National
Student
Forum
Annual Report
Foreword 03
Executive Summary 05
Introduction 10
Chapter 1: Teaching and Learning 12
Chapter 2: Employability 32
Chapter 3: Postgraduate students 46
Chapter 4: Mature and Part-time students 60
Chapter 5: Disabled students 72
Chapter 6: Accommodation 78
Appendix A: NSF Member biogs 88
Appendix B: Update and review of progress 94
Contents
02 National Student Forum – Annual Report
Welcome to the second Annual Report of the National Student Forum, which outlines our work during
the academic year 2008-09. Since the publication of our first report in October 2008, we have
been pleased to see the growing interest in the Forum from ministers and policymakers as well as
from universities and colleges. I hope that the work that we’ve undertaken this year will continue to
encourage and inspire continuing improvement across the sector.
This year, the impact of the economic climate on graduating students has been a major concern
across HE and this was the driver behind our decision to focus on improving employability. It also
provided the backdrop to our reflections on the experiences of postgraduate, mature and part-time
students and the need for higher education to continue to evolve to meet the changing needs of
students and the wider community.
Our job as a Forum is in some ways a simple one. Our membership comprises a diverse range of
higher education students who volunteer their time: undergraduates and postgraduates, full-time and
part-time; younger and more mature; disabled and non-disabled; home and international students. As
such, we don’t profess to be experts in the sector in all its complexity, but we are experts in what it is
like to experience higher education and in understanding how different aspects of HE might look from
a student perspective if things are working well.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the ministers, sector experts and Vice-Chancellors
who met with us over the course of the year and provided invaluable information about what is
already happening in the higher education landscape. We’ve outlined recommendations on specific
aspects of Government policy that we would like to see addressed. As we further engage with
sector organisations, we have become increasingly aware that some of the issues that we have
surfaced arise from a gap between the rhetoric of systems and procedures and the reality of many
students’ experiences. In these instances, we are particularly keen to work with sector organisations
and institutions to hear their views on what else could be done – by Government, by their particular
organisation or by other organisations or institutions – to help to close this gap.
This year, we’ve also included ‘snapshots’ and case studies as illustrative examples of what is already
working well, along with the ways in which we would hope to see all universities and colleges
supporting students in each of our key areas of discussion. We welcome feedback from individual
universities and colleges about any specific improvements or approaches that our report encourages
you to take.
Finally, many of our members came to the end of their term of appointment in June, and I’d like to
take this opportunity to thank them for their energy and dedication over the course of this year. It has
been inspirational to work alongside so many people committed to improving the experience of their
peers. I look forward to taking forward our work next year, with members both old and new and to
continuing our collaboration with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and other key
sector stakeholders to improve the experience of all students in higher education.
Maeve Sherlock,
Chair, National Student Forum
0 D H YH¡
Foreword
03 National Student Forum – Annual Report
04 National Student Forum – Annual Report
For each key topic, the Forum developed: We therefore urge Government and/or
Overview national sector organisations, as appropriate,
of report an ideal vision of what it would be like for to consider how these recommendations
students if everything is working well in might be taken forward most effectively –
approach this area either individually or collaboratively. We invite
and suggestions as to how individual stakeholders to view our work as an invitation
to engage in ongoing dialogue to bring about
outcomes universities and colleges can support
students in this area improvement for all students in the future.
The NSF was set up to help define ‘a The Government will respond publicly to the
reasonable student experience’ and to report’s recommendations.
make recommendations to Government to
help to achieve this. However, many of our The National Student Forum was set up by the
suggestions for improvement fall within the gift former Department for Innovation, Universities
of individual universities and colleges, rather and Skills (now the Department for Business,
than Government policy. Therefore, we outline Innovation and Skills) in early 2008 to give a
our recommended practice for universities and greater voice to students on higher education
colleges in each of our key discussion areas, (HE) courses across England and to ensure that
against which we invite individual institutions to policies are the better for being informed by the
measure their current practice. student voice. It is required to produce an annual
report for ministerial review and comment.
We readily acknowledge that many universities
and colleges may already be implementing The 2008-09 Forum consisted of an
some of these practices, but urge all independent Chair appointed by BIS and
institutions to consider whether adopting new eighteen members who reflect the diversity of
ways of working and/or reviewing the extent the undergraduate and postgraduate population.
to which guidance is being implemented in Members participated in four full Forum events
practice, could lead to further improvement in and three subgroup meetings to develop
this area. recommendations and proposals to improve the
student experience.
recommendations for Government,
and/or for areas which require further This year, we chose to focus on: teaching
consideration and collaboration at a and learning (including technology-enhanced
national strategic level learning); employability; the particular needs of
postgraduate, mature and part-time and disabled
We have drawn upon our expertise in what it students; and accommodation. A summary
is like to study in higher education to develop of our visions, suggestions for how individual
recommendations that we believe require universities and colleges can support us and
attention at a national strategic level. Some recommendations for consideration at national
recommendations may involve a shift in current policy and strategy level is outlined overleaf.
policy or practice, or new collaborations at
a national level. However, others may more
appropriately require careful consideration
of how effectively or how widely existing
programmes of work or specific initiatives are
being implemented. As students we are not
experts in the workings of the sector, and we
both value and respect the sector’s autonomy.
Executive
Summary 05 National Student Forum – Annual Report
Vision – what does it look like when we’re How can universities and colleges support
Teaching getting teaching and learning right? teaching and learning?
and Learning As I a student, I acknowledge that I am an active We would like to see all universities and colleges:
partner in the learning process, but I also expect
professionalise teaching and learning within
to find that:
the institution
my learning experience is a high priority for
personalise and differentiate approaches to
the university
take account of disabilities, learning difficulties
my learning is, where possible, personalised to and learning styles
my needs
increase flexibility in course structures and
my courses are flexible yet structured, modes of study
and transferable
develop a cross-institutional strategy to
essential resources are easy to access and enable students to co-design and manage
readily available their learning
assessment and feedback are used to help undertake regular reviews of course content
me learn and material to ensure currency and relevance
(where appropriate to subject matter)
I can be an active partner to my university or
college in the design and management of my ensure a university-wide focus on assessment
own education for, not just of, learning
my university/college encourages me to review adequacy and accessibility of study
view my education as more than just resources for number and range of students
subject knowledge
monitor and formally record students’
broader learning
Issues and challenges
The Forum raised a series of challenges and In particular, we identified some of the current
issues relating to teaching and learning that barriers to the growth of technology-enhanced
are faced by students at some institutions. learning: unequal digital access; unequal digital
These included: a lack of clarity and advance literacy for both students and staff; the lack of
information about what learning at university is time and lack of support for tutors to develop the
like; insufficient emphasis on the development necessary skills and restrictive university policies
of lecturers’ pedagogical skills; too much and practices at some institutions.
assessment of learning rather than for learning;
insufficient course innovation; confusion around We would like to see all universities and
transferability of credit between institutions; colleges: implement a systematic policy to
lack of sufficient choice in mode of study; and enhance traditional teaching methods with new
insufficient opportunity to collaborate, engage technologies; leverage technology to provide
with and co-design the learning experience. innovative methods of assessment and feedback;
implement a dedicated support programme
for students and lecturers to develop skills
and confidence in using technology; support
whole campus access to ICT resources for all
students; and promote the university or college’s
technology-enhanced learning approaches and
resources to prospective students.
Recommendations
1. Incentivise universities to achieve excellence in
teaching and learning, as well as research
2. Encourage greater transferability (of credits)
between institutions
3. Increase flexibility and innovation in course
structures and modes of delivery
4. Develop a national strategy to increase
students’ access to academic texts through
electronic means
Forum members draw on their experience as students to identify the areas that they believe are
genuinely important for students, to define a reasonable student expectation in these areas and,
where appropriate, to make specific recommendations for improvement.
This report summarises the Forum’s views on the topics selected for detailed consideration this year:
teaching and learning, including technology-enhanced learning; employability, including information,
Report purpose, advice and guidance services, and work placements; postgraduate study; the continuing issues faced
by disabled and mature and part-time students; and student accommodation. It makes suggestions
approach about how the Forum feels the student experience could be improved in these areas.
and targets for
recommendations This report is aimed at policymakers, sector organisations and universities and colleges,* but takes a
differentiated approach for each audience, in acknowledgement of the sector’s autonomy. For each
topic, it outlines the rationale for focusing on the subject, along with a summary of common issues
faced by students. It also sets out:
BIS Ministers have committed to providing a formal response to the Forum’s recommendations.
Where the focus of recommendations falls outside the immediate scope of BIS policy, the Forum
invites sector organisations to consider how these relate to existing or potential activity and welcomes
suggestions from the sector as to how these might best be achieved. NSF members look forward
Report to engaging with sector organisations over the course of next year to explore how these might be
outcomes approached in more detail.
Finally, the Forum encourages individual universities and colleges to listen, reflect and consider any
action that it might be appropriate to take at an institutional level to improve the student experience in
the featured areas. It also actively encourages individual universities to feed back to the Forum on any
specific actions, improvements or initiatives that are taken in response to this report.†
*
We use the terms ‘universities’ and ‘universities and colleges’
interchangeably to refer all institutions providing higher education
†
Contact details for the NSF can be found on its website at
http://www.nationalstudentforum.com
initiate discussion on areas of potential policy interest for the NSF or for Government
produce an annual report for Ministers’ attention and comment which includes recommendations
for Government
Membership
During the academic year 08-09, the NSF had eighteen members, initially appointed for a
two-year period, plus a Chair. Members were drawn from nominations put forward by the following
stakeholder bodies, working together with BIS to ensure that the Forum is reasonably reflective
of the diversity of the higher education student population: National Union of Students (NUS);
National Postgraduate Committee (NPC); Mature Students’ Union (MSU); Open University Students’
Association (OUSA); Skill: the Bureau for Students with Disabilities (Skill); British Council
(to nominate international students).
