VERSION:
1.0
REVISION HISTORY
REVISION NUMBER 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 DATE August 15, 2007 COMMENT DoIT Project Management Office Revision
Table o Co!"e!"#
REVISION HISTORY................................................................................................................................... 2 RATIONALE -PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT PROJECT INCEPTION.................................4 RISK EVALUATION FOR THIS PROJECT................................................................................................ 7 INITIAL RISKS IDENTIFIED IN PROJECT CHARTER AND/OR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN......18 ATTACHED PROJECT RISK LOG AFTER INITIAL ASSESSMENT....................................................1 RISK CALCULATION E!AMPLE............................................................................................................. 2" APPENDI! A# A FRAME$ORK FOR PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................21
WHAT I& WE CAN NOT ANSWER YES TO ALL THE (UESTIONS/ OR NO TO WHERE APPROPRIATE.
It is 5uite 3egitimate an, acce.ta03e to state t-at 4our .roject -as not 4et covere, t-e to.ic, or ,ea3t 2it- it sufficient34. T-ere is no target score for t-is assessment. T-e .ur.ose of t-e ,ocument is to ,eve3o. a2areness in t-e steering committee, .roject team an, 2it-in t-e DoIT Project Oversig-t an, "om.3iance team of 2-at t-e .roject nee,s to co.e 2it- as it .rogresses t-roug- its 3ife c4c3e. P3ease use t-e +I& No % P+o01,e a! E23la!a"1o!4 o+ )I Ye#/ 3+o01,e a! e23la!a"1o! 7 0o8 to .rovi,e information as to -o2 an, 2-en t-e .articu3ar item 2i33 0e ,ea3t 2it-.
E0e+6 P+o7e8" 9a# +1#:#. P+o7e8"# a+e !o" 7-,;e, o! "9e !-*be+ o +1#:#/ b-" +a"9e+ o! 9o< "9e6 1,e!"1 6 a!, *a!a;e "9e#e +1#:#.
THE RISK % ISSUE % CHAN'E MANA'EMENT TRIAN'LE
PM'O$1* Ris)* +An uncertain event or con,ition t-at, if it occurs, -as a .ositive or negative effect on a .roject/s o0jectives.7 Issue* +A .oint or matter in 5uestion or ,is.ute, or a .oint or matter t-at is not sett3e, an, is un,er ,iscussion or over 2-ic- t-ere are o..osing vie2s or ,isagreements.7 Both Risks and Issues can significant impact a projects success, and both should be handled in similar ways.
"-ange Management is a Ris) an, Issue Management #trateg4. 'ot- Ris) an, Issue management .rocesses ma4 invo3ve ma)ing c-anges to t-e .roject. "-ange management re,uces .roject ris) 04 .rovi,ing 0ot- au,it trac)ing an, a..ro.riate ,ocumentation.
IMPACT RISK
T-ese 5uestions ,ea3 2it- -o2 even a .roject t-at is successfu3 interna334 mig-t im.act or 0e im.acte, negative34 04 ot-er factors. R1#: Eas t-e .roject 3ea,ers-i. rea, an, .3anne, for com.3iance 2itt-e DoIT Project Oversig-t Memoran,um an, Project "ertification Memoran,umF Eave a33 t-e cost E23la!a"1o! "om.3iance 2it- 0otis re5uire,G non6 com.3iance can im.act certification an, continuation of t-e .roject. Rela"e, Do8-*e!"a"1o! 9""3:==<<<.,o1".#"a"e.!*.-#=3+o7e8".9"*l>Ce+"1 18a"1o!
