Reviews For Paper Paper ID 124 Title Low Cost Portable Oscilloscope Based on Arduino and GLCD

Masked Reviewer ID: Assigned_Reviewer_6 Review: Question Detailed Comments Any comment on plagiarism of this paper? If any please comment. The paper implements an Oscilloscope using an Aurdino and GLCD unit. The implementation is very interesting and has some practical values. Ans: Thankyou sir No

Masked Reviewer ID: Assigned_Reviewer_7 Review: Question The paper presents a low cost portable oscilloscope. The topics are significant for a reasonable device in circuit developments. However, originality of the paper and necessary techniques through the development are not clear for the readers. The author should add some descriptions of concerns. Fig.2 is too small for printing. Ans: The figure has a width much more greater than the height. Besides, the schematic is captured from proteus during my design phase. It is not at all possible to edit the figure. The followings might be typos or language errors. p.1,c.1,l.6: "GLCD" should be defined here. Ans: Defined p.1,c.1,l.8: "would have using". Ans: Changed p.1,c.1,l.18: "user friendly to use". Ans: Changed to east to operate p.1,c.1,l.31: "farther", "further" is better. Ans: Changed to further

Detailed Comments

p.1,c.1: "This firmware basic triggering technique". Ans: Changed p.2,c.1: Paragraphs should be clearly shown. Ans: Changed p.2,c.1: "100V ac or dc" Ans: Changed to 100VAC or 100VDC Fig.3: "Screen dump", shots is better. Ans: Changed to Screen shot p.2,c.1: "is been made". Ans: Changed to is written entirely in p.2,c.1: "AVR" is not defined. Ans: Changed to microcontroller p.2,c.2: "AVR Prints" Ans: Changed to microcontroller prints p.2,c.2: "in introduced" Ans: Changed to is introduced Fig.4: "Minimum voltage" Changed to minimum voltage p.3,c.1: "As there is auto display calibration function is included" Ans: converted to simple sentences p.3,c.1: "the hardware easy" Ans: Changed Fig.6(title): "Arduino Based low" Ans: Changed to Block diagram of the oscilloscope p.3,c.2: "signal of different from" Ans: Correccted p.3,c.2: "I found", p.4,c.1: "I believe": In general, "We" is used in the technical paper even for the sole author. Ans: Changed to we Any comment on plagiarism of this paper? If any please comment. No

Masked Reviewer ID: Assigned_Reviewer_8

Review: Question too short paper - 3.5 pg only - extend it with detailed project - no; paper - y Fig.4 - border-thin Ans: Thinned Sec. V: no detail on constraints, limit, lack of discussions, need more features to explain. Ans: Edited as suggested remove - former student from author at the top Ans: Removed last sentence in Abstract - remove. Ans: Removed No

Detailed Comments

Any comment on plagiarism of this paper? If any please comment.