The NSF sets its own agenda. Meetings are regularly attended by Ministers, policymakers and
partner organisations, in accordance with the topic selected by the Forum. In addition, the NSF
contributed to the BIS consultation on the Future of Higher Education.
Teaching
and
supporting
learning
Why focus All of our thinking about teaching and learning is We were joined in our discussions by Professor
underpinned by the fundamental belief that, as Paul Ramsden (Chief Executive of the Higher
on students, we are active partners in the learning Education Academy, HE Academy), who was
teaching process and have a critical responsibility in terms invited by John Denham (then Secretary of State
and of achieving success. However, we believe this of the Department for Innovation, Universities
success can only be achieved in partnership with and Skills) to set out key issues for teaching
supporting excellent teaching at the universities and colleges and the student experience over the next ten
learning? at which we are studying. to fifteen years to feed into the debate on the
Future of HE. Professor Ramsden highlighted the
We are aware that in recent years many increasing requirement for the academic world to
universities and colleges have placed an recognise that curriculum and teaching methods
increased emphasis on raising the standard of must continue to evolve to meet the broader
teaching within their institutions. We welcome needs of the economy and society and to ensure
this focus, and are delighted to share examples currency beyond the university walls.
of such practice in this report. Each year, the
National Student Survey (NSS) reports on various As Forum members, we welcome the steps
aspects of teaching and supporting learning, already being undertaken by many individual
ranging from academic support to assessment institutions and the HE Academy to encourage
and feedback. The 2008-09 survey found that and promote professional development in
83% of students are satisfied with their teaching in higher education. We have learned
teaching on their course. We acknowledge that that these include such initiatives as:
this is a strong overall satisfaction rate and
commend those institutions who are achieving paid teaching fellowships (e.g. Greenwich
well in this area. University and Kings College London, as just
two examples)
Nevertheless, the student juries (held in early
explicit links between achievement in teaching
2008) revealed that students were facing
and learning* and the criteria for promotion
a range of issues relating to teaching and
from lecturer to senior lecturer (for example,
supporting learning and ranked this as a priority
Roehampton University)
area to be addressed in future. This chimes with
many of our own experiences in this area. The Associate, Fellow and Senior Fellow status in
NSS also shows that satisfaction rates with recognition of an individual’s commitment to
assessment and feedback remain comparatively enhancing the student experience
low at 65% and that the general satisfaction (HE Academy)
rate varies considerably from one university to
the HE Academy’s annual high profile fellowship
another. We were therefore keen to create a
awards scheme for excellent teaching†
vision of what it would look like if all universities
and colleges provided outstanding teaching to However, the student juries, our own experiences,
support their students to learn to the best of their and the NSS results indicated to us that
individual abilities. although many institutions are already achieving
excellence in teaching and learning, others
have further to go, and we cannot afford to be
complacent if we are to ensure that all students
achieve as well as they might.
*
Linked to the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching
†
HE Academy National Teaching Fellowship Scheme, in which fifty
academics receive a £10,000 grant in recognition of individual
excellence in teaching
A Vision for
Teaching and
Learning:
how will we know if we are
getting it right?
I can be an active partner to my
my learning experience is a high
university or college in the design and
priority for the university
management of my own education
I am encouraged to develop an
awareness of my strengths and
my courses are flexible yet
structured, and transferable weaknesses with regard to my
research and study skills and
how these are applicable to
different contexts of my life
I can study for a degree in any I am encouraged to develop
mode (e.g. full-time, part-time, ‘soft’ skills in the classroom
distance) and be successful
that translate into broader
I can access lectures in a variety of interpersonal skills for life
formats e.g. podcasts after lectures
my course offers the right balance I have a clear acknowledgement
between structure and flexibility of my experiences and
of modules, appropriate to the achievements, including non-
particular subject I am studying academic achievements, e.g.
I can transfer credit between
my time spent volunteering is
universities and colleges for credited towards my degree
appropriate degrees
What are Lack of clarity and advance information Insufficient emphasis on the
some of the about what learning at university is like development of pedagogical skills
issues faced In some cases – especially for those of us While most of us are happy with our lecturers,
by students? coming straight from environments or cultures we have experienced some lecturers who are not
where study has been more guided – we aren’t very good teachers – in some cases, this may
always sufficiently aware of the difference simply be because there has not been sufficient
between studying at school or college, and emphasis on learning how to teach effectively.
studying at university level. This can lead to a For example, many of us have experienced the
mismatch of expectations amongst students benefits of personalised learning approaches at
from different backgrounds about how we will be schools and colleges, during which we became
expected to learn. aware that we all learn in different ways. We
acknowledge that, in a lecture hall, it is not
I had no idea that I’d end up having to structure going to be possible to personalise approaches
so much of my time myself! And that I’d have to for every individual student. However, lecturers
take so much more responsibility for my learning. can maximise the potential for positive learning
It’s not that I mind, but it would have been useful outcomes by varying their teaching methodology
to know beforehand so that I didn’t waste so and delivery to take account of a range of
much of my time during the first year.” learning styles in any given session.
(NSF member)
Most of my lecturers have been great, but one
We would like to see all higher education or two seem really ill-at-ease in front of a class.
institutions working closely with colleges, schools (NSF member)
and applicants coming via both traditional
and non-traditional routes to make sure that Academic support is rarely geared to individual
prospective and new students are clear about the requirements or factors, such as learning style,
level of personal responsibility we need to take disability, gender, age, mode of study, religion or
for our learning. This is especially important for culture. (NSF member)
those of us who face particular difficulties with
time management (e.g. students with dyspraxia,
or autism), as we need to understand the
implications for how we will need to work.
It is often incredibly difficult to get hold of my In whatever way is most appropriate for the
lecturers. Some fail to show up at their own subject area, we would like to see regular course
appointed office hours and can be impossible to content reviews that are influenced by the latest
reach by phone or email. (NSF member) developments in the field, and universities and
colleges building stronger links with relevant
We are aware that lecturer availability will vary, professional bodies and employers to ensure
but each department should work with current course relevance to, and currency with, the
students to establish appropriate levels of wider world.2
contact time with academic staff, as appropriate
to the nature of the course. In addition to course content, it is also important
that teachers are innovative in their teaching
Clear communication of lecturer availability delivery. Adopting varied teaching methodology
for course X at institution Y to prospective ensures that students with all learning styles
students would not only ensure that we make an are catered for and it enables disabled students
informed decision when choosing a course, but to access material more readily. We address
would provide guidance for lecturers and tutors this issue further in our section on technology-
as to the university’s expectations on student enhanced learning.
responsiveness (e.g. standard expectations of
response times and procedures).
e
urse relevanc
2
Improving co
and currency ted the Postgra
duate
d Brighton crea fication
s of Sussex an recognised quali
The Universitie g De sig n to develop a wo uld like to
Le ar nin wh o
Certificate in e- lea rning de signers and those
ing e-
for both practis
ustry in future.
work in the ind p
between a grou
h a su cc es sf ul collaboration an d
It was developed
throug s of Sussex
d the universitie ed out
d employers an ds analysis carri
of Brighton-base co m pr eh en sive training -nee
ng a
Brighton, followi e-Learning Allia
nce.
of the Brighton
1
Emb with members
olved with the
teac edding ics an d industry experts
were closely inv
th e programme
hing a Both ac ad em
content, ensurin
g th at
and commi development of th e co urse
al em ployers. The qu
alific ation is now
an industry
The lear tm would meet the
need s of loc
nies and acts as
U
com niversity
preh
ning ent to recognised by lea ding e-learning compa
again o
ensiv f East in C benchmark.
e L
teac st the U CPD p ondon PD /www.sussex.
ac.uk/
op
h K r
focu ing and Profes ogramm erates a in fo rm at io n, go to: http:/
s on supp sion e, spe For further
teac o al
hing rting lea Standar cifically 2-2-5.html
For a r ds ma informatics/1-
nd le n
f
ac.u urther i arnin ing in HE Framew pped
k/lt n g . , with ork
a/p forma a sp for
rofe tion ecifi
ssio , c
nal/ go to: h
fram ttp:/
ewo /
rk.h www.u
tm el.
*
As outlined in the UK Professional Standards Framework for
teaching and supporting learning in higher education
†
See, for example, section 7 of the QAA’s Code of Practice
(programme design, approval, monitoring and review).
xibility
3
Increasing fle
bility
and transfera
dents
me to enable stu
ive rs ity se t up the 2plus2 sche ion s to ga in a
The Open Un evious qualificat
o m ay no t ne cessarily have pr ed to study pa rt time from
wh e expect
ce. Students ar fer to their chos
en
degree in scien th th e OU , and then trans rs ity) to
ar s wi Un ive
home for two ye (e.g. Loughborou
gh
ll-time university
participating fu s of th eir de gr ee.
al two year
complete the fin
ound their
re their study ar
se allow s stu dents to structu OU , co ur se materials are
The cour s first two years at the ey study
de nt y an d th
work. During stu or electronicall
r deliver ed to students’ doors resid en tia l co urse is a
eithe one week
eir own time. A rial support lesso
ns
the course in th Stud en ts can attend tuto (H on s) in
de nt s. BS c
requisite for stu ents gain a *
The HE Credit Framework for England was developed by the QAA,
e se lf- he lp stu dy groups. Stud er un ive rs ity. UUK and Guild HE
or organis ll-time partn
ysics from the fu
Chemistry or Ph
dback
4
Improving fee sty 2008 iden
tified that
Feedback Amne
The Great N US
ld be:
feedback shou 5
Enabling s
ing, not of learn
ing
ment attempt) tudents to
• used for learn e to infor m our next assess learning ex co-design th
• timely (provid
ed in tim
perience eir
process advance
• a continuous been laid out in The Uni versity of Sa
ed to clear cr iteria that have 2009-15, w lford’s Learni
ng, Teaching
• relat as written w and Enhanc
mind to enco ith ac
• constructive urage a partn ademic, support services ement Strate
gy,
ar designing an ership approach and student
• legible and cle d managing be twee n the Univers au diences in
aminations include: the learning
• provided on ex nt needs experience. ity and its le
arners in
le an d suited to stude feedback
Elements of
student colla
• be fle xib
en t and peer-to-peer boration
lf assessm • A strong re
• inclusive of se lationship with
all students were invited the Students’
• accessible to ine. to input into Union (SU) e.