"ost im.act of a
.roject is not 3imite, to 'u,getG I:;: 'usiness Process Reengineering t-e cost of t-e PM612 to PM619 -ar,2are, soft2are or e8terna3 ven,or@contractor fees. T-e costs of interna3 staff .roject team mem0ers 2i33 nee, to 0e accounte, for, as 2e33 as an4 interna3 .roject management .artici.ation as 2e33. #taff training costs are not on34 t-e ven,or costs for ,e3iver4 of t-e training, 0ut t-e costs of -aving staff a2a4 from t-eir norma3 ,uties as 2e33. Transition to o.erations is a .3anning item t-at must 0e accounte, for 2it-in t-e .roject. Among t-e areas to 0e t-oug-t a0out is t-e staffing re5uire, to su..ort t-e so3ution, t-e 3ocation of t-e a..3ication@server, -o2 it 2i33 0e su..orte,. &i33 t-ere 0e a nee, for trainingF Bor a,,itiona3 staffingF &-at is t-e interaction@intero.era0i 3it4 2it- ot-er agenc4 a..3ications 0e manage, H 2-at a0out 0usiness continuit4 an, recover4F Re5uest* Maintenance #trateg4, Intero.era0i3it4G "-arter 2.9 Im.act on Organi<ationG 2.5 Transitions to O.erations. I:;: O.erations Oversig-t sectionG Training, es.ecia334 )no23e,ge transfer for maintenance an, o.erations of t-e ne2 s4stem.
of a .roject is to im.rove an, stream 3ine e8isting .rocesses, t-e .roject must .3an for t-e transitions to t-ose 0etter .rocesses. Eo2 2i33 en, users 0e traine, to un,erstan, an, .3an for t-ese transitionsF !ven 2-en t-e .roject/s sc-e,u3e is 0ase, on t-e necessit4 to meet a target ,ate 0ecause of e8terna3 ,ate re5uirements, a .roject must .3an for contingencies. Pre6 e8isting sc-e,u3es mig-t a3so im.act t-e ,e.3o4ment of t-e so3ution. T-e 0enefits of a .roject must not on34 0e use, in t-e se33ing of t-e .roject for fun,ing, for certification, an, for en, users, 0ut must 0e ma,e as e8.3icit as .ossi03e to uneartassum.tions, an, or furt-er re5uirements t-at 2i33 s.e33 out success. T-is e8.3icit .rocess mig-t a3so uneart- items t-at are out of sco.e for t-e .roject. Interna3 agenc4 staff time is usua334 not
t-roug- a0out as re5uire, fun,ing 0e4on, t-at origina334 a33ocate, to t-e .roject, 0ut agenc4 management 2i33 nee, to .3an aroun, t-is a,,itiona3 use of staff time. Interna3 o.erationa3 fun,s mig-t 0e use, to su..3ement a33ocations, or t-ere ma4 0e a,,itiona3 ne8t 4ear fun,ing re5uire,. Project sc-e,u3e .3anning nee,s to 0e rea3istic an, 2it-in e8terna3 .rocesses t-at im.act t-e .roject. !ac- of t-ese e8terna3 .rocesses ma4 -ave its o2n ca3en,ar of meetings, ,ea,3ines an, revie2 .roce,ures t-at must 0e met an, 2-ic- cou3, im.act t-e .roject/s time 3ine. "-arter 9.0G "ertificationG PMP* 5.2 #c-e,u3e A33ocationG A.J Procurement P3anG I:;: Procurement CPO61 to PO65DG I:;: #tate Oversig-t PM6(I to PM690
Eas t-e .roject inc3u,e, t-e #tate .rocurement Processes an, time frames as 2e33 as t-e Project certification@re3e ase of fun,s .rocess in its sc-e,u3e .3anningF
