Winter 2013
ACTSC231 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 1
Mackay Anne
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 33, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 39, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 36, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 30, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 34, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 23, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 33, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 18, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 44, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 17, No text required: 8, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 9 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3
38% (71 of 185) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC231 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 2
Bernard Carole
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
79% (11 of 14) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC232 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 3
Adcock James
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 69, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 79, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 60, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 50, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 75, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 23, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 6, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 41 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 36, Interesting: 53, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 64, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 84, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 54, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 60, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 55, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 1, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 86, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 19, 3-6 hours: 59, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
68% (97 of 143) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC331 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 4
Cui Zhenyu
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 11, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 19, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
49% (47 of 95) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC371 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 5
Matheson Brenton James
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 23, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 61, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 35, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 20, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 25, Often enough: 21, Not often enough: 11, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 20, No opinion: 9 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 19, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 72, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 61, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 46, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 28, No text required: 5, No opinion: 18 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 77, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 30, 3-6 hours: 47, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2
40% (95 of 236) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC371 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 6
Bernard Carole
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 2, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
50% (9 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC372 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 7
Wood Peter J
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 64, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 10, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 67, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 69, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 54, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 71, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 35, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 16, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 35 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 45, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 64, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 81, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 62, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 43, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 20, No text required: 8, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 75, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 90, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 62, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
57% (101 of 176) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC433/ACTSC833 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 8
Cai Jun
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 28, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 24, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 58, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 44, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 22, No opinion: 12 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
59% (65 of 111) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 9
Wang Ruodu
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 45, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 39, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 59, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 38, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 12, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 42, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 21, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 46 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 63, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 9 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 24, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 31, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 73, 75-90%: 22, 50-75%: 9, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 69, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 27, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 29, No text required: 20, No opinion: 22 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 33, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 83, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
59% (107 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC453/ACTSC853 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 10
Johnston Ricky Mark
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 5, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
35% (30 of 85) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
ACTSC462/ACTSC862 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 11
Lennox William Scott
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 39, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 62, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 26, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 28, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 36, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 7, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 43 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 29, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 40, No opinion: 5 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 15, No opinion: 12 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 61, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 4 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 6, No opinion: 14 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 38, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 3
65% (73 of 113) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH231 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 12
Hewitt Conrad G
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 28, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 30, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 19, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 31, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 37, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 46, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 35, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0
67% (49 of 73) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH242/CS371 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 13
Ivan Lucian
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 2, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 33, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2
57% (41 of 72) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH250 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 14
West Joseph John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 89, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 97, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 74, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 81, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 93, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 37, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 38 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 30, Interesting: 65, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 7 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 92, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 90, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 53, Helpful: 53, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 57, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 13 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 69, No opinion: 13 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 92, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 74, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 14, 3-6 hours: 75, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0
56% (111 of 198) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 15
Krivodonova Lilia
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 2, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 4, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 6, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
65% (34 of 52) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH332/PMATH332 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 16
Moshksar Kamyar
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 7, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
62% (31 of 50) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH342 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 17
De Sterck Hans
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 15, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 15, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
90% (19 of 21) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH350 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 18
Harmsworth David L
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 52, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 58, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 57, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 51, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 58, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 25, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 29 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 51, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 7 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 56, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 59, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 51, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 52, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 67, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 52, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
66% (78 of 118) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH353 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 19
Hewitt Conrad G
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 12, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 17 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 29, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 0
61% (33 of 54) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH361 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 20
Waite Michael L.
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 28, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 23, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 23, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 17, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 26, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 22, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
78% (35 of 45) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH373 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 21
Miskovic Zoran
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH391 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 22
Vrscay Edward R
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 4, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
75% (15 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH451 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 23
Siegel David
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 15, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0
64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
AMATH455/AMATH655 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 24
Chang Dong Eui
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 1, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
78% (18 of 23) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
Course Evaluations
Page 25
Girelli Florian
AMATH475/AMATH675/PHYS476 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 12, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 24, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 14, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 16, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 18, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3
70% (43 of 61) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO227 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 26
Roh Patrick Young
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 18, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 15, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 12, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 17, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
52% (32 of 62) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO250 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 27
Koenemann Jochen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 23, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 23, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 21, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 24, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 34, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2
48% (50 of 104) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO250 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 28
Georgiou Konstantinos
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 16, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 20 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 16, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 22, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 0
47% (56 of 118) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO250 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 29
New Stephen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
78% (14 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO327 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 30
Roh Patrick Young
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 0 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 10, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
58% (18 of 31) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO331 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 31
Jao David
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 6, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
55% (23 of 42) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO367 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 32
Wolkowicz Henry
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 1, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 1, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 1, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
45% (10 of 22) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO370 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 33
Swamy Chaitanya
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 14, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 3, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 45, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 17, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
63% (59 of 93) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO372 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 34
Georgiou Konstantinos
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 24, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 21, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 15, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 22, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 20, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 23, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 2, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 13, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 19, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 4
52% (62 of 119) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO444/CO644 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 35
Godsil Christopher D
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3
95% (20 of 21) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO452/CO652 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 36
Guenin Bertrand
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 10, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 18, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3
90% (19 of 21) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO481/CS467/PHYS467 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 37
Mosca Michele
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 15, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 0
52% (30 of 58) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CO487/CO687 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 38
Jao David
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 46, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 54, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 42, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 44, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 40, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 47 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 49, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 50, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 60, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 38, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 66, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 3
63% (72 of 115) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM101 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 39
Sproule Robert J
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
34% (12 of 35) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM102 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 40
Sproule Robert J
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
50% (9 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM321 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 41
Blake William Peter Thomas
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
64% (29 of 45) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM400 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 42
Arnason Mark
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 20, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 33, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2
92% (34 of 37) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM421 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 43
Matheson Brenton James
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 4, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
57% (31 of 54) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
COMM432 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 44
Liu Zhiyong Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 7, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 5, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
83% (15 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS115 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 45
Fourquet Elodie Cecile Diane
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 19, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 21, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 7, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1
33% (33 of 99) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS115 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 46
Sakhnini Victoria
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 23, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 28, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 27, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 13, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 26, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 16, No text required: 2, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 25, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1
60% (58 of 97) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS115 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 47
Sakhnini Victoria
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 16, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 19, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 15, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 8, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 3
47% (45 of 96) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS115 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 48
Graham Sandra Lynn
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 6, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
28% (23 of 83) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 49
Shaikh Maheen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 1, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 2, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
16% (12 of 74) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 50
Vasiga Troy Michael John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 56, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 60, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 45, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 58, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 62, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 28, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 34, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 63, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 64, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 43, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 21, No opinion: 15 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 34, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 6
80% (76 of 95) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 51
Kharal Rosina
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 7, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
35% (28 of 80) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 52
Case Lori
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 29, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 24, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 31, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 29, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 28, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 6, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 15, No opinion: 19 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 28, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 3
58% (58 of 100) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 53
Shaikh Maheen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 5, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
17% (16 of 96) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 54
Kharal Rosina
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 20, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 7, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 2
36% (35 of 98) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 007 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 55
Vasiga Troy Michael John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 41, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 38, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 35, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 34, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 41, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 12, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 39, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 9, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3
78% (46 of 59) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 008 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 56
Dean-Hall Adriel
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 1, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 0, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 3, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2
18% (12 of 67) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS116 Section 009 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 57
Case Lori
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 18, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 18, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 12, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 6, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 4
36% (29 of 80) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS135 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 58
Champaign John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 19, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 23, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 1, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 3 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 11, > 15 hours: 3
46% (37 of 80) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS135 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 59
Ashkan Azin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 23, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 32, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 21, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 23, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 11 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 21, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 1, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 2
48% (43 of 90) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 60
Salinger Alejandro
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 7
68% (27 of 40) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 61
Petrick Mark
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 37, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 37, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 32, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 32, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 39, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 35, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 58, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 39, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 15, No text required: 5, No opinion: 18 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 26, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 34, 11-15 hours: 12, > 15 hours: 12
67% (68 of 102) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 62
Lushman Bradley Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 30, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 47, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 32, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 26, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 30, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 40 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 38, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 32, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 6 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 9, No opinion: 26 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 29, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 24, 11-15 hours: 16, > 15 hours: 9
60% (62 of 104) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 63
Petrick Mark
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 45, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 50, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 42, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 41, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 39, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 31, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 46, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 7, No opinion: 20 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 13, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 34, 11-15 hours: 12, > 15 hours: 8
61% (63 of 103) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 64
Tompkins Dave
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 64, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 67, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 56, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 53, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 65, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 40, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 66, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 66, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 4, No opinion: 36 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 50, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 34, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 29, 11-15 hours: 24, > 15 hours: 6
76% (78 of 103) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS136 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 65
Harji Ashif S
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 5, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
