1
, 3,002,891 ' ' "
Ce
3,002,891
Patented Oct. 3, 1961
2
completely inadequate for rupturing the cells and re leasing the enzymes from the ?brous tissues of the pine
_
apple stem. However, it has been discovered that the necessary combination of shearing forces and high pres
sure is obtained by passing the stems through a roller
type press such as the sugar cane ,threeroller mill or a Stacomizer mill, or through a screw type press. Such ap
paratus combine the shearing and pressing actions in one operation, but if desired this can be accomplished in two This invention-relates to the production of enzymes 10 operations such as, for example, in the utilization of a and has particular reference to theproduction of an ac hammer mill such as a Rietz disintegrator followed by tive enzyme mixture from the stem juice of the pineapple freezing of the pulp and pressing in a Carver press.
The following table illustrates the effectiveness of the Many workers have prepared proteolytic enzymes from shearing and pressing process of the present invention (A the juice obtained from pineapplefruit. Recent devel 15 and B) as compared to unsatisfactory pressing methods opments in this ?eld include the discovery that the stem (C and D):
of the pineapple plant is a source of enzyme known as
plant.
'
al
is to all outward appearances a rather unlikely commer 1" .ccial source of enzyme. ~ It is ?brous and starchy. The 20
A. Sugar mill press _____________ ._
Ml. Juice
per 100 gms.
M.O.U.1
per Ml. Juice
152
129
Total
M.O.U.l
5, 630
4, 000
37
31
48
46
27
16
1, 300
735
apple stem juice by simple precipitation techniques have unsatisfactory color, solubility, vstability and activity. A primary object of the present invention is, therefore,
to provide a process for the production of an enzyme of
i The raw juice from the presses contains dirt, starch 30 grains, broken cells and ?bers. These are removed by
Still another object of the present invention is, to pro vide a process for the production, in commercial quan tities, of an enzyme mixture having high proteolytic ac
practicable, i.e., in the neighborhood of 3545 F. Ac cordingly, it is preferred to coolthe juice immediately
after extraction from the stems. , ,
The cooled juice is preferably treated with a reducing peroxidase and amylase, and differing substantially from 40 agent to improve and stabilize the proteolytic activity of any protease preparation previously produced. the juice. Also, it has been found that the enzymes A further object of the present invention is to provide ~ made from the juice so treated have better color, activity a novel method for the extraction of an enzyme-rich and keeping qualities than those prepared from untreated juice from the stem of the pineapple, plant. juice extracted in large-scale operations. Treatment with Other objects and advantages of the present invention 45 the reducing agent is not essential, however, especially it'is believed will be readily apparent from the following where the raw materials comprise matur _, peeled stems.
Satisfactory reducing agents include hydrogen sul?de, The process of the present invention provides novel sulfur dioxide, a soluble sul?de salt such as sodium, cal~ means for extraction of the juice from the pineapple stem, cium or ammonium sul?de, sodium sulfhydrate, a bi includes a method of maintaining the activity of the juice 50 sul?te salt and hydroxylamine. high during the processing steps and provides for the re For maximum protection with the reducing agent moval from the juice, by fractional precipitation tech the stem juice should be fresh and should have good niquescertain materials which are undesirable in the ?n activity. After adding the reducing agent the juice
ished product. " , :
1 1 In carrying out the process of the present invention it 55 if it must be held the juice should be chilled to reduce is preferred to use as the raw material mature pineapple the amount of oxidation of both the ,enzymegand added
ofproteases occurs in
Old juice which is low in activity maybe activated central portion, the stele, contains more proteases than by adding the proper amount of reducing agent. How the outer portion, the cortex. The less mature tissues, 60 ever, the activity never reaches that which would have especially those that are still succulent, contain little or been obtained if the same juice had been treated when
nor detectable proteases. _ . , ~
it was fresh.
the roots and the epidermal layer. It'has been found 65 type of reducing agent added and to a lesser extent of the batch of juice activated. Hydrogen sul?de is the that high yields of enzyme-rich juice are obtained by the
easiest reducing agent to use and is preferred. It may
be bubbled into the juice at the receiving tank. Gen~ with high pressures. The classical methodsv of extraction erally because of poor absorption of the gas there is little of enzyme-containing juices from plant, and animal tis~ danger that the juice will be saturated with sul?de. Too 70 sues, such as grinding with sand, homogenizing with a much sul?de, i.e.>concentrations approaching saturation, Waring Blendor or disintegrating inga meat grinder, are reduce the activityrof the juice. salts of sul?de are
3,002,891
used the optimum quantity of sul?de to use must be de termined by trial runs on each batch of stump juice. In general the concentration should be between .005 to .01
molar. .