10
INITIAL PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK Project Management 04 .rovi,ing structure to t-e tem.orar4 organi<ation an, t-e so3ution ,eve3o.ment@,e.3o4ment .rocess re,uces t-e ris) of counter.ro,uctive c-aos. T-e fo33o2ing 5uestions re3ate to -o2 t-e .roject itse3f is organi<e, to ,e3iver t-e so3ution. R1#: Eas sufficient fun,ing 0een a..rove, for t-e .roject E23la!a"1o! &-i3e t-e .roject mig-t -ave sufficient fun,s for t-e ac5uisition of re5uire, Ear,2are, soft2are or "OT# so3ution, ,oes it -ave sufficient fun,ing for an4 a,,itiona3 s.ecia3i<e, tas)sF Are a33 re5uire, staffing areas covere, 04 eit-er .roject or o.erationa3 fun,ingF Eave a33 re5uire, staffing .ositions 0een i,entifie,F Initia334 a .roject mig-t not -ave a 5ua3ifie, .roject manager 0ecause t-e .roject nee,s to -ave its .3anning fun,s re3ease, t-roug- certification .rocess. A va3i, res.onse 2ou3, 0e t-at a .roject manager -as 0een 3ine, u. .en,ing t-at certification? &-et-er interna3 or contractua3, it is vita3 to t-e .roject success t-at t-e .roject manager -as t-e time to manage t-e .roject. T-e Project s.onsor an, 0usiness o2ner team 2i33 nee, to ,etermine 2-at +sufficient time7 means for t-e .roject. Rela"e, Do8-*e!"a"1o! "-arter #ection 5.0G PMP 1.2G 5.(G A.9G Re5uest* 'u,getG I:;: Project !stimating an, #c-e,u3ing PM625 to PM627 Oversig-tG "-arter A.(
Does t-e 5ua3ifie, .roject manager -ave sufficient time to manage t-e .rojectF
PMP* 5.0
To avoi, sur.rises, sta)e -o3,ers nee, to 0e "-arter A.1G PMP 2.1G invo3ve, some2a4 from t-e outset of t-e I:;: Project .roject. #.onsors-i. PM61 to T-e PM'O$1 of t-e Project Management PM62 Institute ,efines .roject sta)e-o3,ers* Project sta)e-o3,ers are in,ivi,ua3s an, organi<ations t-at are active34 invo3ve, in t-e .roject, or 2-ose interests ma4 0e affecte, as a resu3t of .roject e8ecution or .roject com.3etion. T-e4 a3so e8ert
11
inf3uence over t-e .roject/s o0jectives an, outcomes. T-is a33 encom.assing ,efinition 2ou3, -ave us t-in) a0out suc- sta)e-o3,ers as* "a0inet #ecretaries Agenc4 Division ,irectors "IO6IT =ea,s Project Manager IT o.erations staff 'usiness .rocess o2ners #4stem user re.resentatives $e4 .roject team mem0ers Training staff
In #-ort an4one 2-o ma)e 0e at a33 im.acte,. Is t-e sco.e of t-e .roject 2it-in t-e agenc4 mission Are t-ere 0usiness o2ners assigne, to t-e .roject 2-o -ave t-e time an, un,erstan, res.onsi0i3ities for t-e .rojectF Eas a .roject steering committee 0een esta03is-e, 2it-in a .roject governance .3anF T-is goes to t-e -eart of 2-4 t-e agenc4 is "-arter 2.1 ,oing t-e .roject, s.en,ing #tate resources. #-ou3, t-is .roject 0e mu3ti6agenc4 or ,one 04 t-e DoIT organi<ationF If a 0usiness o2ner ,oes not -ave t-e time to meet 2it- t-e .roject manger an, sta4 