Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin ("Kimbeilin") heieby files a Complaint foi Bamages against Befenuants Aaion Walkei ("Walkei"), William Boge Si. ("Boge"), Robeit Stacy NcCain ("NcCain"), Ali Akbai ("Akbai") anu Lynn Thomas anu Petei u. Nalone, aka Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu ("K0") foi uefamation, malicious piosecution, haiassment, stalking, conspiiacy, invasion of piivacy anu infliction of emotional uistiess. &(-2/# %. -3# ($-,%& 1. This mattei aiises out of a multi-yeai campaign by Befenuants to smeai, uestioy anu impiison Plaintiff by knowingly, maliciously, anu intentionally filing numeious fiivolous, uefamatoiy anu malicious couit filings -- incluuing civil suits, peace oiueis, anu ciiminal chaiges - anu then publishing false, uefamatoiy, anu tasteless stoiies about those filings as if the allegations weie tiue, all the time iaising funus fiom unsuspecting people who ieau the stoiies. 2 2. Befenuants useu theii legal filings to stalk anu haiass Plaintiff, invaue his piivacy anu inflict emotional uistiess on him anu his family. S. Befenuants poitiayeu Plaintiff in a false light as engaging in ciiminal activity, being a peuophile, iapist anu uomestic teiioiist, anu engaging in uomestic violence. 4. Befenuants falsely wiote that othei taigets of theiis weie pait of "Team Kimbeilin" anu publisheu that Plaintiff contiolleu, paiu, anu uiiecteu this vast netwoik of "unsavoiy" opeiatives. S. None of these poitiayals is baseu on ieality. 6. The uefamatoiy statements maue by Befenuants weie publisheu on the Inteinet in vaiious foiums, incluuing blog posts, on Twittei, anu on message boaius, anu weie wiuely accessible to the public both uiiectly anu by uoogle seaiches, anu they weie seen by many people incluuing Plaintiff's business associates, fiienus anu family. They weie also publisheu in numeious couit uocuments fileu in couits in Nontgomeiy County anu Caiioll County Naiylanu, Piince William County viiginia, anu 0niteu States Bistiict Couit in uieenbelt, Naiylanu. They weie maue to vaiious law enfoicement officials. 7. Befenuants have peisisteu in theii smeai attacks uespite being askeu by Plaintiff to be left alone, to iemove false posts, anu to iespect the piivacy of Plaintiff anu his family. 8. Befenuants have piofiteu fiom theii attacks against Plaintiff by iaising funus online using his name anu theii false naiiatives, couit filings anu uefamatoiy S publications to uemonize him. They have also obtaineu othei things of value such as online tiaffic to theii websites. 9. Plaintiff has initiateu this action to iecovei compensatoiy uamages of moie than $7S,uuu anu punitive uamages fiom Befenuants foi the substantial injuiy they have causeu to Plaintiff by theii intentional infliction of emotional uistiess anu theii intentional, malicious anu outiageous conuuct. *(/-,#" 1u. Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin is the Biiectoi of }ustice Thiough Nusic, a Naiylanu baseu Su1cS non-piofit that uses music to inspiie people to engage in civic paiticipation. Plaintiff has helu that position foi almost ten yeais anu he iesiues in Bethesua, Naiylanu. 11. Aaion Walkei is an unemployeu attoiney who iesiues in Nanassas, viiginia who wiites a conseivative Inteinet blog calleu Alleigic2Bull, anu publishes on vaiious othei online outlets incluuing Twittei. 12. William Boge Si. is a conseivative bloggei who iesiues in Westminstei, Naiylanu anu wiites a blog calleu BogeWash. Be publishes on vaiious othei online outlets incluuing Twittei. 1S. Robeit Stacy NcCain is a conseivative bloggei who iesiues in Bageistown, Naiylanu who wiites a blog calleu The 0thei NcCain, anu publishes on vaiious othei online outlets incluuing Twittei, viial Reau anu The Ameiican Spectatoi. 14. Ali Akbai is the uiiectoi of The National Bloggeis Club who iesiues in Ft. Woith, Texas anu Lynchbuig, viiginia, anu he publishes on vaiious Inteinet 4
1S. sites anu on Twittei. Be is the ieputeu boss of Walkei, Boge anu NcCain anu has pioviueu each of them with iemuneiation. 16. Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu is an anonymous conseivative bloggei who has both a website anu a Twittei account that weie specifically cieateu to attack Plaintiff on a uaily basis. 17. The publications of the Befenuants aie available on the Inteinet in Naiylanu. Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain anu Akbai have all tiaveleu to Nontgomeiy County Naiylanu in the past yeai as pait of theii campaign anu conspiiacy to attack, smeai, stalk anu haiass Plaintiff. 72/,"',$-,%& (&' 6#&2# 18. This Couit has peisonal anu subject mattei juiisuiction ovei this mattei puisuant to Naiylanu Civil Coue. 19. venue is piopei because many, if not all of the acts occuiieu in Nontgomeiy County Naiylanu, Plaintiff is a citizen of Naiylanu anu Nontgomeiy County, the toits weie committeu in Nontgomeiy County, anu the injuiies weie sustaineu in Nontgomeiy County. "-(-#)#&- %. -3# .($-" 2u. In 2u1u, Plaintiff fileu a uefamation suit in this Couit against a bloggei nameu Seth Allen. That suit iesulteu in a juugment in Plaintiff's favoi on Novembei 16, 2u11. 