been negatively related to adjustment in the literature (Stormshak et al., 1996). Although it is not dangerous, stereotypy may also be a confusing behavior for young children to interpret. Despite behavioral challenges, siblings at this age have reported to be generally satisfied with their relationships with their brothers and sisters (Rivers & Stoneman, 2003). In some cases, siblings this young may start to take on a care-taking role to a child with ASD. Preschoolers interactions with their siblings have been rated as more nurturing than the interactions between typical siblings (Lobato, Miller, Barbour, Hall, & Pezzullo, 1991). Siblings may help look after younger brothers and sisters, or they may adopt the older sibling role, despite being chronologically younger. These role-shifts may partially explain some of the findings of enhanced self-perception in the siblings of children with ASD, although no studies have empirically examined this relationship.
47
Parents play an important role in moderating the relationships between their typically developing children and the sibling with ASD. Preschoolers spend a significant amount of time at home, and parents are the most salient people in their lives. Having a child with ASD demands ongoing parental involvement, and typical siblings may feel jealousy or resentment because of parents divided attention (Howlin, 1988). Additionally, parental characteristics, such as marital stress, have been shown to moderate the strength of the relationship between children with ASD and their siblings (Rivers & Stoneman, 2003).
48
perceptions of parental favoritism, and feelings of rejection (McHale, Sloan, & Simeonsson, 1986). Last, older children generally develop meaningful relationships with other peers and will spend more time with them than with a sibling. With a mature understanding of the implications of autism, older children face an interesting mix of sophisticated and child-like concerns. In a study of one sample of children (mean age = 10.5 years), participants reported having fun playing with their sibling with ASD, but expressed concerns about embarrassment, and their siblings future (Mascha & Boucher, 2006). Children in another study reported aggression as the most common stressor to their relationships with their siblings with ASD, and the most commonly cited coping strategy was wishful thinking (Ross & Cuskelly, 2006). As peers become important players in their lives, siblings face a new set of concerns. The child with ASDs maladaptive behavior often becomes central to the siblings appraisal. Some take on a protector role, defending the child with ASD from bullying or teasing. Others may experience embarrassment or resentment, if behavior problems limit potential family activities. Because siblings are still dependent in many ways, the interplay between the child, the sibling, and parents is very important. The behavior and needs of a child with ASD may restrict a siblings ability to have friends over or be transported to participate in other activities. Parents may also rely on siblings to baby-sit their brothers and sisters well beyond the age at which they would care for a typically developing sibling. Children who understand ASD as a lifelong disorder may start to think about the long-term implications for their sibling. They understand that their brothers and sisters may not get married, get a job, or live on their own. However, concerns about their siblings future are still minimal at this age, and a full understanding of the impact of ASD on the entire family has not yet matured. In general the preadolescent group tends to deal mainly with personal worries (e.g., embarrassment, inequity), but they start to wrestle with concerns about the sibling with ASD as they approach the teenage years.
49
now anticipate the long-term impact on his brothers/sisters life and realize how limited that life may be. He will also recognize the possibility of transmitting to his own children the genetic material that causes autism. He may ask himself whether he really wants to have children under those conditions. In addition, although it is still a remote event for most adolescents, he will realize that once his parents die he may have responsibility for his sibling on the spectrum and be concerned about that role in his life (Harris & Glasberg, 2003).