a0reast of t-e .roject, ,e3a4s cou3, ,eve3o. an, a3so t-e 0usiness o2ner cou3, 0e in an em0arrassing .osition of not )no2ing 2-at is going on. A )e4 e3ement of t-e .roject, t-e steering committee sets t-e sco.e of t-e .roject an, t-e aut-orit4 of t-e .roject manager. T-e .roject 2i33 suffer if t-ere is not an imme,iate ans2er to +2-o gave 4ou t-e aut-orit47 to ,o? "-arterG PMP c-oice of 0usiness o2ners an, "-arter 2.2 Kovernance #tructureG PMP A.2 Kovernance P3an "-arter* 2.2.2G PMP* A.2
Is t-ere a,e5uate agenc4 P3anning for a .roject t-at invo3ves agenc4 staffing resources ma,e staffing resources means coor,inating sucavai3a03e for t-e .rojectF resources 2it- agenc4 management. T-ere
12
a3so ma4 0e a nee, for a s.ecia3 s)i33 set #c-e,u3ing PM625 to not norma334 avai3a03e 2it-in t-e agenc4 PM627 an, nee,ing to 0e secure, from outsi,e, i.e. from anot-er agenc4 or a ven,or, or 04 -iring. Is t-ere a +c-ange management7 .rocess esta03is-e,F A forma3 c-ange management .rocess fi33s t-e ga. 2-en sco.e, time, 0u,get areas nee, to 0e a,juste,. It .rovi,es t-e trai3 so t-ere can 0e an ans2er to7 &-en ,i, t-is ,ecision get ma,eF +&-at -a..ene, to suc- an, suc- a featureF PMP A.(.1 G I:;: "-ange Management PM61A
RE(UIREMENT RISKS
Re5uirements justif4 an, ,rive t-e .roject. Re5uirements a3so .rovi,e measura03e means of ,efining an, eva3uating .roject success. &-i3e some2-at covere, in .roject sco.e an, .ro,uct ,e3ivera03es as 2e33 as c-ange management, re5uirements s-ou3, 0e ,eve3o.e, as a series of .ro,uct ,eve3o.ment ste.s H 'usiness6 #4stem H Design H O.erations an, De.3o4ment6 eac-aving its s.ecific ,ocumentation. T-e 3ast 5uestion in t-is section is es.ecia334 critica3 to .roject an, .ro,uct acce.tance success. T-ere is a 2-o3e section 2it-in I:;: ,e,icate, to re5uirements* 2.A Re5uirements Management. !ac- Item RM61 t-roug- RM61J a,,resses .roject an, .ro,uct ris)s. R1#: Eas t-e .roject team ,ocumente, t-e initia3 0usiness re5uirements for t-e .roject 0e4on, t-e 0usiness o0jectives 3iste, in t-e .roject c-arterF E23la!a"1o! 'usiness re5uirements sim.34 state, are a -ig- 3eve3 ,escri.tion of 2-at t-e s4stem must ,o. 'usiness Re5uirements are 3iste, as major features t-at are nee,e, to satisf4 t-e state, goa3s, o0jectives, an, strategies for t-e .roject. T-e 'usiness Re5uirements .rovi,e t-e gui,ing ,irection for t-e .roject, an, 0ecome t-e foun,ation for t-e Lser Re5uirements Rela"e, Do8-*e!"a"1o! "-arter 2.2 an, 2.( 'usiness an, Tec-nica3 O0jectives.
1(
'u46in from a33 sta)e-o3,ers is vita3 to t-e success of t-e .roject. A )e4 .roject tas) is to ana34<e re5uirements to 0a3ance sta)e-o3,er nee,s an, constraints. &it-out measura03e o0jectives an, re5uirements success is su0jective 2it-uge .otentia3 for conf3icting vie2s of sta)e-o3,ers, .roject teams an, ven,ors.