ource.nusonl strategies an new institutio g.
nal learning an the Union Executive
rm at io n go to: http://res sty_
d policies an
d a d teaching re
For further in
fo ne assurance ha major review
-Feedback_Am ndbook is un of the Univers lated
esource/2008 derway, guid ity’s academ
co.uk/media/r the institution,
including studen ed by a group of stak ic quality
r1.pdf • Internal pr
Briefing_Pape ogramme re ts represente
d by th
eholders from
across
reflection on view procedur e SU
the results of es were amen
the student vo th e National S de d in 20 08/09 to incl
ice with curric tudent Surve ude
Increasingly, ulum design y to more clos
Schools are and quality as ely align
‘unpick’ the N ho lding informal su ra
SS scores of discussions w nce processes.
improvemen the previous ith current st
t and strength cohort to bette udents to
• A research s to build upon r understand
project into th areas for
although it w e student ex
ill be led and perience is in
(Academic) w conducted by the design ph
ill provide su the Students’ ase and,
the University pport and gu Union, the P
and actions ar idance. The re VC
• Faculty sp ising from th sults are to be
ecific progra e research w shared with
its PDP sche m mes, e.g. one ill be jointly ag
me while othe faculty is focu reed
representatio rs are expand ssing on stre
n on learning ing mentorin ngthening
and teaching g systems an
committees d student
Teaching and
Learning focus:
technology-
enhanced learning
Technology We identified some of the current barriers to the unequal digital literacy
-enhanced growth of technology-enhanced learning:
We are aware of ‘skills gaps’ – for example where
learning: unequal digital access8 certain groups of students (e.g. mature students
the pitfalls who may be returning to study after a long time,
Access to IT resources can vary enormously
or students from poorer backgrounds, who may
between universities. This includes, but is not
not have had the same access to technologies
limited to, unequal access to:
as other students) do not have the same levels
laptops and desktop computers of familiarity with technology. Mature students
high speed internet can be bewildered by the growth of a new
‘technological language’ that has developed in
large inboxes their absence from study and can feel intimidated
software and lack confidence when faced with the double
challenge of renewing their skills and having to
online journals (due to a university’s learn a new language.
subscriptions policy – this is particularly
significant to postgraduate and I don’t know how to write a wiki or use twitter – I
research students) don’t even really know what these things are!
(NSF Member)
assistive technologies
In addition, the financial constraints and For all of us it is becoming more and more
circumstances of individual students can standard that some element of our learning takes
sometimes mean that access to technological place online, so we all need to learn how to learn
resources is not as readily available as necessary. online or in a technological environment.
The NUS has successfully negotiated discounts
for all students to purchase certain software I’m trying to re-skill and I don’t want the
and technological apparatus but, particularly for technology to get in the way of my learning
some courses where there is a heavy reliance on (NSF Member)
technology, some students from disadvantaged
socio-economic backgrounds still struggle to gain
the access they need.
ICT
ual access to
8
Promoting eq
rticularly
udents, and pa
ity aim s to en sure that all st ss to In fo rmation
rs nds, have acce
The Open Unive ge d ba ck gr ou op po rtunity
those from disa
dvanta ware and the
tio n Te ch no logy (ICT) hard m m en ce th ei r study. It
and Communica de ve lo pm en t before they co th ey be gin their
skills as
for appropriate ag e of su pp ort to students
sive pack
provides a cohe
ie s, in clu di ng :
stud to purchase
able students
on of fin an cia l support to en st ar t da te
• early provisi le to the course ovide
near as possib e centres to pr
computers as lo ca l lib ra rie s and U K onlin
ects with
• 10 pilot proj ICT hardware OU, how to
sed access to is used in the
community ba ba sic ad vic e about how ICT
oviding ing
• a booklet pr to access train the
ware and how e gap between
purchase hard ills m od ul e to br id ge th
hi ch ar e not ICT
T sk (w
• an accredite
d IC
or y le ve l “O pe nings” courses
duct curriculum
University’s intro of the Level 1
d other areas
dependent) an bedding Inclusiv
e
K. (2 00 8) De veloping and Em : Higher
d Bridger, mmary York
From May, H. an r Education: Su
y an d Pr ac tic e within Highe
Polic
emy
Education Acad
*
As identified in the CIBER report on the Information Behaviour of
the Researcher of the Future, commissioned by JISC and the British
Library in 2008.
13
Supp
o
acce rting wh
p surgery ssibi o
a free lapto lity to le-camp
11 Running ery to off
er The U
n
IT us
top Surg ms a Lap ble learn iversity of
ics runs ff with pro ing p
olicy Northum
ol of Econom d e nts and sta ptops and prom b
don Sc h o nce to s tu
wned la otes ria IT and
The Lon hands-on assista om personally-o • pro
viding acces t
sibility echnolog
dvi c e and so u rce s fr wirele the e to all y-e
a E re stude nhanced
ng to LS ss b ntirec
connecti ces. • en
abling roadband ampus wit nts b
y:
e vi t h acc
mobile d vironmen Citrix all s
(remo tudents to ess to
w ith : s to L S E’s IT en over a te ac
he lp lapto p oval cess access th
ery offers -owned n or rem • run net
The surg on of personally n, disinfectio ning work and software e learning
e cti c tio ano the for
• Conn are’ prote ardware learn
ing p nline foru Internet) delivering rtal using
po
and ‘malw nosing h
• Virus ic data retrieval b lem s and diag ortal m to
su
applic
ations
m m pro For fu pport
• Acade n operating syste r learn
eo sues ac.uk ther inform ing o
• A dvic devices is /s a n the
b le m s to p an d mobile ac.uk d/central/ tion, go to
p ro on la p ervices/ /infok lib ht
ral advice .ac.uk/its case- it rary
studie s/learning /nora/; ht www.nort
tp://
• Gene w w w.lse
t http:// s/nor -spac tp:/ hu
n, contac thum e -desig /www.jisc mbria.
rth e r in formatio bria n/mo infon
For fu rgery/ re/ et.
laptopsu
remote/
29
9NNational
ationall S
Student
tu
udent Forum
Forum – A
Annual
nnual R
Reportt
30 National Student Forum – Annual Report
NSF We have drawn upon our expertise in what it indicators of success. As students we are not
recommendations is like to study in higher education to develop experts in the workings of the sector, and we
for Teaching and recommendations that we believe require both value and respect the sector’s autonomy.
attention at a national strategic level. Some We therefore urge Government and/or national
Learning
recommendations may involve a shift in current sector organisations as appropriate to consider
policy or practice, or new collaborations at how these recommendations might be taken
a national level. However, others may more forward most effectively – either individually or
appropriately require careful consideration of how collaboratively. We invite stakeholders to view our
effectively or how widely existing programmes of work as an invitation to engage in an ongoing
work or specific initiatives are being implemented. dialogue to bring about improvement for all
students in future.
We have indicated what it would mean for
students in our day to day lives if these
recommendations were successfully
implemented, along with some potential
What would this mean for students? How might we measure success?
1. Incentivise universities to achieve See vision for Teaching and More lecturers are achieving a
excellence in teaching and Learning on pages 14-15 formal teaching qualification
learning, as well as research
All universities and colleges have
increased emphasis on teaching
within their CPD requirements,
and offer progression routes that
are clearly linked to achievement
in teaching and learning
There are fewer variations
between institutions in the NSS
survey for satisfaction in teaching
NSS results for satisfaction with
assessment and feedback have
risen significantly
2. Encourage greater transferability I am aware that I can transfer There are high levels of awareness
(of credits) between institutions from one university or college to amongst students that transferring
another easily between courses and between
institutions is both possible and
relatively simple
More universities and colleges
accept applicable credit transfer
from another university
3. Increase flexibility and innovation I am able to complete my degree Most universities offer choice of
in course structures and modes in a variety of modes to suit my mode of study on most courses
of delivery needs, e.g. full-time, part-time,
modular or distance Time limits for completing
degrees are only imposed where
In most cases I am able take a absolutely necessary (e.g. where
break from my studies and return course currency is critical e.g.
to it at a later stage, even if that medicine, law etc)
is much later
4. Develop a national strategy It is easy for me to access the E-books are in widespread use,
to increase students’ access academic texts I need, regardless particularly by distance learners
to academic texts through of what type of student I am, or and disabled students
electronic means where I am studying from
Disabled students routinely have
access to software that ensures
academic texts are accessible
In the longer term, all texts
are simultaneously published
electronically at the time of initial
hard copy publication
Improving
our
employability
Why focus on The whole process should be viewed as a The NSF, AGCAS and NCWE are all in
partnership with shared responsibility for success. agreement that students have a responsibility to
employability? (NSF member) be proactive in developing employability skills and
seeking advice and opportunities. Ultimately, we
Although many of us choose to go to university recognise that as students we are responsible for
simply to study a subject we enjoy and to ensuring we are employable and that we need to
reap the wider benefits of a positive university start thinking about what comes after university
experience, we are increasingly aware of the or college sooner rather than later, if we are to
role that higher education plays in improving our develop the right skills and make the most of the
employability. Our report last year touched briefly opportunities on offer during our time in higher
on this topic, providing suggestions for further education. For example, we should consider
development in this area for both Government participating in a range of extra curricular
and universities and colleges. However, in activities and/or working part-time while we
recognition of the current economic situation in study or over the summer. We also need to be
which we are emerging into a depressed, and realistic about the opportunities that are likely to
therefore more competitive, job market, we were be available to us in any particular career, given
particularly keen to explore what more could be our individual level of ability and
done to improve students’ work-related skills and current experience.
knowledge, so that we are in the best possible
position when seeking employment. However, as forum members, we feel that there
is still more that some universities and colleges
In our discussions, we were joined by: could do to ensure all students can access
the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory adequate support for their endeavours. We
Service (AGCAS), the professional association believe that:
for higher education careers practitioners who
a clear university or college-wide
lead, support and provide resources to facilitate
employability strategy
the delivery of careers services for HE and
related sectors an impartial, well-informed, well-resourced,
high profile careers service
the National Council for Work Experience
(NCWE), which works to support the high quality, well-structured work
development of quality and standards across placement programmes
all forms of work experience and to encourage
more employers to provide work placements are critical factors in increasing our employability,
and in this section we share our suggestions for
the ways in which universities and colleges can
address these three priority areas, along with
specific recommendations for consideration at a
national level to incentivise and monitor progress
on this front.