44% (18 of 41) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS138 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 66
Godfrey Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 29, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 48, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 29, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 15, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 44, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 7, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 50 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 41, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 24, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 62, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 8, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 33, No opinion: 11 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 30, No opinion: 22 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 8, Too little: 3, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 21, Too little: 4, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 14, 3-6 hours: 46, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3
54% (78 of 144) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS146 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 67
Ragde Prabhakar
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 23, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 27, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 26, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 35, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 33, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 2
80% (44 of 55) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS230 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 68
Graham Sandra Lynn
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 3, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 20, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 37 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 22, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 44, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 34, No opinion: 17 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 19, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
52% (63 of 122) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS240 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 69
Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 42 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 54, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 18, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 28, No opinion: 21 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 22, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 2
53% (62 of 118) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS240 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 70
Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 10, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 11, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 18, No opinion: 16 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 1
40% (45 of 113) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS241 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 71
Cormack Gordon V
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 23, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 16, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 22, No opinion: 12 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 1
31% (36 of 115) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS241 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 72
Cormack Gordon V
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 42, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 69, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 38, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 26, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 42, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 20, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 43 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 32, Interesting: 45, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 46, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 60, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 55, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 58, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 58, No opinion: 16 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 73, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 30, 11-15 hours: 17, > 15 hours: 4
82% (82 of 100) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS245 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 73
Ben-David Shai
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 5, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 20 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 14, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 6 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 38, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
46% (48 of 105) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS246 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 74
Holt Richard
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 3, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 5, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 13, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 5
40% (42 of 104) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS251 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 75
Ivkovic Igor
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 46, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 36, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 26, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 21, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 33, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 21, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 4, No opinion: 23 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
61% (61 of 100) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS251 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 76
Ivkovic Igor
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 15, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 11, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 0, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
36% (36 of 99) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS330 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 77
Ataullah Ahmed Ayaz
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 37, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 26, No opinion: 15 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
39% (52 of 135) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS335 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 78
Forsyth Peter
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 15, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 30, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 18, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 6
61% (44 of 72) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS338 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 79
Champaign John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 35, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 27, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 32, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 21, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 26, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 10, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 15 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 45, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 31, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 22, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
67% (73 of 109) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS341 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 80
Chan Timothy
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 37, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 27, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 32, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 31, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 12, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 29 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 36, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 51, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 40, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 21, No opinion: 17 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3
66% (57 of 86) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS341 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 81
Chan Timothy
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 64, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 24, Just right: 62, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 59, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 51, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 55, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 53 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 41, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 71, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 76, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 72, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 28, No opinion: 35 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 65, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 41, 7-10 hours: 35, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 1
93% (88 of 95) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS341 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 82
Truszkowski Jakub Michal
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 15, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2
36% (21 of 59) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS343 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 83
Wong Bernard
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 43, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 28, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 33, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 19, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 28, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 33, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 34, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 2
65% (49 of 75) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS348 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 84
Aboulnaga Ashraf
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 35, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 45, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 41, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 28, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 30, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 18, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 32, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 25, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 20, No opinion: 12 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 9, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
60% (56 of 94) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS349 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 85
Lank Edward
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 30, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 34, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 30, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 39, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 26, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 38, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 42, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 21, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 11
61% (52 of 85) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS349 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 86
Lank Edward
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 42, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 64, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 53, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 30, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 57, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 56 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 22, Interesting: 50, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 49, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 54, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 21, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 7 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 50, No opinion: 24 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 66, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 16, Somewhat too much: 32, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 29, 11-15 hours: 19, > 15 hours: 19
70% (80 of 114) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS350 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 87
Brecht Timothy
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 30, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 36, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 23, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 36, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 34, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 8, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 23, No opinion: 19 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 18
80% (57 of 71) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS350 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 88
Brecht Timothy
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 26, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 29, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 17, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 26, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 12, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 26, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 13 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 10
53% (38 of 72) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS360 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 89
Watrous John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 18, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 16, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 4, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
70% (30 of 43) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS365 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 90
Shallit Jeffrey O
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
79% (11 of 14) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS370 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 91
Li Yu Ying
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 16, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 16, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 37, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 25, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1
60% (47 of 78) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS430 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 92
Safayeni Suzanne
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 12, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 10, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 39, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 4, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 14, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
66% (52 of 79) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS432 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 93
Safayeni Suzanne
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 24, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
69% (33 of 48) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS436 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 94
Limam Noura
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
45% (31 of 69) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS442/CS642 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 95
Lushman Bradley Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 29, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 28, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 23, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 30, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 24, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 29, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 25, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 9, > 15 hours: 1
66% (38 of 58) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS444/CS644 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 96
Lhotak Ondrej
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 11, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 15
59% (29 of 49) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS445/CS645/ECE451 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 97
Treer Richard
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 0, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 1, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 0, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 0, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 0, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 0, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 12, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 14, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 11, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
43% (25 of 58) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS446/CS646/ECE452 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 98
Holmes Reid Thomas
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 1, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 12, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2
62% (24 of 39) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS450/CS650 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 99
Morton Andrew
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 16, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 0, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3
64% (30 of 47) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS452/CS652 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 100
Cowan William B
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 10, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 9, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 0, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 13
65% (13 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS454/CS654 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 101
Daudjee Khuzaima
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2
54% (28 of 52) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS454/CS654 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 102
Daudjee Khuzaima
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 15, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 12, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 7, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2
59% (29 of 49) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS456/CS656 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 103
Limam Noura
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 5, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 3, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
36% (30 of 83) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS458/CS658 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 104
Hengartner Urs
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 1, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 0, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 5, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 3, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
38% (18 of 48) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS458/CS658 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 105
Hengartner Urs
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 16, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 3, No opinion: 16 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
63% (41 of 65) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS462/CS662 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 106
Shallit Jeffrey O
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 14, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 15, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 13, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
67% (16 of 24) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS475/CS675 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 107
Wan Justin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 12, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 11, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
75% (15 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS476/CS676 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 108
Li Yu Ying
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 11, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 21, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 3
63% (38 of 60) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS483/CS683 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 109
Burkowski Forbes
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 5, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 4, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
73% (8 of 11) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS484/CS684 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 110
Mann Richard
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 3 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 12, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0
63% (20 of 32) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS485/CS685 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 111
Ben-David Shai
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 11, Somewhat too high: 19, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 6, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 24 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 23, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 7, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 2, No opinion: 3 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 1
73% (54 of 74) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS486/CS686 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 112
Hoey Jesse
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 13, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 20, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 16, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 2, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2
53% (29 of 55) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS487/CS687/CM730 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 113
Storjohann Arne
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 2, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 3, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 2, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
50% (10 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS488/CS688 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 114
Mann Stephen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 16, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 18, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 18, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 22, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 19, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 12, No opinion: 12 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 1, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 18
81% (34 of 42) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS490 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 115
Tompkins Dave
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
84% (21 of 25) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
CS492/CS692 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 116
Cohen Robin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 23, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 30 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 22, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 26, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 33, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
95% (37 of 39) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATBUS470 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 117
Freeland R Keith
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 17, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 14, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 20 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 14, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 31, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
62% (46 of 74) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATBUS471 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 118
Wood Peter J
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 14, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 24, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 4, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
64% (32 of 50) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATBUS472 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 119
Freeland R Keith
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 2, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 20, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2
65% (30 of 46) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH104 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 120
Ali Akbari Shahla
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
39% (25 of 64) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH106 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 121
Celmins Uldis Alfred
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 26, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 8, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 35, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
45% (43 of 95) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH127 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 122
Beltaos Andrew
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 27, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 4, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 30, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 25, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 27, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 26, No opinion: 9 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 26, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 44, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 55, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 19, No text required: 3, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 53, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
80% (70 of 87) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH127 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 123
Beltaos Andrew
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 10 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 14, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 33, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 3, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
53% (49 of 93) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH127 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 124
Ng Wai Man
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
39% (35 of 90) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 125
Sweeney Vincent Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 27, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 31, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 25, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 31, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 33 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 24, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 32, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 35, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 2, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1
67% (63 of 94) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 126
Loo Clinton
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 62, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 60, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 54, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 53, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 60, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 28, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 13, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 46, Not Interesting: 21, No opinion: 11 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 60, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 70, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 11, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 58, No opinion: 9 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 48, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 3, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 40, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 52, 7-10 hours: 27, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
94% (88 of 94) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 127
Smith Paula T.
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 2, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 24, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
33% (30 of 92) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 128
Loo Clinton
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 49, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 58, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 40, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 49, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 41, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 27, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 39, Not Interesting: 22, No opinion: 11 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 40, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 53, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 51, No opinion: 6 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 19, No text required: 2, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 31, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 69, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 52, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
66% (79 of 119) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 129
Ivan Lucian
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 15, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
38% (33 of 87) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH128 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 130
Smith Paula T.