#tarting 2it- "-arter 2.262.(, PMP (.1 an, Pro,uct re5uirements ,ocumentation
'4 .rioriti<ing re5uirements Pro,uct re5uirements from t-e start, t-ere is a 0asis ,ocumentation for ,ecision ma)ing 2-en con,itiona3 or o.tiona3 re5uirements .rove cost34 eit-er in time, ,o33ars or so3ution com.3e8it4. Anot-er 2a4 of as)ing t-is is 2-et-er t-e 0usiness re5uirements are in63ine 2itagenc4 financia3 resources, e8isting staffing etc. Pro,uct DocumentationG "-arter 5.0 'u,get estimateG I:;: Project !stimating an, #c-e,u3ing PM625 to PM627
Eas an initia3 im.act ana34sis 0een .erforme, on t-e 0usiness re5uirements H i.e., cost, o.erations, su..ort Is t-ere a 2e33 ,efine, an, institutiona3i<e, c-ange contro3 .rocess for re5uirementsF
A forma3 c-ange PMP A.(.1 management .rocess fi33s t-e ga. 2-en sco.e, time, 0u,get areas nee, to 0e a,juste,. It .rovi,es t-e trai3 so t-ere can 0e an ans2er to7 &-en ,i, t-is ,ecision get ma,eF +&-at -a..ene, to suc- an, suc- a featureF T-is -o3istic a..roac- to re5uirements is meant to 0e .rotective of t-e state/s investment in t-e .roject. I:;: RM 9
Eas t-e .roject esta03is-e, t-e a0i3it4 to verif4 t-at 0usiness re5uirements can 0e trace, t-roug- tec-nica3 ,esign, s4stem 0ui3,ing or soft2are co,ing@ configuration an, test .-ases to
19
verif4 t-at t-e s4stem .erforms as inten,e, an, contains no unnecessar4 e3ementsF
TECHNICAL RISKS
T-is set of 5uestions re3ate to t-e un,er34ing tec-no3og4 for t-e .roject an, covers as.ects t-at s-ou3, 0e s.e33e, out in t-e PMP Tec-nica3 #trateg4 #ection. T-e 'usiness "ontinuit4 5uestion is a3so covere, e3se2-ere. T-e I:;: !8-i0it A contains a ,etai3e, tec-nica3 ris) section 2.7 O.erating !nvironmentG Ot-er sections are 2ort- revie2ing 2it- soft2are ,eve3o.ment or even customi<ation .rojects* 2.I Deve3o.ment !nvironmentG 2.J #oft2are Deve3o.mentG 2.10 #4stem Acce.tance TestingG 2.11 Data Management. R1#: Is t-e .roject .3anning to use an e8isting tec-no3og4F Is t-e .roject .3anning to im.3ement a "OT# C"ommercia3 Off t-e #-e3f7D so3utionF E23la!a"1o! T-ere is 3ess ris) to 2or) 2it- )no2n tec-no3og4 T-e 0ui3, or 0u4 5uestion is a significant one for .rojects. &it- s.ecia3i<e, agenc4 0usiness re5uirements a 2e33 esta03is-e, "OT# .ac)age use, 04 ot-er state or government agencies cou3, 3essen t-e ris) of t-e .roject. "ustomi<ation of a ven,or/s "OT# .ac)age great34 a,,s to t-e com.3e8it4 an, ris) of a .roject. !m0ar)ing on a .roject 2-en an agenc4/s staff is not e8.erience, in t-e tec-no3og4 .rovi,es ris). "ritica3 s4stems s-ou3, -ave t-ree environments, a ,eve3o.ment environment, a test environment an, a Rela"e, Do8-*e!"a"1o! PMP* 9.2.1 Tec-nica3 #trateg4 PMP* 9.2.1 Tec-nica3 #trateg4
If "OT# so3ution is antici.ate, 2i33 it re5uire significant customi<ation, ot-er t-an 0ui3t in set6u.@start u. configurations Does t-e agenc4 or #tate CDoITD -ave e8.erience 2it- t-e un,er34ing tec-no3og4 or -ar,2are@o.erating s4stem environmentF Is a test environment .art of t-e .roject or is t-ere an e8isting test environment t-at mirrors t-e .ro,uction environmentF
