Slide 1

Publ
Slide 2

Nothing better than seeing your name in lights!

• Parker, P.,
Physical A

• Parker, P.,
effects on
25, 68-75.

• Parker, P. D
of curricul
Learning a
Slide 3

G
the world rejections rates tend to be around 50%.  Be pr
1.Even with some of the most highly published and cited psychologists in

2. From submission to review rarely takes less than three months. From
review to revise and resubmit can take just as long and when finally
accepted be prepared to use “in press” for quite some time.
3. For me my particular interest is in latent and multi-level modelling. Thus
in every article I write, I push its content as being more than just a

 Be pr
substantive article but something that holds methodological implications.
4. Substantive papers with strong methodological implications often have
an advantage in applied journals but be aware of the need to consider
right from the outset how your findings can be applied by practitioners.
5. Will your supervisor want to go as first author regardless of your
contribution? Will he/she allow you to go first if you do most of the work?
Who should you include as co-authors? Remember “what you lose on the
see-saw, you can make up on the merry-go-round”.
 Be aw
6. Journals often have extremely strict word limits and do not appreciate
excessive length, in-text citations, or tables and figures. Do not think one

recei
paper can change the world or even your field. Be realistic in the need to
set up the story of the paper but acknowledge the limits on how much you
can include. Remember one of an editors primary concerns is page length.
7. Often a thesis will include the opportunity for multiple publications.
With this in mind it can be tempting to write a conference paper outlining
some of the findings with the knowledge that you can do a major paper
for a journal later. HOWEVER, most journals will not allow you to publish

 Be aw
findings that have been published elsewhere. As this is the case, plan your

2000
major paper first and quarantine those findings before looking for a quick
kill on a conference paper.
8. Be aware of short research reports which still count as a paper but are
often more realistic targets for thesis based research.
9. If a MS is on your desk it is not on an editors and reviewers desk. Given
the lead time that is involved with a journal publications this is
unaffordable waste of time.
Slide 4

Journ
• This is likely to sound somewhat opportunist and not in the spirit of
intellectual enterprise but quality of the journal is more important than
exact fit of an article to a specific journal. The facts are that non-ISI
ranked journals may be just as likely to reject your work as the most

 Be aware of IS
prestigious journal, means it is in your interests to publish in a journal
that impacts the wider academic community.
• Start by writing your MS with a few journals in mind. Once written
review the journals and make a judgement about which of the highest
ranked ISI journals you can get it into. Once this is decided ENSURE you
have referenced articles from this journal and display awareness of the
journal content by adjusting the level of applied v substantive v
methodology influence to suit. Also be aware that if it is a general
journal (e.g. Journal of Applied Psychology) be sure to address how your

 Be aware of w
findings can be generalised beyond your specific sample. I recently had
an article rejected from Work & Stress largely because the sample was
clergy and I had not taken enough care on showing how findings for

awareness of t
clergy could be expanded to other professions.
• For me my latent modelling skills are fairly good and are rarely utilised
effectively in applied papers. As such I try to play up the importance of
these skills and how they have been missing from previous research.
• STICK TO THE PAGE LIMIT. I get the feeling from editors that they are
often as interested in whether the article will fit within page constraints
as they are whether the content is of sufficient quality.
• Nothing is likely to put an editor or review off as much as sloppy
referencing and a lack of attention to detail.

 Play to your st
• You never know who the reviews will be and at our stage in our careers
we do not have the clout to really make a critical approach worthwhile.
So unless it is critical to your paper avoid where possible being critical
of others.
Slide 5

IS
ISI web of kn
subject categ
Slide 6

Jour
• Most journal reject around 90 of percent of papers. I had lunch with
professor Herb Marsh (one of the most highly productive and well cited
psychologists in the world) a few weeks ago and even he suggested he
gets around 50% of papers rejected on their first go. It does not mean

• Do not be disc
you are inferior or that your work was terrible and sometimes a
rejection can be a matter of unfortunate choice of reviewers, editors
with an axe to grind, wrong place wrong time.
• If you get rejected you will always get feedback. THIS IS INVALUABLE in
trying to get it published elsewhere. Keep it, read it all, review it when
ever you are writing a similar paper. This is also the benefit of going to
a highly ranked journal first as if you are lucky you will get it accepted
and if not you will get feedback from the best people in the field and
thus have a far better chance of publishing elsewhere.
• Never Ever Ever Ever get rejected and throw the paper away. Use the

• Read over criti

feedback and prepare it for somewhere else. Also do not view a
rejection as an indication that you will need to send it to a far inferior
outlet to get it published. Just keep working down the list you prepared
at the outset of writing the paper. Indeed I have had a paper rejected
from a conference and then used the feedback to get it published in a
journal.
• Nothing cures the MS rejection blues more than having the article of to
a new journal (remember it is better for it to be on someone else's desk
than yours). I have a policy of trying to have it submitted to a new

• Re-work.
journal in 48 hours. Indeed this has happened twice this week.
Slide 7

• This is probably the best news you can hope for as VERY few articles
get accepted straight up. Indeed when all reviews have outright
accepted my MS with no changes the editor still gave me a revise and
resubmit for cosmetic changes.

This
• When you submit an article it is yours to win. When you get a revise

•
and resubmit it is yours to lose. If you carefully respond to reviewers
comments, are humble in accepting critiques, and are tougher,
respectful, and thankful you are more than likely to get accepted the
next time around.
• Editors comments are in many respects the most important to address
in detail and, if they conflict with reviewers, give precedents to them.
This is because an editor will see your revised copy but a review may
not.
• Respond to the editors and reviewers comments separately. Respond to

• Yours
each point of each review separately even if someone else has brought
it up.
• The goal of a good revision is to provide so much detail in the revision
letter that the editor does not have to reread the paper. Remember
that every time it is reread there is an additional chance for problems
or critiques to be found.

• Whe
comm
Slide 8

Journ
Pretty self explanatory really but there is nothing more embarrassing than
getting your name or affiliation, or that of a co-authors wrong. When you
receive the proofs go over each and every word in a printed and then
electronic copy.

• Go over every
– A) Names
– B) Affiliations
– C) References
Slide 9

Posters are great fun more relaxed and far more beneficial for networking.

• Poste
Conferences are good fun but should be side projects to use your
conference funding from the university. They are NOT the place for the
best research you have to offer.

prese
Some conferences like AERA let you publish your paper after presenting it.
Others will not. Don’t let your self get stuck with a good paper that will
never see the light of day because it was presented in some small
conference somewhere.

• Reme
pape
Slide 10

Sha
Beside having an article published in a top journal the next most
important thing is to have it cited. Even in top journals you may only get a

 The i
few people who read your article for whom the content will be relevant for
their own research. With this in mind it is often a good idea to try and
promote your research with outside channels. One I have yet to do but will
be doing in my work next year is writing press releases of major research
findings. Other ideas that have been utilised very well by younger
researchers, particularly grad students, is the use of blogs and on line
forums.

 Do n

 Utilis
Slide 11