NSF vision
for improving
employability:
how will we know if we are
getting it right?
I feel optimistic about
my career prospects
Of course, we acknowledge that many universities are increased resources for, and the promotion
already undertaking work in this area. However, the level of the use of, personal development plans to
of emphasis given to developing employability varies explicitly outline and monitor the transferable
significantly from one institution to the next, and we skills developed through both academic and
would like to see all universities and colleges commit non-academic experiences
to an internal review of current initiatives and develop
a strategy to cohere these and to foster employability
across the institution.
the provision of optional modules/classes that reputation they need within the university or
consider how the skills/knowledge developed college to carry out their important role for
during study/placements translate across into all students
the work environment (e.g. a course in ‘How to
Market Yourself to Employers’) – further work with student unions to raise
awareness of the nature and breadth of the
an employer mentoring scheme to enable careers services on offer
current students to develop a greater
understanding of the business world15 – reciprocal agreements with other universities
and colleges so that students can access
a curriculum offer that: local career information when home over
the summer
– covers not only academic subject
knowledge, but also includes the opportunity – rigorous internal monitoring of the
for students to engage with alumni or implementation of the existing AGCAS code
employers working in a related field of practice by university and college
careers services
– is co-developed with employers and
experts in the field to ensure contemporary – an explicit commitment to support students
relevance (where subject-appropriate) with a wide range of specific needs e.g.
disabled students, international students,
systematic integration of the university or
mature students, students of varying
college careers service into students’ everyday
academic abilities
lives e.g. helping them to find summer or part-
time jobs, short or long term work placements, a sufficiently resourced, high quality work
‘summer camps,’ giving advice on module placement programme (see Priority 3 for
choices which may impact upon future career further detail)
paths etc (see Priority 2 for further detail)
adequate levels of resourcing, awareness-
raising and monitoring of careers services
to ensure that they have the high profile
file and
nding
ro ving understa
15 Imp ills
tr an sferable sk
of
ployer
as an Em
u sk in U niversity h tra nsl ate “ability
Anglia R , to help to ntified
S ch em e ru rs ide
ite
Mentoring bility.” Graduate rec ng graduates
ya mo
into emplo ness awareness a gress. To
o f busi r to pro
a la ck b a rr ie loyer
e ing a significant y d evi se d the Emp ts
as b u n ive rs it r st ud en
address th
is, the cond yea
S ch em e to give se n d m e n to red
a
Mentoring ity to be supported al
un profession
the opport s by a graduate or r h elps the
o n th e nto
for six m s. Each m onal
o-one basi enhance their pers the
on a one-t ate a n d d in g of
student to
evalu understan ive free
d eve lo p a greater a ll re c e
skills and tors
. The men nd instruc
tion.
ess world training a
real busin e nto rin g
skin m
Anglia Ru
d
rs guid ance an
e m
16 Integrat
ing care the mainstrea
nto
ability i (CCMS)
is
employ er Management Skills
career advi ce
the
are
tre for C sely with ctice at
o f R e a ding Cen tre that works clo thinking and pra rriculum-
ive rs ity n t c e n rw a rd H E cu
The Un velopme move fo g role in r the
res ea rc h and de d ep a rt ments to ersity’s pioneerin and resources fo
a c a d e m ic th e U n iv lea rn in g
nd a her ation,
service a d to develop furt are inform
Reading
an
c a tio n, and to sh S: for
reers ed
u
The CCM resource
based ca e whole sector. e P h D , an online luding a
benefit o
f th eyond th rning, inc nly at
es (e.g. B management lea ot o
ve o n line resourc ’ care e r h ich is used n
e ve lo ps innovati s u pp o rt students s tin atio ns® – w
• D ) to D e for
earchers ing site – eir ideas
PhD Res arning and teach niversities ff to develop th e
ew le the r u rs sta tsid
major n many o nd caree in and ou
but also in ademic a tives with
Reading cts which allow ac bility-related initia
proje and emp
loya E
• Funds careers- -based H
innovative m c e s of c urriculum
ulu and prac
ti graduate
the curric the development affecting
a rc h e s in c lud ing factors
• Rese ducation ate emplo
yment,
n within H
E
ers
careers e earch into gradu f careers educatio interested in care ts
p o rts re s im p a ct o all th o s e a nd even
• Sup oices, an
d the
ng space
s for
roups, tra
ining,
career ch l and virtual meeti unities, working g
es rea omm
• Provid , through online c
a tio n /ccms/
educ .rdg.ac.uk
se e h ttp://www
on
informati
For more
n em p loyment g interna
tional
K
gai a ch to supportin wledge of the U
ro ents’ kno t likely to
sive app rehen e stud rs mos
s a comp ly’ (e.g. th ing the employe s for
n iv e rsity employ ssing both ‘supp .g . kn o w in iste r’s Initiative ce
ru n el U , a d dre m a n d ’ (e rim e M c e lle n
B bility
employa dness for it) and
‘de m the P and ex
student a re n u e d s u pport fro h fund innovation l students to
nd pre p Conti s whic ationa
market a recruits). and other bodie itiatives for intern
e p t in te rnational 1 a n d 2 h . K ey in
ac c atio n proa c
nal Educ ering ap
Internatio ence of its pione
e vi d es
provide list servic r expectations
a re : d e ve lo p specia re c ru ite to
date ultant to rket and eo case studies
f a C are ers Cons graduate job ma d in g vid
intment
o the UK age inclu ng,
• Appo outlining s™ careers pack , marketi
p re -e n try DVD stin a tio n s u c h a s finance
• A the De practice sectors
dule for ure and e in key nced
• A mo p lace cult e xperienc gy-enha
highligh t w o rk
jo b s a n d w o rk
bin in g technolo
directory
of me com
• A web gineering program rs
e n e n t P re paration fro m employe eas
IT an d Employm ns and e-suppo rt d in overs
A P o stg ra d u a te
e s e ss io pa n ie s intereste sk ills
• face to fa
c
Fair g com d other
learning, rnational Careers introducin e, languages an
l In te in e s s in ..’ events no w le dg iew s kills and
a s k
• Annu nin g ‘Doing b
u
a n p ro vide local pro ve th eir interv
-w in oc im cific
• Award n to students wh e for students to untry spe
expansio eb-based packag orldwide o m p re h ensive co
ue w yers w luding c
• A uniq icate with emplo ages inc
m m u n al s tu de nt web p
co ation
sed intern
• Focus ent information
employm
Samantha had been looking forward to her work Once on placement Samantha was paid the
placement since she applied for her course. minimum wage. In addition she was only
The course prospectus provided a rich insight required to pay half of her university fees
into what it would be like because it included during this placement year as the university
stories from former students who had completed acknowledged that during work placement years,
similar placements. It also told her when and how its responsibility as a learning provider is greatly
she would receive further information about it reduced. In recognition of the fees she continued
during her course. to pay, she was given structured support from
the university, including a half-day’s lecture back
Throughout her second year she was well on campus per week. Samantha was assigned
prepared for the year-long placement, which to a mentor at the placement who looked after
took place in her third year. Over the course of everything she did academically, and she was
the year, in different modules, she was taught given a ‘go-to person’ to speak to if she had any
the knowledge and skills she would need for her non-academic needs or concerns. Her mentor
placement. She was also in regular contact with assigned her clear objectives detailing what she
her university’s placement unit, which matched needed to accomplish and learn. These were
her skill set with a placement provider to find created in conjunction with her university, and
her the perfect employer. Additionally, she was they continued to check in on her to ensure she
assured that if this process had not worked, she was progressing. She was given a logbook with a
would have been able to request a change of list of tasks she needed to accomplish, a box for
placement. A specialist support unit supported her to fill in the date where she achieved this, and
one of her fellow students, Paul, who has a then a place for a signature from her mentor. She
disability. They worked hard behind the scenes to was regularly assessed and given clear feedback
ensure he too got a valuable placement, ensuring so that she was able to improve. What was really
that his particular support requirements were met great though, was that they were flexible with this
and that the placement provider was aware of learning. There was some box ticking involved,
how best to support him to create a placement but in the areas in which she was clearly already
that was mutually beneficial to both Paul and competent they didn’t make her continue the
the employer. programme. Instead, they designed a bespoke
programme to stretch her.
What would this mean for students? How could we measure success?
5. Incentivise placement providers See vision for an ideal work Government is supporting/
to increase the number of, placement on pages 34-35 sponsoring the NCWE Awards
and improve the quality of, for quality work placements
placements on offer.