15
.ro,uction environment. Lnteste, c-anges s-ou3, never 0e a..3ie, to a .ro,uction environment. Is t-ere at 3east a tentative .3an for 'usiness "ontinuit4F Once esta03is-e, a so3ution s-ou3, -ave a 0ac)6u. an, 0usiness continuit4 .3an, an, t-is .3anning s-ou3, start from ,a4 one of t-e .roject. Re5uest* #ecurit4 #trateg4C#ummari<e P3an for #ecurit4, 'ac)u. an, Disaster Recover4DG "-arter* 2.5 Transition to O.erations
PLANNIN' RISKS
Res.onsi03e .roject .3anning inc3u,es 0ui3,ing ris) management in t-e .rocess an, a3so inc3u,es an estimation .rocess, contingenc4 .3anning, .ro,uct .3anning met-o,o3og4, an, a,e5uate i,entification of assum.tions, constraints, ,e.en,encies an, ot-er suc- ris) factors. R1#: Does t-e .3an inc3u,e t-e a..ro.riate time an, cost contingenc4F Does t-e .3an inc3u,e t-e a..ro.riate time an, cost estimatesF E23la!a"1o! T-e 3ac) of sc-e,u3e f3e8i0i3it4 or contingenc4 fun,s can a,, ris) to t-e .roject. A 2e33 ,efine, 2or) 0rea),o2n sc-e,u3e faci3itates estimation of time an, costs of a .roject. T-e .roject t-at 2or)s 0ac)2ar, from a 0u,get or a..ro.riation is at some ris). Rela"e, Do8-*e!"a"1o! "-arter* 9.0G 5.0G PMP 5.1, 5.2, 5.(G I:;: Project !stimating an, #c-e,u3ing PM625 to PM627 "-arter* 9.0G 5.0G PMP 5.1, 5.2, 5.(G I:;: Project !stimating an, #c-e,u3ing PM625 to PM627
Eas a .ro,uct .3anning met-o,o3og4 0een c-osen a..ro.riate for t-e com.3e8it4 of t-e so3ution an, t-e )no23e,ge of t-e .roject teamF
Re5uire,* +During t-e PMP* 9.2 .roject management 3ifec4c3e, agencies s-a33 se3ect an, im.3ement a .-ase .ro,uct ,eve3o.ment 3ifec4c3e met-o,o3og4 a..rove, 04 t-e De.artment.7 PRO !"T O:!R#IKET PRO"!## Memoran,um
1A
Eas t-e .roject a,e5uate34 i,entifie, t-e constraints an, assum.tions of t-e .rojectF
"onstraints an, Assum.tions "-arter 7.0GJ.0 PMP 1.(G 1.5 are ris) factors. T-e more t-ese are ma,e e8.3icit t-e more t-e .roject is a03e to ,ea3 2it- an, aroun, t-em. T-is is an on6going .rocess, 0ut es.ecia334 critica3 at t-e outset of t-e .roject. T-is ,ocument is .art of t-at .rocess. Re5uest* #ignificant Ris)s an, Migration #trateg4G "-arter 10.0G PMP 1.A an, #ection A.1
Eas t-e .roject a,e5uate34 i,entifie, t-e .roject ris)s, 2it.ro0a0i3it4, im.act, mitigation an, or contingenciesF Are t-ere significant ,e.en,encies on ot-er .rojects or staff resourcesF
De.en,encies can im.act "-arter I.0G PMP 1.9 sc-e,u3e an, cost of .rojects, an, nee, to 0e s.e33e, out from t-e outset. T-ese are es.ecia334 im.ortant to raise 2it- #.onsors, 'usiness O2ners an, #teering "ommittees
17
M1"1;a"1o! S"+a"e;6 6 I,entif4 2-at actions can 0e ta)en in or,er to re,uce t-e .ro0a0i3it4 of t-e ris), or to re,uce its im.act on t-e .roject. Co!"1!;e!86 Pla! I,entif4 2-at actions 2i33 0e ta)en 2-en t-e ris) materia3i<es an, t-reatens t-e sco.e, 0u,get, or t-e sc-e,u3e of t-e .roject. @RISK 1 NAMEA Descri.tion 6
Pro0a0i3it4 Im.act
1I
1J