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 0, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
39% (30 of 76) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 131
Chan Kai Cheong
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 27, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 18, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 33, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 3
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 11, No text required: 4, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 27, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1
45% (53 of 117) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 132
Akash Mukto
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 37, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 36, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 33, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 29, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 35, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 34, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 36, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 3, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 34, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 32, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2
52% (63 of 122) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 133
Moshksar Kamyar
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 6 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 4, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
34% (33 of 96) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 134
Pei Martin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 63, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 62, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 46, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 53, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 52, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 39, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 31, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 64, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 74, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 59, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 14 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 26, No opinion: 19 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 71, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 54, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0
64% (88 of 137) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 135
Brydon Dale
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 7, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 0
31% (33 of 108) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 136
Akash Mukto
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 26, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 28, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 20, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 26, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 19, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 30, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 3, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2
32% (39 of 121) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH135 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 137
Pretti John-Paul C
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 8, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 9, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 12, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 4, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 4, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
34% (13 of 38) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 138
Dupont Edward
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 81, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 10, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 92, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 90, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 69, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 82, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 43, Most of the time: 32, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 31 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 33, Interesting: 61, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 88, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 99, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 45, Helpful: 70, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 34, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 12 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 56, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 24, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 96, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 13, 3-6 hours: 64, 7-10 hours: 29, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 3
64% (116 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 139
Wagner David G
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 2, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 2, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
16% (15 of 92) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 140
Lawrence John W
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 27, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 27, Not Interesting: 17, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 32, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 14, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 12, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
36% (49 of 136) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 141
Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 107, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 19, Just right: 99, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 92, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 76, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 106, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 48, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 47 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 47, Interesting: 57, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 11 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 104, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 106, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 61, Helpful: 61, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 64, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 16 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 63, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 24, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 86, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 100, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 3 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 12, 3-6 hours: 81, 7-10 hours: 28, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
70% (126 of 179) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 142
Dupont Edward
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 78, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 96, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 73, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 56, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 74, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 47, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 36 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 37, Interesting: 59, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 80, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 92, 75-90%: 14, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 53, Helpful: 53, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 39, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 19, No opinion: 10 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 39, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 20, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 85, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 84, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 71, 7-10 hours: 22, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 0
61% (110 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 143
Wagner David G
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 1, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 3, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 14, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
25% (24 of 96) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 007 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 144
Resch Janelle
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 19, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
80% (28 of 35) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH136 Section 008 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 145
Webster Ashley Laura
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 18, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 11, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 4, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
54% (27 of 50) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH137 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 146
Sweeney Vincent Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 18, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 16, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 19, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 23, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 21, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
35% (38 of 109) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH137 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 147
Webster Ashley Laura
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 24, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 22, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 22, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 35, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 1, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 27, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 19, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
33% (43 of 129) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 148
Miller Killian
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 42, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 23, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 41, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 34, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 37, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 22, Most of the time: 21, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 29 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 50, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 32, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 66, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 36, No opinion: 11 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 4, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 49, 7-10 hours: 23, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
53% (81 of 154) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 149
Popov Alexey
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 19, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 30, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 17, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 21, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 27, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
35% (39 of 113) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 150
Speziale Sean
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 66, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 25, Just right: 73, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 66, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 52, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 61, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 32, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 49 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 29, Interesting: 63, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 63, Good: 41, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 102, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 67, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 52, No opinion: 9 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 22, No text required: 2, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 41, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 28, Okay: 76, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 58, 7-10 hours: 38, 11-15 hours: 8, > 15 hours: 1
63% (113 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 004 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 151
Park Doug
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 78, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 74, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 53, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 75, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 61, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 27, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 37 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 49, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 76, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 84, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 53, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 38, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 48, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 1, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 10, Somewhat too much: 32, Okay: 50, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 62, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 55, 7-10 hours: 27, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1
52% (94 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 005 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 152
Purbhoo Kevin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 13, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 19, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 15, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 6 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 20, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 11 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 4
34% (61 of 180) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 006 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 153
Chang Dong Eui
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 39, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 33, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 18, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 51, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 34, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
37% (55 of 148) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 007 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 154
Scott Matthew
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 25, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 16, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 22, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 21, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 25, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 16, No opinion: 5 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 0, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
76% (31 of 41) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 008 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 155
Vinette Francine
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 2, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 1, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
65% (26 of 40) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 009 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 156
Speziale Sean
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 43, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 18, Just right: 46, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 40, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 37, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 37, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 19, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 33 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 39, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 40, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 13 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 3, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 19, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2
59% (70 of 119) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH138 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 157
New Stephen
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 0, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 2, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 5, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
23% (9 of 40) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH146 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 158
Karigiannis Spiro
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 29 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 31, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 10, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 47, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 18, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2
73% (51 of 70) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH148 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 159
Hare Kathryn E
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 43, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 35, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 34, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 41, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 26, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 34, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 43, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 44, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 38, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 11, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 23, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1
78% (47 of 60) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH207 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 160
Miller Killian
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 5, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 6, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
50% (9 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH228 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 161
Geshnizjani Ghazal
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 1, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 2, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 2, Good: 0, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 0, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 4, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 3, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
35% (6 of 17) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH235 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 162
Elgun Elcim
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 8, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 13, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
27% (17 of 62) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH235 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 163
Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 50, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 46, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 42, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 30, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 48, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 30, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 15 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 51, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 52, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 11, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 46, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
69% (61 of 89) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH235 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 164
Vicente Colmenares Alejandra
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 12, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 4, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
35% (15 of 43) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH237 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 165
Alwan Mohamad S.
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 4, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 4, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 7, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
50% (10 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH237 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 166
West Joseph John
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 29, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 25, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 28, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 28, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 16, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 33, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
59% (37 of 63) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH237 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 167
Kakariadis Evgenios
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 23, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 18, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 23, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 21, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 12, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 26, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
51% (40 of 79) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH239 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 168
Guenin Bertrand
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 31, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 31, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 30, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 19, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 47 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 33, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 62, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 12, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 11 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 43, No opinion: 15 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 25, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 3
76% (71 of 93) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH239 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 169
Haxell Penny E.
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 38, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 21, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 34, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 26, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 34, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 40 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 22, Interesting: 32, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 37, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 39, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 18, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 43, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 20, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 2
71% (67 of 94) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH239 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 170
Katz Eric
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 17, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 25, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 21, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 6, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 22, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 23, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 23, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2
51% (44 of 87) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH247 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 171
Siegel David
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 9, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 2, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0
52% (11 of 21) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MATH249 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 172
Purbhoo Kevin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 13, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
89% (16 of 18) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
MTHEL131 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 173
Lennox William Scott
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 13, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 42, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 13, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 3, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 19, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 54, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 44, No opinion: 3 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 1, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 1, No opinion: 21 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 28, 3-6 hours: 21, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
32% (58 of 184) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH336 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 174
Willard Ross D
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 26, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 28, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 24, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 19 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 29, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 9, No opinion: 11 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 26, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
83% (30 of 36) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH340 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 175
Rubinstein Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 32, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 18, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 2, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 33 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 39, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 14, No printed course notes: 21, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 21, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 41, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 28, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1
64% (54 of 84) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH346 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 176
Willard Ross D
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 16, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 19, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 16, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 9, No opinion: 8 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
68% (25 of 37) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH352 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 177
Rubinstein Michael
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 16, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 10, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
88% (29 of 33) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH365/PMATH399 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 178
Karigiannis Spiro
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 21, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 16, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 32, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 6, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 6, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 10, > 15 hours: 9
64% (36 of 56) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH441/PMATH641 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 179
Stewart Cameron L