cipitation and about 60-66% by volume of acetone in the second precipitation. Generally, the proper concentra
tion can be arrived at by ?rst determining how much precipitant is required to remove all of the active enzyme and then utilizing 1A-l/z this amount for the initial pre
If sulfur dioxide is used the pH of the solution must be kept from dropping below about 4. A ?nal pH rang ing between pH 4-5.5 is satisfactory.
cipitation.
ing, air drying, drum drying or spray drying can be activity of the enzyme in stem juice is to bubble hydro gen sul?de gas into the freshly pressed juice. In such 10 used. Freeze drying produces the most satisfactory product. case the pH should be maintained below about 5. At The following speci?c examples are illustrative of the pH values around pH 5.2 or higher the juice quickly
turns black; if the juice is acid no black insoluble sul ?des form.
The enzyme or enzyme mixture may be precipitated or 15 details thereof:
processes of the present invention, but it is to be under stood that the invention is not to be limited to the speci?c
a. The mother stumps of mature ratoon pineapple addition of organic solvents or inorganic salts in such plants were stripped of leaves and then pared to remove quantities that the proteinaceous material becomes in soluble, by dialysis techniques or by simple vacuum 20 the roots and the epidermal layer. The cleaned stumps were then quartered and fed into a three roll experimental evaporation techniques. It has been found, however, that sugar mill prws. The pressed residue was rerun through regardless of the isolation method utilized, it is necessary the mill an additional three times. After the second run, to lower the pH of the juice to within the range 3.5-5.5 water was added to the pulp to increase the ef?ciency of prior to carrying out the step of precipitation of the emzymes from the juice. The pineapple stem juice ex theextraction process. The yield of juice (excluding the water which was added hibits an unusual response to changes in pH. Between
pH 6 and pH 8 the juice rapidly loses proteolytic activity. Above pH 9 the juice maintains its activity reasonably well but rapidly turns dark. However, when the pH
weight of the peeled stumps. The yield of protein was 0.33 pound per 100 pounds of peeled stumps. The total is maintained below 5.5, the activity remains at a high 30 yield of protease, expressed in milk clotting units, was 25,000 units per pound of stump. level. This pH is quite critical, however, as enzymatic b. In some runs, the stumps were merely stripped of destruction rapidly sets in at or slightly above this point. leaves and not pared. The juice from such stumps was It is preferred to observe an upper pH limit of 5.3. As
indicated, a pH of as low as 3.5 may be utilized, but
acceptable for enzyme processing, but was not as con centrated a source of enzyme as that from peeled stumps.
The yield was 15,000 M.C.U./pound of stump. c. For small scale tests, stumps were peeled, frozen, As indicated, any of the commonly used protein pre thawed, and then pressed in a Carver press. Freezing cipitants may be used to precipitate the enzymes from greatly increased the yield of enzyme, but did not equal the juice. Superior results are obtained by utilization of a fractional precipitation technique wherein undesired ma 40 the e?iciency of the sugar mill press. terials are ?rst precipitated and discarded, followed by EXAMPLE 2.-ACETO>NE PRECIPITATION precipitation of the desirable fractions. The only restric tions on the choice of precipitants are (1) that it does To one liter of cold clari?ed stem juice (34 F.) at not denature or inactivate the enzyme unless the enzyme pH 5.0 were added 370 ml. of cold (34 F.) acetone. is capable of regeneration, and (2) that it contributes no 45 The mixture was held for an hour and then the super toxic or other undesirable property to the ?nished product. natant liquor containing the bulk of the desired enzyme It is also desirable that one increment of precipitant will .was syphoned off. The precipitate was freed of desired precipitate the undesired fractions and a second increment mother liquor by centrifuging. This precipitate had poor will precipitate the desirable fractions. color, poor solubility, and contained about one-sixth of Suitable precipitants include low dielectric water-soluble the activity of the ?nal product. After all assays on organic solvents such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, this fraction were run, it was discarded. methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and water soluble salts To the combined supernatants were added 630 ml. of such as ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride. cold acetone. The white precipitate was collected by The exact amount of precipitant which is used to ?rst centrifuging, reslurried in fresh cold acetone, and then precipitate the undesirable fractions in the pineapple stem 55 recovered by centrifuging. The enzyme was left in the juice depends upon several factors such as the protein con centrifuge bottles and dried in a vacuum chamber at centration of the juice, the temperature of the juice, the _ low temperatures. length of the holding time, the pH of the juice and the The yield of enzyme was 9.5 gm. of a white powder
tion of the precipitant, good removal of the undesirable constituents is obtained by the addition of %% volume
of acetone or other precipitant per volume of juice, a
high yield of enzyme being obtained by then adding (after separation of the ?rst precipitate by centrifuging or equivalent method) suf?cient acetone or other precipitant to raise the precipitate concentration in the supernatant
of 40% of the proteolytic activity originally present in the juice. EXAMPLE 2a.-ACETONE PRECIPITATION
65
F. and then clari?ed by settling. The acidity of the clear juice was adjusted to pH 4.3 with dilute sulfuric acid. to about 50% by volume. However, in large scale con To ?ve vliters of juice was added slowly with stirring tinuous operations, using continuous Sharples centrifuges, the same concentrations of acetone produce very poor 70 2500 ml. of cold acetone. The precipitate which formed was removed by centrifuging. To the clear supernatant removal of contaminating material in the ?rst precipita~ were added 3800 ml. of cold acetone. The precipitate tion step and give an extremely low yield of desired en was collected, washed in cold dry acetone and then dried zyme in the second precipitation step. In such con
in a vacuum chamber. The results of this example are tabulated as follows 75 the neighborhood of 30-33% by volume in the ?rst pre
5
Recovery of enzyme from ?ve liters of;
pineapple stem juice ' . waor Total
.