T-e DoIT Ris) an, Issues =og Tem.3ate uses t-ese ca3cu3ations for Pro0a0i3it4 an, Im.act 2-ic- are usua334 -i,,en fie3,s. Number Risk 1 Risk 2 3 $ 5 6 7 ) 9 10 11 12 13 1$ 15 16 Legend+ !ini#"# risk , -ccepta' e .&#e risks , !&nit&r at %!/0ea# Le1e Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Risk Probability Certain Expected Like y %&ssi' e Certain Expected Like y *n ike y Certain Certain Expected Expected %&ssi' e Like y %&ssi' e Like y Impact Very High High !edi"# L&( High !edi"# L&( Very L&( L&( Very L&( !edi"# L&( Very High High !edi"# !edi"# Rating 0.9025 0.5625 0.3025 0.1225 0.7125 0.$125 0.1925 0.0225 0.3325 0.1$25 0.$125 0.2625 0.3325 0.$125 0.1925 0.3025 Probability 0.95 0.75 0.55 0.35 0.95 0.75 0.55 0.15 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.75 0.35 0.55 0.35 0.55 Impact 0.95 0.75 0.55 0.35 0.75 0.55 0.35 0.15 0.35 0.15 0.55 0.35 0.95 0.75 0.55 0.55
20
INITIAL PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK High risks , -cti1e #&nit&ring (ith &ng&ing C&ntingency/!itigati&n acti1ity .h&( st&ppers , -cti1e participati&n (ith steering c&##ittee t& #itigate
Cal8-la"e, R1#: Ra"1!;: Ris) rating to 0e use, for action6fo33o2ing as s-o2n 0e3o2* Legend+ !ini#"# risk , -ccepta' e .&#e risks , !&nit&r at %!/0ea# Le1e High risks , -cti1e #&nit&ring (ith &ng&ing C&ntingency/!itigati&n acti1ity .h&( st&ppers , -cti1e participati&n (ith steering c&##ittee t& #itigate
21
INITIAL PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT WORKBOOK T-e initia3 ris) assessment is focuse, on five )e4 areas, Im.act, Project Organi<ation, Re5uirements, Tec-nica3 Ris)s an, P3anning Ris)s. T-ese areas an, t-eir 5uestions e8.3ore t-e )in,s of .itfa33s t-at ot-er .rojects -ave face,, some successfu334 ot-ers not.
T-is Ris) an, Issue =og Tem.3ate 0ui3,s on t-e DoIT .ro0a0i3it4 an, Im.act categories an, ca3cu3ates t-e Ris) Rating for 2-ic- t-e 3egen, in item M1 s-ou3, 0e use, to ,etermine t4.e of action to 0e ta)en. THE DOIT RISK REPORTIN' LON' &ORM TEMPLATE T-is tem.3ate is inten,e, for .rojects t-at 2ou3, 3i)e to co33ect an, manage more ris) an, ris) mitigation information t-an is su..orte, in t-e DoIT Ris) an, Issue =og Tem.3ate.
IM$B
Pre.are an, ,e3iver an Initia3 Ris) Assessment re.ort on t-e re5uire, activities. Re.ort on status of eac- activit4 an, on t-e effectiveness of Project management an, 2-et-er t-e Project activities are meeting t-e
22
o0jectives set fort- 04 t-e Project. Csee Deliverables for more ,etai3sD
R1#: Ma!a;e*e!"
PM$1F
:erif4 t-at a Project Ris) Management P3an is create, an, 0eing fo33o2e,. !va3uate t-e Projects ris) management .3ans an, .roce,ures to verif4 t-at ris)s are i,entifie, an, 5uantifie, an, t-at mitigation .3ans are ,eve3o.e,, communicate,, im.3emente,, monitore,, an, com.3ete.
RISK REPORT HTO BE USED WITH DOIT RISK AND ISSUES LO' TEMPLATEI
PROJECT:
SECTION I: INITIAL NOTI&ICATION
REPORTED BY: DESCRIPTION: REPORTED DATE:
2(
MITI'ATION STRATE'Y:
29
MITI'ATION STRATE'Y:
CONTIN'ENCY PLAN:
DATE TAKEN:
RESULTIN' DECISION:
25
CLOSED:
2A