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 18, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 16, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 20, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 12 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 15, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 25, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 25, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
79% (26 of 33) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH450/PMATH650 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 180
Elgun Elcim
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 19, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 20, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 11 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 14, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 20, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 31, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 22, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 27, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 1
57% (31 of 54) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
PMATH467/PMATH667 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 181
Smith Aaron
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 3, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 3, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
50% (10 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT202 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 182
Dawoud Dina
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 79, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 90, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 69, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 80, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 74, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 26, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 64 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 55, Not Interesting: 39, No opinion: 8 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 77, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 76, 75-90%: 32, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 32, Helpful: 67, Not helpful: 14, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 70, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 29, Not helpful: 44, No text required: 4, No opinion: 26 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 96, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 102, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 45, 3-6 hours: 63, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
33% (116 of 356) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT211 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 183
Konda Sreenivas
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 14, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 40, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 69, Somewhat too low: 28, Too low: 10, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 31, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 39, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 18, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 39, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 42, Unsatisfactory: 17, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 2 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 24, Most of the time: 27, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 9, Never: 3, I did not seek help: 32 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 48, No opinion: 16 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 42, Unsatisfactory: 14, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 91, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 78, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 37, Helpful: 52, Not helpful: 12, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 48, No text required: 4, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 71, Somewhat too little: 20, Too little: 10, No opinion: 5 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 92, Somewhat too little: 10, Too little: 4, No opinion: 4 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 68, 3-6 hours: 44, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
40% (118 of 298) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT220 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 184
Singer Basil Karim
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 0, Just right: 9, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 8, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 8, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 0, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
45% (10 of 22) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT221 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 185
Fahmy Hany
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 12, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 14, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 16, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 4, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
71% (20 of 28) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT230 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 186
Zhu Mu
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 57, Good: 44, Satisfactory: 33, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 16, Somewhat too high: 44, Just right: 71, Somewhat too low: 10, Too low: 4, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 47, Good: 49, Satisfactory: 33, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 10 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 57, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 34, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 49, Good: 58, Satisfactory: 27, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 28, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 26, Not often enough: 15, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 61 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 28, Interesting: 68, Not Interesting: 33, No opinion: 12 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 55, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 38, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 112, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 8, 25-50%: 4, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 52, Not helpful: 48, No work assigned: 19, No opinion: 7 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 62, Not helpful: 14, No printed course notes: 27, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 50, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 40, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 33, Okay: 84, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 2, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 82, Somewhat too little: 18, Too little: 20, No opinion: 12 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 56, 3-6 hours: 62, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 2
42% (145 of 344) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT230 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 187
Ali Javid
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 14, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 4, No opinion: 1 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
46% (16 of 35) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT231 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 188
McLeish Donald L
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 26, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 34, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 39, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 26, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 34, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 17, Not often enough: 7, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 50 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 48, No opinion: 7 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 30, Good: 41, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 60, 75-90%: 32, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 58, No work assigned: 2, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 22, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 22, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 53, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 13, Somewhat too much: 22, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 70, Somewhat too little: 13, Too little: 7, No opinion: 4 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 32, 3-6 hours: 48, 7-10 hours: 17, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
33% (103 of 315) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT231 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 189
Struthers Cyntha
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 20, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 21, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 12, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 21, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 9, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 21, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 17, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 2 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 12, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 18, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 11, 3-6 hours: 17, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
92% (35 of 38) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT231 Section 003 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 190
McLeish Donald L
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 8, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 7, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 15, Not Interesting: 8, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 2, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 10, No opinion: 3 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
25% (27 of 110) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT231 Section 051 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 191
Ali Javid
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 5, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 2, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 5, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 5, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0
31% (11 of 35) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT241 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 192
Zhu Mu
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 11, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 14, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 8, Not Interesting: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 8, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
85% (17 of 20) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT316 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 193
Robinson Jack
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 30, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 16, Just right: 49, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 40, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 27, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 36, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 46, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 43, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 60, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 35, Helpful: 30, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 22, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 24, Okay: 32, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 32, 7-10 hours: 28, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 0
68% (67 of 99) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT321 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 194
Balka Peter
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 14, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 4, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 21, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 13, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 3 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 10, No text required: 4, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 6, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
64% (30 of 47) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT330 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 195
Yi Grace Yun
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 22, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 13, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 20, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 2, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 5, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 39, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 26, No opinion: 9 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
74% (54 of 73) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT330 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 196
Konda Sreenu
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 10, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 22, Somewhat too low: 8, Too low: 6, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 18 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 24, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 2
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 42, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 15, No printed course notes: 25, No opinion: 4 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 13, No text required: 14, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 35, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 2, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 38, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
44% (52 of 117) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT331/SYDE334 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 197
Balka Peter
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 21, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 45, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 22, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 21, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 24, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 10, Not often enough: 8, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 16, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 22, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 50, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 39, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 41, No opinion: 6 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 8, No text required: 10, No opinion: 13 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 43, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 48, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 37, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
58% (66 of 114) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT333 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 198
Lysy Martin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 10, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 12, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 4, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 1, No opinion: 0 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 10, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 1
43% (22 of 51) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT333 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 199
Lysy Martin
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 12, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 15, Somewhat too high: 28, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 2, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 22, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 23, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 22, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 25, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 13, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 47, 75-90%: 15, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 18, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 37, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 21, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 15, Somewhat too much: 30, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 11, Somewhat too much: 24, Okay: 30, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 8, 3-6 hours: 36, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 4
54% (69 of 128) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT340 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 200
Metzger Riley Adam
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 45, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 60, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 39, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 36, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 41, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 17, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 18, Not often enough: 4, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 5 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 39, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 12, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 20, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 11, No printed course notes: 10, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 30, No opinion: 19 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 56, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 50, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 21, 3-6 hours: 42, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
53% (71 of 133) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT340 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 201
Molkaraie Mehdi
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 13, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 35, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 12, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 9, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 8, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 9, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 3, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 21 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 12, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 20, Not helpful: 14, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 16, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 5, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 22, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
35% (43 of 124) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT371 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 202
Fahmy Hany
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 50, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 36, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 45, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 44, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 33, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 30, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 48, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 50, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 47, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 21, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 7 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0
83% (60 of 72) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT372 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 203
Konda Sreenivas
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 10, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 46, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 10, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 6, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 5, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 14, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 9, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 3, Interesting: 36, Not Interesting: 18, No opinion: 4 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 6, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 36, 75-90%: 16, 50-75%: 10, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 2
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 9, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 31, Not helpful: 22, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 35, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 50, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 61, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 22, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
65% (64 of 98) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT431 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 204
Liang Kun
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 9, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 33, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 3, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 13, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 5, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 7, Most of the time: 8, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 8, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 38, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 32, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 45, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
51% (49 of 97) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
Course Evaluations
Page 205
Molkaraie Mehdi
STAT440/STAT840/CM761 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 5, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 23, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 15, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 7, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 15, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 7 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 21, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 15, No opinion: 6 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 21, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 18, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
104% (29 of 28) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT443 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 206
Ramezan Reza
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 24, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 10, Just right: 34, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 38, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 24, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 28, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 16, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 3 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 28, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 31, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 19, No opinion: 13 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 40, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 10, 3-6 hours: 30, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 3
58% (49 of 84) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT443 Section 002 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 207
Ramezan Reza
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 34, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 56, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 54, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 28, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 43, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 32, Most of the time: 15, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 18, Interesting: 44, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 44, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 62, 75-90%: 7, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 47, No opinion: 2 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 40, No opinion: 10 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 54, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 62, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 13, 3-6 hours: 46, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0
83% (71 of 86) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
Course Evaluations
Page 208
Chenouri Shojaeddin
STAT444/STAT844/CM764 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 8, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 11, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 9, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 11, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 13, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 20, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 8, No opinion: 1 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1
44% (31 of 70) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT450/STAT850 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 209
Wu Changbao
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 49, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 12, Somewhat too high: 14, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 33, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 8 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 40, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 38, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 23, Most of the time: 17, Often enough: 20, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 22 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 19, Interesting: 46, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 48, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 67, 75-90%: 10, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 1
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 51, No opinion: 8 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 44, No opinion: 14 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 23, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 62, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 15, 3-6 hours: 45, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 3
70% (83 of 119) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
STAT454/STAT854 Section 001 Characteristics of the Instructor
1)
Course Evaluations
Page 210
Boudreau Christian
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures: Excellent: 18, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 At what level were the instructors explanations aimed? Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 11, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1 Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions: Excellent: 17, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.) Excellent: 20, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0 Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation: Excellent: 17, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0 Was the instructor available for help outside class? Always: 13, Most of the time: 14, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9 Did you nd the course interesting? Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 29, Not Interesting: 6, No opinion: 2 Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher: Excellent: 15, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Characteristics of the Course
9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course? 90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 5, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0
10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0 11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 12, No opinion: 0 12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content? Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 29, No opinion: 5 13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material? Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0 14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate? Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 28, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0 15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures? 0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 34, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1
68% (46 of 68) of students answered some questions.
