The panel discussion is a valuable, time-tested teaching technique used in classrooms of all types to help students understand the experiences of a particular group of people. But its not effective in every situation. As I moved into the graduate classroom as a teacher of students studying higher education I realized I had a short time (one semester) to introduce and expose my students to the vast array of functions in the area of student affairs/student services. My previous experiences facilitating successful panel discussions led me to believe that a panel would be a good method to use here. It was not. In an effort to create a panel that represented a diversity of functions and practitioners, I ended up with too many panelists and, consequently, an ineffective exercise. As the instructor and panel moderator, one has to manage the questions from the class as well as rein in the excitement and enthusiasm of the panel participants to impart their wisdom. A large panel makes that difficult. I asked the class for feedback following the inclusion of two panel discussions. They loved the panel but wanted to have time to ask more questions and hear more from each person than time allowed. In reflecting upon their feedback, I had an epiphany: speaking directly with others about their work is similar to dating. In dating you have to ask questions to get to know each other and you must have a conversation to learn about the others experiences. Then you can decide whether you want to pursue that person or not! Employing a speed dating model in the classroom in place of a panel can be an effective way for students to learn a variety of perspectives in a short amount of time. This model improves and enhances student engagement and creates learning that is active, collaborative, and fosters learning relationships (Zepke and Leach, 2013). The design should be intentional and well-thought-out. Heres how I set up my speed dating model this semester. Twelve pairs of students asked the same questions to twelve different practitioners, essentially receiving twelve different insights on one particular issue
in the same amount of time used in a traditional panel discussion. In preparation for this event, students were asked to work in pairs to brainstorm questions for the practitioners/panelists. Each pair turned in a list of three-five questions ranked by their specific interests. As the instructor, I assigned one-two questions per pair. I added followup questions to each set so students could delve deeper into the issue if time allowed. Planning the event requires thought and organization. Prior to the actual event, the questions should be sent to the panelists so they can organize their thoughts. The students in the class should be provided with short biographies for each panelist. Having this information prior to the event will allow the students to use their short time (it is a speed event after all) most effectively. Small touches will make a difference. Providing name tags for everyone, water for the panelists, extra paper and writing instruments for taking notes, and encouraging the professionals to pass out business cards will add to the experience for both parties. It is important to pay attention to time during the activity. Each round has to be long enough for the students to gather some information and short enough to get to each panelist during the activity. A stopwatch and a whistle are essential equipment. Most important is to leave time for reflection for the students. At the end of the experience, have students work in their pairs to discuss what they learned. Ask them to synthesize their learning and report to the group their general conclusions. Then, create an opportunity for each student, or pair of students, to share what they learned with the rest of the class. This sharing can be done in class or in a written format, which can be compiled and distributed to the entire class. The feedback in my class following this activity confirmed for me that this format was a richer learning experience than a traditional panel discussion. One student remarked that she felt they were getting a special backstage pass to connect with professionals in their field. The activity allowed for deep learning and sparked inquiry into the profession that carried throughout the semester.
References: Feden, P.D. (2012). Teaching without telling: Contemporary pedagogical theory put into practice. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 23 (2), 5-23. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Whitt, E.J. (2005) Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11 (167). DOI: 10.1177/1469787410379680. Dr. Jacqueline S. Hodes, Assistant Professor and Higher Education/Student Affairs Coordinator, Department of Counselor Education, West Chester University. 2014 Faculty Focus, Magna Publications. All Rights Reserved. Use of any content without permission is strictly prohibited. - See more at: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/usingspeed-dating-model-enhance-learning/#sthash.XtIL1Deb.dpuf
Z
core of the match. You may have to assign pairs more than once before finding just the right match. Next, consider where and how you will recruit or identify younger people to be mentored. A school's guidance office or a community day care or recreation center may be able to work with your program and supply names of students in need of support or guidance. Sometimes you can work with or "adopt" a single elementary, middle, or junior high school in your area and mentor students from that school only. In that case, you may be able to develop strong ongoing relationships with teachers, counselors, and administrators in the school and meet regularly in the school's cafeteria, auditorium, or classrooms. In addition, fewer transportation obstacles will exist when dealing with only one school. Having safe activities in convenient locations is essential. Once you have decided whom you will be mentoring, talk with the parents or guardians of these children to secure their understanding of and commitment to your program. Explain how the mentoring process will work and the potential benefits to the children being mentored. One of the most important steps in creating a mentoring program is training your volunteer mentors. To do so, think about the following questions: What kinds of activities are popular with the students you will be mentoring? How much help should mentors give with schoolwork? What should mentors do if they suspect a problem in the home of a child assigned to them? What do mentors do if a younger person says that he or she has been a victim of crime or has committed a crime? What if the child has experienced abuse or neglect? What can mentors do to influence their young friends' lives in a positive and lasting way? The answers to these questions will help you create a framework for both your training program and your ongoing program activities. Spending time observing or working with an established mentoring program can also give you many good ideas. Considering the complexities of organizing a mentoring program, you may want to work with a school counselor or a community group that can provide initial assistance with management and training. Starting the program with a small number of matched
pairs is another good idea. As your program staff become more experienced and as interest grows, you can increase participation.
academic subjects. They may see significant improvements in academic performance, behavior, or communication skills in the young people they are working with and know that they have played a part in those changes.
The youth being mentored also receive a variety of rewards. These range from such short-term benefits as higher grades and positive feedback from teachers, parents, and friends to such long-term benefits as greater self-confidence, stronger communication skills, and the strength to resist peer pressure -- all of which will make them more likely to become productive, happy adults and assets to their communities.
Evaluating a peer mentoring program requires both short- and long-term perspectives. In the short term, regular check-ins with mentoring pairs and careful monitoring of recruitment and training will help to keep the program on the right path. In the long term, following up with youth who were mentored to determine how the relationship affected them can provide important data on the program's success. In addition, both mentors and the youth being mentored should have a regular opportunity to evaluate the program. Ask them what they find most valuable and what they believe should be changed. Secure such input by administering a survey every month (or week) or by having a hotline or suggestion box available at all times. The following are examples of questions to ask both mentors and the persons being mentored when evaluating your program: How did the peer mentoring program help you? What were some of your favorite activities with the program? What were some of your least favorite activities? How did the program compare with your expectations? How do you think the program could be improved? Would you recommend this program to your peers? What did your mentor do especially well? In what areas did he or she need improvement? In evaluating your peer mentoring program, also consider whether and how it meets the following more general crime prevention goals: Reduces crime or fear of crime. Educates and informs a target audience. Is cost effective. Has a lasting impact. Attracts support and resources. Makes people feel more positive about being a member of their school or community.