21. Befenuant Walkei, using the pseuuonym Aaion Woithing, attempteu to assist Ni. Allen in post juugment motions until Plaintiff iuentifieu him as S Aaion Walkei, the publishei of a Nuslim hate blog calleu Eveiyone Biaw Nohammeu. }uuge Quiik uenieu Befenuant Walkei's post tiial motion to ueclaie Plaintiff a public figuie. 22. Aftei Befenuant Walkei was iuentifieu, he began stalking Plaintiff anu haiassing him with couit filings anu uefamatoiy attacks. Be came to a couit heaiing on }anuaiy 9, 2u12 anu assaulteu Plaintiff outsiue the couitioom. Be fileu multiple ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff in Nontgomeiy County in 2u12, he fileu a civil suit against Plaintiff in Piince William County viiginia in 2u12, anu he fileu a civil suit against Plaintiff in 0niteu States Bistiict Couit in uieenbelt in 2u12. All of these cases weie nolle piosseu oi uismisseu as without meiit. 2S. In Naich 2u1S, Befenuant Walkei attempteu to file a Peace 0iuei against Plaintiff in Nontgomeiy County but was uenieu. 24. In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Walkei fuithei stalkeu Plaintiff by attenuing, uninviteu, a family couit mattei involving Plaintiff anu Plaintiff's wife, anu then following the wife out of the couitioom, making contact with hei, offeiing hei things of value, piepaiing false uocuments foi hei to file in couit, anu auvising hei to make false allegations anu change hei allegations against Plaintiff both ciiminally anu civilly. Befenuant Walkei then publisheu these false allegations on his blog anu on Twittei, anu hau the othei Befenuants uo the same on theii blogs anu on Twittei. These uefamatoiy publications by Befenuant Walkei falsely stateu categoiically that Plaintiff is a iapist, peuophile anu committeu uomestic violence against his wife. 6 2S. Piioi to meeting with Befenuants Walkei anu Boge, Plaintiff's wife hau stateu iepeateuly in couit, in filings anu unuei oath that Plaintiff nevei sexually abuseu oi engageu in uomestic violence. It was only aftei Befenuants Walkei anu Boge manipulateu hei in a fiagile mental state anu cieateu theii false naiiative, even typing uocuments foi hei to file, anu taking hei to the couithouse, that she fileu the false uocuments. 26. Befenuant Walkei actually wiote anu typeu uefamatoiy couit uocuments that he inuuceu Plaintiff's wife to file, anu Befenuant Walkei manipulateu hei to uo so. Befenuant Walkei then wiote out hei entiie piesentation in couit, tolu hei what to say, anu how to say it, knowing that it was false anu uefamatoiy. 27. 0vei the past two yeais, Befenuant Walkei has publisheu hunuieus of blog posts anu thousanus of Twittei tweets falsely accusing Plaintiff of numeious ciimes anu othei nefaiious activity, incluuing iape, peuophilia anu uomestic violence. 28. Befenuant Walkei has ieciuiteu Befenuants Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 to wiite hunuieus of false anu uefamatoiy blog posts anu Twittei tweets ovei the past yeai attacking Plaintiff as a ciiminal iapist anu peuophile who commits uomestic violence. 29. Befenuant Walkei has stateu scoies of times on his blog, in Twittei tweets anu elsewheie that his goal is to have Plaintiff impiisoneu anu have his business uestioyeu. 7 Su. In 2u1S, Befenuant Boge fileu a false Peace 0iuei anu two malicious ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff in Caiioll County accusing Plaintiff of haiassing him. That Peace 0iuei was uenieu in }une 2u1S anu the ciiminal chaiges weie nolle piosseu in Apiil 2u1S. S1. Befenuant Boge has wiitten liteially hunuieus of blog posts attacking Plaintiff, anu uiiecteu attention to them with thousanus of Twittei tweets. Be wiites a uaily "Team Kimbeilin Post of the Bay" which accuses Plaintiff oi otheis he falsely states aie unuei the contiol of Plaintiff of engaging in some type of ciiminal oi nefaiious activity. Ni. Boge has stalkeu Plaintiff by attenuing couit pioceeuings that uo not involve him, anu then publishing twisteu accounts of those heaiings that always poitiay Plaintiff in a negative light. S2. In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Boge fuithei stalkeu Plaintiff by attenuing a family couit mattei involving Plaintiff anu Plaintiff's wife, anu then following the wife out of the couitioom, making contact with hei, offeiing hei things of value, piepaiing false uocuments foi hei to file in couit, anu auvising hei to make false allegations against Plaintiff both ciiminally anu civilly. Befenuant Boge then publisheu these false allegations on his blog anu on Twittei, anu hau the othei Befenuants uo the same on theii blogs anu on Twittei. These uefamatoiy publications falsely stateu categoiically that Plaintiff is a peuophile, iapist anu committeu uomestic violence against his wife. In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Boge publisheu an online funuiaising tool on his blog to ostensibly iaise funus foi Plaintiff's wife, anu foi hei legal iepiesentation 8 SS. by the same attoiney who iepiesenteu Befenuant Boge in his pievious malicious filings against Plaintiff in Caiioll County. At least $S,uuu of those funus weie then useu to pay foi that attoiney who