Winter 2013
Course Evaluations
Index by Course
Page 211
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Instructor Mackay Anne Bernard Carole Adcock James Cui Zhenyu Matheson Brenton James Bernard Carole Wood Peter J Cai Jun Wang Ruodu Johnston Ricky Mark Lennox William Scott Hewitt Conrad G Ivan Lucian West Joseph John Krivodonova Lilia Moshksar Kamyar De Sterck Hans Harmsworth David L Hewitt Conrad G Waite Michael L. Miskovic Zoran Vrscay Edward R Siegel David Chang Dong Eui Girelli Florian Roh Patrick Young Koenemann Jochen Georgiou Konstantinos New Stephen Roh Patrick Young Jao David Wolkowicz Henry Swamy Chaitanya Georgiou Konstantinos Godsil Christopher D Guenin Bertrand Mosca Michele Jao David Sproule Robert J Sproule Robert J Blake William Peter Thomas Arnason Mark Matheson Brenton James Liu Zhiyong Michael Fourquet Elodie Cecile Diane Sakhnini Victoria Sakhnini Victoria Graham Sandra Lynn Shaikh Maheen Vasiga Troy Michael John Kharal Rosina Case Lori Shaikh Maheen Kharal Rosina
Course ACTSC231 Section 001 ACTSC231 Section 051 ACTSC232 Section 001 ACTSC331 Section 001 ACTSC371 Section 001 ACTSC371 Section 051 ACTSC372 Section 001 ACTSC433/ACTSC833 Section 001 ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001 ACTSC453/ACTSC853 Section 001 ACTSC462/ACTSC862 Section 001 AMATH231 Section 001 AMATH242/CS371 Section 001 AMATH250 Section 001 AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 001 AMATH332/PMATH332 Section 001 AMATH342 Section 001 AMATH350 Section 001 AMATH353 Section 001 AMATH361 Section 001 AMATH373 Section 001 AMATH391 Section 001 AMATH451 Section 001 AMATH455/AMATH655 Section 001 AMATH475/AMATH675/PHYS476 Section 001 CO227 Section 001 CO250 Section 001 CO250 Section 002 CO250 Section 051 CO327 Section 001 CO331 Section 001 CO367 Section 001 CO370 Section 001 CO372 Section 001 CO444/CO644 Section 001 CO452/CO652 Section 001 CO481/CS467/PHYS467 Section 001 CO487/CO687 Section 001 COMM101 Section 051 COMM102 Section 051 COMM321 Section 001 COMM400 Section 001 COMM421 Section 001 COMM432 Section 001 CS115 Section 001 CS115 Section 002 CS115 Section 003 CS115 Section 004 CS116 Section 001 CS116 Section 002 CS116 Section 003 CS116 Section 004 CS116 Section 005 CS116 Section 006
Winter 2013
55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 Vasiga Troy Michael John Dean-Hall Adriel Case Lori Champaign John Ashkan Azin Salinger Alejandro Petrick Mark Lushman Bradley Michael Petrick Mark Tompkins Dave Harji Ashif S Godfrey Michael Ragde Prabhakar Graham Sandra Lynn Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro Cormack Gordon V Cormack Gordon V Ben-David Shai Holt Richard Ivkovic Igor Ivkovic Igor Ataullah Ahmed Ayaz Forsyth Peter Champaign John Chan Timothy Chan Timothy Truszkowski Jakub Michal Wong Bernard Aboulnaga Ashraf Lank Edward Lank Edward Brecht Timothy Brecht Timothy Watrous John Shallit Jeffrey O Li Yu Ying Safayeni Suzanne Safayeni Suzanne Limam Noura Lushman Bradley Michael Lhotak Ondrej Treer Richard Holmes Reid Thomas Morton Andrew Cowan William B Daudjee Khuzaima Daudjee Khuzaima Limam Noura Hengartner Urs Hengartner Urs Shallit Jeffrey O Wan Justin Li Yu Ying Burkowski Forbes Mann Richard
Course Evaluations
CS116 Section 007 CS116 Section 008 CS116 Section 009 CS135 Section 001 CS135 Section 002 CS136 Section 001 CS136 Section 002 CS136 Section 003 CS136 Section 004 CS136 Section 005 CS136 Section 006 CS138 Section 001 CS146 Section 001 CS230 Section 001 CS240 Section 001 CS240 Section 002 CS241 Section 001 CS241 Section 002 CS245 Section 001 CS246 Section 001 CS251 Section 001 CS251 Section 002 CS330 Section 001 CS335 Section 001 CS338 Section 001 CS341 Section 001 CS341 Section 002 CS341 Section 003 CS343 Section 001 CS348 Section 001 CS349 Section 001 CS349 Section 002 CS350 Section 001 CS350 Section 002 CS360 Section 001 CS365 Section 001 CS370 Section 001 CS430 Section 001 CS432 Section 001 CS436 Section 001 CS442/CS642 Section 001 CS444/CS644 Section 001 CS445/CS645/ECE451 Section 001 CS446/CS646/ECE452 Section 001 CS450/CS650 Section 001 CS452/CS652 Section 001 CS454/CS654 Section 001 CS454/CS654 Section 002 CS456/CS656 Section 001 CS458/CS658 Section 001 CS458/CS658 Section 002 CS462/CS662 Section 001 CS475/CS675 Section 001 CS476/CS676 Section 001 CS483/CS683 Section 001 CS484/CS684 Section 001
Page 212
Winter 2013
111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 Ben-David Shai Hoey Jesse Storjohann Arne Mann Stephen Tompkins Dave Cohen Robin Freeland R Keith Wood Peter J Freeland R Keith Ali Akbari Shahla Celmins Uldis Alfred Beltaos Andrew Beltaos Andrew Ng Wai Man Sweeney Vincent Michael Loo Clinton Smith Paula T. Loo Clinton Ivan Lucian Smith Paula T. Chan Kai Cheong Akash Mukto Moshksar Kamyar Pei Martin Brydon Dale Akash Mukto Pretti John-Paul C Dupont Edward Wagner David G Lawrence John W Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry Dupont Edward Wagner David G Resch Janelle Webster Ashley Laura Sweeney Vincent Michael Webster Ashley Laura Miller Killian Popov Alexey Speziale Sean Park Doug Purbhoo Kevin Chang Dong Eui Scott Matthew Vinette Francine Speziale Sean New Stephen Karigiannis Spiro Hare Kathryn E Miller Killian Geshnizjani Ghazal Elgun Elcim Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry Vicente Colmenares Alejandra Alwan Mohamad S. West Joseph John
Course Evaluations
CS485/CS685 Section 001 CS486/CS686 Section 001 CS487/CS687/CM730 Section 001 CS488/CS688 Section 001 CS490 Section 001 CS492/CS692 Section 001 MATBUS470 Section 001 MATBUS471 Section 001 MATBUS472 Section 001 MATH104 Section 001 MATH106 Section 001 MATH127 Section 001 MATH127 Section 002 MATH127 Section 003 MATH128 Section 001 MATH128 Section 002 MATH128 Section 003 MATH128 Section 004 MATH128 Section 005 MATH128 Section 006 MATH135 Section 001 MATH135 Section 002 MATH135 Section 003 MATH135 Section 004 MATH135 Section 005 MATH135 Section 006 MATH135 Section 051 MATH136 Section 001 MATH136 Section 002 MATH136 Section 003 MATH136 Section 004 MATH136 Section 005 MATH136 Section 006 MATH136 Section 007 MATH136 Section 008 MATH137 Section 001 MATH137 Section 002 MATH138 Section 001 MATH138 Section 002 MATH138 Section 003 MATH138 Section 004 MATH138 Section 005 MATH138 Section 006 MATH138 Section 007 MATH138 Section 008 MATH138 Section 009 MATH138 Section 051 MATH146 Section 001 MATH148 Section 001 MATH207 Section 001 MATH228 Section 001 MATH235 Section 001 MATH235 Section 002 MATH235 Section 003 MATH237 Section 001 MATH237 Section 002
Page 213
Winter 2013
167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 Kakariadis Evgenios Guenin Bertrand Haxell Penny E. Katz Eric Siegel David Purbhoo Kevin Lennox William Scott Willard Ross D Rubinstein Michael Willard Ross D Rubinstein Michael Karigiannis Spiro Stewart Cameron L Elgun Elcim Smith Aaron Dawoud Dina Konda Sreenivas Singer Basil Karim Fahmy Hany Zhu Mu Ali Javid McLeish Donald L Struthers Cyntha McLeish Donald L Ali Javid Zhu Mu Robinson Jack Balka Peter Yi Grace Yun Konda Sreenu Balka Peter Lysy Martin Lysy Martin Metzger Riley Adam Molkaraie Mehdi Fahmy Hany Konda Sreenivas Liang Kun Molkaraie Mehdi Ramezan Reza Ramezan Reza Chenouri Shojaeddin Wu Changbao Boudreau Christian
Course Evaluations
