VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY Ilona Heckman (lawyer) Individually and As Trustee of The

Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman Revocable Trust Counterclaim & Cross- Complaint Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. : CL 14 - 2185 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Defendant Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint
Where for Defendant Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint, Defendant incorporates all of the RESPONSE TO: Petition to Quash Lis Pendens, for an award of Attorneys Fees and Sanctions and for other Relief. Defendant reserves the right to amend Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint. That Defendant cannot without discovery give an accounting of what Plaintiff is liable to Defendant for the following actions and the actions listed in the RESPONSE TO: Petition to Quash Lis Pendens, for an award of Attorneys Fees and Sanctions and for other Relief

1. Defendant can and will show evidence of Plaintiff being guilty as a lawyer of the
following criminal actions: of being involved in , Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT,
1

Title 18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2172 - Forging, uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

2. That the Judicial system in Virginia has been misled by this attorney.
3. That the Defendant will demand full restitution and exemplary damages due to defendant's willful acts were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless, along with anything else this court or a jury finds for.

4. That Defendant demands a Trial by Jury.

Dated this April 3, 2014 ________________________ Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro Se 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 jwgrenadier@gmail.com 202-368-7178 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing document was delivered on April 3, 2014 to Defendants attorney Ben DiMuro at DiMuroGinsberg PC 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria VA 22314. April 3, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro Se