Curtin University of Technology T12/3 School of Architecture Construction and Planning 1.0. STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT - STEPS
The following is a nine-step stakeholder management process (Cleland, 1986; Dinsmore, 1995; Wideman, 1988):
1. identify stakeholders 2. gather information on them 3. determine the external stakeholder mission 4. assess stakeholders strengths and weaknesses 5. identify the stakeholder strategy 6. predict expected stakeholder behaviour 7. plan how each stakeholder should be dealt with. 8. implement stakeholder management plans. 9. maintain stakeholder management plans.
Each of these steps is explained below.
Step 1: Stakeholder Identification
It is a good idea to identify the project stakeholders during early project planning/conceptual phases (Wideman, 1998; Tuman, 1993). Stakeholders must be identified as individuals with names and faces, not just departments or groups (Dinsmore, 1995). The result of the stakeholder identification process is a list of a number of stakeholders, all of which need to be managed (Cleland, 1986).
Step 2: Gather Information on the Stakeholders
Cleland & King (1988) suggests that the following questions need to be considered when gathering stakeholder information: What needs to be known about the stakeholder ? Where and how can the information be gathered ? Who will have the responsibility for the gathering, analysis, and interpretation of the information ? How and to whom will the information be distributed ? Who has responsibility for the use of the information in the decision context of the project ? How can the information be protected from leakage or misuse ?
Curtin University of Technology T12/4 School of Architecture Construction and Planning Tuman (1993) suggests that information can be obtained about stakeholders by talking to them and opening lines of communication, through advertising, surveys, public meetings, and information hotlines.
Step 3: Determine the Stakeholder Mission
Once the stakeholders have been identified and information gathered about them, analysis is carried out to determine the nature of their mission or stake. Not only will different groups be concerned with different issues, they may have different stakes in different issues. For example, Greenpeace may have a high stake and expectations in the projects environmental performance, but a lower stake in the projects industrial relations policy (Polonsky, 1995).
Step 4: Assess Stakeholders Strengths and Weaknesses
An assessment of stakeholder strengths and weaknesses is a prerequisite to understanding their strategies (Baker et al, 1988). The output of this process is a list of the most important strengths that the stakeholder may use against the project, and a list of weaknesses that they will probably avoid in pursuing their interests on the project.
There is a need to establish the relative importance of each stakeholder to the project, and in particular, identifying the high risk stakeholders (Wideman, 1998). Project team members should then focus their energy and resources on the stakeholders that have the greatest power to hinder project success (Tuman, 1993; Wideman, 1998). However, the cooperative potential of many stakeholders should not be overlooked, as this can be used to great advantage for the project (Polonsky, 1995).
In order to rank stakeholders according to their potential impact on project success, Tuman (1993) suggests allocating, for each stakeholder, a score between 1 and 5 (1=low, 5 =high) according to the power that the stakeholder has to influence project success, and also according to how difficult it would be to meet the stakeholders objectives. Tuman (1993) uses a weighted scoring technique to obtain the scores, while Dinsmore (1995) suggests allocating a score between 1 and 3 (1=low, 2=moderate, 3=high) for each of these factors.
Each score is then used to develop a stakeholder success grid, similar to the one shown in Figure 1.1. Those stakeholders that are found to lie in quadrant I are expected to have little impact on project success, those in quadrant II are expected to have a potential impact on project success, those in quadrant III are expected to have a normal impact on project Stakeholder Management Topic No. 12 ___________________________________________________________________________
Curtin University of Technology T12/5 School of Architecture Construction and Planning success, while stakeholders in quadrant IV are expected to have a major impact on project success (Tuman, 1993).
Figure 1.1: Stakeholder Success Grid (adapted from Tuman, 1993, p213)
Step 5: Identify the Stakeholder Strategy
Stakeholders will formulate a strategy - either formally or informally - that sets the direction for accomplishment of their mission. Once the stakeholders strategy is understood, then the stakeholders probable behaviour can be understood (Baker et al, 1986).
Step 6: Predict Expected Stakeholder Behaviour
Based on an understanding of external stakeholder strategy obtained in step 5 above, stakeholder behaviour to implement these strategies can be predicted. When stakeholder behaviour is properly predicted, the project team can then develop strategies to deal with adversary stakeholder influence (Baker et al, 1988).
Step 7: Plan how Each Stakeholder Should be Dealt with.
Communication and an honest attempt to meet stakeholder concerns should be key pieces of the strategy (Sandaas, 1988). The strategy should include resource requirements, priorities, and a schedule consistent with the project for which the process is being developed (Wideman, 1998). Stakeholder Management Topic No. 12 ___________________________________________________________________________
Curtin University of Technology T12/6 School of Architecture Construction and Planning Step 8: Implement Stakeholder Management Plans
Implementation of the stakeholder management plans involves ensuring that the specific actions, responsible parties, and dates that were planned in step 7 above are formally established. Stakeholder management plans should be implemented in accordance with the relative importance of the stakeholders (determined in step 4 above). That is, major emphasis on the small number of stakeholders that have a strong impact, normal efforts toward an intermediate group, and moderate attention toward stakeholders with a lesser impact (Dinsmore, 1995).
Step 9: Maintain Stakeholder Management Plans
This step involves the continuous monitoring of the effectiveness of the program during its application and adjusting it as necessary for optimum results (Wideman, 1998; Dinsmore, 1995).
2.0.REFERENCES
BAKER, B.N., MURPHY, D.C. & FISHER, D., 1988. Factors Affecting Project Success. In Cleland, D. & King, W., eds., 1988.. Project Management Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 902-919.
DINSMORE, P., 1995. "Will the Real Stakeholders Please Stand Up ?" PM Network, December, pp9-10.
POLONSKY, M.J., 1995. "A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Designing Environmental Marketing Strategy." Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 10(3), pp29-46.
SANDAAS, R., 1988. "External Factors: A Real Threat to Effective Project Management." In: Project Management Institute Seminar/Symposium, San Francisco, California, Sept 17-21.
TUMAN, J., 1993. Models for Achieving Project Success Through Team Building and Stakeholder Management. In: Dinsmore, P. AMA Handbook of Project Management New York, AMACOM, 1993, pp 207-223.
WIDEMAN, M.R., 1998. How to Motivate All Stakeholders to Work Together. In: D.I. Cleland, ed. Field Guide to Project Management. USA: International Thomson Publishing Company. Stakeholder Management Topic No. 12 ___________________________________________________________________________
Curtin University of Technology T12/7 School of Architecture Construction and Planning SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
Question 1: List 3 stakeholders on your project.:
1. determine their mission 2. assess their strengths and weaknesses 3. identify the stakeholder strategy 4. predict expected stakeholder behaviour 5. plan how each stakeholder should be dealt with.