http://educareers.co.

cc
http://educareers.co.cc

Soft fabric of T-rex

937

The recent discovery of soft fabric inside a fossilized femur of T-rex has
the young world of creationist of the ground bourdonner. They claim this al
arming obviousness supports a young ground clearly. However, as a science o
f usual creation and young person of the ground “seizes with the strawsâ€
• while being unaware of all the haystack (for bonds with the answers in ar
ticle of genesis, to see below). Much more interesting is what answers in t
he genesis omits original article, because they “select and choose,― ju
st as their model, only T…

To Get FREE Information on Top Schools, Colleges and Universities please v

isit http://educareers.co.cc
the science of creation

The recent discovery of soft fabric inside a fossilized femur of T-rex has
the young world of creationist of the ground bourdonner. They claim this al
arming obviousness supports a young ground clearly. However, as a science o
f usual creation and young person of the ground “seizes with the strawsâ€
• while being unaware of all the haystack (for bonds with the answers in ar
ticle of genesis, to see below). Much more interesting is what answers in t
he genesis omits original article, because they “select and choose,― ju
st as their model, only these parts which supports their position.

The young author of the ground calls this “an astounding refutation of th
e million years.― Nothing could be different truth. Instead of concentrat
ing only on only soft fabric (“straw―), we to leave examine the whole i
mage.

Hopes

Initially, some hopes. If we must find a certain fabric soft of the dinosaurs,
where is the most likely place to find it? The answer is obvious… in the mo
st recent fossils. T-rex was one of the end of the dinosaurs, alive in five mi
 http://educareers.co.cc
http://educareers.co.cc
llion last years of existence of dinosaur, there is of 70-65 million years.

Second hope… which parts of the body would intend to us to contain soft fa
bric? Here still, the answer is obvious. The soft fabric holds the best poss
ibility of safeguarding in a large bone, such as the femur of T-rex. The lar
ger the bone is, the more the “insulation― that the soft fabric has exte
rnal elements. The report/ratio of original source for this article, which c
ame from the magazine of Science, gives several key sentences, such as “th
e typical dense compact bone of the therapods,― and “the dense mineraliz
ation of the bone of dinosaur.― A large bone such as a femur of therapod w
ould be the most likely source of soft fabric, like the larger bone presents
a means of the external bone of being sealed by mineralization, burying the
interior contents and protecting them from the elements.

The third hope… if the ground were young, then us would expect that the ma
jority, if not all the large fossils of dinosaur highlight soft fabric… af
ter all, according to the young theory of the ground, of large dinosaurs the
re is of 200 million years at the same time of dead T-rex made, during the p
lethora of Noah. Thus, you should expect that all the large bones of dinosau
r are possible sources for soft fabric. However, it is not the case. With th
is fossil, we have a soft fabric sample, out of the million bones of dinosau
r which were gathered. Thus, this young ground “hope― is completely nonf
ounded.

Stratigraphy

The young science of creation of the ground “expert― Karl Wieland is una
ware of the stratigraphic place of the fossil. According to the article of m
agazine of Science, it was located “at the base of the formation of split
of hell, 8 m above the sandstone of hills of Fox.― The formation of split
of hell is late cretaceous in the age, and crosses really the border of K/T,
the point of extinction of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago. I would not
expect that a young theorist of the ground identifies the significance so s
ince they believe that the flood deposited all them these formation of rock.
However, it is clear stratigraphy that the dinosaurs all were not killed by
Flood of Noah. To learn more, read www.answersincreation.org/poop.htm.

Astounding omissions

What is much more astounding is this Wieland is unaware of more half of the
article, which compares images and data of T-rex with the images and data
of a fossilized ostrich. The similarities are astounding. More than anythin
 http://educareers.co.cc
http://educareers.co.cc
g, this fossil of T-rex lends the support to the theory which the birds evo
lved/moved of the dinosaurs.

In answer to this omission, three answers of days later (March 28th, 05) in
the genesis published another article addressing the comparisons of ostrich
(see below for the bond). The new author (Dr. David Menton) known as that it
is not the first time that the soft fabric was found, and it again provides
a bond already to the report/ratio of AiG of disproven on blood globules of
T-rex. Dr. Menton seems to evoke some valid arguments about the article of
Dr. Schweitzer' S, mainly that the comparisons of the structures of T-Rex an
d the ostrich would be common to the majority of the amphibians, reptiles, b
irds, or mammals. The claim made by Dr. Menton is that there is a not specif
ied conclusion that the dinosaurs were transformed into birds, and of this f
act it tries to criticize the similarities between the ostrich and T-Rex. Ho
wever, Dr. Schweitzer does not mention the evolution of the whole in his art
icle. It shows simply the similar devices between two organizations, which w
ere obtained similar procedures once applied to two different creatures.

Dr. Schweitzer can employ the comparison for the proof of the dinosaur to t
he evolution of bird, but it is more probable than it shows simply a modern
example, for the clearness of arrangement. Dr. Menton admits that he sees
a not specified conclusion that “this similarity of microscopic structure
shows that dinosaurs and the birds are closely bound by the evolution.―
Nowhere made Dr. Schweitzer lodge this complaint.

In the final analysis, the layman reading these articles must decide which s
cientist to believe. Since Dr. Schweitzer does not have any religious motiva
tion to prove a young person or old ground, his is the approach more objecti
ve, or just and balanced, and is in this case a scientific source more relia
ble than Dr. Menton (see www.answersincreation.org/scientist.htm).

Conclusion

The lucky find of soft fabric of T-Rex supports a young ground by no means.
In fact, when you consider the fact that we should find a fabric much softer
in all large bones of dinosaur, she supports really an old still better gro
und! Neither one nor the other article presents the information in a convinc
ing way which supports their cause.

Answers in article of genesis - copy/paste the bond below in your bar of

address of navigator. www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0325Dino_tissue.a
sp
 http://educareers.co.cc
http://educareers.co.cc

Answers in article of ostrich of genesis - copier/au beyond in your bar o

f address. www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0328discovery.asp