theieby benefitteu fiom the malicious legal action. This legal funuiaising tool is pait of a pattein of conuuct that the Befenuants useu pieviously in othei couit cases, which always iesulteu in attoineys anu Befenuants, incluuing Befenuant Walkei, ieceiving a financial benefit while uefaming anu haiassing Plaintiff. Befenuant Walkei also useu saiu legal uefense funus iaiseu in pievious filings foi living expenses while claiming that he neeueu saiu funus because Plaintiff causeu him to lose his pievious job, which was anothei false naiiative. This pattein of conuuct of using Plaintiff to iaise funus keeps the false naiiatives going, while eniiching the Befenuants. S4. In August 2u1S, Plaintiff's wife auviseu Befenuants Boge, Walkei anu NcCain that she uiu not want them iaising any money on hei behalf oi using hei name foi any puipose, anu askeu them to iemove all blog anu Twittei tweets they hau publisheu about hei since }uly 9, 2u1S because they weie inaccuiate anu haimful to hei family. She also askeu Befenuant Boge to iefunu all the uonations he has gotten using hei name. Befenuants iefuseu to iemove the blog posts anu tweets, incluuing those posts asking people to senu money foi Plaintiff's wife. SS. In }uly anu August 2u1S, Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 all publisheu blog posts anu tweets quoting fiom a uefamatoiy filing piepaieu by Befenuant Walkei in the Family Couit case. That filing falsely accuseu 9 Plaintiff of iape, peuophilia anu uomestic violence. Befenuant Walkei also piepaieu a uefamatoiy filing that he manipulateu Plaintiff's wife to file with the Nontgomeiy County State's Attoiney falsely accusing Plaintiff of ciiminal activity. That ciiminal chaige was nolle piosseu on August 2S, 2u1S. S6. The State's Attoiney ioutinely expunges cases that aie nolle piosseu within a shoit peiiou of time. Bespite this, Befenuant Boge, piioi to expungement, went to the Bistiict Couit, got a ceitifieu copy of the uefamatoiy filing, anu then posteu it online in oiuei to cause Plaintiff haim. Be infoimeu otheis about the posting anu askeu them to spieau it on the Inteinet, which they uiu in oiuei to cause Plaintiff moie haim fiom the false ciiminal chaige that they cieateu, wiote anu causeu to be fileu. S7. The State's Attoiney, Nontgomeiy County Police Bepaitment anu the Bepaitment of Social Seivices all founu that the Befenuant-cieateu allegations of iape, peuophilia anu uomestic abuse weie wholly without meiit, anu theiefoie uismisseu all chaiges anu investigations. S8. 0n August 2S, 2u1S, Plaintiff's wife fileu to uismiss the Family Couit case anu also askeu the Couit to seal all the iecoius in the cases. She tolu Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain about the uismissal, anu tolu them that the allegations Befenuant Walkei wiote foi hei in couit filings anu online weie inaccuiate. Befenuant Walkei iesponueu by falsely suggesting that Plaintiff was blackmailing Plaintiff's wife. Befenuant Walkei uigeu hei to uestioy Plaintiff's family by continuing with the false naiiatives he piepaieu foi hei. Befenuant Walkei then iefuseu hei iequests to iemove postsaiticles 1u alieauy wiitten by him, anu claimeu that Plaintiff was an unfit fathei anu that Plaintiff's wife knew it, anu she shoulu leave him anu take hei chiluien fiom him as soon as possible. S9. Befenuant Akbai stateu on oi about August 18, 2u1S, that he contiols Befenuants Boge, Walkei anu NcCain anu can oiuei them to stop posting negative stoiies about a taigeteu peison. 4u. Befenuant Akbai tweeteu many times in }uly anu August 2u1S, that Plaintiff is a ciiminal peuophile, iapist anu abusei of women. 41. Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 piomoteu the unauthoiizeu funuiaising tool anu piofiteu fiom the money iaiseu. Befenuant Boge, who contiolleu the money iaiseu thiough his PayPal account, iefuseu Plaintiff's wife's uemanu that all the money be ietuineu to the uonois, insteau saying he woulu give it to chaiity. Befenuant Boge latei stateu that he paiu $Suuu of the iaiseu funus to the attoiney who iepiesenteu Plaintiff's wife in a two houi peace oiuei heaiing. 42. Befenuant NcCain publisheu accounts on Befenuant Akbai's anu his "#$ %&#$' ()*+,- anu .,'+/ R$+0 websites in which he calleu Plaintiff a vile, sauistic, anu abusive peison. Be attackeu a iepoitei fiom the Washington Post who wiote a positive stoiy about Plaintiff's family in 2uu7 calling hei anu the Washington post "agents of evil." Be went even fuitheiing a }uly 16, 2u1S web post: "The 1+2#,-3&4- 542& is a uisgiace to jouinalism that employs hiieu liais like Nonica Besse. The 1+2#,-3&4- 542& anu Nonica Besse aie engageu in a conspiiacy to conceal the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin. In 2uu7, Nonica Besse uiu not tell the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin, anu in 2u1S, she will not 11 tell the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin. The tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin has nevei been piinteu in the1+2#,-3&4- 542&, noi will it evei be. No honest peison woulu woik foi the 1+2#,-3&4- 542&, which only publishes evil lies."