Government is subsidising a
number of SMEs to take part
in the Quality Assurance Mark
Schemes
More employers are adhering to
a framework for the quality and
standards of work placements
(or have achieved the NCWE
Quality Assurance Mark)
Increased numbers of employers,
including SMEs and large
corporations, are offering
internships
6. Identify ways in which university I am satisfied that I have been All universities offer dedicated,
careers services can be better able to access satisfactory tailored support for disabled,
supported to meet the needs of specialist careers guidance that international, postgraduate
particular student groups takes account of my personal and other student groups with
(e.g. disabled students, situation specialist needs – and this is
international students and widely acknowledged to be the
postgraduate students) case by these particular
student groups
Improving
the
postgraduate
student
experience
Why focus on There are more, and different, students entering We acknowledge that the majority of students
postgraduate study than ever before – and we have a very positive experience of postgraduate
postgraduate really need to think about what that means, what study, with PRES and PTES figures for 2009
students? changes it might necessitate. (NSF member) indicating that more than four out of five
postgraduate students felt that their experience
Increasing numbers of us are choosing to enter had met or exceeded their expectations. We
postgraduate study, and we are motivated by also acknowledge that the experiences and
a range of reasons. Both the Postgraduate expectations of students on, for example, a
Research Experience Survey (PRES) and the taught Masters programme may be very different
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) to those undertaking a PhD. However, in our view,
results from 2009* demonstrated that these there are three major challenges that need to be
motivations range from interest for their subject addressed if all postgraduate students are going
to improving employment prospects. to be able to achieve to their potential. These
challenges are:
In a job market in which having a degree
is increasingly becoming the norm, and in an infrastructure that has historically
an economic climate in which employment predominantly focused on the needs of
opportunities are reduced in the short term, many undergraduates (ranging from funding structures
of us are continuing with our studies in the hope to IAG and university support services)
that the situation will have improved by the time
we complete them – or returning to If the nation wants more highly skilled postgrads
re-skill in a different sector. This link with coming out of universities, they need to do more
improving employability is demonstrated by to support and finance that. (NSF member)
increasing interest in options such as the
perceived patchiness of academic support for
New Route PhDs, which combine a structured
postgraduates – both between universities,
programme of training in discipline-specific and
and even between different departments in the
transferable professional skills (for example,
same university
teaching and management) with traditional
research. We have been pleased to see the At the moment it’s too much of a lottery. It’s
Government recognise the importance of brilliant at some places, and poor in others.
postgraduate study and we welcome the review (NSF member)
of postgraduate education that was announced
by Lord Peter Mandelson in July 2009. academic and social isolation, due to the lack
of sufficiently developed support networks
We need to encourage current and former
postgrads to form a community to support each
other – often those who are going through it, or
have recently been though it, are the best placed
to help (NSF member)
*
We recognise that not all universities choose to participate in PRES
and PTES and so these results only demonstrate findings from the
82 universities that took part in 2009. We use these results as a
general indication of the feelings of English postgraduate students
today. 34% of PRES respondents and 45% of PTES respondents
were motivated by subject interest; 50% of PTES respondents
were motivated by employment prospects, with 32% of PRES
respondents wanting to progress in academic careers.
A vision for
a positive
postgraduate
experience:
where are we trying to get to?
I feel reasonably confident I am
making the right choice about
my course because:
ice on
19 providing adv
ers at a
research care
l
national leve nsideratio
n
or ting c o
20 supp n
Vitae provides ca
reer information
and
doctorates fu tur e ca reers at a
ose starting ou t on of
guidance for th al level
institution
lping
researchers, he
and experienced cruitm en t pr ocesses
vigate re
researchers na lon g term. ng
reers over the ity of Readi
and manage ca , go to ww w.vitae.ac.uk dthe ph d’ is a Univers ts and humanities
mation ‘Beyon pport ar
For further infor at aims to su in their future career
s.
initiative th se ar cher s s of
e re reer
postgraduat udes profiles of the ca
Its website
incl
om a va riety of fields,
searchers fr of careers
previous re and videos
ht-pro vo ki ng articles rm ation available at
thoug rs. Further info
ad viso
and skills .uk
dthephd.co
www.beyon
*
See www.prospects.ac.uk for detail
†
QAA descriptors are provided as part of the Framework for Higher
Education Qualifications www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/
fheq/EWNI/default.asp
“Recently I went to my department to ask if I could have a copy of our postgraduate handbook.
They didn’t seem to know how I could access it and sent me to the faculty office, which sent me
to the academic registry, which sent me to the careers advice people. It transpires that we don’t
have one.
Eventually, they printed off a 26-page “Higher degrees by research” booklet which has info
about how long a PhD thesis should be, how to bind it and footnote it etc and supervisory info
which appears to be taken from the QAA Code of Practice, but that’s all. There’s nothing about
social/cultural aspects of the university, or the union or any kind of orientation; no information
at all beyond supervision and how to submit your thesis – there didn’t seem to be anything at
all for Postgraduate Researchers. Most of the students I know weren’t given a handbook.”
(NSF member) See NSF suggested content for handbooks on p.58.
*
In concurrence with PRES 2008 results, in which 84.4% of
respondents were satisfied with supervisor skill and knowledge.
†
Approximately one in four (according to PRES 2008) and just under
one in three (according to PTES 2008)
social isolation
Research work can be isolating (especially in
certain subjects, such as arts and humanities),
and there can be a lack of peer networking and
social opportunities for postgraduates.
*
www.jstor.org/
*
Postgraduate Research Experience Survey and
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey
ort for
ities and improving supp
23increasing opp
ortun
teach
ostgradua tes who wish to
p sential part of hing as an es
am regards teac t this:
, Un iversity of Nottingh ch stu dents. To suppor
ho ol of En gli sh St ud ies
lop m en t fo r all its re se ar
ide fu nd ing (equivalent
The Sc ng and career deve (P GT F), which prov
ec ific tra ini llo ws hip s
subject-sp ate Teaching Fe s each year.
ated Postgradu for 1-2 student raduate teachin
g
• It has a dedic ) an d te ac hin g opportunities nd ing ) to apply for underg
AH RC fund ing nd ed or se lf-fu
to dents (fu
all research stu office hours.
• It encourages registration onwa
rds. g, holidays and
from their se co nd ye ar of
ar e pa id fo r pr eparation, markin g on co re level 1 and
hin
stg radu at e pa rt-time teachers lly co nt rib ut e to seminar teac ed ar e offered the
• Po e teachers initia nc
du at e pa rt- tim se an d wh en suitably experie ac hin g fellowships
• Postgra
lat ed to th eir research experti tu rin g ex pe rie nce. Those on te em ber
2 modules re ment and lec by a full-time m
po rtunit y to ga in course develop pe rie nc e, wh ich is overseen
op el 3 ex
given limited lev teaching by
are occasionally pects of module
of staff. ar e su pp or te d through all as d by a tra ini ng programme
ra du at e pa rt time teachers d te ac hin g on the module an en cin g teaching, all
• Po stg an m m
nc ed sta ff alr eady convening m en t Un it (P DU). Before co al Lo ok at Core
experie nal Develop ions – ‘A Practic
rsity’s Professio U training sess
run by the Unive e fo llo wi ng PD
quired to take th
students are re sessment’. hing. S/he mee
ts with all
g Sk ills ’ an d ‘Marking and As r of part-time teac e them a chance
Teachin ed co -o rd ina to ic ye ar to giv
has an appoint nin g of the academ and questions.
In
• The School at th e be gin y co nc er ns
stg ra du at e pa rt-time teachers ex pe cta tio ns an d to discuss an
hin g als o he lps identify
po t out of part-time teac
each other, to se e co-ordinator t and mentoring
to get to know de nts’ supervisors, th s an additional contac
wi th stu d pr ov ide
consultation ses needed an
ant training cour r postgraduate
part-
any further relev ac ad em ic ye ar. is undertaken fo
ro ug ho ut th e of Te ac hin g) SE T go to the
point th dent Evaluation g. Reports on
nised SET (Stu on their teachin stem of peer
University-orga rece ive fe ed ba ck e Sc ho ol’s sy
d ensures they issues raised. Th and
time teachers an llows up on any going feedback
te ac hin g co -o rdinator who fo ov ide s th e op portunity for on
part-time additionally pr
module review
observation and g.
achin
discussion of te
*
In line with the QAA’s code of practice precept 12
Contents
ersity in formation e they an d when are
they open?
G eneral univ acilities who are th ey, where ar
services/f nt services:
University About stude
y course?
1. w d o I re gister for m
H o it open? ional
and when is ents, internat
2 . Where is th e lib ra ry
pp or t fo r disabled stud
su
ation about
3. I find inform
Where can
c?
4. students, et
k?
my first wee y studies?
a s to ra l at ca n I ex pect during ar e as o ther than m societies
Social/ P W h life in ion,
in university ations, the student un
et involved ci
5. How can I g ring, PG studies asso
e
(e.g. volunte
6. s) nt space?
and activitie ra d u at e /m ature stude
st g
I find the po
Where can
guidance?
7. re e rs advice and g my studie
s?
it y n I ac ce ss genera l ca
jo b o p p o rt unities durin
il How ca cific
Employab n about spe
8. re ca n I fi n d informatio iversity)
Whe eu n
bs within th d optional,
9. (including jo m p u ls o ry, hidden an
ude co
ly to be (incl
n ce th e co st s of study like work etc)?
Student F
ina What are ce; field
nce attendan
10. e.g. confere
led to?
g am I entit
What fundin
n
11.
-specific informatio
nt/course
Departme as o n ab ly ex p e ct from my su
pervisor?
tr ai n in g can I reason
ably expect
I re d
Academic What can support, ad
vice an
12. as to ra l an d academic
What p
partment? to me? (e.g
. IT,
13. from my de s are available
s co u rs e
l skill
What generat, communications)
e m e n d output?
14. m an ag
m e in te rm s of study an
ected o f n?
What is exp s submissio
ir e m e n ts for my thesi
15. e requ
What are th d against?
e m e w ill I be assesse
16. sch
What mark
ns?
17. or mitigatio
o I ap p ly fo r extensions
l How d ng?
Procedura ing goes wro
18. sh o u ld I d o if someth
What
19. publish?
jo u rn al s d o my faculty
General What
tment?
20. in the depar to me?