3,009,891
e?
pelt, (Zim
' p _
Prec.
M.C.U.l
17,233
'
Mon...
monium sulfate was added until the speci?c gravity was 1.090. The small amount of precipitate which formed was discarded. To the supernatant additional ammonium sulfate was added until the speci?c gravity of the solution
5.
38.83
a 444
5a---. _________________________ __
1M.O.U.Milk clotting units. ' .
99.61
573,800
, 5,770.
.10
-
EXAMPLE 7._ACTIVATION OF JUICE Cyanide, sul?de, sul?te, and hydroxyl amine were all
tested as activators of the enzyme in stem juice. Of these,
thebest general activator was sul?de.v This was added either as the salt or as hydrogen sul?de gas. To one liter of juice was added 0.5 ml. of >(NH4)2S
clari?ed stemjuice until the speci?c gravity was 1.185. This concentration of salt precipitates practically all of 15 and enough acid to lower the pH to pH 4.5. The proce dure described under Example 2 was then followed; the proteins. 'Ihev precipitate was dissolved in water,
dialyzed to remove the excess salt, and then' ?eeze dried.
Activity Yield of ______________ product _; _______ .._ 4700 M.C.U./gm. 6.5 20.
'
EXAMPLE 8.PILOT PLANT PRODUCTION Stripped pineapple stumps were passed four times
through a three roll sugar mill press. In the second and following passes through the press, water was added to
PRECIPITATION
r
juice at pH 4.0 were added 210 gm. of ammonium sul 25 cedure. The crude juice Was screened to remove the coarse particles. Hydrogen sul?de gas was bled into the fate. The precipitate which formed was removed by cen collected juice to partially saturate it. The pH was ad trifuging. To the supernatant were added 150 gm. of justed to pH 4.8 and then the juice was centrifuged. ammonium sulfate. The precipitate was collected by cen To 50 gallons of juice were added 30 gallons of cold trifuging and then dissolved in water and dialyzed to re move the ammonium sulfate. The enzyme waslrecovered 30 acetone. The precipitate which formed was removed by centifuging in a Sharples centrifuge. This precipitate was from the salt-free solution by acetone precipitation. The results are as follows: I discarded. To the supernatant liquor an additional 35 gallons of acetone was added and the precipitate was col Recovery of enzyme from one literof juice lected in a Sharples centrifuge. The wet precipitate :was . by ammonium sulfate precipitation as dropped into fresh acetone, mix-ed well, and thenrecov ered by settling. The paste was then dried in a vacuum
' ' ' Total Mg Total
Protein
N in Pre- ,
cipitate' '
M.C.U.
in Pre-_
cipitate .
40
210
350 (210+140) ______________ __'____-.____; ______ --
115
1 646
2,210
28, 520
' The enzyme preparations produced by the present in-; vention dilfer from any protease preparation produced
from other sources. The pineapple stem bromelain even
Two liters of freshly pressed juice was placed in a' Web 45.. di?ers from the protease preparation made from the cell dialyzing chamber and dialyzed against running tap fruits of the same plant. In pineapple fruit juice all of water at 3 C. for two {days and then against ?ve gallons the enzymatic activity is ascribable to proteins with an of distilled water for one day. i _ ~acid isoelectric point, no proteins with a basic isoelectric During the dialysis a light grey precipitateappeared. point being detected. Electrophoretic analysis of the prep This was removed and discarded. - '
50
The supernatant was then freeze dried. _
arations made in accordance with the present invention establishes that between 80 and 100% of the total pro teolytic activity is ascribable to the group of colloids
Juice dialized as in Example 5 was fractionated with ammonium sulfate. To one liter of dialyzed juice, am
which have basic isoelectric points. The following table sets forth comparative data relative to the enzymatic activity of the stem bromelain produced by the present process and other proteases:
Pineapple
Papain
Stem Fruit
Flcln
........ -.I--
gin-51000---.