Be fuithei attackeu Plaintiff's 14 yeai olu uaughtei in at least one tweet on August 28, 2u1S. 4S. Befenuant K0 has cieateu a website calleu Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu anu a Twittei site Kimbeilinunmask at which he falsely accuses Plaintiff of vaiious ciimes incluuing peuophilia, iape anu uomestic violence. These sites aie intenueu to smeai anu haim Plaintiff's ieputation with false allegations, innuenuo, speculation, false associations anu false accusations of supeivision. 44. 0n Fiiuay 0ctobei 11, 2u1S, Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain appeaieu live on a iauio piogiam hosteu by Befenuant Akbai anu iepeateu theii uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff. Anu they stateu that the uocuments they cieateu anu wiote foi Plaintiff's wife weie tiue uespite hei withuiawing them anu telling them that they weie false. 4S. Befenuants aie not legitimate jouinalists anu they uo not follow the Society of Piofessional }ouinalist Coue of Ethics. Aftei the filing of this lawsuit, Befenuant Boge has attempteu to cieate the false impiession that he is a jouinalist by paying a fee foi a membeiship in a jouinalist society. -89 +:;<=>?<1 *9:@9 %AB9A< :CB $A>D>C:E $8:AF9< 46. Befenuant Walkei has fileu the following lawsuits, Peace 0iueis anu ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff since }anuaiy 2u12: }anuaiy S1, 2u12, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, 0ne Count Peijuiy (nolle piosseu Febiuaiy 1u, 2u12) 12 Apiil 17, 2u12, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, Five Counts Peijuiy (nolle piosseu Apiil Su, 2u12) }anuaiy Su, 2u12, Piince William viiginia Ciicuit Couit, Nultiple Counts Alleging Ciiminal anu Civil Toits (uismisseu by juuge Becembei 4, 2u12) }une 22, 2u12, 0niteu States Bistiict Couit Naiylanu, uieenbelt, Nultiple Civil Toits, (uismisseu by juuge Novembei 26, 2u12) Naich 1S, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, Peace 0iuei (uenieu by juuge on Naich 1S, 2u1S) Becembei 2u11, Nontgomeiy County Ciicuit Couit, numeious filings foi Seth Allen alleging fiauu anu peijuiy (uenieu }anuaiy 9, 2u12) }uly Su, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, piepaieu pleauing in Family Couit mattei alleging iape anu uomestic violence (uenieu August 12, 2u1S) }uly 29, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, piepaieu ciiminal chaige foi thiiu uegiee sexual assault (nolle piosseu August 2S, 2u1S) 47. Befenuant Boge has fileu the following Peace 0iueis anu ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff since Febiuaiy 18, 2u1S: Febiuaiy 18, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, Two Counts Baiassment (nolle piosseu Apiil 17, 2u1S) Naich 22, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, 0ne Count Baiassment (nolle piosseu Apiil 17, 2u1S) Naich 22, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, Peace 0iuei (uenieu Naich 29, 2u1S) 1S Apiil S, 2u1S, Caiioll County Ciicuit Couit, Peace 0iuei Appeal (uenieu }uly 2, 1u1S) 48. Plaintiff has been iequiieu to iesponu to many of the above fiivolous anu malicious legal filings, anu has been foiceu to appeai in couit to attenu manuatoiy heaiings on moie than a uozen occasions, incluuing having to uiive long uistances to Nanassas, viiginia wheie the Piince William County Ciicuit Couit is locateu, anu to Westminstei, Naiylanu wheie the Caiioll County Couits aie locateu. 