Who’s who iti e s are available
p o rt u n
21. rking op
What netwo ?
open to me
22. rences are
What confe
23.
dbook 02
Student’s Han
Improving the
experience
of mature
and part-time
students
Why focus We can see that the landscape of higher Much of what we suggest below may seem
education is changing. Rising costs of higher obvious, and most institutions are already
on mature education and the desire to improve our beginning to adapt their practice and provision to
and employability in a competitive job market are some extent. However, our key message is that
part-time leading to increasing numbers of us choosing to the need to adapt is urgent – and the extent of
study part-time whilst continuing to work/bring the adaptation is potentially radical. The question
students? up children and/or return to study at a later stage “How can we adapt what we already do to
in life. better meet the needs of a changing student
population?” may take us some way towards
We are already in a situation in which the improving the experiences of mature and part-
proportion of ‘traditional’ students (who enter time students. However, we may all do better to
higher education at eighteen, and study full- ask ourselves “If we set out to design a higher
time) is decreasing, while universities that cater education system to meet the current and future
specifically for the needs of mature and part-time needs of students from scratch, what would be
students have seen a rapid increase in demand different – and how quickly can we get there?”
for their courses. We were therefore keen to
examine, not only the shift in practice that might Our approach
need to take place within individual universities,
We piloted an approach in which we invited
but the entire shift in culture required of a system
guest students with first hand experience of the
in which those who historically have been viewed
issues facing mature and part-time students to
as ‘the exception’ are rapidly becoming ‘the rule’.
participate in our work on this topic. We were
In our view, universities can benefit enormously also joined in our discussions by Tricia King,
from increasing numbers of older or part-time Pro-Vice-Master of the Student Experience at
students, through the creation of a more inclusive Birkbeck University (which has a large number
and culturally diverse university experience. of both mature and part-time students) and
Some universities are already leveraging these Lesley Rollason, Head of Policy and Planning,
benefits, and have made significant changes Staffordshire University and co-author
to their traditional ways of working in order to (with Christine King) of Part Time Study in
attract and support these student groups – and Higher Education:*
we commend this. However, at other institutions,
In discussing these two student groups alongside
according to both the student jurors and Forum
each other, we are not suggesting that all of
members, their experience is not always as
the issues faced by part-time students are
positive as it might be.
completely interchangeable with those of mature
students. However, there is often an overlap in
terms of the students themselves (i.e. many part-
time students also happen to be mature), and
also in the problems that arise for them due to
the lack of flexibility in current funding structures,
and institutional systems and processes.
*
commissioned by Government to feed into its Future of HE
Review (2008, ongoing), http://www.dius.gov.uk/higher_education/
shape_and_structure/he_debate/~/media/publications/P/part_time_
studies_and_he_131008
*
For example, the current funding structure means that Birkbeck,
University of London receives funding as if it were an HEI educating
just over 7000 full time students – when in fact it actually educates
19,000 part-time students. There is a part time funding premium
but it does not come close to covering the costs when all 19000
students need to attend open evenings, use the application and
enrolment facilities, access the library, use student support services,
attend induction etc
In the meantime, we outline below ten steps that 7. Consider offering specific ‘study
universities and colleges can take to improve their overall counselling’ sessions for students who
offer to mature and part-time students. are struggling to cope with competing
study, work and life pressures
dents to return
24 preparing stu
to learning
Certificate
Step Up to HE 25
sh ire Un ive rs ity’s free-to-all uld like to return prov
Stafford le who wo
is designed spec
ifically for peop it an d what it will idin
unsure how to
go abou t
1: Enhancing
g fle
to study but are modules. Module
Birk
beck xibl
entail. It co ns ist s of tw o
te-ta kin g, preparing for resp
onsiv Evening
e ch
, inc lud es classes on no
the library and
IT ildc
yo ur sk ills
d se m ina rs, research skills
, us ing
an d Gu ida nce
• is
open
e be
caus
Nurs
ery is are
lecture s an bject Taste rs a at
ttend e it:
th pa rticu
s. Module 2: Su of learning lec e time
support material sample a range and larly
e Fu ture , allow s stu de nts to
ic dis cip lines across the 9pm tures: in when m flexib
le an
for th em read ; and the e ost B
s fro m a se lection of acad va rie ty of learning • is ing we do ve irk d
perspect ive
ts ex plore and experience
a
dents are open eks esn’t clo nings be beck stu
en stu se fo tw d
University. Stud ches. Througho
ut the module from to an r half een 5.3 ents
ac hin g ap pr oa gu ida nc e ab out future case 2 years nusually
u term 0pm
and te for advice and s to o
nit ies d are • o la r
also offered op po rtu
ned a personal
tu to r an pera they will 10 year rge age
dy ro ut es . St udents are assig s. Th e co ur se is worth 30 pay tes a ‘pa accept s (thoug range o
stu ssador fo c
th Student Amba for level 1 of a
degree y
on a r the se as you hildren o in exce children
h f
able to meet wi fying students n s g f p ,
credit points at
lev el 0, qu ali
e attendance ov
er eithe r a six ‘regu ight by sions th o’ syste up to 1 tional
requires full tim lar’, ‘o nigh eir c m: p 2 ye
Th e co ur se ccas tb hild are ars
course .
riod. iona asis. It is ren act nts only )
l’ or u
or eight week pe ‘eme therefo ally atte
rgen re n
cy’ u availab d,
sers le to
.
We recommend that universities and colleges Specifically targeted information from student
include the following content for mature and part- unions about:
time students in a ‘know before you go’ pack:
– the range of services available to all
The average number of mature and part-time students, but which highlight those which
students studying on the course (broken down may be of particular interest or relevance to
by demographic into number of 21 – 25 year mature and part-time students
olds and number of 25+ year olds)
– how to get more involved in student life
Transparent information about the application (if they wish) – either socially or politically
process including how non-traditional – any activities and social networks aimed
qualifications are assessed for credit towards directly at them, or which attract a diverse
meeting application criteria range of students in which they won’t
feel isolated
How to access support during the
application process (e.g. help with getting Childcare costs and levels of provision
academic references)
Information on ‘returning to learning’ courses
Information on any funding options and (e.g. to support the development of specific IT
entitlements that may be available (including and study skills)
discretionary grants, childcare funding etc)
Information on the university’s support and
Early notification of the timetable, both ‘buddying’ policies for mature and/or
numbers of hours and specific day/s and times part-time students
students will be expected to attend university
The university policy on work extensions,
An indication of likely peaks in activity and deferral of course completion, and re-takes
assessment deadlines during the course
What would this mean for students? How could we measure success?
2. Encourage greater transferability I am aware that I can transfer High levels of awareness
(of credits) between institutions from one university or college to amongst students that
(also featured in Teaching and another easily transferring between courses
Learning, Chapter 1) and between institutions is both
possible and relatively simple
More universities and colleges
accept applicable credit transfer
from another university
3. Increase flexibility and innovation I am able to complete my degree Most universities offer choice of
in course structures and modes in a variety of modes to suit my mode of study on most courses
of delivery needs, e.g. full-time, part-time,
Time limits for completing
(also featured in Teaching and modular or distance
degrees are only imposed where
Learning, Chapter 1)
In most cases I am able take a absolutely necessary (e.g. where
break from my studies and return course currency is critical e.g.
to it at a later stage, even if that medicine, law etc)
is much later
10. Review student finance policy As a part-time student I can There is a significant increase
to provide comparative funding afford to go to university, in part-time student applications
for part-time students and the regardless of my age or and admissions
universities that teach them other circumstances
Increasing numbers of part-time
I can access student loans, students are completing
council tax exemptions and their degrees
wider benefits packages that are
More universities have access
comparable to full-time students
to the equivalent of full-time
funding and are offering a much
wider range of part-time courses
Part-time study is no longer
considered to be ‘the exception’
11. Review ELQ policy, especially I am able to return to university The UK’s skills needs are being
for courses that address to re-train in a skills-shortage effectively met because more
specific skills shortages subject even if I already have people are choosing to go back
a degree to university or college (to study
shortage subjects in particular)
Improving the
experience
of disabled
students
Improving As a Forum, we recognise that any discussion We welcome this focus, and look forward to the
surrounding disabled students sits within the improvements that these initiatives will hopefully
the broader context of equality and diversity within bring. However, we don’t think that there is room
experience higher education. We certainly don’t consider for complacency, and there is still more to be
of disabled disability to be more important than any other done to ensure that all disabled students have a
aspect of equality and diversity, and when we positive experience of higher education.
students develop recommendations for key topics we
aim to ensure that our approach is inclusive of With this in mind, and in order to further develop
as wide a range of perspectives as possible. our recommendations from last year in this area,
Nevertheless, having considered issues that were we reviewed some of the persisting issues faced
raised by the student juries and in the light of by disabled students as identified by the Forum’s
some of our own experiences, last year we held a subgroup in 07/08. In summary these comprise:
subgroup to explore some of the issues that are
1. The need for more tailored information
particular to this group of students in more detail.
before entry into higher education
The subgroup developed draft proposals for about:
improving the experience of disabled students, what learning support is available
for further consideration and refinement by
how accessible different aspects of university
the full Forum this year. We invited the Equality
life are
Challenge Unit to work alongside us to identify
a number of ways in which universities can 2. Insufficient awareness of the specialist
support disabled students, along with several financial support available
recommendations for Government and 3. Misconceptions and stigma that
partner organisations. unwittingly perpetuate discrimination,
such as:
We were delighted to learn that much is already
happening in the sector to improve the disabled well-intentioned assumption e.g. some
student experience. Some examples both at a staff assume that all disabled students will
national and institutional level include: automatically have issues with time management
subconscious discrimination e.g. when
Government published a statistical report on disclosure of a disability sometimes leads
disabled students in higher education in May to subsequent problems in obtaining work
2009, exploring both the issues faced by, and placements or affects expectations of
the progression of, disabled students* performance during assessment processes
HE Academy convened a year long summit 4. Academic disadvantage arising from:
programme on inclusive learning and teaching in
association with the ECU and Equality Forward uneven access to electronic textbooks and
in 2009. It is completing research on the the inconsistent provision of transcription and
experiences of ten institutions developing and interpretation services
embedding inclusive policy and practice. It has insufficient training and awareness for teaching
published a series of resource bulletins focusing staff about accessible approaches
on inclusive learning and teaching. With the ECU, patchy use of personal development plans
it is in the process of updating its current version (PDPs), which can be a particularly powerful
of Disability Legislation: Practical Guidance for support tool for disabled students when
Academics, which highlights inclusive practice implemented effectively
when teaching disabled students
5. Non-academic challenges arising from
ECU (funded by HEFCE) has commissioned insufficiently accessible:
the Inclusive campus: practical guidance
on sensory accessibility research project orientation processes
to improve general accessibility and the accommodation
accessibility of student services and teaching social activities and opportunities
environments for sensory-impaired students.