MATH237 Section 003 MATH239 Section 001 MATH239 Section 002 MATH239 Section 003 MATH247 Section 001 MATH249 Section 001 MTHEL131 Section 001 PMATH336 Section 001 PMATH340 Section 001 PMATH346 Section 001 PMATH352 Section 001 PMATH365/PMATH399 Section 001 PMATH441/PMATH641 Section 001 PMATH450/PMATH650 Section 001 PMATH467/PMATH667 Section 001 STAT202 Section 001 STAT211 Section 001 STAT220 Section 001 STAT221 Section 001 STAT230 Section 001 STAT230 Section 051 STAT231 Section 001 STAT231 Section 002 STAT231 Section 003 STAT231 Section 051 STAT241 Section 001 STAT316 Section 001 STAT321 Section 001 STAT330 Section 001 STAT330 Section 002 STAT331/SYDE334 Section 001 STAT333 Section 001 STAT333 Section 002 STAT340 Section 001 STAT340 Section 002 STAT371 Section 001 STAT372 Section 001 STAT431 Section 001 STAT440/STAT840/CM761 Section 001 STAT443 Section 001 STAT443 Section 002 STAT444/STAT844/CM764 Section 001 STAT450/STAT850 Section 001 STAT454/STAT854 Section 001
Page 214
Winter 2013
Course Evaluations
Index by Instructor
Page 215
Page 84 3 132 136 120 191 187 165 42 59 77 197 194 123 122 111 73 6 2 41 210 87 88 135 109 8 57 52 121 58 79 131 81 80 24 153 208 116 72 71 100 4 101 102 182 17 56 138 142 180 162 202 185 78
Instructor Aboulnaga Ashraf Adcock James Akash Mukto Akash Mukto Ali Akbari Shahla Ali Javid Ali Javid Alwan Mohamad S. Arnason Mark Ashkan Azin Ataullah Ahmed Ayaz Balka Peter Balka Peter Beltaos Andrew Beltaos Andrew Ben-David Shai Ben-David Shai Bernard Carole Bernard Carole Blake William Peter Thomas Boudreau Christian Brecht Timothy Brecht Timothy Brydon Dale Burkowski Forbes Cai Jun Case Lori Case Lori Celmins Uldis Alfred Champaign John Champaign John Chan Kai Cheong Chan Timothy Chan Timothy Chang Dong Eui Chang Dong Eui Chenouri Shojaeddin Cohen Robin Cormack Gordon V Cormack Gordon V Cowan William B Cui Zhenyu Daudjee Khuzaima Daudjee Khuzaima Dawoud Dina De Sterck Hans Dean-Hall Adriel Dupont Edward Dupont Edward Elgun Elcim Elgun Elcim Fahmy Hany Fahmy Hany Forsyth Peter
Course CS348 Section 001 ACTSC232 Section 001 MATH135 Section 002 MATH135 Section 006 MATH104 Section 001 STAT231 Section 051 STAT230 Section 051 MATH237 Section 001 COMM400 Section 001 CS135 Section 002 CS330 Section 001 STAT331/SYDE334 Section 001 STAT321 Section 001 MATH127 Section 002 MATH127 Section 001 CS485/CS685 Section 001 CS245 Section 001 ACTSC371 Section 051 ACTSC231 Section 051 COMM321 Section 001 STAT454/STAT854 Section 001 CS350 Section 001 CS350 Section 002 MATH135 Section 005 CS483/CS683 Section 001 ACTSC433/ACTSC833 Section 001 CS116 Section 009 CS116 Section 004 MATH106 Section 001 CS135 Section 001 CS338 Section 001 MATH135 Section 001 CS341 Section 002 CS341 Section 001 AMATH455/AMATH655 Section 001 MATH138 Section 006 STAT444/STAT844/CM764 Section 001 CS492/CS692 Section 001 CS241 Section 002 CS241 Section 001 CS452/CS652 Section 001 ACTSC331 Section 001 CS454/CS654 Section 001 CS454/CS654 Section 002 STAT202 Section 001 AMATH342 Section 001 CS116 Section 008 MATH136 Section 001 MATH136 Section 005 PMATH450/PMATH650 Section 001 MATH235 Section 001 STAT371 Section 001 STAT221 Section 001 CS335 Section 001
Winter 2013
45 117 119 28 34 161 25 66 35 68 48 168 36 159 65 18 169 105 104 12 19 112 98 74 13 129 75 76 31 38 10 167 158 178 170 54 51 27 183 203 196 15 86 85 140 11 173 96 91 108 204 94 103 44 128 126 Fourquet Elodie Cecile Diane Freeland R Keith Freeland R Keith Georgiou Konstantinos Georgiou Konstantinos Geshnizjani Ghazal Girelli Florian Godfrey Michael Godsil Christopher D Graham Sandra Lynn Graham Sandra Lynn Guenin Bertrand Guenin Bertrand Hare Kathryn E Harji Ashif S Harmsworth David L Haxell Penny E. Hengartner Urs Hengartner Urs Hewitt Conrad G Hewitt Conrad G Hoey Jesse Holmes Reid Thomas Holt Richard Ivan Lucian Ivan Lucian Ivkovic Igor Ivkovic Igor Jao David Jao David Johnston Ricky Mark Kakariadis Evgenios Karigiannis Spiro Karigiannis Spiro Katz Eric Kharal Rosina Kharal Rosina Koenemann Jochen Konda Sreenivas Konda Sreenivas Konda Sreenu Krivodonova Lilia Lank Edward Lank Edward Lawrence John W Lennox William Scott Lennox William Scott Lhotak Ondrej Li Yu Ying Li Yu Ying Liang Kun Limam Noura Limam Noura Liu Zhiyong Michael Loo Clinton Loo Clinton
Course Evaluations
CS115 Section 001 MATBUS470 Section 001 MATBUS472 Section 001 CO250 Section 002 CO372 Section 001 MATH228 Section 001 AMATH475/AMATH675/PHYS476 Section 001 CS138 Section 001 CO444/CO644 Section 001 CS230 Section 001 CS115 Section 004 MATH239 Section 001 CO452/CO652 Section 001 MATH148 Section 001 CS136 Section 006 AMATH350 Section 001 MATH239 Section 002 CS458/CS658 Section 002 CS458/CS658 Section 001 AMATH231 Section 001 AMATH353 Section 001 CS486/CS686 Section 001 CS446/CS646/ECE452 Section 001 CS246 Section 001 AMATH242/CS371 Section 001 MATH128 Section 005 CS251 Section 001 CS251 Section 002 CO331 Section 001 CO487/CO687 Section 001 ACTSC453/ACTSC853 Section 001 MATH237 Section 003 MATH146 Section 001 PMATH365/PMATH399 Section 001 MATH239 Section 003 CS116 Section 006 CS116 Section 003 CO250 Section 001 STAT211 Section 001 STAT372 Section 001 STAT330 Section 002 AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 001 CS349 Section 002 CS349 Section 001 MATH136 Section 003 ACTSC462/ACTSC862 Section 001 MTHEL131 Section 001 CS444/CS644 Section 001 CS370 Section 001 CS476/CS676 Section 001 STAT431 Section 001 CS436 Section 001 CS456/CS656 Section 001 COMM432 Section 001 MATH128 Section 004 MATH128 Section 002
Page 216
Winter 2013
69 70 95 62 199 198 1 110 114 5 43 190 188 200 148 160 21 205 201 99 37 16 133 157 29 124 151 134 61 63 149 137 172 152 67 206 207 144 193 26 30 175 177 92 93 47 46 60 154 49 53 106 90 171 23 184 Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz Alejandro Lushman Bradley Michael Lushman Bradley Michael Lysy Martin Lysy Martin Mackay Anne Mann Richard Mann Stephen Matheson Brenton James Matheson Brenton James McLeish Donald L McLeish Donald L Metzger Riley Adam Miller Killian Miller Killian Miskovic Zoran Molkaraie Mehdi Molkaraie Mehdi Morton Andrew Mosca Michele Moshksar Kamyar Moshksar Kamyar New Stephen New Stephen Ng Wai Man Park Doug Pei Martin Petrick Mark Petrick Mark Popov Alexey Pretti John-Paul C Purbhoo Kevin Purbhoo Kevin Ragde Prabhakar Ramezan Reza Ramezan Reza Resch Janelle Robinson Jack Roh Patrick Young Roh Patrick Young Rubinstein Michael Rubinstein Michael Safayeni Suzanne Safayeni Suzanne Sakhnini Victoria Sakhnini Victoria Salinger Alejandro Scott Matthew Shaikh Maheen Shaikh Maheen Shallit Jeffrey O Shallit Jeffrey O Siegel David Siegel David Singer Basil Karim
Course Evaluations
CS240 Section 001 CS240 Section 002 CS442/CS642 Section 001 CS136 Section 003 STAT333 Section 002 STAT333 Section 001 ACTSC231 Section 001 CS484/CS684 Section 001 CS488/CS688 Section 001 ACTSC371 Section 001 COMM421 Section 001 STAT231 Section 003 STAT231 Section 001 STAT340 Section 001 MATH138 Section 001 MATH207 Section 001 AMATH373 Section 001 STAT440/STAT840/CM761 Section 001 STAT340 Section 002 CS450/CS650 Section 001 CO481/CS467/PHYS467 Section 001 AMATH332/PMATH332 Section 001 MATH135 Section 003 MATH138 Section 051 CO250 Section 051 MATH127 Section 003 MATH138 Section 004 MATH135 Section 004 CS136 Section 002 CS136 Section 004 MATH138 Section 002 MATH135 Section 051 MATH249 Section 001 MATH138 Section 005 CS146 Section 001 STAT443 Section 001 STAT443 Section 002 MATH136 Section 007 STAT316 Section 001 CO227 Section 001 CO327 Section 001 PMATH340 Section 001 PMATH352 Section 001 CS430 Section 001 CS432 Section 001 CS115 Section 003 CS115 Section 002 CS136 Section 001 MATH138 Section 007 CS116 Section 001 CS116 Section 005 CS462/CS662 Section 001 CS365 Section 001 MATH247 Section 001 AMATH451 Section 001 STAT220 Section 001
Page 217
Winter 2013