49. Plaintiff has expenueu legal fees to an attoiney to iepiesent him in one of the Peace 0iueis in Caiioll County. Plaintiff has boine costs of iesponuing incluuing mailing, copies, tiansciipts, auuio files, tianspoitation anu othei costs. Su. Some specific examples of Befenuants' uefamatoiy publications aie as follows: (:AGC H:EI9AJ(EE9AF>@KL=EE1 -;>??9AM(:AGCHGA?8>CF1 0:N9??9 August 28, 2u1S-Bethesua uazette-Comments believeu to be wiitten oi uiiecteu by Befenuant Walkei unuei one oi moie names-Biett.committeu iape August 1S, 2u1S-vile, Biett Kimbeilin's Nanipulation of Bis Baughtei August 12, 2u1S- Biett Kimbeilin is an out-anu-out peuophile August 6, 2u1S-The Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin's "Biass Knuckle Befense" August S, 2u1S-So Why is the Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin Nau at 0s August S, 2u1S-Foi the Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin, It's All About the Kius 14 August 1, 2u1S-if you just believe in helping get hei kius away fiom hei peuophile husbanu }uly S1, 2u1S-Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin violates A Bomestic violence Piotective 0iuei }uly Su, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin is a Peuophile August 1u, 2u1S-Twittei-Lu is the paiu tioll of peuophile Biett Kimbeilin August 1u, 2u1S-Twittei-I suggest we iechiisten Team Kimbeilin as Team Peuophilia August 6, 2u1S-Twittei-The Peuophile #BiettKimbeilin Biass Knuckle Befense August S, 2u1S-Twittei-Why is Peuophile #BiettKimbeilin Nau At 0s August 4, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin will have his tiial. But I uon't have to wait to call him a peuo. August S, 2u1S-Twittei-Yes, #Biett Kimbeilin is a peuo iegaiuless of chaiges }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#Biett Kimbeilin violates A Bomestic violence Piotective 0iuei }uly Su, 2u1S-Twittei-next heaiing uate will be in ciicuit couit, wheie PeuoBiett tenus to lose. }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin is a Peuophile }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-What uoes #Biett Kimbeilin, who tiieu to have sex with a 12-yeai olu, ueseive. }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-I am not calling him allegeuly anything. Be is a peuophile. 1S }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-So I am going to say something uefinitive. #Biett Kimbeilin is a peuophile. H>EE>:D 3GF9J3GF9;:<8 :CB -;>??9A M;OO8GF9 August 1S, 2u1S-She not only neeus help with the legal expense involveu in getting heiself anu hei uaughteis fiee fiom Biett, she neeus help iesettling heiself August 14, 2u1S- The Kimbeibots aie the fanboys, cheeileaueis, anu enableis who tweet anu blog theii aumiiation anu suppoit foi The Bieau Peuo Kimbeilin August 1S, 2u1S- You can uonate to help Tetyana get heiself anu hei chiluien away fiom hei abusive husbanu. Click on the Tetyana's Funu link to leain moie. August 1S, 2u1S- Tetyana Kimbeilin is tiying to get heiself fiee fiom hei abusive husbanu. She is tiying to get hei chiluien away fiom hei peuophile husbanu. August 12, 2u1S- Buiing that time, he has useu mentally abusive tactics to keep hei anu hei chiluien bounu to him August 1, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin, Bieau Peuo Kimbeilin }uly Su, 2u1S- Bowevei, I uo believe that Biett Kimbeilin most likely is a peuophile. }uly 29-August 1S, 2u1S-Twittei-Team Kimbeilin Post of the Bay (uiiecting ieaueis to his Bogewash posts above) }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin:Peuophile. 16 /GP9A? "?:@Q )@$:>CJ-89 %?89A )@$:>C }uly 18, 2u1S-If Biett Kimbeilin hates you, he will uo anything within his powei to haim you even though he ueiives no benefit fiom these uestiuctive acts othei than the sauistic vengeful pleasuie of inflicting haim. }uly 18, 2u1S- Evil is what Biett Kimbeilin is. Evil is what Biett Kimbeilin uoes. Eveiyone who assists Biett Kimbeilin is an accomplice to evil, anu silence about Biett Kimbeilin's evil is a foim of assistance (E> (IP:AJ-;>??9AJM:E> August 1S, 2u1S-Twittei-We'ie about to iaise some money foi an abuseu immigiant tiying to escape #BiettKimbeilin. August 9, 2u1S-Twittei-pointeu out Biett Kimbeilin's peuophilia }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-Peuophile anu teiioiist bombei #Biett Kimbeilin }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei- Police, myself, anu eveiyone who has wiitten seiiously on the mattei believe that #BiettKimbeilin killeu a gianuma to sleep with a 1u yi olu. }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#Biett Kimbeilin has no moial equivalent this siue of Satan. }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#BiettKimbeilin is a peuophile. }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-So we've uncoveieu #BiettKimbeilin's big seciet: he's a peuophile with othei peuophiles aiounu his chiluien! 