Findings will be available later in 2009 A more comprehensive overview of our
discussions last year can be found in our 2008
Aimhigher North London (now Aimhigher report†. We outline below our suggestions for the
WECAN) is continuing with its successful ways in which universities can help to support
This-Ability ambassador programme in which disabled students, along with some examples
disabled students and recent graduates work of institutions who are already implementing
with disabled school pupils to encourage them excellent initiatives to do so.
to enter higher education
Anglia Ruskin University has developed a *
http://www.dius.gov.uk/~/media/publications/D/DIUS_RR_09_06
blended learning module on inclusive practice †
http://www.dius.gov.uk/higher_education/students/student_
(accredited by the Staff and Educational listening_programme/national_student_forum
Development Association), which will shortly be
available to academic and support staff
ility
ising awareness of disab
26 ra
h awareness
issues throug s into CPD fo
r
y awarene s
weeks 27embedding dis
abilit
staff
on is one of man
y universities
aching and management
Un ive rs ity of the Arts Lond s th roug h disability te
Th e
of disability issue for all staff ining
s aw ar en es s
, University thof e Arts y awareness tra
that raise
s. In March 2009 ess of art ity of Li ve rp oo l offers disabilit stu de nt s and those
awareness week Disability Week to raise awaren Example 1: The
Univers
os e wh o have contact wi
th
y and equality
on he ld its fir st of disab led artists rsity, particular ly th
y training in div
er sit
Lond
y an d the experiences d by within the unive ies. It of fe rs ha lf da
ent programme.
The course
informed by dis ab ilit
the access iss ue s fa ce ent responsibilit sional developm
well as explore eness of with managem inu ing pr of es of dis ab ility and the
stu de nt s, as ra ising aw ar rt of its cont and awareness
an d
. The week focu
sed on d practices as pa de rs ta nd ing nt s wh o are
arts institutions ental health an hance staff’s un ing with stude
d hid de n dis ab ilities such as m inc lus ive?’ is designed to en ive rs ity an d staff when work od _P ra ct ice .htm for
both visible an Arts of the Un ls_and_ Go
adline ‘Are the responsibilities /hr/equality/Too
ened with a he luding the scre
ening tp://www.liv.ac.uk
dyslexia and op d by 17 ev en ts, inc
ng, a disabled. See ht
s fo llo we en es s tra ini
debate. It wa , disability awar more information
. fund
lks , exhib itions
d careers deve
lop m ent from HEFCE to
of films, artist ta d consultation an ity of Yo rk ob tained £14,000 eg ra te d eq uality
student as se m bly , an
am ple 2: In 20 04 the Univers m en t pr oject s which have int lud ed:
dents. Ex l develop ing. Projects inc
for disabled stu e departmenta aching and learn
and support nin cu lum an d te
&D) into curri
and diversity (E monitor
y department to
Ap pr ais al Gr oup in the biolog lum . Th e de partment has
Staff Peer thin the curricu
• setting up a d div er sit y wi D eq ua lity and
g equality an ormation on E&
issues concernin r’s ha nd bo ok to include inf hin g or pa sto ral role.
rviso a te ac
produced a supe r individuals with staff to support
and guidance fo ol for academic
diversity training e- ba se d lea rn ing to
ing .
t of an lea rn
• the developm
en teaching and
y aw aren es s in the context of
disabilit
2. Review and, where necessary, revise widely promote the benefits of using personal
enrolment and induction procedures development plans (PDPs), especially for
to ensure that they are inclusive disabled students; ensure facilities and
and tailored to meet the needs of resources are available to support students to
make PDPs when they choose to; and ensure
disabled students
new e-versions of PDPs are accessible for
work with current disabled students to evaluate disabled students
how effectively current guidance* on enrolment
and induction for disabled students is 4. Improve awareness of disability
being implemented issues amongst academic staff
3. Raise awareness of disability issues ensure staff with pastoral responsibilities are
within universities and colleges able to signpost students to relevant people
amongst the wider student community and organisations
establish disability awareness activities within ensure all staff are trained in accessible
universities and colleges e.g. encourage halls approaches to teaching and learning as part of
of residences to run specific events26 standard training and development processes27
5. Ensure that institutional feedback
embed equality and diversity training into the
mechanisms capture data for
student curriculum and/or offer certificate
short courses on equality and diversity disabled students, and use to
improve future provision
We encourage individual institutions and/or sector organisations to consider how the needs of this
student group might be met more effectively. For example:
*
Currently (September 09) Precept 7, section 3 of the QAA Code of
Practice
4. Develop a national strategy It is easy for me to access the E-books are in widespread use,
to increase students’ access academic texts I need, regardless particularly by distance learners
to academic texts through of what type of student I am and disabled students
electronic means
Disabled students routinely have
(also featured in Teaching and
access to software that ensures
Learning, Chapter 1)
academic texts are accessible
In the longer term, all texts
are simultaneously published
electronically at the time of initial
hard copy publication
6. Identify ways in which university I am satisfied that I have been All university IAG services offer
careers services can be better able to access satisfactory dedicated, tailored support for
supported to meet the needs of specialist careers guidance disabled students – and this is
particular student groups (e.g. widely acknowledged to be the
disabled students) case by these students
(also featured in Employability,
Chapter 2)
12. Improve disability awareness I am able to access course Disability awareness training
training in universities and teaching and materials, is standard in all initial lecturer
colleges regardless of my disability training
I am confident my tutor can Disability awareness events are
support me standard at all universities
and colleges (e.g. during
I find my university/college
induction weeks)
experience inclusive and equal,
and do not face active or Lecturers tailor their teaching to
inadvertent discrimination ensure it is accessible by
from my peers or university/ all students
college staff
Disabled students report
consistently high levels of
satisfaction with all aspects of
their higher education experience
Student
Accommodation
Why focus As a Forum, our criteria for developing our work We learned that these organisations, along with
programme includes a commitment to focusing the Accreditation Network UK (ANUK, a network
on student on the areas which are of high importance to, and that promotes accreditation in private rented
accommodation? which are relatively widely experienced by, students residential accommodation), Unipol (who work to
but also on which we can potentially make improve training, standards and professionalism
the most impact. We are aware that, although in student housing) and CUBO (College and
accommodation issues can cause high levels of University Business Officers who administer
stress and anxiety for students, any discussion the UUK Code of Practice and manage student
around improving the situation is necessarily accommodation across the sector) are already
complex, since so many factors that are external to working to:
the higher education system are involved e.g. the
general cost of living, geographical variations and develop, revise and join up existing
property market forces. accommodation Codes of Practice*
*
Current Codes of Practice include the UUK Code of Practice (which caters for predominantly university owned and administered
accommodation) and the ANUK Code of Practice (which caters predominantly for privately provided student accommodation).
http://www.anuk.org.uk/LargeCode/Introduction.asp
NSF vision
for student
accommodation:
where are we trying to get to?
We have outlined our vision of where we are trying to get to – and
invite sector organisations to engage with us in further dialogue to
explore how we can get there.
I feel like an included, valued
and respected member of my
community because:
*
NUS, UUK, Accommodation Costs Survey 2006/07, p.6,
e areas
diversifying th
31
30 invo
ents live l
proc ving stu
in which stud
ess den
of advertising ts in
makes a point York the
Unipol in Leeds ical S
neig t John plan
outside of the typ nts
accommodation has seen stu de their
hbou
rs, st
Univ
ersit ning
which
‘student’ areas, t into other areas.
n u
four ewest h dents, a worked
y
read ou
starting to sp s a n
Awa hortliste lls of re d the cit losely w
c
r d s y co it
could d for Na scheme idence. uncil h develo
tio T p
the h demons nal Ou s in the 2 he acco in the pla ers,
ut
nts abo
alls a trate tstan 00 mmo n ning
exce d 9 d
s tu d e ption re home that it: w ing New Times H ation wa of
ring
mpowe
al fa ; imp on th R esid ig her s on
cilitie ro e e
an d e It ha s for ved ene approv ence be Educatio of
32 Informin
g s be disa r a c
n issues
g y l o a u n
o guidance stud en a bled e f
stud fficiency ose for it
th se
od ati e advice and e e
deve nts, com odel of
m
ents ; and
accomm
en siv who
mpreh n onlin lope mun succ . provid m
s offer co ctor. They have a nt, direc rs it
tor o all play y police ss – wit
e
n service e e about re
private s
ed
modatio ring advic f fac ing a team h loc
niversity’s accom mmodation in the sive website offe ation, A Rough ilities n int s, lo al re
lla m U a cc o he n u blic , Coli eg ca sid
Sheffield
H a find th eir
nd a com
pre
ition, the ir p n Pa ral part l counc ents, th
tude n ts wishing to ccommodation a nsing e tc. In add rkin) . (Yo il
rk S lors and e
for s red a ion lice t Joh
of registe nd televis n Un the
database osit protection, a s ivers
de p clud e ity’s
tenancy unting, in ccommodation
House h a
Guide to nd private sector rea
fi s to live y given a
• how to convenient place a contract m m o da tion in an
ost ing acc o the
• the m ts of sign ifferent types of students
quiremen rd y
er to give on on a univerrssitity
• legal re le rents to pay fo r problems. e k of S e p tem b
m oda ti
n a b oth e tw e co m
• reaso pairs and g Week in the firs ing for ac
g with re ile search rt
• dealin n a House huntin d information wh re p o
ru an arents
They also to access advice eet the P
po rtu n ity ted in th e NUS M
op h
ur. Highlig
minibus to
*
e.g. the Housing Act 2004, the UUK and ANUK Codes of Practice
†
Highlighted in the NUS Meet the Parents report
ontract
33 providing a c
ice
checking serv
am,
s including Durh
Many universitie rm ingham
ndlords
d Bi
rmingham an
Nottingham, Bi
City universities
prov ide free co ntract
, students
34 accrediting la
basis
checking service
s. At Nottingham
wn with traine d ad visors on an annual
are able to sit do es and jargo n to make
claus
who will explain e agreement credited lists of
private
e happy with th Unipol update ac
sure students ar s and No ttin gh am
before signing. landlords in Leed be
landlords ask to
annually. Private in orde r to fill their
ipol
accredited by Un wa nt to live in
e students
houses becaus using . Un ipol also
ed ho
Unipol-accredit
checking service
has a contract
for students.