Adulthood
One of the major life cycle events of young adulthood is starting a job or career. For many young adults the experience of living with an ASD has an impact on these vocational plans. A study by Martins (2007) of 25 young adult siblings of people with an ASD and 25 young adults whose siblings did not have a chronic disability or illness, showed that the people who grew up with a sibling on the spectrum were more likely to say that their sibling had influenced their career choice and were more likely to be preparing for a human service career than were the comparison group. They were also more likely to report that they had encountered some negative experiences during childhood because of their sibling on the spectrum. Marriage and creating a family of ones own are other major life cycle events that are normative for many adults. Although there are few if any data looking at how adult siblings respond to these opportunities, there is a fair amount of anecdotal evidence suggesting that these events pose significant problems for some adult siblings. Beginning in their teenage years many young people begin to reflect on whether they want to have children (Glasberg, 2000) because of the risk of having a child with autism. Some doubtless decide the risk is too great, while others will elect to take a chance. Should they decide not to have children they will find their pool of potential marital partners narrowed as many young people view raising children as a central part of their future lives. In adulthood one also faces the reality of the aging and ultimate death of ones parents. Although teenagers worry about this painful event (Glasberg, 2000), it is usually adults who encounter the reality. With the failing health of their parents adult siblings may take on a greater supervisory role for their sibling on the spectrum than they had in the past. Some people with ASDs have significant cognitive deficits as well and may have remained in their parents home well into adulthood. In a study of siblings of adults with mental retardation who were living in the parental home, Griffiths and Unger (1994) found that about half of the adult siblings said they would be willing to take on a caretaker role in the future, but parents reported that they were reluctant to cast them in this role. This reluctance may make the transition to sibling-as-caretaker a more complex process than when families have agreed on a plan well in advance of parental illness and death.
50
The aging of parents requires the family to make a decision about a suitable living arrangement for the adult on the spectrum. In some cases a typically developing sibling may bring the person into his or her home, while in others, a group home or supervised apartment may be a preferred solution. Even if the sibling on the spectrum is able to live on his or her own, there is often greater oversight required for the person with a spectrum disorder than for other adults. Finally, even as he or she grieves the death of his or her parents, the typically developing sibling may grieve essentially alone as his or her sibling on the spectrum may have difficulty understanding the death of a parent and be unable to fully empathize with the sense of loss that is typical for adult children who lose a parent. In each of these examples the life cycle events follow a very different pattern than one would define as normative in Western culture.
IN CLOSING
The majority of brothers and sisters of children with ASDs function well as children, adolescents, and adults. Although being the sibling of a person with an ASD does have an impact on them that does not mean the influence is a psychologically harmful one. There are a smaller group of siblings who do exhibit problematic issues. Some of these people may have been born with the broad autism phenotype (BAP) and been especially vulnerable to challenges in adaptation. Others may have grown up in families that were not able to teach them effective coping methods for addressing their concerns about their siblings ASD or in families that were so preoccupied with the needs of the child on the spectrum that they were unable to respond to the needs of the typically developing child. Although there is a modest body of research on the sibling experience, much remains to be learned. There are a number of variables that merit study such as the most effective coping styles for children whose siblings fall at various points on the spectrum, as well as a need for research on the most effective ways for parents and professionals to provide support to the child who has a brother or sister with autism. We also know relatively little about the adult who has a brother or sister with an ASD and how the specific diagnosis influences the extended life cycle of both the person with an ASD and the sibling. Even in the best functioning of families with the most resilient children, having a brother or sister with an ASD does alter normative life cycle events. We have seen that very clearly in some of the life cycle events of the typically developing siblings whose vocational, marital, and family planning goals may be influenced. It is also evident in the atypical caretaker role that many adult siblings ultimately assume for their brother or sister with an ASD.