4>DP9AE>C2C):<I9BJ4>DP9AE>C2CD:<I9B LEGF :CB -;>??9A M4>DP9AE>C2CD:<I 17 August 1S, 2u1S-Bill Schmalfelut is the woist misogynist I've evei heaiu of, except Biett Kimbeilin }uly Su, 2u1S-I am going to ie-name Team Kimbeilin to Team Peuo. It's shoitei anu it's in Biett Kimbeilin's honoi. August 1, 2u1S- The implications of Biett Kimbeilin selling viagia aie uistuibing, consiueiing we aie talking peuophilia }uly 29, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin, Peuophile. }uly-August 2u1S-Kimbeilin0nmaskeu supeiimposeu a copyiighteu photo of Plaintiff's face on to what is unueistoou to be a giaphic of a peuophilia beai to poitiay Plaintiff as a peuophile. Be uiu this without consent. S1. The statements of the Befenuants as set out above cast Plaintiff in a false light. S2. Befenuants' puipose in publishing the above statements was to cause injuiy to Plaintiff's ieputation, business anu family. SS. The false statements above have causeu Plaintiff seiious emotional uistiess, embaiiassment, humiliation anu mental anguish. S4. Plaintiff has iepeateuly askeu Befenuant Walkei anu Befenuant Boge to leave him anu his family alone but they have continueu to haiass anu stalk him anu his family, both online anu in peison. SS. Plaintiff has askeu Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu to iemove copyiighteu photos fiom his blog site but Kimbeilin0nmaskeu not only iefuseu to uo so but actually posteu moie copyiighteu photos along with insults anu mocking stating that he woulu nevei iemove any mateiial fiom the blog. 18 S6. Plaintiff's wife iepeateuly askeu Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain to iemove posts about hei anu hei family fiom theii websites anu Twittei but they have iefuseu to uo so. $%2&- , ):E>@>G=< *AG<9@=?>GC
S7. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. S8. Befenuants Walkei anu Boge have engageu in a pattein of filing abusive civil suits, peace oiueis anu ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff, all of which have been uismisseu oi uenieu, foi the puipose of cieating false naiiatives about Plaintiff that they then publish as gospel, theieby haiming Plaintiff, his business inteiests anu his family. These filings have been uone with malice anu without piobable cause. Befenuants have useu these false, malicious filings to iaise significant funus to eniich themselves. S9. Befenuants' false anu malicious piosecutions have causeu Plaintiff to sustain uamages. 6u. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious, weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff. 61. Thus, in filing malicious legal actions against Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu to pay substantial punitive uamages. $%2&- ,, $GC<R>A:@Q ?G (P=<9 *AG@9<< 19 62. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 6S. Befenuants Walkei, Boge, Akbai, NcCain anu Kimbeilin0nmaskeu have conspiieu to engage in a pattein of filing abusive civil suits, peace oiueis anu ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff, all of which have been uismisseu oi uenieu, foi the puipose of cieating false naiiatives about Plaintiff that they then publish as gospel, theieby haiming Plaintiff, his business inteiests anu his family. These filings have been uone with malice anu without piobable cause. Befenuants have useu these false, malicious filings to iaise significant funus to eniich themselves. 64. Befenuants' conspiiacy of false anu malicious piosecutions has causeu Plaintiff to sustain uamages. 6S. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious, weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff. 66. Thus, in filing malicious legal actions against Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu to pay substantial punitive uamages.