35
prev
enti
ng ‘
Som pan
to ‘p
e un
scru ic re
a p
there nic rent’ ulous la
ntin
will b at the ndlord g’
ha ve to e n e s n e
pay othing a d of the ncourag
high vaila Chris e pro
Durh e r tha b t s
am S n ma le by the mas ter pective
urgin rket s m te
t
g stu udents’ value pring – , sugges nants
befo de n Unio p ric or th ting
r t n run es. at th th
first e the en s not to s an ey w at
y d ru ill
• e ear stud of the C sh to sig annual
ncou ents hris nu ‘Rela
befo rages s in each tmas te p for ac x' camp
• in r e tu d c o rm co aig
form friendsh ents no llege ea . Throug mmodat n
of ac s stude ips are p t to settle rly each h p rese ion
c n n
value ommod ts that in roperly c into ho Decemb tations t
d at eme u e o
• d
istrib prices ion, so th urham
D nted sehold g r, the SU
utes ere is there roup :
guid no n is s
es to
hous eed often a
to pa surp
e hu y ove lus
nting r ma
and rket
‘livin
g ou
t’
Staff
Staff who are:
culturally sensitive, honest, helpful – and
sympathetic when things go wrong
factually aware of the entitlements of different
types of students (e.g. disabled students)
knowledgeable about different welfare
agencies and contacts
familiar with the area and transportation links
and very knowledgeable about private landlords
and properties
operating within the guidance laid out in the
ECU Handbook for Student Accommodation
Providers: Support and Guidance for Equality
and Diversity (2009)
*
For further information on these Codes of Practice, see UUK:
http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/PolicyAndResearch/Guidance/
AccommodationCodeofPractice/Pages/default.aspx
Or ANUK:
http://www.anuk.org.uk/LargeCode/Introduction.asp
* UD K D P
3KRHEH
-RHO
/ LV D
7V K H UL Q J
, VP D LO
$ D UR Q
P D U\
5 RVH
90 National Student Forum – Annual Report
Samina Sabir Armineh Soorenian
My name is Samina Sabir and I am 21 years of I am a disabled, postgraduate, mature
age. I recently completed a degree in Education international student, and have been in UK
with Early Childhood Studies at Roehampton Higher Education for the last eight years.
University and I am enrolled to undertake a In this period, I have been interested in and
PGCE this year at Anglia Ruskin University. campaigned for various issues relating to
Over my three years at Roehampton, I took disabled, postgraduate and international students.
an active role in working in the student union My involvement in organizations such as the
working on many campaigns as Welfare Officer, National Postgraduate Committee and the British
and Cultural and Diversity Officer. I was also a Council has strengthened these efforts. The
teacher of Roehampton Opportunity Accreditation PhD research that I am conducting at present,
Development whereby I taught key skills to investigates disabled international students’
other students, I was trained by NUS to do this. experiences. Through this research, I hope to
Furthermore, I was a student representative identify barriers faced by disabled international
for Early Childhood Studies and a Sport and students, and recommend ways to address these
Wellbeing Ambassador. Due to my commitment difficulties, in order to strive towards an inclusive
and participation at Roehampton I was awarded Higher Education system for ‘all’.
the principal award which is given to one student
every year. From these opportunities I have learnt By participating in the National Students Forum,
many new things and gained valuable experiences. I endeavour to contribute towards and promote
this inclusive educational structure further.
Christopher Sadler
I am a third year student at Birmingham City Wes Streeting
University studying Visual Communications I am President of the National Union of Students,
(Photography) with the Birmingham Institute of an elected position responsible for representing
Art and Design. My interests and hobbies include the interests of more than seven million students
a range of outdoor activities; walking, kayaking in Further and Higher Education across the UK.
and climbing. I am also an active member of the Before taking up my current position in
scouting movement. July 2007, I was NUS’ Vice-President for
Education. Prior to joining the NUS, I served as
Maeve Sherlock President of Cambridge University Students’
I am currently at Durham University doing Union, after graduating with a bachelor’s degree
research for my doctorate on the subject of the in History from Selwyn College. I was a member
interface between Faith and the State in modern of the Burgess Steering Group on Measuring
Britain. Until October 2006, I was Chief Executive and Recording Student Achievement and I am
of the Refugee Council and previous to this, a member of the Delivery Partnership Steering
spent three years as a member of the Council Group on admissions. I am a non-executive
of Economic Advisers in the Treasury on issues director of the Higher Education Academy, the
including child poverty, labour markets and the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service
Third Sector. During the 2007 Spending Review, (UCAS) and Endsleigh Insurance Services. I have
I chaired an Advisory Panel advising ministers on previously served as a non-executive director
the future role of the Third Sector in economic of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator
and social regeneration. Before moving to the for Higher Education and was a member of the
Treasury, I was Chief Executive of the charity One government’s Youth Citizenship Commission,
Parent Families, director of UKCOSA (Council which published its report to the Prime Minister in
of International Education) and President of the June 2009.
National Union of Students.
$ UP LQ HK
& K UL VW RS K HU
0 D H YH
6D P LQ D :H V
91 National Student Forum – Annual Report
Beth Timney Serena Trowbridge
For the past few years I have been at the I am a PhD student at Birmingham City University,
University of Nottingham studying Archaeology, having obtained a Masters from the University
as both an undergraduate and a postgraduate of Birmingham and a BA (Hons) in English
student specialising Osteology and the Iron Literature and Language from King’s College
Age in Britain. Following this, I spent a year as London. My thesis is entitled “Christina Rossetti’s
a Sabbatical Officer at Nottingham’s Students’ Fractured Gothic” and considers the effect on the
Union where I was responsible for representing work of Rossetti of Gothic literature. I am also
the needs and interests of a diverse and growing the editor of the Review of the Pre-Raphaelite
PG community. For the next two years I will, once Society, and I am currently undertaking some
again, be a student as I am starting a MSc in teaching at Birmingham City University. I am a
Occupational Therapy at Teesside University. school governor and take a strong interest in
secondary and higher education. I have been
Steven Thomson involved with the NSF since its inception and am
I am currently at Sheffield Hallam University particularly interested in aspects of learning and
studying towards a degree in Biomedical teaching, and postgraduate issues.
Science. I am 25 years old and have been a
student at Sheffield Hallam University since Kate Wicklow
2001, having previously studied a BSc (hons) I have been the Academic Affairs officer Anglia
Sports Development with Coaching and BSc Ruskin Students’ Union from Sept 07-09. While
(hons) Computing Degree Routes. During my a student at Anglia Ruskin I studied drama with
time at university I have taken an active role in music on the Cambridge campus and was the
university life. I was president of an extremely president of the Anglia Theatre Society (ATS)
popular Students’ Union society (2001 – 2003); in 2005-06. My love of theatre and music has
I have also been deputy chair of the Student meant that I have worked with lots of local
Union’s governing council (URC); and faculty theatre groups both in Cambridgeshire and in
representative, representing students at the my home town of Luton and have performed at
highest level within the university. As well as the Queen Elizabeth Hall and the Royal Albert
my active involvement at university I am also a Hall. As well as representing the views of my
football association referee, officiating semi- own students, I am also heavily involved in the
professional football. campaigning work of NUS including the higher
education funding campaign and helping to
I enjoy keeping fit, socialising, going to the strengthen student representation.
cinema and other leisure activities.
I am delighted to have been the Vice-Chair of
the National Student Forum and have enjoyed
working with such a diverse group of students.
I am proud of our achievements to date.
6W H YH Q
%HW K
6H UH Q D
. DW H
*
The government’s full response can be accessed at
http://www.dius.gov.uk/higher_education/students/student_
listening_programme/national_student_forum/~/media/
publications/R/response_to_national_student_forum_report
the My Application and Offer programme – a With the limited time available to the Forum in
simpler online application process which will mind, it was agreed to:
work out from the student’s individual profile
the steps they will need to take and remove the dedicate time to developing recommendations
necessity to work through lengthy forms for improving the postgraduate experience as a
and guidance priority (see chapter on Postgraduate students)
The Forum was particularly pleased to hear review and refine the disabled student
that the SLC is now actively listening to and draft proposals, and publish the updated
acting upon customer feedback. The Forum will recommendations (see update on Disabled
continue to monitor these developments and the Students). The Forum also agreed to continue
impact they have upon students. to consider all core topics from the perspective
of equality and diversity for all students and to
keep a watching brief as to whether it might be
appropriate to hold further discrete subgroups
in future