Downloaded At: 15:23 29 November 2010
51
REFERENCES
Begun, A.L. (1989). Sibling relationships involving developmentally disabled people. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93(5), 566574. Bibace, R., & Walsh, M.E. (1980). Development of childrens concepts of illness. Pediatrics, 66(6), 912917. Carandang, M.L.A., Folkins, C.H., Hines, P.A., & Stewart, M.S. (1979). The role of cognitive level and sibling illness in childrens conceptualizations of illness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 474481. Diamond, K.E., & Hestenes, L.L. (1996). Preschool childrens conceptions of disabilities: The salience of disability in childrens ideas about others. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16(4), 458476. Eisenberg, L., Baker, B.L., Blacher, J. (1998). Siblings of children with mental retardation living at home or in residential placement. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39, 355363. Fisman, S., Wolf, L., Ellison, D., & Freeman, T. (2000). A longitudinal study of siblings of children with chronic disabilities. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45(4), 369375. Folstein, S.E., & Rutter, M. (1977). Infantile autism: A genetic study of 21 twin pairs. Journal of Child psychology and Psychiatry, 18, 297321. Glasberg, B.A. (1999). The development of a childs appraisal of a siblings autism. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(B12), 6488. Glasberg, B.A. (2000). The development of siblings understanding of autism and related disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 143156. Griffiths, D.L., & Unger, D.G. (1994). Views about planning for the future among parents and siblings of adults with mental retardation. Family Relations, 43, 221227. Harris, S.L. (1987). The family crisis: Diagnosis of a severely disabled child. In M. Ferrari & M.B. Sussman (Eds.), Childhood disability and family systems (pp. 107118). New York: The Haworth Press. Harris, S.L., Boyle, T.D., Fong, P., Gill, M.J., & Stanger, C. (1987). Families of developmentally disabled children. In M.L. Wolriach & D. Routh (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics, Vol. 8 (pp. 4973). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Harris, S.L., & Glasberg, B.A. (2003). Siblings of children with autism: A guide for families (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House. Hastings, R.P. (2003a). Brief Report: Behavioral adjustment of siblings of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(1), 99104. Hastings, R.P. (2003b). Behavioral adjustment of siblings of children with autism engaged in applied behavior analysis early intervention programs: The moderating role of social support. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(2), 141150. Kaminsky, L., & Dewey, D. (2001). Sibling relationships of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 399410. Knott, F., Lewis, C., & Williams, T. (1995). Sibling interaction of children with learning disabilities: A comparison of autism and Downs Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 965976.
52
Macks, R.J., & Reeve, R.E. (2007). The adjustment of non-disabled siblings of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 10601067. Hastings, R.P. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between sibling behaviorial adjustment and behavior problems of children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 14851492. Howlin, P. (1988). Living with impairment: The effects on children of having an autistic sibling. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 14, 395408. Lobato, D., Miller, C.T., Barbour, L., Hall, L.J., & Pezzullo, J. (1991). Preschool siblings of handicapped children: Interactions with mothers, brothers, and sisters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 387399. Martins, M. (2007). Siblings of individuals with autism: Perceptions of the sibling experience, psychological functioning, and the developmental tasks of young adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ. Mascha, K., & Boucher, J. (2006). Preliminary investigation of a qualitative method of examining siblings experiences of living with a child with ASD. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 1928. McHale, S.M., Sloan, J., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1986). Sibling relationships of children with autistic, mentally retarded, and nonhandicapped brothers and sisters. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16(4), 399413. OKelley, S.E. (2007). Individual and family influences on the adjustment and functioning of siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders or down syndrome. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(2B), 1316. Piaget, J. (1929). The childs conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Rivers, J.W., & Stoneman, Z. (2003). Sibling relationships when a child has autism: Marital stress and support coping. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(4), 383394. Ross, P., & Cuskelly, M. (2006). Adjustment, sibling problems and coping strategies of brothers and sisters of children with autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(2), 7786. Rossiter, L., & Sharpe, D. (2001). The siblings of individuals with mental retardation: A quantitative integration of the literature. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 6584. Rutter, M. (2000). Genetic studies of autism: From the 1970s into the millennium. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 314. Serafica, F.C., & Sweazy, L.B. (August 1982). Developmental analysis of childrens conceptions of learning disability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association in Washington, DC. Smith, L.A., & Williams, J.M. (2004). Childrens understanding of the causal origins of disability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(3), 383397. Smith, L.A., & Williams, J.M. (2001). Childrens understanding of the physical, cognitive and social consequences of impairments. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(6), 603617. Stoneman, Z. (2001). Supporting positive sibling relationships during childhood. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews , 7, 134142.
53
Stoneman, Z., Brody, G.H., & Davis, C.H. (1987). Mentally retarded children and their older siblings: Naturalistic in-home observations. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 290298. Stormshak, E.A., Bellanti, C.J., Bierman, K.L., Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., Greenberg, M.T., Lochman, J.E., & McMahon, R.J. (1996). The quality of sibling relationships and the development of social competence and behavioral control in aggressive children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 7989. Sullivan, M., Finelli, J., Marvin, A., Garrett-Mayer, E., Bauman, M., & Landa, R. (2007). Response to joint attention in toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: A prospective study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 3748.