$%2&- ,,, '9S:D:?>GC 2u
67. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 68. Befenuants have intentionally, knowingly anuoi iecklessly publisheu anu uisseminateu the false anu uefamatoiy statements iuentifieu above on the Inteinet wheie they have been easily accessible, anu weie accesseu my many people, incluuing Plaintiff's family, chiluien, fiienus, business associates anu actual anu piospective paitneis anu otheis. 69. The statements have causeu anu continue to cause substantial injuiy to Plaintiff, his business anu peisonal well-being. 7u. The statements have causeu anu continue to cause ueep embaiiassment, humiliation, oppiobiium, emotional uistiess anu mental suffeiing to Plaintiff. 71. Befenuants' false anu uefamatoiy statements anu the implications uiawn fiom them conceining Plaintiff aie uefamatoiy 6$' 2$ because they allege vile ciimes anu make Plaintiff appeai ouious, infamous, anuoi fiightening. 72. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements to thiiu paities who ieasonably unueistoou the publisheu statements to be uefamatoiy. 7S. Befenuants weie awaie of the uefamatoiy implication of theii statements about Plaintiff, anu intenueu anu enuoiseu the uefamatoiy implication. 74. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff even though they knew that Plaintiff hau tolu them to leave him anu his family alone. 7S. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff with knowleuge of theii falsity anuoi ieckless uisiegaiu foi theii tiuth. 21 76. Alteinatively, Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff negligently as the tiuth oi falsity of what they weie saying. 77. Each of the Befenuants was uiiectly involveu anu iesponsible foi the false anu uefamatoiy statements that weie publisheu about Plaintiff. 78. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements with both common law anu actual malice, anu with the intent of haiming Plaintiff. 79. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements uay aftei uay, week aftei week, with the attacks becoming moie aggiessive anu nastiei as time piogiesseu. 8u. Befenuants also publisheu these uefamatoiy anu false statements in oiuei to inciease tiaffic to theii blogs anu to iaise money fiom unsuspecting ieaueis who believeu theii statements. 81. Befenuants' false anu uefamatoiy statements have causeu Plaintiff to sustain uamages. 82. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious, weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff. 8S. Befenuants iefuseu Plaintiff's iequest to be left alone anu iefuseu Plaintiff's wife's iequest to iemove the uefamatoiy anu false statements uespite knowing that what they hau publisheu about Plaintiff was false anu uefamatoiy anu hau causeu uamage to Plaintiff anu his family. 84. Thus, in publishing the numeious false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi 22 callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu to pay substantial punitive uamages. $%2&- ,6 .:E<9 +>F8? ,CT:<>GC GS *A>T:@Q
8S. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 86. Befenuants' statements anu aiticles above containeu false statements, iepiesentations oi imputations about Plaintiff that place him in a false light. 87. As stateu in Count III above, Befenuants falsely uepicteu Plaintiff a iapist, peuophile anu uomestic violence abusei, 88. Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu uepicteu Plaintiff's face on a peuophilia beai giaphic in oiuei to falsely uepict Plaintiff as a peuophile. 89. The false light in which Befenuants placeu Plaintiff woulu be consiueieu highly offensive to a ieasonable peison. 9u. Befenuants weie each complicit in anu iesponsible foi casting Plaintiff in a false light. 91. Befenuants uisseminateu theii aiticles on theii websites wheie they weie wiuely available to anu accessible by membeis of the geneial public in Naiylanu anu beyonu. 92. Befenuants knew that theii actions anu statements hau the effect of casting Plaintiff in a false light but neveitheless continueu to uo so week aftei week, aiticle aftei aiticle anu tweet aftei tweet. 2S 9S. Alteinatively, Befenuants weie negligent in the publication of theii statements about Plaintiff, the effect of which was to poitiay Plaintiff in a false light. 94. Befenuants' poitiayal of Plaintiff in a false light, as stateu above, causeu substantial injuiy to Plaintiff's ieputation, business inteiests, anu mental well-being. 9S. Befenuants' placing Plaintiff in a false light has causeu Plaintiff to sustain substantial uamages. 96. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious, anu weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff. 97. Befenuants iefuseu Plaintiff's iequests to be left alone anu Plaintiff's wife's iequest to iemove the uefamatoiy aiticles anu tweets knowing that what they hau publisheu hau cast Plaintiff in a false light anu hau causeu seiious injuiy to him. 98. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi caieless inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages. $%2&- 6 3:A:<<D9C?
99. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 1uu. Plaintiff has iepeateuly askeu Befenuants, both uiiectly anu inuiiectly, to be left alone. 1u1. Befenuants have iefuseu to leave Plaintiff alone anu they have publisheu anu continue to publish false anu uefamatoiy aiticles anu tweets 24 about Plaintiff on a iegulai anu even uaily basis. Befenuant Boge publishes a "Team Kimbeilin" post of the uay. Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu cieateu a blog anu a Twittei account specifically to attack Plaintiff with haiassing anu uefamatoiy publications. Befenuant NcCain haiasses Plaintiff on his blog with iegulai attacks, anu even attacks people who publish positive aiticles about Plaintiff oi his family. Befenuant Akbai issues oiueis to the othei Befenuants to attack Plaintiff, anu then uoes so himself. 1u2. Befenuants Walkei anu Boge have appeaieu at couit heaiings involving Plaintiff in which they weie not a paity. 0n }uly 9, 2u1S, Befenuants Walkei anu Boge followeu Plaintiff's wife out of a family couit heaiing anu baugeieu anu fiighteneu hei, anu latei even wiote uefamatoiy legal filings that they compelleu hei to file while she was suffeiing uuiess, anu manipulateu hei into acquiescing to theii uemanus to haim Plaintiff. When she tolu them that she wanteu nothing moie to uo with them, Befenuant Walkei uefameu Plaintiff, calling him an unfit fathei. Be beggeu hei not to iemain with hei Plaintiff husbanu. 1uS. Befenuants NcCain anu Akbai appeaieu at a family couit heaiing on }uly 29, 2u1S, anu offeieu Plaintiff's wife things of value to tuin against Plaintiff. 1u4. Plaintiff's wife askeu Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain to iemove false anu haiassing blog posts anu tweets they hau publisheu about hei anu Plaintiff but those iequests have been iefuseu. 2S 1uS. Aftei the filing of the oiiginal complaint in this case, Befenuants ietaliateu against Plaintiff foi exeicising his statutoiy anu constitutional iight to ieuiess in this case by incieasing theii haiassment of Plaintiff with moie uefamatoiy blog posts, aiticles anu tweets. Befenuant Ali launcheu a new Twittei account calleu BombeiSues anu a new website calleu www.bombeisuesbloggeis.com, which ietaliates against Plaintiff with uefamation anu haiassment because he fileu this action. 1u6. Befenuants' haiassment has been a malicious couise of conuuct, anu they have uone so in public places anu on the Inteinet foi the puipose of seiiously annoying anu alaiming him. 1u7. Befenuants have haiasseu Plaintiff intentionally anu with malice in oiuei to haim Plaintiff. 1u8. Befenuants' haiassment has causeu substantial uamage anu injuiy to Plaintiff. 1u9. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi caieless inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages. $%2&- 6, ,CSE>@?>GC %S #DG?>GC:E '><?A9<<
11u. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 111. Befenuants, by engaging in a multi-yeai couise of conuuct of malicious piosecution, stalking, haiassment, uefamation, invasion of piivacy, anu conspiiacy, have causeu Plaintiff infliction of emotional uistiess. 26 112. Befenuants' conuuct has been intentional, ieckless, extieme anu outiageous. The Befenuants have saiu that they want to uestioy Plaintiff, to iuin his family anu business anu to see him impiisoneu. They have cieateu false naiiatives anu fileu anu conspiieu to file malicious legal complaints in oiuei to haim Plaintiff anu line theii pockets with uonations fiom unsuspecting ieaueis. 11S. Theie is a causal anu uiiect connection between the Befenuants' wiongful conuuct anu Plaintiff's emotional uistiess. 114. The uistiess causeu by Befenuants' conuuct has been seveie anu causeu substantial uamage anu injuiy to Plaintiff. 11S. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages. $%2&- 6,, "?:EI>CF
1uS Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above. 1u4 Befenuants Walkei, Boge, Ali anu NcCain have engageu in a couise of conuuct of appioaching anu puisuing Plaintiff knowing that conuuct ieasonably placeu Plaintiff in ieasonable feai of assault. 1uS Befenuants' stalking has placeu Plaintiff in ieasonable feai of assault. This ieasonable feai is baseu on an assault of Plaintiff by Befenuant Walkei on }anuaiy 9, 2u12 in the Nontgomeiy County Ciicuit Couithouse when he came to a heaiing uninviteu anu attackeu Plaintiff. That assault lanueu Plaintiff in the hospital. Befenuant Walkei has iepeateuly stateu that he 27 caiiies weapons anu that he wants to uestioy Plaintiff. Befenuants Walkei anu Boge tolu Plaintiff's wife that they want to put Plaintiff in piison foi the iest of his life. 1u6 Befenuant Walkei has iepeateuly calleu state anu feueial law enfoicement officials anu maue false iepoits to them that Plaintiff has committeu ciimes. Befenuant Walkei calleu the FBI on oi about August 12, 2u1S anu tolu them to suipiise Plaintiff's wife at a location known to him, anu Befenuant Walkei tolu the FBI falsely that Plaintiff's wife woulu pioviue eviuence of ciimes by Plaintiff to the FBI. When the FBI talkeu with Plaintiff's wife, she stateu that Plaintiff uiu not commit the ciimes allegeu by Befenuant Walkei. 1u7 Befenuants have stalkeu Plaintiff intentionally anu with malice in oiuei to haim Plaintiff. 1u8 Befenuants' stalking has causeu substantial uamage anu injuiy to Plaintiff. 1u9 Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi caieless inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages. /#U2#"-#' /#+,#. WBEREF0RE, Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin iespectfully iequests that the Couit entei juugment as follows: 1. Awaiuing Plaintiff compensatoiy, consequential, anu speculative uamages in an amount in excess of $7S,uuu; 2. Awaiuing Plaintiff punitive uamages of no less than $1 million; S. Awaiuing Plaintiff costs anu othei expenses; anu 28 4. Awaiuing Plaintiff such othei anu fuithei ielief as the Couit ueems just anu piopei. 72/5 '#)(&' Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin heieby uemanus a juiy tiial on all claims tiiable. Bateu this 1 st uay of Apiil, 2u1S. Respectfully submitteu, Biett Kimbeilin 81uu Beech Tiee Roau Bethesua, NB 2u817
Medieval Indian History - The Rise of The VIJAYANAGARA Empire in South India and The Establishment of The PORTUGUESE - SADASHIV ARAYA AND RAMARA YA 1543-1571 A.D PDF