181 130 127 150 156 40 39 179 113 189 33 146 125 64 115 97 82 55 50 164 155 22 143 139 20 107 9 89 145 147 166 14 176 174 163 141 32 83 118 7 209 195 186 192 Smith Aaron Smith Paula T. Smith Paula T. Speziale Sean Speziale Sean Sproule Robert J Sproule Robert J Stewart Cameron L Storjohann Arne Struthers Cyntha Swamy Chaitanya Sweeney Vincent Michael Sweeney Vincent Michael Tompkins Dave Tompkins Dave Treer Richard Truszkowski Jakub Michal Vasiga Troy Michael John Vasiga Troy Michael John Vicente Colmenares Alejandra Vinette Francine Vrscay Edward R Wagner David G Wagner David G Waite Michael L. Wan Justin Wang Ruodu Watrous John Webster Ashley Laura Webster Ashley Laura West Joseph John West Joseph John Willard Ross D Willard Ross D Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry Wolczuk Dan Sean Terry Wolkowicz Henry Wong Bernard Wood Peter J Wood Peter J Wu Changbao Yi Grace Yun Zhu Mu Zhu Mu
Course Evaluations
PMATH467/PMATH667 Section 001 MATH128 Section 006 MATH128 Section 003 MATH138 Section 003 MATH138 Section 009 COMM102 Section 051 COMM101 Section 051 PMATH441/PMATH641 Section 001 CS487/CS687/CM730 Section 001 STAT231 Section 002 CO370 Section 001 MATH137 Section 001 MATH128 Section 001 CS136 Section 005 CS490 Section 001 CS445/CS645/ECE451 Section 001 CS341 Section 003 CS116 Section 007 CS116 Section 002 MATH235 Section 003 MATH138 Section 008 AMATH391 Section 001 MATH136 Section 006 MATH136 Section 002 AMATH361 Section 001 CS475/CS675 Section 001 ACTSC446/ACTSC846 Section 001 CS360 Section 001 MATH136 Section 008 MATH137 Section 002 MATH237 Section 002 AMATH250 Section 001 PMATH346 Section 001 PMATH336 Section 001 MATH235 Section 002 MATH136 Section 004 CO367 Section 001 CS343 Section 001 MATBUS471 Section 001 ACTSC372 Section 001 STAT450/STAT850 Section 001 STAT330 Section 001 STAT230 Section 001 STAT241 Section 001
Page 218
Anda mungkin juga menyukai
- UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations For Fall 2011Dokumen241 halamanUW Mathematics Professor Evaluations For Fall 2011DPBelum ada peringkat
- Leadership Skills: Middle School Manual: Violence Prevention ProgramDari EverandLeadership Skills: Middle School Manual: Violence Prevention ProgramBelum ada peringkat
- North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong Student Feedback Form For The Academic YearDokumen3 halamanNorth-Eastern Hill University, Shillong Student Feedback Form For The Academic YearmandhirBelum ada peringkat
- Student Satisfaction SurveyDokumen6 halamanStudent Satisfaction SurveyBeasiswa Untuk KitaBelum ada peringkat
- School Administrator Interview QuestionsDokumen7 halamanSchool Administrator Interview QuestionsAbdul HafifBelum ada peringkat
- 2.7.1 Student Satisfaction Survey 2019 2020 ReportDokumen58 halaman2.7.1 Student Satisfaction Survey 2019 2020 Reportdeshmukhtushar.mBelum ada peringkat
- Questions Asked of Teachers PDFDokumen2 halamanQuestions Asked of Teachers PDFMaria Jobelle Borja Albia100% (1)
- Sample Questionnaires For Feedback From Students Universities Questionnaire No. 1 University XYZDokumen5 halamanSample Questionnaires For Feedback From Students Universities Questionnaire No. 1 University XYZdamarugaBelum ada peringkat
- Deped Interview QuestionsDokumen2 halamanDeped Interview QuestionsJssy May100% (5)
- 421a-8 Fall 2011Dokumen10 halaman421a-8 Fall 2011api-97308101Belum ada peringkat
- Check List Assessment Visit ReportDokumen6 halamanCheck List Assessment Visit ReportKhurram MalikBelum ada peringkat
- Year End Resources - Additional ResourcesDokumen4 halamanYear End Resources - Additional ResourcesDebraj SarkarBelum ada peringkat
- SSS-Questinnaire StudentsDokumen3 halamanSSS-Questinnaire Studentspradeep kumarBelum ada peringkat
- University Instructor Evaluation Template: Exit This SurveyDokumen7 halamanUniversity Instructor Evaluation Template: Exit This SurveyRandy ZarateBelum ada peringkat
- YouthTruth Survey Questions Feedback For TeachersDokumen16 halamanYouthTruth Survey Questions Feedback For Teachersssat commerceBelum ada peringkat
- Interview QuestionsDokumen20 halamanInterview QuestionsMarife R. RoyoBelum ada peringkat
- Ucl Department of Philosophy Lecture Evaluation FormDokumen1 halamanUcl Department of Philosophy Lecture Evaluation FormRusiru Kalpagee ChitrasenaBelum ada peringkat
- Internship Presentation Guidelines: Focused AreasDokumen2 halamanInternship Presentation Guidelines: Focused AreasAfni SelamatBelum ada peringkat
- Nela Evaluation Plan Walkthroughs Laalice Hopkins Northern Nash High SchoolDokumen9 halamanNela Evaluation Plan Walkthroughs Laalice Hopkins Northern Nash High Schoolapi-300252831Belum ada peringkat
- 12 Sessions - Course IntroductionDokumen20 halaman12 Sessions - Course IntroductionGiang VõBelum ada peringkat
- Teacher's Interview QuestionsDokumen13 halamanTeacher's Interview QuestionsGirlie Harical GangawanBelum ada peringkat
- How To Prepare For Ed Tech InterviewsDokumen49 halamanHow To Prepare For Ed Tech Interviewssunil tripathiBelum ada peringkat
- Saisevaluation Summer 2013Dokumen2 halamanSaisevaluation Summer 2013api-254196415Belum ada peringkat
- October DLT Powerpoint Danielson Calibration FinalDokumen32 halamanOctober DLT Powerpoint Danielson Calibration FinalJulian A.Belum ada peringkat
- Teacher & Course Evaluation Form: Optional OptionalDokumen2 halamanTeacher & Course Evaluation Form: Optional OptionalGunjan KhuranaBelum ada peringkat
- Final Socialization Guidelines Practica ViDokumen13 halamanFinal Socialization Guidelines Practica ViAlejandro LandinezBelum ada peringkat
- 100 Teacher Interview QuestionsDokumen5 halaman100 Teacher Interview QuestionsmykerobsmikoBelum ada peringkat
- P I Q - P: Otential Nterview Uestions RincipalDokumen7 halamanP I Q - P: Otential Nterview Uestions Rincipalmm-newbeginnings48Belum ada peringkat
- Interview QuestionsDokumen4 halamanInterview Questionsscribd4anandBelum ada peringkat
- SSS PreparationDokumen16 halamanSSS PreparationrajaBelum ada peringkat
- Midterm Eval QuestionsDokumen4 halamanMidterm Eval QuestionsRabin ShresthaBelum ada peringkat
- Вказівки щодо аналізу уроків для ведення щоденника спостереженняDokumen3 halamanВказівки щодо аналізу уроків для ведення щоденника спостереженняСофія Богданівна КостураBelum ada peringkat
- Workshop EvaluationDokumen2 halamanWorkshop Evaluationapi-283722979Belum ada peringkat
- Folder Organization - Teaching Practicum 2Dokumen2 halamanFolder Organization - Teaching Practicum 2André HgzBelum ada peringkat
- NELA Evaluation Plan Instructional Rounds Effect On InstructionDokumen12 halamanNELA Evaluation Plan Instructional Rounds Effect On Instructionapi-228456002Belum ada peringkat
- ISTE Workshop Writing Effective Conference Papers: Paper Planning TemplateDokumen53 halamanISTE Workshop Writing Effective Conference Papers: Paper Planning Templatepatil_raaj7234Belum ada peringkat
- Student SurveyDokumen5 halamanStudent Surveyranimishra2806Belum ada peringkat
- Trainer EvaluationDokumen3 halamanTrainer EvaluationGeorge WhiteheadBelum ada peringkat
- Shadow A Teacher Who Works in Special EducationDokumen3 halamanShadow A Teacher Who Works in Special Educationapi-634189036Belum ada peringkat
- WDM Interview QuestionsDokumen3 halamanWDM Interview Questionsapi-3844607180% (1)
- FeedbackDokumen2 halamanFeedbackDrakshayaniMurgodBelum ada peringkat
- Feedback Report AnalysisDokumen28 halamanFeedback Report AnalysisSandeep SandyBelum ada peringkat
- Practice Interview Questions For Teachers: Sample Questions That School Administrators May AskDokumen2 halamanPractice Interview Questions For Teachers: Sample Questions That School Administrators May AskYee Jiea PangBelum ada peringkat