(l-8,000~
2,000-5 000-____
piano-5,200. eg.
50,00080,000.
1,500-2 200.
2,0005,000.
1,000-2, 0_____
.
imsteglg'g?ltsmg' H85
os . s m . .
138"___
________ __
"
N one
None
~
ia-
_.
i28
_
Amylase
Amidasn
Asnm'mrlnn n _.._
Trace.
None
None
None
N mm
None.
_ None,
_
Glummina. a
None
Urease
___
Nnnp
None
Pectlnesterase
___ Tm on
Yes
Yes.
3,002,891"
As used herein and in the appended claims, the term
pineapple stem_ or similar terms is intended to mean the stem or stump of plants of the family Bromeliaceae. '
pineapple plant, the steps comprising cooling the juice, adjusting the pH of the juice to between about 3.5 and
about 5.5, and precipitating and removing the enzymes
from said juice. _
I claim:
'
8. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep aration from the juice obtained from the stem of the
a-ration, thesteps comprising applying to the stems of pineapple plants a shearing force and applying pressure
to the stems to extract therefrom the juice, and separat
pineapple plant, the steps comprising adjusting the pH aration, the steps comprising removing the leaves, roots, 15 of the juice to between about 3.5 and about 5.5, adding sucker stems and epidermal layer from mature pineapple a precipitant to said juice to precipitate the enzymes there plant stems, applying to the stems a shearing force and from, and separating the precipitate from the supernatant. simultaneously applying pressure to the stems to extract 10. In a process for the production of an enzyme therefrom the juice, and separating the juice from the 20' perparation from the juice obtained from the stem of solid materials. . the pineapple plant, the steps comprising adjusting the 3. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep pH of the juice to between about 3.5 and about 5.5, frac aration, the steps comprising applying to the stems of tionally precipitating the enzymes from said juice by the
pineapple plants a shearing force and applying pressure to the stems to extract therefrom the juice, separating the
addition thereto of a ?rst increment of precipitant in
25
Is
juice from the solid materials, adjusting the pH of said juice to between about 3.5 and about 5.5, and precipitat ing and removing the enzymes from said juice.
4. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep
suf?cient amount to precipitate only the impurities from said juice, removing the precipitated impurities from the
supernatant, and then adding a second increment of pre cipitant in su?icient amount to precipitate the enzymes. 11. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep aration, the steps comprising applying to the stems of pineapple plants a shearing force and applying pressure 30 aration from the juice obtained from the stem of the pineapple plant, the steps comprising cooling the juice, to the stems to extract therefrom the juice, separating the
adding a reducing agent to said juice, adjusting the pH of the juice to between about 3.5 and about 5.5, frac
tionally precipitating the enzymes from said juice by the addition thereto of a ?rst increment of precipitant in 35 said juice. sut?cient amount to precipitate only the impurities from 5. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep said juice, removing the precipitated impurities from the aration, the steps comprising applying to the stems of supernatant, and then adding a second increment of pre~ pineapple plants a shearing force and applying pressure cipitant in su?icient amount to precipitate the enzymes. to the stems to extract therefrom the juice, separating the juice from the solid materials, adding a reducing agent to 40 References Cited in the ?le of this patent said juice by bubbling hydrogen sul?de therethrough, cool UNITED STATES PATENTS ing said juice, adjusting the pH of said juice to between about 3.5 and about 5.5, iractionally precipitating the 1,959,750 Wada ________________ _.. May 22, 1934
enzymes from said juice by the addition thereto of a ?rst increment of precipitant in su?icient amount to precipi 4
tate only the impurities rfrom said juice, removing the precipitated impurities from the supernatant, and then
adding a second increment of precipitant in sufficient amount to precipitate the enzymes. 6. In a process for the production of an enzyme prep~ 50 aration from the juice obtained from the stem of the pine
2,095,300 2,676,138
487,840
Wallerstein __________ __ Oct. 12, 1937 Hinkel ______________ __ Apr. 20, 1954
FOREIGN PATENTS
Canada ______________ .._ Nov. 4, 1952
117, published 1924, Norman Rodger, London. Economic Botany, volume 11 (1957), anticled by Heincke and Gortner, pages 225 to 234.