- SurveyDokumen10 halamanSurveyRuxandra PleseaBelum ada peringkat
- Feedback Form (Advanced)Dokumen8 halamanFeedback Form (Advanced)Hisham MohammedBelum ada peringkat
- 50 Great Questions For Teacher InterviewsDokumen6 halaman50 Great Questions For Teacher InterviewsEIy SantiasBelum ada peringkat
- QuestionnareDokumen2 halamanQuestionnareMonisha DhanarajBelum ada peringkat
- Common Interview Questions For TeachersDokumen3 halamanCommon Interview Questions For TeachersAileen TamayoBelum ada peringkat
- GraphsDokumen11 halamanGraphsapi-283478708Belum ada peringkat
- TM Lesson Plan Review FormDokumen2 halamanTM Lesson Plan Review FormCCMC [PVT] LTD.Belum ada peringkat
- ISOM 2600: Introduction To Business AnalyticsDokumen2 halamanISOM 2600: Introduction To Business AnalyticsHo Ming ChoBelum ada peringkat
- LessonplanguidelinesDokumen3 halamanLessonplanguidelinesfogleman100% (1)
- Assessing Writing A2 Key For Schools b1 Preliminary For Schools SlidesDokumen64 halamanAssessing Writing A2 Key For Schools b1 Preliminary For Schools SlidesFlash BakerBelum ada peringkat
- Career Teaching InterviewDokumen10 halamanCareer Teaching Interviewmagpie10Belum ada peringkat
- Academic Interview Cheat SheetDokumen5 halamanAcademic Interview Cheat SheetgieckerBelum ada peringkat
- Class Observation Procedures: The Teacher'S AnalysisDokumen5 halamanClass Observation Procedures: The Teacher'S AnalysisHeitor SoaresBelum ada peringkat
- Instructional DesignerDokumen5 halamanInstructional DesignerJoshua RosenbaumBelum ada peringkat
- General Teacher Interview QuestionsDokumen10 halamanGeneral Teacher Interview QuestionsSaif UllahBelum ada peringkat
- MGMT2110 SyllabusDokumen9 halamanMGMT2110 SyllabusSanjana ManikandanBelum ada peringkat
- Reading A Film Reading A Film: How Do You Analyze A Film Beyond Its Plot?Dokumen6 halamanReading A Film Reading A Film: How Do You Analyze A Film Beyond Its Plot?DPBelum ada peringkat
- 1.1 Notes PDFDokumen1 halaman1.1 Notes PDFDPBelum ada peringkat
- New World Encounters: America: Past and PresentDokumen38 halamanNew World Encounters: America: Past and PresentDP100% (1)
- Jorie R Goldsmith: Age 32, Born in March 1984 2167 Farnsworth LN, Northbrook, IL 60062Dokumen3 halamanJorie R Goldsmith: Age 32, Born in March 1984 2167 Farnsworth LN, Northbrook, IL 60062DPBelum ada peringkat
- Section - The U-Substitution: Example 1Dokumen7 halamanSection - The U-Substitution: Example 1DPBelum ada peringkat
- Math 115 Lab 4 SolutionsDokumen3 halamanMath 115 Lab 4 SolutionsDPBelum ada peringkat
- Math 115 Lab 7 SolutionsDokumen3 halamanMath 115 Lab 7 SolutionsDPBelum ada peringkat
- Math 115 Lab 1 SolutionsDokumen2 halamanMath 115 Lab 1 SolutionsDPBelum ada peringkat
- Lab 3 SolnsDokumen3 halamanLab 3 SolnsDPBelum ada peringkat
- Math 115 Lab 6 SolutionsDokumen3 halamanMath 115 Lab 6 SolutionsDPBelum ada peringkat
- Week 12 PDFDokumen8 halamanWeek 12 PDFDPBelum ada peringkat
- Lab 2 SolnsDokumen5 halamanLab 2 SolnsDPBelum ada peringkat
- STR CON DEX INT WIS CHA: Initiative Initiative Defenses AC Movement SpeedDokumen4 halamanSTR CON DEX INT WIS CHA: Initiative Initiative Defenses AC Movement SpeedDPBelum ada peringkat
- Week 10 PDFDokumen8 halamanWeek 10 PDFDPBelum ada peringkat
- Week 8: 5.2 Independence & DimensionDokumen11 halamanWeek 8: 5.2 Independence & DimensionDPBelum ada peringkat
- Week 7: 4.4 Matrix Transformations IIDokumen9 halamanWeek 7: 4.4 Matrix Transformations IIDPBelum ada peringkat
- Asian History Month 2013 Student WorkshopsDokumen11 halamanAsian History Month 2013 Student WorkshopsDPBelum ada peringkat
- LSO Live - Handel's Messiah Digital Album BookletDokumen20 halamanLSO Live - Handel's Messiah Digital Album BookletDPBelum ada peringkat
- Bae Case StudyDokumen7 halamanBae Case Studyسارة الهاشمي100% (3)
- Act Reading SkillsDokumen11 halamanAct Reading SkillsSayed MikoBelum ada peringkat
- Makerspace Choice Board - 0Dokumen4 halamanMakerspace Choice Board - 0Kourtney MitchellBelum ada peringkat
- Silabus: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa InggrisDokumen3 halamanSilabus: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa InggrisRusdin SurflakeyBelum ada peringkat
- Avatar and IepDokumen7 halamanAvatar and Iepapi-249199136Belum ada peringkat
- Q1 - Performance Task No. 1Dokumen1 halamanQ1 - Performance Task No. 1keanguidesBelum ada peringkat
- Birnie Smith2016Dokumen20 halamanBirnie Smith2016Nicholas TumbasBelum ada peringkat
- Confrontation MeetingDokumen5 halamanConfrontation MeetingcalligullaBelum ada peringkat
- Sagot Sa What's More NG Oral ComDokumen2 halamanSagot Sa What's More NG Oral ComMhariane MabborangBelum ada peringkat
- Assignment English Sem 1Dokumen13 halamanAssignment English Sem 1Lacksumiy MurthyBelum ada peringkat
- Summary of PsycholinguisticsDokumen3 halamanSummary of PsycholinguisticsYanuariusAlfandoDjawa100% (1)
- Presentation of DataDokumen9 halamanPresentation of DataMikaella ManzanoBelum ada peringkat
- ETFO Internal Memo On New CurriculumDokumen2 halamanETFO Internal Memo On New CurriculumCityNewsTorontoBelum ada peringkat
- SOP For Admission in Foreign UniversityDokumen2 halamanSOP For Admission in Foreign UniversityYashraj SinghBelum ada peringkat
- Guidelines To Design An Online Meeting With ExamplesDokumen6 halamanGuidelines To Design An Online Meeting With ExamplesKatherin Meza BenitezBelum ada peringkat
- Versión Corta Del Test de BostonDokumen4 halamanVersión Corta Del Test de BostonmsexpositoBelum ada peringkat
- Writing Negative Messages: Chapter 9 - 1Dokumen29 halamanWriting Negative Messages: Chapter 9 - 1Arijit DasBelum ada peringkat
- Kristine Jane T. Zipagan Assignment: 1. Parts of InfographicsDokumen2 halamanKristine Jane T. Zipagan Assignment: 1. Parts of InfographicsChristyBelum ada peringkat
- A Case Study On A Student of Class Vii, Who Lacks Motivation and InterestDokumen18 halamanA Case Study On A Student of Class Vii, Who Lacks Motivation and Interestmukti majhiBelum ada peringkat
- Stakeholder Management Plan Template: Project Name Project ManagerDokumen5 halamanStakeholder Management Plan Template: Project Name Project ManagerhichemokokBelum ada peringkat
- AESTHETIC THEORY PG 1-213Dokumen206 halamanAESTHETIC THEORY PG 1-213kristanto50% (2)
- 123test - Report - Report - Work Values Test - 2022-03-02 - 23.31.52Dokumen37 halaman123test - Report - Report - Work Values Test - 2022-03-02 - 23.31.52Butt ManBelum ada peringkat
- MR CHRIST Water Refilling Station V2.0Dokumen47 halamanMR CHRIST Water Refilling Station V2.0Kent Torres100% (1)
- Lesson Plan Kinder ScienceDokumen16 halamanLesson Plan Kinder Sciencemayflor certicioBelum ada peringkat
- Educating For Creative Thinking The Waldorf ApproachDokumen11 halamanEducating For Creative Thinking The Waldorf ApproachmagaudelanataBelum ada peringkat
- Dual-Language LearningDokumen3 halamanDual-Language LearningPriyansh SinghBelum ada peringkat
- A Study On Preference of Learning Style in Relation To Academic Achievement in Commerce Among Higher Secondary School StudentsDokumen9 halamanA Study On Preference of Learning Style in Relation To Academic Achievement in Commerce Among Higher Secondary School StudentsEditor IJTSRDBelum ada peringkat
- Essential Research Skills For Teens Unit - Sheet1 2Dokumen9 halamanEssential Research Skills For Teens Unit - Sheet1 2api-642237718Belum ada peringkat
- Practicum Portfolio TemplateDokumen23 halamanPracticum Portfolio TemplateMarjorie Lee LathropBelum ada peringkat
- Intermediate ReadingDokumen2 halamanIntermediate Readingapi-33610044Belum ada peringkat
